Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1973 Jan;228(2):435–458. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010094

The specific effect of potassium on transmitter release by motor nerve terminals and its inhibition by calcium

J D Cooke, D M J Quastel
PMCID: PMC1331305  PMID: 4346993

Abstract

1. There exist two distinct effects of potassium on the transmitter release system, one which develops rapidly and another which becomes maximal much more slowly. The fast effect is inhibited by raised Ca2+, which does not inhibit transmitter release evoked by depolarizing pulses. Thus the fast effect is not secondary to nerve terminal depolarization.

2. The fast effect of K+ was found to consist in an increase in the slope of the linear relation between log m.e.p.p. frequency and nerve terminal depolarization. This effect is complete within a few seconds, is inhibited by raised Ca2+, and is not produced by prolonged focal or electrotonic depolarization, which instead tends to reduce the slope of log m.e.p.p. frequency vs. depolarization.

3. A slope change effect like that of K+ was not found with ouabain or ethanol, nor did these agents depress the slope change effect of K+. The specific action of K+ was not exerted on release evoked in the absence of Ca2+ by ethanol, chloral hydrate, or raised osmotic pressure.

4. It is suggested that the specific action of K+ is to increase the lability of nerve terminal Ca permeability with respect to depolarization of the nerve terminal membrane, while the slow effect of K+ simply reflects nerve terminal depolarization, slow to become maximal because of diffusion barriers limiting access of raised K+ to the Ranvier nodes of motor axons.

Full text

PDF
435

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cooke J. D., Okamoto K., Quastel D. M. The role of calcium in depolarization-secretion coupling at the motor nerve terminal. J Physiol. 1973 Jan;228(2):459–497. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cooke J. D., Quastel D. M. Cumulative and persistent effects of nerve terminal depolarization on transmitter release. J Physiol. 1973 Jan;228(2):407–434. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooke J. D., Quastel D. M. Transmitter release by mammalian motor nerve terminals in response to focal polarization. J Physiol. 1973 Jan;228(2):377–405. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Changes in end-plate activity produced by presynaptic polarization. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):586–604. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DEL CASTILLO J., STARK L. The effect of calcium ions on the motor end-plate potentials. J Physiol. 1952 Apr;116(4):507–515. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Elmqvist D. Potassium induced release of transmitter at the human neuromuscular junction. Acta Physiol Scand. 1965 Aug;64(4):340–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1965.tb04188.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gage P. W., Quastel D. M. Competition between sodium and calcium ions in transmitter release at mammalian neuromuscular junctions. J Physiol. 1966 Jul;185(1):95–123. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gage P. W., Quastel D. M. Dual effect of potassium on transmitter release. Nature. 1965 May 8;206(984):625–626. doi: 10.1038/206625a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hubbard J. I., Jones S. F., Landau E. M. An examination of the effects of osmotic pressure changes upon transmitter release from mammalian motor nerve terminals. J Physiol. 1968 Aug;197(3):639–657. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hubbard J. I., Willis W. D. The effects of depolarization of motor nerve terminals upon the release of transmitter by nerve impulses. J Physiol. 1968 Feb;194(2):381–405. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Katz B., Miledi R. Tetrodotoxin-resistant electric activity in presynaptic terminals. J Physiol. 1969 Aug;203(2):459–487. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LILEY A. W., NORTH K. A. An electrical investigation of effects of repetitive stimulation on mammalian neuromuscular junction. J Neurophysiol. 1953 Sep;16(5):509–527. doi: 10.1152/jn.1953.16.5.509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Quastel D. M., Hackett J. T., Cooke J. D. Calcium: is it required for transmitter secretion? Science. 1971 Jun 4;172(3987):1034–1036. doi: 10.1126/science.172.3987.1034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. TAKEUCHI A., TAKEUCHI N. Changes in potassium concentration around motor nerve terminals, produced by current flow, and their effects on neuromuscular transmission. J Physiol. 1961 Jan;155:46–58. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES