Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1972 Apr;222(1):161–186. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009792

Electrical properties of white and red muscle fibres of the elasmobranch fish Scyliorhinus canicula

P R Stanfield
PMCID: PMC1331421  PMID: 5037066

Abstract

1. Standard electrophysiological techniques (including a method which controls the membrane potential at a point on a muscle fibre) were used to investigate the electrical properties of white and red muscle fibres of the elasmobranch fish Scyliorhinus canicula.

2. The resting potential of the white fibres in the standard Ringer solution was - 85·2 ± 0·4 mV. That of the red fibres was - 71·1 ± 1·2 mV. The membrane resistance of white fibres was 1588 ± 97 Ω cm2 and that of red fibres was 5410 ± 1070 Ω cm2.

3. White fibres always responded to direct stimulation with an action potential. It proved impossible, with two impaling micro-electrodes, to record action potentials from the red fibres, although on one occasion an abortive spike was seen.

4. The resting membrane of the red fibres seemed less permeable to chloride than was the membrane of the white fibres. However, the resting potassium permeability showed the potential dependence called inward or anomalous rectification in both white and red fibres.

5. White fibres responded to square depolarizing pulses with conductance changes to sodium and, subsequently, to potassium.

6. All red fibres examined with the point voltage clamp showed a delayed increase in potassium conductance on depolarizing.

7. Out of twenty-seven red fibres examined, six showed no sign of having any sodium conductance mechanism. Eight showed large sodium currents on depolarizing, and the remaining thirteen had small sodium currents. It seemed likely that the group of eight fibres might be able to propagate action potentials.

Full text

PDF
161

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADRIAN R. H., FREYGANG W. H. Potassium conductance of frog muscle membrane under controlled voltage. J Physiol. 1962 Aug;163:104–114. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ANDERSEN P., JANSEN J. K., LOYNING Y. Slow and fast muscle fibres in the Atlantic hagfish (Myxine glutinosa). Acta Physiol Scand. 1963 Jan-Feb;57:167–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1963.tb02583.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adrian R. H., Chandler W. K., Hodgkin A. L. Slow changes in potassium permeability in skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1970 Jul;208(3):645–668. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adrian R. H., Chandler W. K., Hodgkin A. L. Voltage clamp experiments in striated muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1970 Jul;208(3):607–644. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Adrian R. H., Freygang W. H. The potassium and chloride conductance of frog muscle membrane. J Physiol. 1962 Aug;163(1):61–103. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Adrian R. H., Peachey L. D. The membrane capacity of frog twitch and slow muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1965 Nov;181(2):324–336. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. BONE Q. PATTERNS OF MUSCULAR INNERVATION IN THE LOWER CHORDATES. Int Rev Neurobiol. 1964;6:99–147. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7742(08)60768-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. BURKE W., GINSBORG B. L. The electrical properties of the slow muscle fibre membrane. J Physiol. 1956 Jun 28;132(3):586–598. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Costantin L. L., Podolsky R. J., Tice L. W. Calcium activation of frog slow muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1967 Jan;188(2):261–271. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Flitney F. W. The volume of the T-system and its association with the sarcoplasmic reticulum in slow muscle fibres of the frog. J Physiol. 1971 Aug;217(1):243–257. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HODGKIN A. L., HOROWICZ P. The influence of potassium and chloride ions on the membrane potential of single muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1959 Oct;148:127–160. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HODGKIN A. L., HUXLEY A. F. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol. 1952 Aug;117(4):500–544. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. HODGKIN A. L., KATZ B. The effect of sodium ions on the electrical activity of giant axon of the squid. J Physiol. 1949 Mar 1;108(1):37–77. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1949.sp004310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. HUTTER O. F., NOBLE D. The chloride conductance of frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1960 Apr;151:89–102. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hagiwara S., Takahashi K. Resting and spike potentials of skeletal muscle fibres of salt-water elasmobranch and teleost fish. J Physiol. 1967 Jun;190(3):499–518. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Heistracher P., Hunt C. C. The relation of membrane changes ot contraction in twitch muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1969 May;201(3):589–611. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hess A. Vertebrate slow muscle fibers. Physiol Rev. 1970 Jan;50(1):40–62. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1970.50.1.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hidaka T., Toida N. Biophysical and mechanical properties of red and white muscle fibres in fish. J Physiol. 1969 Mar;201(1):49–59. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hutter O. F., Warner A. E. The pH sensitivity of the chloride conductance of frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1967 Apr;189(3):403–425. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. KUFFLER S. W., VAUGHAN WILLIAMS E. M. Properties of the 'slow' skeletal muscles fibres of the frog. J Physiol. 1953 Aug;121(2):318–340. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp004949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. KUFFLER S. W., VAUGHAN WILLIAMS E. M. Small-nerve junctional potentials; the distribution of small motor nerves to frog skeletal muscle, and the membrane characteristics of the fibres they innervate. J Physiol. 1953 Aug;121(2):289–317. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp004948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kao C. Y., Stanfield P. R. Actions of some anions on electrical properties and mechanical threshold of frog twitch muscle. J Physiol. 1968 Sep;198(2):291–309. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kuba K. The action of phenol on neuromuscular transmission in the red muscle of fish. Jpn J Physiol. 1969 Dec;19(6):762–774. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.19.762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miledi R., Stefani E., Steinbach A. B. Induction of the action potential mechanism in slow muscle fibres of the frog. J Physiol. 1971 Sep;217(3):737–754. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. NAKAJIMA S., IWASAKI S., OBATA K. Delayed rectification and anomalous rectification in frog's skeletal muscle membrane. J Gen Physiol. 1962 Sep;46:97–115. doi: 10.1085/jgp.46.1.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nakajima S., Hodgkin A. L. Effect of diameter on the electrical constants of frog skeletal muscle fibres. Nature. 1970 Sep 5;227(5262):1053–1055. doi: 10.1038/2271053a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Noble D., Hall A. E. The Conditions for Initiating "All-or-Nothing" Repolarization in Cardiac Muscle. Biophys J. 1963 Jul;3(4):261–274. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(63)86820-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. PEACHEY L. D., HUXLEY A. F. Structural identification of twitch and slow striated muscle fibers of the frog. J Cell Biol. 1962 Apr;13:177–180. doi: 10.1083/jcb.13.1.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Page S. G. A comparison of the fine structures of frog slow and twitch muscle fibers. J Cell Biol. 1965 Aug;26(2):477–497. doi: 10.1083/jcb.26.2.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Peachey L. D. The sarcoplasmic reticulum and transverse tubules of the frog's sartorius. J Cell Biol. 1965 Jun;25(3 Suppl):209–231. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.3.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. SHAMARINA N. M. Electric response of 'tonic' muscle fibres of the frog skeletal musculature. Nature. 1962 Feb 24;193:783–784. doi: 10.1038/193783a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Smith R. S., Lännergren J. Types of motor units in the skeletal muscle of Xenopus laevis. Nature. 1968 Jan 20;217(5125):281–283. doi: 10.1038/217281a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stanfield P. R. The effect of the tetraethylammonium ion on the delayed currents of frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1970 Jul;209(1):209–229. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stefani E., Steinbach A. B. Resting potential and electrical properties of frog slow muscle fibres. Effect of different external solutions. J Physiol. 1969 Aug;203(2):383–401. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Stefani E., Steinbach A. Persistence of excitation contraction coupling in "slow" muscle fibres after a treatment that destroys transverse tubules in "twitch" fibres. Nature. 1968 May 18;218(5142):681–682. doi: 10.1038/218681a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. WEIDMANN S. The electrical constants of Purkinje fibres. J Physiol. 1952 Nov;118(3):348–360. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES