Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1971 Feb;213(1):157–174. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009374

The orientation specificity of two visual after-effects

Colin Blakemore, Jacob Nachmias
PMCID: PMC1331729  PMID: 5575335

Abstract

1. Inspection of a high-contrast adapting grating produces two visual after-effects: (a) the contrast threshold is raised for test gratings of similar spatial frequency to that of the adapting pattern and (b) the apparent spatial frequency of test gratings shifts away from that of the adapting grating—higher frequencies seem higher and lower ones lower than they really are.

2. Both after-effects are orientation-specific. A horizontal adapting grating influences neither the threshold nor the apparent spatial frequency of vertical test gratings.

3. The magnitude of the two after-effects was measured with vertical test gratings as a function of (a) tilt of a high-contrast adapting grating and (b) contrast of a vertical adapting grating.

4. At all frequencies of the test grating, the decline of both after-effects produced by an increase in tilt of approximately 6¾° could be matched by a reduction in contrast by a factor of 2.

5. We take this as evidence for a common neural origin for these two visual phenomena.

Full text

PDF
157

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARLOW H. B., SPARROCK J. M. THE ROLE OF AFTERIMAGES IN DARK ADAPTATION. Science. 1964 Jun 12;144(3624):1309–1314. doi: 10.1126/science.144.3624.1309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blakemore C., Campbell F. W. Adaptation to spatial stimuli. J Physiol. 1969 Jan;200(1):11P–13P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blakemore C., Campbell F. W. On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J Physiol. 1969 Jul;203(1):237–260. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blakemore C., Nachmias J., Sutton P. The perceived spatial frequency shift: evidence for frequency-selective neurones in the human brain. J Physiol. 1970 Oct;210(3):727–750. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blakemore C., Sutton P. Size adaptation: a new aftereffect. Science. 1969 Oct 10;166(3902):245–247. doi: 10.1126/science.166.3902.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CRONLY-DILLON J. R. UNITS SENSITIVE TO DIRECTION OF MOVEMENT IN GOLDFISH OPTIC TECTUM. Nature. 1964 Jul 11;203:214–215. doi: 10.1038/203214a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Campbell F. W., Cleland B. G., Cooper G. F., Enroth-Cugell C. The angular selectivity of visual cortical cells to moving gratings. J Physiol. 1968 Sep;198(1):237–250. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Campbell F. W., Cooper G. F., Enroth-Cugell C. The spatial selectivity of the visual cells of the cat. J Physiol. 1969 Jul;203(1):223–235. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Campbell F. W., Kulikowski J. J. Orientational selectivity of the human visual system. J Physiol. 1966 Nov;187(2):437–445. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gilinsky A. S. Orientation-specific effects of patterns of adapting light on visual acuity. J Opt Soc Am. 1968 Jan;58(1):13–18. doi: 10.1364/josa.58.000013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962 Jan;160:106–154. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hubel D. H., Wiesel T. N. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol. 1968 Mar;195(1):215–243. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Levick W. R. Receptive fields and trigger features of ganglion cells in the visual streak of the rabbits retina. J Physiol. 1967 Feb;188(3):285–307. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MATURANA H. R., FRENK S. DIRECTIONAL MOVEMENT AND HORIZONTAL EDGE DETECTORS IN THE PIGEON RETINA. Science. 1963 Nov 15;142(3594):977–979. doi: 10.1126/science.142.3594.977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pantle A., Sekuler R. Contrast response of human visual mechanismsensitive to orientation and direction of motion. Vision Res. 1969 Mar;9(3):397–406. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(69)90087-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. RUSHTON W. A. VISUAL ADAPTATION. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1965 Mar 16;162:20–46. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1965.0024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. SCHADE O. H., Sr Optical and photoelectric analog of the eye. J Opt Soc Am. 1956 Sep;46(9):721–739. doi: 10.1364/josa.46.000721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sekuler R. W., Rubin E. L., Cushman W. H. Selectivities of human visual mechanisms for direction of movement and contour orientation. J Opt Soc Am. 1968 Aug;58(8):1146–1150. doi: 10.1364/josa.58.001146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES