Introduction
The interaction between the oral microbiome and the systemic response to oncological treatment is gaining increasing relevance in personalized medicine (1). Regulation of the tumor microenvironment by host immunity is well documented; in this scenario, the involvement of the microbiota in pharmacological efficacy—a field known as pharmacomicrobiomics—is redefining precision oncology (2). Current evidence shows that bacterial communities not only coexist with the tumor, but that their metabolic pathways directly modulate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antineoplastic agents (2).
In this regard, Fu et al. provided key findings in the management of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), demonstrating that specific oral microbial signatures—characterized by enrichment of Lactobacillus and Neisseria—allow for the prediction of favorable responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (3). These results reflect a complex biological interaction, in which the microbiome modulates tumor progression and therapeutic response through two main mechanisms: systemic immunoinflammatory regulation and remodeling of the tumor microenvironment (1). In contrast, oral dysbiosis—composed predominantly of Prevotella, Clostridia, and Bacteroidetes genera—induces secretion of proinflammatory mediators such as IL-8 and CXCL1 (1). This signaling alters the immune niche by suppressing infiltration and effector activity of CD8+ T lymphocytes, thereby compromising the efficacy of regimens based on epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel (1). The use of this non-invasive analysis allows for stratification of patients by their probability of achieving a favorable clinical response, laying the groundwork for designing strategies aimed at restoring microbial homeostasis and enhancing chemosensitivity (3).
Nevertheless, these intensive cytotoxic regimens damage the epithelial barrier and disrupt oral eubiosis, favoring the development of acute complications such as ulcerative mucositis. This condition increases the risk of systemic infections and is often associated with dose reduction or delays in treatment cycles (4). In the face of this challenge, Petropoulou et al. demonstrated through a randomized clinical trial the effectiveness of telemedicine and mobile applications (e-Health) in the dental field (5). Patients under this interactive remote monitoring displayed a significant reduction in the frequency and severity of oral mucositis, as well as better control of gingivitis and periodontal disease compared to conventional care (5). This care model aligns with what was reported by Mooney et al., (6) who showed that electronic symptom monitoring systems based on patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) reduce symptom burden and improve adherence to chemotherapy (6). Thus, the study by Petropoulou et al. complements Fu et al.‘s approach, showing that preserving oral health in oncology patients requires a dual strategy: microbiological stratification before initiating treatment and real-time digital outpatient support to ensure the continuity of systemic therapy (3, 5).
On another front, optimization of supportive care extends to pediatric oncology, where cytotoxic regimens achieve high survival rates at the cost of chronic sequelae. Among these adverse effects, iron overload secondary to repeated transfusional support constitutes a critical risk factor that compromises tissue homeostasis. In this area, Kamış et al. assessed accumulation of this metal in a pediatric cohort by comparing two indicators: serum ferritin levels and findings from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the T2 star technique (7). Their study demonstrated a notable clinical discrepancy; while blood ferritin behaved as an accessible but nonspecific parameter, being altered by concurrent inflammatory processes, the MRI technique showed high diagnostic accuracy in detecting real iron deposition in hepatic parenchyma (7). Consequently, conventional monitoring with plasma biomarkers is insufficient for predicting the real risk of overload. Kamış et al.‘s work thus underscores the need to incorporate advanced imaging techniques to initiate iron chelation in a timely manner and prevent chronic organ damage in these children (7).
Finally, the sequelae of pediatric oncological therapies are manifested not only systemically, but also permanently compromise maxillofacial growth. In this respect, Krommenhoek et al. presented the radiological tool DENTALE to assess and score late dental and skeletal alterations in survivors of head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma (8). This system precisely records anomalies such as agenesis, microdontia, and deficiencies in root development caused by radiotherapy and chemotherapy during childhood (8). This type of tool directly connects oncological treatment with specialized dental practice, facilitating comprehensive therapeutic planning (8).
In conclusion, the articles in this Research Topic demonstrate that current oncological success must include the preservation of long-term quality of life. This requires a continuous model linking initial microbiological stratification, interactive digital monitoring during active treatment, and radiological monitoring of chronic sequelae, ensuring truly personalized clinical support.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Paola L. Acevedo-Quezada, periodontist, who conducted the critical review and provided suggestions on microbiology and dysbiosis, strengthening the microbiological and oral focus of this manuscript.
Editorial on the Research Topic Understanding oral health challenges in pediatric and adult cancer care
Footnotes
Edited and reviewed by: Jaume Mora, Sant Joan de Déu Hospital, Spain
Author contributions
RG-G: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KS: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors RG-G, KS declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1. Wang J, Xu D, Hu S, Zheng B, Chen Y, Pan T. The impact of microbiome on breast cancer and regulatory strategies. Microorganisms. (2026) 14:75. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms14010075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Le Ngoc K, Pham TTH, Nguyen TK, Huong PT. Pharmacomicrobiomics in precision cancer therapy: bench to bedside. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1428420. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1428420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Fu X, Huang Z, Li Z, Chen Z, Wu Z, Yang Q, et al. Oral microbiome components predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer patients. Front Oncol. (2025) 15:1546044. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1546044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Elad S, Cheng KKF, Lalla RV, Yarom N, Hong C, Logan RM, et al. MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy. Cancer. (2020) 126:4423–31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Petropoulou P, Govina O, Kalemikerakis I, Artopoulou II. A randomized controlled trial of telemedicine and e-health interventions for the management of oral complications in oncology patients undergoing antineoplastic therapy. Front Oncol. (2026) 16:1774001. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1774001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mooney K, Gullatte M, Iacob E, Alekhina N, Nicholson B, Sloss EA, et al. Essential components of an electronic patient-reported symptom monitoring and management system: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. (2024) 7:e2433153. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Çalışkan Kamış Ş, Çil M, Yağcı B, Karagün BŞ. Evaluation of iron accumulation during childhood cancer treatment. Front Pediatr. (2025) 13:1619659. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1619659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Krommenhoek KB, Hoogeveen RC, Foster-Thomas E, Fennis WM, San Giorgi FJMJ, Krasin M, et al. DENTALE: a validated Dentofacial EvaluatioN Tool to standardize radiological Assessment of Late dental and maxillofacial adverse Effects following treatment for pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma. Front Pediatr. doi: 10.3389/fped.2026.1797184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
