Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2026 Apr 2;235(3):630–651. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2026.03.029

New biomarkers for the detection of fetal death derived from large-scale proteomic analysis of maternal plasma

Roberto ROMERO 1,2,3,4,*, Gaurav BHATTI 5,*, Tinnakorn CHAIWORAPONGSA 1,6, Nardhy GOMEZ-LOPEZ 1,5,7, Arun MEYYAZHAGAN 1,6,8, Piya CHAEMSAITHONG 1,9, Eunjung JUNG 1,10, Awoniyi O AWONUGA 6, Yeon Mee Kim 10, Dereje W Gudicha 1, Chong Jai KIM 11, David R BRYANT 6, Sonia S HASSAN 6,12,13, Adi L TARCA 5,6,14,*
PMCID: PMC13317154  NIHMSID: NIHMS2183574  PMID: 41935727

Abstract

Background:

Normal pregnancy involves modulation of thousands of maternal plasma proteins, and departures from the normal trajectories may be indicative of the development of adverse pregnancy outcomes. A decrease in placental growth factor (PlGF) and an increase in soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) in maternal plasma were shown to be associated with fetal death at the time of diagnosis and to predict this devastating pregnancy outcome at 24–28 weeks of gestation. However, these proteomic dysregulations are also present in other obstetrical syndromes, and more specific and sensitive biomarkers are needed to implement preventive strategies.

Objective:

To identify candidate protein biomarkers that can improve the prediction of fetal death relative to PlGF and sFlt-1.

Study Design:

This retrospective case-control study included 38 patients who experienced fetal death (cases) and 23 with uncomplicated pregnancy (controls). Plasma samples were collected at the time of diagnosis (20–41 weeks of gestation) from cases and during routine care from gestational-age-matched controls. An aptamer-based multiplex assay was used to measure the abundance of >7000 protein analytes. Differential protein abundance was assessed by using linear models with adjustment for gestational age at sample collection. Significance was inferred using moderated t-test adjusted p-value <0.1 and a fold-change >1.25. Hypergeometric tests were performed to identify gene ontology biological processes enriched among proteins with significant change in abundance. Random forest models were trained and evaluated via cross-validation to distinguish between fetal death cases and controls and to pinpoint the most salient predictors.

Results:

Among the 7146 protein assays tested, 97 assays (1.4%) corresponding to 87 unique proteins differed significantly in abundance between fetal death cases and controls: 63/87 proteins (72%) were less abundant and 24/87 (26%) were more abundant in fetal death cases. Dysregulated proteins were involved in pregnancy-related processes such as angiogenesis and lactation. Random forest models effectively differentiated fetal death cases from controls, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 72% for the combination of PlGF and sFlt-1, which increased to 86% when up to 50 additional proteins were included in the models (Delong’s test, p=0.004). The point estimate of sensitivity also increased from 53% to 74% (false-positive rate about 10% for both). Glycoprotein hormones alpha chain (CGA), DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 9 (DNAJB9), and DNA-directed RNA polymerase III subunit RPC10 (POLR3K), emerged as the top three candidates to improve discrimination relative to PlGF and sFlt-1. The significant proteomic changes in a subset of fetal death cases diagnosed first with preeclampsia relative to controls were highly correlated (r=0.78, p<0.001) with those we reported in cases of late preeclampsia leading to live births. In average, for each 2-fold change in protein abundance in late preeclampsia leading to live birth there was an 8.6-fold change in preeclampsia leading to fetal death. Despite this overall correlation, Transcobalamin-2 (TCN2), Glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase (G6PD) and Hepcidin (HAMP), among others, demonstrated dysregulation only in preeclampsia leading to fetal death, suggesting both shared and distinct pathways perturbed in the two syndromes.

Conclusion:

Our findings suggest that new maternal plasma proteins improve discrimination of fetal death from controls relative to known biomarkers, and that, although the signatures of fetal death and of preeclampsia are correlated, fetal death represents not only a much heightened disease state but also involves distinct perturbed pathways. Future studies will be needed to determine if the biomarkers predict fetal death.

Keywords: Angiogenesis, Aptamer, Biomarker, blood proteins, DNAJB9 protein, Hepcidin, fetal death, Glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase, Glycoprotein hormones alpha chain, high-throughput screening assay, Placental growth factor, Proteome, RNA polymerase III subunit C10, soluble fms like tyrosine kinase 1, Transcobalamin-2, Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1

Tweetable statement:

New candidate biomarkers for fetal death were identified with maternal blood large scale proteomics.

Introduction

Fetal death is a major public health problem with profound medical, emotional, and societal consequences. In the United States, approximately 57 fetal deaths occur each day, affecting more than 21,000 families annually.1 Worldwide, an estimated two million fetal deaths occur every year, representing a substantial and persistent global burden.2 The prevention and prediction of fetal death have been identified as national health care priorities. In July 2024, the United States Congress enacted the Stillbirth Prevention and Prediction Act, reflecting formal recognition of the need to improve risk identification and prevention strategies.3

Fetal death is generally defined as the cessation of fetal cardiac activity at or after 20 weeks of gestation or when the fetus weighs at least 350 grams, although definitions vary according to reporting requirements across states within the United States and among countries.4 Despite advances in obstetric care, the fetal mortality rate in the United States has remained largely unchanged over the past two decades.1 Substantial racial and ethnic disparities persist, with Black women experiencing significantly higher rates of fetal death than other groups.1, 5 These observations underscore the limitations of current clinical approaches and the need for improved biologically informed methods of risk assessment.

Fetal death fulfills the criteria of a great obstetrical syndrome6–10 in that it is characterized by: (1) multiple etiologies; (2) the presence of a preclinical phase during which pathological processes are active but clinically silent; (3) direct fetal involvement; (4) an adaptive nature, in which fetal demise may represent a response to an adverse intrauterine environment; and (5) modification of its occurrence by genetic and environmental factors.7, 8, 11 Accordingly, fetal death represents a final common pathway rather than a single disease entity. Documented etiologies include infections (e.g. syphilis,12, 13 listeriosis,14–16 group B streptococcus,17, 18 other bacterial infections,19 causing fetal sepsis20 and viral infections including parvovirus B1921–23 and cytomegalovirus);24, 25 placental vascular insufficiency26–32 (also known as ischemic placental disease);33–36 maternal anti fetal rejection;37–41 umbilical cord pathology (e.g. true knots,42–46 vasa previa47–49 and others44, 50); genetic anomalies;51–54 fetal cardiac arrhythmias,55–59 maternal metabolic disorders such as diabetes,60, 61 placental senescence62, 63 among others pathologic processes64. This framework provides a biologically coherent basis for understanding heterogeneity in pathogenesis.

Mechanistic investigations conducted by our group have demonstrated that, among structurally normal fetuses, hypoxia secondary to placental dysfunction accounts for the majority (88%) of fetal deaths.65 These studies further showed that fetal death is frequently preceded by fetal growth restriction,29, 66–73 evidence of myocardial injury, brain injury, or both, indicating that death commonly results from progressive pathophysiologic processes rather than sudden, unpredictable events.37, 65 These findings support the existence of a clinically silent preclinical phase during which biomarkers may identify pregnancies at increased risk.

Placental vascular disorders represent the most frequently identified pathological etiology in fetal death.26, 74, 75 Lesions consistent with maternal vascular malperfusion are commonly observed on placental examination, and fetal vascular malperfusion has also been implicated.26, 50, 74–79 In addition, placental lesions associated with maternal anti fetal rejection, including chronic chorioamnionitis, villitis of unknown etiology, and chronic deciduitis, have been described in stillbirth.26, 37, 39, 80, 81

Biomarkers reflecting placental vascular dysfunction, such as placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble fms like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1), have demonstrated potential in identifying pregnancies at increased risk.31, 82–88 Nonetheless, a proportion of fetal deaths occur in the absence of abnormal angiogenic profiles, indicating that critical pathogenic mechanisms remain unidentified. Accordingly, improving risk stratification requires interrogation of biological pathways beyond maternal vascular malperfusion. Maternal blood provides a unique window into the integrated biology of the placenta, fetus, and mother and may be conceptualized as a liquid biopsy of pregnancy.8 Systematic evaluation of changes in the maternal plasma proteome offers the opportunity to identify biomarkers reflective of diverse pathogenic processes and to complement existing tools (e.g. biomarkers such as alpha-fetoprotein,89, 90 PAPP-A,91 and others).

Prior investigations of maternal circulating proteins in fetal death have primarily employed targeted approaches, focusing on a limited number of analytes.31, 82–86, 92–96 High throughput technologies permit unbiased characterization of protein alterations associated with gestational age and obstetrical complications before and at the time of diagnosis.97–101 To date, a comprehensive large scale evaluation of the maternal plasma proteome in fetal death has not been performed. Therefore, in this study, we applied an aptamer based proteomic platform to quantify more than 7,000 protein analytes in maternal plasma samples obtained at the time of diagnosis of fetal death.102 Aptamers are chemically synthesized DNA/RNA molecules that bind protein targets with high affinity and specificity. The reliability and reproducibility of this platform have been established in maternal plasma, with low coefficients of variation and strong correlation with enzyme linked immunosorbent assay measurements for PlGF and sFlt-1.8, 98, 101 An earlier version of this platform was also used to identify placenta specific proteins released into the maternal circulation, supporting its suitability for the present investigation.103

The primary objective of this study was to identify maternal plasma proteins that improve discrimination beyond PlGF and sFlt-1 in cases of fetal death compared with gestational age matched controls. We hypothesized that this would be possible by screening over 7000 plasma proteins, including some which were never assayed in plasma of women who experienced fetal death. Identification of such markers is clinically relevant given evidence that in Great Obstetrical Syndromes (GOS) molecular abnormalities present at the time of diagnosis may also be detectable earlier in gestation.8, 83, 97, 100, 104 A secondary objective was to compare proteomic alterations in cases of fetal death associated with preeclampsia with those previously reported in late onset preeclampsia resulting in live birth using the same proteomic platform in the same population.105

Material and Methods

Study design and population

Pregnant women seeking care at the Center for Advanced Obstetrical Care and Research of the Pregnancy Research Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services in the Detroit Medical Center and Wayne State University were enrolled in a prospective study between 2010 and 2018. From this cohort, a retrospective case–control study was designed to include 38 women with fetal death (cases) and 23 controls. The lower number of controls than cases was decided based on the availability of a longitudinal proteomics dataset in normal pregnancy (n=91) obtained by the investigators in the same population using the same version of the SomaScan platfrom.101, 105 Controls were women who were enrolled in a longitudinal study in the same period as the cases (to avoid differences in sample storage time), had an pregnancy without major medical, surgical, or obstetrical complications, delivered an appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) neonate at term, and had one or more blood sample available in the 20–41 weeks interval. The blood samples from controls were selected so that they matched the distribution of cases in terms of gestational age at sampling. Women with a multiple gestation or with fetal chromosomal abnormalities and congenital anomalies were excluded from the study.

The collection of the clinical data and biological specimens from these women for research was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Wayne State University and the NICHD under the protocol entitled “Biological Markers of Disease in the Prediction of Preterm Delivery, Preeclampsia and Intra-Uterine Growth Restriction: A Longitudinal Study” (IRB# 110605MP2F) and Establishment of a Clinical Perinatal Database and Bank of Biological Materials (IRB#082403MP2F). All patients provided written informed consent prior to the collection of data and biospecimens.

Clinical definitions

Gestational age (GA) was determined by the self-reported last menstrual period and confirmed by ultrasound. If there was a discrepancy between the menstrual dating and the ultrasound findings, GA was determined solely by the ultrasound examination106. Fetal death was defined as fetal demise diagnosed at or after 20 weeks of gestation, as confirmed by ultrasound examination before the onset of labor107. Preeclampsia was defined as the onset of elevated blood pressure in the presence of proteinuria after 20 weeks of gestation, following the diagnostic criteria of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists108. A small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate was defined as having a birthweight percentile less than the 10th percentile for their specific gestational age at delivery by using the standard of Alexander et al109. An appropriate-for-gestational-age neonate was defined as having a birthweight between the 10th and 90th percentiles for their specific gestational age at delivery by using the standard of Alexander et al109.

Placental pathology

Following delivery, placental tissues were collected and subjected to thorough examination by perinatal pathologists blinded to the clinical diagnoses. The evaluation followed standardized protocols to ensure consistency and accuracy as we previously described26, 39, 80, 110–123. Placental lesions, including acute and chronic inflammatory lesions as well as lesions consistent with maternal and fetal vascular malperfusion were diagnosed based on established criteria set by the Perinatal Section of the Society for Pediatric Pathology112–125.

Maternal plasma collection

Blood samples were collected in tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and plasma was separated by centrifugation (1300g, 10 min). Plasma samples were immediately stored at −80 °C until proteomic analysis. For all cases with a fetal death, the samples were collected after diagnosis.

Large-scale proteomic analysis of maternal plasma

The study utilized the SomaScan assay v4.1, an aptamer-based platform, to measure the abundance of maternal plasma proteins.102, 126, 127 The platform allows to simultaneously quantify 7288 analytes, representing 6596 unique human protein targets, of which 7146 analytes (representing 6288 unique proteins) passed quality control and were retained for downstream analysis. The full list of proteins analyzed in this study is available from the Gene Expression Omnibus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), platform identifier: GPL32354. The proteomic profiling was conducted by SomaLogic, Inc. (Boulder, CO, USA). We previously reported that the median (Interquartile Range, IQR) of the coefficient of variation of the protein analytes was 7% (IQR 4.5%–11.4%), and the coefficient of variation was <20% for 93% of the assays.101 Our group has previously used the SomaScan platform to report on maternal plasma changes with advancing gestation during normal pregnancy98, 101, term parturition128, and pathologic processes such as early100 and late preeclampsia97 and Sars-CoV-2 infection129. Proteomic changes detected with different versions of the SomaScan platform were shown to be replicated across diverse cohorts105, 130.

SomaScan assay

Plasma samples undergo three sequential dilutions at ratios of 1:5, 1:200, and 1:20,000. These diluted samples are then incubated with specific SOMAmer mixes attached to streptavidin-coated beads, enabling the binding of proteins to their respective SOMAmer reagents. Subsequent washing removes nonspecifically bound proteins and other matrix constituents from the beads. An NHS-biotin reagent is then applied to label the proteins bound to the SOMAmer reagents. Following the labeling reaction, an anionic competitor solution is introduced to the beads, preventing nonspecific interactions from reforming after dissociation. Pure cognate SOMAmer complexes and unbound SOMAmer reagents are then separated from the streptavidin beads by using ultraviolet light, which cleaves the photo-cleavable linker present in the SOMAmer reagents. The resulting eluate contains excess anionic competitors and all SOMAmer reagents, including those bound to biotin-labeled proteins and to the free proteins. This eluate is subsequently incubated with a second set of streptavidin-coated beads that specifically bind to biotin-labeled proteins and the biotin-labeled protein–SOMAmer complexes. Free SOMAmer reagents are removed during additional washing steps. Under denaturing conditions, the SOMAmer reagents bound to their cognate proteins are released and then hybridized to custom DNA microarrays. The resulting cyanine-3 signal from the SOMAmer reagents is detected and quantified on the microarrays. The proteomics profiling was performed by SomaLogic, Inc. in July 2022 as a paid service.

Data Standardization

The SOMAscan assay employs rigorous data standardization steps to ensure accurate and consistent results.126, 127 First, hybridization normalization adjusts for variations in microarray binding. Next, intraplate signal normalization is applied using both Calibrator and Buffer (no protein) replicates, addressing plate-specific fluctuations. Then, plate scale standardization is combined with calibration, using a global calibrator reference. The signals of quality control (QC) replicates are normalized using a global reference, followed by a QC check that contrasts the median of these replicates with a specific global QC standard for the pooled QC lot present on the plate. Lastly, individual sample signals are standardized with an universal reference. Collectively, these procedures are designed to mitigate systematic biases emerging after microarray feature aggregation.

Demographics data analysis

Clinical characteristics and demographics of the study participants were summarized as the median and interquartile range for continuous variables and as proportions for categorical variables. The Welch’s t-test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables between groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The analysis was performed using the R statistical language and environment (www.r-project.org).

Principal components analysis for proteomics data visualization

To visualize the proteomic profiles and detect eventual outlier samples, we have use principal components analysis to project the high-dimensional proteomic data onto the first two principal components, which can be seen as independent (un-correlated) variables (meta-proteins) derived as a weighted combination of different subsets of proteins. The PCAtools package in R was used for this analysis.

Differential protein abundance analysis

The abundance of proteins, in relative fluorescence units, was log2 transformed and compared between groups (i.e. all fetal death vs controls, fetal death with preeclampsia vs controls, fetal death without preeclampsia vs controls) by fitting linear models implemented in the limma R/Bioconductor131 package, while adjusting for gestational age at sampling. A fold change ≥ 1.25 and a false discovery rate adjusted p-value (q-value) < 0.1 were used as thresholds to infer significance. Selecting proteins as significant based on q<0.1 alone would mean that, in average, 10% of the proteins identified as associated with fetal death are false discoveries, which is commonly accepted in omics studies128, 129, 132. Additionally requiring that the fold change is at least 1.25-fold further reduces the false discovery rate and increases the chance that the effect is biologically meaningful. The results of differential expression analysis were summarized and visualized with volcano plots and heatmaps, using the R/Bioconductor packages EnhancedVolcano and pheatmap, respectively.

In addition to the primary differential abundance analysis (38 fetal death vs 23 controls), we performed and expanded analysis to include 367 additional samples collected at 20–41 weeks from n=91 patients with normal pregnancy initially reported in Tarca et al.101 and later contrasted to preeclampsia cases in Andresen et al.105 The dupcor method from limma package was used to account for longitudinal samples from the same control patients. Before analysis, data was transformed into multiples of the mean values (log2 thereof) as previously described105. The goal of this secondary differential protein abundance analysis was to provide additional confidence in the primary analysis by capturing additional variability in the proteomes of normal pregnancy and better account for the effect of gestational age on proteome trajectories via longitudinal sampling.

Gene ontology enrichment analysis

To investigate the functional roles of proteins with altered abundance in cases of fetal death compared to controls, we performed gene ontology (GO)133 enrichment analysis. Each protein was mapped to its corresponding gene identifier in the Entrez gene database134 according to the annotation provided by SomaLogic. To identify biological processes overrepresented among the proteins significantly changing in abundance in fetal deaths versus controls, we used the hypergeometric test implemented in the R/Bioconductor package, clusterProfiler. Biological processes with at least three hits and an adjusted p-value <0.05 were deemed statistically significant.

Proteomic classifier for fetal death

Random forest models were employed to classify maternal plasma proteomic profiles between the patients with a fetal death and the controls. Random forests are an ensemble technique that creates multiple decision trees for classification and regression.135 Each tree functions as a flowchart, assigning samples to groups based on protein abundance cut-offs of specific proteins. By aggregating outcomes from all trees, the random forest method enhances predictive accuracy and minimizes biases inherent in single trees. Moreover, this approach provides a robust measure of multi-variate feature importance score, enabling the identification of key features impacting the overall decision-making.136 Feature importance is estimated by evaluating how a protein’s absence reduces the model’s accuracy.

A 20-fold cross-validation framework was implemented to assess the accuracy of two distinct types of models and, hence, provide internal validation of the findings. The first model utilized the angiogenic factor PlGF and the anti-angiogenic factor sFlt-1 for classification. This choice was based on their well-established value in predicting and distinguishing between fetal death cases and controls, thereby serving as a reference model31, 82–88. For the second model, in addition to PlGF and sFlt-1, we incorporated 50 additional proteins. These proteins were selected based on their feature importance scores, which were derived from a random forest analysis that considered all available proteins.

The 20-fold cross-validation process started with randomly splitting the patients into 20 folds. Next, in each iteration, the samples in one of the folds were set aside as a test set and the remaining samples were used to train an initial random forest classifier. From this preliminary model, the top 50 features (excluding PlGF and sFlt-1), ranked by their importance, were identified. These features, together with PlGF and sFlt-1, were then used to fit the final model that was applied to the test set. The model performance was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) by concatenating classification probabilities derived from each of the 20 test sets. The Delong’s method for paired receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was used to compare the two models.137 The ROC was plotted using the R package, pROC, and the R packages, random Forest and ranger, were used to fit the random forest models.

Cross-study validation

Since there was no other publicly available dataset in fetal death obtained using the same large-scale proteomics platform, we have sought to assess the reliability of findings herein based on results we previously reported in late preeclampsia based on samples from patients enrolled in the same clinical center105. Differential protein analysis in a subset of fetal death cases first diagnosed with preeclampsia (n=9) and all controls was performed as described above for the main analysis. Log2 fold changes of resulting significant proteins were correlated to those found in plasma samples collected between 30–41 weeks of gestation from 80 patients who developed late preeclampsia and 88 of the 91 controls who had an available sample in this window of gestation. Of the 80 preeclampsia cases, 49 were already diagnosed at the time of blood collection while 31 were diagnosed later in gestation. Pearson correlation coefficient and the slope of the regression line between the two studies was calculated.

To further assess external validity of data generated herein, proteins were ranked by variable importance on the entire fetal death and controls dataset, and the 50 top-ranked proteins were used to fit a random forest model. This model was then applied to data from the 80 patients diagnosed with late preeclampsia and 88 controls from Andresen et al.105 to estimate the posterior probability of fetal death for each sample. ROC curves and AUC statistics with 95% confidence intervals were obtained. Protein abundances in both datasets were first converted to gestational-age–adjusted multiples-of-the-mean (MoM) using the same procedure we previously described in cross-cohort studies105, 130.

Results

Demographics and clinical characteristics

The study included plasma samples from 38 women with a fetal death and 23 controls sampled in the same window of gestation. Among women with a fetal death, individual or combined pregnancy complications were noted: nine (24 %) were diagnosed with preeclampsia, 15 (39%) with an SGA neonate, four (10.5%) with both preeclampsia and SGA, three (8%) with clinical chorioamnionitis, and one (3%) had placental abruption. Additional underlining diseases in the fetal death group included diabetes mellitus (n=1, 3%), anemia (n=4, 11%), and asthma (n=4, 11%). Table 1 displays the demographics and clinical characteristics of the study participants between the two groups. Gestational age at delivery, birthweight and birthweight percentiles in the fetal death group were significantly lower than those in the control group (p < 0.001 for all). Although a reduction in growth velocity is known to precede a subset of cases destined to experience fetal death29, the 16% median birthweight percentile for cases is lower than the 21.5% estimate we have previously reported based on third trimester ultrasound29 and can be explained in part by the delay between fetal demise and delivery. Women with a fetal death were significantly older (p=0.023) and more likely to be smokers (p=0.022) than the controls. By study design, the median gestational age at sampling did not differ between the groups. Other variables, including body mass index, nulliparity, and ethnicity, also by design did not differ significantly between the groups.

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the women included in the study.

Continuous variables, summarized as medians (range), were compared using Welch’s t-test. Categorical variables, presented as number (%), were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test.

Characteristics Controls Cases of fetal death P
Maternal age (years) 23(19–32) 24(17–41) 0.023
BMI (kg/m2) 25.2(16.1–39) 27.1(18.1–50.5) 0.11
Race (African American) 20/23(87%) 34/38(89.5%) 1
Smoking 1/23(4.3%) 11/38(28.9%) 0.022
Alcohol consumption 0/23(0%) 1/38(2.6%) 1
Nulliparous 6/23(26.1%) 18/38(47.4%) 0.11
Gestational age at blood collection (weeks) 28.9(20.6–40.1) 26.8(20.1–40.9) 0.54
Gestational age at delivery (weeks) 38.9(37.7–41.1) 27(20.1–41.3) <0.001
Birth weight (g) 3350(2855–3960) 709(48–3235) <0.001
Birth weight percentile 45.3(25–80.5) 16(1–62) <0.001
Fetal sex (male)* 11/23(47.8%) 26/37(70.3%) 0.10

Table 2 describes the placenta histopathologic results of the study population. Placental weight was lower in cases than in controls (p<0.001). The prevalence of chronic inflammatory lesions in the placenta, as well as placental lesions consistent with maternal and fetal vascular malperfusion, was significantly higher in women with a fetal death compared to the controls (p < 0.001 for all). Table S1 provides patient level clinical and obstetrical characteristics and the placental histology of the women with fetal death.

Table 2. Placental pathology information of the study population.

Continuous variables, summarized as medians (range), were compared using Welch’s t-test. Categorical variables, presented as number (%), were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test.

Characteristics Controls Cases of fetal death P
Placenta weight (g) 543(414–817) 197(17–670) <0.001
Birth weight to placental weight ratio 6.4(4.1–7.2) 3.7(1.1–30.6) 0.07
Acute inflammatory lesions 4/23(17.4%) 12/38(31.6%) 0.25
 Maternal Inflammatory Lesions 3/23(13%) 10/38(26.3%) 0.34
 Fetal Inflammatory Lesions 4/23(17.4%) 3/38(7.9%) 0.41
Chronic inflammatory lesions 1/23(4.3%) 25/38(65.8%) <0.001
 Chronic Chorioamnionitis 0/23(0%) 10/38(26.3%) 0.01
 Chronic Villitis 0/23(0%) 2/38(5.3%) 0.52
 Chronic Deciduitis 1/23(4.3%) 24/38(63.2%) <0.001
Maternal vascular malperfusion 2/23(8.7%) 26/38(68.4%) <0.001
Fetal vascular malperfusion 0/23(0%) 24/38(63.2%) <0.001

Unsupervised analysis of the plasma proteome in cases of fetal death and controls

Of the 7,288 assays profiled in plasma samples, 7,146 (representing 6288 unique proteins) passed quality control and were retained for all downstream analyses. Principal component (PC) analysis was next conducted to examine the relation between the maternal plasma metaproteome and fetal death diagnosis. While PC1 and PC2, accounting for 21% and 8% of the variance respectively, did not demonstrate a significant correlation with group status (fetal deaths vs. controls, p > 0.05 for both), PC3 and PC5, which explained 7% and 4% of the variance respectively, showed a significant association with fetal death (p < 0.05). A separation between the samples from women with fetal death and controls is evident in Figure 1. This unsupervised analysis suggests differences in protein abundance between the two groups.

Figure 1: Principal component analysis of maternal plasma proteomic data.

Figure 1:

All samples are depicted as their first and second principal components derived from the maternal plasma protein abundance. The proportion of variance explained by each principal component is shown along the axis.

Differential protein abundance

Comparing 7146 maternal plasma protein assays between women with a fetal death and the controls, we observed a significant change in abundance for 97 SOMAmer targets (1.4%), corresponding to 87 unique proteins (Table S2). All 10 duplicate SOMAmers targeting the same significant proteins were consistent in terms of direction of change and had similar magnitude of change (Table S2). Of these 87 proteins, 24 proteins were more abundant, while 63 were less abundant in the fetal death group. This differential abundance is visualized in a volcano plot (Figure 2), contrasting log2 fold changes against significance q-values for all proteins and highlighting the significant ones. Additionally, a heatmap in Figure 3 shows the log2-transformed abundance (in relative fluorescence units) of these differentially abundant proteins across all samples, using a color gradient. When expanding the control group to include data from 91 additional patients, the resulting protein changes were highly correlated (Pearson R=0.95, p<0.001) and the direction of change remained the same for all 97 SOMAmer targets reported in the main analysis, and additional significant proteins were identified. We preferred not to focus on the expanded analysis results due to potential biases that can be introduced when combining the data from the current study with the dataset of Andresen et al. which did not include fetal death cases.

Figure 2: Volcano plot.

Figure 2:

The figure shows a volcano plot of log10 transformed adjusted p-values against log2 transformed fold changes of maternal plasma proteins (identified by corresponding gene symbols) significantly changing in abundance between fetal death cases and controls. The R/Bioconductor package, EnhancedVolcano, was used to generate the plot.

Figure 3: Heatmap of differentially abundant maternal plasma proteins.

Figure 3:

Heatmap depicting proteins, identified by their corresponding gene symbols, that showed significant differences in abundance between pregnancies complicated by fetal death and gestational age–matched controls. The heatmap was generated using the R/Bioconductor package pheatmap.

Adjusting for Body Mass Index (BMI) did not alter results; the direction of protein abundance changes remained consistent for all 97 differentially abundant targets, and the fold changes exhibited a perfect Pearson correlation of 1, regardless of BMI adjustment. Furthermore, the changes in abundance of the 97 SOMAmer targets obtained in the primary analysis were consistent and highly correlated regardless of diagnosis of preeclampsia among the fetal death cases (Pearson r=0.92, p<0.001, Figure S1). The one notable exception was Glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase (G6PD) which was highly decreased in fetal death with preeclampsia relative to controls (4.3-fold) but did not change in fetal death without preeclampsia, (Figure S1).

Differential protein abundance in women who experienced fetal death was associated with perturbation of 53 biological processes including angiogenesis, female pregnancy, lactation, and chemotaxis (FDR=5%) (Table 3).

Table 3. Biological process associated with plasma proteins differentially abundant in fetal deaths vs. controls.

List of biological processes over-represented among plasma proteins differentially abundant in fetal death cases compared to controls. For processes with at least three significant proteins, odds ratios and q-values from a Fisher’s exact test are provided. Also included are the corresponding gene symbols for these proteins and their direction of change in the fetal death group compared to controls.

Biological process No. of Proteins Odds Ratio q-value Decreased in Fetal Death Increased in Fetal Death
negative regulation of bone resorption 3 19.5 0.016 IAPP, TNFRSF11B HAMP
negative regulation of tissue remodeling 4 17.5 0.009 IAPP, TNFRSF11B, AGT HAMP
negative regulation of bone remodeling 3 16.2 0.023 IAPP, TNFRSF11B HAMP
regulation of bone resorption 4 11.4 0.016 IAPP, TNFRSF11B, CSF1R HAMP
regulation of kidney development 3 11.4 0.041 VEGFA, AGT, RET
lactation 3 10.8 0.042 DDR1, VEGFA, PRL
monocyte differentiation 3 10.8 0.042 VEGFA, CSF1R, CD74
regulation of positive chemotaxis 3 10.8 0.042 PGF, VEGFA, ANGPT2
positive regulation of morphogenesis of an epithelium 3 10.2 0.042 VEGFA, WNT5B, AGT
vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway 4 9.7 0.023 SEMA6A, PGF, VEGFA, IL12A|EBI3
macrophage cytokine production 3 9.7 0.043 SEMA7A, CD74, TGFB1
regulation of macrophage cytokine production 3 9.7 0.043 SEMA7A, CD74, TGFB1
regulation of bone remodeling 4 9.0 0.028 IAPP, TNFRSF11B, CSF1R HAMP
regulation of tissue remodeling 6 8.7 0.009 IAPP, TNFRSF11B, AGT, CSF1R, TGFB1 HAMP
bone resorption 4 7.9 0.036 IAPP, TNFRSF11B, CSF1R HAMP
body fluid secretion 4 7.5 0.041 STATH, DDR1, VEGFA, PRL
positive regulation of receptor signaling pathway via STAT 4 6.9 0.042 CSH1|CSH2, AGT, PRL, TGFB1
cellular response to vascular endothelial growth factor stimulus 4 6.7 0.042 SEMA6A, PGF, VEGFA, IL12A|EBI3
bone remodeling 5 6.2 0.035 IAPP, TNFRSF11B, CSF1R, TGFB1 HAMP
receptor signaling pathway via STAT 10 6.1 0.007 CSH1|CSH2, IL22RA2, CSF2RA, AGT, PRL, CSF1R, IL12A|EBI3, TGFB1, RET HAMP
receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STAT 9 5.7 0.009 CSH1|CSH2, IL22RA2, CSF2RA, AGT, PRL, CSF1R, IL12A|EBI3, RET HAMP
female pregnancy 8 5.3 0.014 DDR1, FBLN1, TEAD3, PGF, VEGFA, ANGPT2, AGT, PRL
negative regulation of angiogenesis 5 5.2 0.042 SEMA6A, CCN6, ANGPT2, AGT, PRL
negative regulation of blood vessel morphogenesis 5 5.2 0.042 SEMA6A, CCN6, ANGPT2, AGT, PRL
negative regulation of vasculature development 5 5.1 0.043 SEMA6A, CCN6, ANGPT2, AGT, PRL
positive regulation of leukocyte chemotaxis 5 5.1 0.043 PGF, VEGFA, CSF1R, CD74, IL12A|EBI3
multi-organism reproductive process 8 4.9 0.016 DDR1, FBLN1, TEAD3, PGF, VEGFA, ANGPT2, AGT, PRL
regulation of receptor signaling pathway via STAT 5 4.8 0.049 CSH1|CSH2, AGT, PRL, TGFB1, RET
multi-multicellular organism process 8 4.7 0.016 DDR1, FBLN1, TEAD3, PGF, VEGFA, ANGPT2, AGT, PRL
regulation of chemotaxis 9 4.5 0.016 SEMA6A, PGF, VEGFA, ANGPT2, SEMA7A, CSF1R, CD74, IL12A|EBI3, TGFB1
positive regulation of chemotaxis 6 4.2 0.043 PGF, VEGFA, CSF1R, CD74, IL12A|EBI3, TGFB1
tissue remodeling 6 4.1 0.049 IAPP, TNFRSF11B, AGT, CSF1R, TGFB1 HAMP
positive regulation of cell migration 15 3.6 0.009 CD274, CGA, SEMA6A, PGF, VEGFA, SEMA7A, WNT5B, GRN, AGT, CSF1R, MMP7, CD74, IL12A|EBI3, TGFB1, RET
regulation of angiogenesis 9 3.6 0.034 SEMA6A, PGF, VEGFA, CCN6, ANGPT2, GRN, AGT, PRL, CAMP
regulation of vasculature development 9 3.6 0.036 SEMA6A, PGF, VEGFA, CCN6, ANGPT2, GRN, AGT, PRL, CAMP
regulation of growth 14 3.5 0.012 CGA, DDR1, CSH1|CSH2, SEMA6A, VEGFA, SEMA7A, AGT, PRL, GDF15, TGFB1 FTO, CLSTN3, TNC, HAMP
regulation of developmental growth 8 3.5 0.042 CGA, SEMA6A, VEGFA, SEMA7A, PRL, GDF15 FTO, HAMP
positive regulation of cell motility 15 3.4 0.010 CD274, CGA, SEMA6A, PGF, VEGFA, SEMA7A, WNT5B, GRN, AGT, CSF1R, MMP7, CD74, IL12A|EBI3, TGFB1, RET
positive regulation of locomotion 15 3.4 0.011 CD274, CGA, SEMA6A, PGF, VEGFA, SEMA7A, WNT5B, GRN, AGT, CSF1R, MMP7, CD74, IL12A|EBI3, TGFB1, RET
gland development 10 3.3 0.036 CGA, IGSF3, DDR1, VEGFA, PRL, CSF1R, TGFB1, PSAP TNC, HAMP
transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathway 15 3.0 0.016 DDR1, CSH1|CSH2, SEMA6A, PGF, VEGFA, SVEP1, APOD, ANGPT2, AGT, CSF1R, GDF15, IL12A|EBI3, TGFB1, RET EPHA10
peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylation 11 3.0 0.039 DDR1, CSH1|CSH2, VEGFA, IL22RA2, AGT, CSF1R, CD74, IL12A|EBI3, TGFB1, RET EPHA10
peptidyl-tyrosine modification 11 3.0 0.041 DDR1, CSH1|CSH2, VEGFA, IL22RA2, AGT, CSF1R, CD74, IL12A|EBI3, TGFB1, RET EPHA10
negative regulation of developmental process 17 2.8 0.016 CGA, STATH, FBLN1, IAPP, SEMA6A, VEGFA, TNFRSF11B, CCN6, ANGPT2, SEMA7A, PRTG, AGT, PRL, GDF15, CD74, TGFB1 SRSF6
developmental growth 12 2.8 0.042 CGA, DDR1, SEMA6A, VEGFA, APOD, SEMA7A, AGT, PRL, GDF15, PSAP FTO, HAMP
regulation of cell migration 18 2.7 0.016 CD274, CGA, SEMA6A, PGF, VEGFA, APOD, ANGPT2, SEMA7A, WNT5B, GRN, AGT, CSF1R, MMP7, CD74, IL12A|EBI3, TGFB1, RET TNC
regulation of anatomical structure morphogenesis 17 2.7 0.022 FBLN1, SEMA6A, PGF, VEGFA, TNFRSF11B, CCN6, ANGPT2, SEMA7A, WNT5B, GRN, AGT, PRL, CSF1R, CAMP, TGFB1, RET LST1
growth 16 2.7 0.023 CGA, DDR1, CSH1|CSH2, SEMA6A, VEGFA, APOD, SEMA7A, AGT, PRL, GDF15, TGFB1, PSAP FTO, CLSTN3, TNC, HAMP
tube morphogenesis 16 2.7 0.027 DDR1, AIMP1, SEMA6A, PGF, VEGFA, APOD, CCN6, ANGPT2, GRN, AGT, PRL, CSF1R, CAMP, IL12A|EBI3, TGFB1, RET
blood vessel morphogenesis 13 2.7 0.042 AIMP1, SEMA6A, PGF, VEGFA, APOD, CCN6, ANGPT2, GRN, AGT, PRL, CAMP, IL12A|EBI3, TGFB1
angiogenesis 12 2.7 0.042 AIMP1, SEMA6A, PGF, VEGFA, APOD, CCN6, ANGPT2, GRN, AGT, PRL, CAMP, IL12A|EBI3
positive regulation of cell population proliferation 17 2.5 0.036 CD274, CGA, INSL4, PGF, VEGFA, CSF2RA, GRN, AGT, PRL, CSF1R, CD74, CAMP, IL12A|EBI3, TGFB1 TNC, SRSF6
vasculature development 14 2.5 0.042 AIMP1, SEMA6A, PGF, VEGFA, SVEP1, APOD, CCN6, ANGPT2, GRN, AGT, PRL, CAMP, IL12A|EBI3, TGFB1

The maternal plasma proteome can discriminate between fetal deaths and controls

We observed the differential abundance of several proteins not previously reported in the plasma of women with a fetal death. Based on these findings, we postulated that integrating these unstudied proteins into proteomic models might enhance the accuracy in distinguishing cases of fetal death from controls. To test this hypothesis, we trained random forest classification models with maternal plasma protein concentrations and evaluated their discriminative power using 20-fold cross-validation. As a benchmark, we employed a model based on the plasma abundance of PlGF and sFlt-1 (model 1) to determine the potential improvement upon incorporation of additional proteins (model 2).

The 20-fold cross-validated area-under-the-curve (AUC) that differentiated between fetal death cases and controls using model 1 was 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59–0.84; Figure 4a), reflecting moderate accuracy. With a 10% false-positive rate (FPR), the sensitivity of model 1 was 52.6% (95% CI: 31.6%–71.1%). After incorporating 50 additional proteins (model 2), the AUC increased to 0.86 (95% CI: 0.77–0.95; Figure 4a). The increase in model 2’s AUC was deemed statistically significant by a one-sided comparison of correlated ROC curves via Delong’s method (p=0.004).137 Additionally, model 2 displayed an enhanced sensitivity of 74% (57%−87%) at a 8.7% FPR corresponding likelihood ratio positive of 8.47 (2.22–32.29) and likelihood ratio negative of 0.29 (0.17–0.5). Of note, the addition of prior risk factors (maternal age, nulliparity, body mass index, history of preterm birth, history of preeclampsia, and chronic hypertension) in the proteomics model, only increased the AUC for prediction of fetal death from 0.86 to 0.87(0.78–0.95), and outperformed prior risk factors alone [AUC=0.70(0.55–0.84), p=0.044, DeLong test).

Figure 4. Maternal plasma proteome can distinguish fetal deaths from controls.

Figure 4.

a) Receiver operating characteristic curves for classifying maternal plasma samples into fetal death and controls. b) Bar plot displaying the relative importance of the top 50 proteomic predictors for distinguishing fetal death cases from controls. Glycoprotein hormones alpha chain (CGA), DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 9 (DNAJB9), and DNA-directed RNA polymerase III subunit RPC10 (POLR3K), emerged as the top three candidates to improve prediction relative to PlGF and sFlt-1.

The protein importance in the random forest, as assessed by the mean decrease in accuracy, for the top 50 proteins is illustrated in Figure 4b. Proteins, such as the glycoprotein hormones alpha chain, DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 9, DNA-directed RNA polymerase III subunit RPC10, vascular non-inflammatory molecule 2 (VNN2), and H/ACA ribonucleoprotein complex subunit 2 (NHP2) emerged as the most significant contributors to the model’s discriminatory capacity (Figure 4b). Of note, the latter two candidates did not meet the protein level differential abundance criteria (VNN2: q=0.17, FC=1.27; NHP2: q=0.016; FC=1.22) and hence are not listed in Table S2.

Taken together, these findings suggest that maternal plasma proteomic models have the potential to distinguish patients who have experienced a fetal death from those who have an uncomplicated pregnancy. The enhanced overall accuracy and sensitivity at 10% FPR achieved by incorporating proteins previously unstudied in the maternal plasma of patients with a fetal death suggests that such proteins may also improve prediction based on data collected from asymptomatic patients.

Cross-study validation results

The significant protein abundance changes in the 9 cases of fetal death diagnosed first with preeclampsia in this study were highly correlated with those we previously determined in patients with late preeclampsia leading to live births (Person r=0.78, p<0.001), yet their magnitude of change was larger. Indeed, for each 2-fold change in abundance in preeclampsia leading to live birth there was, on average, 8.6-fold change in preeclampsia leading fetal death (log2 linear slope of 3.11 in Figure 5A). For instance, Placenta growth factor (PGF) and Glutaredoxin-3 (GLRX3) were decreased while Fatty-acid amide hydrolase 2 (FAAH2) and Sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin 6 (SIGLEC6) were increased in preeclampsia leading to either fetal death (this study) or live birth (Andresen et al.105), among other proteins with shared dysregulation (Table S3 and Figure 5A). In contrast, Transcobalamin-2 (TCN2) and Glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase (G6PD) were decreased and Hepcidin (HAMP) was increased only in preeclampsia leading to fetal death. For additional examples of shared or fetal death specific protein dysregulation see Table S3 and Figure 5A.

Figure 5. Correlation of protein dysregulation across studies.

Figure 5.

(A) Scatterplot of log2 fold changes for proteins significantly dysregulated in fetal deaths with preeclampsia (this study) and log2 fold changes in late-onset preeclampsia from an independent study (Andresen at al. 2025)105. As an example, Placenta growth factor (PGF) and Glutaredoxin-3 (GLRX3) were decreased while Fatty-acid amide hydrolase 2 (FAAH2) and Sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin 6 (SIGLEC6) were increased in preeclampsia leading to either fetal death (this study) or live birth (Andresen et al.). In contrast, Transcobalamin-2 (TCN2) and Glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase (G6PD) were decreased and Hepcidin (HAMP) was increased only in preeclampsia leading to fetal death. (B) ROC curve showing the performance of the fetal-death random forest classifier when applied to the late-onset preeclampsia study by Andresen et al.105 (AUC = 0.72, 95% CI 0.65–0.80).

Given the shared component of protein dysregulation between preeclampsia and fetal death, a 50-protein classifier trained to discriminate fetal death from controls using the data from this study significantly discriminated late preeclampsia from controls in the dataset reported by Andresen et al105 (AUROC = 0.72, 95% CI 0.65–0.8, Figure 5B). Taken together, these cross-study analyses suggest that protein changes we report herein are likely be reproduced in other similar cohorts using the same proteomics platform.

Comment

Principal Findings of the Study

This study presents the most comprehensive analysis of the maternal plasma proteome in patients who experienced a fetal death. Specifically: (1) a significant difference in the abundance of 97 proteins, including 72 decreased and 25 increased proteins, representing approximately 1.4% of the measured maternal plasma proteome, was observed between fetal death cases and controls; (2) proteomic models incorporating proteins not previously explored in this context effectively distinguished fetal death cases from controls, achieving an area under the curve of 86%, which represents a substantial improvement over a model based on PlGF and sFlt-1 alone (AUC=72%); (3) protein dysregulation in fetal death was associated with biological processes fundamental to pregnancy, including angiogenesis, growth, and lactation related proteins; and (4) in the subset of cases in which fetal death was first diagnosed in the context of preeclampsia, protein changes were on average 8.6-fold for each 2-fold change we previously reported in late preeclampsia with live birth, while fetal death–specific patterns of dysregulation were also identified.

Results in the Context of What is Known

Our findings are consistent with and extend prior work demonstrating that fetal death is frequently associated with an anti-angiogenic profile in maternal circulation.31, 82–86, 92–96 Downregulation of angiogenesis, a biological process essential for placental development and fetal growth, may reflect disruption of normal placental vascular development.111, 138–141

This disruption is corroborated by placental histologic examination showing an increased prevalence and burden of lesions consistent with maternal vascular malperfusion in fetal deaths.26, 74–77 In a previous study from our group, placental lesions consistent with maternal vascular malperfusion were present in 75.5% (108/143) of fetal deaths, compared with 35.7% (337/944) of controls.26 The difference was even more pronounced when considering lesion burden, defined as the presence of two or more pathologic features, which occurred in 49.7% (71/143) of fetal deaths versus 7.4% (70/944) of controls.26

The maternal circulation mirrors this placental anti-angiogenic state through reduced concentrations of angiogenic factors such as PlGF and increased levels of anti-angiogenic components such as sFlt-1.8, 142 This pattern has been detected as early as 20 weeks of gestation in fetal deaths.86 Although such alterations allow prediction of fetal death,83 the anti-angiogenic profile is not specific to this condition and can result in false-positive findings.8, 31, 83 In the present study, we observed decreased abundance of multiple angiogenesis-related proteins, including prolactin, endothelial monocyte-activating polypeptide 2, placental growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor A, and angiopoietin-2, consistent with prior observations.31, 82–86

The PlGF to sFlt-1 ratio as an index for the prediction of fetal death

Additionally, the proteomic model built herein using aptamer -based measurements of PlGF and sFlt-1 resulted in a significant discrimination of cases from controls (AUC of 72%, 95% CI: 59%–84%). Of note, we did not observe a significant difference in the maternal plasma abundance of sFlt-1 between cases of fetal death and controls, which diverges from prior research findings. The SomaScan assay utilized herein employs two specific SOMAmer reagents targeting Flt-1, yet neither of these indicated a significant difference between the groups. This outcome is unexpected, considering the well-documented increases in maternal plasma concentrations of sFlt-1 associated with fetal death and other adverse pregnancy outcomes, as independently reported by various studies.8, 84–86, 143–145 Platform differences and the limited number of control patients may explain the divergence from prior findings for sFlt-1.

In this study, we broadened the search for candidate fetal death biomarkers beyond traditional angiogenesis and inflammatory marker categories by conducting a large-scale, unbiased analysis of the maternal plasma proteome. Through functional analysis of differentially abundant proteins, we uncovered a variety of biological processes that were dysregulated in cases of fetal death, including vasculature development, signaling pathways, cell migration and motility, growth and development, reproductive functions, bone and tissue remodeling, and immune response. Notably, several proteins related to immune regulation and immune–placental communication, including CD274 (PD-L1), CSF1R, IL22RA2, and EBI3, were dysregulated in cases of fetal death, supporting the concept that altered immune tolerance and immune signaling contribute to this syndrome39, 146. These findings suggest a complex landscape of biological disruptions associated with fetal death, implicating processes essential for fetal development, the immune system, and structural integrity. This underscores the value of broadening the scope of biomarker discovery to improve disease prediction.

Indeed, the integration of additional proteins into our molecular classifier, alongside PlGF and sFlt-1, increased the AUC from 72% to 86%. Notably, the proteins glycoprotein hormones alpha chain, DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 9, and DNA-directed RNA polymerase III subunit RPC10, emerged as the top three most important candidates to improve discrimination beyond PlGF and sFlt-1.

New Biomarkers and Biological Processes Implicated in Fetal Death

Glycoprotein hormones alpha chain, also known as chorionic gonadotrophin subunit alpha, is the shared alpha subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and thyroid-stimulating hormone.147 A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that low levels of human chorionic gonadotropin in the first trimester are associated with spontaneous abortion, whereas elevated levels in the second trimester are associated with both spontaneous abortion and stillbirth.148 In this study, glycoprotein hormones alpha chain abundance was significantly reduced in fetal death cases compared with controls. Similar reductions were observed for chorionic gonadotrophin subunit beta 3 and intact human chorionic gonadotropin, although these did not remain significant after correction for multiple comparisons. These proteins are produced by placental syncytiotrophoblasts.149, 150 Likewise, our earlier study of the maternal plasma proteome in uncomplicated pregnancies showed a constitutive abundance of CG-alpha followed by a reduction approaching term.101 CG-alpha and chorionic gonadotropin subunit beta 3 are produced by the placental syncytiotrophoblasts.151 Consequently, the reduced concentrations observed in cases of fetal death could indicate placental insufficiency.

DnaJ homolog subfamily B member 9, also known as endoplasmic reticulum DnaJ homolog 4 (ERdj4), emerged as the second most informative biomarker after CG-alpha. ERdj4, a co-chaperone for Hsp70 protein endoplasmic reticulum chaperone BiP, is implicated in numerous biological processes such as epithelial–mesenchymal transition, cellular survival, B-cell development, and glucose metabolism.152 It assists in the clearance of misfolded proteins through the endoplasmic-reticulum-associated protein degradation (ERAD) pathway.153 Elevated levels of ERdj4 have been reported in serum samples from individuals with fibrillary glomerulonephritis, highlighting its potential as a biomarker for this disease.154 We previously noted a moderate increase in maternal plasma levels with gestation during normal pregnancy.101 While abnormal levels of heat shock proteins have been documented in adverse pregnancy outcomes155, the increase in circulating ERdj4 in fetal death is, to our knowledge, a new finding.

Furthermore, the association between abnormal soluble DNA-directed RNA polymerase III subunit RPC10 (RPC10) and adverse pregnancy outcomes also seems to be a new finding. We previously observed an increase in the abundance of this protein in maternal plasma during uncomplicated pregnancies.101 Herein, we observed a significant decrease in the abundance of the RPC10 in fetal deaths compared to controls. Moreover, this protein is ranked 3rd among the most important biomarkers of fetal death. RPC10, a ubiquitously expressed intracellular protein, serves as a component of RNA polymerase III.151, 156, 157 It is integral to transcription termination, monitors transcription fidelity, and facilitates the correction of misincorporations.158, 159 Mutations in Pol III subunits, including RPC10, have been linked to a range of neurodegenerative diseases, notably hypomyelinating leukodystrophy.160, 161

The fact that the three most informative proteins are among those modulated during normal pregnancy aligns with our previous observation that biomarkers of preeclampsia are enriched among proteins that change with advancing gestation.97 The shared anti-angiogenic profile and presence of maternal vascular malperfusion between fetal death and preeclampsia can also explain why risk scores obtained with the fetal death proteomic classifier also significantly discriminate patients diagnosed with late-preeclampsia from gestational age matched controls. The lower discrimination accuracy obtained for late-preeclampsia in an independent dataset (AUC=0.72) relative to the cross-validated estimate for fetal death (AUC=0.86) is expected given the lower frequency of maternal vascular malperfusion and the more attenuated anti-angiogenic profile in late preeclampsia than in fetal death.8, 26, 121

New biological processes implicated in fetal death

Pathway analysis revealed dysregulation of biological processes not traditionally emphasized in clinical evaluation of fetal death. These included immune activation, complement regulation, inflammatory signaling, cellular stress responses, extracellular matrix remodeling, and metabolic pathways. These findings extend prior mechanistic work from our group showing that fetal death in normally formed fetuses is frequently preceded by hypoxia with myocardial and brain injury65. The present data demonstrate that such fetal and placental processes are accompanied by measurable changes in maternal plasma composition.

Maternal blood may therefore be conceptualized as a liquid biopsy of the placenta, fetus, and mother, providing an integrated view of intrauterine pathophysiology. Systematic analysis of the maternal plasma proteome captures biological signals arising from multiple pathogenic pathways and offers a powerful approach for interrogating complex obstetrical syndromes.

Clinical Implications

This study represents a step forward in the investigation of fetal death by expanding molecular discovery at the time of diagnosis. By moving beyond targeted biomarker approaches and applying large-scale maternal plasma proteomics, we have demonstrated that fetal death is associated with a broad spectrum of dysregulated biological processes that extend beyond angiogenic imbalance alone. Although these findings do not directly translate into immediate changes in clinical management, they provide an essential foundation for progress. Advances in the prediction and prevention of fetal death require a deeper understanding of the underlying biology, and discovery-driven studies of this nature are necessary to inform future translational efforts and the development of improved risk stratification strategies.142, 162–168 There is considerable clinical interest in identifying the risk of fetal death across all pregnancies, particularly among patients with a history of stillbirth, who face a substantively increased recurrence risk and often seek individualized risk assessment and counseling. In a large multi-country cohort study, women with a stillbirth in their first pregnancy had more than double the risk of stillbirth in a subsequent pregnancy compared with those whose first pregnancy resulted in a live birth (adjusted hazard ratio 2.25, 95% CI 1.86–2.72; absolute risks 2.5% vs 0.5%), although stillbirth remains a relatively rare outcome overall.169 These findings are consistent with other reports in third pregnancies of mothers with a stillbirth.11 Angiogenic biomarkers such as PlGF and sFlt-1 perform well in pregnancies characterized by maternal vascular malperfusion82–84, 88, 144, 145, 170 but may not capture risk arising from other pathogenic pathways. Fetal death is a syndrome, and biomarkers limited to angiogenic pathways will therefore miss some cases. Discovery-based approaches, including large-scale proteomic profiling, a platform that has yielded encouraging results in identifying candidate biomarkers across the great obstetrical syndromes,101, 171–175 can help uncover additional pathways and expand the repertoire of potential risk markers beyond placental vascular dysfunction.

Research Implications

The ability to accurately identify women at risk of fetal death will allow for optimal clinical management and development of suitable treatment strategies. Proteins dysregulated at the time of diagnosis of fetal death, such as PlGF and sFlt-1, have been shown to have predictive value prior to diagnosis at 24–28 weeks of gestation.83 Similar evidence of dysregulation in maternal plasma protein abundance at the time of diagnosis being preceded by changes earlier in gestation has been found for other obstetrical syndromes such as preeclampsia and SGA.8, 97, 100, 176 Therefore, the fact that this study identified proteins that are more differentially dysregulated at the time of diagnosis relative to the state-of-the-art biomarkers (the combination of PlGF and sFlt1) suggests their predictive value in samples collected prior to diagnosis. Therefore, integrating such novel proteomic markers with known risk factors of fetal death has the potential to improve the prediction of this syndrome. While a cross-validated AUC of 86% was obtained using a highly multiplexed platform, it is reasonable to assume that more accurate targeted assays for the novel candidate proteins may lead to superior prediction accuracy.

Strengths and Limitations

The strengths of this study include the profiling of more than 7000 protein analytes and the robust data analysis methods that include the control of the false discovery rate and cross-validation. Cross-study validation of changes in a subset of cases first diagnosed with preeclampsia is also a strength. Limitations include the moderate sample size given the low prevalence of fetal death and data collection from a single center located in an area with a high risk for preterm birth, hence possibly restricting the generalizability of the results to other populations. Replication of the study using larger and more diverse cohorts, eventually including multiple gestations is therefore warranted. Although the number of controls used in the primary analysis was lower (n=23) than the number of cases (n=38), the resulting proteomic changes reported were consistent with those obtained when data from 91 additional controls were included. Furthermore, although we demonstrated a significant correlation between protein log2 fold-changes in fetal death with preeclampsia and those reported in late preeclampsia in an independent study, the gestational age window at sampling in the late preeclampsia study was narrower (30–41 weeks vs 20–41 weeks) and the fraction of cases already diagnosed with the disease at the time of blood collection was lower (61% vs 100%). It is also important to acknowledge that the samples were collected after diagnosis which likely occurred up to several days after fetal demise. Future studies will be needed to determine if the changes observed at the time of diagnosis are also present several weeks before diagnosis, and hence they could have prediction value for fetal death.

Conclusion

This study provides the most comprehensive investigation of the proteomic profiles of maternal plasma in pregnancies complicated by fetal death. The differential abundance of specific proteins, coupled with functional analysis, highlights the dysregulation of pregnancy-related biological processes in fetal death. Furthermore, the superior accuracy of plasma proteomic models relative to state-of-the-art protein markers (PlGF and sFlt-1) supports the potential utility of the new candidate markers for this disease.

Supplementary Material

TableS1

Table S1: Clinical and obstetrical characteristics and placenta pathology of patients with fetal death. GA: gestational age.

TableS2

Table S2: List of differentially abundant proteins in maternal plasma of women with fetal death and controls. LogFC: log 2 fold change; p: p-value; q: adjusted p-value.

TableS3

Table S3: Shared and fetal death specific maternal plasma protein dysregulation in patients diagnosed with preeclampsia. LogFC: log 2 fold change; p: p-value; q: adjusted p-value. FD: fetal death. PE: preeclampsia.

Figure S1

AJOG at a Glance.

  1. Why was this study conducted?
    • To identify candidate biomarkers that can improve prediction of fetal death beyond the currently known biomarkers [placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1)].
  2. What are the key findings?
    • 87 proteins differed in abundance between fetal death cases and gestational-age-matched controls.
    • New candidate biomarkers significantly increased the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for fetal death classification from 72% (for PlGF and sFlt-1) to 86%.
    • Proteomic changes in a subset of fetal death cases diagnosed first with preeclampsia were in average 8.6-fold for each 2-fold change we reported in preeclampsia resulting in live births.
  3. What does this study add to what is already known?
    • PlGF and sFlt-1 are dysregulated in maternal plasma at the time of the diagnosis of fetal death and predict this syndrome at 24–28 weeks of gestation, yet additional biomarkers are needed.
    • This study identified new proteins that can add information relative to PlGF and sFlt-1, paving the way for future studies to assess the risk of fetal death in samples collected before the diagnosis.

Financial support:

This work was supported, in part, by the Pregnancy Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, United States Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS); and, in part, by federal funds from NICHD/NIH/DHHS (Contract No. HHSN275201300006C). A.L.T. and T.C were supported by the NICHD under Award Number R21HD115800. N.G-L is supported by NIAID/NIH (RAI184481A) and the Next Gen Pregnancy Initiative of the Burroughs Wellcome Fund (1263500). R.R. has contributed to this work as part of his official duties as an employee of the United States Federal Government.

Role of the funding source:

The funder had no role in the design or conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Glossary

Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve

A summary measure of a model’s ability to correctly distinguish cases from controls.

Cross-Validation

A model evaluation approach in which the dataset is partitioned into multiple folds, with each fold used once as an independent test set while the remaining folds are used for training.

Decision Tree

A simple predictive model that classifies samples by applying a series of sequential rules based on feature values, resembling a flowchart.

False Discovery Rate (FDR)

The expected proportion of false positive findings among all results declared statistically significant.

Feature Importance

A measure of how much a specific protein contributes to a model’s predictive accuracy.

Hypergeometric Test

A statistical test used to identify biological processes that are overrepresented among proteins showing significant changes in abundance compared with what would be expected by chance.

Multiple of the Mean

A normalized measure of protein abundance in which each value is expressed relative to the mean value at the same gestational age.

Multiple Testing Correction

A statistical adjustment applied when many hypotheses are tested simultaneously.

Principal Component Analysis

An unsupervised method that reduces high-dimensional data into a smaller number of components that capture the main sources of variation.

Random Forest

A machine-learning method that combines many decision trees to improve predictive accuracy and robustness.

Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve

A graphical summary of model performance that plots sensitivity against the false-positive rate.

Sensitivity

The proportion of true cases correctly identified by the model.

Specificity

The proportion of true controls correctly identified by the model.

q-value

An FDR-adjusted nominal p-value that accounts for multiple testing.

Footnotes

Disclosure: All authors report no conflicts of interest

References

  • 1.Gregory ECW, Valenzuela CP, Hoyert DL. Fetal Mortality: United States, 2021. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2023;72:1–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.W, H, O. Maternal Mortality. World Health Organization, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(2023–2024) tC. H.R.4581 - Maternal and Child Health Stillbirth Prevention Act of 2024, 2024.
  • 4.National Center for Health Statistics. User guide to the 2021 fetal death public use file, 2023.
  • 5.Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Scorza WE, Knuppel RA. Prenatal care and black-white fetal death disparity in the United States: heterogeneity by high-risk conditions. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:483–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Romero R Prenatal medicine: the child is the father of the man. 1996. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009;22:636–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Brosens I, Pijnenborg R, Vercruysse L, Romero R. The “Great Obstetrical Syndromes” are associated with disorders of deep placentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:193–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Romero R, Jung E, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. Toward a new taxonomy of obstetrical disease: improved performance of maternal blood biomarkers for the great obstetrical syndromes when classified according to placental pathology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;227:615.e1–15.e25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Kim CJ. Placental bed disorders in the genesis of the great obstetrical syndromes. In: Pijnenborg R, Brosens I, Romero R, eds. Placental Bed Disorders: Basic Science and its Translation to Obstetrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Di Renzo GC. The great obstetrical syndromes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009;22:633–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Al Khalaf S, Kublickiene K, Kublickas M, Khashan AS, Heazell AEP. Risk of stillbirth and adverse pregnancy outcomes in a third pregnancy when an earlier pregnancy has ended in stillbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2024;103:111–20. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14705. Epub 2023 Oct 27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gomez GB, Kamb ML, Newman LM, Mark J, Broutet N, Hawkes SJ. Untreated maternal syphilis and adverse outcomes of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ 2013;91:217–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ilgenfritz R, Lai AC, Pereira FG, Braga AC, Pontinha CM, Patrier S. Stillbirth and Congenital Syphilis: Autopsy and Placental Findings of 11 Cases and Review of the Literature. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2025;28:104–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pongchaikul P, Romero R, Wongsurawat T, et al. Molecular evidence in support of hematogenous dissemination of intraamniotic infection caused by Listeria monocytogenes in spontaneous preterm labor. Journal of perinatal medicine 2025;53:1023–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Romero R, Winn HN, Wan M, Hobbins JC. Listeria monocytogenes chorioamnionitis and preterm labor. Am J Perinatol 1988;5:286–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lamont RF, Sobel J, Mazaki-Tovi S, et al. Listeriosis in human pregnancy: a systematic review. Journal of perinatal medicine 2011;39:227–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kallapur MG, Ghanchi NK, Harakuni SU, et al. Group B streptococcal prevalence in internal organs and placentas of deceased neonates and stillbirths in South Asia. Bjog 2023;130:53–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Seale AC, Blencowe H, Bianchi-Jassir F, et al. Stillbirth With Group B Streptococcus Disease Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. Clin Infect Dis 2017;65:S125–s32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McClure EM, Silver RM, Kim J, et al. Maternal infection and stillbirth: a review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022;35:4442–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jaiman S, Romero R, Gotsch F, et al. Fetal sepsis: a cause of stillbirth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022;35:9966–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bascietto F, Liberati M, Murgano D, et al. Outcome of fetuses with congenital parvovirus B19 infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;52:569–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rodis JF, Borgida AF, Wilson M, et al. Management of parvovirus infection in pregnancy and outcomes of hydrops: a survey of members of the Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:985–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rodis JF, Quinn DL, Gary GW Jr., et al. Management and outcomes of pregnancies complicated by human B19 parvovirus infection: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:1168–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pesch MH, Mowers J, Huynh A, Schleiss MR. Intrauterine Fetal Demise, Spontaneous Abortion and Congenital Cytomegalovirus: A Systematic Review of the Incidence and Histopathologic Features. Viruses 2024;16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Contejean A, Leruez-Ville M, Treluyer JM, et al. Assessing the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and birth defects reporting in women exposed to ganciclovir or valganciclovir during pregnancy: a pharmacovigilance study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2023;78:1265–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jaiman S, Romero R, Pacora P, et al. Disorders of placental villous maturation in fetal death. Journal of perinatal medicine 2020;48:345–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kulkarni VG, McClure EM, Goldenberg RL. Placental vascular malperfusion lesions are associated with hypertension, growth restriction, and antepartum hemorrhage and ultimately with fetal and preterm neonatal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;227:363–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kulkarni VG, Sunilkumar KB, Nagaraj TS, et al. Maternal and fetal vascular lesions of malperfusion in the placentas associated with fetal and neonatal death: results of a prospective observational study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;225:660.e1–60.e12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pacora P, Romero R, Jung E, et al. Reduced fetal growth velocity precedes antepartum fetal death. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021;57:942–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chang KT, Keating S, Costa S, Machin G, Kingdom J, Shannon P. Third-trimester stillbirths: correlative neuropathology and placental pathology. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2011;14:345–52. doi: 10.2350/10-07-0882-OA.1. Epub 2011 Feb 23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Smith GC, Crossley JA, Aitken DA, et al. Circulating angiogenic factors in early pregnancy and the risk of preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, spontaneous preterm birth, and stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:1316–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Smith GC, Yu CK, Papageorghiou AT, Cacho AM, Nicolaides KH. Maternal uterine artery Doppler flow velocimetry and the risk of stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:144–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ananth CV, Lavery JA, Vintzileos AM, et al. Severe placental abruption: clinical definition and associations with maternal complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:272.e1–72.e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. Ischemic placental disease: maternal versus fetal clinical presentations by gestational age. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;23:887–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM. Ischemic placental disease: epidemiology and risk factors. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011;159:77–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ananth CV, Peltier MR, Kinzler WL, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. Chronic hypertension and risk of placental abruption: is the association modified by ischemic placental disease? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:273.e1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lannaman K, Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. Fetal death: an extreme manifestation of maternal anti-fetal rejection. Journal of perinatal medicine 2017;45:851–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hannoun P, Rabant M, Usureau C, Taupin JL, Zuber J, Benachi A. Immune Tolerance Breakdown in Pregnancy: Transplantation Parallels in Chronic Intervillositis and Villitis of Unknown Etiology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2025:S0002–9378(25)00881–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kim CJ, Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, Kim JS. Chronic inflammation of the placenta: definition, classification, pathogenesis, and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:S53–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Benachi A, Rabant M, Martinovic J, et al. Chronic histiocytic intervillositis: manifestation of placental alloantibody-mediated rejection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;225:662.e1–62.e11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hannoun P, Zuber J, Benachi A. Emerging evidence for immunomodulation in chronic intervillositis: nuances and perspectives. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Blue NR, Allshouse AA, Moyle KA, Dimick K, Silver RM. A Pilot Study of Ultrasound Assessment of Umbilical Cord and Placental Vascular Flow for Cord Accident Stillbirth Prevention. J Ultrasound Med 2024;43:2153–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Collins JH. Umbilical cord accidents: human studies. Semin Perinatol 2002;26:79–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hayes DJL, Warland J, Parast MM, et al. Umbilical cord characteristics and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020;15:e0239630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pinar H, Carpenter M. Placenta and umbilical cord abnormalities seen with stillbirth. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010;53:656–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Parast MM, Crum CP, Boyd TK. Placental histologic criteria for umbilical blood flow restriction in unexplained stillbirth. Hum Pathol 2008;39:948–53. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.10.032. Epub 08 Apr 21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Donovan B, Bonanni G, Javinani A, et al. Ultrasound screening for vasa previa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2025;233:591–603.e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nwandison M, Daly-Jones E, Drought A, et al. Incorporation of vasa previa screening into a routine anomaly scan: A single center cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2024;103:1466–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Oyelese Y, Javinani A, Gudanowski B, et al. Vasa previa in singleton pregnancies: diagnosis and clinical management based on an international expert consensus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024;231:638.e1–38.e24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ryan WD, Trivedi N, Benirschke K, Lacoursiere DY, Parast MM. Placental histologic criteria for diagnosis of cord accident: sensitivity and specificity. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2012;15:275–80. doi: 10.2350/11-12-1127-OA.1. Epub 2012 Mar 8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Dolanc Merc M, Peterlin B, Lovrecic L. The genetic approach to stillbirth: A »systematic review«. Prenat Diagn 2023;43:1220–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Stanley KE, Giordano J, Thorsten V, et al. Causal Genetic Variants in Stillbirth. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1107–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Stanley KE, Wapner RJ, Goldstein DB. Causal Genetic Variants in Stillbirth. Reply. N Engl J Med 2020;383:2687–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wojcik MH. Genomic Insights into Stillbirth. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1182–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Akbari A, Palizvan F, Mirshahi A, Salehi F. Recurrent pregnancy loss and fetal complete heart block as the initial manifestations of maternal systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report on the diagnostic and preventive role of anti-SSA (Ro) antibodies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2025;25:731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Beinder E, Grancay T, Menéndez T, Singer H, Hofbeck M. Fetal sinus bradycardia and the long QT syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:743–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cuneo BF, Kaizer AM, Clur SA, et al. Mothers with long QT syndrome are at increased risk for fetal death: findings from a multicenter international study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;222:263.e1–63.e11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ottaviani G, Leonardi P, Del Fabbro M, Ramos SG. Sudden Unexpected Infant and Perinatal Death: Pathological Findings of the Cardiac Conduction System. Diagnostics (Basel) 2025;15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Stirnemann J, Maltret A, Haydar A, Stos B, Bonnet D, Ville Y. Successful in utero transesophageal pacing for severe drug-resistant tachyarrhythmia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;219:320–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Clement NS, Abul A, Farrelly R, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2025;232:354–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.McElwee ER, Oliver EA, McFarling K, et al. Risk of Stillbirth in Pregnancies Complicated by Diabetes, Stratified by Fetal Growth. Obstet Gynecol 2023;141:801–09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sultana Z, Maiti K, Dedman L, Smith R. Is there a role for placental senescence in the genesis of obstetric complications and fetal growth restriction? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218:S762–s73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Arthurs AL, Jackson MR, McCullough D, et al. Circular RNAs accumulate in aging human placental tissue and in stillbirth, leading to DNA damage and cellular senescence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2026;234:210–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Nardi E, Seidita I, Abati I, et al. The placenta in fetal death: molecular evidence of dysregulation of inflammatory, proliferative, and fetal protective pathways. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2025;232:328.e1–28.e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pacora P, Romero R, Jaiman S, et al. Mechanisms of death in structurally normal stillbirths. Journal of perinatal medicine 2018;47:222–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Agarwal U, Hugh O, Gardosi J. Prospective risk of stillbirth according to fetal size at term. Journal of perinatal medicine 2022;50:748–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Butler E, Hugh O, Gardosi J. Evaluating the Growth Assessment Protocol for stillbirth prevention: progress and challenges. Journal of perinatal medicine 2022;50:737–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gardosi J Preventing stillbirth: risk factors, case reviews, care pathways. Journal of perinatal medicine 2022;50:639–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gardosi J, Giddings S, Buller S, Southam M, Williams M. Preventing stillbirths through improved antenatal recognition of pregnancies at risk due to fetal growth restriction. Public Health 2014;128:698–702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hugh O, Cowan J, Butler E, Gardosi J. Fetal size vs growth: comparative analysis of 3 models of growth velocity based on third trimester estimated fetal weights for identifying stillbirth risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024;231:336.e1–36.e11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Smolina A, Rahman A, Cahill L, et al. Developmental trajectories predictive of stillbirth in a longitudinal mouse model of fetal growth restriction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2025;329:H1706–H15. doi: 10.152/ajpheart.00627.2025. Epub 2025 Nov 3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hiersch L, Lipworth H, Kingdom J, Barrett J, Melamed N. Identification of the optimal growth chart and threshold for the prediction of antepartum stillbirth. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021;303:381–90. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-5747-4. Epub 2020 Aug 14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Chandran AR, Agrawal S, Hobson SR, Windrim RC, Parks T, Kingdom JC. Stillbirth Following Normal Ultrasound Findings and Maternal Placental Growth Factor Levels. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2021;43:1426–28. doi: 10.016/j.jogc.2021.07.019. Epub 21 Aug 16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Pinar H, Goldenberg RL, Koch MA, et al. Placental findings in singleton stillbirths. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:325–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Man J, Hutchinson JC, Heazell AE, Ashworth M, Jeffrey I, Sebire NJ. Stillbirth and intrauterine fetal death: role of routine histopathological placental findings to determine cause of death. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48:579–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Bar J, Schreiber L, Ben-Haroush A, Ahmed H, Golan A, Kovo M. The placental vascular component in early and late intrauterine fetal death. Thromb Res 2012;130:901–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kidron D, Bernheim J, Aviram R. Placental findings contributing to fetal death, a study of 120 stillbirths between 23 and 40 weeks gestation. Placenta 2009;30:700–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Soni S, Stevens A, Batra G, Heazell AEP. Characterising delayed villous maturation: A narrative literature review. Placenta 2024;158:48–56.: 10.1016/j.placenta.2024.09.020. Epub 24 Oct 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Saleemuddin A, Tantbirojn P, Sirois K, et al. Obstetric and perinatal complications in placentas with fetal thrombotic vasculopathy. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2010;13:459–64. doi: 10.2350/10-01-0774-OA.1. Epub 2010 May 3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kim CJ, Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, Chaiyasit N, Yoon BH, Kim YM. Acute chorioamnionitis and funisitis: definition, pathologic features, and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:S29–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Brady CA, Riley T, Batra G, Crocker I, Heazell AEP. Characterizing Histopathologic Features in Pregnancies With Chronic Histiocytic Intervillositis Using Computerized Image Analysis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2024;148:430–42. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0494-OA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chaiworapongsa T, Kusanovic JP, Savasan ZA, et al. Fetal death: a condition with a dissociation in the concentrations of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 between the maternal and fetal compartments. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;23:960–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Erez O, et al. The prediction of fetal death with a simple maternal blood test at 24–28 weeks: a role for angiogenic index-1 (PlGF/sVEGFR-1 ratio). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;217:682.e1–82.e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Korzeniewski SJ, et al. Maternal plasma concentrations of angiogenic/antiangiogenic factors in the third trimester of pregnancy to identify the patient at risk for stillbirth at or near term and severe late preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:287.e1–87.e15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Espinoza J, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, et al. Unexplained fetal death: another anti-angiogenic state. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007;20:495–507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, Erez O, et al. An imbalance between angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors precedes fetal death in a subset of patients: results of a longitudinal study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;23:1384–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Korzeniewski SJ, Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. Maternal plasma angiogenic index-1 (placental growth factor/soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1) is a biomarker for the burden of placental lesions consistent with uteroplacental underperfusion: a longitudinal case-cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:629.e1–29.e17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Whitten AE, Romero R, Korzeniewski SJ, et al. Evidence of an imbalance of angiogenic/antiangiogenic factors in massive perivillous fibrin deposition (maternal floor infarction): a placental lesion associated with recurrent miscarriage and fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:310.e1–10.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.017. Epub 13 Jan 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Dinglas C, Afsar N, Cochrane E, et al. First-trimester maternal serum alpha fetoprotein is associated with ischemic placental disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;222:499.e1–99.e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Cusick W, Rodis JF, Vintzileos AM, Albini SM, McMahon M, Campbell WA. Predicting pregnancy outcome from the degree of maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein elevation. J Reprod Med 1996;41:327–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Côté ML, Giguère Y, Forest JC, et al. First-Trimester PlGF and PAPP-A and the Risk of Placenta-Mediated Complications: PREDICTION Prospective Study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2025;47:102732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ay C, Kaider A, Koder S, Husslein P, Pabinger I. Association of elevated soluble P-selectin levels with fetal loss in women with a history of venous thromboembolism. Thromb Res 2012;129:725–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Erez O, Gotsch F, Mazaki-Tovi S, et al. Evidence of maternal platelet activation, excessive thrombin generation, and high amniotic fluid tissue factor immunoreactivity and functional activity in patients with fetal death. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009;22:672–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Gallo DM, Fitzgerald W, Romero R, et al. Proteomic profile of extracellular vesicles in maternal plasma of women with fetal death. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2023;36:2177529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Parry S, Carper BA, Grobman WA, et al. Placental protein levels in maternal serum are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;227:497 e1–97 e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Richani K, Romero R, Soto E, et al. Unexplained intrauterine fetal death is accompanied by activation of complement. Journal of perinatal medicine 2005;33:296–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Erez O, Romero R, Maymon E, et al. The prediction of late-onset preeclampsia: Results from a longitudinal proteomics study. PLoS One 2017;12:e0181468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Romero R, Erez O, Maymon E, et al. The maternal plasma proteome changes as a function of gestational age in normal pregnancy: a longitudinal study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;217:67.e1–67.e21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Tarca AL, Pataki B, Romero R, et al. Crowdsourcing assessment of maternal blood multi-omics for predicting gestational age and preterm birth. Cell Rep Med 2021;2:100323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Tarca AL, Romero R, Benshalom-Tirosh N, et al. The prediction of early preeclampsia: Results from a longitudinal proteomics study. PLoS One 2019;14:e0217273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Tarca AL, Romero R, Bhatti G, et al. Human Plasma Proteome During Normal Pregnancy. J Proteome Res 2022;21:2687–702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Gold L, Ayers D, Bertino J, et al. Aptamer-based multiplexed proteomic technology for biomarker discovery. PLoS One 2010;5:e15004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Degnes ML, Westerberg AC, Zucknick M, et al. Placenta-derived proteins across gestation in healthy pregnancies-a novel approach to assess placental function? BMC Med 2022;20:227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Tarca AL, Romero R, Erez O, et al. Maternal whole blood mRNA signatures identify women at risk of early preeclampsia: a longitudinal study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Andresen IJ, Romero R, Westerberg AC, et al. Large-Scale Proteomics Reveals New Candidate Biomarkers for Late-Onset Preeclampsia. Hypertension 2025;83:e25189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Committee Opinion No 700: Methods for Estimating the Due Date. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129:e150–e54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Macdorman MF, Kirmeyer S. The challenge of fetal mortality. NCHS Data Brief 2009:1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Bulletins--Obstetrics ACoP. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:159–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:163–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Romero R, Kim YM, Pacora P, et al. The frequency and type of placental histologic lesions in term pregnancies with normal outcome. Journal of perinatal medicine 2018;46:613–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Espinoza J, Romero R, Mee Kim Y, et al. Normal and abnormal transformation of the spiral arteries during pregnancy. Journal of perinatal medicine 2006;34:447–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Jacques SM, Qureshi F, Kim CJ, et al. Eosinophilic/T-cell chorionic vasculitis: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 51 cases. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2011;14:198–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Jaiman S, Romero R, Pacora P, et al. Disorders of placental villous maturation are present in one-third of cases with spontaneous preterm labor. Journal of perinatal medicine 2021;49:412–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Jaiman S, Romero R, Pacora P, et al. Disorders of placental villous maturation in fetal death. Journal of perinatal medicine 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Kim CJ, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, et al. The frequency, clinical significance, and pathological features of chronic chorioamnionitis: a lesion associated with spontaneous preterm birth. Mod Pathol 2010;23:1000–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Kim CJ, Yoon BH, Romero R, et al. Umbilical arteritis and phlebitis mark different stages of the fetal inflammatory response. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:496–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Kim JS, Romero R, Cushenberry E, et al. Distribution of CD14+ and CD68+ macrophages in the placental bed and basal plate of women with preeclampsia and preterm labor. Placenta 2007;28:571–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Kim JS, Romero R, Kim MR, et al. Involvement of Hofbauer cells and maternal T cells in villitis of unknown aetiology. Histopathology 2008;52:457–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Kim MJ, Romero R, Kim CJ, et al. Villitis of unknown etiology is associated with a distinct pattern of chemokine up-regulation in the feto-maternal and placental compartments: implications for conjoint maternal allograft rejection and maternal anti-fetal graft-versus-host disease. J Immunol 2009;182:3919–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Kim YM, Chaemsaithong P, Romero R, et al. Placental lesions associated with acute atherosis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015;28:1554–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Ogge G, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, et al. Placental lesions associated with maternal underperfusion are more frequent in early-onset than in late-onset preeclampsia. Journal of perinatal medicine 2011;39:641–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Romero R, Pacora P, Kusanovic JP, et al. Clinical chorioamnionitis at term X: microbiology, clinical signs, placental pathology, and neonatal bacteremia - implications for clinical care. Journal of perinatal medicine 2021;49:275–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Yoon BH, Romero R, Park JS, et al. The relationship among inflammatory lesions of the umbilical cord (funisitis), umbilical cord plasma interleukin 6 concentration, amniotic fluid infection, and neonatal sepsis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1124–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Redline RW, Heller D, Keating S, Kingdom J. Placental diagnostic criteria and clinical correlation--a workshop report. Placenta 2005;26 Suppl A:S114–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Khong TY, Mooney EE, Ariel I, et al. Sampling and Definitions of Placental Lesions: Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016;140:698–713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Candia J, Daya GN, Tanaka T, Ferrucci L, Walker KA. Assessment of variability in the plasma 7k SomaScan proteomics assay. Sci Rep 2022;12:17147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.SomaLogic. SomaScan Assay v4.1: This technical note provides background on the platform itself, as well as performance metrics for the SomaScan Assay v4.1, 2022.
  • 128.Bhatti G, Romero R, Gomez-Lopez N, et al. The amniotic fluid proteome changes with term labor and informs biomarker discovery in maternal plasma. Sci Rep 2023;13:3136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Gomez-Lopez N, Romero R, Escobar MF, et al. Pregnancy-specific responses to COVID-19 revealed by high-throughput proteomics of human plasma. Commun Med (Lond) 2023;3:48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Andresen IJ, Zucknick M, Degnes ML, et al. Prediction of late-onset preeclampsia using plasma proteomics: a longitudinal multi-cohort study. Sci Rep 2024;14:30813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, et al. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 2004;5:R80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Tarca AL, Romero R, Xu Z, et al. Targeted expression profiling by RNA-Seq improves detection of cellular dynamics during pregnancy and identifies a role for T cells in term parturition. Sci Rep 2019;9:848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000;25:25–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Maglott D, Ostell J, Pruitt KD, Tatusova T. Entrez Gene: gene-centered information at NCBI. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:D54–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Breiman L Random Forests. Machine Learning 2001;45:5–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Nicodemus KK. Letter to the editor: on the stability and ranking of predictors from random forest variable importance measures. Brief Bioinform 2011;12:369–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Reynolds LP, Redmer DA. Angiogenesis in the placenta. Biol Reprod 2001;64:1033–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Zygmunt M, Herr F, Munstedt K, Lang U, Liang OD. Angiogenesis and vasculogenesis in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;110 Suppl 1:S10–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Reynolds LP, Caton JS, Redmer DA, et al. Evidence for altered placental blood flow and vascularity in compromised pregnancies. J Physiol 2006;572:51–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Huang Z, Huang S, Song T, Yin Y, Tan C. Placental Angiogenesis in Mammals: A Review of the Regulatory Effects of Signaling Pathways and Functional Nutrients. Adv Nutr 2021;12:2415–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Agrawal S, Parks WT, Zeng HD, et al. Diagnostic utility of serial circulating placental growth factor levels and uterine artery Doppler waveforms in diagnosing underlying placental diseases in pregnancies at high risk of placental dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;227:618 e1–18 e16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Maynard SE, Min JY, Merchan J, et al. Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia. J Clin Invest 2003;111:649–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Kim YM, et al. Plasma soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 concentration is elevated prior to the clinical diagnosis of pre-eclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;17:3–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Chaiworapongsa T, Espinoza J, Gotsch F, et al. The maternal plasma soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 concentration is elevated in SGA and the magnitude of the increase relates to Doppler abnormalities in the maternal and fetal circulation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21:25–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Gomez-Lopez N, Kareus E, Lee S. Immune cellular homeostasis and its breakdown at the maternal-fetal interface. Trends Immunol 2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Fiddes JC, Goodman HM. The gene encoding the common alpha subunit of the four human glycoprotein hormones. J Mol Appl Genet 1981;1:3–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Peris M, Crompton K, Shepherd DA, Amor DJ. The association between human chorionic gonadotropin and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024;230:118–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Benveniste R, Scommegha A. Human chorionic gonadotropin alpha-subunit in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;141:952–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Reuter AM, Gaspard UJ, Deville JL, Vrindts-Gevaert Y, Franchimont P. Serum concentrations of human chorionic gonadotrophin and its alpha and beta subunits. 1. During normal singleton and twin pregnancies. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1980;13:305–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Uhlen M, Fagerberg L, Hallstrom BM, et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 2015;347:1260419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Daverkausen-Fischer L, Prols F. The function of the co-chaperone ERdj4 in diverse (patho-)physiological conditions. Cell Mol Life Sci 2021;79:9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Dong M, Bridges JP, Apsley K, Xu Y, Weaver TE. ERdj4 and ERdj5 are required for endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation of misfolded surfactant protein C. Mol Biol Cell 2008;19:2620–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Nasr SH, Dasari S, Lieske JC, et al. Serum levels of DNAJB9 are elevated in fibrillary glomerulonephritis patients. Kidney Int 2019;95:1269–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Jee B, Dhar R, Singh S, Karmakar S. Heat Shock Proteins and Their Role in Pregnancy: Redefining the Function of “Old Rum in a New Bottle”. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:648463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Mishra S, Maraia RJ. RNA polymerase III subunits C37/53 modulate rU:dA hybrid 3’ end dynamics during transcription termination. Nucleic Acids Res 2019;47:310–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Li L, Yu Z, Zhao D, Ren Y, Hou H, Xu Y. Structure of human RNA polymerase III elongation complex. Cell Res 2021;31:791–800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Chedin S, Riva M, Schultz P, Sentenac A, Carles C. The RNA cleavage activity of RNA polymerase III is mediated by an essential TFIIS-like subunit and is important for transcription termination. Genes Dev 1998;12:3857–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Wang Q, Li S, Wan F, et al. Structural insights into transcriptional regulation of human RNA polymerase III. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2021;28:220–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Dorboz I, Dumay-Odelot H, Boussaid K, et al. Mutation in POLR3K causes hypomyelinating leukodystrophy and abnormal ribosomal RNA regulation. Neurol Genet 2018;4:e289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Lata E, Choquet K, Sagliocco F, Brais B, Bernard G, Teichmann M. RNA Polymerase III Subunit Mutations in Genetic Diseases. Front Mol Biosci 2021;8:696438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.McLaughlin K, Snelgrove JW, Audette MC, et al. PlGF (Placental Growth Factor) Testing in Clinical Practice: Evidence From a Canadian Tertiary Maternity Referral Center. Hypertension 2021;77:2057–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Balyan K, Humtso BY, Meena B, Sapna S, Rana A, Kumar M. Materno-fetal outcome with PlGF above or below cutoff during second half of pregnancy in high-risk women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Hong J, Crawford K, Cavanagh E, da Silva Costa F, Kumar S. Placental biomarkers and fetoplacental Dopplers in combination reliably predict preterm birth in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Ashwal E, Keunen J, Ravichandran A, et al. Comparison of circulating maternal placenta growth factor levels and sonographic evaluation of patients with abnormal first trimester screening analytes. Prenat Diagn 2023;43:1044–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Spencer R, Maksym K, Hecher K, et al. Maternal PlGF and umbilical Dopplers predict pregnancy outcomes at diagnosis of early-onset fetal growth restriction. J Clin Invest 2023;133:e169199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Hong J, Crawford K, Cavanagh E, da Silva Costa F, Kumar S. Prediction of preterm birth in growth-restricted and appropriate-for-gestational-age infants using maternal PlGF and the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio-A prospective study. BJOG 2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Heazell AEP, Sharp AN. Small Babies, Big Questions: Determining Stillbirth Risk to Personalise Care. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2026;23:70110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Lamont K, Scott NW, Gissler M, Gatt M, Bhattacharya S. Risk of Recurrent Stillbirth in Subsequent Pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2022;139:31–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Romero R, Whitten A, Korzeniewski SJ, et al. Maternal floor infarction/massive perivillous fibrin deposition: a manifestation of maternal antifetal rejection? Am J Reprod Immunol 2013;70:285–98. doi: 10.1111/aji.12143. Epub 2013 Aug 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Gallo DM, Romero R, Bosco M, et al. Maternal plasma cytokines and the subsequent risk of uterine atony and postpartum hemorrhage. Journal of perinatal medicine 2023;51:219–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Ghaemi MS, Tarca AL, Romero R, et al. Proteomic signatures predict preeclampsia in individual cohorts but not across cohorts - implications for clinical biomarker studies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022;35:5621–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Gudicha DW, Romero R, Gomez-Lopez N, et al. The amniotic fluid proteome predicts imminent preterm delivery in asymptomatic women with a short cervix. Sci Rep 2022;12:11781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Tarca AL, Pataki B, Romero R, et al. Crowdsourcing assessment of maternal blood multi-omics for predicting gestational age and preterm birth. Cell Rep Med 2021;2:100323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Than NG, Romero R, Györffy D, et al. Molecular subclasses of preeclampsia characterized by a longitudinal maternal proteomics study: distinct biomarkers, disease pathways and options for prevention. Journal of perinatal medicine 2023;51:51–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Levine RJ, Maynard SE, Qian C, et al. Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2004;350:672–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

TableS1

Table S1: Clinical and obstetrical characteristics and placenta pathology of patients with fetal death. GA: gestational age.

TableS2

Table S2: List of differentially abundant proteins in maternal plasma of women with fetal death and controls. LogFC: log 2 fold change; p: p-value; q: adjusted p-value.

TableS3

Table S3: Shared and fetal death specific maternal plasma protein dysregulation in patients diagnosed with preeclampsia. LogFC: log 2 fold change; p: p-value; q: adjusted p-value. FD: fetal death. PE: preeclampsia.

Figure S1

RESOURCES