Skip to main content
Journal of Advanced Research logoLink to Journal of Advanced Research
. 2025 Nov 1;85:967–1008. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2025.10.052

Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids: Nanokeys unlocking a new era of precision biomedicine

Zhenhong He a,b,1, Yi Liu c,1, Yihuang Chen d,1, Yuanqun Zhang d, Yuyao Zhang a,b, Zhihong Chen d, Dingsu Bao a,b,⁎, Weihu Yang e,⁎, Huan Liu a,f,⁎
PMCID: PMC13316439  PMID: 41177430

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name ga1.jpg

Keywords: Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids, Nanomedicine, Precision medicine, Tissue repair, Drug delivery

Highlights

  • •

    The review integrates structural, mechanistic, and translational insights of tFNAs across multiple diseases.

  • •

    It highlights pathway-specific regulation linking tFNAs to regenerative outcomes.

  • •

    The review emphasizes tFNAs’ dual role as bioactive molecules and programmable delivery vectors for precision medicine.

  • •

    By comparing cross-disciplinary evidence, this work defines tFNAs as next-generation DNA nanotherapeutics with clinical potential.

Abstract

Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids (tFNAs), a crucial component of DNA nanotechnology, have emerged as versatile tools in biomedical research, largely owing to their distinctive structural features and multifaceted capabilities. Recent studies have highlighted the ability of tFNAs to specifically target biological pathways, facilitate cellular uptake, and enhance therapeutic efficacy. tFNAs also show considerable potential in addressing challenges such as drug resistance and poor bioavailability. However, several challenges, including limited in vivo stability, low drug-loading capacity, and potential long-term toxicity, need to be addressed for successful clinical translation. This review comprehensively explores the latest advancements in tFNAs, focusing particularly on their applications and mechanisms in treating a wide array of diseases. From bone diseases to ophthalmic disorders, tFNAs not only promote bone regeneration but also enhance therapeutic efficacy through targeted drug delivery. They also play a role in combating infectious diseases, skin and soft tissue repair, neurological and mental disorders, hepatorenal diseases, and cancer. In addition, tFNAs have demonstrated significant potential in regenerative medicine, immunomodulation, and gene delivery. This work highlights the future potential of DNA nanotechnology in precision medicine, paving the way for next-generation therapeutic strategies.

Introduction

Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acids (tFNAs), also known as tetrahedral DNA nanostructures (TDNs), are a key innovation in DNA nanotechnology and have attracted increasing attention for their unique structures and broad biomedical applications. tFNAs are three-dimensional structures self-assembled from four carefully designed single-stranded DNAs (ssDNAs) based on the complementary base pairing rules, enabling precise molecular targeting, efficient gene delivery, and diverse therapeutic interventions[1]. tFNAs exhibit numerous advantageous properties, including precise molecular targeting, high biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, non-toxicity, ease of assembly, resistance to nuclease degradation, and remarkable mechanical strength[[2], [3], [4], [5], [6]]. tFNAs can be rapidly internalized by cells via caveolin-mediated endocytosis and, upon functionalization with a nuclear localization signal (NLS), can escape lysosomal degradation, enabling efficient membrane penetration and making them highly effective vectors for drug and gene delivery[4,7,8]. Their stability and favorable biological profile position them as promising candidates for precision medicine, offering potential solutions to longstanding challenges in drug delivery, tissue repair, and disease treatment.

Although the biological functions of DNA and RNA have been extensively studied, the advent of tFNAs represents a remarkable breakthrough that offers distinct advantages over conventional DNA nanostructures. This review systematically summarizes the topic from the perspective of the diverse disease applications of tFNAs, focusing on their structural design and modification strategies, uptake and targeting mechanisms, and regulation of genes and signaling pathways. In addition, it highlights the unique biological advantages and clinical translational potential of tFNAs, while providing an in-depth discussion of their current challenges and future directions. The review not only providesresearchers with a comprehensive understanding of the unique role of tFNAs in nanomedicine but also offers valuable theoretical insights and practical guidance for advancing their clinical translation.

Nucleic acids

In 1869, Swiss scientist Friedrich Miescher first discovered nucleic acids in pus cells and named them “nuclein” due to their presence in the cell nucleus. In 1889, Richard Altmann renamed “nuclein” to “nucleic acid”, although DNA and RNA had not yet been distinguished. In 1929, Phoebus Levene identified the components of DNA, including the four bases A, C, G, and T. In 1944, Oswald Avery, Colin MacLeod, and Maclyn McCarty demonstrated through experiments that DNA could be the carrier of genetic information. In 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick proposed the double-helix model of DNA, where A pairs with T, and C always pairs with G. Between 1961 and 1966, Robert W. Holley et al. deciphered the genetic code. In 1990, sequencing of the human genome began, and in 2001, the complete human genome sequence was published. Since the mid-20th century, nucleic acid research has rapidly advanced, becoming a core area of modern biological and medical research. Today, nucleic acid research is widely applied in fields such as disease diagnosis, gene therapy, and personalized medicine[9].

Nucleic acids can be classified into DNA, RNA, and synthetic nucleic acids, also known as nucleic acid analogs. These compounds are structurally similar to naturally occurring RNA and DNA and include peptide nucleic acid (PNA), morpholino oligonucleotide (MO), locked nucleic acid (LNA), glycol nucleic acid (GNA), and threose nucleic acid (TNA)[[10], [11], [12], [13], [14]]. Each type of nucleic acid has modifications in its molecular backbone that distinguish it from natural DNA or RNA, providing unique advantages for research and applications. The human genome contains approximately 3 billion DNA base pairs, whereas small interfering RNA (siRNA) consists of only 21 nucleotides[15,16]. DNA is generally larger than RNA, as it primarily functions to store genetic information, while RNA plays a more prominent role in information transfer and functional execution[17]. In most cases, naturally occurring DNA molecules are double-stranded, whereas RNA molecules are single-stranded. However, some viruses have double-stranded RNA genomes, while others possess ssDNA genomes[[18], [19], [20]]. There are notable differences in the sugar structure and base composition between these nucleic acids. The key distinction between DNA and RNA lies in the sugar molecules they contain. DNA contains 2′-deoxyribose, while RNA contains ribose. The difference between ribose and deoxyribose lies in the presence of an additional hydroxyl (–OH) group on ribose. Regarding base composition, both DNA and RNA include A, C, and G, but T is found only in DNA, while uracil (U) is found only in RNA.

Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids

Nucleic acids serve as a versatile material for constructing highly controllable and precise nanostructures through a “bottom-up” approach[[21], [22], [23]]. DNA nanotechnology leverages the self-assembly capabilities of DNA molecules to construct nanoscale structures. This technology is based on the Watson-Crick base pairing principle, and by designing specific DNA sequences, it allows the construction of two-dimensional and three-dimensional architectures, ranging from simple to highly complex[[24], [25], [26], [27]]. Since DNA nanotechnology was first introduced by Nadrian Seeman in the 1980 s, it has made significant progress, particularly in drug delivery, biosensors, and gene therapy[[28], [29], [30], [31]]. DNA nanomaterials are widely utilized in the biomedical field due to their programmable nature, which allows precise control over size and shape[24]. These materials can self-assemble into two-dimensional and three-dimensional structures, such as DNA nanotubes and nanocages, for applications in targeted cancer therapy, drug delivery, or serving as biosensors[24,28,32]. For example, DNA nanotubes modified with folic acid can selectively bind to cell surface receptors and facilitate cellular entry[32].

Nucleic acid molecules exhibit complex mechanical properties. Studies demonstrate that nucleic acids display mechanical flexibility at the scale of several base pairs, whereas they exhibit asymptotic rigidity at extended length scales[20]. This characteristic allows nucleic acids to withstand specific mechanical stresses without structural failure. Under loading forces, nucleic acid molecules exhibit stretching and overstretching transitions, with a twist-stretch coupling mechanism that significantly reinforces their mechanical strength[33]. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal that the structural design of tetrahedral nucleic acids confers high stability. Specifically, flat-vertex and mitered-vertex tetrahedra demonstrate enhanced dynamic motion arising from vertex fluctuations under specific length conditions, suggesting inherent structural flexibility and adaptability[34]. This inherent flexibility may improve their stability when subjected to external forces.

Chu et al.[35] reported that in 90 % human serum at 37°C, ssDNA was degraded significantly within 2 h incubation and almost completely after 4 h. In contrast, under the same conditions, standard double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) remained largely intact (<10 % degraded) even after overnight incubation. The hairpin and dumbbell structures also exhibited superior stability compared to the single-stranded form. DNA origami and other multishelix architectures exhibit superior nuclease resistance compared to linear double-stranded or plasmid DNA, attributed to their tightly packed arrangements[36]. The dense spatial organization of tFNAs minimizes the exposure of free ssDNA, thereby significantly improving nuclease resistance[37]. Molecular topology further modulates resistance, as closed-state DNA tweezers demonstrate enhanced nuclease stability relative to their open-state counterparts[38]. Increased restriction sites and their positioning also amplify nuclease resistance[[39], [40], [41]]. Additionally, DNA nanomaterials such as tFNAs also exhibit excellent serum stability, outperforming linear dsDNA in 10 % fetal bovine serum for up to 42 h[39]. Moreover, enhanced resistance to serum degradation correlates with higher DNA density, shorter chain lengths, and stabilization through extended polyethylene glycol (PEG)[42]. These structural features enable tFNAs to preserve their architectural integrity and functionality when interacting with serum components, a critical attribute for effective drug delivery and biomedical applications. Subsequent studies further confirmed tFNAs’ intracellular stability. Divita Mathur et al.[43] investigated three DNA nanostructures (nanocrosshair, octacrosshair and tetrahedron) through cytoplasmic microinjection into COS-1 monkey kidney epithelial cells. A series of precise experiments were conducted to evaluate the stability of tFNAs in the cytoplasm. Experimentsshowed that nanocrosshair and octacrosshair degrade rapidly in COS-1 cells, with almost complete structural disintegration within 10 min and a half-life of 3–4 min. In contrast, tetrahedral structures maintained their structural integrity for at least 1 h post-injection, demonstrating comparable stability across multiple cell lines, including primary dermal fibroblasts, human astrocytes, human A549 adenocarcinoma cells, and HeLa cervical cancer cells.

The programmability of tFNAs originates from their modular structural design. Researchers can engineer dsDNA edges with tunable lengths to construct size-variable DNA tetrahedra, enabling customization for specific biomedical applications[44]. Utilizing Watson-Crick base pairing or electrostatic interactions, oligonucleotides can be site-specifically conjugated to ssDNA termini[45,46]. In addition to attaching oligonucleotides to one or more vertices of tFNAs, small molecule drugs can also be encapsulated within tFNAs and efficiently delivered into live cells[45]. This structural versatility facilitates static tFNA systems to incorporate functional oligonucleotides and therapeutic payloads, in contrast to dynamic tFNA architectures that integrate stimuli-responsive DNA nanodevices. Such programmable assembly mechanisms underpin tFNAs’ emerging applications in precision medicine, including targeted drug delivery, anticancer therapy, antimicrobial interventions, and tissue regeneration[[46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60]].

Shao et al.[61] evaluated the effects of tFNAs on mouse chondrocytes. Compared with ssDNA, tFNA-treated cells showed specific uptake by chondrocytes, phenotype maintenance and proliferation. Proliferation assays demonstrated that tFNAs exhibited negligible cytotoxicity and promoted cell growth in a concentration-dependent manner. These findings highlight the excellent biocompatibility of tFNAs and their potential to enhance cell growth, with their intracellular stability and editable properties providing a solid basis for further optimization.

When compared with ssDNA and other spatial nanostructures, tFNAs demonstrate superior endocytosis efficiency, which serves as their most distinguishing feature[46]. Fan et al.[4] revealed that tFNAs are internalized via a vesicle protein-mediated pathway and trafficked to lysosomes in a microtubule-dependent manner, whereas functionalization with NLS peptides enables lysosomal escape and efficient nuclear delivery, thereby enhancing their potential in gene therapy. Furthermore, leveraging the innate ability of natural DNA to scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS), tFNAs exhibit a remarkable capacity to mitigate cellular damage, which may contribute to the treatment of degenerative and inflammatory diseases[46].

Bone diseases

Bone diseases represent a diverse group of disorders that profoundly affect human health and quality of life. These conditions present a wide range of complex pathological manifestations, including fractures, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and bone tumors, causing significant patient suffering and imposing a substantial burden on healthcare resources. Traditional diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for bone diseases are often limited by insufficient precision, specificity, and safety, making it challenging to meet the increasing clinical demands. Consequently, researchers have been actively exploring novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Although bone tissue possesses intrinsic remodeling and regenerative capabilities, severe bone injuries or defects often necessitate external interventions to facilitate the repair process. Bone grafting and substitute materials remain the most widely employed strategies for addressing critical bone defects; however, their clinical applications are constrained by challenges such as immune rejection, infection risks, and the limited availability of donor bone sources.

In recent years, tFNAs have shown great promise in bone tissue engineering. Existing studies have demonstrated that tFNAs promote the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and enhance bone regeneration[62,63]. Additionally, they regulate chondrocyte phenotype, maintain cartilage tissue integrity, and stimulate cell proliferation[61,64]. Moreover, tFNAs promote osteogenic differentiation and cellular autophagy by modulating multiple specific signaling pathways, such as phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/AKT/mTOR), Wnt/β-catenin, and mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MAPK/ERK)[[63], [64], [65], [66]]. In bone immune regulation, tFNAs contribute to an improved bone regeneration microenvironment by promoting angiogenesis and M2 macrophage polarization[63,67]. Beyond their intrinsic bioactivity, tFNAs also serve as an efficient delivery system for bioactive molecules. Researchers have employed tFNAs as carriers to achieve the targeted delivery of bioactive molecules, further enhancing bone tissue regeneration[62,63,68]. By promoting osteogenic differentiation, enhancing bone regeneration, and preventing cartilage degradation, tFNAs provide a solid foundation for developing novel bone and cartilage tissue engineering strategies. MSCs are multipotent fibroblast-like cells with remarkable immunomodulatory and tissue repair capabilities, and they can differentiate into osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes[[69], [70], [71], [72], [73]]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that tFNAs promote the osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of various types of MSCs, including but not limited to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), synovial mesenchymal stem cells (SMSCs), periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs), and dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs)[62,63,65,66].

Differentiation of BMSCs

Songhang Li et al.[62] designed a bioswitchable tFNA-based delivery system (stFNA-miR) to transport miR-2861 into BMSCs (Fig. 1a). Once internalized, RNase H triggered miR release, enabling inhibition of histone deacetylase 5 (HDAC5) and subsequent upregulation of runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), which enhanced osteogenic differentiation. In vitro, stFNA-miR significantly increased alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and promoted mineralized nodule formation, while in vivo it accelerated bone defect healing with higher bone mass and collagen deposition.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a Schematic illustration of stFNA-miR promotes osteogenic differentiation. Reproduced form ref.[62] with permission from Wiley, copyright 2021. b Schematic illustration of the preparation of TDN-miR-21-5p nanocomplex and assessment of its in vitro and in vivo effects on osteogenesis and angiogenesis during the process of repairing aging bone tissues. Reproduced form ref.[63] with permission from Wiley, copyright 2024.

In a study on steroid-associated osteonecrosis of the femoral head (SAON), Donghai Li et al.[68] developed an injectable heparin lithium hydrogel for the targeted delivery of MiR335-5p-pendant TDN (MiR@TDNs/Li-hep-gel) to facilitate the repair of critical bone defects in SAON. Long-term corticosteroid (CS) use is a major contributor to SAON, with its pathogenesis linked to bone metabolism disorders, microcirculatory damage, increased osteocyte apoptosis, and abnormal differentiation of BMSCs[[74], [75], [76], [77], [78]]. The inhibition of the Wnt signaling pathway plays a pivotal role in the process[[79], [80], [81], [82]]. Moreover, CS administration can impair femoral head angiogenesis and disrupt microcirculation, while genetic regulation further influences disease onset and progression[68,83]. Currently, treatment strategies for SAON, such as core decompression combined with necrotic bone debridement, have shown some therapeutic benefits. However, the challenge of effectively repairing critical bone defects remains unresolved. BMSC transplantation and biomaterial implantation offer potential solutions, yet each approach presents inherent limitations[84,85]. MiR335-5p targets Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) to suppress its expression, thereby regulating the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs and promoting bone formation[86,87]. Li et al.[68] developed TDNs loaded with miR-335-5p (MiR@TDNs), which were efficiently internalized by BMSCs. MiR@TDNs enhanced BMSC proliferation, reduced apoptosis under corticosteroid stress, and promoted migration. They significantly upregulated ALP activity, increased calcium nodule formation, and reduced lipid accumulation, indicating promotion of osteogenic differentiation while suppressing adipogenesis. Moreover, MiR@TDNs elevated vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion from BMSCs, thereby stimulating endothelial cell (EC) proliferation and angiogenesis. Mechanistically, they activated the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by inhibiting DKK1 and engaged signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling, coordinating osteogenesis and angiogenesis. These findings confirm that tFNAs function as efficient and biocompatible carriers to modulate BMSC fate, thereby promoting osteogenic differentiation and bone regeneration.

In addition to the aforementioned pathways, tFNAs may also exert their effects by activating the AKT and ERK signaling pathways. In the context of aging, the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation capacity of senescent bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (O-BMSCs) decline, while senescent endothelial progenitor cells (O-EPCs) exhibit reduced expression of angiogenesis-related genes, impaired migration, and weakened tube formation ability, posing challenges for bone defect repair[[88], [89], [90], [91]]. The researchers successfully constructed the TDN-miR-21-5p nanocomposite. It showed higher uptake efficiency in O-BMSCs than TDNs alone and significantly enhanced osteogenic differentiation while reducing cellular senescence. Mechanistically, TDN-miR-21-5p activated AKT and ERK signaling pathways, upregulated osteogenesis-related genes (eg, ALP, BMP-2, Col-1, OPN and SATB2), and downregulated senescence-associated genes (eg, p53 and p16), thereby promoting osteogenesis and delaying senescence[63].

In the treatment of infectious bone defects, researchers constructed a 3D-bioprinted hybrid scaffold loaded with a clindamycin (CLI)-TDN complex[92]. TDN-CLI is efficiently internalized by BMSCs and promotes their proliferation, indicating excellent biocompatibility. Additionally, TDN-CLI exhibited potent antibacterial effects, potentially due to the enhanced affinity of CLI for bacteria mediated by TDN, which may help mitigate bacterial resistance. The optimized hybrid scaffold not only inhibits bacterial adhesion and colonization but also promotes BMSC proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. Furthermore, it effectively prevents and treats both early and delayed bone infections, thereby facilitating the repair of infectious bone defects.

Differentiation of chondrocytes

Articular cartilage (AC) lacks blood vessels, nerves, and lymphatic vessels, relying on diffusion from adjacent tissues for nutrition and metabolism[[93], [94], [95], [96]]. This structural characteristic endows AC with unique biomechanical and biochemical properties but also limits its self-repair capacity. The blood supply to cartilage originates from the adjacent vascularized synovium, while chondrocytes themselves exhibit resistance to angiogenesis[93,97]. Additionally, cartilage is not innervated, and consequently, under normal conditions, it does not perceive pain. However, in pathological conditions, such as osteoarthritis (OA), the surrounding tissues may become innervated and more sensitive[96]. Due to the absence of blood and lymphatic vessels, AC primarily relies on synovial fluid diffusion for nutrient exchange[94,98]. However, this diffusion-dependent nutrient supply also severely limits the repair capacity of cartilage. In cases of injury or degenerative diseases, chondrocyte metabolism and function may be significantly impaired. These intrinsic characteristics of AC underscore its essential role in maintaining joint health and function while also revealing its vulnerability and difficulty in repair under pathological conditions. Given the limited self-regenerative capacity of AC, current clinical surgical treatments face significant challenges. Tissue engineering strategies based on MSCs hold promise but require further optimization. SMSCs possess strong chondrogenic potential and play a crucial role in cartilage repair. Their ease of accessibility and cultivation makes them ideal seed cells for cartilage tissue engineering[99,100]. A cartilage regenerative system was developed using a chitosan hydrogel/3D-printed poly(ε-caprolactone) hybrid scaffold incorporating SMSCs and tFNAs, which was injected into the articular cavity (Fig. 2)[101]. During AC regeneration, in addition to mimicking appropriate mechanical strength and porosity, a favorable regenerative microenvironment is essential for promoting MSC proliferation, differentiation, and extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis[102]. Without an appropriate microenvironment, cells within the scaffold cannot sustain optimal proliferative and differentiative capacities[103]. Chitosan is a natural polysaccharide containing amino-glucose groups that are positively charged, allowing it to bind to negatively charged tFNA through electrostatic interactions[104]. The primary components of the cartilage matrix are collagen fibers and proteoglycans, with the latter carrying a high density of fixed negative charges within the collagen fiber network[105]. When tFNAs are injected into the joint cavity, they are repelled by the negatively charged cartilage matrix but recruited by the positively charged chitosan hydrogel, enabling effective utilization of tFNAs and improving the microenvironment for cartilage regeneration[101,104,105]. Extensive experimental evidence has demonstrated that tFNAs promote cell proliferation by upregulating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway[6,106]. Following β-catenin accumulation in the cytoplasm, it is translocated to the nucleus, where it interacts with lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF-1). These findings indicate that tFNAs effectively promote the proliferation of SMSCs by activating the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway[101].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic illustration of the tFNA-centered strategy for articular repair and regeneration. In this research, a cartilage regenerative system was constructed. It consists of a hybrid matrix combining chitosan hydrogel and 3D-printed poly (PCL), which encapsulates synovial mesenchymal stem cells. Then tFNAs are recruited and injected into the articular cavity to facilitate the repair and regeneration process. Reproduced form ref.[101] with permission from Elsevier, copyright 2021.

Chondrocytes, as the only cell type in cartilage tissue, play a crucial role in cell-based cartilage regeneration strategies. Beyond the structural limitations of cartilage, tissue engineering approaches involving chondrocytes are also constrained by limited cell numbers and the loss of chondrocyte phenotype[61]. Chondrocytes are prone to differentiation and phenotypic loss during in vitro expansion, significantly impairing their efficacy in tissue engineering[107,108]. The inherently low proliferative activity of chondrocytes results in poor healing capacity following injury, making cell expansion a major challenge. The regulatory effects of tFNAs on chondrocyte function are fundamental to promoting cartilage repair. tFNAs have been shown to significantly enhance chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation[109]. Additionally, they promote chondrocyte autophagy and energy metabolism by activating the autophagy pathway and reducing oxidative stress, thereby inhibiting chondrocyte apoptosis[110]. Studies have demonstrated that tFNAs effectively facilitate articular cartilage regeneration[47]. Autophagy is a key mechanism by which SMSCs maintain normal physiological functions and respond to pathological conditions. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), SMSCs exhibit resistance to apoptosis induction. Autophagy promotes cell survival by reducing ROS levels and mitigating DNA damage, thus preventing apoptosis[111].

The migration ability of chondrocytes is considered crucial for cartilage repair, as cells need to migrate into damaged tissue spaces to promote defect healing[[112], [113], [114]]. Increasing evidence suggests that extracellular nucleotides play a crucial role in regulating cartilage physiology[115]. The study results indicate that extracellular nucleotides, particularly ADP, ADPβS, and UDPβS, stimulate the migration of differentiated ATDC5 cells. Furthermore, ADP and ADPβS specifically induce the expression of the chondrogenic marker Col2a1. Additionally, P2Y1 and P2Y13 receptors have been identified as potential regulators of chondrocyte migration and differentiation stimulated by ADP and ADPβS[116]. Therefore, future studies could explore linking tFNAs to extracellular nucleotides to regulate chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation.

Pentosan polysulfate (PPS) is a low-molecular-weight heparin-like compound derived semisynthetically from beech wood hemicellulose, exhibiting anticoagulant and fibrinolytic properties[117,118]. PPS effectively reduces cartilage degradation, enhances synovial and subchondral blood flow, and stimulates synthesis of hyaluronic acid and proteoglycans[[117], [118], [119], [120]]. In monolayer culture, PPS decreases proliferation of canine ACs by regulating cell cycle progression, maintaining significantly higher proportions of cells in the G1 phase and correspondingly fewer in the S phase, in a concentration and time dependencies. This anti-proliferative effect likely occurs via short-term suppression of cell cycle regulatory genes, particularly CDK1 and CDK4. Additionally, PPS promotes the chondrogenic phenotype of canine ACs, significantly upregulating Col2A1 mRNA expression and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) synthesis[121].

tFNAs possess excellent delivery capabilities, thus, PPS can potentially be loaded onto nucleic acid tetrahedrons to achieve targeted delivery to articular chondrocytes, thereby increasing local PPS concentrations and enhancing therapeutic efficacy. Compared to ssDNA, which cannot be taken up by cells, tFNAs are rapidly taken up via caveolin-mediated endocytosis in a microtubule-dependent manner[52,122]. Additionally, tFNAs promote proliferation of mouse L929 fibroblasts by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway[6]. β-catenin serves as an essential positive regulator within this pathway[123,124]. Upon accumulation in the cytoplasm, β-catenin translocates to the nucleus and interacts with Lef-1, subsequently promoting cellular proliferation. Furthermore, tFNAs stimulate chondrocyte proliferation through regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases, thereby influencing cell cycle progression[61]. Type II collagen, secreted by chondrocytes into the ECM, is a critical component frequently used as a criterion for evaluating chondrocyte phenotype and function[61]. It has been reported that the Notch signaling pathway plays a significant role in regulating cellular differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis, and organ development[[125], [126], [127], [128]]. Recent studies have also identified abnormalities in the Notch signaling pathway during the in vitro dedifferentiation process of chondrocytes. Initially, tFNAs downregulated the expression of Notch 1, Notch 3, and their target gene Hes1, subsequently activating type II collagen expression, ultimately affecting the typical phenotype and function of chondrocytes in cartilage tissue engineering. The alterations in gene expression are caused by reduced type II collagen synthesis, ultimately affecting the chondrocyte phenotype and functionality. Following 24 h of exposure to tFNAs, chondrocytes exhibit a rounded morphology characteristic of their normal phenotype; this effect appears to involve mechanisms associated with the Notch signaling pathway[61]. Therefore, by regulating the microtubule cytoskeleton, upregulating genes and proteins related to the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, and modulating the Notch signaling pathway, tFNAs effectively maintain chondrocyte morphology and promote their proliferation, addressing dedifferentiation and phenotype loss during in vitro culture.

Differentiation of dental-derived stem cells

PDLSCs originate from periodontal ligament tissues and consist of heterogeneous, non-clonal stromal cell populations, including stem cells with multipotential capabilities, committed progenitors, and differentiated cells[129]. PDLSCs uniquely possess the capacity to differentiate into cementum-like tissue, bone-like tissue, and periodontal ligament-like connective tissue, a characteristic not observed in other MSCs[130]. This multipotent differentiation potential is considered a distinctive characteristic of PDLSCs. They exhibit strong clonality, self-renewal ability, and multipotency, enabling their differentiation into diverse cell lineages such as neural, osteogenic, muscular, and adipogenic tissues under specific induction conditions[[131], [132], [133], [134]].

Moreover, PDLSCs offer advantages over BMSCs as they can be obtained through a simple and minimally invasive procedure and exhibit low immunogenicity[135,136]. PDLSCs demonstrate superior colony-forming ability and higher proliferation rates, making them ideal seed cells for authentic periodontal tissue regeneration in periodontal tissue engineering and repair[66,137,138]. However, the inflammatory microenvironment presents a significant challenge, as pro-inflammatory cytokines not only exacerbate periodontal tissue destruction but also impair periodontal regeneration by inhibiting the osteogenic differentiation and migration of PDLSCs[139,140]. Importantly, tFNAs have demonstrated the ability to modulate inflammatory responses, promote osteogenic and odontogenic differentiation, and enhance migration of PDLSCs and dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), underscoring their therapeutic potential in periodontal regeneration (Fig. 3a)[65,106,141].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

a TDNs regulate the biological behavior of PDLSCs/DPSCs by stimulating their proliferation and promoting odonto/osteogenic differentiation. Reproduced form ref.[65] with permission from Wiley, copyright 2019. b The effect of tFNAs on periodontal tissue under inflammatory conditions. tFNAs can improve inflammation in periodontal tissue, protect periodontal structures, particularly by reducing inflammatory infiltration and inhibiting osteoclast formation, thereby decreasing alveolar bone resorption. Reproduced form ref.[66] with permission from KeAi Communications Co, copyright 2021.

The literature indicates that inflammatory factors can activate osteoclast differentiation, enhance osteoclast function, and inhibit osteoblast activity, resulting in excessive bone resorption[142]. tFNAs exhibit excellent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, mediated by the inhibition of MAPK phosphorylation and regulation of macrophage responses[143]. As key components in the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway, P38, JNK, and ERK can be activated by environmental stress, inflammatory cytokines, and G protein-coupled receptors, inducing inflammation[144]. Zhou et al.[65] reported that tFNAs promote osteogenic differentiation of PDLSCs by regulating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, indicating their potential application for PDLSC-based bone regeneration (Fig. 3a). To further investigate the effect of tFNAs on PDLSCs under inflammatory conditions, Zhou et al.[66] established lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced and ligation-induced inflammatory models in vitro and in vivo. Their findings showed that tFNA treatment increased gene expression levels of ALP and Runx2 and increased the protein expression of osteogenic proteins such as osteopontin (OPN) and Runx2. Furthermore, tFNAs significantly decreased the levels of ROS and inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and IL-1β in PDLSCs. In vivo experiments demonstrated that tFNAs effectively prevented periodontal tissue destruction associated with periodontitis (Fig. 3b).

tFNAs inhibit the inflammatory response of PDLSCs by reducing the expression of inflammatory cytokines and suppressing the activation of the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway, exerting their anti-inflammatory effects. They restore most of the alveolar bone to its normal morphology and promote the migration and osteogenic differentiation of PDLSCs in vitro[66]. Recent evidence demonstrates that tFNAs exhibit notable anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects through modulation of macrophage responses by inhibiting MAPK phosphorylation[143]. These findings are particularly relevant because alveolar bone defect repair typically occurs under conditions of chronic inflammation and infection[145]. In summary, tFNAs effectively promote osteogenic differentiation of PDLSCs and DPSCs under both normal and inflammatory conditions, indicating their potential as a preventive or therapeutic agent for inflammatory bone defects.

Ophthalmic disorders

Ophthalmic disorders exert a profound impact on human visual health, notably including age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic retinopathy (DR). Given the multifaceted limitations inherent in traditional treatment modalities, the necessity to explore novel therapeutic strategies becomes paramount.

Oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in the initiation and progression of retinal diseases[146,147]. Disruption of the balance between ROS and antioxidant scavengers within retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and retinal ECs induces inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cellular degeneration, ultimately impairing blood-retina barrier integrity and retinal neuronal dysfunction[148]. DJ-1, a protein deglycase encoded by the Parkinson’s disease-associated gene 7 (PARK7), is a key redox-sensitive protein. DJ-1 protects cells from oxidative stress-induced damage by regulating transcriptional signaling, scavenging ROS, and maintaining mitochondrial function, making it a promising target for antioxidant therapies. Overexpression of DJ-1 ameliorates high glucose-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in retinal pericytes via modulation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Nrf2 signaling pathways, thus attenuating diabetic retinopathy (DR) progression[149,150]. DJ-1 demonstrates stable expression in the RPE[151]. The deletion of DJ-1 perturbs antioxidant defense mechanisms, resulting in RPE thinning and abnormal electroretinogram (ERG) responses in mice[152]. Attempts have been made to enhance the delivery of small activating RNAs (saRNAs) in vivo using delivery vectors such as lipid nanoparticles and aptamers[153]. Wu et al.[154] developed a tFNA-based delivery system for DJ-1-saRNA, which stabilized the saRNA, enhanced uptake, and improved tissue penetration. By elevating DJ-1 expression in RPE and ECs, tFNAs-DJ-1-saRNA subsequently reduced ROS levels, preserved mitochondrial integrity, enhanced cell viability, and suppressed apoptosis under oxidative stress via ERK and Nrf2 signaling (Fig. 4a).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

a An illustration is provided to show the preparation of the tfnas-dj-1-sarnas complex. additionally, it demonstrates the complex’s anti-oxidative effects on both HUVECs and ARPE-19 cells. Reproduced form ref.[154] with permission from Wiley, copyright 2024. b This figure elucidates the intracellular protective mechanism of tFNAs-miR22 subsequent to its endocytosis into injured RGCs. Reproduced form ref.[171] with permission from Wiley, copyright 2024.

Glaucoma is an irreversible neurodegenerative eye disease and a leading cause of blindness, characterized by progressive damage to retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and their axons, alongside visual field defects and optic nerve atrophy[155]. Conventional glaucoma management focuses on lowering intraocular pressure through pharmacological interventions or surgical procedures to slow disease progression and preserve visual function[156]. However, despite pressure reduction, a significant proportion of patients continue to experience vision loss, ultimately leading to blindness in the absence of effective treatment[157]. Emerging research suggests that non-coding RNAs may contribute to glaucoma pathogenesis through direct or indirect mechanisms[158]. Furthermore, the neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor type 2 (NTRK2) gene, which encodes the Tropomyosin related kinase (TrkB) receptor, has been shown to interact with miR-22[159,160]. A synergistic interaction between tFNAs and miR-22 enhances the neuroprotective effects of the tFNAs-miR-22 complex in damaged retinal neurons. Using tFNAs as carriers for miR-22-3p improves miR-22 delivery to retinal neurons, promotes cell proliferation, and inhibits neuronal apoptosis in the retina[161]. The B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) family plays a central role in apoptosis regulation, comprising both the pro-apoptotic protein BCL-2-associated X (Bax) and the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2[162]. Caspase-3, a pivotal apoptotic effector within the caspase family, serves as a convergence point for multiple apoptotic pathways, initiating caspase cascades associated with both mitochondrial-dependent and death receptor-mediated apoptosis[163]. Notably, Bcl-2 inhibits Caspase-3-induced apoptosis[164]. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a member of the neurotrophin family of trophic factors, plays essential roles in the development, survival, and function of a wide range of neurons[165]. tFNAs-miR22 significantly reduces N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA)-induced apoptosis and modulates the TrkB-BDNF signaling pathway in retinal neurons. It selectively activates TrkB, further influencing the TrkB-BDNF axis and facilitating ERK 1/2 activation, ultimately inhibiting apoptosis through ERK-dependent mechanisms[161]. Additionally, tFNAs-miR-22 enhances BDNF delivery, potentially augmenting TrkB activation, given BDNF’s role in promoting TrkB expression[166]. Furthermore, it activates cAMP-response element binding protein, facilitating the transcription of neuroprotective genes such as BDNF, thereby restoring its expression in damaged RGCs and exerting neuroprotective effects on retinal neurons. tFNAs-miR-22 also reverses NMDA-induced apoptosis in mouse retinal neurons through modulating the TrkB-BDNF signaling axis[161].

Retinal ischemia/reperfusion (RI/R) injury is a major cause of vision impairment and irreversible blindness[167]. As a neural structure reliant on terminal vascular perfusion, the retina is particularly vulnerable to hypoxic-ischemic insults. Ischemic injury caused by vascular occlusion leads to rapid-onset tissue necrosis, often resulting in permanent visual deficits within hours[168]. Emerging evidence reveals that RI/R-related pathologies involve characteristic secondary injury cascades, in which post-reperfusion exacerbates primary damage through complex molecular pathways[169]. This paradoxical phenomenon ultimately drives progressive visual function deterioration despite the restoration of blood flow. Previous studies have identified the progressive loss of RGCs as the primary cause of visual impairment following RI/R injury[170]. By conjugating miR-22 onto tFNAs, researchers have developed a simple and efficient delivery system for RI/R injury treatment. The tFNAs-miR-22 complex demonstrates dual neuroprotective functions by inhibiting RGC apoptosis and promoting their proliferation. Additionally, it enables the safe and efficient delivery of miR-22 to damaged retinal neurons, exerting neuroprotective effects by preventing neuronal loss and facilitating retinal recovery. A synergistic interaction between tFNAs and miR-22 enhances the neuroprotective efficacy of tFNAs-miR-22, enabling a more rapid and active response in damaged retinal neurons. Mechanistically, tFNAs-miR-22 activates the ERK 1/2 signaling pathway, regulating the expression of RGC-protective proteins (eg, RPBMS and SYN) and neuroprotective genes (eg, FTL, NET1 and NUS1). Furthermore, it modulates the balance between anti-apoptotic proteins (eg, Bcl-2) and pro-apoptotic proteins (eg, Caspase-3 and BAX), thereby promoting neuronal survival and mitigating RI/R-induced damage (Fig. 4b)[171].

Pathological retinal neovascularization (RNV) diseases involve complex pathophysiological processes driven by an imbalance between pro-angiogenic factors and angiogenesis inhibitors within the retina, ultimately leading to severe visual impairment[172,173]. The retinal neurovascular unit refers to the functional coupling and interdependence among neurons, glial cells, and vascular cells within the inner retinal layers, playing a critical role in maintaining retinal homeostasis and function[174,175]. These diseases not only involve vascular pathology but are also associated with neuronal dysfunction, which can impede visual recovery even after neovascularization occurs[176]. Current therapeutic strategies present inherent limitations. While laser photocoagulation remains a therapeutic option, its clinical application is restricted by complications associated with thermal retinal injury[177]. Although intravitreal anti-VEGF agents have become the first-line therapy for retinal neovascular disorders due to their targeted pharmacological effects, emerging evidence suggests that prolonged VEGF inhibition may elicit paradoxical pathological responses[[178], [179], [180], [181], [182]]. Mechanistic studies indicate that VEGF signaling blockade disrupts physiological vascular homeostasis, impairing both developmental angiogenesis and neurovascular coupling mechanisms[181,182]. Post-treatment evaluations reveal persistent retinal ischemia, characterized by progressive vascular bed deterioration, highlighting the necessity for novel therapeutic strategies that simultaneously suppress neovascularization and preserve vascular integrity. The high recurrence rate of RNV in preterm neonates and individuals with diabetes mellitus underscores the incomplete efficacy of current pharmacotherapies in achieving long-term disease remission[181,183]. Quercetin (QUE), a natural flavonoid compound, exhibits various biological activities, including anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, and anti-tumor properties[184,185]. However, its clinical application is limited by poor solubility in physiological media, low bioavailability, and instability, necessitating strategies to enhance these properties. tFNAs also possess anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties by modulating the MAPK and nuclear transcription factor-κB (NF-κB) pathways, mechanisms similar to those of QUE[186]. Jin et al.[187] developed tFNA-based quercetin delivery system (tFNA-QUE) for ischemic retinopathy. tFNA-QUE inhibited vascular endothelial cell (VEC) proliferation, migration, and tube formation in vitro, and in oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) models it suppressed RNV, reduced retinal non-perfusion, and preserved neuronal morphology and function. Mechanistically, it regulates the AKT/nuclear factor erythroid-derived 2-related factor 2/heme oxygenase-1 (AKT/Nrf2/HO-1) signaling pathway, to exert antioxidant and anti-angiogenic effects, thereby protecting the retinal neurovascular unit (NVU). Beyond ischemic retinopathy, tFNAs also exhibit therapeutic efficacy in promoting corneal epithelial regeneration and mitigating oxidative damage in retinal ganglion cells[188,189]. In a proof-of-concept study, Zhou et al.[190] demonstrated that tFNAs can safely and efficiently penetrate VECs under hypoxic conditions, inhibiting the proliferation, migration, and lumen formation of HUVECs, thereby suppressing pathological RNV. Additionally, tFNAs not only inhibit pathological angiogenesis but also prevent retinal vaso-obliteration (VO) and promote the normalization of damaged vessels in ischemic retinas. These effects are mediated through the regulation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway, which inhibits EC growth and metabolism under hypoxic conditions.

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a prevalent microvascular complication, affecting approximately 22.27 % of individuals with diabetes worldwide[191]. In its early stages, DR presents with microaneurysms, intraretinal hemorrhages, and retinal edema, while advanced stages may lead to vitreous hemorrhage, visual field defects, and even blindness[170,192]. Moreover, DR remains a major cause of blindness among adults[170]. However, effective clinical strategies remain limited. Current therapeutic options include laser photocoagulation, anti-VEGF agents, and corticosteroids[193]. Nevertheless, laser photocoagulation can cause irreversible retinal damage, while anti-VEGF therapy may interfere with the physiological functions of VEGF, potentially leading to adverse effects[194,195]. DR is closely associated with oxidative stress and is characterized by excessive production of ROS[196,197]. Mitochondria serve as the primary cellular organelles responsible for ROS generation[197,198]. When damaged mitochondria fail to undergo efficient clearance, they not only impair cellular energy metabolism but also keep ROS production, further exacerbating oxidative stress[199]. Resveratrol (RSV), a natural polyphenolic phytalexin found in grapes, has attracted significant attention for its ability to regulate multiple pathways involved in mitochondrial protection[200,201]. Research has shown that RSV regulates PINK1/PARKIN-mediated mitophagy in renal cells, upregulates mitophagy, and simultaneously activates mitochondrial respiratory complexes in ECs[202,203]. However, its limited cellular uptake efficiency and lack of organelle selectivity result in poor bioavailability, restricting its clinical effectiveness and application. To address these limitations, Yao et al.[204] synthesized a trackable targeted nanosystem (PP-TRh-RSV) that not only exhibits excellent biocompatibility and bioavailability but also ensures sustained release and photochemical stability of RSV. In vitro, PP-TRh-RSV effectively escapes from endolysosomes, targets mitochondria, regulates redox homeostasis, and modulates mitophagy. Furthermore, it mitigates vascular leakage and pathological angiogenesis in DR models. In vivo, PP-TRh-RSV can be detected and monitored using clinical ophthalmic laser diagnostic instruments. Functionally, PP-TRh-RSV inhibits RNV and retinal degeneration by modulating the NF-κB/inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and NF-κB/VEGF pathways, thereby delaying DR progression. As a hallmark carrier of DNA nanotechnology, tFNAs have transitioned from proof-of-concept research to the forefront of precision medicine in ophthalmology, offering novel therapeutic strategies for addressing challenges in ophthalmic diseases treatment.

Infectious diseases

In contemporary biomedicine, the synergistic threats posed by antibiotic resistance and viral mutations are intricately linked to demographic transitions and evolving disease profiles, further exacerbating public health challenges. The accelerated aging of populations and the increasing prevalence of metabolic disorders (eg, diabetes mellitus and obesity) have significantly contributed to a rising incidence of chronic infection, while the emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens and the rapid diversification of viral genomes have introduced new therapeutic complexities[205]. Biofilms are structured bacterial communities that adhere to the ECM secreted by bacteria on both living and non-living surfaces[206]. Within this matrix, bacteria embed themselves for protection, forming highly organized and resilient microbial assemblies. Biofilms contain various biomacromolecules, such as extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) and nucleic acids. The EPS matrix not only enhances bacterial adhesion but also promotes microbial aggregation and accumulation on surfaces, leading to the formation of dense, highly adhesive biofilms[207]. Consequently, bacteria within biofilms exhibit antibiotic resistance levels 500 to 5,000 times higher than their antibiotic-sensitive cells, including strains typically susceptible to antibiotics[208,209].

Three primary factors contribute to the high levels of antibiotic resistance observed in biofilms. Firstly, due to competition for nutrients and space, bacteria proliferating within biofilms exhibit reduced metabolic activity, making them less susceptible to growth-targeting antibiotics[210]. Secondly, the protein and polysaccharide components of the EPS matrix hinder or delay antibiotic penetration, allowing mature cells embedded deep within the matrix more time to develop resistance[210,211]. Thirdly, antibiotic-resistant bacteria secrete resistance factors that induce the entire biofilm community to acquire resistance through passive mechanisms[212]. Furthermore, the threat posed by viruses should not be underestimated. Viruses are ubiquitous, highly diverse, and rapidly adaptable, frequently establishing close associations with their hosts[[213], [214], [215], [216]]. Mutations drive sequence-level variations in viral genomes, ranging from single-base changes to large-scale genomic rearrangements[217]. Through continuous adaptation to host immune responses and environmental pressures, viruses evolve new mutant strains, consequently enhancing their survival and transmission efficiency[218,219]. Viral variation is a complex and dynamic process that not only poses a significant threat to human health but also places increasing demands on public health systems.

Traditional drug delivery systems demonstrate significant limitations in overcoming challenges associated with bacterial resistance evolution and viral mutation dynamics. Current drug delivery platforms primarily rely on liposomes or gold nanoparticles, which often present high cytotoxicity, disrupting host cell homeostasis despite their significant effectiveness. Additionally, these nanoparticles have inherent limitations in biocompatibility and structural programmability[220,221]. tFNAs demonstrate distinct advantages as next-generation drug delivery systems. Recent studies validate that tFNAs not only exert dual anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects but also enhance mammalian cell proliferation and differentiation capacity[61,141,221]. Notably, the structural programmability of tFNAs enables their application as versatile carriers for targeted nucleic acid drug delivery[61,222,223]. Unlike conventional nanoparticles, tFNAs can penetrate live cells without the need for auxiliary molecules, demonstrating mechanical stability and resistance to nuclease degradation[39,122]. Furthermore, they are rapidly internalized by cells through clathrin-mediated endocytosis and, when functionalized with nuclear localization signals, can effectively escape from lysosomes[3,4].

Zhang et al.[224] constructed a TDN/Histatin-5 (His-5) complex, where TDNs enhanced the uptake efficiency and antifungal activity of His-5. The complex induces an increase in intracellular ROS generation. The extensive accumulation of ROS subsequently disrupts intracellular biomolecules and metabolic pathways, thereby inhibiting the growth of Candida albicans. Additionally, treatment with TDN/His-5 promotes potassium ion efflux, causing ion imbalance and disrupting intracellular and extracellular volume regulation. Ultimately, this disruption results in cell death and exhibits an antibacterial effect. Zhang et al.[225] successfully synthesized antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs)-laden tFNA (ASOs-tFNA), which efficiently penetrated Streptococcus mutans and targeted multiple extracellular polysaccharides (EPS)-related genes (gtfBCD, gbpB, ftf). Treatment with 750 nM, ASOs-tFNAs significantly downregulated these genes, reduced EPS synthesis, and disrupted biofilm architecture, yielding thinner, more porous structures without affecting bacterial morphology. This multi-targeted inhibition effectively suppressed early biofilm formation and virulence, demonstrating that tFNAs serve as precise and non-bactericidal carriers for genetic modulation (Fig. 5a).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

a Graphical illustration of tFNAs’ mechanism in delivering ASOs to suppress bacterial biofilm formation by targeting EPS synthesis-related genes. Reproduced form ref.[225] with permission from Springer Nature, copyright 2020. b Mechanistic illustration of tFNA-GL13K complexes against bacteria. Reproduced form ref.[226] with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2020.

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) represent a diverse group of cationic and short peptides that naturally occur in various organisms[[227], [228], [229]]. Unlike traditional antibiotics, which primarily target specific intracellular targets, AMPs interact with negatively charged microbial membranes through electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. This interaction leads to irreversible membrane disruption, ultimately resulting in cytoplasmic leakage[[230], [231], [232]]. Notably, AMPs exhibit strong activity against drug-resistant bacteria and show less acquired resistance in the host. However, their peptide-based nature renders them susceptible to protease degradation[[233], [234], [235]]. Liu et al.[226] combined tFNAs with the antimicrobial peptide GL13K and investigated the inhibitory effects of this complex on Escherichia coli and Porphyromonas gingivalis. The tFNA-based delivery system significantly enhanced the antibacterial efficacy of GL13K against E. coli by facilitating bacterial uptake and promoting membrane destabilization. Furthermore, tFNAs strengthened GL13K’s activity against Porphyromonas gingivalis by shielding the peptide from degradation in the protease-rich extracellular environment (Fig. 5b).

tFNAs can competitively bind to host cell receptors targeted by viral nucleic acids, thereby blocking viral infection. Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), a human gamma-herpesvirus, is implicated in several lymphoproliferative disorders and significantly contributes to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related morbidity and mortality[[236], [237], [238]]. Similar to other herpesviruses, KSHV establishes lifelong latency by evading host immune surveillance, making it currently impossible to eradicate the virus from infected individuals[[239], [240], [241], [242]]. Consequently, disrupting the latent phase of KSHV is a crucial step towards eliminating the virus from infected host cells[240]. One of the most distinctive aspects of the KSHV genome is the terminal repeat (TR) region, which is highly enriched in guanine residues. DNA or RNA sequences with high guanine content, such as eukaryotic telomeric DNA, are known to form secondary structures called G-quadruplexes[[243], [244], [245], [246]]. The formation of G-quadruplexes in nucleic acid sequences initiates with the binding of four guanine residues to form a G-quartet, where each guanine residue interacts with another through two hydrogen bonds. The presence of a central monovalent cation (Na+ or K+) enhances the stability of the G-quadruplex. The resulting G-quartets have a strong tendency to stack, leading to the formation of a highly stable G-quadruplex structure[[247], [248], [249]]. Compounds that stabilize G-quadruplexes (eg, PhenDC3 and TMPyP4), target the GC-rich TR region of KSHV, which harbors numerous potential G-quadruplex formation sites[250]. These compounds stabilize G-quadruplex structures, leading to bidirectional stalling of replication forks, which impedes viral DNA replication processes, reduces viral genome replication, and lowers the copy number of viral episomes. Treatment with PhenDC3 triggers a stress response in KSHV-infected cells, activating additional replication forks and dormant replication origins[250].

Human herpesvirus 6A/B (HHV-6A/B) are two distinct DNA viruses. HHV-6B is a ubiquitous virus that infects nearly 100 % of the population. It is the causative agent of exanthema subitum, also known as the sixth disease of childhood, which manifests as a febrile rash in infants, typically between 6 and 15 months of age[251,252]. Reactivation of HHV-6B in immunosuppressed individuals has been associated with adverse clinical complications, including life-threatening encephalitis or graft rejection in transplant recipients[253]. The diseases associated with HHV-6A infection are not clearly established. BRACO-19 is a small-molecule compound that specifically binds to and stabilizes G-quadruplex structures at telomeres[254,255]. BRACO-19 binds to and stabilizes G-quadruplexes present in the single-stranded regions of telomeres. Additionally, BRACO-19 inhibits telomerase activity and causes displacement of the telomerase complex[254,255]. By binding and stabilizing telomeric G-quadruplexes, BRACO-19 impairs the interaction between telomerase and telomeric DNA, thereby inhibiting telomerase activity and reducing telomere mobility. This loss of telomere fluidity prevents homologous recombination between the viral genome and host telomeres, ultimately suppressing HHV-6A chromosomal integration[256].

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is the causative agent of AIDS. HIV infection leads to the progressive collapse of the human immune system, rendering the body incapable of combating various diseases and resulting in high mortality rates. Although numerous biosensors have been developed for early HIV detection, existing methods have inherent limitations. Diao et al.[257] designed a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor that combines entropy-driven strand displacement reactions (ESDRs) with bilayer DNA tetrahedra for the highly sensitive detection of HIV-related DNA molecules. In this system, target DNA initiates the ESDR amplification process, forming a dsDNA complex with terminal toe regions, which subsequently hybridizes with surface-immobilized hairpin probes. This approach exploits exposed hybridization sites within the DNA tetrahedral composite structure, effectively amplifying the SPR signal and enabling highly sensitive detection of target DNA. This strategy offers notable advantages, including high stability and low cost, making it a promising platform for the early detection of HIV-related DNA[258].

In summary, achieving high-sensitivity virus detection with a broad detection range, rapid and accurate performance, simple operation, low cost, high specificity, and strong applicability represents a significant advancement in diagnostic technology. These breakthroughs provide a reliable foundation for the early diagnosis of major infectious diseases. In the future, the integration of nucleic acid aptamers with advanced detection technologies is expected to further drive the development of portable diagnostic devices, enhancing accessibility and efficiency in disease diagnosis.

Skin and soft tissue

In the current field of dermatological disease management and soft tissue repair, conventional therapeutic strategies primarily include pharmacotherapy, physiotherapy, and surgical intervention. However, these approaches universally face inherent limitations imposed by the skin barrier, particularly in the treatment of deep cutaneous lesions, chronic conditions, and soft tissue injuries, where therapeutic efficacy is often suboptimal[259,260]. Externally applied agents (eg, corticosteroid-based formulations) may provide temporary symptomatic relief in a short term. However, their prolonged application is associated with adverse effects, including cutaneous atrophy and localized immunosuppression[261]. While laser therapy and electrostimulation-based modalities can effectively induce dermal regeneration and mitigate inflammatory responses, their effectiveness is limited in addressing complex cutaneous defects or extensive lesions, with additional concerns regarding potential complications and extended treatment durations[262,263]. Although surgical interventions can address extensive skin damage, they are often accompanied by significant trauma, prolonged recovery periods, and a higher risk of postoperative complications[264]. Compared with these conventional approaches, tFNAs demonstrate remarkable therapeutic potential in penetrating the skin barrier, achieving precise targeting, and modulating immune responses[265,266]. Due to their nanoscale three-dimensional structures, tFNAs efficiently penetrate the stratum corneum (SC), allowing for targeted delivery of therapeutic agents or genetic molecules to the dermal layer or sites of soft tissue injury, thereby overcoming the limited drug penetration associated with traditional treatments[266,267]. In addition to their high-efficiency drug delivery capability, tFNAs facilitate skin and soft tissue repair by modulating cellular functions while simultaneously minimizing the adverse effects associated with conventional therapies and enhancing treatment efficiency[268]. Consequently, tFNAs offer superior precision, controllability, and multifunctionality in dermatological therapeutics and soft tissue repair. tFNAs not only enhance drug delivery efficiency to specific lesion areas but also accelerate wound healing and tissue regeneration through coordinated mechanisms, including immune response modulation, angiogenesis promotion, and cell proliferation stimulation[268,269]. These characteristics position tFNAs as a promising therapeutic strategy for wound healing, chronic dermatosis management, and soft tissue repair.

The stratum corneum of the skin is generally a barrier that significantly impedes drug penetration, particularly in deep lesions or injured areas. As a nanomaterial, tFNAs can overcome this barrier due to their nanoscale dimensions and surface charge properties[270,271]. The surface of tFNAs can be functionally modified, for example, by conjugation with specific peptides or antibodies, enabling precise targeting of receptors on the surface of skin cells, such as the hyaluronic acid receptor (CD44)[[272], [273], [274]]. This targeting capability enables tFNAs to deliver drugs or gene molecules directly to specific skin lesions, thereby enhancing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing systemic side effects[273,275]. Beyond conventional targeted therapy, recent studies suggest that tFNAs can further refine targeted delivery by leveraging the unique microenvironment of the skin, including keratinocytes and the hair follicle matrix[[276], [277], [278]]. If tFNAs can selectively bind to specific epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) subtypes in the skin, they would further enhance targeting efficiency and promote drug accumulation in localized areas, especially showing significant potential in skin cancer treatment[225,279,280]. Furthermore, the self-assembling nature of tFNAs enables them to simultaneously carry and release multiple drugs or growth factors, effectively addressing the challenges associated with combining multiple therapeutic approaches in conventional treatments. For example, a dual-delivery strategy integrating anti-inflammatory drugs and growth factors not only enables rapid inflammation relief but also promotes wound healing[281,282].

Studies have shown that tFNAs modulate dendritic cell function in the skin, not only promoting local immune responses but also enhancing immune tolerance, thereby mitigating immune rejection reactions[283]. Recent research has further elucidated the influence of tFNAs on dendritic cells, revealing their ability to regulate immune responses by targeting surface molecules such as CD80 and CD86[283,284]. Through this mechanism, tFNAs play a more precise role in skin immune repair, particularly in immunomodulatory therapies, by promoting immune tolerance and reducing chronic inflammation, ultimately contributing to more sustained skin repair outcomes[[285], [286], [287]]. Additionally, tFNAs enhance the anti-inflammatory response during skin repair by modulating the expression of cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-10[288,289]. Through this precise immunomodulation, tFNAs exhibit significant therapeutic efficacy in managing skin inflammation caused by trauma, burns, or chronic skin diseases such as psoriasis[288].

Building on their ability to promote angiogenesis, the unique structure of tFNAs can also directly inhibit excessive angiogenesis by delivering siRNA targeting the VEGF receptor, thereby exerting a dual effect in the treatment of skin tumors[190,290,291]. By precisely regulating angiogenesis, tFNAs not only promote wound healing but also effectively prevent aberrant vascular formation, demonstrating significant potential for treating diabetes-related skin ulcers and promoting skin repair following radiotherapy[292]. The role of tFNAs in promoting angiogenesis is a key mechanism underlying their soft tissue repair capabilities[269,292]. Angiogenesis serves as the foundation of soft tissue repair, and tFNAs promote EC migration and proliferation, thereby facilitating neovascularization by delivering angiogenic factors such as VEGF and bFGF (Fig. 6)[63,291,292]. The formation of new blood vessels not only improves blood supply to the damaged area but also ensures an adequate supply of oxygen and nutrients necessary for the repair process[293]. Furthermore, tFNAs contribute to ECM remodeling, reduce scar tissue formation, and further enhance soft tissue regeneration[294,295].

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Graphical abstract highlighting the antioxidative and angiogenesis-promoting functions of tFNAs in the context of diabetic wound healing. AGEs: advanced glycation end products. MDA: malondialdehyde. SOD: superoxide dismutase. LDH: lactic dehydrogenase. Reproduced form ref.[292] with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2020.

Skin cancer, particularly melanoma, has become one of the fastest-growing cancer types worldwide. According to global cancer statistics, the incidence of skin cancer has risen significantly in recent years, especially among Caucasian populations[296,297]. Skin cancer primarily comprises basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and melanoma, with melanoma being the most aggressive and associated with the highest mortality rate[298]. Although early screening and surgical intervention can effectively reduce mortality, the high recurrence rate and immune evasion mechanisms of skin cancer pose significant challenges to its treatment[[299], [300], [301]]. In recent years, the emergence of molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapy has offered new hope for skin cancer treatment. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors, have demonstrated significant efficacy in advanced melanoma, they can also cause severe side effects, limiting their clinical application[302]. Similarly, molecular targeted therapies may induce skin toxicity, including rash and pruritus[303,304]. Consequently, there is an urgent need for the development of novel and more precise therapeutic strategies. The therapeutic application of tFNAs in skin cancer is primarily attributed to their exceptional targeting capabilities. Skin cancer cells, especially melanoma cells, frequently overexpress specific surface receptors, providing a strong basis for tFNA-based targeted therapy. Studies have shown that melanoma cells overexpress EGFR and integrin alpha-v beta-3 (αvβ3), among other receptors, making them ideal targets for tFNA-mediated delivery[[305], [306], [307], [308]]. By conjugating the DNA tetrahedron with anti-EGFR antibodies or small molecule ligands, its affinity for melanoma cells can be significantly enhanced[305,309]. The nucleic acid tetrahedron enters tumor cells through receptor-mediated endocytosis, enabling the precise delivery of encapsulated anticancer drugs or siRNA to the target site[258,310,311].

The nucleic acid tetrahedron induces apoptosis in cancer cells by modulating key molecular pathways within tumor cells. Skin cancer cells frequently evade apoptosis due to mutations in the p53 gene, making the restoration of p53 function a crucial strategy in skin cancer treatment[312,313]. Studies have demonstrated that tFNAs can serve as efficient carriers for delivering specific anticancer molecules or genes, such as the p53 gene or microRNA (miRNA)[265,314,315]. These molecules suppress tumor growth and metastasis by modulating the tumor microenvironment. This innovative therapeutic approach not only mitigates the side effects associated with conventional chemotherapy but also enhances the specificity and targeting efficiency of treatment[316]. By regulating gene expression in tumor cells, tFNAs effectively control the onset and progression of skin cancer, demonstrating groundbreaking therapeutic potential[317,318]. Furthermore, through modulation of the tumor microenvironment, tFNAs inhibit immune evasion in tumor cells and regulate immune cell polarization, thereby enhancing anti-tumor immune responses[287,317,319]. Compared to conventional treatment methods, tFNAs offer superior specificity while minimizing damage to normal tissues by precisely delivering anticancer molecules[284,314].

tFNA, as a novel nanotherapeutic carrier, provides innovative therapeutic strategies for cutaneous oncology through a multi-mechanistic approach that includes precision-targeted delivery, controlled drug release, apoptosis induction, and tumor microenvironment modulation. In the cosmetics industry, tFNAs exhibit broad application potential, primarily in anti-aging, skin whitening, skin repair, and skin barrier restoration[29,268,320]. With aging, collagen and elastin fibers gradually degrade, resulting in skin sagging, wrinkle formation, and other related issues. As an innovative nanomaterial, tFNA facilitates precise drug delivery, effectively modulating the activity of skin fibroblasts, promoting collagen synthesis, and restoring skin firmness and elasticity[266,294]. Its role in the field of anti-aging extends beyond the delivery of genes that promote collagen synthesis, such as transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) and collagen type I alpha 1 (COL1A1). It also enhances anti-aging effects by modulating the expression of miRNAs[267,[321], [322], [323]]. For example, miR-29b, a key miRNA molecule, regulates collagen degradation, thereby preserving skin structure and elasticity[324,325]. By delivering these miRNAs or other regulatory factors, tFNAs enable more precise modulation of the skin aging process, achieving a more effective and long-lasting anti-aging effect[267,326]. Additionally, through surface modification, tFNA can bind to EGFR on skin cells, activating downstream signaling pathways such as MAPK and PI3K/Akt, thereby promoting skin cell repair and regeneration[276,[327], [328], [329], [330]]. This regulation not only enhances the skin’s self-repair ability but also accelerates skin cell proliferation by modulating the cell cycle, effectively alleviating the aging process[276,331,332].

tFNAs also demonstrate significant advantages in the field of skin whitening. By acting as carriers for small-molecule drugs that inhibit melanin synthesis (eg, hydroquinone and arbutin), tFNAs effectively reduce tyrosinase activity, thereby inhibiting melanin production and addressing issues like uneven skin tone[[333], [334], [335]]. Studies suggest that tFNAs enhance the targeting and permeability of whitening agents by binding to specific receptors on the surface of melanocytes, such as melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R), thereby achieving a more sustained whitening effect[288,[336], [337], [338]]. This mechanism not only enhances the efficacy of whitening agents but also strengthens the skin’s resistance to external stimuli, providing more effective protection. Environmental factors contribute significantly to skin barrier disruption, which is a primary cause of skin dryness, allergies, and various dermatological conditions[339,340]. By delivering repair factors, tFNAs accelerate skin barrier restoration and significantly improve the skin’s moisture retention ability[294,341,342]. Studies have shown that tFNAs improve skin barrier function and hydration by promoting the proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes, showing great potential in the treatment of dry skin[65,343,344]. Additionally, the antioxidant properties of tFNAs further contribute to skin barrier repair[344,345]. By delivering antioxidant molecules such as vitamin C and E, tFNAs scavenge free radicals and reduce oxidative damage, thereby delaying skin aging and preserving skin health and a youthful appearance[333,[346], [347], [348]]. These effects highlight the broader potential applications of tFNAs in skin repair and anti-aging.

Neurological and mental disorders

The global prevalence of neurological and psychiatric disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), major depressive disorder (MDD), and epilepsy, has been rising annually, imposing a significant burden on healthcare systems. The treatment of central nervous system (CNS) diseases remains challenging due to the presence of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and the complexity of their pathophysiological mechanisms. tFNA, owing to its unique geometric structure and nanoscale size, can effectively penetrate the BBB and precisely target the nervous system[349,350]. By adjusting the sequence and length of its building blocks, the physicochemical properties of tFNA can be optimized. Additionally, surface modifications can enhance its interactions with target cells, further improving its therapeutic potential for neurological disorders[314].

With the increasing incidence of neurological injuries, especially in neurodegenerative diseases, promoting nerve regeneration and repair has become a key focus of current research. The proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells (NSCs) are crucial for nervous system development and repair. During the early stages of nervous system development, NSCs continuously proliferate, providing a sufficient cellular source for neural network formation, and gradually differentiate into various types of neural cells, such as neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes, thereby establishing a complex and precisely regulated neural network[351]. After nervous system injury, the proliferative and differentiative abilities of NSCs remain critical. They can be activated, proliferate to generate new cells, and differentiate into the corresponding neural cell types to replenish damaged areas and facilitate neural function restoration[352]. tFNAs demonstrate a distinctive and potent mechanism in promoting the proliferation and differentiation of NSCs. Ma et al.[344] systematically investigated the regulatory effects of tFNAs on NSC proliferation and differentiation, as well as the underlying molecular mechanisms. To address the challenges associated with the proliferation and differentiation efficiency of NSC transplantation for the treatment of neurological disorders, this study employed mouse neuroectodermal (NE-4C) stem cells as a model. Through material synthesis and characterization, cellular uptake experiments, and functional analyses, the study demonstrated that tFNAs can be efficiently internalized by cells and significantly enhance the proliferation and neuronal differentiation of NE-4C stem cells at a concentration of 250 nM. Further mechanistic investigations revealed that tFNAs exert their effects through dual signaling pathways. Regarding proliferation, tFNAs activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by specifically binding to the Wnt receptor Frizzled family, enhancing signal transduction efficiency. This interaction promotes β-catenin nuclear accumulation, where it binds transcription factors such as Lef-1 and upregulates proliferation-related genes including cyclin D1 and c-myc, thereby accelerating NSC entry into the cell cycle and promoting continuous division and proliferation[[353], [354], [355], [356]]. With respect to differentiation regulation, tFNAs exert their effects by inhibiting the Notch signaling pathway, significantly downregulating the expression of the Notch-1 membrane protein and reducing the production of inhibitory transcription factors such as Hes-1 and Hes-5, thereby relieving the inhibition of neuronal differentiation genes, such as NeuroD and Ngn[344,357,358]. Additionally, when NSCs receive differentiation signals, tFNAs can inhibit the overactivation of the Notch signaling pathway, thereby promoting NSC differentiation into neurons[357,359]. Specifically, tFNAs bind to a specific domain of the Notch receptors, preventing their interactions with ligands, thereby inhibiting Notch signaling transmission. This suppression allows the normal expression of neuronal differentiation-related genes within the cell, guiding NSCs to gradually differentiate into mature, functionally active neurons[357,358,360]. Moreover, tFNAs can indirectly influence NSC proliferation and differentiation by modulating growth factors and ECM components within the cellular microenvironment. They promote the secretion of key growth factors involved in NSC proliferation and differentiation, such as BDNF and nerve growth factor[357,[361], [362], [363]]. Upon binding to their respective receptors on the NSC surface, these growth factors activate intracellular signaling pathways, further enhancing NSC proliferation and differentiation[363,364]. Concurrently, tFNAs can also modulate ECM composition and structure, creating a more favorable environment for NSC adhesion and migration. This optimization facilitates NSC migration to appropriate locations following proliferation, thereby improving their contribution to nervous system development and repair[109,258,268,365].

In the nervous system, apoptosis is a tightly regulated physiological process essential for maintaining both structural integrity and functional balance. When the nervous system experiences external injury or internal pathological changes, a cascade of intracellular signaling events is triggered, leading to the activation or suppression of apoptosis-related genes[366,367]. tFNAs can regulate apoptosis by interacting with specific apoptosis-related genes or proteins, thereby modulating the process of apoptosis[[366], [367], [368]]. For example, tFNAs can bind to the pro-apoptotic protein Bax, inducing conformational changes that prevent its insertion into the mitochondrial membrane. This inhibition reduces cytochrome c release, thereby suppressing the downstream caspase cascade and ultimately preventing neural cell apoptosis[367]. Conversely, in situations where the clearance of abnormal or aging neural cells is required, tFNAs can promote apoptosis by activating pro-apoptotic signaling pathways, thereby maintaining neural cell population health and homeostasis[366]. Neurotransmitters are essential for maintaining the normal function and balance of the nervous system and are critical for diverse brain activities. Cui et al.[369] found that the novel tFNA oral delivery system can inhibit the production of Parkinson’s disease-related gut pathogens and their metabolites, inhibit the activation of immune cells and the release of inflammatory cytokines, and promote the secretion of the neurotransmitter 5-HT by enteroendocrine cells. This process subsequently attenuates the apoptosis of dopaminergic neurons in the striatum. These findings highlight the potential of tFNAs in modulating neural signal transmission and maintaining the functional integrity of neural networks (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Schematic diagram of the mechanism by which tFNAs act on Parkinson’s disease (PD) via the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Acid-resistant exosome-like nanovesicles (Exo@tac) were prepared from ginger and were equipped with AMP-modified tFNAs. Microbiome analysis confirmed that Exo@tac normalized the gut microbiota composition in a PD mouse model and significantly improved PD symptoms upon oral administration in vivo. Reproduced form ref.[369] with permission from Elsevier, copyright 2024.

Neuroinflammation, as a core mechanism underlying various neurological and psychiatric disorders, has long been a central focus of scientific research. tFNAs play an important regulatory role in this process by effectively inhibiting neuroinflammatory responses through the modulation of multiple inflammatory pathways[366]. Among these, the NF-κB signaling pathway represents a central regulatory mechanism of inflammation and governs cellular responses to inflammatory stimuli[370]. tFNAs bind to IκB kinase (IKK), thereby inhibiting NF-κB activation and preventing the phosphorylation and degradation of IκB[288,366]. This process blocks the translocation of NF-κB from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, disrupting its ability to initiate the transcription of inflammation-related genes and thus mitigating the inflammatory response[370,371]. Additionally, tFNAs may modulate the MAPK signaling pathway by inhibiting the phosphorylation of MAPK family members, significantly reducing the expression and release of inflammatory cytokines[372]. This ingenious regulatory mechanism effectively slows the progression of neuroinflammation and protects neural cells from damage. During neuroinflammation, abnormal activation of immune cells frequently exacerbates neural damage. Specifically, tFNAs inhibit the excessive activation of microglial cells, thereby reducing the release of inflammatory mediators and ROS, which slows the progression of neural damage[350,373]. In addition, tFNAs also regulate macrophage polarization, promoting the shift from the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype to the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. This transition exerts anti-inflammatory effects and further facilitates neural tissue repair and regeneration[374]. Through this series of intricate regulatory mechanisms, tFNAs effectively alleviate the burden of neuroinflammation, protect the integrity of the nervous system, and demonstrate promising potential for the treatment of neuroinflammation-related diseases.

Neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by neuronal damage, functional impairment, and aberrant immune responses. Existing treatments often fail to effectively halt disease progression, particularly in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), which has emerged as an increasingly serious global health concern. The core pathological features of AD include the accumulation of β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques and the hyperphosphorylation of tau protein, both of which disrupt neuronal signaling and contribute to progressive neurodegeneration[375]. Current AD therapies primarily aim to relieve symptoms and delay disease progression, as no curative treatment is available. The main pharmacological agents include cholinesterase inhibitors (eg, donepezil) and N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor antagonists (eg, memantine). The former can improve cognitive function in patients with mild to moderate AD for approximately 6–12 months but is frequently associated with side effects such as nausea and diarrhea. The latter is more effective in patients with moderate to severe AD, and combination therapy shows greater efficacy; however, the long-term therapeutic effects tend to diminish over time[[376], [377], [378]]. In recent years, disease-modifying therapies targeting AD pathology (eg, Aβ monoclonal antibodies) have achieved some breakthroughs, but their clinical benefits remain limited and are associated with risks such as cerebral edema[379,380]. Shao et al.[367] found that tFNAs can partially cross the BBB, improve the learning and memory abilities of rats, restore the abnormal morphology and number of neurons in the hippocampus, reduce the deposition of Aβ1-40, and inhibit apoptosis in the hippocampus. Besides, tFNAs show no significant toxic side effects on neural cells at specific concentrations and hold promise as a new therapeutic approach for AD.

Similarly, epilepsy treatment faces the same challenges[381,382]. Increased adenosine kinase (ADK) activity leads to adenosine deficiency in the brain in epilepsy[381,383]. Zhu et al.[384] designed a tFNA-based nanoantiepileptic drug (tFNA-ADKASO@AS1) carrying an antisense oligonucleotide against ADK and an A1 astrocyte-targeting peptide (AS1). The construct efficiently crossed the BBB, selectively downregulated ADK in reactive A1 astrocytes, restored endogenous adenosine levels, suppressed aberrant mossy fiber sprouting and pathological circuit reorganization, and thereby reduced seizure frequency (Fig. 8a). Long-term treatment showed no significant neurotoxicity or organ damage, providing a new direction for the treatment of epilepsy and other central nervous system diseases.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

a Schematic diagram of the mechanism of the tFNA (tFNA-ADKASO@AS1) carrying ADKASO and AS1 in a chronic temporal lobe epilepsy mouse model. Reproduced form ref.[384] with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2023. b Schematic model of the underlying mechanism by which TDN-miR-22-3p exerts its antidepressant effects. Under physiological conditions, miR-22-3p suppresses the expression of phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN). This suppression enables PI3K to catalyze the conversion of PIP2 into PIP3. PIP3 then phosphorylates AKT, which subsequently inhibits the activation of nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain, leucine rich repeat and pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3). Conversely, during depression, the downregulation of miR-22-3p causes an upsurge in PTEN levels. The elevated PTEN impedes PIP3 production, reactivating pathways that were initially repressed. This reactivation ultimately exacerbates the inflammatory response, contributing to the pathophysiology of depression. Reproduced form ref.[391] with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2023.

The treatment of psychiatric disorders is challenged by the complex imbalance of neurotransmitters and impaired synaptic plasticity. Major depressive disorder (MDD), a prevalent and highly disabling condition, affects a substantial portion of the global population. Current treatment methods are limited by delayed onset of action and a lack of efficacy in a subset of patients. The discovery of miRNA has introduced promising therapeutic prospects for depression. Among them, miRNA-22-3p, a non-coding RNA consisting of 19–24 nucleotides, is closely associated with neuroplasticity and depressive symptomatology. It also exhibits notable anti-inflammatory effects, suggesting therapeutic potential in depression[[385], [386], [387], [388]]. However, the clinical application of miRNA-22-3p is constrained by its poor in vivo stability and limited ability to cross the BBB[389,390]. To these issues, Luo et al.[391] utilized the excellent structural stability, programmability, and biocompatibility of tFNAs as carriers for miRNA-22-3p, and successfully synthesized TDN-miR-22-3p. The study results showed that TDN-miR-22-3p can effectively cross the BBB and be taken up by target cells. Moreover, it regulated molecular expression levels, reduced the release of inflammatory factors, and alleviated LPS-induced cellular inflammation, thereby alleviating depressive symptoms (Fig. 8b). This study successfully established a new miRNA delivery platform and highlighted the potential of tFNAs in enhancing miRNA-22-3p delivery across biological barriers, offering a promising direction for depression treatment.

Hepatorenal disease

The liver is a vital organ responsible for numerous essential physiological functions, and various liver diseases can significantly compromise patient health. Acute liver injury (ALI) refers to the acute damage to the liver caused by external factors such as drug toxicity, viral infections, excessive alcohol consumption, or chemical exposure[[392], [393], [394]]. Clinical manifestations of ALI include jaundice, elevated liver function tests levels, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy. Without timely intervention, it may progress to acute liver failure (ALF), which can be life-threatening[395]. Traditional treatment approaches primarily aim to eliminate or mitigate the underlying cause of injury, yet they do not offer in-depth intervention that directly promotes hepatic repair and regeneration[396]. Upon hepatic injury, hepatocytes release large quantities of cytokines and inflammatory mediators, amplifying the local inflammatory response. This exacerbates hepatocellular damage and establishes a vicious cycle of inflammation and injury. The process is further intensified by oxidative stress responses, which trigger the excessive production of ROS and free radicals[397,398]. Excessive ROS can damage hepatocyte membranes, proteins, and DNA, leading to further cellular injury and hepatocyte necrosis[398]. Meanwhile, Kupffer cells and hepatic stellate cells contribute to the amplification of the inflammatory response. Cytokines released by these cells during the injury process not only exacerbate inflammation but also promote the progression of fibrosis[399]. In the treatment of ALI, tFNAs can be used as carriers for anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, or hepatoprotective agents, enabling targeted delivery to hepatic tissue. Targeted delivery not only minimizes drug distribution to non-target tissues, thereby reducing systemic side effects, but also ensures higher drug concentrations at sites of injury[400]. Hepatocyte proliferation and liver regeneration are crucial for the restoration of liver function following injury. As oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of ALI, tFNAs can activate multiple proliferative and pro-survival signaling pathways, creating a favorable microenvironment for hepatic recovery.

Chen et al.[401] investigated the effects of tFNAs on liver regeneration in the context of ALF. The researchers demonstrated that self-assembled tFNAs are rapidly taken up by hepatocytes and subsequently cleared via renal excretion. tFNAs promoted hepatocyte proliferation in vitro through activation of the Notch and Wnt/β-catenin pathways. Across multiple models of ALI, tFNAs alleviated hepatic damage and accelerated regeneration by driving cell cycle progression and engaging the P53 signaling pathway (Fig. 9a). Additionally, the liver possesses a certain degree of self-repair capacity following injury, particularly through the proliferative potential of hepatocytes under specific conditions[402,403]. Wei et al. developed miR-122-functionalized TDN (TDN-miR-122) to enhance stem cell-based therapy for ALF. In the first study, TDN-miR-122 effectively induced the hepatic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) into mature hepatocyte-like cells, and transplantation of these engineered cells markedly restored liver function in ALF mice by enhancing hepatocyte function, promoting proliferation, inhibiting apoptosis, and reducing inflammation (Fig. 9b)[404]. Building on this, a subsequent study demonstrated that TDN-miR-122 was also applied to adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs), where it drove their differentiation into hepatocyte-like cells and supported the formation of hepatic spheroids with ECs, thereby improving hepatocyte maturation and liver-specific functions[405].

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

a Schematic diagram of the mechanism of action of tFNA in a mouse model of liver injury. tFNA promotes liver cell proliferation by activating the Notch and Wnt signaling pathways, alleviating damage, and enhances liver regeneration by regulating the cell cycle and the P53 signaling pathway. Reproduced form ref.[401] with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2022. b Schematic illustration of ALF with TDN-miR122-hMSCs. The TDN loaded with miR122 can significantly enhance the transfection efficiency of miR122, thereby accelerating the differentiation of hepatocytes from hMSCs. The resulting TDN-miR122-hMSCs possess the functionality of mature hepatocytes, which enables them to effectively mitigate the damage caused by ALF. Significantly, TDN not only acts as a vector that induces the differentiation of hMSCs into hepatocytes but also participates in the combined treatment of ALF. Reproduced form ref.[404] with permission from KeAi Communications Co, copyright 2023.

Hepatic fibrosis (HF) and cirrhosis are irreversible pathological conditions resulting from prolonged chronic liver injury, characterized by architectural remodeling of the liver and progressive loss of hepatic function[406]. HF is typically caused by the liver’s repeated exposure to toxins, viral infections, alcohol abuse, metabolic disorders, and other risk factors, leading to excessive formation of fibrous connective tissue across various hepatic regions. This process may advance to cirrhosis and ultimately progress to liver failure[407,408]. Once cirrhosis develops, treatment options are generally limited to symptomatic supportive care or liver transplantation, due to the absence of effective anti-fibrotic therapies[409]. Current treatment strategies primarily aim to slow or halt the progression of HF. These include the administration of anti-fibrotic agents such as TGF-β inhibitors, antioxidants, and anti-inflammatory therapies. However, these approaches are often constrained by limited targeting capability and efficacy. Kim et al.[410] designed a cholesterol-conjugated DNA tetrahedron (Chol3-Td) that exploits serum lipoprotein interactions for targeted hepatic delivery. After systemic administration, Chol3-Td exhibited efficient liver accumulation and was preferentially taken up by hepatocytes via scavenger receptor class B type 1 (SR-B1) and low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) pathways. Utilizing this mechanism, Chol3-Td was loaded with an antisense oligonucleotide against transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-β1) (ASO@Chol3-Td), which effectively suppressed TGF-β1 expression, reduced collagen deposition, and improved liver function in fibrotic mice. Notably, ASO@Chol3-Td achieved gene silencing comparable to the clinically validated GalNAc3-ASO platform, underscoring its potential as a competitive and efficient strategy for liver-targeted therapy of HF.

Cirrhosis represents the advanced stage of HF and contributes significantly to the global disease burden. However, there are currently no approved pharmacological therapies available for clinical use[411,412]. Utilizing gene editing technology, tFNAs can transport miRNA or siRNA to silence fibrosis-associated genes, thereby slowing fibrosis progression, inhibiting further deterioration, and potentially improving hepatic function even after cirrhosis onset. Tian et al.[413] developed a tFNA-based siRNA delivery system (tFNA-siCcr2) to inhibit CCR2 expression for cirrhosis therapy. After intraperitoneal administration, the complex accumulated in the liver, preferentially targeting macrophages and liver sinusoidal ECs (LSECs), and showed higher silencing efficiency than conventional transfection agents. In the model of HF, tFNA-siCcr2 downregulated CCR2, reduced fibrotic progression, and reshaped the immune microenvironment by limiting pro-fibrotic macrophage and neutrophil infiltration. Mechanistically, it suppressed NF-κB signaling and decreased inflammatory mediators, thereby promoting an anti-fibrotic milieu.

Kidney diseases are also significant health issues faced in clinical practice, especially acute kidney injury (AKI). AKI is characterized by a rapid decline in renal function, typically triggered by external factors such as surgery, drug-induced nephrotoxicity, infections, hypotension, or physical trauma[[414], [415], [416]]. Clinically, AKI is manifested by decreased urine output, elevated serum creatinine levels, and electrolyte imbalances. In severe cases, it may progress to renal failure and subsequently lead to multiple organ failure, carrying a high mortality rate[417]. Although advances have been made in the clinical management of AKI, early diagnosis remains a significant challenge. Timely identification of AKI is crucial, as early intervention can dramatically improve patient outcomes and prevent irreversible kidney damage. Ding et al.[418] developed a kidney injury molecule-1 (Kim-1)-targeted tetrahedral DNA framework nanodevice (Kim-TDF) that integrates kidney targeting, biomarker recognition, and near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging. Kim-TDF enabled rapid and specific accumulation in injured kidneys and detected AKI much earlier than conventional serum or urine tests, offering a sensitive and minimally invasive diagnostic strategy.

Oxidative stress plays a central role in the pathogenesis of AKI. Renal injury caused by external insults is often accompanied by excessive production of ROS. These oxidative products not only directly attack renal tubular epithelial cells, cell membranes, and organelles but also activate multiple intracellular signaling pathways, resulting in increased apoptosis, necrosis, inflammation, and aggravated tubular injury[419]. The nanoscale size of tFNAs enables them to penetrate renal tubular epithelial cells and facilitates their accumulation within the kidney[420,421]. Through surface modification, tFNAs can be directed to specific renal regions, particularly those affected by oxidative damage. The generation of ROS can damage key cellular biomolecules, including lipids, proteins, and DNA, ultimately leading to cellular dysfunction and tissue injury. In this context, antioxidant supplementation has been shown to effectively scavenge ROS and alleviate oxidative stress[422]. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) is an important antioxidant enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of superoxide anion radicals into hydrogen peroxide, thereby reducing oxidative damage to cells[422,423]. However, the intrinsic instability of SOD in biological environments complicates its direct delivery to the site of injury[424]. Recognizing the current lack of effective treatments for AKI, Yan et al.[425] constructed a tFNA-based drug delivery system by loading Tylophorine (Typ) onto tFNAs (TTC). Typ, a saponin extracted from Tylophora, exhibits anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, and antioxidant activities[426]. TTC reduced apoptosis and oxidative stress, restored mitochondrial function, and preferentially accumulated in renal tubules to protect kidney function in AKI mice. This mitochondria-protective strategy offers a promising therapeutic approach for AKI and related renal injuries. Chen et al.[427] developed a tFNA-FG-4592 complex (TFG) that enhances the hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) signaling to protect against cisplatin-induced AKI. TFG showed efficient renal accumulation, reduced tubular apoptosis, and preserved kidney function, offering a biocompatible strategy to mitigate chemotherapy-associated nephrotoxicity (Fig. 10b). However, further studies are needed to investigate the efficacy of TFG against other nephrotoxic agents and to elucidate the precise mechanisms involving HIF-1α and apoptosis-related pathways. The recovery process from AKI is multifaceted, involving the mitigation of oxidative stress, suppression of inflammation, and promotion of renal cell repair and regeneration. The regenerative capacity of renal tubular epithelial cells is regulated by a variety of biological factors, including growth factors, transcription factors, and intracellular signaling pathways[428,429]. As gene delivery carriers, tFNAs can transport genes or RNA molecules associated with cellular repair and regeneration to renal tissues, thereby promoting kidney recovery[413,430]. Hien Bao Dieu Thai et al.[430] noted that while p53 siRNA shows therapeutic potential for AKI, its clinical translation is hindered by poor cytoplasmic uptake and low stability. To overcome these barriers, they designed small-sized DNA tetrahedrons (sTds) and identified L-sTd as an efficient kidney-targeted nanocarrier. In AKI mice, L-sTd delivered p53 siRNA to renal cells, suppressed p53 expression, and restored kidney function, highlighting its promise as a precision therapy for renal diseases. In summary, by enabling the targeted delivery of antioxidants, anti-inflammatory agents, and renal repair molecules, tFNAs can effectively alleviate oxidative stress and inflammation, thereby promoting renal regeneration and functional recovery.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

a Design and characterization of the Kim-TDF. The schematic illustration depicts fluorescence imaging of Kim-1, showcasing enhanced AKI-to-normal contrast achieved through the use of the Kim-TDF nanodevice. Reproduced form ref.[418] with permission from Wiley, copyright 2022. b The illustration emphasizes the synthesis of the TFG complex and elaborates on its significant anti-apoptotic function in HK-2 cells. By exerting this anti-apoptotic effect, it effectively protects the renal tissue against cisplatin-induced damage within the animal model. Reproduced form ref.[427] with permission from Wiley, copyright 2024. c sTds injected intravenously pass through the glomerular basement membrane and Bowman’s space via filtration. They then enter the tubules, and the nanoconstructs are selectively absorbed by the tubular cells. Reproduced form ref.[430] with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2020.

Cancer

Cancer precision therapy has long been hindered by the limitations of conventional chemotherapeutic agents, which exhibit low targeting specificity and substantial systemic toxicity. Functional modification of aptamers enables tFNAs to specifically recognize overexpressed target molecules on the surface of cancer cells, thereby achieving both targeted drug delivery and biosensing. Studies have demonstrated that this drug-loaded system delivers therapeutics with a 25-fold higher targeting efficiency compared to free aptamers. Moreover, it activates systemic anticancer immunity by inducing immunogenic cell death[431]. To date, this technology has demonstrated superior therapeutic efficacy over traditional treatments in preclinical models of breast cancer, glioblastoma, and lung cancer, and has advanced into the clinical translation phase.

Breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy among women[432]. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a subtype of breast cancer, poses a significant clinical challenge due to its aggressive nature and the absence of effective targeted therapies[433,434]. Adriamycin (Dox) is a widely used anticancer agent that mainly targets DNA and RNA synthesis[435]. However, its clinical efficacy is limited by poor cellular uptake and active efflux mediated by P-glycoprotein, resulting in insufficient intracellular accumulation in cancer cells[436]. Therefore, an efficient drug delivery system is essential to enhance the intracellular delivery of Dox to tumor cells. As drug delivery vehicles, tFNAs exhibit higher uptake in cancer cells compared to normal cells[437]. The specificity and efficacy of cancer treatment can be increased through employing targeted drug delivery systems and therapeutic agents with reduced off-target effects. A drug delivery platform was developed by loading the chemotherapeutic agent Dox onto tFNAs. At pH 5.0, the DNA tetrahedron: Dox complex (TD: Dox) at a 1:100 ratio released more drug over 24 h compared to free Dox[437]. This enhanced release may result from tFNAs entering cells via clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Once internalized, Dox intercalates into DNA and disrupts replication processes[438]. The TD: Dox system demonstrated improved cellular uptake in metastatic cells compared to free Dox and has been shown to inhibit cancer cell migration and invasion, highlighting its therapeutic value in combating metastasis[439].

Maytansine (DM1) is a microtubule inhibitor that binds to β-tubulin and restricts its movement[440]. Its anticancer potency is 100 to 1000 times greater than that of other anti-microtubule agents, such as paclitaxel (PTX)[441]. However, the non-specific toxicity and severe side effects associated with DM1 have prevented its clinical application[442,443]. DM1 was utilized in the development of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) because of its potent anticancer properties. The resulting conjugates demonstrated significant tumor inhibition while causing minimal harm to healthy cells[444]. Ma et al.[445] developed an anti-HER2 DNA-aptamer-modified DNA tetrahedron drug conjugate (HApt-tFNA) that precisely delivers DM1 to HER2-positive breast cancer cells (HApt-tFNA@DM1, HTD). To improve stability and therapeutic efficacy, they constructed a biomimetic nanocarrier by coating synthetic liposomes with red blood cell (RBC) membranes, which preserved natural RBC properties, prolonged circulation, and enhanced biosafety. The hybrid system also integrated pH-responsive release, ensuring selective drug delivery within the acidic tumor microenvironment (Fig. 11). When loaded with HTD, these erythrosome-based nanoparticles achieved efficient tumor targeting, strong antitumor activity, and reduced systemic toxicity compared with free drug and conventional liposomes, highlighting a promising strategy for HER2-positive breast cancer therapy.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Synthesis and antitumor mechanism of HTD encapsulated in PEOz-erythrosome hybrid nanocarriers. a Schematic representation of the stepwise synthesis protocol for HTD complex. b Construction of the PEOz-erythrosome@HTD hybrid delivery system via coextrusion methodology, combining PEOz-functionalized liposomes containing HTD with erythrosomes to form biomimetic nanocarriers with enhanced circulation stability and targeting capability. c Proposed mechanism of action: Following intravenous administration, PEOz-erythrosome@HTD selectively accumulates in the acidic tumor microenvironment due to its pH-responsive properties, triggering the controlled release of HTD. Subsequently, the released HTD complexes specifically bind to HER2 receptors on cancer cell surfaces, inducing receptor-mediated endocytosis. Within acidified endolysosomal compartments, the tFNA framework undergoes enzymatic degradation, liberating encapsulated DM1 molecules. The released DM1 binds with high affinity to β-tubulin, effectively disrupting microtubule dynamics by inhibiting both polymerization and depolymerization processes of α/β-tubulin, ultimately leading to mitotic arrest and apoptotic cell death in tumor cells. Reproduced form ref.[445] with permission from Wiley, copyright 2022.

Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common primary intracranial malignancy, arises from the neuroectoderm and has a median survival of only 15 months under the current standard of care[446]. Due to the highly aggressive growth of most GBMs, the boundary between tumor tissue and normal brain parenchyma is difficult to identify, making complete surgical resection challenging. Moreover, the cytogenetic heterogeneity of GBM hinders the efficacy of therapies targeting specific molecular pathways[447,448]. Despite recent advances in neurosurgical techniques, novel radiotherapy modalities, and the continuous development of clinical trials to optimize chemotherapy regimens, the prognosis of GBM remains poor. Temozolomide (TMZ) has served as the cornerstone of GBM treatment for decades[449]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that TMZ can induce apoptosis, autophagy, and senescence in glioma cells[[450], [451], [452]]. However, TMZ is associated with several major limitations. First, more than 50 % of GBM patients exhibit resistance to TMZ[453]. Second, prolonged or high-dose administration may lead to significant myelosuppression[446]. Third, virtually all patients eventually develop acquired resistance, resulting in tumor recurrence that is typically more aggressive than the primary glioma[454]. Extensive observations have suggested that TMZ resistance in glioma cells is primarily associated with the overexpression of O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT)[[455], [456], [457], [458], [459]]. In the present study, Fu et al.[460] successfully synthesized a TMZ-loaded tFNA (tFNA-TMZ) that enhanced cytotoxicity in TMZ-sensitive GBM cells by inducing apoptosis and autophagy, while overcoming resistance in TMZ-resistant cells via MGMT downregulation. To optimize delivery, tFNAs were simultaneously modified with GS24 and AS1411 aptamers, enabling BBB penetration, promoting nuclear localization, and further suppressing MGMT expression. In vivo, this dual-aptamer-modified tFNA exhibited stable cerebral vascular retention, highlighting its promise as a nanocarrier platform to improve TMZ delivery and therapeutic efficacy in GBM.

Accumulating data suggests that platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ), a marker of the basement membrane, strongly drives tumor progression and is closely associated with tumor cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis[461]. The Gint4.T aptamer, a high-affinity ligand and inhibitor of PDGFRβ, has been employed to deliver polymer nanoparticles, miRNAs, and CL4 aptamers to Uppsala 87 Malignant Glioma (U87MG) cells[[461], [462], [463]]. Gint4.T significantly inhibited proliferation and migration of U87MG cells and blocked tumor growth in vivo by its interaction with PDGFRβ. Based on the observation that ECs express PDGFRβ, Franchini et al.[462] suggested that Gint4.T may have the capacity to cross the BBB. PTX is an anticancer agent that stabilizes microtubule polymerization and disrupts mitotic processes and is widely used in the treatment of malignant gliomas[[464], [465], [466]]. However, its clinical application is limited by its high lipophilicity, cytotoxicity, and poor selectivity. Moreover, BBB prevents PTX from effectively penetrating brain tissue[467]. Shi et al.[372] synthesized a dual-aptamer-modified tFNA carrying GMT8 and Gint4.T (Gint4.T-tFNA-GMT8, GTG), which specifically target U87MG glioma cells and PDGFRβ-expressing ECs. GTG efficiently crossed an in vitro BBB model and, when loaded with PTX (GPC), markedly inhibited glioma cell proliferation, migration, and invasion while inducing apoptosis (Fig. 12a). This strategy demonstrates the promise of aptamer-modified tFNAs as targeted nanocarriers for glioma therapy.

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

a The preparation of GPC and its mechanism for inducing apoptosis in U87MG cells involve GPC targeting these cells by crossing the BBB. Reproduced form ref.[372] with permission from Elsevier, copyright 2019. b Precision-targeted gene therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a novel tFNA-based delivery system incorporating CEBPA-saRNA and hTfR aptamer. Reproduced form ref.[316] with permission from BioMed Central, copyright 2024.

Pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is among the most lethal malignancies worldwide, with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) accounting for approximately 85 % of all cases[468]. CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α (CEBPα), a member of the leucine zipper transcription factor family, is prominently expressed under normal physiological conditions and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations or downregulation of the CEBPα gene have been identified as key contributors to tumor initiation and progression in various cancer types[[469], [470], [471]]. Moreover, elevated expression of CEBPα has been shown to inhibit tumor progression and reduce the metastatic potential of PDAC[472,473]. RNA activation (RNAa) is an epigenetic regulatory mechanism in which gene expression is upregulated by a novel class of small RNAs known as saRNAs. These saRNAs can be engineered with tail tags to specifically target promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes, thereby inducing their transcriptional activation[[474], [475], [476], [477]]. Thus, the process inhibits cancer cell proliferation, invasion, and migration. Notably, saRNAs designed to target CEBPα have previously been shown to enhance CEBPα expression along with its downstream effector, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1 (P21), thereby inducing anti-tumor responses and reducing burden in a mouse PDAC model[473,478]. Wang et al.[316] designed a tFNA-based gene therapy agent, termed aptFNAsa, which utilizes CEBPα-saRNA as the gene effector and a human transferrin receptor (hTfR) aptamer as the targeting ligand for PDAC treatment. This engineered construct demonstrated excellent structural stability, efficient cellular uptake, and intracellular release of saRNA assisted by endogenous RNase H. Consequently, it significantly activated the tumor suppressor gene CEBPα and its downstream effector P21, resulting in marked inhibition of PDAC cell proliferation in vitro and substantial suppression of tumor growth in PDAC mouse models (Fig. 12b).

Lung cancer

Lung cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies and remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Several immunotherapeutic agents have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as first-line treatments for lung cancer, especially for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC)[479]. However, traditional delivery methods for immunosuppressive agents, such as intravenous or intraperitoneal administration, often fail to achieve sufficient tumor-specific accumulation and may result in off-target exposure, thereby reducing therapeutic efficacy and increasing the risk of adverse effects. Additionally, the presence of immunoglobulin G (IgG) in alveolar macrophages and pulmonary mucus can recognize and clear inhaled exogenous agents, further limiting their bioavailability[480,481]. Cytosine-phosphate-guanosine (CpG)-loaded TDNs (C@TDN) need to be internalized by immune cells to activate antigen-presenting cells via the Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) pathway, significantly promoting bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) maturation and inducing macrophage phagocytosis and M1 polarization more effectively than free CpG or TDN alone[[482], [483], [484]]. Building on this, Fan et al. [284] designed an inhalable nanoplatform (CP@TDN) co-delivering CpG and a PD-L1 aptamer, which not only activates innate immune responses but also blocks the PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint to enhance T cell activity. CP@TDN activated pro-inflammatory immune responses, enhanced intratumoral accumulation, and in a lung melanoma metastasis model, markedly inhibited tumor growth and prolonged survival, demonstrating strong anti-tumor immunity (Fig. 13).

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

A diagram presents the design of an immunomodulatory transmucosal delivery system based on tFNA. This system is intended for the treatment of metastatic lung cancer and functions by triggering a potent antitumor immune response. Reproduced form ref.[284] with permission from Elsevier, copyright 2023.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 80 % of all types of lung cancer and is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide[485]. PTX has significant efficacy against cancers such as lung, ovarian, and breast cancer[486]. Despite the clinical efficacy of PTX, its multidrug resistance limits its drug application[487]. Xie et al.[48] successfully synthesized TDNs and loaded PTX into these TDNs to construct a PTX/TDN drug delivery system. PTX/TDNs can significantly inhibit the proliferation of both multidrug resistant cells and wild-type cells due to the efficient internalization of PTX by the drug system. PTX/TDNs overcame resistance by downregulating mdr1 and P-gp expression, bypassing efflux pumps via endocytosis/exocytosis pathways, and enabling intracellular PTX accumulation. This led to microtubule bundle formation, mitotic arrest, and apoptosis, confirmed by altered caspase-3, Bax, and Bcl-2 expression. These findings highlight PTX/TDNs as a promising strategy to reverse multidrug resistance and enhance chemotherapy efficacy.

Comparative analysis of tFNA/TDN variants across disease contexts

To provide a more integrated understanding beyond individual studies, we compared the different tFNAs/TDNs reported across various disease fields (Table 1 and Table 2). Despite structural diversity, several common mechanisms emerge. First, almost all tFNA variants exhibit efficient cellular uptake, predominantly via caveolin- or clathrin-dependent endocytosis, often followed by endosomal trafficking, with nuclear localization signal (NLS) modification further enhancing nuclear delivery [4,61,63,154,204,224,226]. Second, many studies confirm an intrinsic anti-inflammatory and antioxidative effect of tFNAs, independent of payloads, primarily through modulation of NF-κB and MAPK pathways[143,186,372]. Third, tFNAs act as versatile protective and delivery platforms, improving the stability and intracellular availability of nucleic acid drugs (eg, RNAs and ASOs) and bioactive molecules (eg, flavonoids and antimicrobial peptides)[154,187,225,226,256,372]. Fourth, convergent signaling pathways including Wnt/β-catenin, PI3K/AKT, ERK, and Notch are repeatedly engaged across diverse applications[63,65,68,154,401].

Table 1.

Representative examples of tFNAs for disease therapy.

Name Structural Composition Molecular Target Function Description Disease Treatment Effect/Application Ref.
PTX/TDNs TDNs loaded with PTX mdr1 gene/P-gp protein Enables efficient intracellular PTX delivery, inhibits drug efflux pumps, downregulates mdr1/P-gp, and induces microtubule aggregation and apoptosis Overcomes multidrug resistance in NSCLC and other tumors, improving antitumor efficacy [48]
stFNA-miR loaded with miR–2861 HDAC5 protein Inhibits the expression of HDAC5 protein and enhances osteogenic differentiation Treatment of bone defects and osteoporosis [62]
TDN-miR-2-5p loaded with miR-21-5p AKT and ERK signaling pathways Activates the AKT and ERK pathways and enhances the osteogenic differentiation ability of aged BMSCs Treatment of bone defects and delay of cell senescence [63]
MiR@TDNs loaded with miR335-5p DKK1 gene/Wnt pathway Inhibits DKK1 expression, activates the Wnt pathway, and promotes bone formation and angiogenesis Treatment of SAON of the femoral head [68]
TDN-CLI bound to clindamycin Bacterial cell membrane Enhances antibacterial ability and promotes osteogenic differentiation Treatment of infected bone defects [92]
PPS-tFNA bound to pentosan polysulfate Articular chondrocytes Targeted delivery of PPS, inhibits cartilage proliferation, and promotes cartilage regeneration Treatment of osteoarthritis and cartilage damage [121]
DJ-1-saRNA-tFNA bound to DJ-1-saRNA DJ-1 protein Increases DJ-1 expression and reduces oxidative stress Treatment of diabetic retinopathy and macular degeneration [154]
tFNA-miR-2 loaded with miR-22 TrkB-BDNFpathway Activates the TrkB-BDNF and ERK pathways to protect retinal neurons Treatment of retinal ischemia–reperfusion injury and glaucoma [161]
tFNA-QUE bound to quercetin AKT/Nrf2/HO-1 pathway Inhibits pathological angiogenesis and improves retinal function Treatment of ischemic retinopathy [187]
TDN/His-His5 bound to the antimicrobial peptide His-His 5 Base sequence Enhance antifungal activity, promote ROS production and cell destruction Treatment of fungal infections [224]
ASOs-tFNA bound to ASOs Biofilm-related genes Inhibits the formation of pathogenic biofilms Treatment of bacterial infections and biofilm-related diseases [225]
GL13K-tFNA bound to the antimicrobial peptide GL13K Bacterial cell membrane Enhances the stability and activity of the antimicrobial peptide and inhibits bacterial infections Treatment of Gram-negative and periodontal pathogen infections [226]
Double-Layer DNA ESDR with a double-layer DNA tetrahedron structure HIV-related DNA target sequence The target DNA initiates the ESDR reaction to form a dsDNA complex, which then hybridizes with surface-immobilized hairpin probes. The exposed hybridization sites in the DNA tetrahedron An early detection platform for HIV-related DNA, with advantages of high stability and low cost [257]
aptFNAsa tFNA loaded with CEBPα-saRNA, conjugated with hTfR aptamer CEBPα tumor suppressor/P21 pathway Targeted delivery via hTfR aptamer, RNase H-mediated saRNA release, activates CEBPα expression, and inhibits PDAC cell proliferation Inhibits PDAC tumor growth and progression in mouse models by restoring tumor suppressor gene function. [316]
tFNA-ADKASO-AS1 Bound to ADKASO and linked to an A1-type ADK Crosses the BBB, targets A1-type astrocytes, inhibits ADK expression, increases adenosine levels in the brain, improves neural circuits, and reduces the frequency of epileptic seizures Treatment of epilepsy and potential central nervous system diseases, with good targeting and biosafety [384]
TDN-miR-22-3p loaded with miR-22-3p Inflammatory pathway factor Cross the BBB, take up by target cells, regulate molecular expression, inhibit the release of inflammatory factors, reduce inflammatory response, and relieve depressive symptoms Alleviate LPS-induced neuroinflammation and depressive symptoms, a novel miRNA delivery platform was constructed [391]
FNA-miR-122 Functionalized miR-122 Gene associated with hepatocyte differentiation Induce ADMSCs differentiation to hepatocyte like cells, construct functional liver-like spheres, improve liver function, and relieve liver injury and inflammation Treatment of ALF, promote liver regeneration, reduce inflammation and apoptosis, improve stem cell engineering efficiency [405]
ASO@Chol3-Td Chol3-Td binding to TGF-β1 mRNA ASO SR-B1 and LDLR Interact with serum lipoprotein, preferentially taken up by hepatocytes, targeted deposited in liver, effectively downregulating TGF-β1 expression, alleviating liver fibrosis, and reducing serum AST and ALT levels Treat liver fibrosis, reduce liver collagen deposition and liver enzyme levels, which could be comparable to GalNAc3-ASO [410]
tFNA-siCcr2 loaded with CCR2 CCR2 gene Targeting macrophages and hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells, effectively inhibited CCR2 expression, reshaped the liver immune microenvironment, and inhibited the aggregation of pro-fibrotic cells Improve liver fibrosis, significantly reduced the expression of inflammatory factors and extended the retention time of drugs in the liver during preventive and therapeutic intervention [413]
Kim-TDF bound to kidney TDF Kim-1 Targeting Kim-1 to detect early AKI, with good photo stability and renal clearance efficiency, NIR imaging and urine analysis can improve the sensitivity of early diagnosis Early diagnosis of AKI and enables significant differentiation between diseased and healthy tissues [418]
tFNA-Typ bound to the Chinese medicine component Typ Mitochondrial related Targeting renal tubules, inhibiting ROS generation, protecting mitochondrial function, and reducing ischemia–reperfusion induced apoptosis Alleviate AKI related renal injury, improve renal function, and provide a new strategy for the treatment of mitochondrial-related diseases [425]
TFG combined with HIF-1α stabilizer FG-4592 HIF-1α regulatory pathway Improve the uptake efficiency of HK-2 cells, relieve cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity and apoptosis, reduce renal tubular damage, and promote renal function recovery As a drug delivery platform for the treatment of kidney diseases, cisplatin-induced AKI therapy provides a protective strategy for chemotherapy-related nephrotoxicity [427]
sTd-p53 siRNA bound to p53 siRNA p53 mRNA Low immunogenicity, optimized nanosize, promote specific endocytosis, target kidney effective delivery of siRNA, inhibit p53 expression, improve renal injury Promise renal targeted siRNA delivery platform for the treatment of AKI and the promotion of renal function recovery [430]
HApDC Anti-HER2 aptamer-DM1 conjugate HER2 protein Targets HER2-positive tumor cells, releases drug in acidic tumor microenvironment and prolongs circulation time for enhanced tumor accumulation Treats HER2-positive breast cancer with high efficacy and safety, outperforming free drugs and traditional liposomes [445]
tFNA-TMZ tFNA loaded with TMZ, functionalized with GS24 aptamer BBB penetration/MGMT pathway Enhances TMZ delivery across BBB, induces apoptosis/autophagy in glioblastoma cells, and downregulates MGMT to overcome drug resistance Treats TMZ-sensitive and resistant GBM by improving drug brain penetration and antitumor efficacy [460]

Table 2.

Comparative analysis of tFNA variants.

Type Structure/Modification and Loading Uptake/Targeting Mechanism Mechanism of Action Applications Advantages Limitations Ref.
Standard tFNA Four ssDNA strands self-assemble into structures with tunable edge lengths Endocytosis; partial nuclear import facilitated by NLS Antioxidant effects, modulation of Wnt/Notch/MAPK/NF-κB signaling pathways,
promotion of cell proliferation and differentiation
Tissue repair, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotection Good biocompatibility, multifunctional Poor in vivo stability and limited loading capacity [4,35,61]
miRNA/siRNA@tFNA (eg, miR-2861 and siCcr2) miRNA/siRNA modifications at vertices/edges Endocytosis Regulating genes and pathways Bone regeneration, skin anti-aging, fibrosis disease Easy preparation, good biocompatibility, improved hybridization efficiency Poor mechanical properties, RNA exposure is prone to off-targeting, and the bioswitchable delivery system (BDS) is costly [68,314,405,413]
stFNA Designed for triggered release Endonuclease
−triggered
Targeted release, regulating related genes or pathways Bone regeneration Precise genetic regulation Environment-dependent trigger (needs in vivo validation) [62]
Drug-loaded (eg, QUE, DOX and Baicalin) Small molecule/
Chemotherapy drug coordination or embedding
Increase cell uptake and local concentration Drug effect and tFNA synergy Cancer, inflammatory disease and ischemic retinopathy Improving pharmacokinetics, high biocompatibility, strong targeting and high stability Release from serum/environmental effects and differential drug release [187,272,374,509]
AMP complex (eg, GL13K and His-5) AMP-tFNA conjugate Enhance cell/bacterial membrane action Enhance ROS induction and membrane damage Antibacterial, potentially used to inhibit microorganisms and related infections Improve AMP stability The safety of the host cell has not been verified and further studies are needed [224,226]
Lipid-modified type (eg, Chol3-Td) Cholesterol modification SR-B1 and LDLR Promotes hepatic uptake HF and ALF Natural liver targeting The accumulation varies across different tissues. [410]
ASO@tFNA Loaded with and functionalized by antisense oligonucleotides Enhancement of ASO uptake efficiency Genetic silencing inhibits disease pathways HF, epilepsy and Candida albicans Multiple targets Toxicity and off-target effects were not evaluated [224,384,410]
Aptamer modifications (eg, GS24 and AS1411) Add aptamers to the surface of tFNA Receptor-mediated binding Improved tissue/cell specificity BBB penetration and targeted drug delivery Targeting specificity and reduced off-target side effects Restriction of receptor heterogeneity [460]
Spherical nucleic acids (SNA) (eg, tDF-SNAs) A SNA architecture constructed on tFNA surface to load siRNA The SNA shell promotes efficient cellular uptake; the tFNA structure optimizes the spatial interface Enhanced siRNA effect siRNA gene silencing therapy High loading capacity Complex construction steps [290]

Beyond these shared features, each variant demonstrates disease- or context-specific mechanisms. For instance, bioswitchable stFNA-miR enable microenvironment-triggered release of miR-2861 to enhance osteogenic differentiation via HDAC5/Runx2 signaling, highlighting their value in bone regeneration[62]. Chol3-Td exploits lipoprotein transport pathways for intrinsic liver targeting, making them promising for HF therapy[410]. Ligand-functionalized TDNs achieve tumor-specific or BBB-penetrating delivery, thereby expanding therapeutic windows in oncology and neurology[272]. The AMP-loaded complex GL13K-tFNA enhances antibacterial efficacy by improving peptide stability and promoting bacterial membrane disruption with subsequent cytoplasmic leakage, thereby exhibiting stronger bactericidal activity against pathogens[226]. Collectively, this comparative analysis illustrates that while tFNAs possess universality as protective, biocompatible carriers with inherent bioactivity, their performance and limitations are closely tied to structural modifications and disease context.

Conclusion and perspective

This review provides a comprehensive overview of tFNA self-assembly principles, structural optimization approaches, and multifunctional modification strategies. It also summarizes recent research advances across diverse medical domains, such as cancer therapy, bone and cartilage tissue engineering, treatment of infectious and neurological disorders, liver and kidney repair, and skin and soft tissue regeneration. Special attention is placed on the unique advantages and promising potential of tFNAs in targeted drug delivery and therapeutic applications. Nevertheless, despite these advances, multiple challenges remain before tFNA-based systems can be successfully translated into clinical practice.

Limited long-term structural stability

A persistent obstacle is the limited stability of tFNAs in vivo. While their tetrahedral structure confers improved mechanical strength and partial nuclease resistance compared to linear DNA, they remain vulnerable to sustained enzymatic degradation in complex physiological environments[52,269]. This compromises their drug delivery and therapeutic reliability. Recent studies suggest that backbone modifications such as phosphorothioation, together with PEGylation, can enhance nuclease resistance and prolong circulation time[[488], [489], [490]]. However, the long-term biocompatibility and safety of such chemical modifications require systematic preclinical validation.

Limited drug loading capacity

The intrinsic spatial constraints of tFNAs limit their drug loading efficiency and controlled release capability. Excessive surface modification may also hinder target interactions and impair bioactivity. Clinically, high drug-to-carrier ratios are essential to minimize off-target effects and systemic burden[491]. Simpler structures with fewer modifications may be more suitable for clinical translation, as they reduce complexity, costs, and nonspecific interactions. Innovative approaches, such as exploiting like-charge attraction to enhance membrane penetration may inspire new strategies for improving drug loading while maintaining delivery precision[492].

Biocompatibility, biosafety and ethical concerns

Although tFNAs demonstrate excellent cell permeability and therapeutic potential, their long-term toxicity and immunogenicity remain poorly characterized. Data on cumulative toxicity, repeated dosing, and organ-specific accumulation are limited, underscoring the need for rigorous safety assessments before clinical application. Additionally, ethical issues warrant careful consideration. The environmental risks of large-scale production and disposal of DNA nanomaterials should be monitored. High costs may also restrict access to tFNA-based personalized therapies, raising concerns about fairness and equity. Transparent informed consent and robust regulatory oversight are therefore essential to ensure that the development of tFNA-based therapies is both safe and socially responsible.

Limited adaptability to dynamic microenvironments

Current tFNA-based drug delivery strategies predominantly rely on static physical or chemical modifications. However, pathological microenvironments are dynamic, with variable pH values and enzyme activities that may impair efficacy. Designing stimuli-responsive systems capable of environment-adaptive release (eg, pH- or enzyme-triggered) represents a promising direction to improve therapeutic precision and expand clinical applicability[[493], [494], [495]].

Challenges in multifunctional theranostic platforms

tFNAs offer unique opportunities for integrated diagnosis and therapy. Their combination with CRISPR-Cas gene editing, photothermal or photodynamic agents, and other modalities could enable multifunctional theranostic platforms with high precision. Yet, significant barriers remain, including the modular assembly of multiple components, temporal control of release, and synergistic coordination among modalities[336,496]. Future studies should aim to elucidate the interaction mechanisms among different functional modules and clarify the synergistic effects between various therapeutic modalities. This necessitates the development of more robust modular design principles and optimization strategies to ensure that tFNA-based multifunctional theranostic platforms function with greater efficiency, precision, and safety under actual clinical conditions, thereby accelerating their translation from laboratory research to clinical application.

Barriers to large-scale production

Large-scale clinical application of tFNAs is hampered by the high cost and quality control issues associated with conventional enzymatic amplification and purification methods[190]. Recent advances in microfluidic chip technology enable rapid, reproducible, and scalable tFNA synthesis, while enzyme-free amplification strategies offer cost-effective alternatives[497,498]. Future research and development should prioritize the further integration and optimization of microfluidic chip technologies and enzyme-free amplification methods to establish a standardized, economically viable, and quality-consistent production framework. These advancements are expected to improve the controllability and scalability of large-scale tFNA manufacturing. The successful implementation of such advanced fabrication strategies will be essential for enabling industrial-scale production, accelerating clinical translation, and ultimately extending the therapeutic benefits of tFNA-based platforms to a broader patient population.

Opportunities in interdisciplinary integration

The profound interdisciplinary integration and innovative application of related technologies are also expected to open broader avenues for the future development of tFNA-based systems. Emerging fields such as synthetic biology and artificial intelligence are opening new avenues for advancing tFNA structural design and functional optimization. For example, unnatural nucleic acid backbones (eg, phosphorothioate-modified tFNAs) enhance nuclease resistance and stability, while AI-based modeling can predict folding pathways and optimize drug-loading strategies[499,500]. However, the safety and long-term biosafety of such innovations require thorough evaluation.

Methodological limitations

Although the above findings demonstrate the versatility of tFNAs across disease models, several methodological limitations warrant attention. First, differences between in vitro and in vivo outcomes remain underexplored. While many in vitro studies show efficient uptake and robust pathway activation, in vivo efficacy can be compromised by serum protein adsorption, nuclease degradation, and immune clearance[501]. Besides, the applicability of animal models is limited, as metabolic and immunological differences, which may reduce translational relevance from rodents to humans[502,503]. More importantly, lack of standardization in tetrahedron size, edge length, assembly methods, and functionalization hampers reproducibility and inter-study comparisons. Finally, quantitative evaluation of drug loading and pharmacokinetics is insufficient[504].

To address these issues, future work should incorporate comprehensive pharmacokinetics, toxicology, and human-relevant models such as organoids or non-human primates to bridge preclinical and clinical research. Regulatory policies, manufacturing costs, and quality control frameworks should also be addressed, drawing lessons from other nanomedicines that have advanced into clinical use.

Clinical Translation: Experiences and Lessons Learned

To date, several therapeutic nanomedicine products have received regulatory approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA)[502,503]. The clinical authorization of these nanomedicines has been primarily attributed to their superior therapeutic efficacy and improved safety profiles compared with conventional treatment modalities[505]. Representative success stories include the anticancer formulations Doxil®/Caelyx® and Abraxane®, which are widely regarded as landmark cases in the field[502,506]. Unlike traditional chemotherapeutics that exert non-selective cytotoxicity toward both malignant and healthy cells, these nanomedicine platforms achieve targeted delivery to tumor tissues and a significantly higher dose, a feature that has been central to their clinical and commercial success[505]. PEGylation has played a pivotal role in the clinical success of nanomedicines by markedly prolonging systemic circulation and mitigating immune clearance[507]. This type of modification forms the basis of many approved nanomedicines[508]. Such examples underscore the potential of nanomedicine to deliver significant clinical benefit beyond standard therapies. However, despite these achievements, the majority of nanomedicine candidates have failed to meet therapeutic expectations in clinical trials, and consequently, few have successfully advanced to commercialization.

The development of nanomedicines requires sustained efforts in clinical translation and commercialization. However, the majority of nanomedicine candidates have failed to demonstrate superior therapeutic efficacy and improved safety, often exhibiting limited targeting capability, which hinders their successful clinical translation and market entry[506]. In many cases, formulations that achieved remarkable efficacy in animal models failed to replicate these outcomes in clinical trials. The principal factors underlying such translational failures include difficulties in establishing robust and cost effective large scale manufacturing, the absence of comprehensive regulatory guidelines, insufficient characterization methodologies, safety concerns, inadequate stability in complex biological environments, and a limited understanding of patient-specific disease heterogeneity[[501], [502], [503], [504], [506]]. Consequently, a thorough understanding of the multidimensional attributes of approved nanomedicines, including their fundamental principles, physicochemical characterization, clinical performance, and regulatory requirements, is critical for precisely guiding the research and development process and enhancing the likelihood of successful translation.

Future directions: precision and personalized medicine

Looking ahead, tFNAs hold great promise for advancing precision and personalized medicine. Their integration with high-sensitivity sensing and therapeutic technologies could yield multifunctional platforms for both diagnosis and treatment. Personalized tFNA formulations tailored to individual patient profiles may enhance therapeutic precision and efficacy. Furthermore, synergy with existing modalities such as immunotherapy and gene editing could broaden their therapeutic impact. Continued efforts should focus on optimizing fabrication, drug loading, safety, and cost-effectiveness, while ensuring equitable access. With sustained interdisciplinary collaboration and responsible innovation, tFNAs are poised to become an important tool in clinical medicine, contributing meaningfully to human health worldwide.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Zhenhong He: Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Yi Liu: Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Yihuang Chen: Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Yuanqun Zhang: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. Yuyao Zhang: Investigation. Zhihong Chen: Investigation. Dingsu Bao: Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. Weihu Yang: Conceptualization, Supervision, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. Huan Liu: Conceptualization, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

This work was supported by Key research and development projects of Sichuan Science and Technology Plan Project (2024YFFK0135), Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2024 J011450) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2023 M732927).

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Biographies

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Zhenhong He is a master’s student of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, China. He is mainly working with his supervisor on tendon-bone healing and sports medicine. hzhhzhhzh7@163.com

graphic file with name fx2.jpg

Yi Liu is an undergraduate student majoring in clinical medicine in Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000,Sichuan, China. 18981636587@163.com

graphic file with name fx3.jpg

Yihuang Chen is an undergraduate student majoring in clinical medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences,Putian 351100, Fujian,China. 18876343873@163.com

graphic file with name fx4.jpg

Yuanqun Zhang is an undergraduate student majoring in clinical medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences,Putian 351100, Fujian,China. 15059617484@163.com

graphic file with name fx5.jpg

Yuyao Zhang is a master's student of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, China. She is mainly working with her supervisor on tissue engineering and Lumbar degenerative disease. 937858379@qq.com

graphic file with name fx6.jpg

Zhihong Chen is an undergraduate student majoring in clinical medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences,Putian 351100, Fujian,China. 15159819075@163.com

graphic file with name fx7.jpg

Dingsu Bao is an associate chief orthopedic-joint surgeon and associate professor at the orthopedics department of the Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, China. He is currently focusing research on tendon-bone healing and scaffolds for tissue engineering and has published lots of scientific research articles associated with this field. 332639420@qq.com

graphic file with name fx8.jpg

Weihu Yang graduated in 2009 from Sichuan University with a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering. Principal investigator of two projects funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and two provincial-level projects including the Chongqing Natural Science Foundation. Has published over 30 papers in SCI journals such as Chemical Engineering Journal, Biomaterials Science, and Acta Biomaterialia, with more than 200 cumulative citations.

graphic file with name fx9.jpg

Huan Liu holds a Ph.D. in Chongqing University and a post-doctoral position in Southern Medical University. She is currently working mainly on bone tissue engineering, stem cells, biological 3D printing, and other related research at the Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan, China. She has published several scientific research articles related to the orthopedics. 20016040@163.com

Contributor Information

Zhenhong He, Email: hzhhzhhzh7@163.com.

Yi Liu, Email: 18981636587@163.com.

Yihuang Chen, Email: 18876343873@163.com.

Yuanqun Zhang, Email: 15059617484@163.com.

Yuyao Zhang, Email: 937858379@qq.com.

Zhihong Chen, Email: 15159819075@163.com.

Dingsu Bao, Email: 332639420@qq.com.

Weihu Yang, Email: yangweihu@cqu.edu.cn.

Huan Liu, Email: 20016040@163.com.

References

  • 1.Xiaoru S., Wenjuan M., Xueping X., Qianshun L., Shiyu L., Tao Z., et al. Neuroprotective effect of Tetrahedral DNA Nanostructures in a Cell Model of Alzheimer's Disease. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10 doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b07827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Qing-Hui Z., Ye-Zi Y., Chao W., Yi H., David O. Cyclic RGD-targeting of reversibly stabilized DNA nanoparticles enhances cell uptake and transfection in vitro. J Drug Target. 2009;17 doi: 10.1080/10611860902807046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Anders Hauge O., Jesper Sejrup N., Mathias V., Rasmus Schøler S., David S., Jørgen K. Quantification of cellular uptake of DNA nanostructures by qPCR. Methods. 2014;67 doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Le L., Jiang L., Qian L., Qing H., Jiye S., Hao Y., et al. Single-particle tracking and modulation of cell entry pathways of a tetrahedral DNA nanostructure in live cells. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014;53 doi: 10.1002/anie.201403236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Juan Z., Bin G., Jing X., Shuwen D., Na F., Shiyu L., et al. Crosstalk between adipose-derived stem cells and chondrocytes: when growth factors matter. Bone Res. 2016;4 doi: 10.1038/boneres.2015.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Qiang P., Xiao-Ru S., Jing X., Si-Rong S., Xue-Qin W., Tao Z., et al. Understanding the Biomedical Effects of the Self-Assembled Tetrahedral DNA Nanostructure on living Cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8 doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b03786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tian T., Zhang C., Li J., Liu Y., Wang Y., Ke X., et al. Proteomic Exploration of Endocytosis of Framework Nucleic Acids. Small. 2021;17 doi: 10.1002/smll.202100837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xuyang L., Zhiyuan Y., Ya W., Sirong S., Jie Y., Xiaorong F., et al. The immune regulatory effects of tetrahedral framework nucleic acid on human T cells via the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Cell Prolif. 2021;54 doi: 10.1111/cpr.13084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ralf D. Friedrich Miescher and the discovery of DNA. Dev Biol. 2005;278 doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.J, s. & d, w. Morpholino antisense oligomers: design, preparation, and properties. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev 7. 1997 doi: 10.1089/oli.1.1997.7.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Anjali G., Anuradha M., Nidhi P. Peptide nucleic acids: Advanced tools for biomedical applications. J Biotechnol. 2017;259 doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.07.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Miriam F., Henrik Ø. Locked nucleic acid holds promise in the treatment of cancer. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14 doi: 10.2174/138161208784246234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mark K., S., Lars-Oliver, E. & Eric, M. Atomic resolution duplex structure of the simplified nucleic acid GNA. Chem Commun (Camb) 2010;46 doi: 10.1039/b916851f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bohe Q., Qi W., Yuang W., Feng H., Haiyan W., Shuoxing J., et al. Enzymatic Synthesis of TNA Protects DNA Nanostructures. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2024;63 doi: 10.1002/anie.202317334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fahimeh F., Agustin S., Pilar B. Epigenome engineering in cancer: fairytale or a realistic path to the clinic? Front Oncol. 2015;5 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kumiko U.-T., Kenji N., Tomoko T., Tatsuya N. Thermodynamic Control of Small RNA-Mediated Gene Silencing. Front Genet. 2012;3 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Arrabito G., Ferrara V., Bonasera A., Pignataro B. Artificial Biosystems by Printing Biology. Small. 2020;16 doi: 10.1002/smll.201907691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huong Minh N., Shinya W., Sultana S., Tomofumi K., Xin-Ee T., Dhammika Leshan W., et al. RNA and Single-Stranded DNA Phages: Unveiling the Promise from the Underexplored World of Viruses. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24 doi: 10.3390/ijms242317029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dain L., Young-Bin Y., Jae-Ho C., A-Hyun, J., Su-Min, H., Ju-Chan, K. & Jun-Hwan, K. Viral Shrimp Diseases Listed by the OIE: a Review. Viruses. 2022;14 doi: 10.3390/v14030585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Midas S., Aderik V., Takahiro S., Enrico C. Mechanical properties of nucleic acids and the non-local twistable wormlike chain model. J Chem Phys. 2022;156 doi: 10.1063/5.0089166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nadrian C., S. DNA in a material world. Nature 421. 2003 doi: 10.1038/nature01406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Paul W.K., R. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 440. 2006 doi: 10.1038/nature04586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jeanette N., Dongran H., Yan L., Hao Y. DNA origami: a history and current perspective. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2010;14 doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.06.182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wenjuan M., Yuxi Z., Yuxin Z., Chenchen M., Xueping X., Yunfeng L. The biological applications of DNA nanomaterials: current challenges and future directions. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6 doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00727-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yuhang D., Chi Y., Yi Z., Lu Y., Dan L., Dayong Y. DNA Functional Materials Assembled from Branched DNA: Design, Synthesis, and applications. Chem Rev. 2020;120 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nadrian C., S. DNA Nanotechnology: from the Pub to Information-based Chemistry. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1811 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8582-1_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.N c, s. DNA nanotechnology: novel DNA constructions. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1998;27 doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.27.1.225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xingyu C., Yu X., Zhiqiang L., Yunfeng L. Application of Programmable Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acid-based Nanomaterials in Neurological Disorders: Progress and prospects. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.782237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang T., Tian T., Zhou R., Li S., Ma W., Zhang Y., et al. Design, fabrication and applications of tetrahedral DNA nanostructure-based multifunctional complexes in drug delivery and biomedical treatment. Nat Protoc. 2020;15:2728–2757. doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-0355-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Seeman N.C. Nucleic acid junctions and lattices. J Theor Biol. 1982;99:237–247. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(82)90002-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Seeman N.C., Sleiman H.F. DNA nanotechnology. Nat Rev Mater. 2017;3 doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.68. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.SeungHyeon K., Haipeng L., Yi C., Chengde M. DNA nanotubes as combinatorial vehicles for cellular delivery. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9 doi: 10.1021/bm800479e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Marco Z. Twist-stretch relations in nucleic acids. Eur Biophys J. 2023;52 doi: 10.1007/s00249-023-01669-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hyungmin J., Tyson R., S., Kaiming, Z., William P, B., Shanshan, L., Wah, C. & Mark, B. Automated Sequence Design of 3D Polyhedral Wireframe DNA Origami with Honeycomb Edges. ACS Nano. 2019;13 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b08671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.B c, c. & l e, o. The stability of different forms of double-stranded decoy DNA in serum and nuclear extracts. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20 doi: 10.1093/nar/20.21.5857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Carlos Ernesto C., Fabian K., Do-Nyun K., Enrique Lin S., Tobias W., Philipp W., et al. A primer to scaffolded DNA origami. Nat Methods 8. 2011 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Matthew D., M., David A, G., Dwight S, S., Louise E, L., Curt M, H. & Chad A, M. Regulating immune response using polyvalent nucleic acid-gold nanoparticle conjugates. Mol Pharm 6. 2009 doi: 10.1021/mp900172m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sara G., Natalya H., Tyler C., Wan K., Jeunghoon L., Cheryl J., et al. DNA topology influences molecular machine lifetime in human serum. Nanoscale 7. 2015 doi: 10.1039/c5nr02283e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jung-Won K., Harry B. Enhanced resistance of DNA nanostructures to enzymatic digestion. Chem Commun (Camb) 2009 doi: 10.1039/b917661f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Arun Richard C., Javier V., Paromita D., Siu Wah W.-D., Bijan K., D. & Ken, H. Exceptional Nuclease Resistance of Paranemic Crossover (PX) DNA and Crossover-Dependent Biostability of DNA Motifs. J Am Chem Soc 142. 2020 doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c02211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Xing W., Arun Richard C., Zhiyong S., Yoel P., O., Tong, W., Megan E, K., Ruojie, S., Chengde, M., Hao, Y., Xiaoping, Z., Shiping, L., Baoquan, D., Banani, C., Natasha, J., Dong, N., Hongzhou, G., Jie, C., Xiang, G., Yuhang, L., Tanashaya, C. & Nadrian C, S. Paranemic Crossover DNA: there and Back again. Chem Rev 119. 2018 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00207. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kyryl Z., Leo Y.T., C. & Warren C W, C. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A113. 2016. Controlling DNA-nanoparticle serum interactions. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Divita M., Katherine E., R., Sebastián A, D., Megan E, M., William P, K., Okhil K, N., Kwahun, L., Lauren D, F., James B, D. & Igor L, M. Determining the Cytosolic Stability of Small DNA Nanostructures In Cellula. Nano Lett. 2022;22 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c00917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Meihua L., Ping S., Guobao Z., Xiaolei Z., Ali A., Xiaoding L., et al. Electrochemical detection of nucleic acids, proteins, small molecules and cells using a DNA-nanostructure-based universal biosensing platform. Nat Protoc. 2016;11 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tao Z., Weitong C., Taoran T., Sirong S., Yunfeng L. Progress in Biomedical applications of Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acid-based Functional Systems. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12 doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c13806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tao Z., Taoran T., Yunfeng L. Functionalizing Framework Nucleic-Acid-based Nanostructures for Biomedical Application. Adv Mater. 2021;34 doi: 10.1002/adma.202107820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sirong S., Yang C., Taoran T., Songhang L., Shiyu L., Yuxin Z., et al. Effects of tetrahedral framework nucleic acid/wogonin complexes on osteoarthritis. Bone Res. 2020;8:6. doi: 10.1038/s41413-019-0077-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Xie X., Shao X., Ma W., Zhao D., Shi S., Li Q., et al. Overcoming drug-resistant lung cancer by paclitaxel loaded tetrahedral DNA nanostructures. Nanoscale. 2018;10:5457–5465. doi: 10.1039/c7nr09692e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hyukjin L., Abigail K.R., L.-J., Yi, C., Kevin T, L., Angela I, P., Emmanouil D, K., Alfica, S., William, Q., Christopher S, Z., Muthusamy, J., Chang G, P., Klaus, C., Anna, B., Muthiah, M., Jessica S, D., Jessica, T., Matthias, N., Robert, L. & Daniel G, A. Molecularly self-assembled nucleic acid nanoparticles for targeted in vivo siRNA delivery. Nat Nanotechnol 7. 2012 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2012.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Songhang L., Yue S., Taoran T., Xin Q., Shiyu L., Tao Z., et al. MicroRNA-214-3p modified tetrahedral framework nucleic acids target survivin to induce tumour cell apoptosis. Cell Prolif. 2019;53 doi: 10.1111/cpr.12708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wei M., Li S., Yang Z., Cheng C., Li T., Le W. Tetrahedral DNA nanostructures functionalized by multivalent microRNA132 antisense oligonucleotides promote the differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into dopaminergic neurons. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2021;34 doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2021.102375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jiang L., Hao P., Bing Z., Le L., Min W., Yao H., et al. Self-assembled multivalent DNA nanostructures for noninvasive intracellular delivery of immunostimulatory CpG oligonucleotides. ACS Nano. 2011;5 doi: 10.1021/nn202774x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Liu L., Rong Q., Ke G., Zhang M., Li J., Li Y., et al. Efficient and Reliable MicroRNA Imaging in living Cells via a FRET-Based Localized Hairpin-DNA Cascade Amplifier. Anal Chem. 2019;91:3675–3680. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sefah K., Shangguan D., Xiong X., O'Donoghue M., Tan W. Development of DNA aptamers using Cell-SELEX. Nat Protoc. 2010;5:1169–1185. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Erben, C., Goodman, R. & Turberfield, A. Single-molecule protein encapsulation in a rigid DNA cage. Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)45, 7414-7417 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200603392. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 56.Kim S., Kim K., Ahn D., Lee J., Yang E., Kim S. Reversible Regulation of Enzyme activity by pH-responsive Encapsulation in DNA Nanocages. ACS Nano. 2017;11:9352–9359. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b04766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kim K., Kim D., Lee T., Yhee J., Kim B., Kwon I., et al. Drug delivery by a self-assembled DNA tetrahedron for overcoming drug resistance in breast cancer cells. Chem Commun (Camb) 2013;49:2010–2012. doi: 10.1039/c3cc38693g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kyoung-Ran K., Hyo Young K., Yong-Deok L., Jong Seong H., Ji Hee K., Hansaem J., et al. Self-assembled mirror DNA nanostructures for tumor-specific delivery of anticancer drugs. J Control Release 243. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zhang M., Zhang X., Tian T., Zhang Q., Wen Y., Zhu J., et al. Anti-inflammatory activity of curcumin-loaded tetrahedral framework nucleic acids on acute gouty arthritis. Bioact Mater. 2022;8:368–380. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Li Y., Gao S., Shi S., Xiao D., Peng S., Gao Y., et al. Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acid-based delivery of Resveratrol Alleviates Insulin Resistance: from Innate to Adaptive Immunity. Nano-micro letters. 2021;13:86. doi: 10.1007/s40820-021-00614-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Xiaoru S., Shiyu L., Qiang P., Sirong S., Xueqin W., Tao Z., et al. Tetrahedral DNA Nanostructure: a potential Promoter for Cartilage Tissue Regeneration via Regulating Chondrocyte Phenotype and Proliferation. Small. 2017;13 doi: 10.1002/smll.201602770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Li S., Liu Y., Tian T., Zhang T., Lin S., Zhou M., et al. Bioswitchable delivery of microRNA by Framework Nucleic Acids: Application to Bone Regeneration. Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse. 2021;Germany) 17 doi: 10.1002/smll.202104359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Qi L., Hong S., Zhao T., Yan J., Ge W., Wang J., et al. DNA Tetrahedron Delivering miR-21-5p Promotes Senescent Bone Defects Repair through Synergistic Regulation of Osteogenesis and Angiogenesis. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13 doi: 10.1002/adhm.202401275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Shi S., Lin S., Li Y., Zhang T., Shao X., Tian T., et al. Effects of tetrahedral DNA nanostructures on autophagy in chondrocytes. Chem Commun (Camb) 2018;54:1327–1330. doi: 10.1039/c7cc09397g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhou M., Liu N., Zhang Q., Tian T., Ma Q., Zhang T., et al. Effect of tetrahedral DNA nanostructures on proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cells. Cell Prolif. 2019;52 doi: 10.1111/cpr.12566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mi Z., Shaojingya G., Xiaolin Z., Tianxu Z., Tao Z., Taoran T., et al. The protective effect of tetrahedral framework nucleic acids on periodontium under inflammatory conditions. Bioact Mater. 2020;6 doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zhao D., Cui W., Liu M., Li J., Sun Y., Shi S., et al. Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acid Promotes the Treatment of Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws by Promoting Angiogenesis and M2 Polarization. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:44508–44522. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c13839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Li D., Yang Z., Luo Y., Zhao X., Tian M., Kang P. Delivery of MiR335-5p-Pendant Tetrahedron DNA Nanostructures using an Injectable Heparin Lithium Hydrogel for Challenging Bone Defects in Steroid-Associated Osteonecrosis. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022;11 doi: 10.1002/adhm.202101412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Tsuchiya A., Takeuchi S., Watanabe T., Yoshida T., Nojiri S., Ogawa M., et al. Mesenchymal stem cell therapies for liver cirrhosis: MSCs as “conducting cells” for improvement of liver fibrosis and regeneration. Inflammation and regeneration. 2019;39:18. doi: 10.1186/s41232-019-0107-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Alfaifi M., Eom Y., Newsome P., Baik S. Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy for liver diseases. J Hepatol. 2018;68:1272–1285. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.01.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wang J., Ren H., Yuan X., Ma H., Shi X., Ding Y. Interleukin-10 secreted by mesenchymal stem cells attenuates acute liver failure through inhibiting pyroptosis. Hepatol Res. 2018;48:E194–E202. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Luo X., Meng X., Cao D., Wang W., Zhou K., Li L., et al. Transplantation of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells attenuates liver fibrosis in mice by regulating macrophage subtypes. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10:16. doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-1122-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Dominici M., Le Blanc K., Mueller I., Slaper-Cortenbach I., Marini F., Krause D., et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. the International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8:315–317. doi: 10.1080/14653240600855905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Gangji V., Soyfoo M., Heuschling A., Afzali V., Moreno-Reyes R., Rasschaert J., et al. Non traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head is associated with low bone mass. Bone. 2018;107:88–92. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Houdek M., Wyles C., Collins M., Howe B., Terzic A., Behfar A., et al. Stem Cells combined with Platelet-rich Plasma Effectively Treat Corticosteroid-induced Osteonecrosis of the Hip: a prospective Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476:388–397. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zhun W., Donghai L., Zhouyuan Y., Haiyan Z., Pengde K. Efficiency of Cell Therapy to GC-Induced ONFH: BMSCs with Dkk-1 Interference is not Superior to Unmodified BMSCs. Stem Cells Int. 2018;2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/1340252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hardy R., Zhou H., Seibel M., Cooper M. Glucocorticoids and Bone: Consequences of Endogenous and Exogenous Excess and Replacement Therapy. Endocr Rev. 2018;39:519–548. doi: 10.1210/er.2018-00097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Jing X., Du T., Yang X., Zhang W., Wang G., Liu X., et al. Desferoxamine protects against glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head via activating HIF-1α expression. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235:9864–9875. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Matsushita Y., Nagata M., Kozloff K., Welch J., Mizuhashi K., Tokavanich N., et al. A Wnt-mediated transformation of the bone marrow stromal cell identity orchestrates skeletal regeneration. Nat Commun. 2020;11:332. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14029-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Rauner M., Rachner T., Hofbauer L. Bone Formation and the Wnt Signaling Pathway. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1902. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1609768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sui L., Wang M., Han Q., Yu L., Zhang L., Zheng L., et al. A novel Lipidoid-MicroRNA formulation promotes calvarial bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2018;177:88–97. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.05.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Colditz J., Thiele S., Baschant U., Garbe A., Niehrs C., Hofbauer L., et al. Osteogenic Dkk1 Mediates Glucocorticoid-Induced but not Arthritis-Induced Bone loss. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res. 2019;34:1314–1323. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Yu H., Yue J., Wang W., Liu P., Zuo W., Guo W., et al. Icariin promotes angiogenesis in glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis of femoral heads: In vitro and in vivo studies. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23:7320–7330. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Li D., Xie X., Kang P., Shen B., Pei F., Wang C. Percutaneously drilling through femoral head and neck fenestration combining with compacted autograft for early femoral head necrosis: a retrospective study. Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. 2017;22:1060–1065. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zhou M., Xi J., Cheng Y., Sun D., Shu P., Chi S., et al. Reprogrammed mesenchymal stem cells derived from iPSCs promote bone repair in steroid-associated osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12:175. doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02249-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zhang J., Tu Q., Bonewald L., He X., Stein G., Lian J., et al. Effects of miR-335-5p in modulating osteogenic differentiation by specifically downregulating Wnt antagonist DKK1. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:1953–1963. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Zhang L., Tang Y., Zhu X., Tu T., Sui L., Han Q., et al. Overexpression of MiR-335-5p Promotes Bone Formation and Regeneration in mice. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res. 2017;32:2466–2475. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Qi L., Ge W., Pan C., Jiang W., Lin D., Zhang L. viaCompromised osteogenic effect of exosomes internalized by senescent bone marrow stem cells endocytoses involving clathrin, macropinocytosis and caveolae. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1090914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Qi L., Pan C., Yan J., Ge W., Wang J., Liu L., et al. Mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds for the delivery of bone marrow stem cell-derived osteoinductive extracellular vesicles lncRNA promote senescent bone defect repair by targeting the miR-1843a-5p/Mob3a/YAP axis. Acta Biomater. 2024;177:486–505. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.01.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Sun S., Liu Z., Zhou H., Li G., Liu M., Yao J., et al. The role of fucosylation in the promotion of endothelial progenitor cells in neovascularization and bone repair. Biomaterials. 2014;35:3777–3785. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Wang G., Shen Y., Chou W., Tang C., Yeh H., Wang L., et al. Senescence Induces Dysfunctions in Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Osteoblasts by Interfering Translational Machinery and Bioenergetic Homeostasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19 doi: 10.3390/ijms19071997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Li J., Lai Y., Li M., Chen X., Zhou M., Wang W., et al. Repair of infected bone defect with Clindamycin-Tetrahedral DNA nanostructure Complex-loaded 3D bioprinted hybrid scaffold. Chem Eng J. 2022;435 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.134855. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Reza T., Pooya T., Alexander C., Stephanie W., Hoiwan C., Majid C., et al. Emerging Targets for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis: New Investigational Methods to Identify Neo-Vessels as possible Targets for Embolization. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;12 doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Bernd R., James M., W., Alan J, G., Klaus E, K. & Ada A, C. Distinct horizontal patterns in the spatial organization of superficial zone chondrocytes of human joints. J Struct Biol 162. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2008.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Nick, v. G., Steve, S., Guy, E., Sandra, S., Aurélie, C., Veerle W, D., Ninib, B., Dariusz, P., Maarten, D., Pieter-Jan, S., Dennis, L., Riet, V. L., Sophie, T., Azeem, S., Patrizia, A., Diether, L., Frederik, M., Johan V, S., Liesbet, G., Hans, V. O., Bernard, T., Peter, C., David T, S. & Geert, C. Lipid availability determines fate of skeletal progenitor cells via SOX9. Nature 579. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2050-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.David A., W. Angiogenesis in osteoarthritis and spondylosis: successful repair with undesirable outcomes. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2004;16 doi: 10.1097/01.bor.0000133662.60223.ee. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.M, m., k, y. & k, m. The potential role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in cartilage: how the angiogenic factor could be involved in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis? Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;16 doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Honner R., Thompson R.C. The Nutritional Pathways of Articular Cartilage. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1971;53:742–748. doi: 10.2106/00004623-197153040-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kendrick T., Bridget Z., Karl R., Christopher M., Wasim K. Synovium-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation in Cartilage Regeneration: a PRISMA Review of in vivo Studies. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Qi L., Huilei Y., Muyang S., Peng Y., Xiaoqing H., Yingfang A., et al. The tissue origin effect of extracellular vesicles on cartilage and bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2021;125 doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.02.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Pinxue L., Liwei F., Zhiyao L., Yu P., Chao N., Cangjian G., et al. Chitosan hydrogel/3D-printed poly(ε-caprolactone) hybrid scaffold containing synovial mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage regeneration based on tetrahedral framework nucleic acid recruitment. Biomaterials. 2021;278 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Brian J., H., Jerry C, H. & Kyriacos A, A. Cell-based tissue engineering strategies used in the clinical repair of articular cartilage. Biomaterials. 2016;98 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.04.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Sabina P., Anna S., Sahar I.D., Daniel R.A., Paula O., Lena N., et al. Meet me halfway: are in vitro 3D cancer models on the way to replace in vivo models for nanomedicine development? Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;175 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Chatchai M., Varanuj C. Chitosan oligosaccharide: Biological activities and potential therapeutic applications. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;170 doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Daphney R., C., Biao, H., Ying, Z., Chao, W., Sheila M, A., Prashant, C., Bryan, K., Su-Jin, H., Motomi, E.-I., X Lucas, L., Dehan, K., Renato V, I., David E, B., Robert L, M. & Lin, H. Decorin regulates cartilage pericellular matrix micromechanobiology. Matrix Biol. 2020;96 doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2020.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Xiao-Ru S., Shi-Yu L., Qiang P., Si-Rong S., Xiao-Long L., Tao Z., et al. Effect of tetrahedral DNA nanostructures on osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells via activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2017;13 doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2017.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Abbott J., Holtzer H. The loss of phenotypic traits by differentiated cells. 3. the reversible behavior of chondrocytes in primary cultures. J Cell Biol. 1966;28:473–487. doi: 10.1083/jcb.28.3.473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Brittberg M., Lindahl A., Nilsson A., Ohlsson C., Isaksson O., Peterson L. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:889–895. doi: 10.1056/nejm199410063311401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Shebin H., Weidong J., Qinfeng D., Kaili L., Cancan Z., Xudong W. The Current Progress of Tetrahedral DNA Nanostructure for Antibacterial Application and Bone Tissue Regeneration. Int J Nanomed. 2023;18 doi: 10.2147/ijn.S403882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Shi S., Tian T., Li Y., Xiao D., Zhang T., Gong P., et al. Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acid Inhibits Chondrocyte Apoptosis and Oxidative stress through Activation of Autophagy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:56782–56791. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c17307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Meijer A., Codogno P. Signalling and autophagy regulation in health, aging and disease. Mol Aspects Med. 2006;27:411–425. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2006.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Niina H., Frances H., Roger B., Erden A., Neil R., John W. Peripheral blood derived mononuclear cells enhance osteoarthritic human chondrocyte migration. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17 doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0709-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Xianpeng G., Ruirui S., Xuchen M. The secreted protein WNT5A regulates condylar chondrocyte proliferation, hypertrophy and migration. Arch Oral Biol. 2017;82 doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.T i, m. Chondrocyte moves: clever strategies? Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15 doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.02.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Csaba M., János F., László C., Róza Z. Purinergic signalling-evoked intracellular Ca(2+) concentration changes in the regulation of chondrogenesis and skeletal muscle formation. Cell Calcium. 2016;59 doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2016.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Marcin S., Edyta G.-D. Extracellular Nucleotides Selectively Induce Migration of Chondrocytes and Expression of Type II Collagen. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21 doi: 10.3390/ijms21155227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Peter G., Jiehua W., Susan S., Andrew Cw Z., Stan G., Silviu I. Pentosan polysulfate promotes proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation of adult human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal precursor cells. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12 doi: 10.1186/ar2935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Kenji K., Susumu S., Noriaki M., Masakazu M., Atsushi Y., Yasuhumi K., et al. Sodium pentosan polysulfate resulted in cartilage improvement in knee osteoarthritis–an open clinical trial. BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2010;10 doi: 10.1186/1472-6904-10-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Eugene C., B., Sangho, K., Jing, F., H M Suranji, W., Kenji, H. & Masahiro, O. Pentosan polysulfate inhibits IL-1β-induced iNOS, c-Jun and HIF-1α upregulation in canine articular chondrocytes. PLoS One. 2017;12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Yves H., Christelle S., Marc B. Pharmaceutical and nutraceutical management of canine osteoarthritis: present and future perspectives. Vet J. 2005;170 doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Ekkapol A., Eugene C., B., Sangho, K., Takafumi, S., Ryosuke, E. & Masahiro, O. Effects of pentosan polysulfate on cell proliferation, cell cycle progression and cyclin-dependent kinases expression in canine articular chondrocytes. J Vet Med Sci. 2020;82 doi: 10.1292/jvms.20-0091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Anthony S., W., HaiFang, Y., Christoph M, E., Matthew J A, W. & Andrew J, T. DNA cage delivery to mammalian cells. ACS Nano 5. 2011 doi: 10.1021/nn2005574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Tea F., Sylvie R., Daniel L., Joerg H. Wnt/beta-catenin is essential for intestinal homeostasis and maintenance of intestinal stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27 doi: 10.1128/mcb.01034-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Jianya Z., Jingling H., Junkang J., Shangshi S., Xia M., Xinhang L., et al. The downregulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is associated with zinc deficiency-induced proliferative deficit of C17.2 neural stem cells. Brain Res. 1615 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Elizabeth J., T., Karla A, K. & Leor S, W. Exploiting Genetic Interference for Antiviral Therapy. PLoS Genet. 2016;12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Carolina Beltrame D.D., Qulsum M., Sowmya P., Saumi M., Xiaohuan X., Li Z., et al. Notch Signaling Activates Stem Cell Properties of Müller Glia through Transcriptional Regulation and Skp2-mediated Degradation of p27Kip1. PLoS One. 2016;11 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Syed A., A., Verline, J., Lee, J., Nicole R, M. & Alan P, F. Protein Kinase Cι Drives a NOTCH3-dependent Stem-like Phenotype in Mutant KRAS Lung Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2016;29 doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Cuicui W., Jason A., I., Anthony J, M., Yinshi, R., Zhaoyang, L., Jie, S., Regis J, O. K., Hani A, A. & Matthew J, H. NOTCH signaling in skeletal progenitors is critical for fracture repair. J Clin Invest 126. 2016 doi: 10.1172/jci80672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Tiziana S., Gianfranco P., Umberto G. Clinical Trials with Mesenchymal Stem Cells: an Update. Cell Transplant. 2015;25 doi: 10.3727/096368915x689622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Kong X., Liu Y., Ye R., Zhu B., Zhu Y., Liu X., et al. GSK3β is a checkpoint for TNF-α-mediated impaired osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in inflammatory microenvironments. BBA. 2013;1830:5119–5129. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Seo B., Miura M., Gronthos S., Bartold P., Batouli S., Brahim J., et al. Investigation of multipotent postnatal stem cells from human periodontal ligament. Lancet (London, England) 2004;364:149–155. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16627-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Weerachai S., Nikolaos D., Irwin O. Isolation and characterization of stem cell clones from adult human ligament. Tissue Eng A. 2009;15 doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2008.0442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Jinping X., Wei W., Yvonne K., Jeffrey L., Sunil K. Multiple differentiation capacity of STRO-1+/CD146+ PDL mesenchymal progenitor cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2008;18 doi: 10.1089/scd.2008.0113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.I c, g., s, c. & m, m. Isolation and characterization of multipotent human periodontal ligament stem cells. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2007;10 doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2007.00399.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Bo-Han Y., Qian Z., Zuo-Lin W. Periodontal ligament versus bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in combination with Bio-Oss scaffolds for ectopic and in situ bone formation: a comparative study in the rat. J Biomater Appl. 2014;29 doi: 10.1177/0885328214521846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Qunzhou Z., Shihong S., Yi L., Jettie U., Yufang S., Songtao S., et al. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from human gingiva are capable of immunomodulatory functions and ameliorate inflammation-related tissue destruction in experimental colitis. J Immunol 183. 2009 doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.David M, D., Joseph, C., Antoine, D., Steve L, D., Anthony J J, D., Jaafar, M. & Bruno, G. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a second-generation platelet concentrate. Part I: technological concepts and evolution. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 138.Jing Z., Zhi-Gang L., Ya-Meng S., Bin C., Jian M. The difference on the osteogenic differentiation between periodontal ligament stem cells and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells under inflammatory microenviroments. Differentiation. 2014;88 doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2014.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Schilling E., Weiss R., Grahnert A., Bitar M., Sack U., Hauschildt S. Molecular mechanism of LPS-induced TNF-α biosynthesis in polarized human macrophages. Mol Immunol. 2018;93:206–215. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2017.11.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.T, n., y, k., s, y., a, k., k, e., h, s. & h, s. Protein expression and functional difference of membrane-bound and soluble receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand: modulation of the expression by osteotropic factors and cytokines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 275. 2000 doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Mi Z., Nan-Xin L., Si-Rong S., Yong L., Qi Z., Quan-Quan M., et al. Effect of tetrahedral DNA nanostructures on proliferation and osteo/odontogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells via activation of the notch signaling pathway. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2018;14 doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2018.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Redlich K., Smolen J. Inflammatory bone loss: pathogenesis and therapeutic intervention. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11:234–250. doi: 10.1038/nrd3669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Qi Z., Shiyu L., Sirong S., Tao Z., Quanquan M., Taoran T., et al. Anti-inflammatory and Antioxidative Effects of Tetrahedral DNA Nanostructures via the Modulation of Macrophage responses. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10 doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b17928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Kim E., Choi E. Pathological roles of MAPK signaling pathways in human diseases. BBA. 2010;1802:396–405. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2009.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Denis F., K., Panagiota G, S. & Panos N, P. Periodontal diseases. Nat Rev Dis Primers 3. 2017 doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.38. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Yuhei N., Hideaki H., Mineo K., Samin H., Takeshi M. Oxidative stress in Retinal Diseases. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/4076518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Hans-Peter H. Diabetic retinopathy: hyperglycaemia, oxidative stress and beyond. Diabetologia. 2017;61 doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4435-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Olvera-Montaño C., Castellanos-González J.A., Navarro-Partida J., Cardona-Muñoz E.G., López-Contreras A.K., Roman-Pintos L.M., et al. Oxidative stress as the Main Target in Diabetic Retinopathy Pathophysiology. J Diabetes Res. 2019;2019 doi: 10.1155/2019/8562408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Jun Z., Han Z., Baihua C. DJ-1/PARK7 inhibits high glucose-induced oxidative stress to prevent retinal pericyte apoptosis via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Exp Eye Res. 2019;189 doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2019.107830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Wanpeng W., Han Z., Baihua C. DJ-1 protects retinal pericytes against high glucose-induced oxidative stress through the Nrf2 signaling pathway. Sci Rep. 2020;10 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59408-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Vera L., B., Brent A, B., Mary E, R., Xiaoping, Y., Charlie, K., Gregory H, G., Ivy S, S., Joe G, H., Chengsong, X., Huaibin, C. & Karen G, S. Loss of DJ-1 elicits retinal abnormalities, visual dysfunction, and increased oxidative stress in mice. Exp Eye Res 139. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2015.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Mala U., Caroline M., Brent A., B. & Vera L, B. Oxidative stress in the retina and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE): Role of aging, and DJ-1. Redox Biol. 2020;37 doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Kwok A., Raulf N., Habib N. Developing Small Activating RNA As a Therapeutic: current challenges and promises. Ther Deliv. 2019;10:151–164. doi: 10.4155/tde-2018-0061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Qiaowei W., Jingyi Z., Xianggui Z., Xiaoxiao X., Delun L., Yunfeng L., et al. The antioxidant effect of tetrahedral framework nucleic acid-based delivery of small activating RNA targeting DJ-1 on retinal oxidative stress injury. Cell Prolif. 2024;57 doi: 10.1111/cpr.13635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Jonas J.B., Aung T., Bourne R.R., Bron A.M., Ritch R., Panda-Jonas S. Glaucoma. Lancet. 2017;390:2183–2193. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31469-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.N. Robert W., Tin, A. & Felipe A, M. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA 311 2014 10.1001/jama.2014.3192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 157.Michal S. Lessons for glaucoma from other neurodegenerative diseases: can one treatment suit them all? J Glaucoma. 2005;14 doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000169412.86387.ad. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Ben M., Stanislav T. Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Derived Exosomes Promote Survival of Retinal Ganglion Cells through miRNA-dependent Mechanisms. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017;6 doi: 10.1002/sctm.16-0428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Jinhuai H., Yong H., Yuanhua W., Fengjun L., Dong S., Kexin W., et al. NTRK2 is an oncogene and associated with microRNA-22 regulation in human gastric cancer cell lines. Tumour Biol. 2016;37 doi: 10.1007/s13277-016-5337-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Muiños-Gimeno M., Espinosa-Parrilla Y., Guidi M., Kagerbauer B., Sipilä T., Maron E., et al. Human microRNAs miR-22, miR-138-2, miR-148a, and miR-488 are Associated with panic Disorder and Regulate Several anxiety Candidate Genes and Related Pathways. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;69:526–533. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Li J., Xiao L., Yan N., Li Y., Wang Y., Qin X., et al. The Neuroprotective effect of MicroRNA‐22‐3p Modified Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acids on Damaged Retinal Neurons Via TrkB/BDNF Signaling Pathway. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202104141. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Jie G., Junlong W., Shen S., Qin L., Yulong H., Yunfei X., et al. Sphallerocarpus gracilis polysaccharide protects pancreatic β-cells via regulation of the bax/bcl-2, caspase-3, pdx-1 and insulin signalling pathways. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;93 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.08.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Peng-Fei H., Wei-Ping C., Jia-Peng B., Li-Dong W. Paeoniflorin inhibits IL-1β-induced chondrocyte apoptosis by regulating the Bax/Bcl-2/caspase-3 signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17 doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Wanessa Carvalho P., Vieira B.A., L., Flávia, d. C. P., Aliny Pereira, L., Francyelli, M.-A., Hugo Delleon, S., Monize Martins, d. S., Legna, C.-V., Javier, E., Alzir A, B. & Elisângela, d. P. S.-L. Ru(II)/diphenylphosphine/pyridine-6-thiolate complexes induce S-180 cell apoptosis through intrinsic mitochondrial pathway involving inhibition of Bcl-2 and p53/Bax activation. Mol Cell Biochem 438. 2017 doi: 10.1007/s11010-017-3129-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Mowla S.J., Farhadi H.F., Pareek S., Atwal J.K., Morris S.J., Seidah N.G., et al. Biosynthesis and Post-translational Processing of the Precursor to Brain-derived Neurotrophic factor. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:12660–12666. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008104200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Rui Y., Shufa Z., Caixia Q. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor fused with a collagen-binding domain inhibits neuroinflammation and promotes neurological recovery of traumatic brain injury mice via TrkB signalling. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2020;72 doi: 10.1111/jphp.13233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Gillipsie M., Jyoti S., Nooruddin K. Cellular stress Response and Immune Signaling in Retinal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Front Immunol. 2016;7 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Xintong Z., Mingwei W., Shuting L., Haiqiao C., Yifei L., Fa Y., et al. A lncRNA-encoded mitochondrial micropeptide exacerbates microglia-mediated neuroinflammation in retinal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14 doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-05617-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Mark J. M Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2019;25 doi: 10.1212/con.0000000000000767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Cheung N., Mitchell P., Wong T.Y. Diabetic retinopathy. Lancet. 2010;376:124–136. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)62124-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Xiaoxiao X., Yanyan F., Delun L., Lina Z., Xi H., Yingying C., et al. Therapeutic effects of tetrahedral framework nucleic acids and tFNAs-miR22 on retinal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Cell Prolif. 2024;57 doi: 10.1111/cpr.13695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Carmeliet P., Jain R. Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature. 2011;473:298–307. doi: 10.1038/nature10144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Robert A., L. & Hao F, Z. Retinal oxygen: from animals to humans. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017;58 doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Elisabeth C., K., John, G. & Ryan B, M. The “Neuro-Glial-Vascular” Unit: the Role of Glia in Neurovascular Unit Formation and Dysfunction. Front Cell Dev Biol 9. 2021 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.732820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Monica R., M. & Eric A, N. Signalling within the neurovascular unit in the mammalian retina. Exp Physiol. 2007;92 doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2006.036376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Samantha S., Costantino I. Revisiting the neurovascular unit. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24 doi: 10.1038/s41593-021-00904-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Sohan Singh H. Photocoagulation for retinal vein occlusion. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021;85 doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.100964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.F. Ray G. & Thomas W, G. Retinal angiogenesis in development and disease. Nature 438 2005 10.1038/nature04482. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 179.David S. Ocular drug development–future directions. Angiogenesis. 2007;10 doi: 10.1007/s10456-007-9068-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Shuang W., James K., P. & Elia J, D. Novel targets against retinal angiogenesis in diabetic retinopathy. Curr Diab Rep. 2012;12 doi: 10.1007/s11892-012-0289-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Chan-Ling T., Gole G.A., Quinn G.E., Adamson S.J., Darlow B.A. Pathophysiology, screening and treatment of ROP: a multi-disciplinary perspective. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018;62:77–119. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Sjakon G., T., Rini, H., Geoffrey C, L., Shunji, K. & Paul G, M. Fluorescein angiographic observations of peripheral retinal vessel growth in infants after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab as sole therapy for zone I and posterior zone II retinopathy of prematurity. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98 doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Yiran T., Akira F., Michelle T., S., Shane, D., Jagjit, G. & Weng Onn, C. Anti-VEGF crunch syndrome in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2021;66 doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Jameel M., A.-K., Gandasi Ravikumar, S., Praveen, N., Biljo V, J., Fatima M, A. & Muneera Q, A.-M. Flavonoids as potential Anti-Inflammatory Molecules: a Review. Molecules. 2022;27 doi: 10.3390/molecules27092901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Yao L., Jiaying Y., Chunyan H., Jiaxin Y., Maria Tabassum C., Shengnan W., et al. Inflammation and Immunity Nutrients 8. 2016 doi: 10.3390/nu8030167. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Liu Z., Chen X., Ma W., Gao Y., Yao Y., Li J., et al. Suppression of Lipopolysaccharide‐Induced Sepsis by Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acid Loaded with Quercetin. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202204587. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Yili J., Xiaodi Z., Limei C., Xiaoxiao X., Wenjia Y., Qiong W., et al. Framework Nucleic Acids Loaded with Quercetin: Protecting Retinal Neurovascular Unit via the Protein Kinase B/Heme Oxygenase-1 Pathway. ACS Nano. 2024 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c05845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Xin Q., Ni L., Mei Z., Shiyu L., Junyao Z., Dexuan X., et al. Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids prevent retina ischemia-reperfusion injury from oxidative stress via activating the Akt/Nrf2 pathway. Nanoscale. 2019;11 doi: 10.1039/c9nr07171g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Nanxin L., Xiaolin Z., Ni L., Mi Z., Tianxu Z., Songhang L., et al. Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acids Promote Corneal Epithelial Wound Healing in Vitro and in Vivo. Small. 2019;15 doi: 10.1002/smll.201901907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Xiaodi Z., Yanting L., Xiaoxiao X., Qiong W., Limei S., Limei C., et al. Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids inhibit pathological neovascularization and vaso-obliteration in ischaemic retinopathy via PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway. Cell Prolif. 2023;56 doi: 10.1111/cpr.13407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Zhen Ling, T., Yih-Chung, T., Marco, Y., Miao Li, C., Tyler Hyungtaek, R., Ning, C., Mukharram M, B., Ya Xing, W., Yating, T., Yi, L., Ian Y, W., Daniel Shu Wei, T., Gavin Siew Wei, T., Jost B, J., Charumathi, S., Tien Yin, W. & Ching-Yu, C. Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy and Projection of Burden through 2045: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ophthalmology128 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.04.027. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 192.Ryan L., Tien Y., W. & Charumathi, S. Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema and related vision loss. Eye Vis (Lond) 2015;2 doi: 10.1186/s40662-015-0026-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.David A., A., Ronald, K. & Thomas W, G. Diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med 366. 2012 doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1005073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Lesley A., E. & Yannis M, P. Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema. Curr Diab Rep. 2021;21 doi: 10.1007/s11892-021-01403-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Stefano F., Marzia D.R., Eleonora R., Chiara P., Michele F., Romano D. Clinical pharmacology of intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs. Eye (Lond) 2018;32 doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0021-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Orathai T., Surapon T. Oxidative stress, Ocular Disease and Diabetes Retinopathy. Curr Pharm Des. 2019;24 doi: 10.2174/1381612825666190115121531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Xiaoru S., Zhong H., Huiqin S., Yuzhong W., Yunfeng L. Effects of tension on mitochondrial autophagy and osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells. Cell Prolif. 2023;57 doi: 10.1111/cpr.13561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Ryan J., M. An Update on Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species Production. Antioxidants (Basel) 2020;9 doi: 10.3390/antiox9060472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Ferrington D.A., Fisher C.R., Kowluru R.A. Mitochondrial Defects Drive Degenerative Retinal Diseases. Trends Mol Med. 2020;26:105–118. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2019.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Jun W., Xiangyou L., Geli Z., Yanxia Z., Min H., Jian Z. The role of Resveratrol-induced mitophagy/autophagy in peritoneal mesothelial cells inflammatory injury via NLRP3 inflammasome activation triggered by mitochondrial ROS. Exp Cell Res. 2016;341 doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Qian Z., Zhiyuan T., Guoyu Z., Qiang N., Jingwen C., Pei L., et al. SIRT1-dependent mitochondrial biogenesis supports therapeutic effects of resveratrol against neurodevelopment damage by fluoride. Theranostics. 2020;10 doi: 10.7150/thno.42387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Qi Z., Cong Z., Jing G., Mei-Wei L., Milton T., Kai G., et al. Ameliorative effects of resveratrol against cadmium-induced nephrotoxicity via modulating nuclear xenobiotic receptor response and PINK1/Parkin-mediated Mitophagy. Food Funct. 2020;11 doi: 10.1039/c9fo02287b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Li C., Tan Y., Wu J., Ma Q., Bai S., Xia Z., et al. Resveratrol Improves Bnip3-Related Mitophagy and Attenuates High-Fat-Induced Endothelial Dysfunction. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Virginie A., Dominique D. Common pathways in health benefit properties of RSV in cardiovascular diseases, cancers and degenerative pathologies. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2015;16 doi: 10.2174/1389201016666150118132457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Gupta A., Das R., Yesilbag Tonga G., Mizuhara T., Rotello V. Charge-Switchable Nanozymes for Bioorthogonal Imaging of Biofilm-Associated Infections. ACS Nano. 2018;12:89–94. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b07496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Kim L. Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;5 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Luanne H.-S., William J., C. & Paul, S. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol 2. 2004 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.J w, c., p s, s. & e p, g. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284. 1999 doi: 10.1126/science.284.5418.1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Neethirajan S., Clond M., Vogt; A. Medical biofilms–nanotechnology approaches. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2014;10:2806–2827. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2014.1892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Ning X., Lee S., Wang Z., Kim D., Stubblefield B., Gilbert E., et al. Maltodextrin-based imaging probes detect bacteria in vivo with high sensitivity and specificity. Nat Mater. 2011;10:602–607. doi: 10.1038/nmat3074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Hegarty J., Stewart D. Advances in therapeutic bacterial antisense biotechnology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:1055–1065. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8671-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Santajit S., Sookrung N., Indrawattana N. Quorum Sensing in ESKAPE Bugs: a Target for Combating Antimicrobial Resistance and Bacterial Virulence. Biology. 2022;11 doi: 10.3390/biology11101466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Koonin E., Senkevich T., Dolja V. The ancient Virus World and evolution of cells. Biol Direct. 2006;1:29. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-1-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Suttle C. Viruses in the sea. Nature. 2005;437:356–361. doi: 10.1038/nature04160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Martiny J., Riemann L., Marston M., Middelboe M. Antagonistic coevolution of marine planktonic viruses and their hosts. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2014;6:393–414. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Clokie M., Millard A., Letarov A., Heaphy S. Phages in nature Bacteriophage. 2011;1:31–45. doi: 10.4161/bact.1.1.14942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Retel C., Märkle H., Becks L., Feulner P. Ecological and Evolutionary Processes Shaping Viral Genetic Diversity. Viruses. 2019;11 doi: 10.3390/v11030220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Ozono S., Zhang Y., Ode H., Sano K., Tan T., Imai K., et al. SARS-CoV-2 D614G spike mutation increases entry efficiency with enhanced ACE2-binding affinity. Nat Commun. 2021;12:848. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21118-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Yang Z., Han Y., Ding S., Finzi A., Mothes W. & Lu, M. 2021 doi: 10.1101/2021.10.11.463956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Zhang L., Pornpattananangku D., Hu C., Huang C. Development of nanoparticles for antimicrobial drug delivery. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17:585–594. doi: 10.2174/092986710790416290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Qinqin H., Hua L., Lihua W., Hongzhou G., Chunhai F. DNA Nanotechnology-Enabled Drug delivery Systems. Chem Rev. 2018;119 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Dongdong Z., Zehua W., Zhiqiang M., Peng W., Lili S., Wei W., et al. DNA Tetrahedral Nanostructure-based Electrochemical miRNA Biosensor for Simultaneous Detection of Multiple miRNAs in Pancreatic Carcinoma. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9 doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b05981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Dawei J., Yanhong S., Jiang L., Qian L., Min L., Bing Z., et al. Multiple-Armed Tetrahedral DNA Nanostructures for Tumor-Targeting, Dual-Modality in Vivo Imaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8 doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b10792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Zhang B., Qin X., Zhou M., Tian T., Sun Y., Li S., et al. Tetrahedral DNA nanostructure improves transport efficiency and anti-fungal effect of histatin 5 against Candida albicans. Cell Prolif. 2021;54 doi: 10.1111/cpr.13020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Yuxin Z., Xueping X., Wenjuan M., Yuxi Z., Chenchen M., Xiaoru S., et al. Multi-targeted Antisense Oligonucleotide delivery by a Framework Nucleic Acid for Inhibiting Biofilm Formation and Virulence. Nanomicro Lett. 2020;12 doi: 10.1007/s40820-020-0409-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Liu Y., Sun Y., Li S., Liu M., Qin X., Chen X., et al. Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acids deliver Antimicrobial Peptides with improved Effects and less Susceptibility to Bacterial Degradation. Nano Lett. 2020;20:3602–3610. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Nordström R., Malmsten M. Delivery systems for antimicrobial peptides. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;242:17–34. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2017.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Sun H., Hong Y., Xi Y., Zou Y., Gao J., Du J. Synthesis, Self-Assembly, and Biomedical applications of Antimicrobial Peptide-Polymer Conjugates. Biomacromolecules. 2018;19:1701–1720. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Ciumac D., Gong H., Hu X., Lu J. Membrane targeting cationic antimicrobial peptides. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;537:163–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.10.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Lam S., O'Brien-Simpson N., Pantarat N., Sulistio A., Wong E., Chen Y., et al. Combating multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria with structurally nanoengineered antimicrobial peptide polymers. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:16162. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Lv Y., Wang J., Gao H., Wang Z., Dong N., Ma Q., et al. Antimicrobial properties and membrane-active mechanism of a potential α-helical antimicrobial derived from cathelicidin PMAP-36. PLoS One. 2014;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Lee H., Hwang J., Lee J., Kim J., Lee D. Scolopendin 2, a cationic antimicrobial peptide from centipede, and its membrane-active mechanism. BBA. 2015;1848:634–642. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Anaya-López J., López-Meza J., Ochoa-Zarzosa A. Bacterial resistance to cationic antimicrobial peptides. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2013;39:180–195. doi: 10.3109/1040841x.2012.699025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Andersson D., Hughes D., Kubicek-Sutherland J. Mechanisms and consequences of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial peptides. Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy. 2016;26:43–57. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2016.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Bauer M., Shafer W. On the in vivo significance of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial peptides. BBA. 2015;1848:3101–3111. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Chang Y., Cesarman E., Pessin M., Lee F., Culpepper J., Knowles D., et al. Identification of herpesvirus-like DNA sequences in AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma. Science (New York. 1994;N.Y.) 266:1865–1869. doi: 10.1126/science.7997879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Moore P., Chang Y. Molecular virology of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001;356:499–516. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Verma S., Robertson E. Molecular biology and pathogenesis of Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003;222:155–163. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1097(03)00261-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Moore P., Chang Y. KSHV: forgotten but not gone. Blood. 2011;117:6973–6974. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-05-350306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Staudt M., Dittmer D. Viral latent proteins as targets for Kaposi's sarcoma and Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV/HHV-8) induced lymphoma. Curr Drug Targets Infect Disord. 2003;3:129–135. doi: 10.2174/1568005033481150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Akasbi Y., Awada A., Arifi S., Mellas N., El Mesbahi O. Non-HIV Kaposi's sarcoma: a review and therapeutic perspectives. Bull Cancer. 2012;99:92–99. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2012.1636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Herrington C., Douek D. Infection and disease: cause and cure. J Pathol. 2006;208:131–133. doi: 10.1002/path.1912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Henderson E., Hardin C., Walk S., Tinoco I., Blackburn E. Telomeric DNA oligonucleotides form novel intramolecular structures containing guanine-guanine base pairs. Cell. 1987;51:899–908. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90577-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Sen D., Gilbert W. Formation of parallel four-stranded complexes by guanine-rich motifs in DNA and its implications for meiosis. Nature. 1988;334:364–366. doi: 10.1038/334364a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Williamson J., Raghuraman M., Cech T. Monovalent cation-induced structure of telomeric DNA: the G-quartet model. Cell. 1989;59:871–880. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90610-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Sundquist W., Klug A. Telomeric DNA dimerizes by formation of guanine tetrads between hairpin loops. Nature. 1989;342:825–829. doi: 10.1038/342825a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Huppert J. Structure, location and interactions of G-quadruplexes. FEBS J. 2010;277:3452–3458. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07758.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Huppert J. Four-stranded nucleic acids: structure, function and targeting of G-quadruplexes. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37:1375–1384. doi: 10.1039/b702491f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Sarah B., Gary N., P., Pascale, H., Alan K, T. & Stephen, N. Quadruplex DNA: sequence, topology and structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Madireddy A., Purushothaman P., Loosbroock C., Robertson E., Schildkraut C., Verma S. G-quadruplex-interacting compounds alter latent DNA replication and episomal persistence of KSHV. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:3675–3694. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Yamanishi K., Okuno T., Shiraki K., Takahashi M., Kondo T., Asano Y., et al. Identification of human herpesvirus-6 as a causal agent for exanthem subitum. Lancet (London, England) 1988;1:1065–1067. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91893-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Tesini B., Epstein L., Caserta M. Clinical impact of primary infection with roseoloviruses. Curr Opin Virol. 2014;9:91–96. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2014.09.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Hill J., Zerr D. Roseoloviruses in transplant recipients: clinical consequences and prospects for treatment and prevention trials. Curr Opin Virol. 2014;9:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2014.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Campbell N., Parkinson G., Reszka A., Neidle S. Structural basis of DNA quadruplex recognition by an acridine drug. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:6722–6724. doi: 10.1021/ja8016973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Zhou G., Liu X., Li Y., Xu S., Ma C., Wu X., et al. Telomere targeting with a novel G-quadruplex-interactive ligand BRACO-19 induces T-loop disassembly and telomerase displacement in human glioblastoma cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7:14925–14939. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Gilbert-Girard S., Gravel A., Artusi S., Richter S., Wallaschek N., Kaufer B., et al. Stabilization of Telomere G-Quadruplexes Interferes with Human Herpesvirus 6A Chromosomal Integration. J Virol. 2017;91 doi: 10.1128/jvi.00402-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Diao W., Tang M., Ding S., Li X., Cheng W., Mo F., et al. Highly sensitive surface plasmon resonance biosensor for the detection of HIV-related DNA based on dynamic and structural DNA nanodevices. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;100:228–234. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.08.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Wang W., Lin M., Wang W., Shen Z., Wu Z. DNA tetrahedral nanostructures for the biomedical application and spatial orientation of biomolecules. Bioact Mater. 2024;33:279–310. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.10.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Rúben F., P. & Paulo J, B. Traditional Therapies for Skin Wound Healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2016;5 doi: 10.1089/wound.2013.0506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Yue L., Zheyan C., Yinai L., Jiawen W., Wang L., Renyi P. Recent advances in Nano-Formulations for Skin Wound Repair applications. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022;16 doi: 10.2147/dddt.S375541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Andrew J., B., Zane, A., Youbo, Z., Joanne, L., Eric J, C., Marina, M., Angela, H.-E. & Stephen A, B. Longitudinal in vivo tracking of adverse effects following topical steroid treatment. Exp Dermatol. 2016;25 doi: 10.1111/exd.12932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.McBurney E. Side effects and complications of laser therapy. Dermatol Clin. 2002;20:165–176. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8635(03)00054-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Abdul-Majeed R., A., Saja H, H., Fuad M, A.-D. & Amjad E, S. Short-term and long-term effects of electrical stimulation on skin properties. Physiother Res Int. 2012;18 doi: 10.1002/pri.1543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Glenn G., Vanessa L. Surgical treatment of large skin cancers. Facial Plast Surg. 2013;29 doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1353384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Ratchanee D., Anuttara U., Thaned K. Tetrahedral DNA nanostructures as drug delivery and bioimaging platforms in cancer therapy. Cancer Sci. 2020;111 doi: 10.1111/cas.14548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Christian W., Ying Z., Shiuan D.C., L., David C, Y., Mo, X., Weina, F., Qian, L., Mengjia, Z., Maurice, V. S., Lihua, W., Chunhai, F. & Chenjie, X. Framework nucleic acids as programmable carrier for transdermal drug delivery. Nat Commun. 2019;10 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09029-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Songhang L., Yuhao L., Tao Z., Shiyu L., Sirong S., Jiajun H., et al. A Tetrahedral Framework DNA-Based Bioswitchable miRNA Inhibitor delivery System: Application to Skin Anti-Aging. Adv Mater. 2022;34 doi: 10.1002/adma.202204287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Yikai D., Weitong C., Xiao Y., Yunfeng L., Xiaohong M., Xiaoxiao C. Applications of tetrahedral DNA nanostructures in wound repair and tissue regeneration. Burns Trauma. 2022;10 doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkac006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Shiyu L., Qi Z., Songhang L., Xin Q., Xiaoxiao C., Huiming W. Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids-based delivery promotes intracellular transfer of healing peptides and accelerates diabetic would healing. Cell Prolif. 2022;55 doi: 10.1111/cpr.13279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Vivek P., Klaudi K., V., Shikha, J., Dnyaneshwar, P., Mukta, A. & Amit, A. Overcoming skin barriers through advanced transdermal drug delivery approaches. J Control Release 351. 2022 doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Wang H., Gong J., Chen W., Sun Q., Zhang T., Lin Y., et al. Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids’ role in facilitating chronic diabetic wound repair via the endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondrial pathway. Nano Today. 2024;56 doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2024.102252. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Mengting L., Wenjuan M., Dan Z., Jiajie L., Qirong L., Yuhao L., et al. Enhanced Penetrability of a Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acid by Modification with iRGD for DOX-Targeted delivery to Triple-negative Breast Cancer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13 doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c07297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Juan L., Cheng-Yi H., Shu-Xian W., Hong L., Li-Ping W., Guoming H., et al. Facile phase transfer and Surface Biofunctionalization of Hydrophobic Nanoparticles using Janus DNA Tetrahedron Nanostructures. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137 doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b05650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Prashant K., Rahul C., Afsana S., Waleed Y., R. & Awaji Y, S. CD44-Targeted Nanocarrier for Cancer Therapy. Front Pharmacol. 2022;12 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.800481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Mamta K., Amitabha A., Praveen Thaggikuppe K. Antibody-conjugated nanoparticles for target-specific drug delivery of chemotherapeutics. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2023;14 doi: 10.3762/bjnano.14.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Chaoyang G., Xiaoli Z., Chang F. DNA Nanodevice-Based Drug Delivery Systems Biomolecules. 2021;11 doi: 10.3390/biom11121855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Xinhong L., Roel N. Wnt signaling in skin development, homeostasis, and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;5 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Jonghyeob L., Jacob M., B., Shadmehr, D. & Raphael, K. Bi-compartmental communication contributes to the opposite proliferative behavior of Notch1-deficient hair follicle and epidermal keratinocytes. Development 134. 2007 doi: 10.1242/dev.02868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.A a, r. & t a, s. Epidermal Growth factor Receptor: Key to Selective Intracellular delivery. Biochemistry (Mosc) 2020;85 doi: 10.1134/s0006297920090011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Yue H., Zhou C., He Z., Mingkai L., Zheng H., Xiaoxing L., et al. Development of DNA tetrahedron-based drug delivery system. Drug Deliv. 2017;24 doi: 10.1080/10717544.2017.1373166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Cai Q., Qiang S., Dexuan X., Mei Z., Shaojingya G., Bin G., et al. Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids/hyaluronic acid-methacrylic anhydride hybrid hydrogel with antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties for infected wound healing. Int J Oral Sci. 2024;16 doi: 10.1038/s41368-024-00290-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282.Wang L., Wang Y., Lu T., Luo C., Qiu B., Huang S., et al. Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acid Loaded miR‐23b Inhibits Synovial Inflammation and Cartilage Matrix Degradation in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Adv Funct Mater. 2023;34 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202310749. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Mengting L., Liying H., Dan Z., Jiajie L., Yunfeng L. Self-Assembled Immunostimulatory Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acid Vehicles for Tumor Chemo-immunotherapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14 doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c09462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Qin F., Zhihao L., Jue Y., Mo X., Meirong C., Chunhai F., et al. Inhalable pH-responsive DNA tetrahedron nanoplatform for boosting anti-tumor immune responses against metastatic lung cancer. Biomaterials. 2023;301 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Fengyun S., Lele S., Lihua W., Rui P., Chunhai F., Zhuang L. Framework Nucleic Acid Immune Adjuvant for Transdermal delivery based Chemo-immunotherapy for Malignant Melanoma Treatment. Nano Lett. 2022;22 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Xiaolin Z., Mei Z., Mi Z., Tao Z., Yang G., Songhang L., et al. Tetrahedral-Framework Nucleic Acids Carry Small Interfering RNA to Downregulate Toll-like Receptor 2 Gene Expression for the Treatment of Sepsis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14 doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c23708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Zhan Y., Zhang Y., Mao C., Li J., Zhao Y., Chen Y., et al. Improved Tumor Infiltration and Immunomodulation for Tumor Therapy: a Pathway based on Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acids coupled Bacterial Nanocells. Nano Lett. 2023;23:353–362. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c03943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Zhang M., Qin X., Gao Y., Liang J., Xiao D., Zhang X., et al. Transcutaneous Immunotherapy for RNAi: A Cascade-Responsive Decomposable Nanocomplex Based on Polyphenol-Mediated Framework Nucleic Acid in Psoriasis Advanced science. 2023;10 doi: 10.1002/advs.202303706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289.Wang L., Wang Y., Jiang Y., Chen M., Li Z., Wang K., et al. Tetrahedral Framework Nuclear Acids can Regulate Interleukin-17 Pathway to Alleviate Inflammation and Inhibit Heterotopic Ossification in Ankylosing Spondylitis. ACS Nano. 2023;17:24187–24199. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c09480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.Li J., Mao X., Zhao T., Fang W., Jin Y., Liu M., et al. Tetrahedral DNA Framework-based Spherical Nucleic Acids for Efficient siRNA delivery. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2025;64 doi: 10.1002/anie.202416988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291.Ge Y., Wang Q., Yao Y., Xin Q., Sun J., Chen W., et al. Framework Nucleic Acids-Based VEGF Signaling Activating System for Angiogenesis: A Dual Stimulation Strategy Advanced science. 2024;11 doi: 10.1002/advs.202308701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Lin S., Zhang Q., Li S., Zhang T., Wang L., Qin X., et al. Antioxidative and Angiogenesis-Promoting Effects of Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acids in Diabetic Wound Healing with Activation of the Akt/Nrf2/HO-1 Pathway. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:11397–11408. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c00874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress. Endocr Rev. 2004;25:581–611. doi: 10.1210/er.2003-0027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294.Junyao Z., Mei Z., Yang G., Xin Q., Tianxu Z., Weitong C., et al. Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids promote scarless healing of cutaneous wounds via the AKT-signaling pathway. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5 doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0173-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295.Yueying J., Songhang L., Ruijianghan S., Wumeng Y., Weitong L., Taoran T., et al. A Novel Bioswitchable miRNA Mimic delivery System: Therapeutic Strategies Upgraded from Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acid System for Fibrotic Disease Treatment and Pyroptosis Pathway Inhibition. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2023;11 doi: 10.1002/advs.202305622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296.Leonardi G., Falzone L., Salemi R., Zanghì A., Spandidos D., Mccubrey J., et al. Cutaneous melanoma: from pathogenesis to therapy (Review) Int J Oncol. 2018;52:1071–1080. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297.Long G., Swetter S., Menzies A., Gershenwald J., Scolyer R. Cutaneous melanoma. Lancet (London, England) 2023;402:485–502. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00821-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298.Tow R., Hanoun S., Andresen B., Shahid A., Wang J., Kelly K., et al. Recent advances in Clinical Research for Skin Cancer Chemoprevention. Cancers. 2023;15 doi: 10.3390/cancers15153819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299.Breitbart E., Choudhury K., Anders M., Volkmer B., Greinert R., Katalinic A., et al. Benefits and risks of skin cancer screening. Oncol Res Treat. 2014;38–47 doi: 10.1159/000364887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 300.Yu L., Moloney M., Tran A., Zheng S., Rogers J. Local control comparison of early-stage non-melanoma skin Cancer (NMSC) treated by superficial radiotherapy (SRT) and external beam radiotherapy (XRT) with and without dermal image guidance: a meta-analysis. Discov Oncol. 2022;13:129. doi: 10.1007/s12672-022-00593-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 301.Tchernev G., Nenoff P. Dissecting the pathways of tumour escape: “ question of life and death?”. An Bras Dermatol. 2010;85:248–259. doi: 10.1590/s0365-05962010000200022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 302.Ugurel S., Patel S. Editorial: Women in skin cancer vol II: 2022. Front Oncol. 2023;13 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1253081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 303.Tian A., Zhou A., Bi X., Hu S., Jiang Z., Zhang W., et al. Efficacy of Topical compound Danxiong Granules for Treatment of Dermatologic Toxicities Induced by Targeted Anticancer Therapy: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017;2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/3970601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 304.Kleszcz R. Advantages of the Combinatorial Molecular Targeted Therapy of Head and Neck Cancer-a step before Anakoinosis-based Personalized Treatment. Cancers. 2023;15 doi: 10.3390/cancers15174247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 305.Sabbah M., Najem A., Krayem M., Awada A., Journe F., Ghanem G. RTK Inhibitors in Melanoma: from Bench to Bedside. Cancers. 2021;13 doi: 10.3390/cancers13071685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 306.Qurat-Ul-Ain, Basu, A., Choudhary, M. & Scharffetter-Kochanek, K. 3, 3'- (3, 5-DCPBC) Down-Regulates Multiple Phosphokinase Dependent Signal Transduction Pathways in Malignant Melanoma Cells through Specific Diminution of EGFR Phosphorylation. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)27 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 307.Muraro E., Montico B., Lum B., Colizzi F., Giurato G., Salvati A., et al. Antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity-inducing anti-EGFR antibodies as effective therapeutic option for cutaneous melanoma resistant to BRAF inhibitors. Front Immunol. 2024;15 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1336566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 308.Massaguer, A., González-Cantó, A., Escribano, E., Barrabés, S., Artigas, G., Moreno, V. & Marchán, V. Integrin-targeted delivery into cancer cells of a Pt(IV) pro-drug through conjugation to RGD-containing peptides. Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003)44, 202-212 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4dt02710h. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 309.Safarkhani M., Ahmadi S., Ipakchi H., Saeb M., Makvandi P., Ebrahimi Warkiani M., et al. Advancements in Aptamer-Driven DNA Nanostructures for Precision Drug delivery. Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) 2024;11 doi: 10.1002/advs.202401617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 310.Sharma A., Vaswani P., Bhatia D. Revolutionizing cancer therapy using tetrahedral DNA nanostructures as intelligent drug delivery systems. Nanoscale Adv. 2024;6:3714–3732. doi: 10.1039/d4na00145a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 311.Abdelaal A., Kasinski A. Ligand-mediated delivery of RNAi-based therapeutics for the treatment of oncological diseases. NAR cancer. 2021;3 doi: 10.1093/narcan/zcab030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 312.Marvalim C., Datta A., Lee S. Role of p53 in breast cancer progression: an insight into p53 targeted therapy. Theranostics. 2023;13:1421–1442. doi: 10.7150/thno.81847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 313.Gervin C., McCulla A., Williams M., Ouhtit A. Dysfunction of p53 in photocarcinogenesis. Front Biosci. 2003;8:s715–s717. doi: 10.2741/1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 314.Li S., Tian T., Zhang T., Lin Y., Cai X. A bioswitchable delivery system for microRNA therapeutics based on a tetrahedral DNA nanostructure. Nat Protoc. 2025;20:336–362. doi: 10.1038/s41596-024-01050-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 315.Zhang Y., Wu B., Liu D., Chen Y., Xu Y., Fu L., et al. Targeting HIF-1α with specific DNA Yokes for Effective Anticancer Therapy. Adv Healthc Mater. 2024;13 doi: 10.1002/adhm.202401087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 316.Li W., Qunyan Y., Xuerui G., Bingmei W., Jingyi S., Xingye W., et al. Targeted delivery of CEBPA-saRNA for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by transferrin receptor aptamer decorated tetrahedral framework nucleic acid. J Nanobiotechnology. 2024;22 doi: 10.1186/s12951-024-02665-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 317.Qian H., Zhou T., Fu Y., Guo M., Yang W., Zhang D., et al. Self-assembled tetrahedral framework nucleic acid mediates tumor-associated macrophage reprogramming and restores antitumor immunity. Molecular therapy Nucleic acids. 2022;27:763–773. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2021.12.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 318.Yan J., Yu H., Liu C., Li B., Wei D., He B., et al. Low-temperature photothermal-chemotherapy enhancing tumor immunotherapy by tetrahedral framework nucleic acids nanogels based drug delivery system. Chem Eng J. 2024;481 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.148616. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 319.Liang S., Li J., Zou Z., Mao M., Ming S., Lin F., et al. viaTetrahedral DNA nanostructures synergize with MnO to enhance antitumor immunity promoting STING activation and M1 polarization. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022;12:2494–2505. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 320.Lee K., Chan K., Lee A., Lee C., Wan J., Wong S., et al. Polynucleotides in Aesthetic Medicine: a Review of Current Practices and Perceived Effectiveness. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25 doi: 10.3390/ijms25158224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 321.He X., Gao X., Guo Y., Xie W. Research Progress on Bioactive Factors against Skin Aging. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25 doi: 10.3390/ijms25073797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 322.Wei X., Xu H., Zhou M., Zhou Q., Li M., Liu Y. Chemically modified microRNA delivery via DNA tetrahedral frameworks for dental pulp regeneration. J Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22:150. doi: 10.1186/s12951-024-02393-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 323.Xu S., Wu W., Huang H., Huang R., Xie L., Su A., et al. The p53/miRNAs/Ccna2 pathway serves as a novel regulator of cellular senescence: Complement of the canonical p53/p21 pathway. Aging Cell. 2019;18 doi: 10.1111/acel.12918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 324.van Rooij E., Sutherland L., Thatcher J., DiMaio J., Naseem R., Marshall W., et al. Dysregulation of microRNAs after myocardial infarction reveals a role of miR-29 in cardiac fibrosis. PNAS. 2008;105:13027–13032. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805038105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 325.Mayer U., Benditz A., Grässel S. miR-29b regulates expression of collagens I and III in chondrogenically differentiating BMSC in an osteoarthritic environment. Sci Rep. 2017;7:13297. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13567-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 326.Miatmoko A., Ayunin Q., Soeratri W. Ultradeformable vesicles: concepts and applications relating to the delivery of skin cosmetics. Ther Deliv. 2021;12:739–756. doi: 10.4155/tde-2021-0044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 327.Zhang Y., Xia M., Jin K., Wang S., Wei H., Fan C., et al. Function of the c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase in carcinogenesis and associated therapeutic opportunities. Mol Cancer. 2018;17:45. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0796-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 328.Neuendorf H., Simmons J., Boyle G. Therapeutic targeting of anoikis resistance in cutaneous melanoma metastasis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023;11 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1183328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 329.Kaniowski D., Ebenryter-Olbińska K., Kulik K., Suwara J., Cypryk W., Jakóbik-Kolon A., et al. Composites of Nucleic Acids and Boron Clusters (CBH) as Functional Nanoparticles for Downregulation of EGFR Oncogene in Cancer Cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22 doi: 10.3390/ijms22094863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 330.Ming X., Laing B. Bioconjugates for targeted delivery of therapeutic oligonucleotides. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;87:81–89. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 331.Roy T., Boateng S., Uddin M., Banang-Mbeumi S., Yadav R., Bock C., et al. The PI3K-akt-mTOR and Associated Signaling Pathways as Molecular Drivers of Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Skin Diseases: Update on Therapeutic Strategy using Natural and Synthetic Compounds. Cells. 2023;12 doi: 10.3390/cells12121671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 332.Yang Q., Fang D., Chen J., Hu S., Chen N., Jiang J., et al. LncRNAs associated with oxidative stress in diabetic wound healing: Regulatory mechanisms and application prospects. Theranostics. 2023;13:3655–3674. doi: 10.7150/thno.85823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 333.He J., Chen W., Chen X., Xie Y., Zhao Y., Tian T., et al. Tetrahedral framework nucleic acid loaded with glabridin: a transdermal delivery system applicated to anti-hyperpigmentation. Cell Prolif. 2023;56 doi: 10.1111/cpr.13495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 334.Liu J. Natural products in cosmetics. Nat Prod Bioprospect. 2022;12:40. doi: 10.1007/s13659-022-00363-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 335.Ko H., Chang Y., Kuo Y., Lin C., Chen Y. Oenothera laciniata Hill Extracts Exhibits Antioxidant Effects and Attenuates Melanogenesis in B16–F10 Cells via Downregulating CREB/MITF/Tyrosinase and Upregulating p-ERK and p-JNK. 2021;10 doi: 10.3390/plants10040727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 336.Yan J., Zhan X., Zhang Z., Chen K., Wang M., Sun Y., et al. Tetrahedral DNA nanostructures for effective treatment of cancer: advances and prospects. J Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19:412. doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-01164-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 337.Sun M., Xu X., Lou X., Du Y. Recent Progress and Future Directions: the Nano-Drug delivery System for the Treatment of Vitiligo. Int J Nanomed. 2020;15:3267–3279. doi: 10.2147/ijn.S245326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 338.Cabaço L., Tomás A., Pojo M., Barral D. The Dark Side of Melanin Secretion in Cutaneous Melanoma Aggressiveness. Front Oncol. 2022;12 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.887366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 339.Yosipovitch G., Misery L., Proksch E., Metz M., Ständer S., Schmelz M. Skin Barrier damage and Itch: Review of Mechanisms, Topical Management and Future Directions. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019;99:1201–1209. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 340.Madison K. Barrier function of the skin: “la raison d'être” of the epidermis. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;121:231–241. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12359.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 341.Ryu S., Kim Y., Lee S., Hong J. The preventive effect of recombinant human growth factor (rhEGF) on the recurrence of radiodermatitis. J Radiat Res. 2010;51:511–517. doi: 10.1269/jrr.10010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 342.Qiang W., Zhou T., Lan X., Zhang X., Guo Y., Noman M., et al. A new nanoscale transdermal drug delivery system: oil body-linked oleosin-hEGF improves skin regeneration to accelerate wound healing. J Nanobiotechnol. 2018;16:62. doi: 10.1186/s12951-018-0387-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 343.Helou D., Martin S., Pallardy M., Chollet-Martin S., Kerdine-Römer S. Nrf2 Involvement in Chemical-Induced Skin Innate Immunity. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1004. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 344.Wenjuan M., Xiaoru S., Dan Z., Qianshun L., Mengting L., Tengfei Z., et al. Self-Assembled Tetrahedral DNA Nanostructures Promote Neural Stem Cell Proliferation and Neuronal Differentiation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10 doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b00833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 345.Mamun A., Shao C., Geng P., Wang S., Xiao J. Recent advances in molecular mechanisms of skin wound healing and its treatments. Front Immunol. 2024;15 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1395479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 346.Yang Y., Yang J., Zhu J., Chen X., Zhou L., Ma W., et al. A DNA tetrahedron-based nanosuit for efficient delivery of amifostine and multi-organ radioprotection. Bioact Mater. 2024;39:191–205. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 347.Zhao D., Xiao D., Liu M., Li J., Peng S., He Q., et al. Tetrahedral framework nucleic acid carrying angiogenic peptide prevents bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw by promoting angiogenesis. Int J Oral Sci. 2022;14:23. doi: 10.1038/s41368-022-00171-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 348.Petruk G., Del Giudice R., Rigano M., Monti D. Antioxidants from Plants Protect against Skin Photoaging. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018;2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/1454936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 349.Fu W., Ma L., Ju Y., Xu J., Li H., Shi S., et al. Therapeutic siCCR2 Loaded by Tetrahedral Framework DNA Nanorobotics in Therapy for Intracranial Hemorrhage. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202101435. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 350.Jianwei Z., Yuting Y., Wenjuan M., Yangyang W., Lihua C., Huan X., et al. Antiepilepticus Effects of Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acid via Inhibition of Gliosis-Induced Downregulation of Glutamine Synthetase and increased AMPAR Internalization in the Postsynaptic Membrane. Nano Lett. 2022;22 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c00025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 351.Nigel L., K. & Huseyin, M. Neural stem cells. J Pathol 197. 2002 doi: 10.1002/path.1189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 352.Chong W., Chang-Feng L., Jiang P., Cheng-Dong H., Yu W. Roles of neural stem cells in the repair of peripheral nerve injury. Neural Regen Res. 2018;12 doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.221171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 353.Akiko S., Ryohei M., Junichi I. The role of acetyltransferases for the temporal-specific accessibility of β-catenin to the myogenic gene locus. Sci Rep. 2018;8 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32888-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 354.Lichun Q., Xuan L., Yujie H., Jiaheng Z., Hao H., Wenming B., et al. Progress of Signaling Pathways, stress Pathways and Epigenetics in the Pathogenesis of Skeletal Fluorosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22 doi: 10.3390/ijms222111932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 355.Zejing W., Hao L., Tao T., Lei L., Bohan P., Jiqiu C., et al. Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids promote diabetic wound healing via the Wnt signalling pathway. Cell Prolif. 2022;55 doi: 10.1111/cpr.13316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 356.Oksana V., Philipp G., Jan W., Dominique K., Michael B. Mapping of Wnt-Frizzled interactions by multiplex CRISPR targeting of receptor gene families. FASEB J. 2017;31 doi: 10.1096/fj.201700144R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 357.Dan Z., Mengting L., Qianshun L., Xiaolin Z., Changyue X., Yunfeng L., et al. Tetrahedral DNA Nanostructure Promotes Endothelial Cell Proliferation, Migration, and Angiogenesis via Notch Signaling Pathway. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10 doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b16518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 358.Pooja T., Divyan A., C., Shashank Manohar, D., Matthew J, V. H., Fang, Q., John, M., Angie, R. & Iqbal, A. Generation of Functional Human Retinal Ganglion Cells with Target Specificity from Pluripotent Stem Cells by Chemically Defined Recapitulation of Developmental Mechanism. Stem Cells. 2016;35 doi: 10.1002/stem.2513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 359.Claudio G., Verdon T. Notching up neural stem cell homogeneity in homeostasis and disease. Front Neurosci. 2014;8 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 360.Stefano Z., Ernesto C. Notch Signaling and the Skeleton. Endocr Rev. 2016;37 doi: 10.1210/er.2016-1002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 361.Lijun L., Youqing D., Renshi X. Current potential therapeutics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front Neurol. 2024;15 doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1402962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 362.Lucia E., A.-P., Martha S, R.-C., Gabriel, C.-V., Mario, R.-S., Jorge, G.-M., Norma, M.-L., Rocio E, G.-C., Sonia, L. & Oscar, G.-P. Regulation of neural stem cell in the human SVZ by trophic and morphogenic factors. Curr Signal Transduct Ther 6. 2011 doi: 10.2174/157436211797483958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 363.Xingyu C., Ziang X., Yang G., Ye C., Wumeng Y., Zhiqiang L., et al. Framework Nucleic Acid-based Selective Cell Catcher for Endogenous Stem Cell Recruitment. Adv Mater. 2024;36 doi: 10.1002/adma.202406118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 364.Roland F., Hongjun S. Signaling mechanisms regulating adult neural stem cells and neurogenesis. BBA. 2012;1830 doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 365.Liwei F., Pinxue L., Junyao Z., Zhiyao L., Cangjian G., Hao L., et al. Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids promote the biological functions and related mechanism of synovium-derived mesenchymal stem cells and show improved articular cartilage regeneration activity in situ. Bioact Mater. 2021;9 doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.07.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 366.Zhou M., Zhang T., Zhang X., Zhang M., Gao S., Zhang T., et al. Effect of Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acids on Neurological Recovery via Ameliorating Apoptosis and Regulating the Activation and Polarization of Astrocytes in Ischemic Stroke. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14:37478–37492. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c10364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 367.Xiaoru S., Weitong C., Xueping X., Wenjuan M., Yuxi Z., Yunfeng L. Treatment of Alzheimer's disease with framework nucleic acids. Cell Prolif. 2020;53 doi: 10.1111/cpr.12787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 368.Pengchao S., Nan Z., Yafang T., Yanan Y., Xiao C., Yongxing Z. SL2B aptamer and folic acid dual-targeting DNA nanostructures for synergic biological effect with chemotherapy to combat colorectal cancer. Int J Nanomed. 2017;12 doi: 10.2147/ijn.S132929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 369.Weitong C., Zhiyong G., Xingyu C., Ran Y., Wenjuan M., Xiao Y., et al. Targeting modulation of intestinal flora through oral route by an antimicrobial nucleic acid-loaded exosome-like nanovesicles to improve Parkinson's disease. Sci Bull (Beijing) 2024;69 doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2024.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 370.Toby L. The nuclear factor NF-kappaB pathway in inflammation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;1 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 371.Barnes P.J., Adcock I.M. Transcription factors and asthma. Eur Respir J. 1998;12:221–234. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.12010221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 372.Sirong S., Wei F., Shiyu L., Taoran T., Songhang L., Xiaoru S., et al. Targeted and effective glioblastoma therapy via aptamer-modified tetrahedral framework nucleic acid-paclitaxel nanoconjugates that can pass the blood brain barrier. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2019;21 doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2019.102061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 373.Wang J., Xie N., Lu S., Xiao B., Ou Y., Li Q., et al. CpG and Rutin Co‐Loaded DNA Tetrahedra for Targeted Therapy of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Synergistic Hematoma Clearance and Neuroinflammation Inhibition. Adv Funct Mater. 2024;34 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202403469. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 374.Mi Z., Yuanlin T., Yifei L., Tianxu Z., Shunhao Z., Xiaoxiao C., et al. Framework Nucleic Acid-based and Neutrophil-based Nanoplatform Loading Baicalin with Targeted Drug delivery for Anti-Inflammation Treatment. ACS Nano. 2025;19 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c12917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 375.Yona L., Eric B., D., Yong, R., Wangchen, T., Duc, D., Measho, A., Joshna, G., Kiara, L., Jorge, T.-L., Jennifer, P., Andrea, I., Aya, E., Brenda D, M., Danny, R., Aditya, N., Kristy, D., Jose, T., Corey, M., Thomas, L., Farhana, A., Tariful, I., Jaishree, J., Cory C, F., Max, R., Srikant, R., David R, B., Nilüfer, E.-T., Jeffrey W, K., Frank L, H., Erik C B, J., Karen, M., Allan I, L., Stefan, P., Nicholas T, S. & Todd E, G. Integrative proteomics identifies a conserved Aβ amyloid responsome, novel plaque proteins, and pathology modifiers in Alzheimer's disease. Cell Rep Med 5. 2024 doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 376.Putri S.A., Anggadiredja K. Kajian Efektivitas, Toksisitas, dan Cost-Effectiveness Obat-Obatan Penyakit Alzheimer. Acta Pharmaceutica Indonesia. 2023;48:14–22. doi: 10.5614/api.v48i1.22224. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 377.Jinsha L., Joey Paolo T., Shams A.-A., Yun D., Sepideh A. Therapeutic advances in Diabetes, Autoimmune, and Neurological Diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22 doi: 10.3390/ijms22062805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 378.Dariusz Ś., Jacek B., Aida K., Marta K. Virtual Therapy with the NMDA Antagonist Memantine in Hippocampal Models of Moderate to Severe Alzheimer's Disease, in Silico Trials. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022;15 doi: 10.3390/ph15050546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 379.Christopher H., v. D., Chad J, S., Paul, A., Randall J, B., Christopher, C., Michelle, G., Michio, K., David, L., Larisa, R., Sharon, C., Lutz, F., Sadao, K., Marwan, S., Bruno, V., David, W., Shobha, D., Michael, I., Lynn D, K. & Takeshi, I. Lecanemab in Early Alzheimer's Disease. N Engl J Med 388. 2022 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212948. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 380.Mark A., M., Albert C, L., Cynthia, D. E., Alette M, W., Paul A, A., Scott W, A., Sergey, S., JonDavid, S., John R, S., Miroslaw, B., Liana G, A., Stephen P, S. & Daniel M, S. Donanemab in Early Alzheimer's Disease. N Engl J Med 384. 2021 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100708. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 381.Detlev B., Susan A., M. & Jonathan D, G. Homeostatic bioenergetic network regulation - a novel concept to avoid pharmacoresistance in epilepsy. Expert Opin Drug Discov 6. 2011 doi: 10.1517/17460441.2011.575777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 382.Shipei H., Liyao Z., Jinling L., Sijia L. Epilepsy Treatment and Diagnosis Enhanced by Current Nanomaterial Innovations: a Comprehensive Review. Mol Neurobiol. 2024;62 doi: 10.1007/s12035-024-04328-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 383.Ursula S., S., Mayadah, Y., Ryan, B., Joseph L, F., Bounmy, S. & Detlev, B. Transient use of a systemic adenosine kinase inhibitor attenuates epilepsy development in mice. Epilepsia. 2019;60 doi: 10.1111/epi.14674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 384.Jianwei Z., Wenqiao Q., Fan W., Yangyang W., Qiguang W., Wenjuan M., et al. Reactive A1 Astrocyte-Targeted Nucleic Acid Nanoantiepileptic Drug Downregulating Adenosine Kinase to rescue Endogenous Antiepileptic Pathway. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023;15 doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c03455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 385.Nuo L., Zhen-Zhen W., Ming Z., Yi Z., Nai-Hong C. Role of non-coding RNA in the pathogenesis of depression. Gene. 2019;735 doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.144276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 386.Seyed Hamidreza R.-M., Alireza E.-B., Sara S., Amir Mohammad M., Abbas M. MicroRNA-22: a Novel and Potent Biological Therapeutics in Neurological Disorders. Mol Neurobiol. 2022;59 doi: 10.1007/s12035-022-02769-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 387.Huixiao D., Benliang C., Xiuzhen H. MicroRNA‑22 alleviates inflammation in ischemic stroke via p38 MAPK pathways. Mol Med Rep. 2019;20 doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 388.Gi Soo Y., Jong Kook P., Chae Yeon L., Jae Hee J., Sang Ho Y., Hyeok Yil K., et al. MicroRNA-22 negatively regulates LPS-induced inflammatory responses by targeting HDAC6 in macrophages. BMB Rep. 2020;53 doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2020.53.4.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 389.Katelin F., H. & Karl, O. MicroRNA as therapeutic targets for treatment of depression. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 9. 2013 doi: 10.2147/ndt.S34811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 390.Yu Z., Zaijie W., Richard A., G. Progress in microRNA delivery. J Control Release 172. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 391.Yuling L., Xiao Y., Yue D., Yikai D., Weitong C., Jiajie L., et al. DNA Tetrahedra-based delivery of MicroRNA-22 to Reduce Depressive Symptoms in mice. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023;15 doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c03054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 392.Dev K., Sumita V. Drug-induced liver injury Clin Med (Lond) 2016;16 doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-6-s104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 393.Jamil S., Vivek L., Nikolaos P., Mark G. Acute Liver Injury due to Severe Epstein-Barr Virus Infection. ACG Case Rep J. 2020;7 doi: 10.14309/crj.0000000000000325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 394.Xiao Z., Zhicheng D., Hui F., Qiankun Y., Guili Y., Enzhuang P., et al. Scutellarin prevents acute alcohol-induced liver injury via inhibiting oxidative stress by regulating the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway and inhibiting inflammation by regulating the AKT, p38 MAPK/NF-κB pathways. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2023;24 doi: 10.1631/jzus.B2200612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 395.W, b. & j, w. Acute liver failure; clinical features and management. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;11 doi: 10.1097/00042737-199909000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 396.Nazli Begum O., Emre H., Fuat H., S. & Ahmet, G. A Comprehensive Review of the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Liver failure. J Clin Med. 2023;12 doi: 10.3390/jcm12237451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 397.Abdolamir A., Reyhaneh N.-M., Azadeh A., Giada S., Kostas P. Oxidative stress in Liver Pathophysiology and Disease. Antioxidants (Basel) 2023;12 doi: 10.3390/antiox12091653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 398.Sha L., Hor-Yue T., Ning W., Zhang-Jin Z., Lixing L., Chi-Woon W., et al. The Role of Oxidative stress and Antioxidants in Liver Diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16 doi: 10.3390/ijms161125942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 399.Lumin Z., Meena B., B. Role of Kupffer Cells in Driving Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis in HIV Infection. Front Immunol. 2020;11 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 400.Nidhi M., Narayan Prasad Y., Vineet Kumar R., Priyam S., Kuldeep Singh Y., Sanyog J., et al. Efficient hepatic delivery of drugs: novel strategies and their significance. Biomed Res Int. 2013 (2013). doi: 10.1155/2013/382184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 401.Chen Y., Shi S., Li B., Lan T., Yuan K., Yuan J., et al. Therapeutic Effects of Self-Assembled Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acids on Liver Regeneration in Acute Liver failure. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14:13136–13146. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c02523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 402.Schaub J., Huppert K., Kurial S., Hsu B., Cast A., Donnelly B., et al. novo formation of the biliary system by TGFβ-mediated hepatocyte transdifferentiation. Nature. 2018;557:247–251. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0075-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 403.Stanger B. Cellular homeostasis and repair in the mammalian liver. Annu Rev Physiol. 2015;77:179–200. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021113-170255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 404.Wei H., Li F., Xue T., Wang H., Ju E., Li M., et al. MicroRNA-122-functionalized DNA tetrahedron stimulate hepatic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells for acute liver failure therapy. Bioact Mater. 2023;28:50–60. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.04.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 405.Wei H., Xue T., Li F., Ju E., Wang H., Li M., et al. Framework nucleic Acid-MicroRNA mediated hepatic differentiation and functional hepatic spheroid development for treating acute liver failure. Bioact Mater. 2024;41:611–626. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.08.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 406.Zamani M., Alizadeh-Tabari S., Ajmera V., Singh S., Murad M., Loomba R. Global Prevalence of Advanced Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis in the General Population: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2024 doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 407.Sun Y., Zhou J., Wang L., Wu X., Chen Y., Piao H., et al. New classification of liver biopsy assessment for fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients before and after treatment. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD) 2017;65:1438–1450. doi: 10.1002/hep.29009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 408.Marti-Aguado D., Calleja J., Vilar-Gomez E., Iruzubieta P., Rodríguez-Duque J., Del Barrio M., et al. Low-to-moderate alcohol consumption is associated with increased fibrosis in individuals with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. J Hepatol. 2024;81:930–940. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.06.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 409.Kockerling D., Nathwani R., Forlano R., Manousou P., Mullish B., Dhar A. Current and future pharmacological therapies for managing cirrhosis and its complications. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:888–908. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i8.888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 410.Kim K., Kim J., Back J., Lee J., Ahn D. Cholesterol-Mediated Seeding of Protein Corona on DNA Nanostructures for Targeted delivery of Oligonucleotide Therapeutics to Treat Liver Fibrosis. ACS Nano. 2022;16:7331–7343. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c08508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 411.Tsochatzis E., Bosch J., Burroughs A. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet (London, England) 2014;383:1749–1761. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60121-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 412.Ginès P., Krag A., Abraldes J., Solà E., Fabrellas N., Kamath P. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet (London, England) 2021;398:1359–1376. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01374-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 413.Tian T., Zhao C., Li S., Huang Z., Guo Y., Dai W., et al. Liver-Targeted delivery of Small Interfering RNA of C-C Chemokine Receptor 2 with Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acid Attenuates Liver Cirrhosis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023;15:10492–10505. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c22579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 414.Swartling, O., Evans, M., Larsson, P., Gilg, S., Holmberg, M., Klevebro, F., Löhr, M., Sparrelid, E. & Ghorbani, P. Risk factors for acute kidney injury after pancreatoduodenectomy, and association with postoperative complications and death. Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]23, 227-233 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2023.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 415.Perazella M., Rosner M. Drug-Induced Acute Kidney Injury. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2022;17:1220–1233. doi: 10.2215/cjn.11290821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 416.Penev Y., Ruppert M., Bilgili A., Li Y., Habib R., Dozic A., et al. Intraoperative hypotension and postoperative acute kidney injury: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2024;232:45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 417.Bellomo R., Kellum J., Ronco C. Acute kidney injury. Lancet (London, England) 2012;380:756–766. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61454-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 418.Ding F., Zhang S., Liu S., Feng J., Li J., Li Q., et al. Molecular Visualization of Early-Stage Acute Kidney Injury with a DNA Framework Nanodevice Advanced science. 2022;9 doi: 10.1002/advs.202105947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 419.Zhao M., Wang Y., Li L., Liu S., Wang C., Yuan Y., et al. Mitochondrial ROS promote mitochondrial dysfunction and inflammation in ischemic acute kidney injury by disrupting TFAM-mediated mtDNA maintenance. Theranostics. 2021;11:1845–1863. doi: 10.7150/thno.50905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 420.Zhang Q., Lin S., Wang L., Peng S., Tian T., Li S., et al. Tetrahedral framework nucleic acids act as antioxidants in acute kidney injury treatment. Chem Eng J. 2021;413 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127426. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 421.Hamroun A., Lenain R., Bigna J.J., Speyer E., Bui L., Chamley P., et al. Prevention of Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Drugs. 2019;79:1567–1582. doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-01182-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 422.Pizzino G., Irrera N., Cucinotta M., Pallio G., Mannino F., Arcoraci V., et al. Oxidative stress: Harms and Benefits for Human Health. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/8416763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 423.Schumacker P. Reactive oxygen species in cancer cells: live by the sword, die by the sword. Cancer Cell. 2006;10:175–176. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 424.Petrov D., Daura X., Zagrovic B. Effect of Oxidative damage on the Stability and Dimerization of Superoxide Dismutase 1. Biophys J. 2016;110:1499–1509. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.02.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 425.Ran Y., Weitong C., Wenjuan M., Jiajie L., Zhiqiang L., Yunfeng L. Typhaneoside-Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acids System: Mitochondrial Recovery and Antioxidation for Acute Kidney Injury treatment. ACS Nano. 2023;17 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c02102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 426.Chen X., Wu H., Li P., Peng W., Wang Y., Zhang X., et al. Unraveling the Mechanism of Xiaochaihu Granules in Alleviating Yeast-Induced fever based on Network Analysis and Experimental Validation. Pharmaceuticals. 2024;17 doi: 10.3390/ph17040475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 427.Yuanchong C., Jiangshan X., Sirong S., Wenjuan M., Weitong C., Ran Y., et al. A DNA nanostructure-Hif-1α inducer complex as novel nanotherapy against cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury. Cell Prolif. 2024;57 doi: 10.1111/cpr.13601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 428.Huang L., Chen W., Tan Z., Huang Y., Gu X., Liu L., et al. viaMrc1 macrophage-derived IGF1 mitigates crystal nephropathy by promoting renal tubule cell proliferation the AKT/Rb signaling pathway. Theranostics. 2024;14:1764–1780. doi: 10.7150/thno.89174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 429.Zhong X., Tang T., Shen A., Cao J., Jing J., Wang C., et al. Tubular epithelial cells-derived small extracellular vesicle-VEGF-A promotes peritubular capillary repair in ischemic kidney injury. npj Regener Med. 2022;7:73. doi: 10.1038/s41536-022-00268-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 430.Thai H., Kim K., Hong K., Voitsitskyi T., Lee J., Mao C., et al. Kidney-Targeted Cytosolic delivery of siRNA using a Small-Sized Mirror DNA Tetrahedron for Enhanced Potency. ACS Cent Sci. 2020;6:2250–2258. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 431.Juan S., Fubing W., Hongping X., Yafeng W., Songqin L. Accurate cancer cell identification and microRNA silencing induced therapy using tailored DNA tetrahedron nanostructures. Chem Sci. 2020;11 doi: 10.1039/c9sc04823e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 432.Ginsburg O., Bray F., Coleman M.P., Vanderpuye V., Eniu A., Kotha S.R., et al. The global burden of women’s cancers: a grand challenge in global health. Lancet. 2017;389:847–860. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31392-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 433.Emma N., Geoffrey J., L. & Jane E, V. Deciphering breast cancer: from biology to the clinic. Cell 186. 2023 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 434.Loibl S., Poortmans P., Morrow M., Denkert C., Curigliano G. Breast cancer. Lancet. 2021;397:1750–1769. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32381-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 435.Mateusz K., Adrianna G., Somdutt M., Damian K., Żaneta K.-K., Ismail C., et al. Doxorubicin-an Agent with Multiple Mechanisms of Anticancer activity. Cells. 2023;12 doi: 10.3390/cells12040659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 436.Yutong L., Ling Z., Zitai M., Li T., Yingchi L., Yuqing L., et al. Ascorbate promotes the cellular accumulation of doxorubicin and reverses the multidrug resistance in breast cancer cells by inducing ROS-dependent ATP depletion. Free Radic Res. 2019;53 doi: 10.1080/10715762.2019.1628957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 437.Rajwar A., Shetty S.R., Vaswani P., Morya V., Barai A., Sen S., et al. Geometry of a DNA Nanostructure Influences its Endocytosis: Cellular Study on 2D, 3D, and in Vivo Systems. ACS Nano. 2022;16:10496–10508. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.2c01382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 438.Oktay T., Pornsak S., Crispin R., D. Doxorubicin: an update on anticancer molecular action, toxicity and novel drug delivery systems. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2013;65 doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2012.01567.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 439.Vaswani P., Naveena A., H., Kansara, K., Dahle, L., Kumar, A. & Bhatia, D. DNA tetrahedron as a carrier of doxorubicin for metastatic breast cancer treatment. ChemistrySelect 9. 2024 doi: 10.1002/slct.202305222. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 440.Yuxi W., Yamei Y., Guo-Bo L., Shu-Ang L., Chengyong W., Benoît G., et al. Mechanism of microtubule stabilization by taccalonolide AJ. Nat Commun. 2017;8 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 441.John Y., L., Samuel R, P., Vanessa, M.-M., Xinzhong, W., Leslie K, W., Marlon C, R., Mary Jane Masson, H., Binyam Z, B., Ryan L, F., Nazzareno, D., Hui, F., Dorin, T., Andy Q, Y., Lan, X., Jia, L., Changshou, G., Herren, W., Rakesh, D., Jane K, O. & Steven R, C. A Biparatopic HER2-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate Induces Tumor Regression in Primary Models Refractory to or Ineligible for HER2-Targeted Therapy. Cancer Cell. 2016;29 doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 442.Wenjing X., Yongbo P., Zhengyu D., Tianhuan P., Hailan K., Yingying L., et al. A basic insight into aptamer-drug conjugates (ApDCs) Biomaterials. 2018;182 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 443.Saikat G., Ankit J., Saritha S., Denish B., Kuntal M., Shubhadeep B., et al. Triple negative breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical challenges and nano-formulation approaches. J Control Release. 2021;337 doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 444.Lewis Phillips G.D., Li G., Dugger D.L., Crocker L.M., Parsons K.L., Mai E., et al. Targeting HER2-positive Breast Cancer with Trastuzumab-DM1, an Antibody–Cytotoxic Drug Conjugate. Cancer Res. 2008;68:9280–9290. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-08-1776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 445.Wenjuan M., Yuting Y., Jianwei Z., Weiqiang J., Tao Z., Zhiqiang L., et al. Biomimetic Nanoerythrosome-Coated Aptamer-DNA Tetrahedron/Maytansine Conjugates: pH-responsive and Targeted Cytotoxicity for HER2-positive Breast Cancer. Adv Mater. 2022;34 doi: 10.1002/adma.202109609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 446.Roger S., Warren P., M., Martin J, v. d. B., Michael, W., Barbara, F., Martin J B, T., Karl, B., Alba A, B., Christine, M., Ulrich, B., Jürgen, C., Robert C, J., Samuel K, L., Thierry, G., Anouk, A., Denis, L., J Gregory, C., Elizabeth, E. & René O, M. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352. 2005 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 447.Mary H., Aaron H., G., Daniel J, K., Michael J, J., Ana, N., Kiran, N., Mehdi, Z., Jennifer, K., Katrina, E., Ngoc Ha, D., Florence M G, C., Michelle M, K., Fiona J, C., Yuankun, Z., Betty, L., Yussanne, M., Andrew J, M., Richard, M., Marco A, M., Michael D, T., Trevor J, P., Peter B, D., Douglas, S., Lucie, L.-C., Adam C, R., Stephen, S., Donna L, S., Benjamin D, S., Jennifer A, C., A Sorana, M. & Marco, G. Intratumoral Genetic and Functional Heterogeneity in Pediatric Glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 2019;79 doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-18-3441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 448.Saran K., Husni S., Tirzah K., Maxim M., Libat B.-L., Myriam G., et al. Intra-Tumoral Metabolic Zonation and Resultant Phenotypic diversification are Dictated by Blood Vessel Proximity. Cell Metab. 2019;30 doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 449.Wang L., Javier M.L., Luo C., Lu T., Yao S., Qiu B., et al. Research advances of tetrahedral framework nucleic acid-based systems in biomedicine. Chin Chem Lett. 2024;35 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109591. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 450.W p, r., l f z, b., s c, n., w, w., m, w., c f m, m. & b, k. Apoptosis in malignant glioma cells triggered by the temozolomide-induced DNA lesion O6-methylguanine. Oncogene. 2006;26 doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 451.W, g., e, p., r, d., h, a. & a j, t. Temozolomide induces apoptosis and senescence in glioma cells cultured as multicellular spheroids. Br J Cancer. 2003;88 doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 452.Anna V., K., Wynand P, R., Teodora, N., Steve, Q., Karl-Heinz, T., Markus, C. & Bernd, K. Survival and death strategies in glioma cells: autophagy, senescence and apoptosis triggered by a single type of temozolomide-induced DNA damage. PLoS One 8. 2013 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 453.David S., H., Bryan G, H., Alison, R., Sen, P., Jonathan E, H., Teklu, L., Anthony J, K., Graeme F, W., Nhan L, T. & Jeffrey A, W. The TNF receptor family member Fn14 is highly expressed in recurrent glioblastoma and in GBM patient-derived xenografts with acquired temozolomide resistance. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20 doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 454.Xiaoyue C., Minjie Z., Haiyun G., Heping W., Jeong-Heon L., Dong F., et al. A novel enhancer regulates MGMT expression and promotes temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma. Nat Commun 9. 2018 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05373-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 455.Emilie L.R., Caroline, v. A., Birthe, L., Manuela, S., Hannah, S., Kristan, M., Emese, S. & Michael, W. Profound, durable and MGMT-independent sensitivity of glioblastoma cells to cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition. Int J Cancer 145. 2018 doi: 10.1002/ijc.32069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 456.Er N., Faan M., Xin J., Weining W., Xu Z., Ailiang Z., et al. Fstl1/DIP2A/MGMT signaling pathway plays important roles in temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma. Oncogene. 2018;38 doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0596-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 457.Wolfgang W., Susan D., Anne B., Tobias K., Irini K.-S., Antje W., et al. N2M2 (NOA-20) phase I/II trial of molecularly matched targeted therapies plus radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed non-MGMT hypermethylated glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2018;21 doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 458.Alireza M., Laureen D., H., Sheila, M., Farshad, N., Normand J, L., Daniel, X., Neal I, L., Patrick Y, W., Arnab, C., Minesh P, M., Monika E, H., Roger, S., Kenneth D, A. & Gelareh, Z. MGMT promoter methylation status testing to guide therapy for glioblastoma: refining the approach based on emerging evidence and current challenges. Neuro Oncol. 2018;21 doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 459.Tobias K., Felix S., Ahmed S., Damian S., Anne H., Guido R., et al. Molecular differences in IDH wildtype glioblastoma according to MGMT promoter methylation. Neuro Oncol. 2017;20 doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 460.Wei F., Chao Y., Lu M., Hao L., Yan J., Xi G., et al. Enhanced Efficacy of Temozolomide Loaded by a Tetrahedral Framework DNA Nanoparticle in the Therapy for Glioblastoma. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11 doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b13829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 461.Simona C., Carla L., E., Anna, R., Silvia, C., Margherita, I., Gerolama, C., Vittorio, d. F. & Laura, C. Inhibition of receptor signaling and of glioblastoma-derived tumor growth by a novel PDGFRβ aptamer. Mol Ther. 2014;22 doi: 10.1038/mt.2013.300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 462.Carla L., E., Silvia, N., Swati A, K., Anna, R., Clare L, L., Roberto, P., Lisa, S., Jane E, A., Lucia, R.-V., Silvia, C. & Vittorio, d. F. A combined microRNA-based targeted therapeutic approach to eradicate glioblastoma stem-like cells. J Control Release 238. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 463.Ilaria M., Simona C., David C., Erica L., Pierpaolo C., Anais O., et al. Aptamer Functionalization of Nanosystems for Glioblastoma Targeting through the Blood-Brain Barrier. J Med Chem. 2017;60 doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 464.Huey Minn T., Zhengyuan Z., Mohammad N., Siti R., Y., N Joan, A. & Antony, D. E. Delivery of paclitaxel across cellular barriers using a dendrimer-based nanocarrier. Int J Pharm 441. 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.10.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 465.Zimiao L., Zhiqiang Y., Kai J., Qiang P., Ting J., Heng L., et al. Precise glioblastoma targeting by AS1411 aptamer-functionalized poly (l-γ-glutamylglutamine)-paclitaxel nanoconjugates. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2016;490 doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 466.Yanzuo C., Shu F., Wenchao L., Zeting Y., Peihao Y., Feng G. Vitamin E Succinate-Grafted-Chitosan Oligosaccharide/RGD-Conjugated TPGS mixed Micelles Loaded with Paclitaxel for U87MG Tumor Therapy. Mol Pharm. 2017;14 doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b01068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 467.Xinyi J., Hongliang X., Xianyi S., Jijin G., Ye J., Kitki L., et al. PEGylated poly(trimethylene carbonate) nanoparticles loaded with paclitaxel for the treatment of advanced glioma: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int J Pharm. 2011;420 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.08.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 468.Sogawa K., Takano S., Iida F., Satoh M., Tsuchida S., Kawashima Y., et al. Identification of a novel serum biomarker for pancreatic cancer, C4b-binding protein α-chain (C4BPA) by quantitative proteomic analysis using tandem mass tags. Br J Cancer. 2016;115:949–956. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 469.A r, l. & p j, c. A tumor suppressor role for C/EBPα in solid tumors: more than fat and blood. Oncogene. 2017;36 doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 470.T, p., b u, m., p, z., h s, r., s, n., s, s., g, b., w, h. & d g, t. Dominant-negative mutations of CEBPA, encoding CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-alpha (C/EBPalpha), in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Genet. 2001;27 doi: 10.1038/85820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 471.Vikash R., Kai-Wen H., Vivian L., Sheba J., Pedro C., Stephanie D., et al. Gene activation of CEBPA using saRNA: preclinical studies of the first in human saRNA drug candidate for liver cancer. Oncogene. 2018;37 doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0126-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 472.Sorah Y., John J., R. Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer by Aptamer Conjugated C/EBPα-saRNA. Adv Exp Med Biol 983. 2017 doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-4310-9_12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 473.Sorah Y., Kai-Wen H., Vikash R., Paul M., Yu-Wen T., Hong-Shiee L., et al. Targeted delivery of C/EBPα -saRNA by Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma-specific RNA Aptamers Inhibits Tumor Growth In Vivo. Mol Ther. 2016;24 doi: 10.1038/mt.2016.60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 474.Bethany A., J., Scott T, Y., Daniel B, H., Rosalyn, R., Kenneth E, H. & David R, C. Activating gene expression in mammalian cells with promoter-targeted duplex RNAs. Nat Chem Biol 3. 2007 doi: 10.1038/nchembio860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 475.Long-Cheng L., Steven T., O., Hong, Z., Deepa, P., Robert F, P., Shinji, U., Hideki, E. & Rajvir, D. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A103. 2006. Small dsRNAs induce transcriptional activation in human cells. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 476.Lin Z., Lu W., Jinfeng G., Hao Z. RNA activation: promise as a new weapon against cancer. Cancer Lett. 2014;355 doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 477.Showkat Ahmad D., Manoj K. saRNAdb: Resource of Small Activating RNAs for Up-regulating the Gene Expression. J Mol Biol 430. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 478.Sorah Y., Kai-Wen H., Pinelopi A., Daniel V., Piotr S., Vikash R., et al. Targeted delivery of C/EBPα-saRNA by RNA Aptamers shows Anti-tumor Effects in a Mouse Model of Advanced PDAC. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2019;18 doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 479.Max M., Yves H. Drug Insight: panitumumab, a human EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibody with promising clinical activity in colorectal cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2008;5 doi: 10.1038/ncponc1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 480.Masahiro S. In vivo, in vitro and ex vivo models to assess pulmonary absorption and disposition of inhaled therapeutics for systemic delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006;58 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 481.Taylor Sitarik C., Alice P. Cystic fibrosis: a mucosal immunodeficiency syndrome. Nat Med. 2012;18 doi: 10.1038/nm.2715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 482.Alice C., Marianna M., K., Simone, N., Ian A, P. & Maartje M C, B. Spatially Controlled Activation of Toll-like Receptor 9 with DNA-Based Nanomaterials. Nano Lett. 2022;22 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c00275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 483.Jianbing L., Linlin S., Shaoli L., Shuai Z., Qiao J., Baoquan D. A Tailored DNA Nanoplatform for Synergistic RNAi-/Chemotherapy of Multidrug-Resistant Tumors. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018;57 doi: 10.1002/anie.201809452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 484.Guizhi Z., Lei M., Harshad D., V., Orit, J., Zhantong, W., Yijing, L., Bryant C, Y., Xiao, F., Albert, J., Gang, N., Qin, W., Fuwu, Z., Hari, S. & Xiaoyuan, C. Intertwining DNA-RNA nanocapsules loaded with tumor neoantigens as synergistic nanovaccines for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Commun 8. 2017 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01386-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 485.Danping W., Qifeng C., Meijun Q., Zhaoqun X., Minghui Z., Songbo D. MicroRNA-616 promotes the growth and metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer by targeting SOX7. Oncol Rep. 2017;38 doi: 10.3892/or.2017.5854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 486.Stephan F., Björn B., David S., M., Martina, S., Martina, F., Thilo, S., Günther, B., Claudia, G., Lothar, F., Harald, G., Armin, B. & Gert, F. Transport of paclitaxel (Taxol) across the blood-brain barrier in vitro and in vivo. J Clin Invest 110. 2002 doi: 10.1172/jci15451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 487.Michael M., G., Tito, F. & Susan E, B. Multidrug resistance in cancer: role of ATP-dependent transporters. Nat Rev Cancer 2. 2002 doi: 10.1038/nrc706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 488.Yichen G., Taoran T., Xiaoru S., Shiyu L., Tao Z., Yunfeng L., et al. PEGylated Protamine-based Adsorbing Improves the Biological Properties and Stability of Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acids. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11 doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b09243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 489.H p, v. & f, e. Incorporation of phosphorothioate groups into fd and phi X174 DNA. Biochemistry. 1977;16 doi: 10.1021/bi00635a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 490.J r, s., d b, o. & f, e. Inhibition of restriction endonuclease hydrolysis by phosphorothioate-containing DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17 doi: 10.1093/nar/17.22.9495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 491.Haran G., Cohen R., Bar L.K., Barenholz Y. Transmembrane ammonium sulfate gradients in liposomes produce efficient and stable entrapment of amphipathic weak bases. BBA. 1993;1151:201–215. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(93)90105-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 492.Hongming D., Jiang L., Nan C., Xingjie H., Xiafeng Y., Linjie G., et al. DNA Nanostructure-Programmed Like-Charge Attraction at the Cell-Membrane Interface. ACS Cent Sci. 2018;4 doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 493.Yang G., Xingyu C., Taoran T., Tao Z., Shaojingya G., Xiaolin Z., et al. A Lysosome-Activated Tetrahedral Nanobox for Encapsulated siRNA delivery. Adv Mater. 2022;34 doi: 10.1002/adma.202201731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 494.Idili A., Ricci F. Design and Characterization of pH-triggered DNA Nanoswitches and Nanodevices based on DNA Triplex Structures. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1811:79–100. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8582-1_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 495.Lin Y., Li Q., Wang L., Guo Q., Liu S., Zhu S., et al. Advances in regenerative medicine applications of tetrahedral framework nucleic acid-based nanomaterials: an expert consensus recommendation. Int J Oral Sci. 2022;14:51. doi: 10.1038/s41368-022-00199-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 496.Seaim Lwin A., Yusuke S. Therapeutic applications of Programmable DNA Nanostructures. Micromachines (Basel) 2022;13 doi: 10.3390/mi13020315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 497.Chenguang W., Yi X., Shuainan L., Yi Z., Qiuling Q., Yifan L., et al. Designer tetrahedral DNA framework-based microfluidic technology for multivalent capture and release of circulating tumor cells. Mater Today Bio. 2022;16 doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 498.Zhihe Q., Jinlei H., Jingyuan X., Zhen Z., Yanli L., Taiping Q., et al. An intramolecular catalytic hairpin assembly on a DNA tetrahedron for mRNA imaging in living cells: improving reaction kinetics and signal stability. Chem Sci. 2019;11 doi: 10.1039/c9sc04916a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 499.Patrick F., C., Olga, E., Jordan J, W., Jamie S T, S., Julian, S., Klaudia, E., Oliver G A, H., Christopher J, L., Sarah A, A., James H R, T., James P, H. & Joseph S, V. Solid-phase synthesis and structural characterisation of phosphoroselenolate-modified DNA: a backbone analogue which does not impose conformational bias and facilitates SAD X-ray crystallography. Chem Sci. 2020;10 doi: 10.1039/c9sc04098f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 500.Sanjay K., Ramesh S., Dhiraj B. Structural DNA nanotechnology at the nexus of next-generation bio-applications: challenges and perspectives. Nanoscale Adv. 2024;6 doi: 10.1039/d3na00692a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 501.Desai N. Challenges in development of nanoparticle-based therapeutics. AAPS J. 2012;14:282–295. doi: 10.1208/s12248-012-9339-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 502.Hare J.I., Lammers T., Ashford M.B., Puri S., Storm G., Barry S.T. Challenges and strategies in anti-cancer nanomedicine development: an industry perspective. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017;108:25–38. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 503.Anselmo A.C., Mitragotri S. Nanoparticles in the clinic. Bioeng Transl Med. 2016;1:10–29. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 504.Agrahari V., Hiremath P. Challenges associated and approaches for successful translation of nanomedicines into commercial products. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2017;12:819–823. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2017-0039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 505.Agrahari V., Agrahari V. Facilitating the translation of nanomedicines to a clinical product: challenges and opportunities. Drug Discov Today. 2018;23:974–991. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 506.Kaur I.P., Kakkar V., Deol P.K., Yadav M., Singh M., Sharma I. Issues and concerns in nanotech product development and its commercialization. J Control Release. 2014;193:51–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 507.Choi S.W., Kim W.S., Kim J.H. Surface Modification of Functional Nanoparticles for Controlled Drug delivery. J Dispers Sci Technol. 2007;24:475–487. doi: 10.1081/dis-120021803. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 508.Ly P.-D., Ly K.-N., Phan H.-L., Nguyen H.H.T., Duong V.-A., Nguyen H.V. Recent advances in surface decoration of nanoparticles in drug delivery. Front Nanotechnol. 2024;6 doi: 10.3389/fnano.2024.1456939. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 509.Ruirui Z., Yunfeng B., Yujing G., Feng F., Shaomin S. Aptamer-Modified Tetrahedral DNA Nanostructures as Drug delivery System for Cancer Targeted Therapy. Macromol Biosci. 2023;24 doi: 10.1002/mabi.202300420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Advanced Research are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES