Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2026 Jun 17;17:1807060. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1807060

Multi-omics analysis reveals the potential for fermented Cordyceps militaris mushroom substrate in laying hens

Hailong Zhang 1, Lili Ma 1, Li Jia 1, Yujing Li 1, Yuxin Wang 1, Wenwen Wang 1, Wenting Wu 1, Hai Wang 1, Hongjie Li 1, Yaxiong Zhang 1, Guoshun Chen 2, Ke Hou 2, Jinjie Dong 1,*
PMCID: PMC13318908  PMID: 42388305

Abstract

This study examines how varying levels of fermented Cordyceps militaris mushroom substrate (CMMS) in laying hen diets affect production performance, digestive health, immunity, cecal microbiota, metabolites, and quorum-sensing functions. Fermentation reduced CMMS dry matter, NDF, and phosphorus content (p < 0.05). Replacing 30% of the diet with fermented CMMS significantly improved laying rate, egg weight, feed intake, and feed efficiency (p < 0.05), while enhancing yolk color, Haugh units, and lipase activity. A 20% substitution increased nutrient digestibility and immunoglobulin levels (p < 0.05). Metagenomic analysis revealed increased abundance of Phocaeicola, Alistipes, and Parabacteroides (p < 0.05) with enhanced energy metabolism and specific gene families. Metabolomic analysis identified 1,529 differentially expressed metabolites, with carboxylic acids being most prevalent (21.20%), and enhanced taurine/hypotaurine metabolism and GPI-anchor biosynthesis. Parabacteroides showed negative correlations with certain metabolites, while Alistipes correlated positively with PemK/MazF family genes (p < 0.001). CMMS fermented feed proportions influence cecal microbiota, their metabolites, and quorum sensing in laying hens, affecting production, digestibility, immunity, metabolism, and health, demonstrating CMMS potential as alternative poultry nutrition.

Keywords: laying hens, metabolomics, metagenomics, production performance, quorum sensing

Introduction

Chickens are one of the most widely farmed animals in the world, providing humans with large quantities of meat and eggs. It is estimated that the global chicken population exceeded 60 billion in 2021 (Feng et al., 2021). The gastrointestinal tract of chickens is home to a large number of microorganisms, and their importance to the health and metabolism of the host has been recognized (Bindari and Gerber, 2022). The majority of these microbial organisms are bacterial species, which fall into three main categories: symbiotic bacteria, pathogenic bacteria, and “probiotics.” The structural traits and social habits of these microorganisms are influenced by a variety of factors, including their hereditary makeup, the age of the organism they inhabit, their surroundings, the food they consume, and the addition of dietary supplements (Aruwa et al., 2021; Dai et al., 2022; Pandit et al., 2018). Notably, alterations in these microecological elements have been confirmed to exert a direct impact on the health status and production traits of poultry (Baxter et al., 2021; Sasaki et al., 2014; Ndlebe et al., 2023), indicating that a distinct correlation exists between intestinal microbiota and the health and production performance of poultry. As an illustration, relevant research has revealed that broiler chickens with high feed conversion ratios (FCR) and those with low FCR exhibit differences in bacterial abundance (Stanley et al., 2014). Production performance-related parameters including breeding density, as well as the protein and energy percentages in the diet are capable of regulating key microbiome components involved in nutritional processes and metabolic activities. In turn, this regulation affects the growth of the host and the efficiency of feed utilization (McKenna et al., 2020). Therefore, gaining a comprehensive understanding of the intestinal microbiome in chickens is of great significance for enhancing their health level and production capacity. Studies indicate that incorporating probiotics into one’s diet can significantly influence the makeup of gut bacteria, thereby decreasing susceptibility to disease. Additionally, the inclusion of plant-based feed components has demonstrated the ability to shape the intestinal microbial community, ultimately enhancing poultry health (Sayed et al., 2023; Joo et al., 2022; Shi et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2019).

Nevertheless, prior to optimizing the intestinal microbiota of chickens, a thorough comprehension of the gut microbiota itself and the interactions among its constituent members is essential. Quorum-sensing (QS) systems refer to the biological process where bacteria pump out signaling molecules that enable them to gauge the local population density and regulate specific gene expression accordingly (Federle and Bassler, 2003). Numerous physiological and biochemical processes of bacteria, including bioluminescence emission, biofilm formation, bacterial pathogenicity, spore creation, conjugation processes, and bacteriocin synthesis, have been shown to be modulated by the QS phenomenon (Lowery et al., 2008). Relevant research has also indicated that autoinducer-2 (AI-2) plays a pivotal role in mediating intercellular communication within microbial communities, and this signaling molecule is extensively employed by both gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial species (Xu and Liu, 2011). Previous research has created a metagenomic dataset of the intestinal microbiota of chickens and demonstrated how some drugs affect chicken growth (Foley and Grant, 2007; Gilroy et al., 2021). Moreover, the gut flora in chickens is incredibly diverse and influenced by their location, stage in life, gender, and how they are nourished, all factors that play a significant role in the chickens’ well-being and their efficiency as producers (Rychlik, 2020). Yet, we are still in the dark about how the gut bacteria of chickens on various diets vary in terms of their makeup and how they work. Plus, there’s a whole lot less insight into what types of bugs and functions are lurking in hens’ digestive tracts.

The shortage and rising prices of conventional feed resources are one of the challenges facing the livestock industry (Li, 2023). Therefore, the development of unconventional feed has become an interesting topic in livestock research (Santoso and Setiadi, 2016), including the distillers’ grains (Li et al., 2025b), straw (Li et al., 2025b), and cottonseed meals (Zhang et al., 2024). However, these unconventional feed resources have certain disadvantages, such as high crude fiber content and the presence of antinutritional factors (Natesh et al., 2017; Cheng et al., 2022).

Cordyceps militaris (CM) stands out as a consumable fungus that falls within the Cordycepitaceae family, and it’s been a staple in traditional medicine for ages, thanks to its impressive nutritional and medicinal properties (Liu et al., 2016; Das et al., 2010). CMMS is a by-product of CM cultivation, mainly composed of CM mycelium and fermented wheat (Guo et al., 2010), and is a high-quality, renewable, unconventional feed. However, whether CMMS can be used as a feed resource in egg production and its mechanism of action remains unclear. Hence, the investigation delved into the alterations in the gut bacteria composition, specific functions, and resulting metabolites within Hy-Line Brown laying hens, using various concentrations of fermented CMMS to replace a portion of their feed. Additionally, it looked at how this affected digestive enzyme activity, digestibility, and immune responses. This research aimed to discern how these alterations could influence the laying hens’ productivity. The key goals of the study were to: (1) to reveal the changes in the cecal microbiota, some of its functions, and metabolic products of laying hens under a diet partially replaced with fermented CMMS; (2) to investigate the effects of blind intestine microbial communities, their QS functions, and metabolic products on production performance under the influence of fermented Cordyceps militaris waste mushroom substrate; and (3) to analyze the relationship between microbial communities and their QS functions and metabolic products. The above results will provide a reference for the feed utilization of fermented Cordyceps militaris waste mushroom substrates in laying hens.

Methods

Experimental design and sample collection

For this investigation, we chose 144 Hy-Line Brown hens, all about 18 weeks old and in the laying stage. They were all healthy and started producing eggs. These birds were free to feast and quench their thirst during the trial, all under the same, strict feeding and care routine. The hens came from a single source—Jia Yuan Poultry Breeding Technology Demonstration Park in Lintao County, Gansu Province, China—to keep any potential discrepancies to a minimum. The chicks were shuffled into four different groups, each with six pens holding six birds each. Here’s the lowdown on the diet they were given (refer to Supplementary Table S1): one group received the standard feed (AMC), while the others saw different percentages of their standard feed swapped out for fermented CMMS. Specifically, one group got 10% fermented CMMS (BMC), another got 20% (CMC), and the last group got a heftier 30% (DMC) mixed in with their regular grub. CMMS is sourced from Zhongxing Mushroom Industry Co., Ltd. (Tianshui City, Gansu Province, China). Fermented CMMS was prepared between July and August 2024 (successfully prepared as indicated by the distinct release of a wine-like aroma). CMMS consists of circular mushroom substrate cakes measuring 5 cm in diameter and 2 cm in thickness, with a moisture content of 65–70%. The entire mushroom substrate was cut into 2–5 cm chunks and placed into blue cylindrical polyethylene silage bags. Anaerobic fermentation proceeded for 60 days at room temperature (15–26 °C). Sample collection was completed in mid-May 2025. During production performance testing, the total egg weight and feed intake for each pens were recorded over three consecutive days in the middle of the trial. On the final day of feed intake measurement, one egg was randomly collected from each pens for egg quality testing. For digestibility analysis, feed and feces samples were collected from each pens over three consecutive days following the production performance and egg quality measurements. Immunoglobulins were measured using blood samples collected at slaughter. Enzyme activity, metagenomics, and metabolomics were measured using cecal samples collected post-slaughter. One hen was randomly selected from each pens for euthanasia. After bleeding and euthanizing the experimental chickens, their body surfaces were disinfected with 75% ethanol. Next, the cecal tissue was rapidly excised and securely ligated with sterile cotton thread at its distal end. The resected intestinal material and anaerobic culture packets were then transferred to airtight pouches, properly sealed, and kept chilled at 4 °C in preparation for microbial isolation. Concurrently, the remaining specimens were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, transported under cold chain conditions to the research facility, and archived in a − 80 °C freezer subsequent to genomic analysis.

Nutritional components of fermented CMMS: measurement of laying hen production performance, immune indices, and physiological indices

The nutritional components, both before and after fungal bran fermentation, and apparent digestibility (using the acid insoluble ash, AIA method. Digestibility of the nutrient of interest = 100 − (A1/A2 × N2/N1) × 100% Where: N1: Content of the nutrient of interest in the feed (%); N2: Content of the nutrient of interest in the fecal sample (%); A1: Acid-insoluble ash content in the feed (%); A2: Acid-insoluble ash content in the fecal sample (%).) were determined using methods from the literature (Horvath et al., 2021). Throughout the experimental period, researchers tracked daily egg weight and feed consumption across three consecutive days, then computed the production rate and feed efficiency ratio. In addition, egg samples were gathered for comprehensive quality assessment (Kim et al., 2025). Enzyme activity in the cecum of laying hens was measured using the Lipase ELISA kit (Gansu Aokexin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Gansu, China), Trypsin ELISA kit (Gansu Aokexin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Gansu, China), and Alpha-amylase ELISA kit (Gansu Aokexin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Gansu, China). The IgA ELISA kit (Gansu Aokexin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Gansu, China), IgM ELISA kit (Gansu Aokexin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Gansu, China), and IgG ELISA kit (Gansu Aokexin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Gansu, China) were used to determine the immunoglobulin content in the serum of the laying hens.

DNA extraction, library preparation, and sequencing

For isolating genomic DNA from our collected samples, we utilized one of two MAGEN extraction kits—the MagPure Stool DNA KF Kit B or the Magnetic Bead Fecal and Soil Genome Extraction Kit—both hailing from Guangzhou, China. In each case, we meticulously adhered to the protocols supplied by the manufacturer. Each sample’s 100–200 milligram portion was transferred to a grinding bead-filled centrifuge tube to initiate the process. Next, added 1 mL of buffer ATL/PVP-10 to the tube before putting it through the wringer with a grinder from Shanghai Jingxin Tech back in China. Once that was done, the sample sat tight under specific conditions and then got spun around at 14000 × g for 5 min in an Eppendorf centrifuge fresh from Germany. The clear liquid supernatant was skillfully pipetted into a fresh, sterile centrifuge container. Following the initial step, a generous 0.6 mL of PCI buffer was blended into the supernatant, followed by a quick but vigorous 15-s whirl to ensure thorough mixing. After spinning at 18,213 g for a full 10 min, the clear liquid portion was meticulously transferred to a deep-well plate that had already been treated with a magnetic bead binding solution. This concoction included 600 μL of magnetic bead buffer, a dash of 20 μL Proteinase K, a pinch of 5 μL RNase A, a total of 700 μL for each of the three Wash Buffers (numbers 1, 2, and 3), and a final 100 μL of Elution Buffer. The plate was then placed in its designated spot in the automated DNA extraction system, the Kingfisher from Thermo Fisher, United States, and the extraction protocol was set into motion. Post-run, the extracted DNA was meticulously transferred into a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube and was stored neatly, adhering to the appropriate storage parameters to maintain its integrity.

We built our libraries using either the MGIEasy Universal DNA Library Prep Set or the BGI Optimal DNA Library Prep Kit, both from MGI-Shenzhen and BGI-Shenzhen respectively, following established protocols. To kick things off, we measured out the right amount of genomic DNA and put it through mechanical fragmentation to get DNA pieces of the desired length. After breaking up the DNA, we used magnetic bead technology to cherry-pick fragments that hit the size sweet spot. Next, these carefully selected fragments underwent end-repair treatment to give them blunt ends. We then tacked on a single “A” nucleotide to the 3′ end of these blunt fragments via A-tailing. Following that, we attached specialized adapters to both ends of our modified DNA pieces using a ligation reaction. In the final stretch, we amplified these adapter-bound fragments through PCR and put them through the wringer with quality control checks to make sure our libraries were shipshape.

After getting the final double-stranded library products, they were heated up to break them apart into single-stranded molecules. Then came the circularization step, where the single-stranded DNA was coaxed into forming loops. Before moving forward, any leftover linear DNA fragments were chewed up and removed to ensure only the circular stuff remained. The next phase involved rolling circle amplification with phi29 DNA polymerase, which turned each original single-stranded molecule into DNA nano balls packing about 300 copies apiece. These little balls were then placed onto the nanoarray platform, where the sequencer cranked out paired-end reads 100 or 150 bases long—all thanks to the DNBSEQ-G400/T7/T10 system made by BGI in Shenzhen, China.

Metagenomic data analysis methods

Before diving into the analysis, we first put all raw sequencing data through its paces by trimming low-quality bases using SOAPnuke version 1.5.2. Next, we ran the trimmed sequences through SOAP2 to map them against the host genome, which allowed us to weed out any host-derived reads—though this step was only relevant for samples that originated from the host. After filtering out the low-quality reads, we then turned to MEGAHIT to assemble the remaining high-quality sequences de novo. Once assembly was complete, we tossed out any contigs that were under 200 bp in length to clean up the dataset. Finally, we employed MetaGeneMark to predict genes on the remaining, more substantial contigs for our downstream analyses. CD-HIT eliminated redundant gene sequences at 95% identity and 90% coverage thresholds. The Salmon tool was utilized for gene quantification, and a gene abundance matrix was constructed accordingly. The protein sequences encoded by the predicted genes were aligned against functional databases (KEGG and Swiss-Prot) using DIAMOND software, with an E-value cutoff of 1e−5 to generate functional annotation information. Taxonomic annotations were assigned based on the Kraken LCA algorithm. To pinpoint taxonomic and functional characteristics (including Genera, Phyla, and KOs) that showed statistically significant variations across the studied groups, we utilized the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to analyze their respective abundance profiles. Differentially enriched KEGG pathways were detected according to reporter scores, with an absolute reporter score of 1.65 or higher set as the threshold for statistical significance. To assess ecological variation, we employed the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index, followed by a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) to visualize patterns in community composition. All statistical evaluations were carried out using R, specifically applying the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Kruskal-Wallis H test for comparative analyses. Following normalization of species abundance data, we utilized the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, complemented by linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to identify potential biomarker species across various fermented substrate ratios (p < 0.05, LDA score > 4). For additional insights, nonparametric factor analysis incorporating both Kruskal-Wallis tests and rank-based evaluations was conducted, with the Python LEfse package facilitating the detection of significant variations in species abundance profiles.

Metabolomics measurement

The frozen specimens (cecal chyme) were brought back to room temperature incrementally at 4 °C, with each target sample carefully portioned out at 50–100 mg and placed into centrifuge containers. Each tube then received 0.2 mL of ice-cold ultrapure water before being thoroughly mixed for a full minute. Following this, 0.8 mL of a prechilled extraction liquid—comprising a 1:1 (v/v) blend of methanol and acetonitrile—was introduced to the mix. An additional minute of homogenization preceded a 30-min ultrasonic extraction period conducted under cold conditions. Protein precipitation was achieved by letting the samples sit undisturbed at −20 °C for an hour, after which they were spun in a centrifuge at 12000 rpm and 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatant was subsequently dried completely via vacuum freeze-drying. The remaining pellets were brought back into solution by adding 0.2 mL of a 30% acetonitrile mixture, thoroughly mixed again, and then subjected to centrifugation at 14000 rpm and 4 °C for a quarter of an hour. The upper liquid layer was carefully collected and deemed ready for examination using analytical instrumentation.

The samples were put through both a deep dive into their qualitative and a meticulous quantitative examination via a UPLC-Orbitrap-MS setup. This system was a powerhouse, combining a Vanquish UPLC system with an HFX mass spectrometer. Here’s how we cranked up the details: For the UPLC part of the process, we went with a Waters HSS T3 column—measuring 100 × 2.1 mm with 1.8 μm particles. We kept the column nice and cool at a steady 40 degrees celsius. The mobile phase flowed at a rate of 0.3 mL/min, with a 2 μL sample injected into the system. The solvent mixture consisted of two components: mobile phase A, which was essentially Milli-Q water with a 0.1% formic acid kick, and mobile phase B, acetonitrile also containing 0.1% formic acid. The gradient program followed this exact itinerary: at 0 min, the ratio was 100:0 (A/B, v/v); this composition held steady until the 1-min mark. By 4 min, the mixture had shifted to 40:60 (A/B, v/v). At 6.5 min, it reached 5:95 (A/B, v/v), then immediately jumped back to 100:0 (A/B, v/v) at 6.6 min, maintaining this ratio until the final time point of 8.0 min.

We employed a Q Exactive HFX Hybrid Quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer from Thermo Fisher Scientific to obtain our high-fidelity mass spectrometry data, featuring a heated electrospray ionization (ESI) setup. For data acquisition, we selected the Full-ms-ddMS2 mode. The ESI was operating with the following parameters: sheath gas at 40 arb, auxiliary gas at 10 arb, with spray voltage set to +3,000 V/−2,800 V, source temperature held at 350 °C, and the ion transport tube at 320 °C. For the mass spectrometry scan, we targeted a mass range of 70–1,050 Da (m/z), maintaining a primary resolution of 70,000 and a secondary resolution of 17,500.

We acquired the raw mass spectrometry data utilizing Xcalibur 4.1 software (Thermo Scientific) on the Q-Exactive spectrometer before refining it through Progenesis QI software (Waters Corporation, Milford, United States). The processed data were then seamlessly transferred to Excel format for further examination. Employing the R software suite, we performed multivariate data analysis, incorporating both PCA and OPLS-DA techniques. To assess how each variable contributed to distinguishing between groups, we calculated VIP scores within the OPLS-DA model. We then honed in on metabolites boasting VIP scores exceeding 1, which we subjected to Student’s t-test to evaluate univariate statistical disparities in their abundance levels. Our criterion for statistical significance was established at a p-value threshold below 0.05.

A principal component analysis, commonly referred to as PCA, was conducted utilizing the statistical functions from the ropls package within the R programming environment. Before diving into unsupervised PCA, we scaled the data to ensure unit variance. Additionally, we conducted partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and orthogonal PLS-DA (OPLS-DA), both via the ropls R package, which provided us with score plots and permutation plots as outcomes. For both PLS-DA and OPLS-DA, we applied Pareto scaling as a preprocessing step. To prevent model overfitting, a permutation test was carried out with 200 iterations. We identified key metabolites—those showing significant variations between groups—by applying two strict criteria: a variable importance in projection (VIP) score of 1 or higher and a statistical significance with a p-value of 0.05 or less, with these VIP values being derived directly from the OPLS-DA analysis results. To conduct KEGG annotation and enrichment analysis, we first cross-referenced the identified differential metabolites with the KEGG Compound database1 and then mapped these annotated compounds to the KEGG Pathway database.2 Finally, we utilized the Chemrich online platform3 to perform additional analysis on these metabolites.

Data analysis

To delve into the statistical intricacies of our study, we employed the sophisticated IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 software, hailing from the reputable IBM Corp. in Armonk, NY, United States. A Shapiro–Wilk test was performed on all data prior to analysis, and the results indicated that the data followed a normal distribution. We wielded the independent samples t-test to suss out any discrepancies in the nutritional profiles of bran samples before and after fermentation. For a more comprehensive look at production prowess and egg quality, we turned to the one-way ANOVA (Post-hoc test using LSD and Duncan’s multiple range test), examining factors like digestibility, enzyme activity, and serum immunoglobulin levels in laying hens. The findings were meticulously presented in the format of “mean ± standard deviation”. To delve deeper, we used Spearman’s correlation analysis to uncover connections between the top 20 bacterial genera and the most pivotal differential metabolites, as well as those with QS genes. We set the bar for statistical relevance at a stringent p-value of less than 0.05.

Results

Changes in the nutritional components of fermented CMMS and production performance, egg quality, and physical and chemical indicators of laying hens

The dry matter, neutral detergent fiber, and phosphorus levels in the fermented CM mycelium were notably reduced (p < 0.05). However, there was a significant bump in the crude ash and calcium levels (p < 0.05), as depicted in Figure 1A. When it came to egg-laying, the DMC group blew away the competition, boasting significantly higher production rates, bigger egg sizes, more daily feed consumption, and a better feed-to-egg ratio than the other groups (p < 0.05), as seen in Figure 1B. In terms of egg quality, the DMC group showed a significant increase in yolk color and Haugh unit (p < 0.05) (Figure 1C). In terms of apparent digestibility, the CMC group had significantly higher dry matter, crude protein, and neutral detergent fibers than the other experimental groups (Figure 1D). In terms of cecal enzyme activity, lipase was significantly elevated in the DMC group (p < 0.05). In the BMC group, α-amylase levels soared, reaching statistical significance (p < 0.05) as depicted in Figure 1E. As for the immunoglobulins in the serum, there was a marked increase in IgA and IgM in the CMC group, also reaching statistical significance (p < 0.05). Simultaneously, IgG levels in the BMC group experienced a significant rise (p < 0.05), as illustrated in Figure 1F.

Figure 1.

Composite scientific figure with six labeled panels A to F showing line graphs that compare nutritional, physiological, and biochemical parameters. Panel A compares nutrient percentages pre- and post-fermentation. Panel B shows trends in laying rate, average egg weight, average daily feed intake, and feed efficiency across AMC, BMC, CMC, and DMC groups. Panel C compares egg quality measures including shell strength, thickness, albumen height, yolk color, and Haugh unit among those groups. Panel D presents apparent digestibility percentages for dry matter, crude protein, ash, and neutral detergent fiber. Panel E compares enzyme activities for lipase, trypsin, and alpha-amylase. Panel F presents serum immune globulin values for IgA, IgG, and IgM across the same groups. Distinct lines, colors, and letter markings denote statistical significance in each graph.

Changes in the nutritional composition of the fermentation substrate for Cordyceps militaris mushrooms and analysis of laying hen production performance, egg quality, apparent digestibility, enzyme activity, and immune levels. (A) Nutritional indicators. (B) Production performance. (C) Egg quality. (D) Apparent digestibility. (E) Enzyme activity. (F) Immunoglobulin. Different lowercase letters in the line graph indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).

Changes in the bacterial community structure of the cecum of laying hens fed different proportions of CMMS

In this current investigation, we compiled a grand total of 158 gigabytes of Illumina sequencing data from the 24 samples we gathered. After running a rigorous quality control process, we were left with a robust one billion reads, boasting an impressive average length of 1482.62 base pairs (refer to Supplementary Tables S2, S3 for more details). Our principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) yielded some fascinating insights, pinpointing considerable differences in the cecal microbiome of hens fed varying concentrations of fermented CMMS. Check out Figure 2C for the full story. In terms of microbial species composition, 20 high-ranking bacterial phyla and genera were selected for analysis based on abundance. At the phylum level, Bacteroidota and Bacillota were the dominant phyla, with relative abundances greater than 1%. The relative abundance of Bacteroidota was 53.13% for AMC, 48.41% for BMC, 49.51% for CMC, and 56.78% for DMC. The relative abundance of Bacillota was 41.92% in AMC, 45.83% in BMC, 44.11% in CMC, and 37.05% in DMC.

Figure 2.

Panel A shows a stacked bar chart of relative bacterial abundance by phylum for AMC, BMC, CMC, and DMC groups. Panel B presents a similar bar chart by genus for the same groups. Panel C is a PCoA plot displaying clustering of samples by group. Panel D features a cladogram with colored branches indicating taxonomic groups enriched in each experimental group. Panel E contains a horizontal bar graph of LDA scores for specific taxa, stratified by group color.

Microbial structure of the cecum under different proportions of fermented Cordyceps militaris mushroom substrate replacement diets. (A,B) Microbial compositions at the phylum level. (C) PCoA analysis. (D,E) LEfSe analyses.

Moreover, at the phylum level, Thermodesulfobacteriota thrived more notably in the DMC and CMC batches, standing out against the other test groups (p < 0.05). The unclassified Bacteria phylum also showed a marked upsurge in the BMC batch, outpacing the rest of the groups (p < 0.05), while Spirochaetota boasts a notably higher presence in the DMC and CMC groups versus the others (p < 0.05). Furthermore, Mycoplasmatota was more prevalent in the BMC group than in the others (p < 0.05), and Verrucomicrobiota was especially abundant in the CMC group compared to the rest (p < 0.05; see Figure 2A). When zooming in on the genus level, the big players were Bacteroides, Phocaeicola, Alistipes, Faecalibacterium, Mediterraneiibacter, Clostridium, Prevotella, Parabacteroides, and Phascolarctobacterium, all boasting a relative abundance of over 1%.

In terms of the genus, Bacteroides was far more common in the BMC and DMC groups, showing a substantial uptick when compared to the rest of the test groups (the figure is below 0.05 significance). The relative frequencies of Phocaeicola and Alistipes were notably greater in the DMC group as opposed to the rest of the groups tested (each with a figure well below 0.05). A similar pattern was observed for Faecalibacterium and Pseudoflavonifractor, with their relative frequency on the up in the AMC group, distinctly outpacing the other test groups (both had figures well below 0.05). Clostridium and Prevotella also scored higher in the AMC and BMC groups relative to the other groups, with p-values under 0.05 for both. Parabacteroides was particularly prevalent in the DMC and CMC groups versus the rest of the experiment, while Phascolarctobacterium seemed to prefer the BMC group over the others, also with a p-value below 0.05 (refer to Figure 2B for details).

LEfSe analysis revealed biomarkers in the cecum of laying hens fed diets supplemented with fermented CMMS at different ratios (Figures 2D,E). Additionally, the 20 high-ranking pathways by relative abundance in KEGG (level 2 pathways) were selected for analysis (Figure 3A). Stamp analysis revealed increases in glycan biosynthesis and metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid metabolism, and replication and repair in the AMC group. Increases in amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and replication and repair were also detected in the BMC group. Finally, increases in energy metabolism and amino acid metabolism were also observed in the DMC group (Figures 3B–D).

Figure 3.

Panel A displays a stacked bar plot showing the relative abundance of various metabolic pathways across four groups (AMC, BMC, CMC, DMC) with colors representing different pathways as indicated in the legend. Panels B, C, and D present horizontal bar charts comparing mean proportions of selected pathways between AMC vs BMC, AMC vs CMC, and AMC vs DMC, respectively, accompanied by 95 percent confidence intervals and corrected p-values to indicate statistical significance.

KEGG level 2 pathway analysis. (A) The 20 high-ranking KEGG level 2 pathways were ranked by relative abundance. (B–D) Stamp difference analysis.

Changes in QS genes of microbial communities in the cecum of laying hens fed different proportions of CMMS

Nine QS genes were annotated in the cecal microbiota of laying hens. The relative abundance ranking of QS genes is as follows: LuxS family, pseudouridine synthase RluA family, autoinducer-regulated transcriptional regulatory protein family, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase family, autoinducer synthase family, PemK/MazF family, AgrB family, autoinducer-2 exporter (AI-2E) (TC 2.A.86) family, and peptidase S45 family (Figure 4A). Stamp analysis revealed an increase in the pseudouridine synthase RluA family, LuxS family, and autoinducer-regulated transcriptional regulatory protein family in the AMC group. In the BMC group, there was an increase in the pseudouridine synthase RluA family and the LuxS family. Additionally, in the DMC group, the pseudouridine synthase RluA family showed an increase (Figures 4B–D).

Figure 4.

Panel A presents a stacked bar chart comparing relative abundances of protein families in four groups (AMC, BMC, CMC, DMC), with LuxS family dominating. Panels B, C, and D display comparative bar graphs and 95% confidence interval plots showing mean proportions, differences, and corrected p-values for selected families (LuxS, pseudouridine synthase RluA, and others) between group pairs, using red and blue to denote groups.

Analysis of QS function. (A) Relative abundance of QS genes. (B–D) Stamp difference analysis.

Changes in differential metabolites in laying hens fed different proportions of CMMS

A nontargeted metabolomic analysis was conducted on the cecal chyme of laying hens in this study. A total of 1,529 differential metabolites were identified, ranked as follows: carboxylic acids and derivatives (21.20%), organooxygen compounds (10.10%), fatty acyls (9.00%), prenol lipids (8.80%), steroids and steroid derivatives (6.00%), benzene and substituted derivatives (5.10%), flavonoids (2.70%), indoles and derivatives (2.40%), glycerophospholipids (1.90%), phenols (1.80%), and others (31.00%) (Figure 5A). Volcano plot analysis of differentially expressed metabolites between samples revealed that BMC_VS_AMC had 171 upregulated and 125 downregulated differentially expressed metabolites (Figure 5B). For the CMC_VS_AMC comparison group, a total of 308 differentially expressed metabolites were found to be upregulated, while 287 differentially expressed metabolites were downregulated (Figure 5C). In the DMC_VS_AMC group, 304 differentially expressed metabolites exhibited upregulation, and 334 differentially expressed metabolites showed downregulation (Figure 5D). Furthermore, KEGG functional enrichment analysis was performed on these differentially expressed metabolites. The results indicated that the differentially expressed metabolites in the BMC_VS_AMC group were most significantly enriched in the taurine and hypotaurine metabolism pathway (Figure 5E). For the CMC_VS_AMC group, the differentially expressed metabolites were predominantly enriched in glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor biosynthesis (Figure 5F), whereas the differentially expressed metabolites in the DMC_VS_AMC group were most highly enriched in the autophagy−other pathway (Figure 5G).

Figure 5.

Panel A displays a pie chart showing categories of chemical compounds with color-coded segments and corresponding percentages, such as phenols, flavonoids, carbohydrates, and others. Panels B, C, and D present volcano plots illustrating differential expression analysis between various groups; red, green, and gray dots indicate upregulated, downregulated, and non-significant points, respectively, with x-axes labeled as log two fold change and y-axes as negative log ten p-value. Panels E, F, and G show dot plots of KEGG pathway enrichment; dot size and color represent enrichment and significance, with pathways listed on the y-axis and enrichment scores or p-values plotted on the x-axis.

Metabolomics analysis. (A) Composition of differentially expressed metabolites. (B–D) Volcano plot analysis of differentially expressed metabolites. B: BMC_VS_AMC. C. CMC_VS_AMC. D. DMC_VS_AMC. (E–G) KEGG enrichment analysis of differentially expressed metabolites. (E) BMC_VS_AMC. (F) CMC_VS_AMC. (G) DMC_VS_AMC.

Interactions between microorganisms and differential metabolites and QS genes

Spearman correlation analysis was performed in this study between the 20 high-ranking bacterial genera, ranked by relative abundance, and the 20 high-ranking differentially expressed metabolites (also ranked by relative abundance) and QS genes. Correlation analysis of the top 20 differential metabolites (ranked by relative abundance) demonstrated the following relationships: Alistipes was significantly negatively correlated with dodecanedioic acid and tetradecanedioic acid (r < 0, p < 0.001); Analysis of microbial relationships revealed that Bacteroides had a striking inverse relationship with both tetradecanedioic acid and rhizocticin A (r < 0, p < 0.001), while Clostridium showed the opposite pattern, demonstrating a strong positive correlation with tetradecanedioic acid (r > 0, p < 0.001). Mediterraneibacter also jumped on the positive correlation bandwagon with rhizocticin A (r > 0, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, Parabacteroides was found to be in opposite territory, showing significant negative correlations with both tetradecanedioic acid and sebacic acid (r < 0, p < 0.001), whereas Pseudoflavonifractor was clearly on the same page with rhizocticin A and 1-amino-3-(N-phenylanilino) urea (r > 0, p < 0.001) (Figure 6). Diving deeper into quorum-sensing (QS) genes, we found that Alistipes was tight with the PemK/MazF family (r > 0, p < 0.001) but kept its distance from the autoinducer-2 exporter (AI-2E) family (TC 2.A.86) (r < 0, p < 0.001). Bacteroides was singing from the same hymn sheet, positively correlating with PemK/MazF (r > 0, p < 0.001) and negatively with AI-2E (r < 0, p < 0.001). On the other hand, Clostridium was playing by different rules, showing negative correlations with both the PemK/MazF family and autoinducer synthase family (r < 0, p < 0.001), while embracing the autoinducer-2 exporter (AI-2E) family and autoinducer-regulated transcriptional regulatory protein family with positive correlations (r > 0, p < 0.001). Faecalibacterium was out of step with the peptidase S45 family (r < 0, p < 0.001) but in harmony with the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase family (r > 0, p < 0.001). Parabacteroides kept its distance from the autoinducer-2 exporter (AI-2E) family (r < 0, p < 0.001) but found common ground with the autoinducer synthase family (r > 0, p < 0.001). Phocaeicola was out of sync with the pseudouridine synthase RluA family, peptidase S45 family, autoinducer-regulated transcriptional regulatory protein family, and AgrB family (r < 0, p < 0.001), but in lockstep with the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase family (r > 0, p < 0.001). Pseudoflavonifractor, for its part, was not seeing eye to eye with the pseudouridine synthase RluA family and the PemK/MazF family (r < 0, p < 0.001) (Figure 7).

Figure 6.

Correlation heatmap visualizing relationships between bacterial genera listed along the x-axis and chemical compounds on the y-axis, with colors representing correlation values from negative (purple, -0.6) to positive (red, 0.6) and asterisks indicating statistical significance.

Correlation analysis between the microbial community and metabolites in the cecum. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

Figure 7.

Heatmap illustrating correlation values between multiple bacterial genus groups, labeled along the x-axis, and various gene or protein families, labeled on the y-axis. Colors range from purple for strong negative correlations to red for strong positive correlations, as indicated by the color bar on the right. Some cells contain asterisks, denoting statistical significance.

Correlation analysis between the microbial community of the cecum and quorum-sensing genes. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

Discussion

Mounting evidence has shed light on how crucial gut microbiota is for maintaining overall host health. Changes in the intestinal microbial composition can significantly influence both physical condition and disease progression, according to numerous investigations (Li et al., 2023; Cao et al., 2023). Consequently, Therefore, the addition of feed additives to the diet and other health interventions have become common strategies for modulating the gut microbiota and ensuring optimal growth and health in animals (Maki et al., 2019; Zhou and Shen, 2026). With the rapid development of animal husbandry, competition between humans and livestock for grain has become a significant challenge to the advancement of animal husbandry (Schader et al., 2015). CMMS, as an unconventional feed, has a certain role in alleviating the conflict between humans and livestock over grain. Consequently, this investigation focused on commercial laying hens as the experimental subjects, thoroughly examining their capacity for feed efficiency using a range of approaches including production performance metrics, metagenomic analysis, and metabolomic profiling. The research sought to establish a solid theoretical framework that would inform the future application of CMMS in improving feed utilization within the laying hen population.

The findings of this research reveal that subjecting CMMS to fermentation caused a substantial transformation in its nutritional makeup, which in turn boosted the productivity, egg quality, and digestibility of laying hens. Additionally, it promoted digestive enzyme activity and increased serum immunoglobulin content. Studies have shown that a CM waste culture medium may offer potential benefits in improving egg quality and producing eggs with low cholesterol levels when used as a feed additive (Wang et al., 2015). Fermented enoki mushroom bran can enhance egg quality and inhibit the proliferation of gastrointestinal pathogens (Lee et al., 2014). Additionally, feeding oyster mushrooms to laying hens improves apparent digestibility and egg quality (Mahfuz et al., 2018). Our findings are consistent with the above reports. It has been demonstrated that fermented edible fungi or their culture medium have certain application potential as unconventional feed in laying hens. The specific feeding effects vary depending on the fermentation method, the source of the culture medium, and the type of edible fungi.

This research delved into the alterations in the gut microbiome of laying hens following the supplementation of fermented CMMS, utilizing metagenomic analysis to uncover the community structure and identifying various functionalities associated with it. The results showed that the dominant bacterial groups at the phylum level were Bacteroidota and Bacillota, with relative abundances of 53.13 and 41.92% in the AMC group, 48.41 and 45.83% in the BMC group, CMC (49.51, 44.11%), and DMC (56.78, 37.05%), respectively. These results align with earlier investigations into the gut microbial composition of poultry (Pandit et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2016). The Bacteroidota phylum plays a pivotal role in avian digestive processes and metabolic functions, such as breaking down complex carbohydrates (particularly cellulose and hemicellulose), generating short-chain fatty acids, and influencing overall host well-being and immune responses (Li W. et al., 2025; Limede et al., 2025; Akram et al., 2025; Jiang et al., 2025). Bacillota are crucial in animal nutrition, metabolism, energy supply, intestinal development, and immune regulation (Gardiner et al., 2020; Tardiolo et al., 2025; Indiani et al., 2018; Ouwehand et al., 2002). It has been demonstrated that fermented CMMS aids in promoting digestion, metabolism, and immune regulation in laying hens. In addition, our results on apparent digestibility and serum immunoglobulin also indicate that fermented CMMS promotes digestion and regulates immunity in laying hens.

At the genus level, Bacteroides, Phocaeicola, Alistipes, Faecalibacterium, Mediterranibacter, Clostridium, Prevotella, Parabacteroides, and Phascolarctobacterium are the dominant bacterial communities. Bacteroides in animals facilitate nutrient processing and uptake (Smith et al., 2006), maintaining intestinal homeostasis (Zafar and Saier, 2021), and influencing host health and immunity (Wexler, 2007). The findings reveal that Bacteroides levels were markedly higher in both the BMC and DMC treatment groups. A specific portion of the fermented CMMS appears to enhance nutrient digestion and absorption processes, as well as immune function in laying hens. Additionally, Phocaeicola plays a crucial role in preserving gut health and contributing to metabolic activities (Zhou et al., 2024). The findings revealed that Phocaeicola levels were markedly higher among the DMC subjects, hinting that fermented CMMS might give a leg up to gut balance and nutrient processing in laying hens. Alistipes has a variety of functions when it comes to animal physiology, wearing several hats across metabolic functions, immune responses, and therapeutic applications (Li et al., 2025a; Parker et al., 2020; Prosberg et al., 2016). The data revealed that Alistipes levels were considerably more prominent in the DMC cohort, pointing to the possibility that fermented CMMS could enhance the wellbeing of laying hens. When it comes to Clostridium, the story is complicated given its dual nature as both a friend and foe in animal health (Uzal et al., 2022). Notably, the AMC and BMC groups showed significantly greater Clostridium abundance compared to the rest of the experimental groups, which hints that fermented CMMS might bolster the disease resistance capabilities of these hens.

The KEGG functional annotation for the BMC group revealed a boost in amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism, as well as in replication and repair pathways. On the flip side, the DMC group experienced a surge in energy and amino acid metabolism. The functions of these components are consistent with the functional structure of the microbial community. This result suggests that fermented CMMS has potential as an unconventional feed application in egg chicken production. Additionally, it may have beneficial effects on nutrient digestion and absorption, as well as on maintaining intestinal homeostasis and enhancing disease resistance.

QS is a communication mechanism through which bacteria coordinate their behavior by secreting and sensing specific signaling molecules. When the number of bacteria reaches a certain density, the concentration of signaling molecules reaches a threshold, thereby activating a series of gene expressions that lead to synchronous changes in group behavior (Anburajan et al., 2023). The LuxS family genes encode an enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of AI-2 (Autoinducer-2). AI-2 is considered a QS signal molecule common to both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (Schauder et al., 2001). The quorum sensing system driven by AI-2 has been implicated in a range of bacterial physiological functions, such as biofilm development, the synthesis of virulence factors, antibiotic generation, and metabolic activities (Zhao et al., 2018). Interestingly, although no antibiotics were added to the diet of chickens, antibiotic resistance genes were annotated through metagenomic functional annotation (Shen et al., 2024). This may implied that bacteria can influence the production of antibiotics through QS pathways, which is an idea worth paying attention to and continuing to research. The research findings revealed a notable uptick in the LuxS family within the BMC cohort. This discovery suggests that fermented CMMS might play a significant part in modulating AI-2-induced bacterial quorum sensing. However, to pinpoint the exact mechanism at play, we require more comprehensive research. Pseudouridine synthase, the RluA family of pseudouridine synthases, is not a direct QS key protein (such as signal molecule receptors), but the QS system can regulate its gene expression. Therefore, if QS regulates enzymes of the RluA family, such regulation may indirectly influence the overall physiological state and metabolic activities of bacteria, and may even affect phenotypes related to collective behavior (Miyamoto and Meighen, 2006; Xu et al., 2025; Kalburge et al., 2017). Our findings indicate that the pseudouridine synthase RluA family is increased in the BMC and DMC groups, suggesting that fermented CMMS may have a potential impact on bacterial physiological status, metabolic activity, and phenotypes related to group behavior.

The gut microbiome influences host physiology via metabolite generation (Ren et al., 2018). Fatty acids are one of the most common carboxylic acids and are the primary form of energy storage in cells. Fatty acids are also components of phospholipids, sphingolipids, and triglycerides in cell membranes. Additionally, many intermediates in the tricarboxylic acid cycle are carboxylic acids (Hall and Zheng, 2011; Offermanns, 2014). This research reveals that among the varied metabolites with altered expression, carboxylic acids and their variants account for a robust 21.20%, making them the most prevalent. This result may suggest that fermenting CMMS at different proportions in the diet primarily affects energy metabolism and biofilm formation in laying hens. Organooxygen compounds are mainly involved in signal transduction, energy metabolism, and production, as well as antioxidant capacity, in living organisms (Hancock, 2021; Li et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2022). Our research results indicate that organooxygen compounds (10.10%) rank second among all differential metabolites. This suggests that the addition of fermented CMMS at varying proportions in the diet primarily affects signal transduction, energy metabolism, and antioxidant capacity in laying hens. Furthermore, the KEGG pathway enrichment analysis indicated that the metabolites that were found to be differentially expressed were predominantly clustered in three key pathways: the metabolism of taurine and hypotaurine, the biosynthesis of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchors, and autophagy-related processes. Taurine and hypotaurine, in particular, play a crucial role in the antioxidant game (Aruoma et al., 1988), bile acid binding (Russell, 2009), and osmotic regulation (Trachtman et al., 1988) pathways in animals. The biosynthesis of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor is essential for preserving cell membrane integrity, promoting intercellular communication, and governing the intricacies of cellular development (Desnoyer and Palanivelu, 2020). Autophagy–other roles in maintaining cellular homeostasis (Zhou et al., 2022) and immune regulation (Keller et al., 2023) in living organisms. This suggests that replacing different proportions of the diet with CMMS primarily affects antioxidant capacity, bile acid binding, maintenance of cellular homeostasis, and immune regulation in laying hens.

Additionally, there was a certain connection between microorganisms, their metabolites, and QS genes. This research suggests a notable inverse relationship between Parabacteroides and tetradecanedioic acid, as well as sebacic acid, with a correlation coefficient below zero and a statistically significant p-value less than 0.001. Conversely, Pseudoflavonifractor exhibited a significant direct correlation with rhizocticin A and 1-amino-3-(N-phenylalanino) urea, showing a correlation coefficient greater than zero and a p-value below 0.001. Parabacteroides promotes animal growth, improves digestive fermentation, and regulates immunity in animals (Feng et al., 2025; Zhang et al., 2025). Tetradecanedioic acid belongs to the class of dicarboxylic acids, which participate in host energy metabolism (Grego and Mingrone, 1995) and mediate host–microbial interactions, thereby affecting metabolic regulation (Lee et al., 2018). Sebacic acid participates in energy metabolism and regulates lipid metabolism (Liao et al., 2024). Pseudoflavonifractor is considered a beneficial bacterium (Kim et al., 2023), whose main end products are acetic acid and succinic acid (Sun et al., 2024), and which has immunomodulatory and metabolic regulatory effects (Tang et al., 2025). Rhizocticin A has antifungal properties (Jastrzębowska and Gabriel, 2015). This may suggest that the relative abundances of Parabacteroides, Pseudoflavonifractor, and other bacteria play a regulatory role in energy metabolism, lipid metabolism, and immune function, thereby exerting a positive influence on production performance. Of course, this is merely a correlation based on the data. Further validation and refinement are needed to determine the specific mechanisms involved. The study reveals a strong positive association between Alistipes and the PemK/MazF gene family (r > 0, p < 0.001). At the same time, Faecalibacterium is significantly negatively correlated with the peptidase S45 family (r < 0, p < 0.001). Alistipes regulate metabolism and affect intestinal immune function (Casto-Rebollo et al., 2023). The primary function of the PemK/MazF family is to regulate cell growth and metabolism, thereby enhancing bacterial survival rates. It is also linked to biofilm formation and the production of persistent cells (Qiu et al., 2022). Faecalibacterium can regulate intestinal homeostasis, improve intestinal barrier function, and reduce inflammation (Ferreira-Halder et al., 2017). The peptidase S45 family is involved in biological processes that require multistep enzymatic reactions or the coordination of multiple enzymes (Rawlings, 2013). This may suggest that there is a certain association between the relative abundances of Alistipes, Faecalibacterium, and other bacteria and certain quorum sensing genes, and that this association helps regulate intestinal homeostasis and improve intestinal barrier function, thereby positively impacting the production and health of laying hens. This interpretation is based on correlations observed in the data; further validation and refinement are needed to determine the specific mechanisms involved.

Conclusion

In summary, this study determined the macroscopic and microscopic performance of laying hens following the replacement of their diet with fermented Cordyceps militaris mushroom substrate at different concentrations. The study characterized the production performance, apparent digestibility, microbial communities and their metabolites, and quorum sensing genes in laying hens under this substitution regimen. These changes enhanced energy metabolism and modulated the immune system in laying hens, providing insights into the hen’s microbiome and offering a reference for the feed utilization of fermented Cordyceps militaris mushroom substrate in laying hens.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Zhongxing Mushroom Industry Co., Ltd. in Tianshui City, Gansu Province, for providing the experimental materials, and Jiyuan Livestock and Poultry Breeding Science and Technology Demonstration Park in Lintao County, Gansu Province, for providing the experimental base.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Gansu Province Talent Program Project (2024QNTD27) and Application and Promotion of Digitalized Antibiotic-Without Gan-Tasting Livestock Product Production Technology (2023-3-110).

Edited by: Franck Carbonero, Washington State University Health Sciences Spokane, United States

Reviewed by: Pravin Mishra, University of Hawaii at Manoa, United States

Xinhong Zhou, Southwest University of Science and Technology, China

Data availability statement

The data sets presented in this study can be found in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession numbers PRJNA1301039. The metabolomics data have been deposited to MetaboLights repository with the study identifier MTBLS12825.

Ethics statement

All studies involving animals were carried out in accordance with the regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals (Ministry of Science and Technology, China, revised in June 2004), and sample collection protocols were approved by the Livestock Care Committee of Gansu Agricultural University (Approval No. GAU-C-025-7). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.

Author contributions

HZ: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft. LM: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. LJ: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis. YL: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. YW: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. WWa: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. WWu: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. HW: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. HL: Writing – review & editing, Resources. YZ: Writing – review & editing, Validation. GC: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. KH: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. JD: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1807060/full#supplementary-material

Table_1.xlsx (12.3KB, xlsx)
Table_2.xlsx (11.3KB, xlsx)
Table_3.xlsx (10.6KB, xlsx)

References

  1. Akram A., Shahin F., Asif I., Bilal A., Abbas K. J., Younas E. (2025). Exploring the role of gut BACTERIA in digestive system of cow. J. Med. Health Sci. Rev. 2, 3007–3081. doi: 10.62019/vqy19m89, 41968102 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anburajan P., Cayetano R. D., Prohim Y. M., Thau N. T., Kim S., Kim H., et al. (2023). Role of quorum sensing and quorum quenching in anaerobic digestion: a scoping review. Environ. Res. 239:117413. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117413, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aruoma O., Halliwell B., Hoey B. M., Butler J. (1988). The antioxidant action of taurine, hypotaurine and their metabolic precursors. Biochem. J. 256, 251–255. doi: 10.1042/bj2560251, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aruwa C. E., Pillay C., Nyaga M. M., Sabiu S. (2021). Poultry gut health–microbiome functions, environmental impacts, microbiome engineering and advancements in characterization technologies. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 12:119. doi: 10.1186/s40104-021-00640-9, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baxter M., Richmond A., Lavery U., O’Connell N. E. (2021). A comparison of fast growing broiler chickens with a slower-growing breed type reared on higher welfare commercial farms. PLoS One 16:e0259333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259333, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bindari Y. R., Gerber P. F. (2022). Centennial review: factors affecting the chicken gastrointestinal microbial composition and their association with gut health and productive performance. Poult. Sci. 101:101612. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101612, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cao Y., Feng T., Wu Y., Xu Y., Du L., Wang T., et al. (2023). The multi-kingdom microbiome of the goat gastrointestinal tract. Microbiome 11:219. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01651-6, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Casto-Rebollo C., Argente M. J., García M. L., Pena R. N., Blasco A., Ibáñez-Escriche N. (2023). Selection for environmental variance shifted the gut microbiome composition driving animal resilience. Microbiome 11:147. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01580-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen Y., Ni J., Li H. (2019). Effect of green tea and mulberry leaf powders on the gut microbiota of chicken. BMC Vet. Res. 15:77. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1822-z, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheng H., Liu X., Xiao Q., Zhang F., Liu N., Tang L., et al. (2022). Rapeseed meal and its application in pig diet: a review. Agriculture 12:849. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12060849 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dai X., Hinsu A., Dadousis C., Pandit R., Crotta M., Limon G., et al. Genome-wide association studies of chicken caecal microbiota. Proceedings of 12th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers (2022). [Google Scholar]
  12. Das S. K., Masuda M., Sakurai A., Sakakibara M. (2010). Medicinal uses of the mushroom cordyceps militaris: current state and prospects. Fitoterapia 81, 961–968. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2010.07.010, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Desnoyer N., Palanivelu R. (2020). Bridging the GAPs in plant reproduction: a comparison of plant and animal GPI-anchored proteins. Plant Reprod. 33, 129–142. doi: 10.1007/s00497-020-00395-9, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Federle M. J., Bassler B. L. (2003). Interspecies communication in bacteria. J. Clin. Invest. 112, 1291–1299. doi: 10.1172/JCI20195, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Feng X., Liu Y., Xu S., Ma J., Yuan H., Wang H., et al. (2025). Functional analysis of Parabacteroides distasonis F4: a novel probiotic strain linked to calf growth and rumen fermentation. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 16:50. doi: 10.1186/s40104-025-01182-0, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Feng Y., Wang Y., Zhu B., Gao G. F., Guo Y., Hu Y. (2021). Metagenome-assembled genomes and gene catalog from the chicken gut microbiome aid in deciphering antibiotic resistomes. Commun. Biol. 4:1305. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02827-2, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ferreira-Halder C. V., de Sousa Faria A. V., Andrade S. S. (2017). Action and function of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in health and disease. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 31, 643–648. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2017.09.011, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Foley S. L., Grant K. (2007). Molecular techniques of detection and discrimination of foodborne pathogens and their toxins. in Foodborne diseases. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 485–510. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-501-5_20, 34872745 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gardiner G. E., Metzler-Zebeli B. U., Lawlor P. G. (2020). Impact of intestinal microbiota on growth and feed efficiency in pigs: a review. Microorganisms 8:1886. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8121886, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gilroy R., Ravi A., Getino M., Pursley I., Horton D. L., Alikhan N.-F., et al. (2021). Extensive microbial diversity within the chicken gut microbiome revealed by metagenomics and culture. PeerJ 9:e10941. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10941, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Grego A., Mingrone G. (1995). Dicarboxylic acids, an alternate fuel substrate in parenteral nutrition: an update. Clin. Nutr. 14, 143–148. doi: 10.1016/s0261-5614(95)80011-5, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Guo P., Kai Q., Gao J., Lian Z.-q., Wu C.-m., Wu C.-a., et al. (2010). Cordycepin prevents hyperlipidemia in hamsters fed a high-fat diet via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 113, 395–403. doi: 10.1254/jphs.10041fp, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hall D. G., Zheng H. (2011). Activation of carboxylic acids. Boron Compounds. 8, 7–15. doi: 10.1055/sos-sd-106-00016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hancock J. T. (2021). Oxygen is instrumental for biological signaling: an overview. Oxygen 1, 3–15. doi: 10.3390/oxygen1010002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Horvath K., Brocious A., Miller-Cushon E. (2021). Effects of forage presentation and addition of molasses-based liquid feed on dairy calf dietary selection and feed sorting of mixed diets. J. Dairy Sci. 104, 9052–9062. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20422, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Indiani C. M. S. P., Rizzardi K. F., Castelo P. M., Ferraz L. F. C., Darrieux M., Parisotto T. M. (2018). Childhood obesity and firmicutes/bacteroidetes ratio in the gut microbiota: a systematic review. Child. Obes. 14, 501–509. doi: 10.1089/chi.2018.0040, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jastrzębowska K., Gabriel I. (2015). Inhibitors of amino acids biosynthesis as antifungal agents. Amino Acids 47, 227–249. doi: 10.1007/s00726-014-1873-1, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jiang K., Ma J., Xu J., Zhang Y., Niu H. (2025). Multi-omics revealed the effects of different feeding systems on rumen microorganisms, cellulose degradation, and metabolites in Mongolian cattle. Animals 15:1774. doi: 10.3390/ani15121774, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Joo S. S., Yoon J. H., Jung J. Y., Joo S. Y., An S. H., Ban B. C., et al. (2022). The modulatory effects of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei strain NSMJ56 on gut immunity and microbiome in early-age broiler chickens. Animals 12:3413. doi: 10.3390/ani12233413, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kalburge S. S., Carpenter M. R., Rozovsky S., Boyd E. F. (2017). Quorum sensing regulators are required for metabolic fitness in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Infect. Immun. 85, 0019–9567. doi: 10.1128/iai.00930-16, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Keller C. W., Adamopoulos I. E., Lünemann J. D. (2023). Autophagy pathways in autoimmune diseases. J. Autoimmun. 136:103030. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2023.103030, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kim S.-H., Choi Y., Miguel M. A., Lee S.-J., Lee S.-S., Lee S.-S. (2023). Analysis of fecal microbial changes in young calves following bovine rotavirus infection. Vet. Sci. 10:496. doi: 10.3390/vetsci10080496, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim C.-H., Lee W.-D., Lim S.-J., Yang K.-Y., Jeon J.-H. (2025). Effects of cool water supply on laying performance, egg quality, rectal temperature and stress hormones in heat-stressed laying hens in open-type laying houses. Animals 15:1635. doi: 10.3390/ani15111635, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lee S.-H., Bang S., Jang H.-H., Lee E.-B., Kim B.-S., Kim S.-H., et al. (2020). Effects of Allium hookeri on gut microbiome related to growth performance in young broiler chickens. PLoS One 15:e0226833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226833, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee H., Han C., Lee H.-W., Park G., Jeon W., Ahn J., et al. (2018). Development of a promising microbial platform for the production of dicarboxylic acids from biorenewable resources. Biotechnol. Biofuels 11:310. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1310-x, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lee S. B., Im J., Kim S. K., Kim Y. C., Kim M. J., Lee J. S., et al. (2014). Effects of dietary fermented Flammulina velutipes mycelium on performance and egg quality in laying hens. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 13, 637–644. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2014.637.644 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Li L. (2023). Commodity prices volatility and economic growth: empirical evidence from natural resources industries of China. Resour. Policy 80:103152. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103152, 38826717 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Li S., Cao X., Zou T., Wang Z., Chen X., Chen J., et al. (2024). Integrated transcriptomics and untargeted metabolomics reveal bone development and metabolism of newly weaned mice in response to dietary calcium and boron levels. Food Funct. 15, 10853–10869. doi: 10.1039/d4fo03657c, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Li Y., Feng Z., Liang C., Lu S., Wang G., Meng G. (2025a). The double-edged sword: impact of antibiotic use on immunotherapy efficacy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol. 25:221. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03819-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Li C., Li X., Guo R., Ni W., Liu K., Liu Z., et al. (2023). Expanded catalogue of metagenome-assembled genomes reveals resistome characteristics and athletic performance-associated microbes in horse. Microbiome 11:7. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01448-z, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Li Y., Wang Y., Meng Z. (2025b). Dietary wet fermented brewer’s grains modulate hepatic metabolism in pullets. Sci. Rep. 15:17109. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01743-3, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Li W., Zeng X., Wang L., Yin L., Wang Q., Yang H. (2025). Comparative analysis of gut microbiota diversity across different digestive tract sites in Ningxiang pigs. Animals 15:936. doi: 10.3390/ani15070936, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Liao Z., Alrosan M., Alu'datt M. H., Tan T. C. (2024). 10-hydroxy decanoic acid, trans-10-hydroxy-2-decanoic acid, and sebacic acid: source, metabolism, and potential health functionalities and nutraceutical applications. J. Food Sci. 89, 3878–3893. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.17143, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Limede A. C., Marques R. S., Cidrini F. A., Cruz V. A., Queiroz A. C., Cidrini I. A., et al. (2025). Effects of a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial on digestibility, ruminal in situ nutrient disappearance, microbiome, and fermentation parameters in forage-fed beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 103:skaf093. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaf093, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Liu J.-y., Feng C.-p., Li X., Chang M.-c., Meng J.-l., Xu L.-j. (2016). Immunomodulatory and antioxidative activity of cordyceps militaris polysaccharides in mice. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 86, 594–598. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.02.009, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lowery C. A., Dickerson T. J., Janda K. D. (2008). Interspecies and interkingdom communication mediated by bacterial quorum sensing. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 1337–1346. doi: 10.1039/b702781h, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ma L., Xia Y., Li B., Yang Y., Li L.-G., Tiedje J. M., et al. (2016). Metagenomic assembly reveals hosts of antibiotic resistance genes and the shared resistome in pig, chicken, and human feces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 420–427. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Mahfuz S., Song H., Wei J., Chen M., Zhen D., Nahar J., et al. (2018). Organic egg production, egg quality, calcium utilization, and digestibility in laying hens fed with mushroom (Flammulina velutipes) stem waste. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 20, 717–724. doi: 10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0756 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Maki J. J., Klima C. L., Sylte M. J., Looft T. (2019). The microbial pecking order: utilization of intestinal microbiota for poultry health. Microorganisms 7:376. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7100376, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. McKenna A., Ijaz U. Z., Kelly C., Linton M., Sloan W. T., Green B. D., et al. (2020). Impact of industrial production system parameters on chicken microbiomes: mechanisms to improve performance and reduce Campylobacter. Microbiome 8:128. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00908-8, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Miyamoto C. M., Meighen E. A. (2006). Involvement of LuxR, a quorum sensing regulator in Vibrio harveyi, in the promotion of metabolic genes: argA, purM, lysE and rluA. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1759, 296–307. doi: 10.1016/j.bbaexp.2006.05.005, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Natesh N. H., Abbey L., Asiedu S. K. (2017). An overview of nutritional and anti nutritional factors in green leafy vegetables. Horticulture. Int. J. 1, 2576–4462. doi: 10.15406/hij.2017.01.00011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Ndlebe L., Tyler N. C., Ciacciariello M. (2023). Effect of varying levels of dietary energy and protein on broiler performance: a review. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 79, 449–465. doi: 10.1080/00439339.2023.2225795 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Offermanns S. (2014). Free fatty acid (FFA) and hydroxy carboxylic acid (HCA) receptors. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 54, 407–434. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011613-135945, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ouwehand A., Isolauri E., Salminen S. (2002). The role of the intestinal microflora for the development of the immune system in early childhood. Eur. J. Nutr. 41, 1–i37. doi: 10.1007/s00394-002-1105-4, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Pandit R. J., Hinsu A. T., Patel N. V., Koringa P. G., Jakhesara S. J., Thakkar J. R., et al. (2018). Microbial diversity and community composition of caecal microbiota in commercial and indigenous Indian chickens determined using 16s rDNA amplicon sequencing. Microbiome 6:115. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0501-9, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Parker B. J., Wearsch P. A., Veloo A. C., Rodriguez-Palacios A. (2020). The genus Alistipes: gut bacteria with emerging implications to inflammation, cancer, and mental health. Front. Immunol. 11:906. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00906, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Prosberg M., Bendtsen F., Vind I., Petersen A. M., Gluud L. L. (2016). The association between the gut microbiota and the inflammatory bowel disease activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 51, 1407–1415. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1216587, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Qiu J., Zhai Y., Wei M., Zheng C., Jiao X. (2022). Toxin–antitoxin systems: classification, biological roles, and applications. Microbiol. Res. 264:127159. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2022.127159, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Rawlings N. D. (2013). “Protease families, evolution and mechanism of action,” in Proteases: Structure and Function. eds.Brix, K., Stöcker, W Vienna, Austria: Springer Vienna.
  61. Ren W., Wang P., Yan J., Liu G., Zeng B., Hussain T., et al. (2018). Melatonin alleviates weanling stress in mice: involvement of intestinal microbiota. J. Pineal Res. 64:e12448. doi: 10.1111/jpi.12448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Russell D. W. (2009). Fifty years of advances in bile acid synthesis and metabolism. J. Lipid Res. 50, S120–S125. doi: 10.1194/jlr.r800026-jlr200, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Rychlik I. (2020). Composition and function of chicken gut microbiota. Animals 10:103. doi: 10.3390/ani10010103, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Santoso S. I., Setiadi A. (2016). Profitable utilization of Giant Salvinia, Salvinia molesta, as local duck feed. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 15, 121–125. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2016.121.125 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Sasaki Y., Uemura R., Sekiguchi S., Takahashi T., Fujii Y., Sueyoshi M. (2014). An analysis of factors affecting production performance in broiler flocks on Japanese commercial farms. Br. Poult. Sci. 55, 737–744. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2014.966057, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Sayed Y., Hassan M., Salem H. M., Al-Amry K., Eid G. E. (2023). Prophylactic influences of prebiotics on gut microbiome and immune response of heat-stressed broiler chickens. Sci. Rep. 13:13991. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40997-7, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Schader C., Muller A., Scialabba N. E.-H., Hecht J., Isensee A., Erb K.-H., et al. (2015). Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability. J. R. Soc. Interface 12:20150891. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0891, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Schauder S., Shokat K., Surette M. G., Bassler B. L. (2001). The LuxS family of bacterial autoinducers: biosynthesis of a novel quorum-sensing signal molecule. Mol. Microbiol. 41, 463–476. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02532.x, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Shen H., Wang T., Dong W., Sun G., Liu J., Peng N., et al. (2024). Metagenome-assembled genome reveals species and functional composition of Jianghan chicken gut microbiota and isolation of Pediococcus acidilactic with probiotic properties. Microbiome 12:25. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01745-1, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Shi S., Qi Z., Jiang W., Quan S., Sheng T., Tu J., et al. (2020). Effects of probiotics on cecal microbiome profile altered by duck Escherichia coli 17 infection in Cherry Valley ducks. Microb. Pathog. 138:103849. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103849, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Smith C. J., Rocha E. R., Paster B. J. (2006). The medically important Bacteroides spp. in health and disease. Prokaryotes 7, 381–427. doi: 10.1007/0-387-30747-8_14 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Stanley D., Hughes R. J., Moore R. J. (2014). Microbiota of the chicken gastrointestinal tract: influence on health, productivity and disease. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 4301–4310. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5646-2, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Sun Y., Li Z., Yan M., Zhao H., He Z., Zhu M. (2024). Responses of intestinal antioxidant capacity, morphology, barrier function, immunity, and microbial diversity to chlorogenic acid in late-peak laying hens. Animals 14:2957. doi: 10.3390/ani14202957, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Tang J., Dong L., Tang M., Arif A., Zhang H., Zhang G., et al. (2025). Metagenomic analysis reveals the characteristics of Cecal microbiota in chickens with different levels of resistance during recovery from Eimeria tenella infection. Animals 15:1500. doi: 10.3390/ani15101500, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Tardiolo G., La Fauci D., Riggio V., Daghio M., Di Salvo E., Zumbo A., et al. (2025). Gut microbiota of ruminants and monogastric livestock: An overview. Animals 15:758. doi: 10.3390/ani15050758, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Trachtman H., Barbour R., Sturman J. A., Finberg L. (1988). Taurine and osmoregulation: taurine is a cerebral osmoprotective molecule in chronic hypernatremic dehydration. Pediatr. Res. 23, 35–39. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198801000-00008, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Uzal F. A., Giannitti F., Asin J. (2022). Yellow lamb disease (Clostridium perfringens type a Enterotoxemia of sheep): a review. Animals 12:1590. doi: 10.3390/ani12121590, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Wang C.-L., Chiang C.-J., Chao Y.-P., Yu B., Lee T.-T. (2015). Effect of cordyceps militaris waster medium on production performance, egg traits and egg yolk cholesterol of laying hens. J. Poult. Sci. 52, 188–196. doi: 10.2141/jpsa.0140191 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Wang T., Tang C., He H., Cao Z., Xiao M., He M., et al. (2024). Evaluation of cordyceps sinensis quality in 15 production areas using metabolomics and the membership function method. J. Fungi 10:356. doi: 10.3390/jof10050356, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Wang Z., Yu J., Zhong S., Fan Z., Wang F., Ji C., et al. (2022). Metabolomic profiling of Dezhou donkey seminal plasma related to freezability. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 57, 1165–1175. doi: 10.1111/rda.14187, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Wexler H. M. (2007). Bacteroides: the good, the bad, and the nitty-gritty. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20, 593–621. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00008-07, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Xu H., Liu Y. (2011). Reduced microbial attachment by D-amino acid-inhibited AI-2 and EPS production. Water Res. 45, 5796–5804. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.061, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Xu L., Shen S., Zhang Y., Guo Z., Lu B., Huang J., et al. (2025). Quantitative RNA pseudouridine landscape reveals dynamic modification patterns and evolutionary conservation across bacterial species. bioRxiv 1824:653745. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.13.653745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Zafar H., Saier M. H., Jr. (2021). Gut Bacteroides species in health and disease. Gut Microbes 13, 1–20. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1848158, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Zhang J., Li A., He Y., Guo T., Ge Y., Pan H., et al. (2025). Parabacteroides goldsteinii mitigates the lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response in IPEC-J2 cells. Front. Vet. Sci. 12:1577126. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1577126, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Zhang X., Wang H., Niu Y., Chen C., Zhang W. (2024). Effects of cottonseed meal protein hydrolysate on intestinal microbiota of yellow-feather broilers. Front. Microbiol. 15:1434252. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1434252, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Zhao J., Quan C., Jin L., Chen M. (2018). Production, detection and application perspectives of quorum sensing autoinducer-2 in bacteria. J. Biotechnol. 268, 53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.01.009, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Zhou N., Chen W., Xia L., Li M., Ye H., Lv C., et al. (2024). Metagenomic insights into the resistome, mobilome, and virulome of dogs with diverse lifestyles. Anim. Microbiome 6:76. doi: 10.1186/s42523-024-00364-x, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Zhou Y., Manghwar H., Hu W., Liu F. (2022). Degradation mechanism of autophagy-related proteins and research progress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23:7301. doi: 10.3390/ijms23137301, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Zhou X., Shen X. (2026). Probiotics modulate the ruminal microbiome and metabolite availability to enhance rumen barrier function and growth performance in goats fed a high-concentrate diet. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 18, 1983–2000. doi: 10.1007/s12602-025-10647-7, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table_1.xlsx (12.3KB, xlsx)
Table_2.xlsx (11.3KB, xlsx)
Table_3.xlsx (10.6KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The data sets presented in this study can be found in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession numbers PRJNA1301039. The metabolomics data have been deposited to MetaboLights repository with the study identifier MTBLS12825.


Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES