Skip to main content
Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute logoLink to Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute
. 2025 Nov 16;37:74. doi: 10.1186/s43046-025-00330-x

New insights into the effects of microbiome and its derived metabolites on targeted immunotherapy

Maged Tharwat Elghannam 1,✉, Moataz Hassan Hassanien 1, Yosry Abdel Rahman Ameen 1, Emad Abdelwahab Turky 1, Gamal Mohammed ELattar 1, Ahmed Aly ELRay 1, Mohammed Darwish ELTalkawy 1
PMCID: PMC13313402  PMID: 41243049

Abstract

The significance of gut bacteria and their byproducts is gaining greater recognition, especially in the realm of immunotherapy. An imbalance in gut bacteria or their byproducts is intricately linked to the onset, progression, and treatment of cancer. Metabolites derived from gut microbiota, including short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), secondary bile acids (SBAs), indole derivatives, and trimethylamine oxide (TMAO), engage with cellular targets to initiate intracellular signaling pathways. These signals are conveyed to the cell, influencing its growth. Targeted therapies encompass a complex and ever-evolving area that is crucial in cancer management. Nonetheless, it is vital to recognize that targeted therapy encounters a multitude of challenges. Factors influencing the success of targeted therapy include drug resistance resulting from prolonged use, side effects, and variations in genetic mutations, tumor diversity, and the complex nature of the tumor microenvironment. Recently, we have deepened our understanding of the relationship between the gut microbiome and anticancer targeted therapies. This is one face of the molecular pathologic epidemiology. This prompts us to investigate promising treatment strategies linked to these gut bacteria and their metabolites, thereby unlocking new possibilities for targeted anticancer therapies.

Keywords: Gut microbiota, Bacterial metabolites, Targeted therapy, Drug-resistance

Introduction

The gastrointestinal microbiota is a complex community of bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses present in the host’s digestive tract. The genetic material of the microbiota in addition to the surrounding environmental conditions are referred to as the microbiome [1, 2]. Microbiota has many essential functions that keep sustaining the homeostasis of the digestive system. Microbiota preserve the intestinal barrier with a consequence of proper digestion and absorption of nutrients. In addition, microbiota regulate the function of the immune system and provide defense against pathogenic invasions . Various factors can offend the homeostatic status of the gut bacteria. These factors include drugs, diet, and genetic susceptibility [3, 4].

Gastric microbiota include 5 dominant phyla, namely, Anaplasma, Firmicutes, Clostridium, Actinobacteria, and Aspergillus (including H. pylori). However, the dominant phyla attached to the gastric mucosa include Firmicutes and Aspergillus phyla. In contrast, the gastric lumen is most commonly colonized by the Firmicutes, Clostridium, and Actinobacteria phyla [5].

Gastrointestinal microbes and their metabolites contribute significantly to the process of malignant transformation in a multifaceted manner. They aid in tumor metastasis, influence the efficacy of immunotherapy, and are responsible for chemotherapy resistance [6]. Although the microbiota may be present in areas far away from the gut, as in the oral cavity, lung, or skin, they can influence malignant biology and transformation whether initiation or progression in interaction with gut microbiota [7, 8].

Targeted therapies constitute a sophisticated and ever-evolving field that is essential in cancer therapy. These therapies are extensively applied across a range of cancer types, such as solid and hematologic tumors [9, 10]. The particular molecular targets include the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) [11], epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [12], human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) [13], and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) [14]. These targets are vital molecules that influence cancer cell survival, proliferation, and metastasis. Targeted therapies can, with a high degree of accuracy, destroy cancer cells with considerable benefits over conventional chemotherapy, such as the capacity to customize treatment plans according to the patient’s distinct genetic profile and disease condition. Such personalization increases specificity, reduces harm to adjacent healthy cells, and thereby lessens side effects while enhancing patient outcomes. However, opposing force that may reduce drug effectiveness include prolonged use that lead to drug resistance, side effects, drug pressure causing genetic mutations, the tumor heterogenic cellular structure, and the intricate nature of the surrounding tumor environment. Furthermore, individual pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in each individual patient that affect drug absorption, distribution, and metabolism add to the discrepancies in treatment results. Although the FDA approved many drugs such as rituximab, cetuximab, and bevacizumab [15], still, it is difficult to anticipate how high the competency of the targeted therapy is [16]. This review aims to illustrate how the microbiome and its derived metabolites can affect the response to immune target therapy and explain differences in disease outcomes and response to treatment.

Molecular pathological epidemiology (MPE)

Pathology and epidemiology have been integrated into the single, unified field of molecular pathological epidemiology (MPE). Most human diseases, and essentially all cancers, are biologically different from one patient to the next.

The primary aim of MPE is to uncover an interactive relationship between a specific environmental exposure and disease subtypes in determining disease incidence and mortality [17]. The MPE approach can be used to study any disease. In addition to cancer research, MPE approach can be applied to non-neoplastic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, obesity, diabetes mellitus, drug toxicity, and immunity-related and infectious diseases [18] (Fig. 1) [19].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Interactions of the microbiome, host immune system, and tumor in the microenvironment. The imbalance of microbial communities may cause neoplasms as well as non-neoplastic diseases. J Pathol. 2019 April; 247(5): 615–628. 10.1002/path.5236

Cancer can be regarded as a microenvironmental, systemic, and environmental disease. The exposome (i.e., the totality of exposures), which encompasses diets, supplements, smoking, alcohol, other lifestyle factors, medications, etc., likely alters the microbiome (inclusive of bacteria, viruses, archaea, fungi, parasites, etc.) and immune system in various body sites and influences tumor phenotypes (Fig. 2) [20].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Cancer as a microenvironmental, systemic, and environmental disease. Tumor generates its intrinsic microenvironment, where tumor cells interact with immune cells, microbes, and other cells as well as non-cellular components. Gut 2022; 71:2107–2122

These factors may vary in each person differentially, which can explain differences in disease outcomes and responses to treatment. The evolving field of MPE can be a core field in the era of big-data health science and precision medicine.

Intestinal bacteria-derived metabolites and the intracellular signaling targets

Gut bacteria metabolites include short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), secondary bile acids (SBAs), indole derivatives, and trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO). There are research data that strongly link the microbiota metabolites to the carcinogenesis process and the competency of the anti-cancer therapy [21].

  1. LPS (Lipopolysaccharide): It is a cell wall component of the gram-negative bacteria [22]. Lipid A component is the main toxic element [23]. Upon the death of bacteria, LPS is liberated into the intestinal environment, then to the bloodstream [24]. There is a significant link between LPS derived from gut bacteria and molecules related to anti-cancer targeted therapies. Zhu et al. [25] demonstrated that LPS activates Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/NF-κB pathway in colonic cancer (CRC) cells. Consequently, via the increase in VEGFR-3 transcription, CRC increases its invasion capability. In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells, LPS stimulates the elevation of EREG expression in tumor tissues, and through IL-8 signaling, there is enhancement of tumor angiogenesis which promotes migration and invasion [26]. LPS activates the mTOR/NF-κB pathway by enhancing TLR4/MyD88/MAPK signaling [27]. Additionally, LPS stimulates the mTOR/STAT3 pathway [28]. Consequently, both receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway have been enhanced, hindering antitumor therapies’ effect that target this signaling pathway.

  2. Secondary bile acids: They include deoxycholic acid (DCA), lithocholic acid (LCA), and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) [29]. They are essential for lipid digestion and absorption, and activate specific receptors such as FXR and GPCRs, which significantly impact energy metabolism and immune modulation [29, 30]. Gut microbiota has the ability to synthesis secondary bile acids. However, Eubacterium lentum converts bile acids especially to UDCA. Additionally, other gut bacteria like Bacteroides, Faecalibacterium, and Ruminococcus also produce secondary bile acids, influencing specific targets and exacerbate several diseases [31]. Secondary bile acids have the ability to influence RTKs expression [32, 33]. In rat HCC cells, DCA induce phosphorylation of the EGFR leading to the upregulation of mucin 2 (MUC2) and facilitation of cancer invasion [34]. A high-fat diet (HFD) increases levels of the microbial metabolite DCA, which activates VEGFR2 signaling and contributes to high rate of colon cancer. Conversely, DCA may also directly target HER2, potentially exerting an anti-cancer effect. DCA could inhibit antitumor therapies aimed at RTKs and HER2. Apoptosis, whatever its cause, can be aborted by UDCA denoting a probable role in cancer prevention [35]. UDCA not only inhibits the activation of the EGFR/ERK pathway, which reduces the proliferation of malignant cells, but it also suppresses the expression of PI3K and AKT, further supporting its anti-tumor properties in these cells [36]. Additionally, UDCA can block IGF-1-induced activation of AKT and ERK, which are crucial pathways for regulating the growth of cholangiocarcinoma cells [37]. In the context of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), UDCA enhance the sorafenib-induced downregulation of phospho-STAT3, thereby amplifying its inhibitory effect on tumor growth [38]. Overall, UDCA may improve anti-tumor therapies that target RTKs, STAT, and the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway (Fig. 3).

  3. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA): Gut microbiota ferment the indigestible dietary fibers to produce SCFAs, such as acetic acid derivation, propionate, and butyrate [39]. The abundance of SCFA-producing microbiota in the intestine, along with dietary fiber consumption, influences the concentration of SCFAs in both stool and plasma [39, 40]. Microbes that produce butyrate primarily consist of bacteria from the families Ruminalococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae, along with species such as Anaerobutyricum hallii and Anaerostipes spp. [41–43]. In differentiate, acetic acid derivatives and propionate are predominantly produced by Bifidobacterium and mucin-degrading microorganisms, including Akkermansia muciniphila [44]. Butyrate is accepted to play a noteworthy part within the event [45], advancement, and treatment of tumors. Butyrate serves as a crucial energy source for colonic epithelial cells and also regulates gene expression by inhibiting histone deacetylase (HDAC) [46, 47], subsequently influencing cell expansion, differentiation, and apoptosis. Additionally, butyrate serves as a local signaling molecule within the cellular digestion system [48], influencing tumor cells and playing a crucial role in modulating the tumor microenvironment and immune response [49, 50]. It has been demonstrated that butyrate downregulates VEGF expression in a dose-dependent manner [51, 52]. By reducing VEGF expression and angiogenesis, butyrate effectively decreases tumor metastasis [53]. Furthermore, butyrate inhibits the VEGF and JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathways, thereby exerting anti-tumor effects. Dariushnejad et al. [54] discovered that sodium butyrate, at a specific concentration, enhanced the expression of VEGFR2 and several proteins associated with angiogenesis, including NOx, AKT, ERK1/2, and VEGF-A. According to the tumor type, butyrate has distinctive impact. SCFAs have a regulatory role in the expression of human insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), a pivotal hormone for substantial development, however a negative role in prostate cancer. Matsushita et al. [55] illustrated that SCFA-induced IGF-1 generation from intestine microbes impacts prostate cancer development by activating neighborhood prostate MAPK and PI3K signaling pathways, subsequently proposing the presence of a intestine microbiota-IGF-1-prostate hub. Furthermore, Yan et al. discovered that short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) elevate systemic levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), thereby playing a role in bone structure and development [56]. Generally, SCFAs had been proposed to impact illness progression by directing the expression of VEGF.

  4. Trimethylamine oxidase (TMAO): TMAO is a metabolite produced by intestinal bacteria and the liver [57]. It is formed by intestinal flora from dietary components such as choline, lecithin, and carnitine, which are primarily derived from sources like meat, fish, and eggs. TMA is absorbed in the intestines and carried through the portal circulation to the liver, where it is converted into TMAO [58]. TMAO serves numerous natural capacities, such as cholesterol metabolism and atherosclerosis regulation, in addition to a potential role in expanded risk of cardiovascular illness [59]. TMAO is included within the control of VEGF expression [60, 61]. Moreover, TMAO influences tumor expansion by means of other targets as in activation of ILK/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway [62]. Through the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway in endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), TMAO enhances the expression of cytokines and adhesion molecules. This mechanism can participate in cases of chronic illness such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and chronic kidney diseases [63]. TMAO enhances the protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK)/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway [64]. It exerts a harmful influence in cancer by targeting the VEGF, PI3K, NF-κB, and PERK/Akt/mTOR pathways.

  5. Indole: It affects gastrointestinal motility causing intermittent bowel habits whether diarrhea or constipation [65, 66]. Gut bacteria partially metabolize dietary tryptophan into indole and its derivatives, which include ligands for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), such as indole, indole aldehyde (IAld), and indole acrylic acid [67]. These indole derivatives influence cancer development and progression through the activation of AhR [68–70]. Furthermore, they impact disease mechanisms by targeting the PI3K/AKT pathway and STAT3.

  6. Others: Certain metabolites produced by gut bacteria can activate receptors such as NF-κB, PI3K/AKT, and ErbB2/ErbB3, which may play a role in the onset of cancers, including colon cancer. Metabolites from F. nucleatum and Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF) have been found to be prevalent in the intestines of colorectal cancer patients, facilitating the activation of the STAT3 and NF-κB signaling pathways [71]. Conversely, metabolites from lactobacillus casei have been shown to inhibit the expression of ErbB-2 and ErbB-3 genes, thereby reducing tumor proliferation associated with these receptors [72]. Additionally, the production of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) by gut microbiota can modulate VEGF expression, thus affecting tumor progression [73, 74] Fig. 4.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Secondary bile acids and their targets. DCA could inhibit antitumor therapies aimed at RTKs and HER2. UDCA inhibits both the activation of the EGFR/ERK pathway, which reduces the proliferation of malignant cells, and suppresses the expression of PI3K and AKT, further supporting its anti-tumor properties in these cells. Overall, UDCA may improve anti-tumor therapies that target RTKs, STAT, and the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Published by He et al. in Mol Med 31, 58 (2025)

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

SCFAs, TMAO, and indole derivatives with various targets. Butyrate downregulates VEGF expression and inhibits the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathways, thereby exerting anti-tumor effects. Indole derivatives impact disease mechanisms by targeting the PI3K/AKT pathway and STAT3. SCFAs elevate systemic levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). TMAO influences tumor expansion by means of other targets as in the activation of the ILK/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Through the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway, TMAO enhances the expression of cytokines and adhesion molecules. Published by He et al. in Mol Med 31, 58 (2025)

Inter-relation between gut microbiota, metabolites, and target therapy

By modulating the critical signaling pathways associated with tumorigenesis, intestinal bacteria and their metabolites may improve the effectiveness of targeted therapies. This enhancement can occur through various mechanisms:

I. Effects of targeted anticancer therapy on gut microbiota

Diarrhea, a common side effect of targeted therapies, is closely associated with dysbiosis of gut bacteria. In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line treatment with anti-VEGF agents (bevacizumab) or anti-EGFR agents (cetuximab), the levels of Klebsiella, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Veillonella species were significantly elevated in the progressive disease (PD) group compared to the partial response (PR) group. In contrast, F. nucleatum and Prevotella species were found to be significantly more prevalent in the PR group than in the PD group [75]. Among patients treated with VEGF-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), those experiencing diarrhea showed increased levels of Bacteroides spp. and decreased levels of Prevotella spp. [76]. Furthermore, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma undergoing treatment with sunitinib, those with diarrhea demonstrated a significantly higher abundance of Bacteroides and a lower presence of butyrate-producing bacteria compared to those without diarrhea [77].

II. Influence of gut microbiota on targeted anticancer therapy

Growth factors attach to their designated receptors, initiating intracellular signals that are conveyed to cells through a series of signaling pathways, thereby influencing their growth and differentiation. There are two primary intracellular pathways: the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway and the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) family. The STAT family functions downstream of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Ras/MAPK, and JAK pathways. Tofacitinib inhibits the activity of JAK enzymes, which decreases the phosphorylation of STAT proteins, thus disrupting signaling pathways and contributing to the deceleration of tumor progression while enhancing patient prognosis [78].

III. Influence of gut microbiota on targeted drug resistance

For targeted therapies to be effective, it is essential that the medicinal compounds are retained within the cell and successfully avoid being expelled by efflux transporter proteins [79]. The intestinal microbiota and their metabolites can affect the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family, including P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and MDR1 [80, 81], which may contribute to the development of resistance to targeted medications in humans. A nanoparticle model has been developed [82]. The combination of butyrate and bile acids has been shown to enhance the expression of P-gp by either promoting the activity of transcription factors that stimulate P-gp transcription or inhibiting those that suppress it [83]. This illustrates how intestinal bacteria and their metabolites can lead to resistance against targeted therapies.

Even with new discoveries, challenges remain. Analyzing microbes in patient samples is technically hard. Results differ between groups of people. Studies often have too few participants. There is a disconnect between studying microbes and looking at health patterns. We need to test animal findings in actual human tumors. Large prospective studies in people are also necessary. Few researchers have broad skills. Early cancers in the food pipe and airways suggest the gut’s role.

Conclusion

The gut microbiome and its metabolites are crucial in cancer treatment through various mechanisms. Alterations in gut flora can lead to treatment-related side effects, potentially affecting patient responses and the development of drug resistance. Therefore, understanding changes in gut microbiota may reveal new strategies for enhancing cancer treatment outcomes, reducing side effects, and addressing drug resistance. The gut microbiome and its metabolites interact with several cellular proteins, such as VEGFR, EGFR, and HER2. They influence numerous intracellular signaling pathways associated with cancer treatment, either directly or indirectly, thereby affecting cancer growth, metastasis, and therapeutic responses. Additionally, gut bacteria may impact drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, subsequently influencing treatment efficacy by modulating the expression of drug transporter proteins.

Abbreviations

SCFA

Short-chain fatty acids

SBA

Secondary bile acids

MPE

Molecular pathologic epidemiology

TMAO

Trimethylamine-N-oxide

VEGFR

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor

EGFR

Epidermal growth factor receptor

HER2

Human epidermal receptor 2

IGF-1R

Insulin growth factor 1 receptor

CRC

Colorectal carcinoma

HCC

Hepatocellular carcinoma

NF-κB

Nuclear factor Kappa B

TLR4

Toll like receptor 4

LPS

Lipopolysaccharide

RTKs

Receptor tyrosine kinases

HDAC

Histone deacetylase

PI3K

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase

PKB

Protein kinase B

mTOR

Mechanistic target of rapamycin

STAT

Signal transducer and activator of transcription

PERK

Protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Maged T Elghannam, Moataz H Hassanien. Data curation: Maged T Elghannam, Mohammed D EL-Talkawy, Gamal ELattar. Formal analysis: Moataz H Hassanien, Ahmed ELRay. Funding acquisition: NA. Investigation: NA. Methodology: Maged T Elghannam, Emad Turky. Article administration: Ahmed ELRay. Resources: NA. Software: Yosry A Ameen. Supervision: Maged T Elghannam, Mohammed D EL-Talkawy, Gamal ELattar. Validation: Yosry A Ameen, Mohammed D EL-Talkawy, Emad Turky. Visualization: Moataz H Hassanien, Ahmed ELRay. Writing – review & editing: All authors. Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Funding

No funds.

Data availability

All data are cited inside the manuscript.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

NA as there are no patients involved.

Consent for publication

NA.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.O’Hara AM, Shanahan F. The gut flora as a forgotten organ. EMBO Rep. 2006;7:688–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wu M, Tian C, Zou Z, Jin M, Liu H. Gastrointestinal microbiota in gastric cancer: potential mechanisms and clinical applications—a literature review. Cancers. 2024;16:3547. 10.3390/cancers16203547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 3.Perler BK, Friedman ES, Wu GD. The role of the gut microbiota in the relationship between diet and human health. Annu Rev Physiol. 2023;85:449–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Park EM, et al. Targeting the gut and tumor microbiota in cancer. Nat Med. 2022;28:690–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bik EM, Eckburg PB, Gill SR, Nelson KE, Purdom EA, Francois F, et al. Molecular analysis of the bacterial microbiota in the human stomach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:732–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.He J, Chen, Zhao H. et al. The interplay between gut bacteria and targeted therapies: implications for future cancer treatments. Mol Med. 2006;31:58. 10.1186/s10020-025-01108-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7.Baker JL, Mark Welch JL, Kauffman KM, McLean JS, He X. The oral microbiome: diversity, biogeography and human health. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2024;22:89–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Woo YR, Cho SH, Lee JD, Kim HS. The human microbiota and skin cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. 10.3390/ijms23031813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guo W, Wang H, Li C. Signal pathways of melanoma and targeted therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tiwari A, Saraf S, Verma A, Panda PK, Jain SK. Novel targeting approaches and signaling pathways of colorectal cancer: an insight. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24:4428–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sitohy B, Nagy JA, Dvorak HF. Anti-VEGF/VEGFR therapy for cancer: reassessing the target. Cancer Res. 2012;72:1909–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhou J, Ji Q, Li Q. Resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer: underlying mechanisms and reversal strategies. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40:328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Meric-Bernstam F, et al. Advances in HER2-targeted therapy: novel agents and opportunities beyond breast and gastric cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:2033–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tzanakakis GN, et al. The role of IGF/IGF-IR-signaling and extracellular matrix effectors in bone sarcoma pathogenesis. Cancers (Basel). 2021. 10.3390/cancers13102478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhong L, et al. Small molecules in targeted cancer therapy: advances, challenges, and future perspectives. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lim ZF, Ma PC. Emerging insights of tumor heterogeneity and drug resistance mechanisms in lung cancer targeted therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12:134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Campbell PT, Ambrosone CB, Nishihara R, Aerts HJWL, Bondy M, Chatterjee N, et al. Proceedings of the fourth international molecular pathological epidemiology (MPE) meeting. Cancer Causes Control. 2019;30(8):799–811. 10.1007/s10552-019-01177-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ogino S, Nishihara R, VanderWeele TJ, Wang M, Nishi A, Lochhead P, et al. Review article: the role of molecular pathological epidemiology in the study of neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases in the era of precision medicine. Epidemiology. 2016;27:602–11. 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hamada T, Nowak JA, Milner DA Jr, Song M, Ogino S. Integration of microbiology, molecular pathology, and epidemiology: a new paradigm to explore the pathogenesis of microbiome-driven neoplasms. J Pathol. 2019;247(5):615–28. 10.1002/path.5236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Inamura K, Hamada T, Bullman S, Ugai T, Yachida S, Ogino S. Cancer as microenvironmental, systemic and environmental diseases: opportunity for transdisciplinary microbiomics science. Gut. 2022;71:2107–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Meng C, Bai C, Brown TD, Hood LE, Tian Q. Human gut microbiota and gastrointestinal cancer. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2018;16:33–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rathinam VAK, Zhao Y, Shao F. Innate immunity to intracellular LPS. Nat Immunol. 2019;20:527–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang X, Quinn PJ. Lipopolysaccharide: biosynthetic pathway and structure modification. Prog Lipid Res. 2010;49:97–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Banaszak M, Górna I, Woźniak D, Przysławski J, Drzymała-Czyż S. Association between gut dysbiosis and the occurrence of SIBO, LIBO, SIFO and IMO. Microorganisms. 2023. 10.3390/microorganisms11030573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhu G, et al. LPS upregulated VEGFR-3 expression promote migration and invasion in colorectal cancer via a mechanism of increased NF-κB binding to the promoter of VEGFR-3. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2016;39:1665–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kubo T, et al. Role of epiregulin on lipopolysaccharide-induced hepatocarcinogenesis as a mediator via EGFR signaling in the cancer microenvironment. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. 10.3390/ijms25084405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhou M, et al. Boosting mTOR-dependent autophagy via upstream TLR4-MyD88-MAPK signalling and downstream NF-κB pathway quenches intestinal inflammation and oxidative stress injury. EBioMedicine. 2018;35:345–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li L, Wan G, Han B, Zhang Z. Echinacoside alleviated LPS-induced cell apoptosis and inflammation in rat intestine epithelial cells by inhibiting the mTOR/STAT3 pathway. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;104:622–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Guzior DV, Quinn RA. Review: microbial transformations of human bile acids. Microbiome. 2021;9:140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Winston JA, Theriot CM. Diversification of host bile acids by members of the gut microbiota. Gut Microbes. 2020;11:158–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cai J, Sun L, Gonzalez FJ. Gut microbiota-derived bile acids in intestinal immunity, inflammation, and tumorigenesis. Cell Host Microbe. 2022;30:289–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yoon JH, Higuchi H, Werneburg NW, Kaufmann SH, Gores GJ. Bile acids induce cyclooxygenase-2 expression via the epidermal growth factor receptor in a human cholangiocarcinoma cell line. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:985–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Werneburg NW, Yoon JH, Higuchi H, Gores GJ. Bile acids activate EGF receptor via a TGF-alpha-dependent mechanism in human cholangiocyte cell lines. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2003;285:G31-36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Qiao L, et al. Deoxycholic acid (DCA) causes ligand-independent activation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and FAS receptor in primary hepatocytes: inhibition of EGFR/mitogen-activated protein kinase-signaling module enhances DCA-induced apoptosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12(9):2629–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liu H. Ursodeoxycholic acid induces apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma xenografts in mice. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(36):10367–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lee J, et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid shows antineoplastic effects in bile duct cancer cells via apoptosis induction; p53 activation; and EGFR-ERK, COX-2, and PI3K-AKT pathway inhibition. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48:6231–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lee J, et al. Metformin induces apoptosis and inhibits proliferation through the AMP-activated protein kinase and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor pathways in the bile duct cancer cells. J Cancer. 2019;10:1734–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lee S, et al. Synergistic effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on the antitumor activity of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma cells via modulation of STAT3 and ERK. Int J Mol Med. 2018;42:2551–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Koh A, De Vadder F, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Bäckhed F. From dietary fiber to host physiology: short-chain fatty acids as key bacterial metabolites. Cell. 2016;165:1332–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tan J, et al. The role of short-chain fatty acids in health and disease. Adv Immunol. 2014;121:91–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Martin-Gallausiaux C, Marinelli L, Blottière HM, Larraufie P, Lapaque N. SCFA: mechanisms and functional importance in the gut. Proc Nutr Soc. 2021;80:37–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hou H, et al. Gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids and colorectal cancer: ready for clinical translation? Cancer Lett. 2022;526:225–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Trompette A, et al. Gut-derived short-chain fatty acids modulate skin barrier integrity by promoting keratinocyte metabolism and differentiation. Mucosal Immunol. 2022;15:908–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.de Vos WM, Tilg H, Van Hul M, Cani PD. Gut microbiome and health: mechanistic insights. Gut. 2022;71:1020–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.O’Keefe SJ. Diet, microorganisms and their metabolites, and colon cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13:691–706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li G, et al. Microbiota metabolite butyrate constrains neutrophil functions and ameliorates mucosal inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut Microbes. 2021;13:1968257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bridgeman S, Woo HC, Newsholme P, Mamotte C. Butyrate lowers cellular cholesterol through HDAC inhibition and impaired SREBP-2 signalling. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. 10.3390/ijms232415506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tian P, et al. Early life gut microbiota sustains liver-resident natural killer cells maturation via the butyrate-IL-18 axis. Nat Commun. 2023;14:1710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Liu H, et al. Butyrate: a double-edged sword for health? Adv Nutr. 2018;9:21–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Stilling RM, et al. The neuropharmacology of butyrate: the bread and butter of the microbiota-gut-brain axis? Neurochem Int. 2016;99:110–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sawa H, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors such as sodium butyrate and trichostatin A inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion from human glioblastoma cells. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2002;19:77–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pellizzaro C, Coradini D, Daidone MG. Modulation of angiogenesis-related proteins synthesis by sodium butyrate in colon cancer cell line HT29. Carcinogenesis. 2002;23:735–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Prasanna Kumar S, Thippeswamy G, Sheela ML, Prabhakar BT, Salimath BP. Butyrate-induced phosphatase regulates VEGF and angiogenesis via Sp1. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008;478:85–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dariushnejad H, Pirzeh L, Roshanravan N, Ghorbanzadeh V. Sodium butyrate and voluntary exercise through activating VEGF-A downstream signaling pathway improve heart angiogenesis in type 2 diabetes. Microvasc Res. 2023;147:104475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Matsushita M, et al. Gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids promote prostate cancer growth via IGF1 signaling. Cancer Res. 2021;81:4014–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yan J, et al. Gut microbiota induce IGF-1 and promote bone formation and growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:E7554-e7563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gatarek P, Kaluzna-Czaplinska J. Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) in human health. EXCLI J. 2021;20:301–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Querio G, Antoniotti S, Geddo F, Levi R, Gallo MP. Modulation of endothelial function by TMAO, a gut microbiota-derived metabolite. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. 10.3390/ijms24065806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wang Z, Zhao Y. Gut microbiota derived metabolites in cardiovascular health and disease. Protein Cell. 2018;9:416–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yang S, et al. Trimethylamine N-oxide promotes cell proliferation and angiogenesis in colorectal cancer. J Immunol Res. 2022. 10.1155/2022/7043856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhou C, et al. Trimethylamine N-oxide promotes the proliferation and migration of hepatocellular carcinoma cell through the MAPK pathway. Discover Oncol. 2024;15:346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wu Y, et al. Integrated analysis reveals the gut microbial metabolite TMAO promotes inflammatory hepatocellular carcinoma by upregulating POSTN. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:840171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Seldin MM, et al. Trimethylamine N-oxide promotes vascular inflammation through signaling of mitogen-activated protein kinase and nuclear factor-κb. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016. 10.1161/JAHA.115.002767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kapetanaki S, Kumawat AK, Persson K, Demirel I. The fibrotic effects of TMAO on human renal fibroblasts is mediated by NLRP3, caspase-1 and the PERK/Akt/mTOR pathway. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. 10.3390/ijms222111864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Su X, Gao Y, Yang R. Gut microbiota-derived tryptophan metabolites maintain gut and systemic homeostasis. Cells. 2022. 10.3390/cells11152296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Liu Y, et al. Indole metabolites and colorectal cancer: gut microbial tryptophan metabolism, host gut microbiome biomarkers, and potential intervention mechanisms. Microbiol Res. 2023;272:127392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Agus A, Planchais J, Sokol H. Gut microbiota regulation of tryptophan metabolism in health and disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23:716–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wang L, et al. Black rice diet alleviates colorectal cancer development through modulating tryptophan metabolism and activating AHR pathway. Imeta. 2024;3:e165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Li Y, et al. Bifidobacterium breve-derived indole-3-lactic acid ameliorates colitis-associated tumorigenesis by directing the differentiation of immature colonic macrophages. Theranostics. 2024;14:2719–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ichisaka Y, Yano S, Nishimura K, Niwa T, Shimizu H. Indoxyl sulfate contributes to colorectal cancer cell proliferation and increased EGFR expression by activating AhR and Akt. Biomed Res. 2024;45:57–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wu S, et al. A human colonic commensal promotes colon tumorigenesis via activation of T helper type 17 T cell responses. Nat Med. 2009;15:1016–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Faghfoori Z, et al. Prophylactic effects of secretion metabolites of dairy lactobacilli through downregulation of ErbB-2 and ErbB-3 genes on colon cancer cells. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2020;29:201–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Strandwitz P, et al. GABA-modulating bacteria of the human gut microbiota. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:396–403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Fava G, et al. Gamma-aminobutyric acid inhibits cholangiocarcinoma growth by cyclic AMP-dependent regulation of the protein kinase A/extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 pathway. Cancer Res. 2005;65:11437–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Chen YC, et al. Gut microbiota composition in chemotherapy and targeted therapy of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Front Oncol. 2022;12:955313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Secombe KR, et al. Diarrhea induced by small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors compared with chemotherapy: potential role of the microbiome. Integr Cancer Ther. 2020;19:1534735420928493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Su Z, Lu L, Chen F, Chen J, Chen X. Gut microbiota and sunitinib-induced diarrhea in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a pilot study. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;13:8663–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Alzahrani AS. PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhibitors in cancer: at the bench and bedside. Semin Cancer Biol. 2019;59:125–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Alam A, Locher KP. Structure and mechanism of human ABC transporters. Annu Rev Biophys. 2023;52:275–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Thomas C, Tampé R. Structural and mechanistic principles of ABC transporters. Annu Rev Biochem. 2020;89:605–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Robey RW, et al. Revisiting the role of ABC transporters in multidrug-resistant cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18:452–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mercado-Lubo R, et al. A Salmonella nanoparticle mimic overcomes multidrug resistance in tumours. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Foley SE, et al. Gut microbiota regulation of P-glycoprotein in the intestinal epithelium in maintenance of homeostasis. Microbiome. 2021;9:183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data are cited inside the manuscript.


Articles from Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES