Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1971 Aug;216(3):513–529. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009538

Configuration dependence of scotopic spatial summation

B Sakitt
PMCID: PMC1331920  PMID: 5565639

Abstract

1. Psychophysical experiments were done under conditions of complete dark adaptation, 7° in the human temporal retina, using blue-green flashes brief enough to be within the range of complete temporal summation.

2. Frequency-of-seeing experiments were done for two 3·4′ squares separated by 20′ or 23′ and for each square separately. The results were consistent with the hypothesis that the squares acted independently in determining the absolute threshold. There was no observable summation occurring between them.

3. The absolute threshold (50% seeing) for two 3·4′ squares (the centre-to-centre separation varied from 3·4′ to 56′) was measured relative to the absolute threshold for just one such square. It required more photons at the cornea at threshold for two spots than for one such spot, except when they were actually touching.

4. The same subject, in the same retinal region and under otherwise identical test conditions, showed complete spatial summation at absolute threshold for circular spots up to 30′ in diameter.

5. Similar experiments were done on other subjects using 3·4′ squares and lines of width 3·4′. All subjects showed complete summation at absolute threshold for lines 34′ long. All showed lack of spatial summation for two squares unless the two squares touched to form a rectangle.

6. The absolute threshold for N small spots was compared to the absolute threshold for 1 spot, where N varied from 2 to 25. Again complete spatial summation broke down even when all the spots lay within the Ricco area.

7. It was shown that the results are inconsistent with the hypothesis of a linear output and a linear summation of excitations.

8. Various hypotheses are examined and it is shown that no simple hypothesis can explain all the results. The conclusion is that spatial summation at absolute threshold is configuration dependent.

Full text

PDF
513

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARLOW H. B. Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities. J Physiol. 1958 Apr 30;141(2):337–350. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp005978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BOUMAN M. A., BLOKHUIS E. W. M. The visibility of black objects against an illuminated background. J Opt Soc Am. 1952 Aug;42(8):525–528. doi: 10.1364/josa.42.000525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BOUMAN M. A., BRINK G. V. D. On the integrate capacity in time and space of the human peripheral retina. J Opt Soc Am. 1952 Sep;42(9):617–620. doi: 10.1364/josa.42.000617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BOUMAN M. A. Mechanisms in peripheral dark adaptation. J Opt Soc Am. 1952 Dec;42(12):941–950. doi: 10.1364/josa.42.000941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BOUMAN M. A. Visual thresholds for line-shaped targets. J Opt Soc Am. 1953 Mar;43(3):209–211. doi: 10.1364/josa.43.000209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Büttner U., Grüsser O. J. Quantitative Untersuchungen der räumlichen Erregungssummation im rezeptiven Feld retinaler Neurone der Katze. I. Reizung mit 2 synchronen Lichtpunkten. Kybernetik. 1968 Jan;4(3):81–94. doi: 10.1007/BF00288928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DENTON E. J., PIRENNE M. H. Spatial summation at the absolute threshold of peripheral vision. J Physiol. 1952 Mar;116(3):32p–33p. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Easter S. S., Jr Excitation in the goldfish retina: evidence for a non-linear intensity code. J Physiol. 1968 Mar;195(2):253–271. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HALLETT P. E., MARRIOTT F. H., RODGER F. C. The relationship of visual threshold to retinal position and area. J Physiol. 1962 Feb;160:364–373. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hallett P. E. The variations in visual threshold measurement. J Physiol. 1969 Jun;202(2):403–419. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. KINCAID W. M., BLACKWELL H. R., KRISTOFFERSON A. B. Neural formulation of the effects of target size and shape upon visual detection. J Opt Soc Am. 1960 Feb;50:143–148. doi: 10.1364/josa.50.000143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nachmias J., Kocher E. C. Visual detection and discrimination of luminance increments. J Opt Soc Am. 1970 Mar;60(3):382–389. doi: 10.1364/josa.60.000382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. RIOPELLE A. J. Dispersion of stimulus-areas and the scotopic threshold. Am J Psychol. 1951 Jul;64(3):380–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. RUSHTON W. A. The difference spectrum and the photosensitivity of rhodopsin in the living human eye. J Physiol. 1956 Oct 29;134(1):11–29. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. VAN DEN BRINK G., BOUMAN M. A. Variation of integrative actions in the retinal system; an adaptational phenomenon. J Opt Soc Am. 1954 Aug;44(8):616–620. doi: 10.1364/josa.44.000616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. WEALE R. A. Retinal summation and human visual thresholds. Nature. 1958 Jan 18;181(4603):154–156. doi: 10.1038/181154a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Westheimer G. The Maxwellian view. Vision Res. 1966 Dec;6(12):669–682. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(66)90078-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES