Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2026 May 31;18(5):e109960. doi: 10.7759/cureus.109960

NDM-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Multidrug-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Bacteremia: A Report of Two Cases

Nikolaos Iason Davanellos 1,✉, Polyxeni Stefa 2, Rafail Giannas 1, Dimitrios Peichamperis 1, Despoina Paraskeva 3
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC13317049  PMID: 42382894

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as a major global healthcare challenge, significantly complicating the management of healthcare-associated infections and limiting available therapeutic options. We present two cases of severe bloodstream infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens in patients with prolonged healthcare exposure and multiple comorbidities. The first case involved urinary-source bacteremia caused by NDM (New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae exhibiting extensive AMR. Despite limited therapeutic options and apparent in vitro resistance, treatment with ceftazidime-avibactam was associated with marked clinical and laboratory improvement, resulting in clinical recovery and hospital discharge. The second case involved urinary-source bacteremia caused by multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium in an elderly patient with significant comorbidities and recent broad-spectrum antimicrobial exposure. Despite escalation of antimicrobial therapy and supportive management, the patient experienced progressive clinical deterioration and ultimately died. These cases highlight the substantial therapeutic challenges posed by highly resistant pathogens and emphasize the importance of early microbiological diagnosis, individualized interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility results, prompt optimization of antimicrobial therapy, and strict infection prevention measures in the management of severe multidrug-resistant infections.

Keywords: antimicrobial resistance, bloodstream infection, ceftazidime–avibactam, enterococcus faecium, extensively drug-resistant klebsiella pneumoniae, linezolid resistance, ndm carbapenemase, urosepsis

Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as one of the most significant global public health threats, contributing substantially to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs worldwide [1]. The rapid global dissemination of multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms has significantly complicated the management of hospital-acquired infections, particularly among critically ill or immunocompromised patients [2]. Recent epidemiological data have demonstrated a marked global increase in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), particularly in healthcare-associated infections among critically ill and heavily healthcare-exposed patients [3].

Among Gram-negative pathogens, Klebsiella pneumoniae has become one of the most clinically important causes of healthcare-associated infections. In particular, carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) represents a major therapeutic challenge due to resistance to multiple antimicrobial classes and its association with high mortality rates, especially in cases of bloodstream infection [4]. The introduction of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, including ceftazidime-avibactam, has expanded available therapeutic strategies for selected CRE infections and has demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes in several studies [5].

Meanwhile, Gram-positive pathogens remain a significant contributor to AMR in healthcare settings. Enterococcus faecium, particularly vancomycin-resistant strains (VRE), has emerged as a major cause of nosocomial infections, including bloodstream infections, urinary tract infections, and intra-abdominal infections [6]. Linezolid has traditionally been considered one of the most important therapeutic options for VRE infections; however, the emergence of linezolid-resistant enterococci represents an additional clinical challenge due to the limited availability of effective alternative therapies [7,8].

In this report, we present two cases of bloodstream infection caused by MDR pathogens managed in a secondary care hospital, illustrating the therapeutic challenges, microbiological complexity, and contrasting clinical outcomes associated with MDR Gram-negative and Gram-positive infections.

Case presentation

Two cases of severe infections caused by MDR pathogens were identified in patients hospitalized in a secondary care hospital.

Case 1

A 53-year-old female was admitted to the internal medicine department of a secondary care hospital due to reported fever. Her medical history was significant for arterial hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, chronic heart failure, and multiple recent cerebrovascular events resulting in severe neurological impairment and prolonged healthcare exposure. The patient had recurrent hospitalizations, a tracheostomy, enteral feeding through a nasogastric tube, chronic pressure ulcers, and an indwelling urinary catheter at the time of admission, all of which increased the risk for healthcare-associated MDR infections.

Upon admission, the patient had a temperature of 37.2°C, blood pressure of 139/95 mmHg, and heart rate of 93 beats per minute. Oxygen saturation was 85% on room air. Oxygen therapy with a Venturi mask delivering 50% fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) increased oxygen saturation to 99%, after which respiratory support was de-escalated to a nasal cannula at 5 L/min, maintaining adequate oxygenation.

Initial laboratory evaluation demonstrated markedly elevated inflammatory markers, severe hyperglycemia, anemia, elevated liver and cholestatic enzymes, and mildly elevated high-sensitivity troponin without ischemic electrocardiographic changes (Table 1).

Table 1. Evolution of laboratory parameters during hospitalization - case 1.

Laboratory parameters of case 1 at admission, during hospitalization, and at discharge, demonstrating changes in inflammatory markers, glycemic status, hematologic indices, and liver function following antimicrobial therapy.

Parameter Reference range Admission During hospitalization Discharge
White blood cells (×10⁹/L) 4-10 9.55 7.20 7.36
Neutrophils (%) 40-75 88.3 75 71
C-reactive protein (mg/L) <5 318 80 20.8
Procalcitonin (ng/mL) <0.05 5.6 1.15 0.15
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 12-16 10.6 7.8 9.2
Hematocrit (%) 36-46 34 25.8 30.1
Blood glucose (mg/dL) 70-140 416 220 140
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L) <35 534 22 12
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L) <45 931 96 16
Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) 40-130 365 202 181
γ-glutamyl transferase (U/L) <55 264 285 191
Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) 135-225 465 278 148
High-sensitivity troponin (pg/mL) <14 116 102 26

A computed tomography (CT) scan of the brain, chest, and abdomen was performed upon admission. Brain imaging demonstrated chronic ischemic and gliotic changes consistent with the patient’s known cerebrovascular disease. Abdominal imaging revealed gallbladder wall thickening exceeding 4 mm and a distended gallbladder containing intraluminal hyperdense content compatible with cholelithiasis (Figure 1). In addition, peripancreatic fat stranding and a small fluid collection in the hepatorenal recess (Morison’s pouch) were observed, supporting the presence of an intra-abdominal inflammatory process.

Figure 1. Abdominal CT findings in case 1.

Figure 1

Axial abdominal CT (soft tissue window) demonstrating gallbladder wall thickening (yellow arrow) and intraluminal hyperdense content within a distended gallbladder (white arrow), with imaging findings suggestive of acute cholecystitis.

Given the markedly elevated inflammatory markers and the suspicion of systemic infection, blood and urine cultures were obtained prior to the initiation of antimicrobial therapy. Empirical antimicrobial therapy with intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam was initiated upon admission at full therapeutic dosing.

Microbiological evaluation subsequently revealed growth of Klebsiella pneumoniae in both blood and urine cultures, consistent with bacteremia. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing demonstrated an MDR phenotype with resistance to multiple antimicrobial classes. The isolate was identified as an NDM (New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase) carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, exhibiting resistance to multiple antimicrobial classes, including carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, colistin, and piperacillin-tazobactam (Table 2). Notably, the organism also demonstrated in vitro resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam.

Table 2. Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of the isolates.

R: resistant; N/A: not available.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and interpretation were performed using automated microbiological methods according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints [9] and institutional microbiology laboratory protocols.

Antibiotic Klebsiella pneumoniae (Case 1) Enterococcus faecium (Case 2)
Ampicillin R R
Piperacillin-tazobactam R –
Ciprofloxacin R R
Levofloxacin R –
Gentamicin R R
Amikacin R –
Imipenem R –
Meropenem R –
Ertapenem R –
Colistin R –
Vancomycin – R
Teicoplanin – R
Linezolid – R
Tigecycline N/A R
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole R –
Ceftazidime-avibactam R –

Given the limited available therapeutic options and the patient’s severe clinical condition with prolonged healthcare exposure, antimicrobial therapy was modified on the third day of hospitalization to ceftazidime-avibactam combined with linezolid as salvage therapy, aiming to provide broad coverage for possible concomitant MDR Gram-positive pathogens while awaiting complete microbiological evaluation. Ceftazidime-avibactam treatment was continued for a total duration of eight days.

Following modification of antimicrobial therapy to a salvage regimen, the patient demonstrated rapid clinical improvement. Fever resolved shortly after modification of antimicrobial therapy. Inflammatory markers progressively improved during hospitalization, while leukocyte counts remained within normal limits throughout the hospital stay (Table 1).

During hospitalization, worsening anemia developed, requiring transfusion of one unit of packed red blood cells, after which hemoglobin levels stabilized (Table 1).

The total duration of hospitalization was 15 days, after which the patient was discharged in stable clinical condition.

Case 2

A 100-year-old male with multiple comorbidities was admitted to the internal medicine department of a secondary care hospital due to fever and progressive respiratory deterioration. The patient had been hospitalized 10 days prior for multiple rib fractures complicated by hemothorax, as well as lower respiratory tract infection, during which he received broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy with piperacillin-tazobactam. Recent hospitalization and broad-spectrum antimicrobial exposure represented significant risk factors for healthcare-associated MDR infection. His past medical history was notable for Parkinson’s disease.

Upon admission, the patient exhibited high fever (39.6°C) and severe hypoxemia. Oxygen therapy with a non-rebreather mask delivering 100% oxygen was required to maintain oxygen saturation around 92%. Vital signs revealed blood pressure of 121/84 mmHg and heart rate of 107 beats per minute. Blood and urine cultures were obtained on admission prior to the initiation of antimicrobial therapy.

Chest computed tomography (CT) performed upon admission demonstrated a large left-sided pleural fluid collection compatible with residual hemothorax and multiple rib fractures related to the recent traumatic injury (Figure 2). These findings were interpreted in the context of the patient’s recent hospitalization and underlying respiratory compromise.

Figure 2. Chest CT findings in case 2.

Figure 2

Axial chest CT in soft tissue window demonstrating a large left-sided pleural fluid collection compatible with residual hemothorax (yellow arrows) and associated rib fractures (white arrow).

Initial laboratory evaluation demonstrated marked inflammatory response with leukocytosis and neutrophilia, hypoalbuminemia, elevated D-dimer levels, and abnormal urinalysis findings, compatible with severe urinary tract infection (Table 3).

Table 3. Evolution of laboratory parameters during hospitalization - case 2.

Laboratory investigations of case 2 demonstrated persistent inflammatory activity and progressive clinical deterioration despite antimicrobial therapy.

Parameter Reference range Admission During hospitalization Final value
White blood cells (×10⁹/L) 4-10 15.07 12.97 17.65
Neutrophils (%) 40-75 83.1 90.3 89.6
C-reactive protein (mg/L) <5 138 281 330
Procalcitonin (ng/mL) <0.05 — 0.8 1.61
Urea (mg/dL) 15-50 71 54 50
Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.7-1.3 0.88 0.63 0.68
Albumin (g/dL) 3.5-5.0 2.9 2.8 2.9
Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L) 135-225 348 247 263
D-dimers (ng/mL) <500 2519 — —
Urine leukocytes (/high-power field) 0-5 30-40 Persistent pyuria —
Urine erythrocytes (/high-power field) 0-2 35-45 Persistent hematuria —

Urinalysis demonstrated persistent pyuria (30-40 leukocytes/high-power field (HPF)) and microscopic hematuria (35-45 erythrocytes/HPF) (Table 3). Although pyuria may be nonspecific in very elderly patients, particularly in the presence of urinary catheterization, the concurrent isolation of Enterococcus faecium from both urine and blood cultures supported a urinary source of bacteremia in the present case. The patient had an indwelling urinary catheter, and urine cultures also yielded Candida spp. Given the absence of candidemia, obstructive fungal lesions, or imaging findings suggestive of invasive fungal urinary tract infection, candiduria was interpreted cautiously and was considered more likely to reflect colonization associated with urinary catheterization, advanced age, and prolonged healthcare exposure rather than definite invasive fungal infection.

Empirical antimicrobial therapy with intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam was initiated on the first day of hospitalization. Due to clinical deterioration and microbiological findings, antimicrobial therapy was subsequently escalated to meropenem, linezolid, and fluconazole. Given the patient’s severe clinical deterioration, persistent fever, polymicrobial urinary findings, and concern for possible complicated urinary tract infection in the setting of prolonged urinary catheterization, broad-spectrum antimicrobial escalation with meropenem and adjunctive fluconazole was undertaken despite the uncertain pathogenic significance of candiduria.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the isolates from both blood and urine cultures revealed an MDR Enterococcus faecium phenotype, demonstrating resistance to multiple antimicrobial classes, including ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, and tigecycline (Table 2).

The total duration of hospitalization was six days, during which the patient demonstrated progressive clinical deterioration. Persistent elevation of inflammatory markers and leukocytosis with neutrophilia remained evident throughout hospitalization despite antimicrobial therapy (Table 3). Procalcitonin levels also remained elevated, supporting ongoing severe systemic infection.

Repeat blood and urine cultures obtained during hospitalization were negative, suggesting microbiological clearance. Nevertheless, the patient remained persistently febrile, with daily fever episodes and a maximum recorded temperature of 39.6°C. Respiratory support remained necessary, and oxygen therapy was continued with a Venturi mask and nasal cannula following initial stabilization.

Despite aggressive antimicrobial therapy and supportive management, the patient’s clinical condition progressively deteriorated, ultimately leading to death on the sixth day of hospitalization.

The main clinical characteristics, antimicrobial resistance profiles, therapeutic approaches, and outcomes of the two cases are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4. Clinical characteristics of the two cases.

Variable Case 1 Case 2
Age 53 years 100 years
Sex Female Male
Comorbidities Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, multiple strokes Parkinson’s disease, recent rib fractures with hemothorax
Healthcare exposure Recent ICU hospitalization and rehabilitation facility stay Recent hospitalization
Source of infection Urinary tract infection with bacteremia Urinary tract infection with bacteremia
Pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae Enterococcus faecium
Resistance phenotype Pandrug-resistant (PDR), NDM-producing isolate Multidrug-resistant
Initial therapy Piperacillin-tazobactam Piperacillin-tazobactam
Targeted therapy Ceftazidime-avibactam + linezolid Meropenem + linezolid + fluconazole
Clinical outcome Clinical improvement and discharge Death

Discussion

The global increase in infections caused by MDR and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) organisms represents a major challenge for modern clinical practice, particularly among patients with prolonged healthcare exposure and multiple comorbidities [10]. These infections are associated with increased mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and significant therapeutic limitations.

The first case describes bacteremia caused by an NDM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate exhibiting an XDR phenotype. CRKP has emerged as one of the most problematic pathogens in healthcare settings worldwide [11]. Among the various carbapenemases, the NDM is of particular concern due to its ability to hydrolyze most β-lactam antibiotics, including carbapenems, while remaining poorly inhibited by currently available β-lactamase inhibitors such as avibactam [12].

Infections caused by NDM-producing organisms are associated with extremely limited therapeutic options and high mortality rates [13]. Current treatment strategies are often based on combination regimens or salvage therapies, frequently guided by limited clinical evidence. Although current guidelines frequently recommend combination therapy with ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam for infections caused by NDM-producing Enterobacterales, synergy testing with aztreonam was not available in the present case, reflecting local diagnostic and therapeutic limitations frequently encountered in secondary care settings [14]. In this context, the management of infections caused by NDM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae remains particularly challenging.

Notably, in the present case, the patient demonstrated significant clinical improvement following the administration of ceftazidime-avibactam despite apparent in vitro resistance. Discordance between antimicrobial susceptibility testing and clinical response has been previously reported in the literature [15]. Several factors may contribute to this phenomenon, including pharmacodynamic effects, bacterial population heterogeneity, limitations of conventional susceptibility testing methods, and host-related factors, including immune response [16]. The decision to administer ceftazidime-avibactam despite documented in vitro resistance was based on the extremely limited therapeutic alternatives, the severity of infection, and the possibility that conventional susceptibility testing may not fully predict in vivo clinical response in selected cases. This observation is consistent with the well-described “90-60 rule” in clinical microbiology, whereby a proportion of infections caused by isolates reported as resistant may still demonstrate clinical response under specific clinical circumstances [17]. Similar discrepancies between microbiological susceptibility results and clinical outcomes have been previously described, supporting the importance of individualized clinical judgment in the management of severe MDR infections. However, interpretation of this observation should be cautious, as no additional molecular resistance testing or pharmacokinetic analyses were available to further explain the observed clinical response.

The second case illustrates the clinical difficulties associated with infections caused by MDR Enterococcus faecium. Enterococci are well-recognized nosocomial pathogens, particularly in patients with prolonged hospitalization, multiple comorbidities, and exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics [5]. Enterococcus faecium, in particular, has demonstrated a remarkable capacity to acquire resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents, significantly limiting available treatment options.

Enterococcal bacteremia is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, especially among elderly or critically ill patients [18]. Although candiduria in elderly catheterized patients frequently represents colonization rather than true invasive fungal infection, antifungal treatment may occasionally be considered in selected critically ill patients with persistent fever, significant clinical deterioration, extensive healthcare exposure, and polymicrobial urinary findings when invasive infection cannot be confidently excluded. In the specific case, despite the prompt initiation of broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy and subsequent escalation of treatment, the patient experienced progressive clinical deterioration and ultimately died. This unfavorable outcome highlights the poor prognosis frequently associated with severe infections caused by MDR enterococci in vulnerable patient populations.

Taken together, the two cases presented here illustrate the complexity of managing severe infections caused by highly resistant pathogens. While the first case demonstrates that salvage antimicrobial therapy may occasionally result in favorable outcomes even in the presence of extensive antimicrobial resistance, the second case highlights the substantial mortality risk associated with severe MDR infections in frail patients.

These cases emphasize the importance of early microbiological diagnosis, individualized interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility results, prompt optimization of antimicrobial therapy, and strict infection control measures in the management of severe MDR infections [19]. At the same time, the increasing prevalence of highly resistant pathogens underscores the urgent need for the development of novel antimicrobial agents and optimized therapeutic strategies.

Conclusions

MDR infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterococcus faecium remain associated with substantial therapeutic challenges and high mortality, particularly in patients with prolonged healthcare exposure and multiple comorbidities. These two cases highlight the importance of early microbiological diagnosis, careful interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility results, prompt optimization of antimicrobial therapy, and strict infection control measures. In addition, the observed clinical response despite apparent in vitro resistance in the first case underscores the complexity of managing severe MDR infections and the need for further research regarding optimal therapeutic strategies.

Disclosures

Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Nikolaos Iason Davanellos

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Nikolaos Iason Davanellos, Rafail Giannas, Dimitrios Peichamperis, Polyxeni Stefa, Despoina Paraskeva

Drafting of the manuscript:  Nikolaos Iason Davanellos

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Nikolaos Iason Davanellos, Rafail Giannas, Dimitrios Peichamperis, Polyxeni Stefa, Despoina Paraskeva

Supervision:  Nikolaos Iason Davanellos

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. [ May; 2026 ]. 2015. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241509763. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241509763 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2.Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators. Lancet. 2022;399:629–655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) Stockholm, Sweden: ECDC; 2025. Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales - Third Update. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: here is the storm! Nordmann P, Dortet L, Poirel L. Trends Mol Med. 2012;18:263–272. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Carbapenemases in Klebsiella pneumoniae and other Enterobacteriaceae: an evolving crisis of global dimensions. Tzouvelekis LS, Markogiannakis A, Psichogiou M, Tassios PT, Daikos GL. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25:682–707. doi: 10.1128/CMR.05035-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.The rise of the Enterococcus: beyond vancomycin resistance. Arias CA, Murray BE. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10:266–278. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Linezolid update: stable in vitro activity following more than a decade of clinical use and summary of associated resistance mechanisms. Mendes RE, Deshpande LM, Jones RN. Drug Resist Updat. 2014;17:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2014.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam: second-generation β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. van Duin D, Bonomo RA. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:234–241. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. 2025. https://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints https://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints
  • 10.Detection of a cfr(B) variant in German Enterococcus faecium clinical isolates and the impact on linezolid resistance in Enterococcus spp. Bender JK, Fleige C, Klare I, et al. PLoS One. 2016;11:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18:318–327. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30753-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Global spread of Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Nordmann P, Naas T, Poirel L. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:1791–1798. doi: 10.3201/eid1710.110655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Antibiotic treatment of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: systematic evaluation of the available evidence. Falagas ME, Lourida P, Poulikakos P, Rafailidis PI, Tansarli GS. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:654–663. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01222-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 guidance on the treatment of extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA, Mathers AJ, van Duin D, Clancy CJ. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;75:187–212. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Infections caused by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: differences in therapy and mortality in a multicentre study. Tumbarello M, Trecarichi EM, De Rosa FG, et al. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:2133–2143. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.The global epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. van Duin D, Doi Y. Virulence. 2017;8:460–469. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1222343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.The clinical predictive value (or lack thereof) of the results of in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility tests. Doern GV, Brecher SM. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:0–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Emerging incidence of Enterococcus faecium among hospital isolates (1993 to 2002) Treitman AN, Yarnold PR, Warren J, Noskin GA. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:462–463. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.1.462-463.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Federal funding for the study of antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial pathogens: no ESKAPE. Rice LB. J Infect Dis. 2008;197:1079–1081. doi: 10.1086/533452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES