Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropharmacology. 2026 Jun 13;298:111078. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2026.111078

Disruption of dopamine transmission by cholesterol depletion is associated with alterations in protein lipid raft partitioning and actin dynamics

Anna I Neel a, Evelyn T Lee a, Alyssa M West a, Monica H Dawes a, Rebekah D Schlitzer a, Reid A Suddaby a, Glen S Marrs b, Sara R Jones a, Rong Chen a,*
PMCID: PMC13316772  NIHMSID: NIHMS2190795  PMID: 42288194

Abstract

Disrupted brain cholesterol homeostasis is implicated in neurological disorders involving aberrant dopamine (DA) signaling; however, the direct effects of cholesterol on DA transmission in native tissue have not yet been demonstrated. Using ex vivo fast-scan cyclic voltammetry in nucleus accumbens slices from male rats, we found that membrane cholesterol depletion with methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD,3–10 mM) significantly reduced evoked DA release and decreased the apparent maximal rate of DA reuptake via the dopamine transporter (DAT). Because cholesterol is critical for the formation of lipid raft microdomains, cholesterol depletion could disrupt DA transmission by altering the membrane localization of proteins involved in neurotransmitter release. Using sucrose density gradient fractionation, we found that MβCD decreased the raft association of vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 (VAMP2) without altering the localization of syntaxin-1A, synaptosomal-associated protein 25, synaptotagmin-1, and N-type voltage-gated calcium channels. Therefore, MβCD may reduce DA release by disrupting localization of VAMP2, a core component of the vesicle fusion machinery. We also examined actin polymerization, a key regulator of vesicle docking and fusion, and found that MβCD treatment decreased actin polymerization, as evidenced by an increased globular-to-filamentous actin ratio and reduced phalloidin labeling of filamentous actin in striatal slices. Finally, although DAT lipid raft localization was unchanged, MβCD attenuated cocaine’s ability to inhibit DAT reuptake function, suggesting that cholesterol depletion disrupts the outward-facing conformation of DAT required for high-affinity ligand binding. Overall, these findings provide new mechanistic insights into how cholesterol depletion may contribute to dysregulated DA signaling in diseases involving altered brain cholesterol metabolism.

Keywords: Cholesterol, Dopamine transporter, Dopamine reuptake, Dopamine release, Lipid rafts, Actin polymerization

1. Introduction

Emerging evidence has implicated altered brain cholesterol metabolism in several neurological disorders involving disrupted dopamine (DA) signaling, including Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, schizophrenia, and substance use disorder (Alsebaaly et al., 2018; Block et al., 2010; Huang et al., 2019; Inabinett et al., 2025; Kreilaus et al., 2016). Cholesterol is a major structural component of neuronal membranes and is an important regulator of neurotransmission. Although the brain accounts for only 2% of total body mass, it contains nearly 23% of the body’s cholesterol content (Dietschy, 2009). Because cholesterol does not cross the blood-brain barrier, the brain relies on tightly regulated de novo synthesis to maintain cholesterol homeostasis (Vitali et al., 2014). In the brain, cholesterol is primarily, if not exclusively, present in its free, unesterified form (Björkhem and Meaney, 2004), in contrast to peripheral tissue, where cholesterol is mainly stored and transported as cholesteryl esters. Approximately 80% of brain cholesterol is found in myelin sheaths, with a slow turnover rate of approximately 0.4% per day (Dietschy and Turley, 2001). The remaining cholesterol is localized within cell membranes, where turnover is nearly 30% per day, suggesting that membrane cholesterol is dynamic and subject to regulation (Björkhem and Meaney, 2004; Dietschy, 2009; Dietschy and Turley, 2001). Notably, cholesterol is not evenly distributed on the cell membrane. This heterogeneity gives rise to specialized membrane regions with distinct structural and functional properties, including lipid raft and non-raft microdomains. Lipid raft microdomains are enriched in cholesterol and sphingolipids, which allow for the assembly and organization of membrane proteins and signaling molecules that facilitate efficient signal transduction (Sapoń et al., 2023; Warda et al., 2025). Specifically, lipid raft microdomains promote the assembly of proteins involved in vesicle fusion, neurotransmitter release, and membrane transport (Korade and Kenworthy, 2008; Lang et al., 2001; Orth and Bellosta, 2012). Given its critical role at the membrane, disruption of cholesterol homeostasis could therefore alter the presynaptic mechanisms that regulate DA signaling.

DA transmission depends on two tightly coordinated processes: vesicular DA release and dopamine transporter (DAT)-mediated DA reuptake. DA release is triggered by presynaptic calcium (Ca2+) influx, primarily through N-type channels such as CaV2.2 (Bergquist et al., 1998; Phillips and Stamford, 2000; Robinson et al., 2010). Ca2+ binding to synaptotagmin-1 triggers assembly of the canonical SNARE complex, consisting of the v-SNARE vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 (VAMP2) on synaptic vesicles and the t-SNAREs syntaxin-1A and synaptosomal-associated protein 25 (SNAP-25) on the plasma membrane (Banerjee et al., 2020). Formation of this complex drives vesicle fusion and exocytosis (Lv et al., 2008; Rowe et al., 2001). After release, extracellular DA is cleared by DAT for repackaging or degradation. Because both release and DAT-mediated reuptake occur within the terminal of DA neurons, each process is likely to be sensitive to alterations in membrane cholesterol.

Several lines of evidence support a role for cholesterol in regulating both DA release and DAT-mediated reuptake. For instance, in PC12 cells, acute depletion of membrane cholesterol using methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD) reduces potassium chloride- and ATP-evoked DA release (Chamberlain et al., 2001; Lang et al., 2001). To date, few, if any, studies have examined the effects of cholesterol depletion on evoked DA release in animal brain tissue. Cholesterol also influences DA reuptake through its effects on DAT. Structural and computational studies indicate that the presence of cholesterol promotes the outward-facing conformation of DAT, which favors high-affinity substrate binding and the binding of inhibitors such as cocaine (Penmatsa et al., 2013; Zeppelin et al., 2018). Consistent with this, cholesterol depletion using MβCD decreases DAT-mediated DA reuptake and attenuates cocaine inhibition of DAT in HEK293 cells, N2A cells, and rat striatal synaptosomes (Hong and Amara, 2010; Jones et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2023). In striatal slices, indirectly altering cholesterol availability with probucol, which inhibits cholesterol efflux, also impairs DAT-dependent DA reuptake (Threlfell et al., 2021). Collectively, these studies show that cholesterol contributes to both DA release and reuptake; however, whether direct cholesterol depletion disrupts both of these coordinated processes in native striatal tissue has yet to be explored. Because DA signaling arises from the dynamic balance between release and reuptake, measuring both processes simultaneously is essential for determining how cholesterol depletion alters overall DA dynamics (Sulzer et al., 2016). Such insights may provide a mechanistic foundation for understanding neurological disorders associated with disrupted cholesterol homeostasis.

One mechanism by which cholesterol depletion may impair DA transmission is by disrupting the membrane organization of proteins involved in DA release and reuptake. Namely, lipid rafts serve as platforms for assembling the proteins that facilitate vesicle fusion and exocytosis, and cholesterol depletion via MβCD alters the raft association of several proteins involved in this process (Chamberlain et al., 2001; Gil et al., 2005; Lang, 2007). For example, treatment with saponin, which sequesters cholesterol, fully displaced syntaxin-1A, SNAP-25, and VAMP2 from lipid rafts in PC12 cells (Chamberlain et al., 2001). Further, high concentrations of MβCD removed 90% of membrane cholesterol and partially displaced these same SNARE proteins, along with synaptotagmin-1, from raft fractions in rat synaptosomes (Gil et al., 2005). Moreover, DAT is distributed across both lipid raft and non-raft microdomains; however, the effects of MβCD on DAT raft association are not consistently observed across cell types, including LLC-PK1, HEK293, and MN9D cells (Foster et al., 2008; Hong and Amara, 2010; Jones et al., 2012). Importantly, the effects of cholesterol depletion on DAT raft association in animal brain tissue have yet to be investigated. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to determine whether cholesterol depletion would alter both DA release and reuptake in striatal tissue and identify the molecular components involved in these processes.

Cholesterol may also regulate DA terminal function through effects on the actin cytoskeleton. Actin exists in a dynamic equilibrium between globular (G)-actin monomers and filamentous (F)-actin polymers (Li et al., 2024; Mundhara et al., 2019). The continuous cycling between these two states is critical for multiple aspects of vesicular release, including vesicle mobilization from reserve pools, trafficking to active zones, and positioning of vesicles for docking and fusion (Dillon and Goda, 2005). At presynaptic terminals, F-actin provides cytoskeletal “tracks” that guide the movement of synaptic vesicles to the readily-releasable pool (Prekeris and Terrian, 1997; Zhang and Augustine, 2021). Disruption of this G/F actin balance can therefore impair efficient vesicle organization and release (Rust and Maritzen, 2015). Membrane cholesterol appears to be important for the regulation of actin dynamics, as MβCD has been shown to decrease actin polymerization in MN9D cells, HeLa cells, and hippocampal cultures (Hering et al., 2003; Li et al., 2015; Mundhara et al., 2019). In turn, actin contributes to the organization of lipid rafts: for example, pharmacological disruption of F-actin polymerization has been shown to reduce the raft association of CaV2.2 in COS-7 cells (Robinson et al., 2010). These observations suggest that cholesterol depletion could impair DA transmission in part by disrupting actin-dependent membrane organization.

In the present study, we used ex vivo fast-scan cyclic voltammetry in rat nucleus accumbens slices together with biochemical assays in striatal synaptosomes to test whether acute cholesterol depletion disrupted evoked DA release and reuptake and whether these functional effects were accompanied by changes in lipid raft organization and actin polymerization. To our knowledge, this is the first study to concurrently assess changes in both DA release and reuptake following cholesterol depletion in native tissue while also examining the underlying mechanisms. Because overall DA signaling is determined by the dynamic interplay between these two tightly coordinated processes, our findings may provide a more holistic understanding of how cholesterol regulates striatal DA transmission.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Animals

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (250–350 g; Envigo, Indianapolis, IN, USA) were housed under temperature- and humidity-controlled conditions on a reverse 12:12 h light/dark cycle (lights on at 0400 h; lights off at 1600 h). Food and water were available ad libitum. All procedures were conducted in Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care-accredited facilities in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Wake Forest University School of Medicine.

2.2. Ex vivo fast-scan cyclic voltammetry

Ex vivo fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV) was used to assess electrically evoked DA release and reuptake in rat brain slices containing the nucleus accumbens (NAc) core, as described previously (Mauterer et al., 2018). All animals were euthanized 4 h into the light phase, and brains were rapidly removed and placed in oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) containing 126 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.2 mM NaH2PO4·H2O, 2.4 mM CaCl2·2H2O, 1.2 mM MgCl2·6H2O, 25 mM NaHCO3, 0.4 mM ascorbic acid, and 11 mM D-glucose. Coronal brain slices (400 μm) containing the NAc core were prepared using a vibrating tissue slicer (Leica VT1200S, Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and transferred to a recording chamber superfused with oxygenated aCSF (32°C, 1 mL/min). A carbon-fiber microelectrode (100–200 μm in length, 7 μm in diameter) and a bipolar stimulating electrode (MS303–3-B-SPC, Plastics One, Roanoke, VA, USA) were positioned in the NAc core. Endogenous DA release was evoked every 3 min using a single electrical pulse (750 μA, 4 ms). This stimulation intensity was selected to produce strong evoked DA signals across recording sites in the NAc core while maintaining stable repeated measurements throughout the drug treatment and avoiding floor effects during treatments expected to reduce DA release. This intensity is consistent with prior ex vivo FSCV studies from our group using peri-maximal single-pulse stimulation at approximately 700 μA (Dawes et al., 2024; Kuiper et al., 2024). The DA signal was detected by applying a triangular voltage waveform (−0.4 to +1.2 to −0.4 V vs Ag/AgCl) at 400 V/s to the recording electrode.

Once evoked DA signals stabilized across three consecutive recordings (defined as <20% variation across >3 consecutive collections), baseline DA release and reuptake were determined. Slices were then perfused for 1 h with oxygenated aCSF containing MβCD (0.3, 3, or 10 mM; C4555, Millipore-Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), followed by washout with aCSF until responses again stabilized. Concentrations and incubation times of MβCD were selected based on previous literature using ex vivo slice preparations (Assaife-Lopes et al., 2014; Ramadhanti et al., 2021; Wang and Schreurs, 2010). After responses re-stabilized, cocaine hydrochloride (0.3–30 μM; National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA) was cumulatively applied to slices for 18 collections (~54 min) per concentration to assess inhibition of DA reuptake as previously described (Estave et al., 2024; Siciliano et al., 2019). Evoked DA signals were modeled using Michaelis-Menten kinetics to estimate the apparent maximal rate of reuptake (Vmax) and apparent Km. Recording electrodes were calibrated using a flow-injection system with 3 μM DA. Data analysis was performed using Demon Voltammetry and Analysis software (Yorgason et al., 2011).

Baseline FSCV experiments included 1–2 slices per rat from 8 to 12 animals per group. A subset of these animals was used for cocaine inhibition experiments (n = 6–8 rats per group, 1–2 slices per rat). For all FSCV analyses, individual slices were treated as independent data points because local DA release and reuptake parameters vary across recording sites within the NAc core to an extent comparable to across-animal variability (Calipari et al., 2012; Dawes et al., 2024).

2.3. Striatal synaptosome preparation

To examine the mechanisms underlying the DA terminal deficits observed with FSCV, we applied the same MβCD concentrations used in slice experiments to striatal synaptosomes. This preparation allowed for more direct biochemical assessment of mechanisms while minimizing the variability associated with tissue thickness and drug penetration in intact slices (Jhou and Tai, 2017; Voss et al., 2013). Additionally, the FSCV paradigm employs repeated electrical stimulation over several hours, which may confound downstream biochemical assessment of membrane protein organization.

Brains were rapidly removed and placed on a cold rat brain matrix, and 1 mm thick coronal slices were obtained. The NAc and dorsal striatum were dissected using anatomical landmarks. These two regions were pooled from each animal to generate enough crude synaptosome for detection of protein compartmentalization in lipid rafts using sucrose density gradient fractionation assays.

Striatal tissue was placed in ice-cold homogenization buffer containing 0.32 M sucrose and 4 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) supplemented with protease inhibitors (P8465; Millipore-Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA) as previously described (Bermejo et al., 2014). Homogenates were centrifuged at 800 × g for 10 min at 4°C to remove nuclei and large debris. The resulting supernatant was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C to obtain crude synaptosome pellets. Pellets were resuspended in oxygenated Krebs-Ringer buffer (KRB), containing 145 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 24.9 mM NaHCO3, 1.0 mM MgCl2, 1.2 mM CaCl2·2H2O, and 10 mM glucose, pH 7.4, supplemented with protease inhibitors.

2.4. Synaptosome treatment with methyl-β-cyclodextrin

Samples were treated with MβCD (0.3, 3, or 10 mM) prepared in KRB containing protease inhibitors and incubated at 37°C for 30 min with gentle agitation. The concentrations and incubation times for MβCD were selected based on prior studies using striatal membrane preparations (Hong and Amara, 2010; Morissette et al., 2018; Teixeira et al., 2012). Incubation time was shortened to 30 min compared to 1 h for FSCV experiments to account for the increased membrane accessibility for drugs in synaptosomes (Borisova, 2013; Tarasenko et al., 2010). After incubation, reactions were terminated by adding ice-cold KRB, and samples were centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C. Supernatants were discarded, and pellets were resuspended in the appropriate buffer for biochemical assays.

2.5. Laurdan generalized polarization assay

To determine whether cholesterol depletion with MβCD altered membrane order as defined by membrane fluidity and rigidity, we performed the Laurdan generalized polarization (GP) assay in synaptosomes as previously described (Vošahlíková et al., 2021). Synaptosomes were treated with MβCD (0.3, 3, and 10 mM) to match those used in FSCV experiments, and 50 mM MβCD was included as a positive control to confirm that the Laurdan GP assay could detect changes in membrane order following substantial cholesterol depletion. After MβCD treatment, pellets were resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6). Samples were incubated with 10 μM Laurdan (7275, Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK) prepared in N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF; final DMF concentration <0.5%) for 60 min at 37°C in the dark with gentle agitation. Samples were then centrifuged, and pellets were resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6) for the assay. Blank wells containing buffer and Laurdan only were included to control for background fluorescence.

Fluorescence emission was recorded at 440 nm and 490 nm following excitation at 350 nm. Background fluorescence from blank wells was subtracted from all measurements. Laurdan generalized polarization (GP) was calculated using:

GP=I440−I490I440+I490

where I440 and I490 represent fluorescence intensities at 440 nm and 490 nm, respectively. Higher GP values correspond to increased membrane lipid order and rigidity, whereas lower GP values indicate reduced lipid order and increased membrane fluidity. GP values were averaged across triplicates and expressed as mean ± SEM.

2.6. Sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation

Following MβCD treatment, synaptosome pellets were suspended in MBS-T buffer (25 mM MES, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, pH 6.5) containing protease inhibitors. Samples were homogenized using a Dounce homogenizer and sheared through a 25-gauge needle. Homogenates were incubated on ice for 30 min and then centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 min at 4°C to remove insoluble material. Aliquots of the resulting supernatant were reserved for cholesterol quantification by the Amplex Red assay, while the remaining lysate was used for sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation.

Sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation was used to isolate raft-enriched and non-raft membrane fractions, adapted from previously established protocols (Chen et al., 2007; Gil et al., 2005). Lysates were mixed with an equal volume of 80% sucrose solution resulting in 40% sucrose in MBS buffer (1.6 mL total volume). The sample was then overlaid with 1.8 mL of 30% sucrose, followed by 800 μL of 5% sucrose. Gradients (4.2 mL final volume) were centrifuged at 200,000 × g for 18 h at 4°C using an SW55 Ti rotor (342196; Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) in an Optima XE-90 ultracentrifuge (A94471; Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Following centrifugation, 15 equal-volume fractions were collected from the top of the gradient. Detergent-resistant, raft-enriched fractions consistently localized to the 5–30% sucrose interface (typically fractions 4–6). All fractions were stored at −80°C until further analysis.

2.7. Western blot

Western blotting was performed to detect the abundance of proteins in each fraction. Because non-raft fractions contain substantially more protein than raft fractions (Gil et al., 2005; Levitt et al., 2009), loading equal volumes produced disproportionately stronger signal in non-raft fractions and made concurrent quantification in both raft and non-raft fractions difficult (Supplemental Fig. 1). Therefore, loading volumes were adjusted across the gradient as follows: 35 μL for raft fractions 4–6 (flotillin-positive), 17.5 μL for fractions 7–12, and 11.67 μL for non-raft fractions 13–15 (transferrin-positive). Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature in 5% non-fat milk prepared in Tris-buffered saline containing 1% Tween-20 (TBST), followed by overnight incubation at 4°C with the appropriate primary antibodies (Table 1). The next day, membranes were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with an appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody. In some experiments, membranes were cut into strips to allow simultaneous probing of proteins with different molecular weights. Chemiluminescent signal was detected using Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate (32106; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and imaged with a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Band intensities were quantified using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), and data were expressed as the percentage of total signal present in flotillin-positive fractions (fractions 4–6) relative to the total signal across all fractions and normalized to control. Flotillin was confirmed to be present only in fractions 4–6 (Supplemental Fig. 2).

Table 1.

Antibodies used for western blotting.

Target (Source) Molecular Weight (kDa) Supplier Identifier Dilution
β-actin (mouse) 42 Santa Cruz 47778 1:1000
CaV2.2 (Rabbit) 190 Cell Signaling 35175 1:200
Dopamine Transporter (Rabbit) 78 Millipore AB15191 1:1000
Flotillin (Mouse) 47 Santa Cruz Sc-74566 1:250
GAPDH (Mouse) 37 Santa Cruz 365062 1:1000
Goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP - Cell Signaling 7076 1:4000
Goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP - Cell Signaling 7074 1:4000
Syntaxin-1A (Rabbit) 33 Cell Signaling 18572 1:1000
Synaptotagmin-1 (Rabbit) 60 Cell Signaling 14558 1:1000
SNAP-25 (Rabbit) 25 Cell Signaling 5308 1:1000
Transferrin Receptor (Mouse) 80 Invitrogen 13–6800 1:1000
VAMP2 (Rabbit) 13 Cell Signaling 13508 1:1000

For total protein expression, 30 μg of protein per sample was loaded onto SDS-PAGE gels, and western blotting was performed as described above. Band intensities were quantified using ImageJ and normalized to GAPDH to account for loading variability. Data are expressed relative to control and presented as mean ± SEM.

2.8. Amplex Red Cholesterol assay

Aliquots of synaptosomal lysate were used to quantify free (unesterified) cholesterol, as 99.5% of brain cholesterol exists in its unesterified form (Björkhem and Meaney, 2004). Protein concentrations were measured using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (23225; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Free cholesterol content was quantified using the Amplex Red Cholesterol Assay Kit (A12216; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, samples were diluted in the kit’s reaction buffer and incubated with Amplex Red working solution (150 μM Amplex Red, 1 U/mL cholesterol oxidase, and 1 U/mL horseradish peroxidase) at 37°C for 30 min. This reaction produces resorufin, a fluorescent product, which was measured using a SpectraMax i3x plate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) with excitation at 560 nm and emission at 590 nm. Free cholesterol concentrations were calculated from a standard curve and normalized to sample protein content. Cholesterol concentrations were averaged across triplicates and expressed as mean ± SEM.

2.9. G:F-actin centrifugation assay in striatal synaptosomes

To determine the effect of MβCD treatment on actin polymerization, a G:F-actin sedimentation assay was performed to fractionate globular and polymerized actin according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BK037; Cytoskeleton Inc., Denver, CO, USA). Lysis and F-actin stabilization buffer (LAS1) was prepared using 50 mM PIPES (pH 6.9), 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA, 5% glycerol, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1% Tween-20, and 0.1% 2-mercaptoethanol, adjusted to pH 6.9. The working buffer (LAS2) was prepared by supplementing LAS1 with 1 mM ATP and protease inhibitors.

Striatal synaptosomes were treated with 3 mM MβCD, followed by centrifugation and resuspension of pellets in LAS2 at a 1:10 (w/v) pellet: buffer ratio. Homogenates were incubated in LAS2 at 37°C for 10 min to stabilize polymerized actin and centrifuged at 350 × g for 5 min to pellet tissue debris. The resulting supernatant was then ultracentrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h at 37°C, yielding a supernatant containing detergent-soluble G-actin and a pellet containing detergent-insoluble F-actin. The F-actin pellet was resuspended in an equal volume of freshly prepared 8 M urea and incubated at 4°C for 1 h with gentle rotation to depolymerize F-actin into G-actin prior to western blotting. Equal volumes of G- and F-actin fractions were mixed with 5x SDS sample buffer and heated at 55°C for 5 min. For immunoblotting, 10 μL of each fraction was resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to membranes. The G:F-actin ratio was calculated for each sample, and data are expressed relative to vehicle control as mean ± SEM.

2.10. Phalloidin labeling of F-actin in striatal slices

Rat brains were rapidly removed after anesthesia, embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound, and stored at −80°C until sectioning. Coronal sections (12 μm) containing the NAc were equilibrated in aCSF for 10 min, then treated with 3 mM MβCD or vehicle at 37°C for 60 min. Sections were washed, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 1.5 h on ice, and then permeabilized and blocked for 1.5 h in 10% normal goat serum with 0.3% Triton X-100. F-actin was labeled with Alexa Fluor 488-phalloidin (A12379; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 2 h at room temperature in the dark, and slides were mounted with ProLong™ Gold Antifade containing DAPI (P36931, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Imaging was performed using a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope equipped with a 20x (0.8 NA) objective. Confocal z-stacks encompassing the 12 μm slice tissue depth were acquired using identical laser power, detector gain, and pinhole settings (1.4 AU) for DAPI and Alexa Fluor 488 across all groups. Z-stacks were converted into maximum intensity projections for image analysis. Each channel was subjected to a uniform thresholding value to distinguish signal from background for quantification. For each section, three equal-area regions of interest (ROIs) were selected within the NAc. Phalloidin fluorescence intensity was normalized to DAPI signal. ROI intensity values were averaged for each section (n = 4 sections/group). Data are presented as relative to control.

2.11. Data analysis

Primary statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 10 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test when appropriate, and all datasets met assumptions of normality. Unpaired Student’s t-tests were used to compare two groups. A one-way or two-way ANOVA was used to examine differences among groups when appropriate, followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test. For cocaine concentration-response experiments, apparent Km values across concentrations were analyzed using a mixed-effects model with Geisser-Greenhouse correction. Measurements were averaged for experiments that included replicates. A p value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. To estimate effect sizes, Cohen’s d was used for two-group comparisons. Post hoc sensitivity analyses were performed using G*Power version 3.1.9.7 (Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany) to determine the minimum detectable effect size for the sample sizes used in Figs. 2 and 3. These analyses assumed two-tailed independent samples t-tests with α = 0.05, power = 0.80, and equal group sizes.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Cholesterol depletion altered the lipid raft association of proteins involved in exocytosis in striatal synaptosomes. (A) Free cholesterol measured by Amplex Red was significantly reduced at 3 and 10 mM but not at 0.3 mM. N = 5/group. (B) Membrane order measured by Laurdan GP was not altered by MβCD (0.3–10 mM), except at 50 mM. N = 3/group. (C) Schematic of sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation workflow and representative images using flotillin to define raft fractions and the transferrin receptor to define non-raft fractions. (D-J) Raft association for each protein following treatment with 3 mM MβCD or control. Raft association was calculated as the ratio of protein signals detected in flotillin-positive raft fractions 4–6 relative to total signals across all analyzed fractions, then normalized to vehicle control. MβCD reduced the association of VAMP2 with rafts. Syntaxin-1A, SNAP-25, synaptotagmin-1, CaV2.2, and DAT showed no significant redistribution. N = 4/group. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Effects of MβCD on actin polymerization. (A) Workflow for G-actin/F-actin fractionation in striatal synaptosomes. (B) Representative β-actin blots and quantification showing an increased G:F-actin ratio after 3 mM MβCD treatment (n = 3 animals/group). (C) Illustration of phalloidin binding to F-actin. (D) Confocal images of phalloidin (F-actin; green) and DAPI (nuclei; red) in NAc-containing slices treated with 3 mM MβCD compared to control. Scale bar: 50 μm. (E) Quantification of phalloidin intensity normalized to DAPI showing reduced F-actin levels following MβCD treatment. Points indicate slice means (n = 4 slices/group). Bars show mean ± SEM. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.

3. Results

3.1. MβCD reduced evoked DA release, reuptake, and cocaine inhibition of reuptake

We first tested the effect of acute cholesterol depletion with MβCD on evoked DA transmission using FSCV on slices containing the NAc core. After treatment with vehicle or MβCD (0.3, 3, 10 mM) and restabilization of the signal, evoked DA release and reuptake were measured by FSCV. Post-treatment signals were normalized to each slice’s pre-treatment signal and expressed as percent of each slice’s baseline. Averaged FSCV traces for each group are shown (Fig. 1A). A one-way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of treatment on DA release, F(3,45) = 11.94, p < 0.0001 (Fig. 1B). Tukey’s multiple comparisons test indicated that MβCD significantly reduced evoked release at 3 mM (p < 0.0001) and 10 mM (p = 0.0006) compared with control, corresponding to decreases of 31.78% and 24.90%, respectively. In contrast, 0.3 mM MβCD had no effect (p = 0.462). The 3 mM and 10 mM groups did not differ from each other (p = 0.612).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

MβCD reduced evoked DA release, reuptake, and cocaine inhibition of reuptake in rat NAc slices. (A) Averaged FSCV traces illustrating treatment-dependent changes in evoked DA release and reuptake. Shading represents SEM. After treatment with control (N = 8), 0.3 (N = 8), 3 (N = 9), or 10 (N = 12) mM MβCD, evoked DA release (B) and apparent maximal reuptake rates (Vmax) (C) were measured. Data are expressed as percent of each slice’s own baseline, relative to control. (D) Cocaine concentration-response curves (0.3–30 μM) showing that 3 (N = 7) and 10 mM (N = 8) MβCD reduced cocaine inhibition of reuptake relative to control (N = 6). * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001, **** p ≤ 0.0001. N = number of animals; 1–2 slices/animal. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.

We next assessed whether MβCD affected the maximal DA reuptake rate (Vmax), expressed as percent of each slice’s own baseline (Fig. 1C). A one-way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of treatment on Vmax, F(3,45) = 4.98, p = 0.0046. Tukey’s multiple comparisons test indicated that MβCD significantly reduced Vmax at 3 mM (p = 0.0134) and 10 mM (p = 0.0193) relative to control, corresponding to decreases of 19.10% and 17.98%, respectively. In contrast, 0.3 mM MβCD did not differ from the control, p = 0.8172. The 3 mM and 10 mM groups did not differ from each other, p = 0.9972.

Previous studies have demonstrated that cholesterol is necessary for maintaining the outward-facing conformation of DAT (Hong and Amara, 2010; Penmatsa et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2023; Zeppelin et al., 2018). Extracellular DA binds initially to DAT when it is in the outward-facing conformation, and cocaine preferentially binds to and stabilizes this outward-facing state. Therefore, we used cocaine as a probe to assess whether MβCD altered the availability of the outward-facing conformation of DAT in striatal tissue. To test this, we generated cocaine concentration-response curves (0.3–30 μM) and calculated apparent Km values following treatment with 3 and 10 mM MβCD (Fig. 1D). A mixed-effects model with Geisser-Greenhouse correction showed significant main effects of cocaine concentration, F(1.216, 25.85) = 107.2, p < 0.0001, MβCD treatment, F(2, 23) = 4.522, p = 0.0221, and a cocaine x MβCD interaction, F(8, 85) = 3.216, p = 0.0031. Overall, these findings demonstrated that MβCD impaired DA release and reuptake and altered the ability of cocaine to inhibit DA reuptake.

3.2. MβCD selectively altered the lipid raft association of proteins involved in neurotransmitter release in striatal synaptosomes

We next investigated whether cholesterol depletion altered the lipid raft compartmentalization of proteins involved in DA release in striatal synaptosomes. Cholesterol content was measured using an Amplex Red Cholesterol assay following treatment with 0.3, 3, or 10 mM MβCD (Fig. 2A). A one-way ANOVA indicated a significant main effect of MβCD treatment, F(3,16) = 5.80, p = 0.0070. Post hoc Tukey’s tests revealed reduced cholesterol at 3 mM (p = 0.039) and 10 mM (p = 0.040), but not 0.3 mM (p > 0.99). Notably, cholesterol decreased by ~40% at both 3 and 10 mM, suggesting that cholesterol depletion plateaued within this concentration range.

To determine whether MβCD disrupted membrane order, we measured Laurdan generalized polarization (GP) across different concentrations of MβCD: 0.3, 3, 10, and 50 mM (Fig. 2B). A one-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect of treatment on GP, F(4,10) = 4.999, p = 0.0178. Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test showed that GP was significantly reduced only at 50 mM MβCD compared to control (p = 0.0098), whereas no significant differences were observed at 0.3, 3, or 10 mM (p ≥ 0.2211). These results indicate that MβCD reduced synaptosomal cholesterol at 3 and 10 mM without measurably disrupting overall membrane packing, whereas 50 mM MβCD produced a significant reduction in GP values, suggesting that the membrane is more fluid under this condition.

Lipid rafts are cholesterol-enriched membrane microdomains that assemble proteins for efficient signaling, and MβCD is widely used to perturb raft organization by extracting membrane cholesterol (Meza et al., 2023). We therefore tested whether 3 mM MβCD altered the association of proteins involved in exocytosis with raft and non-raft microdomains using sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation of striatal synaptosomes. To define lipid raft and non-raft regions, we used flotillin, a well-established raft marker, and the transferrin receptor, a non-raft marker (Brown, 2006; Nothdurfter et al., 2007). Flotillin was present solely in fractions 4–6 and the transferrin receptor was present in fractions 13–15 (Fig. 2C). Therefore, fractions 4–6 were designated as raft fractions and fractions 13–15 as non-raft fractions, and these regions were used to determine the relative raft distribution of the proteins probed here.

Because MβCD reduced DA release, we asked whether this effect might be associated with altered raft localization of proteins involved in exocytosis. Vesicular neurotransmitter release, including DA release, is mediated by the assembly of the core SNARE complex consisting of syntaxin-1A, SNAP-25, and VAMP2 (Alexander et al., 2018; Chamberlain and Gould, 2002). Previous studies have shown that lipid rafts regulate SNARE-mediated exocytosis by coordinating the spatial organization of SNARE proteins (Chamberlain et al., 2001; Salaün et al., 2005a). Treatment with MβCD decreased the relative raft association of VAMP2 compared to vehicle-treated controls (Fig. 2F), t(6) = 2.983, p = 0.0245, with a large observed effect size, Cohen’s d = 2.11. Post hoc sensitivity analysis indicated that n = 4/group provides 80% power to detect only very large effects of Cohen’s d ≥ 2.38. MβCD did not significantly alter the relative raft association of syntaxin-1A (Fig. 2D), t(6) = 0.9173, p = 0.3944, or SNAP-25 (Fig. 2E), t(6) = 0.2265, p = 0.8284. We next examined synaptotagmin-1 and CaV2.2, key components of the calcium-dependent machinery that trigger synaptic vesicle fusion (Banerjee et al., 2020; Xia et al., 2007). Treatment with MβCD did not alter the relative raft association of synaptotagmin-1 (Fig. 2H), t(6) = 1.378, p = 0.2174, or CaV2.2 (Fig. 2G), t(6) = 0.9820, p = 0.3640. Cholesterol depletion could also have reduced DA reuptake by altering the raft compartmentalization of DAT. However, relative DAT raft association did not change following MβCD treatment (Fig. 2J), t(6) = 0.5470, p = 0.6041. Total expression of all measured proteins remained unchanged (Supplemental Fig. 3). Together, these data suggest that VAMP2 raft association is particularly sensitive to cholesterol depletion compared with the other proteins examined in this study.

3.3. MβCD decreased actin polymerization

Because MβCD decreased the raft association of VAMP2, a v-SNARE protein involved in vesicle docking and fusion, we next asked whether cholesterol depletion also disrupted the actin cytoskeleton, which coordinates synaptic vesicle trafficking and availability for exocytosis. Vesicle release depends on the dynamic balance between F-actin polymers and G-actin monomers. Polymerized F-actin helps organize vesicle pools and position vesicles near release sites, whereas the continuous turnover between F- and G-actin is required for vesicle mobilization, recruitment, and recycling during neurotransmitter release (Boiero Sanders et al., 2024). To test whether cholesterol depletion altered actin polymerization, we treated striatal synaptosomes and slices containing the NAc with 3 mM MβCD and quantified F-actin content.

We first performed an actin fractionation assay in synaptosomes to separate G-actin from F-actin. Immunoblotting of β-actin, one of the major actin isoforms in the brain, revealed that MβCD increased the G:F-actin ratio, t(4) = 2.924, p = 0.0431, Cohen’s d = 2.39, corresponding to a ~2.54-fold shift toward monomeric G-actin (Fig. 3A–B). Post hoc sensitivity analysis indicated that n = 3/group provides 80% power to detect only very large effects of approximately Cohen’s d ≥ 3.07. As a complementary approach, we used phalloidin to visualize F-actin in NAc-containing slices treated with MβCD. Phalloidin is a fluorescent probe that binds a hydrophobic cleft formed between adjacent actin subunits along F-actin filaments (Fig. 3C). Phalloidin staining was reduced in MβCD-treated slices compared with control (Fig. 3D). Quantification of phalloidin intensity normalized to DAPI confirmed a marked reduction, t(6) = 6.086, p = 0.0009, Cohen’s d = 4.30, reflecting a ~3-fold lower phalloidin signal in the MβCD group (Fig. 3E). For the phalloidin assay, sensitivity analysis indicated that n = 4/group provides 80% power to detect effects of approximately Cohen’s d ≥ 2.38. These findings show that acute membrane cholesterol depletion decreased F-actin content and shifted the actin pool toward the monomeric (G-actin) state, which is consistent with destabilization of the actin cytoskeleton.

4. Discussion

The present study revealed four major findings. First, membrane cholesterol depletion by MβCD impaired electrically evoked DA release and reuptake, providing the first direct evidence in native striatal tissue that cholesterol simultaneously regulates both processes that govern striatal DA homeostasis. Second, cholesterol depletion reduced the ability of cocaine to inhibit DAT-mediated DA reuptake, consistent with the notion that cholesterol promotes the outward-facing conformation of DAT required for high-affinity ligand binding. Third, the reduction in DAT function did not appear to result from altered membrane compartmentalization of DAT or its known interacting partner syntaxin-1A, as neither protein showed a change in raft partitioning following cholesterol depletion. Finally, MβCD disrupted the lipid raft association of the vesicle-associated SNARE protein VAMP2 and reduced actin polymerization, suggesting that cholesterol depletion may dysregulate aspects of neurotransmitter vesicle trafficking and fusion that underlie DA release.

4.1. Cholesterol depletion disrupts DAT-mediated DA reuptake

We found that MβCD significantly reduced electrically evoked DA reuptake in striatal slices. This finding aligns with prior reports showing that MβCD (2.5–10 mM) impairs DAT function in HEK293 cells, N2A cells, EM4 cells, and striatal synaptosomes (Cremona et al., 2011; Hong and Amara, 2010; Jones et al., 2012; Rudin et al., 2026; Wang et al., 2023). Importantly, because Laurdan GP was unchanged at MβCD concentrations that impaired DA reuptake, these effects are likely not explained by nonspecific disruption of bulk membrane order. Structural, computational, and biochemical studies show that membrane cholesterol stabilizes the outward-facing DAT conformation, which is required for initial DA binding during transport (Hong and Amara, 2010; Penmatsa et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2023; Zeppelin et al., 2018). Cocaine preferentially binds to and stabilizes this outward-facing state and thus serves as a functional probe of the availability of DAT in this conformation (Beuming et al., 2008). Our finding that MβCD reduced the ability of cocaine to inhibit DA reuptake in striatal slices further supports the notion that cholesterol depletion reduces DAT function by destabilizing the outward-facing DAT conformation required for high-affinity DA reuptake. Alternatively, decreased DA reuptake could be due to reduced DAT surface availability. However, prior surface biotinylation experiments in HEK293 cells, LLC-PK1 cells, and rat striatal preparations have generally reported little to no reduction in basal surface DAT levels following MβCD treatment (Foster et al., 2008; Hong and Amara, 2010; Jones et al., 2012). While one study observed a modest (~16%) decrease in surface DAT in LLC-PK1 cells (Foster et al., 2008), the same treatment reduced DA uptake by 32%, suggesting that reduced surface DAT expression may not solely explain reduced DAT function.

We next determined whether DAT lipid raft association in striatal synaptosomes was altered. DAT was detected in both lipid raft and non-raft fractions, with the majority of DAT localized to non-raft regions. However, cholesterol depletion with MβCD did not alter DAT raft partitioning. To our knowledge, this is the first study in native striatal tissue to examine DAT raft localization following cholesterol depletion. Our findings are consistent with a previous study in LLC-PK1 cells showing no change in DAT raft association after 5 mM MβCD treatment using a Triton X-100-based fractionation (Foster et al., 2008). In contrast, other studies reported that 5 mM MβCD displaced DAT from raft fractions in HEK293 cells using a Brij-58-based fractionation (Hong and Amara, 2010; Jones et al., 2012). These inconsistencies likely reflect differences in model system, detergent extraction conditions, and baseline membrane cholesterol content (Hovde et al., 2019). More importantly, it has been demonstrated that disruption of DAT raft organization alone is insufficient to account for reduced DAT uptake, as treatment with nystatin, which disrupts lipid rafts but maintains cholesterol in the membrane, does not alter DAT-mediated DA uptake in HEK293 or EM4 cells (Cremona et al., 2011; Jones et al., 2012).

We also assessed whether MβCD altered the raft association of syntaxin-1A, which physically couples to DAT and modulates DA reuptake (Binda et al., 2008; Carvelli et al., 2008; Cervinski et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2004). However, syntaxin-1A was almost exclusively present in non-raft fractions in the present study, which is largely in agreement with prior literature in rat brain tissue and PC12 cells (Bacia et al., 2004; Hering et al., 2003; Lang, 2007; Lang et al., 2001). Importantly, syntaxin-1A raft localization was unchanged following cholesterol depletion, suggesting that syntaxin-1A did not play a role in MβCD-induced deficits in DA reuptake. Overall, these findings suggest that MβCD-induced reductions in DA reuptake are primarily attributed to alterations in DAT’s conformational state and are not explained by the redistribution of DAT or the DAT-interacting protein syntaxin-1A between lipid raft and non-raft microdomains. Future studies should determine whether cholesterol depletion alters the raft localization of other DAT interacting partners that modulate DAT-mediated uptake, such as protein kinase C, synaptogyrin-3, the DA D2 receptor, and σ-1 receptors (Hadlock et al., 2011; Sambo et al., 2018). Prior work has shown that σ1 receptors can interact with DAT and promote an outward-facing DAT conformation that facilitates cocaine binding (Hong et al., 2017). In addition, σ1 receptors can bind cholesterol and associate with lipid rafts (Palmer et al., 2007); therefore, cholesterol depletion may disrupt σ1 receptor-dependent regulation of DAT. Cholesterol depletion could also alter DAT phosphorylation at sites such as the N-terminal Thr53 residue, which regulates DAT-mediated uptake and cocaine binding (Challasivakanaka et al., 2017; Foster et al., 2012). Thr53 is a substrate for phosphorylation by MAPK family kinases, which can be activated by receptor tyrosine kinases to modulate DAT-mediated uptake (Gorentla et al., 2009; Hoover et al., 2007). Because receptor tyrosine kinases and downstream signaling complexes can be organized within lipid rafts at the plasma membrane (Domenichini et al., 2025), cholesterol depletion could alter this kinase membrane localization and disrupt MAPK signaling, leading to changes in DAT phosphorylation and reuptake function.

4.2. Cholesterol depletion reduces evoked DA release

Cholesterol depletion with MβCD reduced electrically evoked DA release in NAc slices, showing for the first time that membrane cholesterol depletion impairs DA release in native striatal tissue. To our knowledge, only two prior studies in PC12 cells have directly examined the effects of cholesterol depletion on DA release. One study found that MβCD (15 Mm, 30 min) reduced K+-evoked DA release (Lang et al., 2001), and another similarly found that treatment with lovastatin, a cholesterol synthesis inhibitor, combined with 5 mM MβCD decreased ATP-stimulated [3H]DA release (Chamberlain et al., 2001). Similar effects have been reported for glutamate release in brain tissue (Choi et al., 2015; Gil et al., 2005; Teixeira et al., 2012). For example, MβCD (1–10 mM, 10 min) reduced KCl-evoked glutamate release in rat cortical synaptosomes (Teixeira et al., 2012). Moreover, evoked glutamate release was reduced by ~70% in cultured hippocampal neurons from Niemann-Pick type C1-deficient mice, in which improper cholesterol trafficking reduces cholesterol content at synaptic terminals (Wasser et al., 2007). Crucially, this deficit was rescued by exogenous cholesterol addition, demonstrating a direct causal role for cholesterol in glutamate release. Collectively, prior work demonstrates that membrane cholesterol is an essential regulator of evoked neurotransmitter release, and our study extends these findings to striatal DA exocytosis in intact tissue. It is also important to note that membrane cholesterol depletion may influence postsynaptic mechanisms that regulate extracellular DA tone. For example, postsynaptic D2 receptor signaling can feed back onto DA terminals to modulate release (Anzalone et al., 2012). Thus, cholesterol depletion could potentially alter postsynaptic D2 receptor signaling and thereby indirectly affect feedback mechanisms that regulate presynaptic DA release, which warrants further investigation.

To identify the mechanisms underlying MβCD-induced reductions in DA release, we first examined whether cholesterol depletion altered the lipid raft localization of proteins involved in Ca2+-triggered exocytosis. At baseline, CaV2.2 channels primarily localized to raft fractions, whereas synaptotagmin-1 only partially associated with rafts, consistent with prior reports in synaptosomes and heterologous expression systems (Gil et al., 2005; Jia et al., 2006; Robinson et al., 2010; Ronzitti et al., 2014). Neither protein showed redistribution following MβCD treatment, suggesting that altered raft association of exocytosis steps beyond Ca2+ entry may better explain the effects of cholesterol depletion on DA release.

Because assembly of the core SNARE complex is required for synaptic vesicle fusion and DA release (Fortin et al., 2006), we next assessed whether MβCD altered the raft association of SNARE proteins. SNAP-25 showed strong raft partitioning at baseline, whereas syntaxin-1A localized predominantly to non-raft fractions, and VAMP2 exhibited modest raft association. This heterogeneous distribution is consistent with previous studies in synaptosomes and neuronal cell lines (Bacia et al., 2004; Gil et al., 2006; Greaves et al., 2010; Jia et al., 2006; Lang, 2007; Salaün et al., 2005b). Following MβCD treatment, the raft association of SNAP-25 and syntaxin-1A was unchanged; however, VAMP2 partially translocated out of raft fractions. This observation suggests that the membrane organization of the vesicle-associated v-SNARE VAMP2 is more vulnerable to cholesterol depletion than that of the plasma membrane-associated t-SNAREs syntaxin-1A and SNAP-25. Given that synaptic vesicles are highly enriched in cholesterol, disrupted organization of vesicle-associated VAMP2 could impair SNARE complex assembly and thereby contribute to MβCD-induced reductions in release. The sensitivity of VAMP2 to cholesterol depletion is supported by prior studies. For example, MβCD reduced evoked glutamate release in mouse hippocampal neurons of wild-type mice, but not of VAMP2 knockout mice, suggesting that cholesterol depletion impairs a VAMP2-dependent step of exocytosis (Wasser et al., 2007). Further, in reconstituted vesicles, VAMP2 has been demonstrated to adopt conformations that favor SNARE complex assembly in raft-like environments, whereas non-raft environments reduce VAMP2’s availability for assembly (Wang et al., 2020). Taken together, even a partial loss of raft-associated VAMP2 could impair the formation of SNARE complexes and reduce the efficiency of evoked vesicular exocytosis.

Reduced DA release by MβCD could also result from disruption of the actin cytoskeleton. The dynamic cycling between F- and G-actin organizes vesicle pools and provides structural tracks that mobilize vesicles toward release sites, and F-actin further mediates synaptic vesicle positioning and fusion (Morales et al., 2000; Nolan et al., 2020; Zhang and Augustine, 2021). Disruption of actin polymerization has been shown to reduce presynaptic glutamate release probability in rat hippocampal slices (Kim and Lisman, 1999). Actin filaments are also closely linked to membrane cholesterol, as cholesterol-rich lipid rafts are physically and functionally coupled to F-actin pools that help maintain membrane organization and compartmentalization (Biswas et al., 2019; Chichili and Rodgers, 2009; Cubí et al., 2013). Therefore, cholesterol depletion could disrupt actin dynamics by altering the association between the actin cytoskeleton and lipid rafts. In the current study, treatment of both synaptosomes and striatal slices with MβCD reduced actin polymerization, as indicated by an increased G:F-actin ratio and reduced phalloidin labeling, respectively. Previous reports have similarly shown that treatment with MβCD (5 mM, 20 min) reduced phalloidin labeling in hippocampal neurons, which was reversed by pharmacological stabilization of actin polymerization (Hering et al., 2003). To directly test whether actin depolymerization contributes to MβCD-induced DA release deficits, we attempted to stabilize actin with jasplakinolide following MβCD treatment in slices. However, jasplakinolide alone further reduced evoked DA release, making rescue experiments difficult to interpret (Supplemental Fig. 4). This suggests that disruption of actin polymerization in either direction can disrupt evoked DA release. Our finding that MβCD reduced the raft association of VAMP2 may also be relevant to the observed effects of cholesterol depletion on actin dynamics, as VAMP2 is located on synaptic vesicles, and F-actin mobilizes those vesicles to release sites at the plasma membrane. These two findings may therefore not be independent. Cholesterol depletion may reduce DA release, in part, by disrupting actin polymerization and thereby impairing vesicle trafficking and positioning at release sites. At the same time, the partial displacement of VAMP2 from lipid rafts suggests that vesicles that reach the membrane may also be less efficiently organized for SNARE complex assembly and fusion.

Importantly, MβCD altered VAMP2 raft association and actin polymerization, which are shared presynaptic mechanisms involved in vesicle trafficking and release across many neurotransmitter systems, suggesting that MβCD’s effects are unlikely to be specific to DA signaling. However, cholesterol depletion does not appear to affect all neurotransmitter systems equally. Consistent with this, 2 mM MβCD for 30 min reduced DAT-mediated uptake in HEK293 cells without significantly altering serotonin or norepinephrine transporter-mediated uptake, whereas higher concentrations impaired uptake across all three transporters (Rudin et al., 2026). In line with this, cholesterol depletion differentially alters the function and localization of some G protein-coupled receptors, as ~15 mM MβCD for 1 h selectively impaired μ-opioid, but not δ-opioid receptor function in HEK293 cells (Levitt et al., 2009). Therefore, it is of interest to determine whether cholesterol depletion in native tissue differentially alters neurotransmitter release across distinct neurotransmitter systems. Further, we selected 3 mM MβCD for downstream assays because it produced deficits in DA release and reuptake and reduced free cholesterol in synaptosomes by ~40%, without significantly altering membrane order, as measured by Laurdan GP. However, while Laurdan GP provides a useful measure of overall membrane packing, this assay may not detect subtle changes in membrane organization. Complementary approaches, such as DPH fluorescence anisotropy, which measures membrane fluidity from a deeper region of the lipid bilayer (Morissette et al., 2018), or di-4-ANEPPDHQ imaging, which distinguishes more ordered, raft-like membrane environments from less ordered, non-raft membrane environments (Jin et al., 2005), could provide a more comprehensive assessment of how MβCD alters membrane organization in synaptosomes. Importantly, changes in cholesterol of similar magnitudes have been previously reported in human neurological disease. For example, a 36% reduction in membrane cholesterol was observed in hippocampal samples from Alzheimer’s disease patients carrying the ApoE4 allele (Ledesma et al., 2003).

It is important to acknowledge that MβCD can also affect other membrane lipids, including phospholipids and sphingolipids. For example, in cultured rat cerebellar granule neurons, 5 mM MβCD for 30 min depleted 50.2% of cholesterol, while also decreasing sphingomyelin, glycosphingolipids, and glycerophospholipids by 2-17% (Ottico et al., 2003). In addition, although MβCD significantly reduced actin polymerization in the present study, other components of vesicle trafficking machinery, such as microtubules, motor proteins, and membrane-associated small GTPases could also be affected and merit further investigation. Moreover, because MβCD was not expected to be able to penetrate thick brain slices evenly, we did not directly validate cholesterol depletion in the slices used for FSCV. Instead, cholesterol content was measured in synaptosomes treated with the same concentrations of MβCD. Because FSCV primarily measures DA transmission on the surface of the slice surrounding the recording electrode, future studies could address this more directly by using thinner slices and measuring cholesterol on more superficial regions with filipin or genetically encoded D4H-based cholesterol sensors (Maekawa, 2017; Sun et al., 2014). Additionally, only male rats were used for all experiments. Although no studies, to our knowledge, have directly compared cholesterol homeostasis between sexes, some studies indirectly indicate that sex differences may exist. For example, PET imaging showed greater striatal binding of a radiolabeled tracer for CYP46A1, a primary brain cholesterol catabolism enzyme, in women compared with men (Haider et al., 2022). This finding suggests that brain cholesterol turnover may differ by sex and that acute cholesterol depletion could have sex-dependent effects on DA terminal function. Future studies should determine whether cholesterol depletion similarly alters DA transmission and neurotransmitter release machinery in females.

4.3. Conclusions

Cholesterol depletion impaired DA release, DAT-mediated DA reuptake, and cocaine inhibition of DA reuptake in native striatal tissue, establishing membrane cholesterol as a key regulator of both major processes that govern overall DA terminal function. The reduction in DAT-dependent DA reuptake is most consistent with destabilization of the outward-facing DAT conformation, whereas impaired evoked DA release may be explained by disrupted raft compartmentalization of the vesicle-associated protein VAMP2 and depolymerization of the actin cytoskeleton. Because dysregulated brain cholesterol metabolism is present in Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, and substance use disorders, all of which involve aberrant DA signaling, the mechanisms identified in the present study may have broad relevance for understanding how membrane lipid disturbances contribute to DA dysfunction in these conditions.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material 1
Supplementary Material 2

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Wake Forest Microscopic Imaging Core Facility and BioRender for the use of their illustration software for creating figures. We thank the NIDA Drug Supply Program for supplying cocaine for these studies. We thank Adeline L. Whisnand for her contributions to experiments.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism through award numbers R01AA030676 (RC) and T32AA007565 (AIN, AMW); the National Institute on Drug Abuse through award numbers R21DA056857 (RC), R01DA054694 (SRJ), T32DA041349 (RDS, MHD, SRJ), and F31DA057815 (MHD); and the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program through award number 2102417 (AIN).

Abbreviations

Ca2+

Calcium

CaV2.2

N-type voltage-gated calcium channel

DA

Dopamine

DAT

Dopamine transporter

DMF

N,N-Dimethylformamide

FSCV

Fast-scan cyclic voltammetry

GP

Generalized polarization

MβCD

Methyl-β-cyclodextrin

NAc

Nucleus accumbens

SNAP-25

Synaptosomal-associated protein of 25 kDa

SNARE

Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor

TBST

Tris-buffered saline containing 1% Tween-20

VAMP2

Vesicle-associated membrane protein 2

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2026.111078.

Footnotes

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Anna I. Neel: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Evelyn T. Lee: Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization. Alyssa M. West: Investigation, Visualization. Monica H. Dawes: Formal analysis, Investigation. Rebekah D. Schlitzer: Investigation. Reid A. Suddaby: Formal analysis, Investigation. Glen S. Marrs: Formal analysis, Methodology. Sara R. Jones: Methodology, Resources, Supervision. Rong Chen: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the manuscript preparation process

During the preparation of this work, the authors used Microsoft M365 Copilot to assist with editing the manuscript text for clarity. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Alexander NJ, Rau AR, Jimenez VA, Daunais JB, Grant KA, McCool BA, 2018. SNARE complex-associated proteins in the lateral amygdala of Macaca mulatta following long-term ethanol drinking. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res 42 (9), 1661–1673. 10.1111/acer.13821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alsebaaly J, Dugast E, Favot L, Rabbaa Khabbaz L, Solinas M, Thiriet N, 2018. Persistent neuroadaptations in the expression of genes involved in cholesterol homeostasis induced by chronic, voluntary alcohol intake in rats. Front. Mol. Neurosci 11, 457. 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anzalone A, Lizardi-Ortiz JE, Ramos M, De Mei C, Hopf FW, Iaccarino C, Halbout B, Jacobsen J, Kinoshita C, Welter M, Caron MG, Bonci A, Sulzer D, Borrelli E, 2012. Dual control of dopamine synthesis and release by presynaptic and postsynaptic dopamine D2 receptors. J. Neurosci 32 (26), 9023–9034. 10.1523/jneurosci.0918-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Assaife-Lopes N, Sousa VC, Pereira DB, Ribeiro JA, Sebastião AM, 2014. Regulation of TrkB receptor translocation to lipid rafts by adenosine A(2A) receptors and its functional implications for BDNF-induced regulation of synaptic plasticity. Purinergic Signal. 10 (2), 251–267. 10.1007/s11302-013-9383-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bacia K, Schuette CG, Kahya N, Jahn R, Schwille P, 2004. SNAREs prefer liquid-disordered over “Raft” (Liquid-ordered) domains when reconstituted into giant unilamellar vesicles * [boxs]. J. Biol. Chem 279 (36), 37951–37955. 10.1074/jbc.M407020200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Banerjee A, Lee J, Nemcova P, Liu C, Kaeser PS, 2020. Synaptotagmin-1 is the Ca (2+) sensor for fast striatal dopamine release. eLife 9, e58359. 10.7554/eL.fe.58359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergquist F, Jonason J, Pileblad E, Nissbrandt H, 1998. Effects of local administration of L-, N-, and P/Q-type calcium channel blockers on spontaneous dopamine release in the striatum and the substantia nigra: a microdialysis study in rat. J. Neurochem 70 (4), 1532–1540. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.70041532.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bermejo MK, Milenkovic M, Salahpour A, Ramsey AJ, 2014. Preparation of synaptic plasma membrane and postsynaptic density proteins using a discontinuous sucrose gradient. J. Vis. Exp 91, e51896. 10.3791/51896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beuming T, Kniazeff J, Bergmann ML, Shi L, Gracia L, Raniszewska K, Newman AH, Javitch JA, Weinstein H, Gether U, Loland CJ, 2008. The binding sites for cocaine and dopamine in the dopamine transporter overlap. Nat. Neurosci 11 (7), 780–789. 10.1038/nn.2146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Binda F, Dipace C, Bowton E, Robertson SD, Lute BJ, Fog JU, Zhang M, Sen N, Colbran RJ, Gnegy ME, Gether U, Javitch JA, Erreger K, Galli A, 2008. Syntaxin 1A interaction with the dopamine transporter promotes amphetamine-induced dopamine efflux. Mol. Pharmacol 74 (4), 1101–1108. 10.1124/mol.108.048447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Biswas A, Kashyap P, Datta S, Sengupta T, Sinha B, 2019. Cholesterol depletion by MβCD enhances cell membrane tension and its variations-reducing integrity. Biophys. J 116 (8), 1456–1468. 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Björkhem I, Meaney S, 2004. Brain cholesterol: long secret life behind a barrier. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol 24 (5), 806–815. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000120374.59826.1b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Block RC, Dorsey ER, Beck CA, Brenna JT, Shoulson I, 2010. Altered cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism in huntington disease. J. Clin. Lipidol 4 (1), 17–23. 10.1016/j.jacl.2009.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Boiero Sanders M, Oosterheert W, Hofnagel O, Bieling P, Raunser S, 2024. Phalloidin and DNase I-bound F-actin pointed end structures reveal principles of filament stabilization and disassembly. Nat. Commun 15 (1), 7969. 10.1038/s41467-024-52251-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Borisova T, 2013. Effects of cholesterol-depleting agent Methyl-β-Cyclodextrin on the functional state of brain nerve terminals. In: Borisova T (Ed.), Cholesterol and Presynaptic Glutamate Transport in the Brain. Springer, New York, pp. 15–23. 10.1007/978-1-4614-7759-4_3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brown DA, 2006. Lipid rafts, detergent-resistant membranes, and raft targeting signals. Physiology (Bethesda) 21, 430–439. 10.1152/physiol.00032.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Calipari ES, Huggins KN, Mathews TA, Jones SR, 2012. Conserved dorsal-ventral gradient of dopamine release and uptake rate in mice, rats and rhesus macaques. Neurochem. Int 61 (7), 986–991. 10.1016/j.neuint.2012.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Carvelli L, Blakely RD, DeFelice LJ, 2008. Dopamine transporter/syntaxin 1A interactions regulate transporter channel activity and dopaminergic synaptic transmission. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 105 (37), 14192–14197. 10.1073/pnas.0802214105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cervinski MA, Foster JD, Vaughan RA, 2010. Syntaxin 1A regulates dopamine transporter activity, phosphorylation and surface expression. Neuroscience 170 (2), 408–416. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.07.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Challasivakanaka S, Zhen J, Smith ME, Reith MEA, Foster JD, Vaughan RA, 2017. Dopamine transporter phosphorylation site threonine 53 is stimulated by amphetamines and regulates dopamine transport, efflux, and cocaine analog binding. J. Biol. Chem 292 (46), 19066–19075. 10.1074/jbc.M117.787002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chamberlain LH, Burgoyne RD, Gould GW, 2001. SNARE proteins are highly enriched in lipid rafts in PC12 cells: implications for the spatial control of exocytosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 98 (10), 5619–5624. 10.1073/pnas.091502398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chamberlain LH, Gould GW, 2002. The Vesicle- and Target-SNARE proteins that mediate Glut4 vesicle fusion are localized in detergent-insoluble lipid rafts present on distinct intracellular membranes. J. Biol. Chem 277 (51), 49750–49754. 10.1074/jbc.M206936200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen P, Gu Z, Liu W, Yan Z, 2007. Glycogen synthase kinase 3 regulates N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor channel trafficking and function in cortical neurons. Mol. Pharmacol 72 (1), 40–51. 10.1124/mol.107.034942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chichili GR, Rodgers W, 2009. Cytoskeleton-membrane interactions in membrane raft structure. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.: CMLS 66 (14), 2319–2328. 10.1007/s00018-009-0022-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Choi TY, Jung S, Nah J, Ko HY, Jo SH, Chung G, Park K, Jung YK, Choi SY, 2015. Low levels of methyl β-cyclodextrin disrupt GluA1-dependent synaptic potentiation but not synaptic depression. J. Neurochem 132 (3), 276–285. 10.1111/jnc.12995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Cremona ML, Matthies HJ, Pau K, Bowton E, Speed N, Lute BJ, Anderson M, Sen N, Robertson SD, Vaughan RA, 2011. Flotillin-1 is essential for PKC-triggered endocytosis and membrane microdomain localization of DAT. Nat. Neurosci 14 (4), 469–477. 10.1038/nn.2781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cubí R, Matas LA, Pou M, Aguilera J, Gil C, 2013. Differential sensitivity to detergents of actin cytoskeleton from nerve endings. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr 1828 (11), 2385–2393. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dawes MH, Ortelli OA, Holleran KM, Jones SR, 2024. Fentanyl self-administration is accelerated by methamphetamine co-use and results in worsened hypodopaminergia in male, but not female rats. Eur. J. Neurosci 60 (8), 5912–5926. 10.1111/ejn.16533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Dietschy JM, 2009. Central nervous system: cholesterol turnover, brain development and neurodegeneration. Biol. Chem 390 (4), 287–293. 10.1515/bc.2009.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Dietschy JM, Turley SD, 2001. Cholesterol metabolism in the brain. Curr. Opin. Lipidol 12 (2), 105–112. 10.1097/00041433-200104000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Dillon C, Goda Y, 2005. The actin cytoskeleton: integrating form and function at the synapse. Annu. Rev. Neurosci 28, 25–55. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Domenichini M, Gogna A, Maggi C, Moreschi E, Ventura A, Codibue M, Grillo E, Corsini M, Mitola S, 2025. Lipid-Protein interplay in the regulation of receptor tyrosine kinases. Cells 14 (23). 10.3390/cells14231836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Estave PM, Albertson SE, Karkhanis AN, Jones SR, 2024. Co-targeting the kappa opioid receptor and dopamine transporter reduces motivation to self-administer cocaine and partially reverses dopamine system dysregulation. Sci. Rep 14 (1), 6509. 10.1038/s41598-024-53463-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Fortin GD, Desrosiers CC, Yamaguchi N, Trudeau LE, 2006. Basal somatodendritic dopamine release requires snare proteins. J. Neurochem 96 (6), 1740–1749. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03699.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Foster JD, Adkins SD, Lever JR, Vaughan RA, 2008. Phorbol ester induced trafficking-independent regulation and enhanced phosphorylation of the dopamine transporter associated with membrane rafts and cholesterol. J. Neurochem 105 (5), 1683–1699. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05262.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Foster JD, Yang JW, Moritz AE, Challasivakanaka S, Smith MA, Holy M, Wilebski K, Sitte HH, Vaughan RA, 2012. Dopamine transporter phosphorylation site threonine 53 regulates substrate reuptake and amphetamine-stimulated efflux. J. Biol. Chem 287 (35), 29702–29712. 10.1074/jbc.M112.367706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gil C, Cubí R, Blasi J, Aguilera J, 2006. Synaptic proteins associate with a sub-set of lipid rafts when isolated from nerve endings at physiological temperature. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 348 (4), 1334–1342. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.07.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gil C, Soler-Jover A, Blasi J, Aguilera J, 2005. Synaptic proteins and SNARE complexes are localized in lipid rafts from rat brain synaptosomes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 329 (1), 117–124. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.01.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Gorentla BK, Moritz AE, Foster JD, Vaughan RA, 2009. Proline-directed phosphorylation of the dopamine transporter N-terminal domain. Biochemistry 48 (5), 1067–1076. 10.1021/bi801696n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Greaves J, Gorleku OA, Salaun C, Chamberlain LH, 2010. Palmitoylation of the SNAP25 protein family: specificity and regulation by DHHC palmitoyl transferases. J. Biol. Chem 285 (32), 24629–24638. 10.1074/jbc.M110.119289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hadlock GC, Nelson CC, Baucum AJ 2nd, Hanson GR, Fleckenstein AE, 2011. Ex vivo identification of protein-protein interactions involving the dopamine transporter. J. Neurosci. Methods 196 (2), 303–307. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.01.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Haider A, Zhao C, Wang L, Xiao Z, Rong J, Xia X, Chen Z, Pfister SK, Mast N, Yutuc E, Chen J, Li Y, Shao T, Warnock GI, Dawoud A, Connors TR, Oakley DH, Wei H, Wang J, Liang SH, 2022. Assessment of cholesterol homeostasis in the living human brain. Sci. Transl. Med 14 (665). 10.1126/scitranslmed.adc9967eadc9967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hering H, Lin CC, Sheng M, 2003. Lipid rafts in the maintenance of synapses, dendritic spines, and surface AMPA receptor stability. J. Neurosci 23 (8), 3262–3271. 10.1523/jneurosci.23-08-03262.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Hong WC, Yano H, Hiranita T, Chin FT, McCurdy CR, Su TP, Amara SG, Katz JL, 2017. The sigma-1 receptor modulates dopamine transporter conformation and cocaine binding and may thereby potentiate cocaine self-administration in rats. J. Biol. Chem 292 (27), 11250–11261. 10.1074/jbc.M116.774075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hong WC, Amara SG, 2010. Membrane cholesterol modulates the outward facing conformation of the dopamine transporter and alters cocaine binding. J. Biol. Chem 285 (42), 32616–32626. 10.1074/jbc.M110.150565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hoover BR, Everett CV, Sorkin A, Zahniser NR, 2007. Rapid regulation of dopamine transporters by tyrosine kinases in rat neuronal preparations. J. Neurochem 101 (5), 1258–1271. 10.1111/j.14714159.2007.04522.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Hovde MJ, Larson GH, Vaughan RA, Foster JD, 2019. Model systems for analysis of dopamine transporter function and regulation. Neurochem. Int 123, 13–21. 10.1016/j.neuint.2018.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Huang X, Sterling NW, Du G, Sun D, Stetter C, Kong L, Zhu Y, Neighbors J, Lewis MM, Chen H, Hohl RJ, Mailman RB, 2019. Brain cholesterol metabolism and Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord 34 (3), 386–395. 10.1002/mds.27609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Inabinett WB, Wang S, Estave PM, Peck EG, Jones SR, Chen R, 2025. Cocaine self-administration differentially modulates the content of cholesterol, progesterone, and testosterone in the brain and plasma of Male rats. Neuroendocrinology 1–10. 10.1159/000544983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Jhou JF, Tai HC, 2017. The study of postmortem human synaptosomes for understanding Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological disorders: a review. Neurol Ther 6 (Suppl. 1), 57–68. 10.1007/s40120-017-0070-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Jia JY, Lamer S, Schümann M, Schmidt MR, Krause E, Haucke V, 2006. Quantitative proteomics analysis of detergent-resistant membranes from chemical synapses: evidence for cholesterol as spatial organizer of synaptic vesicle cycling. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5 (11), 2060–2071. 10.1074/mcp.M600161-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Jin L, Millard AC, Wuskell JP, Clark HA, Loew LM, 2005. Cholesterol-enriched lipid domains can be visualized by di-4-ANEPPDHQ with linear and nonlinear optics. Biophys. J 89 (1), L04–L06. 10.1529/biophysj.105.064816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Jones KT, Zhen J, Reith ME, 2012. Importance of cholesterol in dopamine transporter function. J. Neurochem 123 (5), 700–715. 10.1111/jnc.12007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kim CH, Lisman JE, 1999. A role of actin filament in synaptic transmission and long-term potentiation. J. Neurosci 19 (11), 4314–4324. 10.1523/jneurosci.19-11-04314.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Korade Z, Kenworthy AK, 2008. Lipid rafts, cholesterol, and the brain. Neuropharmacology 55 (8), 1265–1273. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.02.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kreilaus F, Spiro AS, McLean CA, Garner B, Jenner AM, 2016. Evidence for altered cholesterol metabolism in huntington’s disease post mortem brain tissue. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol 42 (6), 535–546. 10.1111/nan.12286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Kuiper LB, Dawes MH, West AM, DiMarco EK, Galante EV, Kishida KT, Jones SR, 2024. Comparison of dopamine release and uptake parameters across sex, species and striatal subregions. Eur. J. Neurosci 60 (6), 5113–5140. 10.1111/ejn.16495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Lang T, 2007. SNARE proteins and ‘membrane rafts’. J. Physiol 585 (Pt 3), 693–698. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.134346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Lang T, Bruns D, Wenzel D, Riedel D, Holroyd P, Thiele C, Jahn R, 2001. SNAREs are concentrated in cholesterol-dependent clusters that define docking and fusion sites for exocytosis. EMBO J. 20 (9), 2202–2213. 10.1093/emboj/20.9.2202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Ledesma MD, Abad-Rodriguez J, Galvan C, Biondi E, Navarro P, Delacourte A, Dingwall C, Dotti CG, 2003. Raft disorganization leads to reduced plasmin activity in Alzheimer’s disease brains. EMBO Rep. 4 (12), 1190–1196. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lee K-H, Kim M-Y, Kim D-H, Lee Y-S, 2004. Syntaxin 1A and receptor for activated C kinase interact with the N-Terminal region of human dopamine transporter. Neurochem. Res 29 (7), 1405–1409. 10.1023/B:NERE.0000026404.08779.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Levitt ES, Clark MJ, Jenkins PM, Martens JR, Traynor JR, 2009. Differential effect of membrane cholesterol removal on mu- and delta-opioid receptors: a parallel comparison of acute and chronic signaling to adenylyl cyclase. J. Biol. Chem 284 (33), 22108–22122. 10.1074/jbc.M109.030411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Li C, Quintana Perez Y, Lamaze C, Blouin CM, 2024. Lipid nanodomains and receptor signaling: from actin-based organization to membrane mechanics. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 86, 102308. 10.1016/j.ceb.2023.102308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Li Y, Pehrson AL, Waller JA, Dale E, Sanchez C, Gulinello M, 2015. A critical evaluation of the activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (Arc/Arg3.1)’s putative role in regulating dendritic plasticity, cognitive processes, and mood in animal models of depression. Front. Neurosci 9, 279. 10.3389/fnins.2015.00279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Lv JH, He L, Sui SF, 2008. Lipid rafts association of synaptotagmin I on synaptic vesicles. Biochemistry (Mosc) 73 (3), 283–288. 10.1134/s0006297908030073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Maekawa M, 2017. Domain 4 (D4) of perfringolysin O to visualize cholesterol in cellular membranes-the update. Sensors (Basel) 17 (3). 10.3390/s17030504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Mauterer MI, Estave PM, Holleran KM, Jones SR, 2018. Measurement of dopamine using fast Scan cyclic voltammetry in rodent brain slices. Bio Protoc 8 (19), e2473. 10.21769/BioProtoc.2473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Meza U, Romero-Méndez C, Sánchez-Armáss S, Rodríguez-Menchaca AA, 2023. Role of rafts in neurological disorders. Neurologia (Engl Ed) 38 (9), 671–680. 10.1016/j.nrleng.2023.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Morales M, Colicos MA, Goda Y, 2000. Actin-dependent regulation of neurotransmitter release at central synapses. Neuron 27 (3), 539–550. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00064-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Morissette M, Morin N, Rouillard C, Di Paolo T, 2018. Membrane cholesterol removal and replenishment affect rat and monkey brain monoamine transporters. Neuropharmacology 133, 289–306. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Mundhara N, Majumder A, Panda D, 2019. Methyl-β-cyclodextrin, an actin depolymerizer augments the antiproliferative potential of microtubule-targeting agents. Sci. Rep 9 (1), 7638. 10.1038/s41598-019-43947-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Nolan SO, Zachry JE, Johnson AR, Brady LJ, Siciliano CA, Calipari ES, 2020. Direct dopamine terminal regulation by local striatal microcircuitry. J. Neurochem 155 (5), 475–493. 10.1111/jnc.15034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Nothdurfter C, Rammes G, Rein T, Rupprecht R, 2007. Pitfalls in isolating lipid rafts. Nat. Rev. Neurosci 8 (7). 10.1038/nrn2059-c1,567-567. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Orth M, Bellosta S, 2012. Cholesterol: its regulation and role in central nervous system disorders. Cholesterol 2012, 292598. 10.1155/2012/292598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Ottico E, Prinetti A, Prioni S, Giannotta C, Basso L, Chigorno V, Sonnino S, 2003. Dynamics of membrane lipid domains in neuronal cells differentiated in culture. J. Lipid Res 44 (11), 2142–2151. 10.1194/jlr.M300247-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Palmer CP, Mahen R, Schnell E, Djamgoz MB, Aydar E, 2007. Sigma-1 receptors bind cholesterol and remodel lipid rafts in breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 67 (23), 11166–11175. 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-07-1771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Penmatsa A, Wang KH, Gouaux E, 2013. X-ray structure of dopamine transporter elucidates antidepressant mechanism. Nature 503 (7474), 85–90. 10.1038/nature12533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Phillips PE, Stamford JA, 2000. Differential recruitment of N-, P- and Q-type voltage-operated calcium channels in striatal dopamine release evoked by ‘regular’ and ‘burst’ firing. Brain Res. 884 (1–2), 139–146. 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02958-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Prekeris R, Terrian DM, 1997. Brain myosin V is a synaptic vesicle-associated motor protein: evidence for a Ca2+-dependent interaction with the synaptobrevinsynaptophysin complex. J. Cell Biol 137 (7), 1589–1601. 10.1083/jcb.137.7.1589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Ramadhanti J, Yamada T, Yasui M, Nuriya M, 2021. Differentially regulated pools of aquaporin-4 (AQP4) proteins in the cerebral cortex revealed by biochemical fractionation analyses. J. Pharmacol. Sci 146 (1), 58–64. 10.1016/j.jphs.2021.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Robinson P, Etheridge S, Song L, Armenise P, Jones OT, Fitzgerald EM, 2010. Formation of N-type (Cav2.2) voltage-gated calcium channel membrane microdomains: lipid raft association and clustering. Cell Calcium 48 (4), 183–194. 10.1016/j.ceca.2010.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Ronzitti G, Bucci G, Emanuele M, Leo D, Sotnikova TD, Mus LV, Soubrane CH, Dallas ML, Thalhammer A, Cingolani LA, Mochida S, Gainetdinov RR, Stephens GJ, Chieregatti E, 2014. Exogenous α-synuclein decreases raft partitioning of Cav2.2 channels inducing dopamine release. J. Neurosci 34 (32), 10603–10615. 10.1523/jneurosci.0608-14.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Rowe J, Calegari F, Taverna E, Longhi R, Rosa P, 2001. Syntaxin 1A is delivered to the apical and basolateral domains of epithelial cells: the role of munc-18 proteins. J. Cell Sci 114 (Pt 18), 3323–3332. 10.1242/jcs.114.18.3323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Rudin D, Luethi D, Niello M, Yang J-W, Burger I, Sandtner W, Birner-Gruenberger R, Schütz GJ, Sitte HH, 2026. Cell membrane cholesterol affects serotonin transporter efflux due to altered transporter oligomerization. Mol. Psychiatr 31 (2), 963–975. 10.1038/s41380-025-03201-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Rust MB, Maritzen T, 2015. Relevance of presynaptic actin dynamics for synapse function and mouse behavior. Exp. Cell Res 335 (2), 165–171. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Salaün C, Gould GW, Chamberlain LH, 2005a. Lipid raft association of SNARE proteins regulates exocytosis in PC12 cells. J. Biol. Chem 280 (20), 19449–19453. 10.1074/jbc.M501923200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Salaün C, Gould GW, Chamberlain LH, 2005b. The SNARE proteins SNAP-25 and SNAP-23 display different affinities for lipid rafts in PC12 cells. Regulation by distinct cysteine-rich domains. J. Biol. Chem 280 (2), 1236–1240. 10.1074/jbc.M410674200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Sambo DO, Lebowitz JJ, Khoshbouei H, 2018. The sigma-1 receptor as a regulator of dopamine neurotransmission: a potential therapeutic target for methamphetamine addiction. Pharmacol. Therapeut 186, 152–167. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Sapoń K, Mańka R, Janas T, Janas T, 2023. The role of lipid rafts in vesicle formation. J. Cell Sci 136 (9). 10.1242/jcs.260887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Siciliano CA, Mauterer MI, Fordahl SC, Jones SR, 2019. Modulation of striatal dopamine dynamics by cocaine self-administration and amphetamine treatment in female rats. Eur. J. Neurosci 50 (4), 2740–2749. 10.1111/ejn.14437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Sulzer D, Cragg SJ, Rice ME, 2016. Striatal dopamine neurotransmission: regulation of release and uptake. Basal Ganglia 6 (3), 123–148. 10.1016/j.baga.2016.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Sun M, Kaplan SV, Gehringer RC, Limbocker RA, Johnson MA, 2014. Localized drug application and sub-second voltammetric dopamine release measurements in a brain slice perfusion device. Anal. Chem 86 (9), 4151–4156. 10.1021/ac5008927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Tarasenko AS, Sivko RV, Krisanova NV, Himmelreich NH, Borisova TA, 2010. Cholesterol depletion from the plasma membrane impairs proton and glutamate storage in synaptic vesicles of nerve terminals. J. Mol. Neurosci 41 (3), 358–367. 10.1007/s12031-010-9351-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Teixeira G, Vieira LB, Gomez MV, Guatimosim C, 2012. Cholesterol as a key player in the balance of evoked and spontaneous glutamate release in rat brain cortical synaptosomes. Neurochem. Int 61 (7), 1151–1159. 10.1016/j.neuint.2012.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Threlfell S, Mohammadi AS, Ryan BJ, Connor-Robson N, Platt NJ, Anand R, Serres F, Sharp T, Bengoa-Vergniory N, Wade-Martins R, Ewing A, Cragg SJ, Brimblecombe KR, 2021. Striatal dopamine transporter function is facilitated by converging biology of α-Synuclein and cholesterol. Front. Cell. Neurosci 15, 658244. 10.3389/fncel.2021.658244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Vitali C, Wellington CL, Calabresi L, 2014. HDL and cholesterol handling in the brain. Cardiovasc. Res 103 (3), 405–413. 10.1093/cvr/cvu148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Vošahlíková M, Roubalová L, Brejchová J, Alda M, Svoboda P, 2021. Therapeutic lithium alters polar head-group region of lipid bilayer and prevents lipid peroxidation in forebrain cortex of sleep-deprived rats. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1866 (9), 158962. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2021.158962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Voss LJ, van Kan C, Sleigh JW, 2013. Quantification of neocortical slice diffusion characteristics using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling. ISRN Neurosci 2013, 759640. 10.1155/2013/759640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Wang C, Tu J, Zhang S, Cai B, Liu Z, Hou S, Zhong Q, Hu X, Liu W, Li G, Liu Z, He L, Diao J, Zhu Z-J, Li D, Liu C, 2020. Different regions of synaptic vesicle membrane regulate VAMP2 conformation for the SNARE assembly. Nat. Commun 11 (1), 1531. 10.1038/s41467-020-15270-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Wang S, Neel AI, Adams KL, Sun H, Jones SR, Howlett AC, Chen R, 2023. Atorvastatin differentially regulates the interactions of cocaine and amphetamine with dopamine transporters. Neuropharmacology 225, 109387. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2022.109387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Wang D, Schreurs BG, 2010. Dietary cholesterol modulates the excitability of rabbit hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Neurosci. Lett 479 (3), 327–331. 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Warda M, Tekin S, Gamal M, Khafaga N, Çelebi F, Tarantino G, 2025. Lipid rafts: novel therapeutic targets for metabolic, neurodegenerative, oncological, and cardiovascular diseases. Lipids Health Dis. 24 (1), 147. 10.1186/s12944-025-02563-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Wasser CR, Ertunc M, Liu X, Kavalali ET, 2007. Cholesterol-dependent balance between evoked and spontaneous synaptic vesicle recycling. J. Physiol 579 (Pt 2), 413–429. 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.123133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Xia F, Leung YM, Gaisano G, Gao X, Chen Y, Manning Fox JE, Bhattacharjee A, Wheeler MB, Gaisano HY, Tsushima RG, 2007. Targeting of voltage-gated K+ and Ca2+ channels and soluble N-Ethylmaleimide-Sensitive factor attachment protein receptor proteins to cholesterol-rich lipid rafts in pancreatic α-Cells: effects on glucagon stimulus-secretion coupling. Endocrinology 148 (5), 2157–2167. 10.1210/en.2006-1296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Yorgason JT, España RA, Jones SR, 2011. Demon voltammetry and analysis software: analysis of cocaine-induced alterations in dopamine signaling using multiple kinetic measures. J. Neurosci. Methods 202 (2), 158–164. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Zeppelin T, Ladefoged LK, Sinning S, Periole X, Schiøtt B, 2018. A direct interaction of cholesterol with the dopamine transporter prevents its out-to-inward transition. PLoS Comput. Biol 14 (1), e1005907. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Zhang M, Augustine GJ, 2021. Synapsins and the synaptic vesicle reserve pool: floats or anchors? Cells 10 (3). 10.3390/cells10030658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1
Supplementary Material 2

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

RESOURCES