Skip to main content
Allergy and Asthma Proceedings logoLink to Allergy and Asthma Proceedings
editorial
. 2026 Jul;47(4):233–236. doi: 10.2500/aap.2026.47.260047

Food allergy, biologic therapies, and diagnostic precision: Expanding frontiers in allergy and immunology

Joseph A Bellanti, Russell A Settipane
PMCID: PMC13312945  PMID: 42343496

This issue of Allergy & Asthma Proceedings highlights the evolving breadth and complexity of allergic and immunologic disease, spanning food allergy and anaphylaxis, chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), hereditary angioedema (HAE), asthma prevention, biologic therapy during pregnancy, drug hypersensitivity, and medical education. Collectively, the articles underscore the increasingly nuanced interplay among immune dysregulation, environmental exposures, patient-centered outcomes, and health-care disparities. They also reinforce the growing importance of diagnostic precision and individualized management strategies in contemporary allergy/immunology practice.

Previous publications in the pages of the Proceedings have identified food allergy and anaphylaxis as recurrent themes,1–16 underscoring the continuing clinical importance of these topics to the practicing allergist/immunologist, and this issue is no exception. Among the most intriguing and rapidly evolving food allergy syndromes is galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-gal) syndrome, a disorder that continues to reshape our understanding of food allergy pathogenesis. In this issue, Platts-Mills et al.17 review the role of tick bites in the development of immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies directed against α-gal, emphasizing the distinctive delayed allergic reactions associated with mammalian meat ingestion. The authors discuss how tick-induced pruritus and basophil infiltration may promote IgE class switching, while also examining the broader epidemiologic implications of expanding deer and lone star tick populations. Their review further revisits the historical association between cetuximab hypersensitivity and α-gal sensitization as well as the biologic importance of α-gal as a major xenotransplantation barrier between primates and pigs.

Additional insights into food allergy diagnostics are provided by Hismiogullari et al.,18 who evaluated key factors in diagnosing sesame allergy in children. In this retrospective diagnostic accuracy study of 49 children undergoing oral food challenge, tahini-based skin-prick testing (SPT) demonstrated superior predictive performance compared with sesame-specific IgE testing. A tahini SPT cutoff of 7.5 mm provided both high sensitivity and specificity, whereas sesame-specific IgE showed lower diagnostic accuracy. Interestingly, younger children and children with atopic dermatitis were more likely to demonstrate clinical nonreactivity during oral food challenge. The authors conclude that tahini-based SPT may represent a more clinically useful diagnostic tool in pediatric sesame allergy assessment.

In addressing a less common seed allergen, Acikalin et al.19 present one of the largest pediatric series to date that examined IgE-mediated pumpkin seed allergy. Among the 25 children evaluated, immediate reactions were universal, with anaphylaxis occurring in nearly two-thirds of patients. Atopic comorbidities and co-allergies, particularly to tree nuts and other seeds, were highly prevalent. Notably, pumpkin pulp was tolerated in all the patients, which suggests important distinctions between seed and pulp allergenicity. Their accompanying structured literature review identified only 14 previously reported cases worldwide, which underscores both the rarity and potential severity of pumpkin seed allergy and the need for greater clinician awareness in regions with high seed consumption.

Despite advances in food allergy diagnosis, disparities in food allergy outcomes remain a major public health concern. Esteban et al.20 examine the influence of social contextual factors on food allergy-related emergency department (ED) utilization in children. Their study of 1512 pediatric patients demonstrated higher rates of ED use among Black and Latino children compared with non-Latino White children. However, much of this disparity seemed attributable to social and neighborhood-level determinants, including public insurance status, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation, and community resource availability. Importantly, disparities were negligible among the children already connected to routine allergy care, which suggests that access to specialty allergy services may represent an important protective factor against food allergy–related emergency utilization.

Liu et al.21 also examine important gaps in anaphylaxis management by evaluating national patterns of epinephrine prescribing at discharge among adults treated for anaphylaxis in U.S. EDs. Despite guideline recommendations, only 14% of the patients discharged after anaphylaxis received an epinephrine prescription. Older adults and Hispanic patients were significantly less likely to receive prescriptions, whereas most patients experienced relatively short ED observation periods. The authors conclude that substantial opportunities remain to improve adherence to anaphylaxis discharge guidelines and reduce disparities in emergency allergy care.

For patients with CSU, predicting long-term disease control and understanding the factors that influence remission remain major clinical challenges, particularly in those who require biologic therapy. This issue features two important contributions that address CSU and biologic management. In the first, Savas et al.22 investigated predictors of delayed treatment-free remission in patients with antihistamine-refractory CSU who were receiving omalizumab. Among 163 adults, a longer symptom duration before biologic initiation and the presence of coexisting autoimmune disease independently predicted delayed remission. These findings support the concept that earlier initiation of biologic therapy as well as underlying autoimmune comorbidity may substantially influence long-term disease trajectories in CSU.

In extending these observations beyond disease remission to patient-centered outcomes, Dash et al.23 prospectively evaluated the relationship between disease activity and quality of life in CSU by using the Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days and the Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire. Although both measures improved substantially over 6 months of therapy, the correlation between symptom activity and quality of life weakened as disease control improved. Analysis of their findings suggest that residual psychosocial burden may persist despite apparent clinical remission, which emphasizes the importance of incorporating both symptom-based assessments and patient-reported quality-of-life measures into comprehensive CSU management.

HAE remains another recurring focus of the Proceedings.24–39 In this issue, Schmalzried et al.40 present a systematic review that evaluated the use of icatibant for acute HAE attacks in pediatric patients. In reviewing three open-label phase III pediatric studies that involved 43 children and adolescents, the authors report rapid symptom relief, favorable tolerability, and the feasibility of self- or caregiver-administration in older pediatric patients.40 Although comparative pediatric trials remain limited, analysis of these findings supports icatibant as a practical and targeted therapeutic option for the treatment of acute HAE attacks in children.

The expanding use of biologic therapies across allergic diseases has generated increasing interest in their safety during pregnancy. In this issue, Ventura and Clayton41 report a multicenter retrospective study that evaluated pregnancy outcomes among patients exposed to dupilumab during pregnancy. Compared with matched controls, patients exposed to dupilumab demonstrated no significant increase in overall pregnancy complications or in maternal-, fetal-, or labor-related adverse outcomes. These findings provide important preliminary reassurance with regard to dupilumab use during pregnancy in patients with asthma, eczema, and eosinophilic esophagitis, while also underscoring the need for larger prospective studies that evaluate long-term maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Drug hypersensitivity and the challenge of distinguishing true allergic reactions from nonimmunologic adverse events remain central concerns in allergy practice. Galata et al.42 examined 101 patients referred for suspected local anesthetic hypersensitivity. Despite a broad spectrum of reported reactions, including 18 patients with severe symptoms, they found that immunologically mediated allergy was exceedingly rare. Only one patient demonstrated a positive skin test result, and this patient subsequently tolerated an alternative anesthetic during provocation testing. Their findings reinforce the importance of guideline-based evaluation and a careful clinical history in avoiding unnecessary drug avoidance and procedural delays.

With shifting attention to asthma prevention and modifiable environmental risk factors, Liu et al.43 evaluated dietary patterns and asthma risk among 7216 children by using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Children who consumed a dietary pattern characterized by refined foods, red meat, and high sugar intake demonstrated an increased risk of asthma, whereas a more balanced, fruit- and vegetable-enriched dietary pattern seemed protective, particularly among children 3 to 5 years of age. The authors suggest that early childhood may represent a critical window for dietary interventions to reduce the risk of asthma development.

This issue also addresses an increasingly important aspect of academic medicine and fellowship recruitment in the digital era. Hamid et al.44 conducted a national analysis of U.S. allergy and immunology fellowship program web sites, which demonstrated substantial variability in their comprehensiveness. Although most programs provided curriculum and leadership information, fewer included wellness initiatives, alumni outcomes, or trainee demographic data. The authors conclude that improving web site content may enhance recruitment, applicant engagement, and program visibility within an increasingly competitive virtual recruitment environment.

Rounding out this issue is the latest installment in the “Patient-Oriented Problem Solving” series,12,16,45–50 which continues to provide a practical educational framework for allergy/immunology fellows-in-training. In this issue, Luu et al.51 present the case of a 34-year-old woman with cyclical abdominal pain and rash. Through careful clinical reasoning and multidisciplinary evaluation, the authors identify the underlying disorder responsible for the patient’s recurrent symptoms. This case underscores the importance of recognizing cyclical symptom patterns and maintaining a broad differential diagnosis when evaluating complex multisystem allergic presentations.

In summary, the articles featured in this issue collectively highlight the rapidly evolving landscape of allergy and immunology, encompassing food allergy and anaphylaxis, CSU, HAE, asthma prevention, biologic therapies, drug hypersensitivity, health-care disparities, and physician education. Several recurring themes emerge throughout the issue, including the importance of diagnostic precision, the expanding role of biologic therapies, the influence of environmental and social determinants on allergic disease outcomes, and the growing recognition of patient-centered quality-of-life measures in chronic allergic disorders. Together, these contributions reflect the mission of Allergy & Asthma Proceedings: to provide timely, clinically relevant information that advances the science and practice of allergy, asthma, and immunology while ultimately improving patient care.

On behalf of the Editors and Editorial Board, we thank our readers for their continued support and hope that the articles in this issue provide practical insight and value in daily clinical practice.

Footnotes

The authors have no conflicts to declare pertaining to this article

No funding sources reported

REFERENCES

  • 1.Magen E, Magen I, Merzon E, et al. Comorbidity burden in patients with anaphylaxis: a 25-year nationwide population-based matched case-control study. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:196–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kocatepe G, Uygun DFK, Ture S, et al. Cow's milk protein allergy: a risk factor for infections in infants? Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:e17–e23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hakverdi O, Ocak M, Sahiner UM, et al. House dust allergens of children with newly diagnosed hazelnut or sesame allergy. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:47–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Davis J, Ward ER, Huang X, et al. Food allergy referral patterns from 2013–2015 to 2016–2018 at Texas Children's Hospital. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025; 46:e172–e175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ozanli I, Uluc NN, Iskender N, et al. Food allergy concurrent with atopic dermatitis: correlation with age of onset and severity. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025; 46:e137–e143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Karatas P, Gulec Koksal Z, Uysal P. Egg allergy in children: patterns of consumption of homemade fermented milk products by mothers during pregnancy. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025; 46:e144–e150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Luccioli S, Seabol L. Anaphylaxis in children: latest insights. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025; 46:168–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Engelhardt E, Prince BT, Stukus DR, et al. To test or not to test: lessons learned from screening infants for peanut allergy. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025; 46:144–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shaker MS. The use of biologics in food allergy management. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2024; 45:409–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Aytekin Guvenir F, Sengul Emeksiz Z, Buyuk Yaytokgil S, et al. Fruit allergy and anaphylaxis in children: culprit fruits and clinical findings. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2024; 45:e31–e37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shin S, Jang S, Kim J, et al. Initial updosing phase of oral immunotherapy improves quality of life and psychological burden in parents of children with food allergy. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2024; 45:128–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Baloh CH, Hsu JT. Oral immunotherapy with sunflower seed butter and a review of seed allergy. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2024; 45:137–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kazancioglu A, Konuralp I, Sahiner UM, et al. Understanding of lipid transfer protein sensitization patterns and its clinical significance in children. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2024; 45:120–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Magen E, Merzon E, Green I, et al. A case-control study for comorbidity and laboratory factors associated with food-induced anaphylaxis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2024; 45:53–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tachdjian R, Chase N, Burnette A, et al. Incorrect perceptions of first-line treatment of severe allergic reactions with over-the-counter products and how the epinephrine drug delivery system impacts behavior. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:40–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jaroenpuntaruk V, Volcheck GW. Perioperative anaphylaxis manifesting as cardiac arrest during cardiac surgery. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025; 46:70–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Platts-Mills TAE, Altamirano CD, Gangwar RS, et al. The a-gal syndrome: understanding the role of tick bites, and the delays in severe anaphylaxis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:237–246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hismiogullari A, Sancaklı Ö, Ocak M, et al. Key factors in the diagnosis of sesame allergy in children. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:274–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Acikalin B, Ocak M, Sekerel BE, et al. Immunoglobulin E–mediated pumpkin seed allergy in children: case series and narrative review with a structured literature search. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:e50–e56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Esteban CA, Cushman GK, Chandra S, et al. Social context factors and disparities in emergency department use in pediatric food allergy. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:253–263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu EY, Zhang C, Ray T, et al. Patterns of epinephrine prescribing at discharge and length of stay for adult anaphylaxis in U.S. emergency departments. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:264–273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aslan Savas S, Colkesen F, Gerek ME, et al. Predictors of delayed treatment-free remission with omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticarial. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:282–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dash M, Ayub A, Vasudevan B, et al. Correlation of disease activity (Urticaria Activity Score over 7 Days) and quality of life (Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire) in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria: a prospective observational study. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:e57–e64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lumry WR, Bernstein JA, Li HH, et al. An expert panel’s review on patients with hereditary angioedema switching from attenuated androgens to oral prophylactic therapy. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2024; 45:44–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tachdjian R, Savic S, Fridman M, et al. Real-world reporting rates of administration-site reactions with on-demand treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2024; 45:37–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Radojicic C, Anderson J. Hereditary angioedema with normal C1 esterase inhibitor: current paradigms and clinical dilemmas. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2024; 45:147–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Anderson J, Soteres D, Mellor J, et al. Physician- and patient-reported outcomes by hereditary angioedema type: data from a real-world study. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2024; 45:247–254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cakmak ME, Bostan OC, Kaya SB, et al. Assessment of clinical phenotypic characteristics of patients with angioedema without wheals in a Turkish population. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2024; 45:240–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Odin R, Anderson J, Jacobs J, et al. The utility of shared decision making in the management of hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2024; 45:434–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lumry WR, Grumach AS, Betschel SD, et al. Management of hereditary angioedema attacks by patients on long-term prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy only. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025; 46:32–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Braverman J, Ellis D, Gavata-Steiger S, et al. Analyzing social media conversations to gain insights into the experiences of patients with hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025; 46:218–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zuraw BL, Lopez-Gonzalez L, Manjelievskaia J, et al. Adherence and persistence among patients with hereditary angioedema receiving long-term prophylaxis in the United States. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025; 46:209–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Staubach P, Craig TJ, Fukuda T, et al. Becoming attack-free further improves health-related quality of life in patients with hereditary angioedema receiving garadacimab. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025; 46:200–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Guilarte M, Lumry WR, Magerl M, et al. Garadacimab improves long-term health-related quality of life in patients with hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025; 46:192–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Young MC, Banerji A. Angioedema without urticaria: diagnosis and management. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025; 46:185–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Akten HS, Dilek E, Orman M, et al. Can depression and anxiety be predicted in hereditary angioedema? A comprehensive assessment. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025; 46:e71–e81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Levy DS, Nagase FI, Cheung A, et al. Quality of life and burden of disease in patients with hereditary angioedema and their caregivers. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025; 46:398–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Busse P, Wilson K, Farkas H, et al. Rethinking the management of hereditary angioedema. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:92–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Davis-Lorton M, Soteres D, Lumry WR, et al. Real-world quality of life in patients with hereditary angioedema receiving lanadelumab or other long-term prophylaxis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:102–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schmalzried S, Beckett RD, Davis H, et al. Icatibant for acute hereditary angioedema attacks in pediatric patients: a systematized review. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:247–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ventura FL, Clayton SB. Safety of dupilumab use during pregnancy: a composite evaluation of pregnancy outcomes. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:291–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Galata Z, Limoncu O, Tunakan Dalgıc C, et al. Local anesthetic hypersensitivity: Frequently suspected, rarely proven: A retrospective study of 101 patients. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:297–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Liu L, Bai Y, Huang Y, et al. The impact of dietary patterns on the risk of asthma in children. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:e65–e72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hamid N, Merheb D, Love M, et al. The digital front door: a national analysis of U.S. allergy and immunology fellowship program web sites. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:304–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Choi PJ, Fajt ML. An 82-year-old man with new skin lesions after COVID-19 vaccination. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2024; 45:70–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mari DC, Banks TA. Removing the penicillin allergy label in a hospitalized adolescent with a remote penicillin and recent cephalosporin allergy. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2024; 45:207–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Salazar L, Acevedo J, Adame F, et al. A case of a rash after tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis and meningococcal vaccination. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2024; 45:456–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Upadhyay P, Valdes Camacho J, Khan A, et al. Unmasking the underlying cause: a rash with deeper implications. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2025; 46:512–514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gard CN, Blase J, Speck A. An infant with chronic relapsing urticaria. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:70–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang K, Wangberg H. Recurrent full-body rash following chemotherapy initiation in a multiple myeloma patient. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:225–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Luu J, Tsai L, Kumar M, et al. 34-year-old female with cyclical abdominal pain and rash. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2026; 47:309–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Allergy and Asthma Proceedings are provided here courtesy of OceanSide Publications

RESOURCES