ABSTRACT
Species' habitat utilization reflects their habitat preferences and activity patterns. Understanding the coexistence mechanism of wild ungulates is critical for deciphering intra‐ and inter‐ species survival strategies. The interactions between species including predation, competition, symbiosis, and reproduction, are dynamic processes influenced by seasonal shifts, diel cycles, and weather variations. The Baotianman National Nature Reserve in northern China hosts diverse wild ungulate populations, yet their daily activity rhythms remain inadequately investigated. Leveraging camera‐trap data, we investigated the seasonal daily activity patterns of five sympatric wild ungulates (i.e., forest musk deer Moschus berezovskii , Siberian roe deer Capreolus pygargus, Reeve's muntjac Muntiacus reevesi , wild boar Sus scrofa, Chinese goral Naemorhedus griseus ), to assess temporal niche differentiation as a key coexistence mechanism. Comparative analyses revealed statistically significant seasonal differentiation in daily rhythms among these species. By Watson's U 2 test, the daily activity patterns differed significantly across forest musk deer, Reeve's muntjac, wild boar, and Chinese goral (p < 0.05). In contrast, the activity rhythms showed no significant differentiation between forest musk deer and Siberian roe deer. Notably, we found that forest musk deer, Siberian roe deer, and Reeve's muntjac were crepuscular, whereas wild boar and Chinese goral were diurnal. The highest degree of overlap coefficients was observed between the forest musk deer and the Siberian roe deer, with no significant difference in their diel activity rhythms. This study offers novel insights for developing conservation strategies for wild ungulates, and is crucial for maintaining ecological balance and biodiversity.
Keywords: camera‐traps, co‐occurrence patterns, daily rhythm, ecological niches, ungulates
Leveraging camera‐trap data, we investigated the seasonal daily activity patterns of five sympatric wild ungulates to assess temporal niche differentiation as a key coexistence mechanism. Comparative analyses revealed significant seasonal differentiation in daily rhythms among these species. By Watson's U 2 test, the daily activity patterns differed significantly across forest musk deer, Reeve's muntjac, wild boar, and Chinese goral (p < 0.05). We found that forest musk deer, Siberian roe deer, and Reeve's muntjac were crepuscular, whereas wild boar and Chinese goral were diurnal. The highest degree of overlap coefficients was observed between the forest musk deer and the Siberian roe deer (Δ = 0.90), with no significant difference in their diel activity rhythms (U 2 = 0.12, p > 0.01).

1. Introduction
The utilization of habitats by species reflects their preferences and activity patterns toward environmental factors (Chesson 2000; Wang et al. 2024). Interactions and influences among sympatric wild animal populations of different co‐occurring species operate on fine scales, and these dynamics directly shape species' behavioral patterns and resource utilization strategies (Franchini et al. 2023; Raimondi et al. 2023). Such interactions encompass diverse forms, including predation, competition, symbiosis, and reproduction, with their occurrence and variability closely tied to seasonal shifts, daily cycles, and weather fluctuations (Ikeda et al. 2016; Noor et al. 2017; Li et al. 2021). Investigating fine‐scale interactions provides critical insights into ecosystem complexity, facilitating the development of predictive models for ecological dynamics and targeted conservation strategies (Bu et al. 2016). Understanding the daily activity rhythms of different ungulate species can facilitate interspecific coexistence and enhance adaptive capacity, promote the efficient utilization of natural resources, and is of great significance for sustaining individual survival and population reproduction (Finke and Snyder 2008). Ungulates' activity rhythms are also shaped by interspecific competition and niche differentiation. Interspecific competition can induce overlapping activity rhythms among ungulates occupying the same niche (Gao et al. 2020; Bhasin et al. 2024; Raimondi et al. 2023), thereby mitigating resource competition pressure. Ecological niche differentiation, by contrast, spatiotemporally disperses the activity patterns of ungulates, further alleviating interspecific competitive stress (Darmon et al. 2012; Raimondi et al. 2023). Considerable variation in activity rhythms exists across ungulate species, which serves as a temporal niche partitioning mechanism enabling their peaceful coexistence within shared habitats. However, over recent decades, anthropogenic disturbances have imposed increasingly intense pressures on wildlife ecosystems (Gaynor et al. 2019; Orrick et al. 2024). The expansion and development of human societies have altered the habitats and activity schedules of wildlife, and modified the interaction dynamics between predators and prey (Gao and Susan 2023). Therefore, those current research topic of protecting wildlife and their ecological sustainability from human activities is particularly crucial.
Habitat selection and interspecific competition are key drivers of species abundance and distribution at the local scale (Hysen et al. 2025). The habitat and interspecific relationships of rare species require special attention, as biodiversity losses often occurs primarily through the disappearance of these species from regional assemblages (Guan et al. 2009). The forest musk deer ( Moschus berezovskii Flerov, 1929), a solitary ruminant endemic to southwestern China, is one of the five extant musk deer species globally. This species inhabits high‐altitude closed‐canopy coniferous and broad‐leaved mixed forests as a specialized ungulate. Due to its restricted distribution range and small population size (Ohtaishi and Gao 1990), it has been classified as a National First‐grade Protected Wild Animal in China and categorized as Endangered on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (Wang and Harris 2015). Forest musk deer, and Reeves's muntjac ( Muntiacus reevesi Ogilby, 1839) have similar habitat (Chen et al. 2024). According to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, both the Siberian roe deer ( Capreolus pygargus Pallas, 1771) and Reeves's muntjac are currently assessed as “Least Concern” (Lovari et al. 2016; Timmins and Chan 2016). In contrast, the Chinese goral ( Naemorhedus griseus Milne‐Edwards, 1871) is assessed as “Vulnerable” (Duckworth et al. 2008). The Siberian roe deer has a broad distribution across continental Asia and Eastern Europe. Its range extends westward from the Khoper River and Don River bend, eastward across the Ural Mountains and southern Siberia through northern Mongolia, and reaches its easternmost limit along coastlines regions of the East Sea, and the Yellow Sea basin, including the Korean Peninsula (Feng et al. 2021). Reeves's muntjac, a species of Muntiacus (Cervidae), is an endemic mammal of China. As the smallest muntjac, it is distributed across Mid‐Eastern China (Smith and Xie 2013). The Chinese goral is a small goat‐like animal (Ariyaraphong et al. 2021; Wu et al. 2024). Its distribution spans northern, central, southern and eastern China, with extensions to northeastern India, western Myanmar, northeastern Thailand. In China, it is classified as a National Second‐Class Protected Wild Animal and is listed in the CITES appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES 2021; www.cites.org). Additionally, the forest musk deer, Reeves's muntjac, Chinese goral, and Siberian roe deer are recorded in the Red List of Biodiversity in China: Vertebrate Volume 2020 (www.mee.gov.cn) with detailed assessment of their conservation status. The wild boar ( Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758) are the most widespread wild ungulate globally (Horčičková et al. 2019; Sales et al. 2017). Its current distribution covers all continents except Antarctica, rendering it one of the most widespread terrestrial mammals (Lewis et al. 2017). Renowned for their exceptional adaptability, wild boar exhibit the highest reproductive rate among ungulates, a key factor underpinning to their ecological success (Massei et al. 1997; Fonseca et al. 2011) classified as an invasive species in numerous regions, they pose significant threats, including agricultural crop damage, livestock disease transmission, vehicular collisions, and adverse impacts on native ecosystems (Guo et al. 2017).
Infrared camera technology has become a widely adopted tool for monitoring and investigating of mammalian species resources in nature reserves worldwide (Zhang et al. 2014; Craig et al. 2022). This methodology offers distinct advantages in studying animal behavior rhythms. As it enables continuous and unrestricted data collection, reduces interference with animals, geographical constraints and limitations in field personnel availability, thereby ensures the data objectivity (Forrester et al. 2016; Ahumada et al. 2019). The activity rhythm of animals refers to species‐specific temporal patterns of behavioral intensity across diel and seasonal cycles, reflecting adaptive responses to environmental and ecological variables (Li et al. 2014; Xiao et al. 2022; Proudman and Allen 2026). These studies are crucial for understanding the behavioral patterns of animals and provide a scientific basis for formulating wildlife protection strategies, thereby supporting the implementation of more effective management and conservation measures (Xiao et al. 2023). By analyzing the daily activity rhythms of these ungulates, it is possible to better predict their needs to protect their habitats and intervene when necessary to reduce the adverse effects of human activities. Based on infrared camera data from April 2019 to December 2023 in Baotianman National Nature Reserve, this study analyzed five ungulates, including forest musk deer, Siberian roe deer, Reeve's muntjac, wild boar, and Chinese goral (Figure 1). We employed R software (Version 4.0.1) to analyze the activity rhythms of these animals (R Core Team 2025), which facilitates understanding the fine‐scale interactions among ungulate species in the study area. We hypothesized that these sympatric ungulates exhibit temporal niche differentiation to alleviate interspecific competition, and that their activity rhythms differ between warm and cold seasons. Specifically, we predicted that species with similar ecological characteristics would have higher temporal activity overlap, whereas the dominant species (wild boar) would exhibit more flexible activity patterns. Understanding how ungulates schedule their daily activities is key to grasping their ecological requirements and potential responses to external disturbances, and such analysis can provide a scientific foundation for developing effective conservation strategies and management practices for those species.
FIGURE 1.

Five sympatric wild ungulate species in Baotianman National Nature Reserve, Henan, China. (a) Forest musk deer Moschus berezovskii , (b) Reeve's muntjac Muntiacus reevesi, (c) Siberian roe deer Capreolus pygargus , (d) Chinese goral Naemorhedus griseus , (e) Wild boar Sus scrofa .
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
Baotianman National Nature Reserve (33°25 ~ 33°36′ N, 111°53′ ~ 112°04′ E) is located in Henan Province, China (Figure 2). Covering an area of approximately 9304 km2, the reserve spans an elevation range from 500 m to 1830 m. It has an average annual temperature of 15.1°C. The coldest month is January, with an average temperature of 1.5°C and an extreme minimum temperature of −14.8°C, while the hottest month is July, with an average of 27.8°C and reaching an extreme maximum of 41.2°C. The summer hot season lasts for 81.1 days, and the winter cold season persists for 73.6 days. The annual average precipitation is 886 mm (Ye and Liu 2017). The reserve is dominated by warm temperate deciduous broad‐leaved forests and mixed coniferous‐broadleaf forests, forming a typical forest ecosystem. As the cornerstone of regional ecological balance, the reserve's comprehensive transitional forest ecosystem provides critical habitats for rare wild animals and plants, plays a pivotal role in climate regulation, water conservation, and other ecological processes, and is highly difficult to restore once degraded. Additionally, scattered evergreen forest patches are distributed in low‐lying valley areas, composed of plant species such as Abies chensiensis Tiegh., Corylus chinensis Franch., Picea neoveitchii Mast., Cercidiphyllum japonicum Sieb. & Zucc., Emmenopterys henryi Oliv., Eucommia ulmoides Oliv., etc. These species enhance the seasonal dynamics and biodiversity of the reserve. Situated at the ecotone between the northern subtropical and warm temperate biogeographical zones, the region exhibits typical East Asian monsoon transitional climate characteristics, which create a diverse array of microhabitats and support high species richness (Yao et al. 2012; Ye and Liu 2017).
FIGURE 2.

Distribution of camera trapping sites across Baotianman National Nature Reserve (33°25′–33°36′ N, 111°53′–112°04′ E), Henan, China. Elevations ranging from approximately 720 m to 1750 m. A total of 63 camera traps for wild ungulate surveys. Green dots denote camera trap locations.
2.2. Data Collection
We conducted infrared camera‐trapping from March 2019 to December 2023 in Baotianman Nature Reserve, with placement prioritizing animal trails, foraging areas, water sources—habitats and spots frequently used by target species. We set up 63 camera traps (Bestguarder SG‐990 V, Nighthawk4, Shenzhen Siyuan Digital Technology Co. Ltd., Shenzhen, China) at different sites above sea level from 720 to 1750 m to survey wild ungulates. Generally, we fixed cameras on the trees at a height of 20–150 cm, facing animal tracks, water sources, natural salt lick sites, or resting sites. Camera sites were spaced at least 300 m apart from each other. Additionally, no baits were used in camera sites to capture the natural wildlife behavior (Raimondi et al. 2023). According to the unified survey plan of the biodiversity observation network, Baotianman National Nature Reserve and its surrounding areas were divided into 2 km × 2 km grids using ArcGIS 10.2. When planning observation sites, we conducted a comprehensive assessment to evaluate the vegetation types, elevation, anthropogenic environmental impacts, and wildlife distribution patterns of each grid unit. Finally, areas composed of 20 adjacent grids were selected as the geographic positioning reference for setting up infrared cameras. Then, we placed 63 infrared cameras within the target grid. During the investigation process, the researchers regularly collected data and inspected the infrared camera, replaced the storage card, and adjusted the camera's position appropriately. During the investigation period, the infrared camera was generally inspected and maintained every 3–6 months (Zhang et al. 2023). By ensuring the distribution of cameras in this way, we took into account not only ecological diversity, but also hotspots of human and animal activities, thus enabling more effective wildlife population monitoring.
2.3. Data Analysis
At each camera placement site station, photographic and video data were systematically categorized by geographic location, hourly interval, and date. To ensure statistical independence of wildlife capture events, consecutive photograph records of conspecific individuals captured within 30‐min intervals were consolidated into a single occurrence event, and for all subsequent analyses, only independent detections were included (Li et al. 2010, 2020; Caravaggi et al. 2017). The number of effective camera trap days was calculated following standard protocols (O'Connell et al. 2011). For each camera, the effective survey days were defined as the total duration from the date of successful installation to either the date when the camera ceased operation (e.g., battery failure, malfunction, or memory card full) or the date of retrieval at the end of the study period. In cases where the exact cessation date could not be directly verified from camera logs or maintenance records—such as when cameras were lost or damaged—we conservatively estimated the end date as the date of the last captured photograph or video as a surrogate (O'Connell et al. 2011). The total effective camera trap days for the study were then calculated as the sum of effective days across all cameras. Since the recorded clock time of species detections lacks inherent biological significance, we converted the clock time of independent events to solar time using the sunrise and sunset time each day at the coordinates of the center of the reserve (Sogliani et al. 2025). All the solar times were treated as part of a 24‐h cycle.
Researchers performed a quantitative analysis of the diel activity patterns of the five ungulate species using the “overlap” package in R (Meredith and Ridout 2024). To determine whether each species exhibited random activity patterns (Viviano et al. 2021), the study further employed the HR_test function in the CircMLE package to conduct the Herman‐Larson test (Fitak and Johnsen 2017). Test results indicated that all species except the Chinese goral exhibited non‐random diel activity patterns (p < 0.001). This finding indicates that the activity rhythms of the other four species (forest musk deer, Siberian roe deer, Reeves's muntjac, and wild boar) are not randomly generated but are jointly regulated by intrinsic physiological requirements (such as the inherent cycles of foraging, reproduction, and rest) and environmental factors (such as temperature, light availability, predator activity, and resource distribution). Conversely, the random diel activity pattern observed in the Chinese goral (p = 0.215) may be linked to anthropogenic disturbances.
We compiled independent detection events for five wild ungulates species, with the time and date recorded based on the first photograph of each independent event. To assess interspecific differences in diel activity patterns, we generated a null distribution of temporal overlap indices by resampling with replacement from the pooled data set. This study employed Watson's Two‐Sample U 2 Test to assess the significance of activity pattern differences, both between species and between the cold seasons (i.e., October to March) and warm seasons (i.e., April to September) within each species, with a significance level set at p = 0.05 (Zar 2010). To further examine seasonal variations in temporal niche overlap, we also classified the study period into four meteorological seasons based on local climatic characteristics: spring (March–May), summer (June–August), autumn (September–November), and winter (December–February).
Relative abundance index (RAI) was calculated based on independent valid photographs using the formula: RAI = (Ai/N) × 100 where Ai denotes the number of independent valid photos of species i (i = 1,2,3,… corresponding to the five ungulate species), and N represents the total number of independent valid photographs. RAI is expressed as a percentage, reflecting the relative abundance of each species in the study area.
We calculated temporal niche overlap coefficients (Δ) for the five ungulate species across four distinct seasons. The Δ metric quantifies the degree of temporal niche overlap between species, with values ranging from 0 to 1: Δ value of 0 indicates no overlap, while a value of 1 indicates complete overlap.
Following the classification criteria established from previous studies (Monterroso et al. 2014; Sogliani et al. 2021), the degree of temporal niche overlap between species was categorized into four levels: “very low overlap” (Δ ≤ 0.35), “low overlap” (0.35 < Δ ≤ 0.50), “moderate overlap” (0.5 < Δ ≤ 0.75), and “high overlap” (Δ > 0.75). To evaluate the statistical reliability of the overlap coefficients, we employed the bootstrap resampling method (10,000 replicates; Meredith and Ridout 2024) to estimate the 95% confidence intervals (hereafter referred to as 95% CI) of the Δ for each species of pair. Since the temporal overlap coefficient is solely a descriptive statistic and does not have an associated significance test for pairwise comparisons (Monterroso et al. 2014), we further conducted the Mardia‐Watson‐Wheeler test (W‐) using the “circular” package in R (Mori et al. 2021) to statistically assess whether significant differences in diel activity times existed between pairwise combinations of five ungulate species: forest musk deer, Siberian roe deer, Reeve's muntjac, wild boar, and Chinese goral.
To accurately analyze biologically meaningful activity patterns, we converted the recorded clock times of all independent detection events to true solar time, calculated specifically for the geographic coordinates of each camera trap location. We used Package suncalc (Version 0.5.0) in R (Version 3.6.1) to estimate time of complete darkness and sunrise on the study site. We derived precise sunrise and sunset times for the date and location of each observation. We then calculated the hourly time difference between each animal detection and these daily solar events. Based on these solar‐referenced intervals, we categorized each observation into one of four distinct temporal phases: “around sunrise” (1 h post‐sunrise to 1 h pre‐sunrise), “around sunset” (1 h pre‐sunset to 1 h post‐sunset), “daytime” (1 h post‐sunrise to 1 h pre‐sunset), and “nighttime” (1 h post‐sunset to 1 h pre‐sunrise). This operational definition for classifying diel activity phases is well‐established in wildlife ecology (Rowcliffe et al. 2015; Proudman and Allen 2026).
Diel phenotype classification: Based on the solar‐defined intervals above, We adopted the analytical framework developed by Gerber et al. (2024), a model‐based hypothesis framework implemented in the Diel.Niche R package, to quantify diel activity phenotypes of focal species via its online Shiny platform (https://shiny.uri.edu/bgerber/DielNiche/). Analyses were run under the General hypothesis set, which assesses the statistical support for standard diel phenotypes based on species' utilization of each diel period and distinguishes bimodal from trimodal activity modalities. The raw data and code used in this study can be found in Table S1 and Code.docx.
3. Results
Over the study period, 63 camera trap sites amassed 155,011 trap‐days, resulting 4377 independent ungulates detection. Species‐specific detection counts were as follows: forest musk deer 351 (8.0%), Siberian roe deer 124 (2.8%), Reeve's muntjac 1584 (36.1%), wild boar 1923 (43.9%), and Chinese goral 395 (9.0%).
3.1. Single‐Species Seasonal Relative Activity Intensity
The seasonal relative activity intensity (warm vs. cold season) of the five ungulate species is presented in the Figure 3. Forest musk deer and Reeves's muntjac exhibited higher relative daily activity intensity during twilight hours in cold and warm seasons, while notably lower intensity during other periods. The Siberian roe deer displayed elevated activity levels between 5:00 and 10:00 (24‐h clock) in both seasons, with reduced intensity during the remainder of the diel cycle. Wild boar maintained relatively stable daily activity levels throughout the diel cycle across both seasons. For the Chinese goral, warm‐season activity intensity was noticeably higher during daytime, whereas in the cold season, activity exhibited more irregularly fluctuations—a pattern potentially driven by temperature variations.
FIGURE 3.

Distribution of camera trapping sites across Baotianman National Nature Reserve (33°25′–33°36′ N, 111°53′–112°04′ E), Henan, China. Elevations ranging from approximately 720 m to 1750 m. A total of 63 camera traps for wild ungulate surveys. Green dots denote camera trap locations.
3.2. Seasonal Daily Activity Patterns
The seasonal daily activity patterns of five ungulate species (Figure 4) and their statistical significance (Table 1): forest musk deer and Reeves's muntjac exhibited crepuscular activity patterns. During the warm season, both species displayed two distinct activity peaks (dawn and dusk). In the cold season, however, the crepuscular activity intensity of the forest musk deer diminished, with its peak activity shifting earlier. While Reeves's muntjac also showed reduced crepuscular activity with a noticeable shift toward later times.
FIGURE 4.

The seasonal daily activity patterns of five ungulate species in Baotianman National Nature Reserve. Blue lines denote the cold season, and red lines denote the warm season. The y‐axis is the “Kernel Density Estimates”.
TABLE 1.
The seasonal daily activity patterns of five sympatric wild ungulates in Baotianman, China during March 2019 to December 2023. Overlap coefficients of species in the cold and warm seasons.
| Species | Overlap coefficient | CI | p | U 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forest musk deer | 0.88 | 0.77–0.91 | 0.26 | 0.06 |
| Siberian roe deer | 0.80 | 0.60–0.83 | 0.096 | 0.15 |
| Reeve's muntjac | 0.86 | 0.81–0.88 | < 0.01 | 0.29 |
| Wild boar | 0.87 | 0.83–0.90 | < 0.01 | 0.48 |
| Chinese goral | 0.81 | 0.73–0.86 | < 0.01 | 0.32 |
The Siberian roe deer was primarily diurnal and crepuscular. It displayed a clear bimodal pattern in the warm season, with peaks following sunrise and preceding sunset. Although the activity peaks were less pronounced in the cold season, their timing shifted later compared to the warm season. Wild boar exhibited diel activity throughout the 24‐h cycle, with higher intensity during daytime than nighttime. Compared to the cold season, the species increased pre‐sunrise activity during the warm season while reducing post‐sunset activity. The Chinese goral was mainly diurnal. Its peak activity occurred around noon in the warm season, shifting to the afternoon during the cold season.
3.3. Annual Scale Daily Activity Rhythms
The annual‐scale daily activity patterns of five ungulate species in Baotianman National Nature Reserve are shown in Figure 5. The Chinese goral displayed distinct diurnal activity, with a prominent activity peak between 12:00 and 15:00. The forest musk deer, Reeves's muntjac, and Siberian roe deer all exhibited clear bimodal activity patterns, characterized by elevated activity during crepuscular hours (dawn and dusk). This behavioral strategy likely enables them to avoid midday heat and reduce predation risk. Notably, the wild boar population was significantly larger than those of the Chinese goral, forest musk deer, Reeves's muntjac, and Siberian roe deer. Its activity pattern was more clearly compared to the other four species: a morning activity peak occurred between 7:00 and 10:00, followed by a decline in activity from 10:00 to 15:00. Activity intensity increased again after 15:00, reaching the highest peak at approximately 18:00, and then gradually decreased thereafter. Despite the reduced activity frequency post‐18:00, the overall activity level of the wild boar population remained relatively high throughout the nighttime.
FIGURE 5.

Annual scale daily activity rhythms of five ungulate species in Baotianman National Nature Reserve. The y‐axis is the “Kernel Density Estimates”.
3.4. Temporal Niche Overlap Among Species
To investigate temporal niche partitioning among five ungulate species, we calculated pairwise temporal niche overlap coefficients using data collected from March 2019 to December 2023 (Figure 6 and Table 2).
FIGURE 6.

Daily activity patterns and temporal overlapped different pairs of five wild ungulate species. Overlaps are represented by the shaded gray area. The y‐axis is the “Kernel Density Estimates”. Overlap coefficients (∆) are shown in brackets.
TABLE 2.
Daily activity patterns of five sympatric wild ungulates were analyzed using data collected from March 2019 to December 2023 at Baotianman, China, and pairwise temporal niche overlap coefficients among these species.
| Species pairs | Overlap coefficient | CI | p | U 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forest musk deer, Siberian roe deer | 0.90 | 0.79–0.92 | 0.46 | 0.12 |
| Forest musk deer, Reeve's muntjac | 0.79 | 0.73–0.83 | < 0.01 | 1.99 |
| Forest musk deer, Wild boar | 0.81 | 0.76–0.83 | < 0.01 | 1.49 |
| Forest musk deer, Chinese goral | 0.73 | 0.67–0.77 | < 0.01 | 1.92 |
| Siberian roe deer, Reeve's muntjac | 0.86 | 0.77–0.89 | 0.014 | 0.31 |
| Siberian roe deer, Wild boar | 0.85 | 0.76–0.89 | < 0.01 | 0.31 |
| Siberian roe deer, Chinese goral | 0.79 | 0.69–0.83 | < 0.01 | 0.54 |
| Reeve's muntjac, Wild boar | 0.85 | 0.82–0.88 | < 0.01 | 1.09 |
| Reeve's muntjac, Chinese goral | 0.84 | 0.79–0.87 | < 0.01 | 0.46 |
| Wild boar, Chinese goral | 0.88 | 0.83–0.91 | < 0.01 | 0.53 |
The highest degree of overlap coefficients was observed between the forest musk deer and the Siberian roe deer (Δ = 0.90), with no significant difference in their diel activity rhythms (U 2 = 0.12, p > 0.01). Although the forest musk deer exhibited high overlap coefficients with Reeves's muntjac, wild boar, and Chinese goral (Δ > 0.75), their diel activity rhythms differed significantly (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the diel activity patterns of Siberian roe deer differ significantly from those of Reeves's muntjac, wild boar, and Chinese goral (p < 0.05). Significant differences (p < 0.01) were also detected between Reeves's muntjac and wild boar, Reeves's muntjac and the Chinese goral, as well as between the wild boar and the Chinese goral.
3.5. Analysis of Diel Activity Patterns
Examination of diel time budgets revealed distinct activity allocation patterns among the five ungulate species. Forest musk deer, Siberian roe deer, and Reeve's muntjac exhibited pronounced crepuscular activity peaks (Figure 5), characterized by clear bimodal patterns at dawn and dusk. However, despite these pronounced peaks, their overall activity was distributed throughout the day. Our model outputs provided strong statistical evidence that forest musk deer exhibit a diurnal–nocturnal activity phenotype. We obtained moderate support (model probability > 0.75) for a diurnal–nocturnal pattern in Siberian roe deer, Reeve's muntjac, and wild boar, whereas Chinese goral were classified as cathemeral (Table 3). Our findings partially contradict previous published results (Cox et al. 2021): prior work defined forest musk deer as strictly nocturnal, Siberian roe deer, Reeve's muntjac, and wild boar as cathemeral, and Chinese goral as crepuscular. This seeming contradiction arises from our definition of twilight as the narrow one‐hour windows before and after sunrise and sunset. While these short windows capture the most intense peaks of crepuscular activity, the activity during the broader dawn and dusk periods extends beyond these strict boundaries, falling into daytime and nighttime categories. These divergent diel activity patterns reflect their distinct ecological niches and adaptive strategies.
TABLE 3.
Detection frequencies of five sympatric wild ungulates in Baotianman, China during March 2019 to December 2023, and posterior model probabilities of support from the general hypothesis set. Crep, Crepuscular; Diur, Diurnal; Noct, Nocturnal.
| Species | Day | Twilight | Night | Diurnal | Nocturnal | Crepuscular | Cathemeral | Diur‐Crep | Diur‐Noct | Crep‐Noct |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forest musk deer | 169 | 19 | 163 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| Siberian roe deer | 55 | 11 | 58 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.86 | 0.00 |
| Reeve's muntjac | 695 | 159 | 730 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.75 | 0.00 |
| Wild boar | 646 | 189 | 1088 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.84 | 0.00 |
| Chinese goral | 157 | 45 | 193 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.00 |
4. Discussion
Investigating the activity patterns and time allocation of wildlife is essential for formulating science‐based conservation strategies for multiple species within protected areas. This study revealed the five wild ungulate species in Baotianman National Nature Reserve (forest musk deer, Siberian roe deer, Reeves's muntjac, wild boar, and Chinese goral) exhibited high pairwise temporal niche overlap (Δ > 0.75). Notably, the wild boar emerged as the dominant species, with a relative abundance significantly higher than that of the other four species. These findings suggest that the wild boar population was overly abundant and shared overlapping habitats with the coexisting ungulates. Therefore, it is recommended that targeted management measures be implemented to regulate the growth of the wild boar population within the reserve.
Since infrared cameras had a consistent detection probability for ungulates, the frequency of independent photographic records was used to infer their activity intensity (Wen et al. 2020). Furthermore, investigating daily activity rhythms is widely recognized as crucial for understanding animals' ecological behavioral strategies, as well as interspecific relationships (Linkie and Ridout 2011; Chen, Shu, and Xiao 2019). Our results indicate that the forest musk deer, Siberian roe deer, and Reeves's muntjac exhibited annual bimodal activity patterns, with their peak activities concentrated around dawn and dusk. In contrast, the wild boar displayed two less distinct activity peaks and maintained relatively stable activity throughout the day. The Chinese goral, however, showed a unimodal pattern, with its activity peak primarily occurring during daytime. This suggests potential temporal niche partitioning among these sympatric ungulate species.
As illustrated in Figure 4, both the forest musk deer and the Reeves's muntjac exhibited two distinct activity peaks in both warm and cold seasons, consistently occurring around dawn and dusk. This aligns with the findings of Wang et al. (2024). However, compared to the cold season, the dusk activity peaks for both species shifted later in the warm season. Notably, the dawn peak for forest musk deer also shifted later, whereas that of Reeves's muntjac shifted earlier. This indicates seasonal temporal niche differentiation between the two species. Siberian roe deer showed two clear activity peaks in the warm season, but these peaks became less distinct and shifted later in the cold season. These observation suggest that temperature is likely a key factor influencing their daily activity patterns, supporting the conclusions of Banjade et al. (2023). Collectively, these results highlight the critical role of temperature in driving seasonal shifts in the daily activity patterns of Siberian roe deer.
Previous studies have characterized the wild boar's activity pattern as cathemeral, lacking distinct activity peaks (de Assis et al. 2020), a finding corroborated by our data. Considering the seasonal variation in wild boar diets (Lee and Lee 2019), the observed seasonal variations in their daily activity rhythms are likely associated with fluctuations in food availability. For the Chinese goral, a clear unimodal pattern was observed during the warm season, whereas its activity in the cold season became more consistent and lower than the warm‐season peak. This pattern may be linked to energy requirements, ambient temperature, and adaptive survival strategies.
Temporal niche partitioning is likely an evolutionary strategy to reduce competition for limited resources. The five ungulate species exhibited moderate overlap in their daily activity patterns, with the highest overlap (Δ = 0.90) recorded between the forest musk deer and Siberian roe deer. Although both species are primarily crepuscular, their peak activity times within these periods differ significantly. This suggests that they achieved ecological separation and stable coexistence by utilizing food resources at different heights (Deng et al. 2020; Zhang 2014). Potential interspecific competition appeared more intense between Reeves's muntjac and the Chinese goral, as they shared similar diets niches (Hu et al. 2025; Tang et al. 2019) and exhibited highly overlapping activity patterns. The Reeves's muntjac displayed a typical bimodal pattern active at dawn and dusk, while the Chinese goral exhibits a unimodal pattern concentrated in the daytime. Thus, temporal niche differentiation likely mediates interspecific competition between these two species (Tian et al. 2020; Chen, Xiao, et al. 2019; Li et al. 2014). As the largest‐bodied and only omnivorous ungulate in Baotianman National Nature Reserve, wild boar occupies a dominant position in resource acquisition and habitat utilization (Wang et al. 2024). Activity rhythm analysis confirmed significant temporal niche partitioning between wild boars and other ungulates. This differentiation effectively alleviates interspecific competition and serves as a key mechanism promoting stable coexistence within the ungulate community (Lashley et al. 2018; Hearn et al. 2018; Karanth et al. 2017). However, the relatively high overlap coefficients (Δ > 0.8) between wild boars and other ungulates indicated potential competition for food resources. When necessary, management practices should include enhanced ecological monitoring, optimized population regulation strategies, and habitat management. Adjustments to spatial distribution patterns and targeted dietary resource management may also facilitate species coexistence (Guo et al. 2024).
In conclusion, temporal niche partitioning is recognized as a crucial driver of sympatric coexistence in ungulates. These findings provide a scientific basis for the conservation adaptive management of wild ungulate populations in Baotianman National Nature Reserve and similar temperate forest ecosystems.
Author Contributions
Zhaohui Xie: conceptualization (lead), data curation (equal), formal analysis (equal), funding acquisition (equal), investigation (equal), methodology (equal), project administration (lead), resources (equal), supervision (lead), writing – original draft (equal). Song Yao: data curation (equal), investigation (equal), resources (equal). Liangfu Chen: conceptualization (equal), data curation (equal), funding acquisition (equal), investigation (equal), resources (equal). Tongzhou Wang: data curation (equal), investigation (equal), investigation (equal), resources (equal), resources (equal). Tong Liu: data curation (equal), investigation (equal), resources (equal). Yang Zheng: methodology (equal), validation (equal), visualization (equal). Liwen Zhu: data curation (supporting), formal analysis (equal), software (supporting). Guangyi Lu: conceptualization (equal), data curation (equal), investigation (equal), methodology (equal), software (equal), visualization (equal).
Funding
This study was supported by the Project of Research on the Habitat of Forest Musk Deer in Baotianman National Nature Reserve, Neixiang, Henan Province (K‐H2024192, K‐H2024102).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Data S1: Supporting information.
Data S2: Supporting information.
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to the members of the group at the School of Life Science and Bioengineering, Henan University of Urban Construction, for their great help in writing and revising my paper. To the staff of Baotianman National Nature Reserve for their contribution to this camera‐trapping survey. Thanks to our reviewers for taking time out of their busy schedules to provide comments on this paper.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supporting Information.
References
- Ahumada, J. A. , Fegraus E., Birch T., et al. 2019. “Wildlife Insights: A Platform to Maximize the Potential of Camera Trap and Other Passive Sensor Wildlife Data for the Planet.” Environmental Conservation 47: 1–6. 10.1017/S0376892919000298. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ariyaraphong, N. , Pansrikaew T., Jangtarwan K., et al. 2021. “Introduction of Wild Chinese Gorals Into a Captive Population Requires Careful Genetic Breeding Plan Monitoring for Successful Long‐Term Conservation.” Global Ecology and Conservation 28: e01675. 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01675. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Banjade, M. , Jeong Y. H., Jin S. D., et al. 2023. “Spatiotemporal Overlap Between Siberian Roe Deer ( Capreolus pygargus Tianschanicus) and Sympatric Mammalian Species on Jeju Island, South Korea.” Mammalia 87, no. 2: 101–109. 10.1515/mammalia-2022-0059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bhasin, A. , Ghosal S., Ra I. D., Raina P., Shrivastava A., and Hore U.. 2024. “Wild Ungulates Employ Spatio‐Temporal Niche Partitioning to Coexist With Livestock in Resource‐Limited Trans‐Himalayan Rangelands, India.” Journal for Nature Conservation 82: 126743. 10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126743. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bu, H. , Wang F., McShea W. J., Lu Z., Wang D., and Li S.. 2016. “Spatial Co‐Occurrence and Activity Patterns of Mesocarnivores in the Temperate Forests of Southwest China.” PLoS One 11, no. 10: e0164271. 10.1371/journal.pone.0164271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caravaggi, A. , Banks P. B., Burton C., et al. 2017. “A Review of Camera Trapping for Conservation Behaviour Research.” Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 3, no. 3: 109–122. 10.1002/rse2.48. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen, L. J. , Shu Z. F., and Xiao Z. S.. 2019. “Using Infrared Camera Data to Study Animal Activity Rhythms: A Case Study of Galliformes in Chebaling National Nature Reserve, Guangdong Province.” Biodiversity Science 27, no. 3: 266–272. (In chinese). 10.17520/biods.2018226. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y. , Xiao Z., Zhang L., Wang X., Li M., and Xiang Z.. 2019. “Activity Rhythms of Coexisting Red Serow and Chinese Serow at Mt. Gaoligong as Identified by Camera Traps.” Animals 9, no. 12: 1071. 10.3390/ani9121071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Z. , Peng K., Lv X., et al. 2024. “Effects of Free‐Ranging Livestock on Occurrences and Interspecific Interactions of a Wildlife Community in a Temperate Forest.” Global Ecology and Conservation 50: e02826. 10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e02826. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chesson, P. 2000. “Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 31, no. 1: 343–366. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- CITES . 2021. “CITES.” http://cites.org.
- Cox, D. T. C. , Gardner A. S., and Gaston K. J.. 2021. “Diel Niche Variation in Mammals Associated With Expanded Trait Space.” Nature Communications 12: 1753. 10.1038/s41467-021-22023-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Craig, P. C. , David A. E. S., Yvette E. S., and Colleen T. D.. 2022. “Camera Trap Research in Africa: A Systematic Review to Show Trends in Wildlife Monitoring and Its Value as a Research Tool.” Global Ecology and Conservation 40: e02326. 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02326. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Darmon, G. , Calenge C., Loison A., Jullien J. M., Maillard D., and Lopez J. F.. 2012. “Spatial Distribution and Habitat Selection in Coexisting Species of Mountain Ungulates.” Ecography 35: 44–53. 10.1111/.1600-0587.2011.06664.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- de Assis, M. T. , da Rosa C. A., Viana‐Junior A. B., Santos A. P., Passamani M., and de Azevedo C. S.. 2020. “The Influence of Population‐Control Methods and Seasonality on the Activity Pattern of Wild Boars ( Sus scrofa ) in High‐Altitude Forests.” Mammalian Biology 100, no. 1: 101–106. 10.1007/s42991-019-00003-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Deng, Y. P. , Peng J. J., Peng J., et al. 2020. “Preliminary Investigation on Feeding Habits of Moschus berezovskii in Jinfo Mountain National Nature Reserve in Chongqing.” Journal of Chongqing Normal University (Natural Science) 37: 27–34 (In Chinese With English Abstract). 10.11721/cqnuj20200316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Duckworth, J. W. , Steinmetz R., and Rattanawat C.. 2008. “Naemorhedus griseus.”
- Feng, H. , Li Y., Li Y., et al. 2021. “Identifying and Evaluating the Ecological Network of Siberian Roe Deer ( Capreolus pygargus ) in Tieli Forestry Bureau, Northeast China.” Global Ecology and Conservation 26: e01477. 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01477. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Finke, D. L. , and Snyder W. E.. 2008. “Niche Partitioning Increases Resource Exploitation by Diverse Communities.” Science 321, no. 5895: 1488–1490. 10.1126/science.1160854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fitak, R. R. , and Johnsen S.. 2017. “Bringing the Analysis of Animal Orientation Data Full Circle: Model‐Based Approaches With Maximum Likelihood.” Journal of Experimental Biology 220, no. 21: 3878–3882. 10.1242/jeb.167056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fonseca, C. , Da Silva A. A., Alves J., Vingada J., and Soares A. M.. 2011. “Reproductive Performance of Wild Boar Females in Portugal.” European Journal of Wildlife Research 57, no. 2: 363–371. 10.1007/s10344-010-0441-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Forrester, T. , O'Brien T., Fegraus E., et al. 2016. “An Open Standard for Camera Trap Data.” Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e10197. 10.3897/BDJ.4.e10197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Franchini, M. , Atzeni L., Lovari S., et al. 2023. “Spatiotemporal Behavior of Predators and Prey in an Arid Environment of Central Asia.” Current Zoology 69, no. 6: 670–681. 10.1093/cz/zoac093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao, V. D. , Morley‐Fletcher S., Maccari S., Vitaterna M. H., and Turek F. W.. 2020. “Resource Competition Shapes Biological Rhythms and Promotes Temporal Niche Differentiation in a Community Simulation.” Ecology and Evolution 10, no. 20: 11322–11334. 10.1002/ece3.6770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao, Y. , and Susan G. C.. 2023. “An Interdisciplinary Conception of Human‐Wildlife Coexistence.” Journal for Nature Conservation 73: 126370. 10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126370. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gaynor, K. M. , Brown J. S., Middleton A. D., Power M. E., and Brashares J. S.. 2019. “Landscapes of Fear: Spatial Patterns of Risk Perception and Response.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 34, no. 4: 355–368. 10.1016/j.tree.2019.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gerber, B. D. , Devarajan K., Farris J., and Fidino M.. 2024. “A Model‐Based Hypothesis Framework to Define and Estimate the Diel Niche via the‘Diel.Niche’ R Package.” Journal of Animal Ecology 93: 132–146. 10.1111/1365-2656.14035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guan, T. L. , Zeng B., Peng Q. K., Yue B. S., and Zou F. D.. 2009. “Microsatellite Analysis of the Genetic Structure of Captive Forest Musk Deer Populations and Its Implication for Conservation.” Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 37, no. 3: 166–173. 10.1016/j.bse.2009.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guo, R. , Tong G. P., Zhang N. Z., et al. 2024. “Temporal Niche Relationships Among Cervus Nippon Kopschi and Sympatric Ungulates in Zhejiang Qingliangfeng National Nature Reserve.” Acta Theriologica Sinica 44, no. 4: 456. (In Chinese). 10.16829/j.skb.150843. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guo, W. , Cao G., and Quan R. C.. 2017. “Population Dynamics and Space Use of Wild Boar in a Tropical Forest, Southwest China.” Global Ecology and Conservation 11: 115–124. 10.1016/j.gecco.2017.04.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hearn, A. J. , Cushman S. A., Ross J., Goossens B., Hunter L. T., and Macdonald D. W.. 2018. “Spatio‐Temporal Ecology of Sympatric Felids on Borneo. Evidence for Resource Partitioning?” PLoS One 13, no. 7: e0200828. 10.1371/journal.pone.0200828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horčičková, E. , Brůna J., and Vojta J.. 2019. “Wild Boar ( Sus scrofa ) Increases Species Diversity of Semidry Grassland: Field Experiment With Simulated Soil Disturbances.” Ecology and Evolution 9, no. 5: 2765–2774. 10.1002/ece3.4950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu, X. , Yang J., Liu X., et al. 2025. “Activity Rhythms and Grouping Behaviors of Muntiacus reevesi Based on Infrared Camera Technology.” Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences 53, no. 14: 78–82. (In Chinese With English Abstract). 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2025.14.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hysen, L. , Wan H. Y., Jantz P., Gagnon J., and Cushman S. A.. 2025. “Variability in Habitat Selection Between Herds for a Widespread Ungulate.” Ecological Modelling 501: 110991. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110991. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ikeda, T. , Uchida K., Matsuura Y., et al. 2016. “Seasonal and Diel Activity Patterns of Eight Sympatric Mammals in Northern Japan Revealed by an Intensive Camera‐Trap Survey.” PLoS One 11, no. 10: e0163602. 10.1371/journal.pone.0163602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karanth, K. U. , Srivathsa A., Vasudev D., Puri M., Parameshwaran R., and Kumar N. S.. 2017. “Spatio‐Temporal Interactions Facilitate Large Carnivore Sympatry Across a Resource Gradient.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284, no. 1848: 20161860. 10.1098/rspb.2016.1860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lashley, M. A. , Cove M. V., Chitwood M. C., et al. 2018. “Estimating Wildlife Activity Curves: Comparison of Methods and Sample Size.” Scientific Reports 8, no. 1: 4173. 10.1038/s41598-018-22638-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S. M. , and Lee E. J.. 2019. “Diet of the Wild Boar ( Sus scrofa ): Implications for Management in Forest‐Agricultural and Urban Environments in South Korea.” PeerJ 7: e7835. 10.7717/peerj.7835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis, J. S. , Farnsworth M. L., Burdett C. L., Theobald D. M., Gray M., and Miller R. S.. 2017. “Biotic and Abiotic Factors Predicting the Global Distribution and Population Density of an Invasive Large Mammal.” Scientific Reports 7, no. 1: 44152. 10.1038/srep44152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li, J. , Xue Y., Hacker C. E., et al. 2021. “Projected Impacts of Climate Change on Snow Leopard Habitat in Qinghai Province, China.” Ecology and Evolution 11, no. 23: 17202–17218. 10.1002/ece3.8358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li, J. , Xue Y., Zhang Y., et al. 2020. “Spatial and Temporal Activity Patterns of Golden Takin ( Budorcas taxicolor bedfordi ) Recorded by Camera Trapping.” PeerJ 8: e10353. 10.7717/peerj.10353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li, S. , Mcshea W. J., Wang D. J., Shao L. K., and Shi X.. 2010. “The Use of Infrared‐Triggered Cameras for Surveying Phasianids in Sichuan Province, China.” Ibis 152, no. 2: 299–309. 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2009.00989.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li, S. , Wang D. J., Xiao Z. S., et al. 2014. “Camera‐Trapping in Wildlife Research and Conservation in China: Review and Outlook.” Biodiversity Science 22, no. 6: 685. (In Chinese with English abstract). 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.14203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Linkie, M. , and Ridout M. S.. 2011. “Assessing Tiger–Prey Interactions in Sumatran Rainforests.” Journal of Zoology 284, no. 3: 224–229. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00801.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lovari, S. , Masseti M., and Lorenzini R.. 2016. “ Capreolus pygargus.” The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T42396A22161884. 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T42396A22161884.en. [DOI]
- Massei, G. , Genov P. V., Sta()ines B. W., and Gorman M. L.. 1997. “Factors Influencing Home Range and Activity of Wild Boar ( Sus scrofa ) in a Mediterranean Coastal Area.” Journal of Zoology 242, no. 3: 411–423. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1997.tb03845.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Meredith, M. , and Ridout M. S.. 2024. “overlap: Estimate Overlap of Daily Activity Patterns.” R Package Version 4.0.1. https://CRAN.R‐project.org/package=overlap.
- Monterroso, P. , Alves P. C., and Ferreras P.. 2014. “Plasticity in Circadian Activity Patterns of Mesocarnivores in Southwestern Europe: Implications for Species Coexistence.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68, no. 9: 1403–1417. 10.1007/s00265-014-1748-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mori, E. , Paniccia C., Munkhtsog B., Cicero M., and Augugliaro C.. 2021. “Temporal Overlap Among Small‐ and Medium‐Sized Mammals in a Grassland and a Forest–Alpine Meadow of Central Asia.” Mammalian Biology 101, no. 2: 153–162. 10.1007/s42991-020-00085-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Noor, A. , Mir Z. R., Veeraswami G. G., and Habib B.. 2017. “Activity Patterns and Spatial Co‐Occurrence of Sympatric Mammals in the Moist Temperate Forest of the Kashmir Himalaya India.” Folia Zoologica 66, no. 4: 231–241. 10.25225/fozo.v66.i4.a4.2017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- O'Connell, A. F. , Nichols J. D., and Karanth K. U.. 2011. Camera Traps in Animal Ecology: Methods and Analyses. Vol. 271. Springer. 10.1007/978-1-4419-6598-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ohtaishi, N. , and Gao Y.. 1990. “A Review of the Distribution of All Species of Deer (Tragulidae, Moschidae and Cervidae) in China.” Mammal Review 20, no. 2–3: 125–144. 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1990.tb00108.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Orrick, K. D. , Ferraro K. M., and Sommer N. R.. 2024. “Individuals in Focus: Individuals as the Ecological and Ethical Center of Human‐Wildlife Conflict.” Biological Conservation 294: 110614. 10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110614. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Proudman, N. J. , and Allen M. L.. 2026. “Habitat Features, Coyotes (Canis latrans), and Humans Drive Diel Activity Variation Among Sympatric Mammals.” Integrative Zoology 21: 13000. 10.1111/1749-4877.13000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team . 2025. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r‐project.org/. [Google Scholar]
- Raimondi, F. , Sogliani D., Cimini M., Atzeni L., and Augugliaro C.. 2023. “Interference Competition Between Wild and Domestic Ungulates at Watering Sites of Gobi Desert, Mongolia.” Arid Ecosystems 13, no. 3: 305–313. 10.1134/S2079096123030101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rowcliffe, J. M. , Kays R., Kranstauber B., Carbone C., and Jansen P. A.. 2015. “Quantifying Levels of Animal Activity Using Camera Trap Data.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5, no. 11: 1170–1179. 10.1111/2041-210X.12278. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sales, L. P. , Ribeiro B. R., Hayward M. W., Paglia A., Passamani M., and Loyola R.. 2017. “Niche Conservatism and the Invasive Potential of the Wild Boar.” Journal of Animal Ecology 86, no. 5: 1214–1223. 10.1111/1365-2656.12721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith, A. T. , and Xie Y., eds. 2013. Mammals of China. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Sogliani, D. , Bignami L. A., Scabini E., et al. 2025. “Alien Allies? Temporal Ecology of Two Invasive Lagomorphs and Coexisting Predators in a Periurban Area.” Urban Ecosystems 28: 237. 10.1007/s11252-025-01850-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sogliani, D. , Cerri J., Turetta R., Crema M., Corsini M., and Mori E.. 2021. “Feral Rabbit Populations in a Peri‐Urban Area: Insights About Invasion Dynamics and Potential Management Strategies.” European Journal of Wildlife Research 67, no. 3: 60. 10.1007/s10344-021-01505-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tang, S. P. , Li C. H., Liu W., Wu L. J., and Bao W. D.. 2019. “Viability Analysis of Chinese Goral Population in Saihanwula National Nature Reserve, Inner Mongolia.” Scientia Silvae Sinica 55, no. 3: 118–124. (In Chinese With English Abstract). 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tian, C. , Zhang Y. Y., Liu Z. X., et al. 2020. “Temporal Niche Patterns of Large Mammals in Wanglang National Nature Reserve, China.” Global Ecology and Conservation 22: e01015. 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Timmins, J. , and Chan B.. 2016. “ Muntiacus reevesi.” The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016. e.T42191A170905827. 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-2.RLTS.T42191A170905827.en. [DOI]
- Viviano, A. , Mori E., Fattorini N., et al. 2021. “Spatiotemporal Overlap Between the European Brown Hare and Its Potential Predators and Competitors.” Animals 11, no. 2: 562. 10.3390/ani11020562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J. F. , Xu K., Yao S., et al. 2024. “Temporal Niche Partitioning Among Sympatric Wild and Domestic Ungulates Between Warm and Cold Seasons.” Scientific Reports 14, no. 1: 10570. 10.1038/s41598-024-61463-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y. , and Harris R.. 2015. “Moschus berezovskii.” The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015. e.T13894A103431781. 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T13894A61976926.en. [DOI]
- Wen, X. , Cheng X., Dong Y., Wang Q., and Lin X.. 2020. “Analysis of the Activity Rhythms of the Great Gerbil ( Rhombomys opimus ) and Its Predators and Their Correlations Based on Infrared Camera Technology.” Global Ecology and Conservation 24: e01337. 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01337. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wu, R. , Zhang X., Zhao J., Yi D., Gao F., and Bao W.. 2024. “Population Viability Analysis on Chinese Goral Indicates an Extinction Risk for a Local Population in Beijing, China.” Animals 14, no. 7: 1126. 10.3390/ani14071126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, W. H. , Li X. Y., Quan R. C., et al. 2023. “Construction of Sino BON Mammal Diversity Monitoring Network (Sino BON‐ Mammal): A 10‐Year Review and Future Outlook.” Biodiversity Science 31, no. 12: 23326. 10.17520/biods.2023326. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, Z. , Xiao W., Wang T., et al. 2022. “Wildlife Monitoring and Research Using Camera‐Trapping Technology Across China: The Current Status and Future Issues.” Biodiversity Science 30, no. 10: 22451. (In Chinese With English Abstract). 10.17520/biods.2022451. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yao, S. , Zhu X., Shu Q., et al. 2012. “Analysis on the Change Trends and Correlation of Temperature and Precipitation in Baotianman National Nature Reserve in Recent 15 Years.” Hubei Agriculture. Science 51, no. 3: 497–500. (In Chinese With English Abstract). 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2012.03.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ye, Y. , and Liu S.. 2017. Scientific Survey of Henan Baotianman National Nature Reserve, 1–12. Henan Science and Technology Press, (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Zar, J. H. 2010. Biostatistical Analysis. 5th ed, 944. Prentice‐Hall/Pearson. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, L. , Cui S., Huang Y., et al. 2014. “Infrared Camera Traps in Wildlife Research and Monitoring in China: Is‐Sues and Insights.” Biodiversity Science 22, no. 6: 696–703. (In Chinese With English Abstract). 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.14225. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Q. , Yao S., Xu K., et al. 2023. “Bird and Mammal Diversity Inventory by Camera Trapping in the Neixiang Baotianman National Nature Reserve Henan Province.” Acta Terologica Sinica 43, no. 2: 206–214. (In Chinese With English Abstract). 10.16829/j.slxb.150633. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, S. 2014. Study on the Home‐Range and Habitat Use by Siberian Roe Deer Under Predation Risk From Eurasian Lynx. Beijing Forestry University; (In Chinese With English Abstract). http://graduate.bjfu.eud.cn. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data S1: Supporting information.
Data S2: Supporting information.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supporting Information.
