Abstract
The humanized (Hu) gamma delta (γδ) T cell receptor (TCR) -T1 (γδ HuTCR-T1) mouse model represents a novel and versatile platform for investigating human-like immune responses in vivo. In this study, we assessed the adaptive and humoral immune responses of γδ HuTCR-T1 mice compared with wild-type (WT) counterparts following immunization with collagen and keratin antigens. γδ HuTCR-T1 mice exhibited markedly enhanced B cell activity, as demonstrated by a significant increase in antigen-specific antibody-secreting cells (ASCs), elevated serum titers of antigen-specific IgG, IgA, and IgE, and expansion of both plasma and memory B cell populations within spleen and blood tissues. In addition to the amplified B cell responses, γδ HuTCR-T1 mice displayed a distinct and dynamic cytokine profile, characterized by increased production of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, TGFβ, IFNγ, and TNFα, reflecting a balanced pro- and anti-inflammatory immune landscape. Importantly, serum levels of anti-ANA antibodies remained below the detection threshold. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that human γδ T cells modulate adaptive and humoral immunity through both direct cellular interactions and cytokine-driven mechanisms that promote B cell maturation, activation, and class switching. This work advances our understanding of γδ T cells as critical regulators of immune homeostasis and highlights the γδ HuTCR-T1 model as a valuable translational resource for preclinical studies.
Keywords: antibody production, antibody secreting plasma B cell, B cells, humanized γδ TCR mice, immunization
Introduction
The immune system is a highly complex network of cells and molecular pathways evolved to defend the host against infections and diseases. Among its central components are B and T cells, each performing distinct but interconnected roles. B cells are the essential effectors of an adaptive immune system and their functions that include antibody production, antigen presentation, and the generation of immunological memory (1). A specialized subset of T cells, including gamma delta (γδ) T cells, contribute to immune surveillance and occupies a niche at the interface of innate and adaptive immunity. Although γδ T cells are less abundant than their αβ T cell counterparts, they play critical roles in antibody production, early immune responses, and tumor surveillance (2–4).
The interaction between B cells and γδ T cells remains a relatively underexplored area with substantial implications for immunotherapy and vaccine development (3). γδ T cells provide “innate help” to immature B cells, facilitating their maturation into antibody-producing cells, particularly within the spleen. This support is mediated through direct cell-to-cell and cytokine signaling, influencing not only the quantity but also the specificity and quality of humoral response (3). Understanding the γδ T cell-B cell interaction could may lead to new therapeutic strategies for diseases by targeting γδ T cells to modulate B cell responses (3).
Humanized (Hu) mice bridge the gap between traditional animal models and human clinical studies. By incorporating human immune system components, these models provide a more physiologically relevant platform for studying human immune dynamics and improve the translational value of preclinical findings (5–7).
Our laboratory has generated humanized γδ T cell receptor (TCR) mice that are genetically engineered to express human γδ TCR components allowing for more relevant studies of human immune responses (8). Our recent study showed that γδ HuTCR-T1 mice exhibited a significantly higher percentage of B cells in the spleen (9). Thus, these mice can serve as invaluable tools in understanding the interactions between antigens and B cell immune responses.
For this study collagen and keratin were used as immunogens to explore B cell immune responses, leveraging their known immunogenic properties and clinical relevance. Collagen is implicated in various diseases and tissue regeneration processes (10), while keratin is important in dermatological conditions, tissue repair, and its ability to elicit robust immune responses (11). In this study, we compared B cell immune responses in γδ HuTCR-T1 and wild-type (WT) mice following immunization with collagen and keratin to investigate how humanized γδ TCR signaling influences B cell responses. By examining these immunogens, we aim to gain insight how γδ HuTCR-T1 mice modulate humoral immunity and to evaluate the potential utility of this model as a platform for studying human-relevant immune responses.
Materials and methods
Generation of gamma delta humanized T cell receptor-T1 mice
All animal experiments were conducted in compliance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocol (# 2023-1005) approved by the inGenious Protocol Committee and adhered to the guidelines of the American Veterinary Medical Association. Mice were housed in groups of three to four per cage under specific pathogen-free conditions with unrestricted access to food and water. γδ HuTCR-T1 mice were generated in house using the Ingenious TruHumanization platform (8, 9, 12).
Immunization, samples collection, and isolation of mononuclear cells
Male and female γδ HuTCR-T1 mice (6–8 weeks old) and genetic background–matched 129/C57/B6 wild-type (WT) controls were immunized via intraperitoneal injection with 30 μg per mouse per dose of either human keratin (epidermis; Sigma-Aldrich, cat. no. K0253) or human type I collagen (skin; Human Biologics, SKU: SCS1), emulsified in complete Freund’s adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. no. F5881). Booster immunizations with the antigens were emulsified in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (Sigma Aldrich, cat. # F5506) and were administered weekly for four weeks. After three days, mice were euthanized using a gradual-fill carbon dioxide inhalation method at a flow rate of 5 L/min, corresponding to 30–70% chamber volume displacement per minute. All the procedures were performed in accordance with institutional and ethical guidelines, tissues including blood and spleen were collected. Single-cell suspensions and mononuclear cells (MNCs) were prepared as described previously (9, 12).
Antibody ELISA assay
Antibody titers were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) performed with minor modifications as outlined previously (13–19). Briefly, keratin or collagen (5 µg/ml) was diluted in a coating buffer (e.g., carbonate-bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.6), 100 µL of the antigen solution was added to each well of the ELISA plate (NUNC, Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. # 442404) followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C. The coating solution was discarded and plate was washed five times with wash buffer (e.g., PBS with 0.05% Tween-20), blocked with skimmed milk (2%) prepared in PBS, and incubated for an hour at room temperature (RT). After washing, the serum samples (50 μl/well) were added in duplicates, and incubated for two hours at RT. After washing, 100 µL of goat anti-mouse HRP-conjugated IgG3 (1:1000, Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories Inc, code # 115-035-209); - IgM (1:1000, SeraCare Inc, cat. # 5220-0356); - IgG (1:1000, SeraCare Inc. cat. # 5220-0355); - IgG1 (1:1000, Southern Biotech. cat. # 1071-05); - IgGb (1:1000, Southern Biotech. cat. # 1091-05); IgGc (1:1000, Southern Biotech. cat. # 1078-05); - IgA (1:1000, Southern Biotech. cat. # 1040-05); and – IgE (1:1000, Invitrogen Inc, SA5-10263) were prepared in PBS, added, and incubated for an hour at RT. Antibody binding was detected using tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate (SeraCare Inc, cat. # 5120-0053), and the reaction was stopped with 2N sulfuric acid. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm, and antibody titers were calculated by applying the following formula:
Cut-off = average absorbance of the negative control + 3 × standard deviations of the negative control. Anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) ELISA assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Alpha Diagnostics International, Cat. # 5210).
ELISPOT (antibody-secreting cells) assay
ASCs/ELISPOT assays were performed as previously described (13–19). Briefly, 96-well ELISPOT plates were coated overnight at 4 °C with keratin or collagen at the concentration of 5 µg/ml (diluted in carbonate buffer) and blocked with 2% skimmed milk diluted in PBS for an hour at RT. MNCs were plated at the concentration of 5 × 105 per ml, centrifuged for five minutes at 500× RPM and cultured overnight at 37 °C. Media were collected and stored at -20 °C for later analysis. Spots were detected using goat anti-mouse HRP-conjugated IgG3, followed by detection with TMB substrate (SeraCare Inc, cat. # 5120-0053) containing a membrane enhancer (SeraCare Inc, cat. # 5420-0026). Plates were washed extensively between the steps with PBS. ASCs were quantified using a light microscope. Background spots from unstimulated control wells were subtracted from antigen-stimulated conditions.
Flow cytometry analysis
Murine blood and splenic MNCs were isolated under sterile conditions and processed into single-cell suspensions by mechanical dissociation, followed by red blood cell lysis using ACK buffer. Cells were washed and resuspended in staining buffer (PBS containing 0.5% BSA), and viability was assessed prior to staining. To minimize non-specific binding, cells were incubated with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 Fc receptor blocking antibody, followed by staining with a fixable viability dye to exclude dead cells. Anti-mouse antibodies for flow cytometry were purchased from Biolegend Inc., CA. Surface staining was performed using fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies against CD27 (APC/Cy7, cat. # 124225), CD138 (Syndecan-1, APC, cat. # 142505), CD267 (TACI, PE, cat. # 100214), and CD44 (FITC, cat. # 103005) for 15 minutes at 4 °C in the dark. After washing, samples were acquired on a Novocyte flow cytometer. Compensation was performed using single-stained controls, and fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls were included for CD138, CD267, and CD44 to accurately define gating boundaries. Appropriate isotype-matched controls were included in all analyzes. Data acquisition was performed by collecting 50,000 events per sample using Novocyte® Flow Cytometer (ACEA Biosciences Inc, San Diego, CA, USA) and data were analyzed using Novo Express® software. Cells were sequentially gated as lymphocytes based on forward and side scatter, singlets, and live cells, followed by exclusion of CD3+ T cells. Antibody-secreting plasma B cells were identified as CD138+CD267+CD44+ cells. The combination of CD138+CD267+CD44+ provides a more comprehensive and specific phenotypic definition of antibody-secreting cells, capturing both early plasmablasts and mature plasma cells while minimizing contamination from non-activated B cell subsets.
Cytokine determination from serum samples
Cytokine levels in serum samples were measured using commercially available ELISA kits, according to manufacturer’s instructions. The following anti-mouse ELISA kits were used [interleukin/(IL)-4 (cat #88-7044-86), IL-6 (cat. # 88-7064-88), IL-10 (cat. # 88-7105-88), tumor necrosis factor alpha/(TNFα) (cat. # 88-7324-88), IL-17A/F (cat. # 88-8711-22), interferon gamma/(IFNγ) (cat. # 88-7314-88), and TGFβ (cat. # 88-8350-88)]. All purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyzes were performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.2 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). Log10-transformed isotype ELISA antibody titers were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple-range test for post hoc comparison. Correlation analysis was performed using Spearman’s nonparametric correlation method. Data are presented as the mean numbers of antigen-specific antibody-secreting cells per 5 × 105 MNCs and using a nonparametric t-test (Mann-Whitney). Error bars represent the standard errors of the means (SEM, n = 7-10), and a P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Gamma delta humanized T cell receptor mice show enhanced antibody-secreting cells response and serum antibody titers following keratin and collagen immunizations
This study assessed the immune responses to keratin and collagen immunization in γδ humanized T cell receptor- T1 (γδ HuTCR-T1) mice compared to wild-type (WT) controls. Four weeks post immunization with keratin and collagen, γδ HuTCR-T1 mice showed a significantly higher number of antigen-specific IgG3 antibody secreting cells (ASCs) in both peripheral blood and splenic cells compared to WT mice (Figures 1A, B). Notably, the numbers of keratin-specific IgG3 ASCs in blood were correlated with their splenic counterparts (R = 0.5, P = 0.02) γδ HuTCR-T1 mice (R = 0.4, P = 0.04). In addition, γδ HuTCR-T1 mice demonstrated significantly elevated numbers of antigen-specific IgM ASCs in splenic cells relative to WT controls (Figure 1C). Keratin-specific IgG3 ASCs in the spleen were correlated with keratin-specific IgM ASCs (R = 0.5, P = 0.03), and a similar correlation was observed for collagen-specific IgG3 ASCs and IgM ASCs of splenic cells in γδ HuTCR-T1 mice (R = 0.4, P = 0.02). Antigen-specific IgM ASCs were below the detection limit in blood cells.
Figure 1.
Humanized (Hu) gamma delta (γδ) T cell receptor (TCR)-T1 mice exhibit elevated antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) responses and increased serum antibody (Ab) levels after keratin and collagen immunization. Mean numbers of antigen-specific IgG3 ASCs in blood (A), mean numbers of antigen-specific IgG3 (B) and antigen-specific IgM ASCs in spleen (C). Data represent the mean numbers of antigen-specific ASCs per 5 × 105 mononuclear cells (MNCs) and were analyzed using a nonparametric t-test (Mann-Whitney). Geometric mean titers (GMT) of antigens-specific IgG3 (D), -IgM (E), -IgG2b (F), -IgG2c (G), -IgA (H), -IgG (I), and -IgE (J) antibody (Ab) titers in serum. Log10-transformed isotype ELISA Ab titers were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple-range test. Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 7-11) for the γδ versus the wild-type (WT) mice and significant differences are indicated as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Consistent with the ASCs data, serum levels of antigen-specific IgG3 and - IgM Ab titers were significantly elevated in γδ HuTCR-T1 mice compared with WT mice (Figures 1D, E). Moreover, collagen and keratin-specific IgG3 Ab titers were significantly correlated with their respective IgM Ab titers in γδ HuTCR-T1 mice (R = 0.2, P = 0.03; R = 0.6, P = 0.05, respectively).
Additionally, γδ HuTCR-T1 mice displayed increased titers of additional Ab isotypes, including antigen-specific IgG2b,c, IgA, IgG, and IgE titers when compared to WT controls (Figures 1F–J). Antigens-specific IgG1 Ab titers were comparable among the groups notably, while anti-ANA Ab titers were undetectable in sera (data not shown). Collectively, these findings indicate that γδ HuTCR-T1 mice have enhanced immune responses compared to WT mice, as evidenced by increased frequencies of antigen-specific ASCs and higher serum Ab titers following immunization with keratin and collagen.
Collagen and keratin immunizations increased the frequencies of memory and antibody-secreting plasma B cells in γδ HuTCR-T1 mice
Antigen immunization (CD138+CD27+) led to a significant increase in the proportions of memory B cells in spleen and blood MNCs of γδ HuTCR-T1 mice compared with WT controls (Figures 2A–D; Supplementary Figure 1). This increase in B cell subsets coincided with enhanced antigen-specific ASCs and higher serum Ab titers.
Figure 2.
Antigens immunization increases the frequencies of memory B cells in humanized (Hu) gamma delta (γδ) T cell receptor (TCR)-T1 mice. Mean frequencies of memory (CD138+CD27+) B cells among the blood and splenic mononuclear cells (MNCs) in collagen and keratin (A–D) immunized mice. Flow cytometry analysis showing dot plots for blood (C) and splenic MNCs (D). Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 7-11) and were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple-range test for the γδ versus the wild-type (WT) mice and significant differences are indicated as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Antibody-secreting plasma B cells were identified as CD138+CD267+CD44+ cells. Similarly, the percentage of these cells was significantly higher in splenic and blood MNCs of γδ HuTCR-T1 mice following immunization than in WT mice (Figures 3A–C; Supplementary Figure 2). Together, these results demonstrated that γδ HuTCR-T1 mice exhibit a heightened antibody-secreting plasma B cell response following immunization, suggesting an enhanced capacity to mount antigen-specific humoral immunity.
Figure 3.
Antigens immunization elevates the frequencies of antibody-secreting plasma B cells in humanized (Hu) gamma delta (γδ) T cell receptor (TCR) mice. Mean frequencies of antibody-secreting plasma B cells (CD138+CD267+CD44+) in splenic and blood mononuclear cells (MNCs) of collagen and keratin immunized mice (A–C). Flow cytometry analysis showing dot plots for splenic MNCs (C). Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 7-11) and were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple-range test for the γδ versus the wild-type (WT) mice and significant differences are indicated as **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Keratin and collagen immunizations enhanced the cytokines levels in serum of γδ HuTCR-T1 mice
To assess immunoregulatory and pro-inflammatory responses elicited by antigen immunization, we measured serum cytokine concentrations by ELISA assay. Keratin and collagen immunizations significantly increased levels of key immunoregulatory cytokines, including IL-4, IL-10, and TGFβ (Figures 4A–D), as well as pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IFNγ, TNFα, IL-6, and IL-17 (Figures 4E–G). These findings indicate that immunization with keratin and collagen induces a robust and mixed cytokine milieu in γδ HuTCR-T1 mice, characterized by concurrent upregulation of immunoregulatory and pro-inflammatory mediators. However, the functional consequences of these cytokine changes on immune regulation and B cell responses require further experimental validation.
Figure 4.
Antigens immunization increases the levels of immunoregulatory and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the serum of humanized (Hu) gamma delta (γδ) T cell receptor (TCR) mice. Levels of immunoregulatory [(e.g., interleukin (IL)-4 (A), IL-6 (B), IL-10 (C) and TGFβ (D)] and pro-inflammatory [(e.g., IFNγ (E), TNFα (F), and IL-17 (G)] cytokines in serum. Levels of cytokines were determined by ELISA assay. Data are shown as means ± SEM (n = 7-11) and were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple-range test for the γδ versus the wild-type (WT) mice and significant differences are indicated as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Discussion
The immune system’s ability to recognize and respond to diverse antigens and pathogens relies on a highly coordinated interplay among multiple immune cell subsets, with B cells and T cells serving as central mediators. Within this framework, γδ T cells have emerged as key modulators bridging innate and adaptive immunity, capable of rapidly sensing stress signals and orchestrating downstream immune responses. However, the complexity of human γδ T cell biology has remained challenging to study due to the lack of physiologically relevant in vivo models. To address this gap, we developed a humanized γδ TCR mouse model, termed γδ HuTCR-T1, which harbors a fully functional human immune system. In this study, we utilized this model to investigate B-cell immune responses and balanced cytokine profiles, providing novel insights into the regulatory roles of γδ T cells in shaping adaptive immunity.
To achieve humanization of the mouse γδ TCR, we performed extensive genetic engineering on both the mouse γ and δ loci (8). While it is challenging to precisely pinpoint which specific genetic alterations are directly responsible for the observed B-cell immune responses, we propose several hypotheses that may help explain the experimental outcomes observed in our γδ HuTCR-T1 mice.
In the normal mouse spleen, the largest population of γδ T cells expresses Vγ1, followed by Vγ4 (20). Extensive studies have shown that these subsets play a critical role in regulating B-cell immune responses and often exert opposing effects on host immunity, influencing responses to infection, allergic inflammation, and malignancy (21–24). This functional opposition suggests that Vγ1 and Vγ4 subsets act in a counterbalancing manner to modify overall immune homeostasis (25). Insights from Vγ1-/-, Vγ4-/-, and Vδ-/- mouse models further highlight the importance of γδ T cells in antibody regulation: deletion of all γδ T cells (Vδ-/-) caused a ~2-fold reduction in total serum Ig compared to WT, while Vγ1-/- mice exhibited a 6-fold decrease, and conversely, deletion of Vγ4 or Vγ6 led to a 4-fold Ig increase. These changes extended across multiple Ig subclasses (IgM, IgG1, IgG2b, IgE) and autoantibodies, with Vγ1-/- mice showing a 2-fold reduction in autoantibody production, whereas Vγ4-/- and Vγ6-/- mice displayed a striking 10-15-fold increase (26). Importantly, these findings were obtained in immune-unprimed mice, underscoring the intrinsic role of γδ T cells in maintaining baseline B-cell activity and antibody homeostasis. To investigate human γδ T cell biology, we engineered the γδ HuTCR-T1 mouse model, replacing the endogenous mouse Vγ1 gene with human Vγ9, Vγ10, and Vγ11 segments; notably, human Vγ9 was inserted downstream of the mouse Vγ1 promoter, allowing its expression to mimic native Vγ1, while Vγ10 and Vγ11 retained their own human promoters. On the δ locus, we replaced mouse Vδ4, along with associated D and J segments, with human Vδ1-Vδ8 variable regions and corresponding human D and J elements, enabling γδ HuTCR-T1 mice to generate fully human γδ TCRs with physiologically relevant human CDR3 sequences (8). Baseline measurements in non-immunized HuTCR-T1 and WT mice had been performed. These data demonstrate that the baseline levels of the parameters analyzed including ASCs, cytokines, and B cell subsets were below the detection limit in HuTCR-T1 and WT mice. Following immunization, the enhanced responses observed in HuTCR-T1 mice are therefore attributable to the immunization rather than pre-existing elevated baseline levels (9). In addition, it suggested that the introduction of human γδ TCR elements compensates for the deletion of mouse Vγ1, restoring Ig regulation despite the sixfold Ig reduction observed in Vγ1-/- mice (27). This restoration is unexpected, given the minimal sequence homology between human and mouse γδ TCRs and the difficulty of aligning Vγ and Vδ gene segments across species. One plausible explanation is that the functional interaction between γδ TCRs and their ligands or binding partners which influences B-cell activation and Ig production is evolutionarily conserved despite sequence divergence. Supporting this idea, previous studies suggested that human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells exhibit functional similarities to mouse Vγ1 T cells in responding to specific antigens (28, 29). Consistent with this, our γδ HuTCR-T1 mice, which carry human Vγ9 and Vδ2 elements, may effectively recapitulate Vγ1-like immune regulation within a humanized immune context (8).
Compared to WT controls, γδ HuTCR-T1 mice showed increased frequencies of ASCs, elevated titers of antigen-specific IgA, IgE, IgG, IgG2, and IgG3 Ab titers and an expansion of plasma and memory B cell. These findings suggest that human γδ TCR expression may have promoted stronger B cell activation, class switching, and Ab production, potentially through cytokine that may have mediated help or direct cell-cell interactions (30–33). The enhanced isotypes distribution may indicates roles in mucosal, allergic, and inflammatory immunity, consistent with a more mature and effective humoral immune response than in WT mice, which may have retained a higher proportion of naïve B cells indicating these mice are less mature, less effective, and less adapted to antigens exposure (34–36). In humans, protein-based immunization (e.g., influenza, tetanus, or hepatitis B vaccines) typically induces robust germinal center reactions, expansion of ASCs, and the generation of long-lived memory B cells and antibody-secreting plasma B cells, similar to what we observed in γδ HuTCR-T1 mice (37, 38). Therefore, our findings indicate that the presence of human γδ TCRs significantly amplifies the activity of B cells upon antigen exposure, suggesting it may have a promising avenue for preclinical research (39–41).
The robust adaptive response was accompanied by elevated serum levels of immunoregulatory and pro-inflammatory cytokines were observed in γδ HuTCR-T1 mice. This suggest that γδ TCR signaling plays a critical role in mixed cytokine response that may modulate B cell responses, offering new insights into the interplay between γδ T cells and B cells in the context of immunization (3, 31, 42–47). Our results are consistent with previous studies showing finding that γδ T cells secrete IL-4, TGFβ, and IL-10 can help B cells to differentiate into plasma and memory B cells and Abs production (27, 31, 48–52).
In addition, γδ T cells have been reported in previous studies to influence humoral immunity through multiple mechanisms, including cytokine production (e.g., IL-4, IL-10, IL-21) and modulation of T follicular helper cell differentiation, which in turn supports B cell activation and immunoglobulin production (48, 53). Moreover, γδT-cells express key mediators that interacts with B-cells, including inducible costimulatory molecule, chemokine receptor 5, programmed cell death-1 protein, and CD40L (54, 55). In these contexts, it is plausible that γδHuTCR-T1 cells may contribute to enhanced antibody responses either directly through interactions with B cells or indirectly via shaping the helper T cell environment. The definitive demonstration of direct B cell effect would require additional functional experiments, such as co-culture assays, cytokine blockade, or adoptive transfer studies. Additionally, humanized γδ TCR is expressed in murine γδ T cells may be under the control of endogenous regulatory elements. Thus, the majority of murine γδ T cells in these mice express the human γδ TCR, while other immune cell populations remain unmodified (9). γδ T cells are known to reside in both lymphoid and peripheral tissues (56) and the presence and proportion of γδ HuTCR-T1 expressing T cells in key tissues, including spleen, blood, lymph nodes, lung, thymus, ileum, and liver has been previously reported (9). It confirms that humanized γδ T cells are present in these tissues where they can influence immune responses through cytokine production and interactions with B and T cells. However, the observed immune changes are associated with the presence of humanized γδ TCR-expressing cells, and that further mechanistic studies (e.g., depletion or adoptive transfer approaches) will be required to definitively establish their functional role.
Notably, anti-ANA antibodies remained undetectable in sera of γδ HuTCR-T1 mice despite the robust keratin and collagen immunizations. This suggests that the augmented γδ T cells may helped in this model preferentially expanded B-cell clones specific for the immunizing antigens. The functional implications of these cytokine changes remain to be determined, and that additional mechanistic studies will be necessary to establish their biological significance.
Interestingly, TCRγδ deficient mice are associated with reduced total serum Ig levels and a reduction in anti-chromatin antibody production, along with altered immunoglobulin subclass composition characterized by reduced IgA and IgE levels suggesting a dampening of certain autoreactive B cell responses (27, 48). In contrast, γδ HuTCR-T1 mice where murine Vγ1 was replaced with human Vγ9–11 did not show reduced responses. Instead, keratin and collagen immunizations elicited stronger antigen-specific immunity than WT without inducing pathological autoantibodies. This difference may reflect intrinsic distinctions between human and murine γδ TCR repertoires, cytokine profiles, or accessory cell interactions in the humanized context. Therefore, this model offers valuable insights into the regulator role of γδ T cells in immunity and closely mimics human immune responses, making it a promising tool for advancing treatments/therapeutics for various diseases, infections, cancer (44, 57, 58).
Limitation
While humanized γδ HuTCR-T1 mice provide a valuable model for studying enhanced B cell immune responses following immunization with collagen and keratin, several limitations must be acknowledged. First, species-specific differences which may not fully recapitulate the complexity of human immune responses. Second, smaller number of γδ double homozygous mice, which does not allow us to perform several analytical analyzes such as examining sex and age, which can impact the interpretation and application of findings. Third, the observed immunological changes are correlative and occur in the context of the humanized γδ TCR expressing environment, rather than representing direct mechanistic proof of cell-specific function. Thus, γδ T cells may influence immune responses, including cytokine-mediated effects and modulation of helper T cell responses.
Future directions
Future research should aim to focus on elucidating the precise mechanisms by which γδ TCR humanization enhances B cell responses. Key areas (or components) include the direct interactions between γδ T cells and B cells, the role of specific cytokines, and the signaling pathways involved. Furthermore, evaluating immune responses across multiple time points and assessing long-term immunity following various immunization protocols would provide deeper insight into how humanized γδ T cells influence the magnitude and persistence of immune responses in γδ HuTCR-T1 mice.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our study demonstrates that humanization of the γδ TCR enhances B cell responses to keratin and collagen immunizations as evidenced by increased antigen-specific Ab titers, elevated frequencies of plasma and memory B cells, and a cytokine profile favoring immune activation. γδ HuTCR-T1 mice thus represent a promising model for studying adaptive and humoral immunity. These findings pave the way for further exploration of γδ T cell- B cell cross talk and highlight the potential of this model for advancing preclinical research.
Acknowledgments
We thank Sulma P. Claros, Kristine Nelson, Jenna Wasp, and Andrew Magnuson for their technical and animal care assistance.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Footnotes
Edited by: Paolo Casali, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, United States
Reviewed by: Alessandro Poggi, University of Genoa, Italy
José Pablo Romero-López, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico
Data availability statement
The datasets generated for this study can be found here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20430607.
Ethics statement
The animal study was approved by the inGenious Protocol Committee and adhered to the guidelines of the American Veterinary Medical Association. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
HM: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Data curation, Visualization, Conceptualization, Validation. MP: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Data curation, Methodology. GW: Methodology, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. MV: Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. EC: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. PS: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Project administration. WW: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1734493/full#supplementary-material
References
- 1. Hoffman W, Lakkis FG, Chalasani G. B cells, antibodies, and more. Clin J Am Soc Nephrology: CJASN. (2016) 11:137–54. doi: 10.2215/cjn.09430915 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Sarvaria A, Madrigal JA, Saudemont A. B cell regulation in cancer and anti-tumor immunity. Cell Mol Immunol. (2017) 14:662–74. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2017.35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Rampoldi F, Ullrich L, Prinz I. Revisiting the interaction of gammadelta T-cells and B-cells. Cells. (2020) 9:743. doi: 10.3390/cells9030743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Kumar BV, Connors TJ, Farber DL. Human T cell development, localization, and function throughout life. Immunity. (2018) 48:202–13. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.01.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Allen TM, Brehm MA, Bridges S, Ferguson S, Kumar P, Mirochnitchenko O, et al. Humanized immune system mouse models: progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat Immunol. (2019) 20:770–4. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0416-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Karnik I, Her Z, Neo SH, Liu WN, Chen Q. Emerging preclinical applications of humanized mouse models in the discovery and validation of novel immunotherapeutics and their mechanisms of action for improved cancer treatment. Pharmaceutics. (2023) 15:1600. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15061600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Mukherjee P, Roy S, Ghosh D, Nandi SK. Role of animal models in biomedical research: a review. Lab Anim Res. (2022) 38:18. doi: 10.1186/s42826-022-00128-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Weng W. Genetically modified non-human having humanized gamma and delta TCR variable genes. In: Patent application publication US20240114883A1. The United States of America: (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 9. Michael H, Weng GW, Vallas MM, Lovos D, Chen E, Sheiffele P, et al. Metabolomics analysis reveals resembling metabolites between humanized gammadelta TCR mice and human plasma. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:29321. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81003-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Wang H. A review of the effects of collagen treatment in clinical studies. Polymers. (2021) 13:3868. doi: 10.3390/polym13223868 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Piipponen M, Li D, Landen NX. The immune functions of keratinocytes in skin wound healing. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 21:8790. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Michael H, Lenihan AT, Vallas MM, Weng GW, Barber J, He W, et al. The cytotoxic potential of humanized gammadelta T cells against human cancer cell lines in in vitro. Cells. (2025) 14:1197. doi: 10.3390/cells14151197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kumar A, Vlasova AN, Liu Z, Chattha KS, Kandasamy S, Esseili M, et al. In vivo gut transcriptome responses to Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Lactobacillus acidophilus in neonatal gnotobiotic piglets. Gut Microbes. (2014) 5:152–64. doi: 10.4161/gmic.27877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kandasamy S, Vlasova AN, Fischer D, Kumar A, Chattha KS, Rauf A, et al. Differential effects of Escherichia coli Nissle and Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG on human rotavirus binding, infection, and B cell immunity. J Immunol. (2016) 196:1780–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501705 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Fischer DD, Kandasamy S, Paim FC, Langel SN, Alhamo MA, Shao L, et al. Protein malnutrition alters tryptophan and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 homeostasis and adaptive immune responses in human rotavirus-infected gnotobiotic pigs with human infant fecal microbiota transplant. Clin Vaccine Immunol. (2017) 24:e00172-17. doi: 10.1128/cvi.00172-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kandasamy S, Chattha KS, Vlasova AN, Saif LJ. Prenatal vitamin A deficiency impairs adaptive immune responses to pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (RotaTeq(R)) in a neonatal gnotobiotic pig model. Vaccine. (2014) 32:816–24. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.12.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Chattha KS, Kandasamy S, Vlasova AN, Saif LJ. Vitamin A deficiency impairs adaptive B and T cell responses to a prototype monovalent attenuated human rotavirus vaccine and virulent human rotavirus challenge in a gnotobiotic piglet model. PloS One. (2013) 8:e82966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082966 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Michael H, Langel SN, Miyazaki A, Paim FC, Chepngeno J, Alhamo MA, et al. Malnutrition decreases antibody secreting cell numbers induced by an oral attenuated human rotavirus vaccine in a human infant fecal microbiota transplanted gnotobiotic pig model. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:196. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Michael H, Paim FC, Langel SN, Miyazaki A, Fischer DD, Chepngeno J, et al. Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 enhances innate and adaptive immune responses in a ciprofloxacin-treated defined-microbiota piglet model of human rotavirus infection. mSphere. (2021) 6:e00074-21. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00074-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Sperling AI, Cron RQ, Decker DC, Stern DA, Bluestone JA. Peripheral T cell receptor gamma delta variable gene repertoire maps to the T cell receptor loci and is influenced by positive selection. J Immunol. (1992) 149:3200–7. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.149.10.3200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Huber SA, Graveline D, Newell MK, Born WK, O'Brien RL. V gamma 1+ T cells suppress and V gamma 4+ T cells promote susceptibility to coxsackievirus B3-induced myocarditis in mice. J Immunol. (2000) 165:4174–81. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.8.4174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Huang Y, Jin N, Roark CL, Aydintug MK, Wands JM, Huang H, et al. The influence of IgE-enhancing and IgE-suppressive gammadelta T cells changes with exposure to inhaled ovalbumin. J Immunol. (2009) 183:849–55. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0804104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Hahn YS, Taube C, Jin N, Sharp L, Wands JM, Aydintug MK, et al. Different potentials of gamma delta T cell subsets in regulating airway responsiveness: V gamma 1+ cells, but not V gamma 4+ cells, promote airway hyperreactivity, Th2 cytokines, and airway inflammation. J Immunol. (2004) 172:2894–902. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.5.2894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Hao J, Dong S, Xia S, He W, Jia H, Zhang S, et al. Regulatory role of Vgamma1 gammadelta T cells in tumor immunity through IL-4 production. J Immunol. (2011) 187:4979–86. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Born WK, Huang Y, Jin N, Huang H, O'Brien RL. Balanced approach of gammadelta T cells to type 2 immunity. Immunol Cell Biol. (2010) 88:269–74. doi: 10.1038/icb.2009.105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Ullrich L, Lueder Y, Juergens AL, Wilharm A, Barros-Martins J, Bubke A, et al. IL-4-producing Vgamma1(+)/Vdelta6(+) gammadelta T cells sustain germinal center reactions in Peyer's patches of mice. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:729607. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.729607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Huang Y, Heiser RA, Detanico TO, Getahun A, Kirchenbaum GA, Casper TL, et al. Gammadelta T cells affect IL-4 production and B-cell tolerance. PNAS. (2015) 112:E39–48. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415107111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Russano AM, Agea E, Corazzi L, Postle AD, De Libero G, Porcelli S, et al. Recognition of pollen-derived phosphatidyl-ethanolamine by human CD1d-restricted gamma delta T cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2006) 117:1178–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Spinozzi F, Agea E, Bistoni O, Forenza N, Bertotto A. Gamma delta T cells, allergen recognition and airway inflammation. Immunol Today. (1998) 19:22–6. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5699(97)01182-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Born WK, Huang Y, Reinhardt RL, Huang H, Sun D, O'Brien RL. Gammadelta T cells and B cells. Adv Immunol. (2017) 134:1–45. doi: 10.1016/bs.ai.2017.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Caccamo N, Battistini L, Bonneville M, Poccia F, Fournie JJ, Meraviglia S, et al. CXCR5 identifies a subset of Vgamma9Vdelta2 T cells which secrete IL-4 and IL-10 and help B cells for antibody production. J Immunol. (2006) 177:5290–5. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.8.5290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Suarez-Fueyo A, Bradley SJ, Tsokos GC. T cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Opin Immunol. (2016) 43:32–8. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2016.09.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Zhang X, Wang Q, Bi Y, Kou Z, Zhou J, Cui Y, et al. Kinetics of memory B cell and plasma cell responses in the mice immunized with plague vaccines. Scand J Immunol. (2014) 79:157–62. doi: 10.1111/sji.12146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Brennecke AM, Duber S, Roy B, Thomsen I, Garbe AI, Klawonn F, et al. Induced B cell development in adult mice. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:2483. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Qu G, Wang S, Zhou Z, Jiang D, Liao A, Luo J. Comparing mouse and human tissue-resident gammadelta T cells. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:891687. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.891687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Vantourout P, Hayday A. Six-of-the-best: unique contributions of gammadelta T cells to immunology. Nat Rev Immunol. (2013) 13:88–100. doi: 10.1038/nri3384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Plotkin SA. Correlates of protection induced by vaccination. Clin Vaccine Immunol. (2010) 17:1055–65. doi: 10.1128/cvi.00131-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Turner JS, Zhou JQ, Han J, Schmitz AJ, Rizk AA, Alsoussi WB, et al. Human germinal centres engage memory and naive B cells after influenza vaccination. Nature. (2020) 586:127–32. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2711-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Sok D, Briney B, Jardine JG, Kulp DW, Menis S, Pauthner M, et al. Priming HIV-1 broadly neutralizing antibody precursors in human Ig loci transgenic mice. Science. (2016) 353:1557–60. doi: 10.1126/science.aah3945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Pantophlet R, Trattnig N, Murrell S, Lu N, Chau D, Rempel C, et al. Bacterially derived synthetic mimetics of mammalian oligomannose prime antibody responses that neutralize HIV infectivity. Nat Commun. (2017) 8:1601. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01640-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Walls AC, Fiala B, Schafer A, Wrenn S, Pham MN, Murphy M, et al. Elicitation of potent neutralizing antibody responses by designed protein nanoparticle vaccines for SARS-CoV-2. bioRxiv: Preprint Server For Biol. (2020). doi: 10.1101/2020.08.11.247395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Horner AA, Jabara H, Ramesh N, Geha RS. Gamma/delta T lymphocytes express CD40 ligand and induce isotype switching in B lymphocytes. J Exp Med. (1995) 181:1239–47. doi: 10.1084/jem.181.3.1239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Wen L, Roberts SJ, Viney JL, Wong FS, Mallick C, Findly RC, et al. Immunoglobulin synthesis and generalized autoimmunity in mice congenitally deficient in alpha beta(+) T cells. Nature. (1994) 369:654–8. doi: 10.1038/369654a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Hu Y, Hu Q, Li Y, Lu L, Xiang Z, Yin Z, et al. Gammadelta T cells: origin and fate, subsets, diseases and immunotherapy. Signal Transduction Targeted Ther. (2023) 8:434. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01653-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Mitsdoerffer M, Lee Y, Jager A, Kim HJ, Korn T, Kolls JK, et al. Proinflammatory T helper type 17 cells are effective B-cell helpers. PNAS. (2010) 107:14292–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009234107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Alspach E, Lussier DM, Schreiber RD. Interferon gamma and its important roles in promoting and inhibiting spontaneous and therapeutic cancer immunity. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol. (2019) 11:a028480. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Jang DI, Lee AH, Shin HY, Song HR, Park JH, Kang TB, et al. The role of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) in autoimmune disease and current TNF-alpha inhibitors in therapeutics. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:2719. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052719 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Rampoldi F, Donato E, Ullrich L, Deseke M, Janssen A, Demera A, et al. Gammadelta T cells license immature B cells to produce a broad range of polyreactive antibodies. Cell Rep. (2022) 39:110854. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110854 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Gorczynski RM, Chen Z, Hoang Y, Rossi-Bergman B. A subset of gamma delta T-cell receptor-positive cells produce T-helper type-2 cytokines and regulate mouse skin graft rejection following portal venous pretransplant preimmunization. Immunology. (1996) 87:381–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1996.481554.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Mauri C, Menon M. Human regulatory B cells in health and disease: therapeutic potential. J Clin Invest. (2017) 127:772–9. doi: 10.1172/jci85113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Komai T, Inoue M, Okamura T, Morita K, Iwasaki Y, Sumitomo S, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta and interleukin-10 synergistically regulate humoral immunity via modulating metabolic signals. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:1364. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01364 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Michee-Cospolite M, Boudigou M, Grasseau A, Simon Q, Mignen O, Pers JO, et al. Molecular mechanisms driving IL-10- producing B cells functions: STAT3 and c-MAF as underestimated central key regulators? Front Immunol. (2022) 13:818814. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.818814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Mohammed SS, Alkhalifah AKS, Mirza R, Okinedo S-P, Inampudi RA, Bibi A, et al. Follicular helper-like γδ T cells promote plasma cell differentiation in Behçet’s disease. Front Immunol. (2026) 17:1763174. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1763174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Chen Y, Yu M, Zheng Y, Fu G, Xin G, Zhu W, et al. CXCR5+PD-1+ follicular helper CD8 T cells control B cell tolerance. Nat Commun. (2019) 10:4415. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12446-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. He J, Tsai LM, Leong YA, Hu X, Ma CS, Chevalier N, et al. Circulating precursor CCR7(lo)PD-1(hi) CXCR5+ CD4+ T cells indicate Tfh cell activity and promote antibody responses upon antigen reexposure. Immunity. (2013) 39:770–81. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.09.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Giri S, Lal G. Differentiation and functional plasticity of gamma-delta (γδ) T cells under homeostatic and disease conditions. Mol Immunol. (2021) 136:138–49. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2021.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Schonefeldt S, Wais T, Herling M, Mustjoki S, Bekiaris V, Moriggl R, et al. The diverse roles of gammadelta T cells in cancer: From rapid immunity to aggressive lymphoma. Cancers. (2021) 13:6212. doi: 10.3390/cells9020462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Bank I. The role of gamma delta T cells in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Cells. (2020) 9:462. doi: 10.3390/cells9020462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated for this study can be found here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20430607.




