Skip to main content
Scientific Data logoLink to Scientific Data
. 2026 Apr 24;13:950. doi: 10.1038/s41597-026-07304-1

Near complete telomere-to-telomere level genome assembly of blackchin tilapia (Sarotherodon melanotheron)

Chun-Yi Zhong 1,2, Ji-Xiang Hua 1, Wen Wang 1, Si-Qi Lu 2, Pao Xu 1,2, Wen-Jing Tao 3, Ya-Lun Dong 2, Jun Qiang 1,2,✉, Yi-Fan Tao 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC13320171  PMID: 42031804

Abstract

The blackchin tilapia (Sarotherodon melanotheron) is a euryhaline teleost, renowned for its exceptional osmoregulatory ability to thrive across a wide salinity range. However, studies on the genome of Sarotherodon melanotheron are limited, impeding the investigative work on genetic selection at the molecular level. With the sequencing technologies, we present a near complete telomere-to-telomere level genome assembly for Sarotherodon melanotheron, which spans 996.95 Mb with a scaffold N50 of 42.04 Mb and is anchored to 22 chromosomes. This genome assembly was generated by integrating multiple sequencing technologies, including short reads, PacBio HiFi long reads, ONT ultra-long reads, and Hi-C data. The genome assembly demonstrated a high degree of completeness, with 98.36% complete BUSCOs were successfully identified. A total of 391.75 Mb repeating elements and 29,328 protein-coding genes were detected through genome assembly. Functional annotation was successfully completed for 92.10% of the 29,328 protein-coding genes, with a BUSCO score of 99.22%. This genome assembly of Sarotherodon melanotheron not only provides critical insights into its biological traits and genetic diversity but also paves the way for future genetic improvement.

Background & Summary

The blackchin tilapia (Sarotherodon melanotheron), a euryhaline fish native to West Africa, exhibits remarkable osmoregulatory abilities, enabling it to thrive in salinities up to 3-4 times that of seawater1. In its natural range, it inhabits freshwater, coastal marine, and estuarine environments from Angola to southern Mauritania2, where it plays a significant role in both capture fisheries and small-scale aquaculture, contributing to the livelihoods of local communities in West Africa. Due to its strong salinity adaptability, Sarotherodon melanotheron has been introduced to China as a promising genetic resource3 to help overcome the challenge of limited freshwater resources and promote sustainable aquaculture development4. Consequently, efforts are now needed to enhance the quality of available germplasm and advance selective breeding methods to support the development of fast-growing strains of Sarotherodon melanotheron, which would benefit the brackish-water aquaculture.

A wealth of research efforts have been dedicated to different field of Sarotherodon melanotheron, including life history5,6, reproductive biology7, genetic diversity8,9, ecology10 and osmoregulatory mechanisms2,11,12. However, owing to the lack of a high-quality reference genome, genetic and functional genomic studies on Sarotherodon melanotheron, has long been stagnant, forcing current research to rely on genomic data from closely related species, such as the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Thus, a high-quality genome assembly for Sarotherodon melanotheron is urgently needed.

In this research, a telomere-to-telomere (T2T) reference genome of the Sarotherodon melanotheron was assembled by integration of Illumina short-sequence reads, PacBio (Pacific Biosciences) HiFi long reads, Hi-C (High-through chromosome conformation capture) sequencing data and ONT (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) ultra-long reads. The assembled genome spans a total length of 996.95 Mb, with a scaffold N50 of 42.04 Mb. The Sarotherodon melanotheron genome contains 29,328 protein-coding genes, 92.10% of which have been functionally annotated. This high-quality genomic dataset is expected to support on species evolution and function research, and molecular breeding of Sarotherodon melanotheron, thereby enhance its economic and ecological values.

Methods

Sample collection

A one-year-old male Sarotherodon melanotheron individual (Fig. 1A) was collected from the Freshwater Fisheries Research Center (FFRC), the Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (Wuxi, Jiangsu). Fresh muscle tissues were sampled for whole genome sequencing. A total of seven distinct tissue types, including muscle, brain, gill, liver, spleen, kidney, skin, were meticulously dissected and procured for transcriptome sequencing. Specifically, the fish was euthanized with 100 mg/L MS-222. Target tissues were then rapidly dissected using sterile scissors and forceps, immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C before usage. This study was approved by the Bioethical Committee of FFRC, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (Approval No. 2013863BCE) and all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (https://arriveguidelines.org).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The genome survey, Hi-C interaction heatmap, and the Contig distribution map of Sarotherodon melanotheron. (A) A photo of the sequenced fish. (B) A GenomeScope k-mer plot. (C) Hi-C interaction heat map for genome assembly of Sarotherodon melanotheron. (D) Distribution maps of contig on chromosomes with annotated telomere locations of Sarotherodon melanotheron. Contig number: Contig count contained within a chromosome.

Genomic DNA extraction and genome sequencing

High-molecular-weight genomic DNA was extracted using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method13. Quality assessment of the extracted DNA was evaluated with a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) and its integrity was further verified by 0.8% agarose gel-electrophoresis. High-quality genomic DNA were submitted to Pisino Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China) for construction and sequencing.

For short-read sequencing, the library was prepared by TruSeq DNA PCR-free prep kit, followed by sequencing on Illumina NovaSeqtm X plus platform (Illumina, MA, USA). After removing reads containing adapter, low-quality and ploy-N, a total of 113.70 Gb of clean data were generated. In parallel, the PacBio HiFi sequencing library was built using the PacBio Template Prep Kit 1.0 and sequenced using a PacBio Revio sequencing platform14. Circular Consensus Sequencing (CCS), implemented in SMRT Link v11.0) software15, was employed to produce high-accuracy consensus reads, which resulted in the acquisition of ~29.41 Gb of HiFi data.

Ultra-long Oxford Nanopore technologies (ONT) sequencing library was constructed by using the Oxford Nanopore SQK-ULK001 kit, followed by sequencing performed on a PromethION platform. Subsequent processing with NECAT v200221 with default parameters yielded 70.12 Gb of ultra-long reads16.

Prepared in accordance with Hi- C library protocol17, the Hi- C library was subjected to sequencing on an Illumina NovaSeqtm X plus platform (Illumina, MA, USA). In total, approximately 112.68 Gb of Hi-C data were generated.

RNA extraction and full-length transcriptome sequencing

Total RNA extraction was performed via a combined protocol integrating TRIzol reagent with an RNAprep Pure Tissue Kit (TIANGEN Biotech). The SMARTer PCR cDNA Synthesis Kit (Clontech) was used to convert RNA into cDNA through reverse transcription. Subsequently, the full-length RNA-seq library was constructed using the SMRTbellTM Template Prep Kit 1.0 (Clontech), followed by sequencing on the PacBio Revio sequencing platform with the SequelTM Sequencing Kit 2.0. A cumulative dataset of 3.59 Gb of full-length RNA-seq data were generated, providing transcriptomic resources for genome annotation.

Genome assembly and telomere identification

The k-mer analysis was utilized to survey the genome features of Sarotherodon melanotheron with the Illumina short reads using Jellyfish (v2.3.0)18, followed by analysis of genome survey with GenomeScope (v2.0)19. Accordingly, the 19-mer analysis was conducted to estimate genomic characteristics of Sarotherodon melanotheron, yielding a predicted genome size of ~1.00 Gb along with a heterozygosity rate of 0.48% (Fig. 1B).

Hifiasm (v0.19.5)20 was employed as the primary assembly tool for PacBio HiFi reads, and the entire process was executed under the software’s default parameter regime. The preliminary assembly was then processed with purge-dups (1.2.5)21 to eliminate redundant sequences, resulting in a primary assembly of ~1.19 Gb with a contig N50 of 2.19 Mb.

The HiC-Pro (v3.1.0)22 pipeline was employed to detect valid contact paired reads. The valid reads were processed through the 3D-DNA (parameters: ‘-r 0’)23 pipeline to anchor the contigs onto chromosomes. To address the existing sequence gaps, ultra-long ONT reads were integrated to generate gapless scaffolds via TGS-GapCloser v1.1.124 software. To improve the accuracy, genome polishing was performed via Nextpolish2 (0.2.2)25. Consequently, we generated the final genome assembly of Sarotherodon melanotheron, which spanned a total size of 996.95 Mb and is anchored into 22 chromosomes (Fig. 1C,D and Table 1). Its scaffold N50 reaches 42.04 Mb. By performing a genome-wide search with tidk (0.2.0) software26, We additionally detected the distribution and frequency of characteristic sequences (AAACCCT/AGGGTTT) in the telomere region. Ultimately, we identified that the chromosomes of Sarotherodon melanotheron possessed 22 centromeres and 28 telomeres (Table 2).

Table 1.

Statistics of sequencing data for Sarotherodon melanotheron genome assembly and annotation.

Sequencing Library Category Raw Sequencing data (Gb) Filtered High-Quality Data (Gb) Reads Mean Length (bp) Reads N50 (bp) Coverage
Short reads Seq 117.23 113.70 150 / 117.59×
PacBio HiFi 29.41 / 17,006 17,489 29.50×
Hi-C 112.68 111.21 150 / 113.02×
ONT 70.12 / 96,738 100,000 70.33×
RNA-seq 3.59 / 2391 2587 /

Table 2.

Positions of telomere and centromere in the genome assembly of Sarotherodon melanotheron.

ID Sequence Length (bp) Gaps Centromere Telomere
Start End Upstream_start Upstream_end Downstream start Downstream end
chr1 43,199,739 0 7,144,231 7,927,647 1 6,420 43,194,000 43,199,739
chr2 38,260,850 0 4,899,747 5,255,485 38,257,740 38,260,850
chr3 40,418,258 0 4,766,282 5,721,992 40,412,220 40,418,258
chr4 42,462,704 0 35,562,982 35,934,491 1 5,280
chr5 46,711,762 0 5,110,814 5,395,957 1 5,580 46,708,260 46,711,762
chr6 66,404,432 0 11,588,952 12,341,885 66,398,760 66,404,432
chr7 33,122,763 0 29,151,010 29,559,986 1 5,640
chr8 40,879,768 1 32,776,741 33,810,785 1 7,620
chr9 36,122,824 0 7,363,347 8,498,578 1 6,420 36,117,840 36,122,824
chr10 40,620,852 0 5,540,840 5,867,869 40,614,180 40,620,852
chr11 42,862,210 0 3,827,087 6,959,636 1 5,880 42,858,660 42,862,210
chr12 35,091,674 0 28,864,758 29,102,502 1 5,040
chr13 42,909,168 0 8,759,869 9,180,329 42,903,480 42,909,168
chr14 42,042,471 0 28,969,239 29,558,050 1 6,300 42,036,240 42,042,471
chr15 39,569,484 0 36,909,899 39,569,484 1 6,180
chr16 40,803,323 0 40,094,076 40,803,323 1 6,540
chr17 41,030,710 0 4,341,130 5,054,290 1 5,580 41,024,100 41,030,710
chr18 35,514,925 0 6,061,678 6,813,910 1 4,800 35,509,740 35,514,925
chr19 41,544,819 1 16,161,476 16,706,447 1 6,060
chr20 42,410,651 0 4,310,990 4,525,240 1 6,480
chr21 46,688,682 0 4,083,033 4,164,081 1 4,980
chr22 118,277,041 0 13,322,249 13,892,378

Genome annotation

A comprehensive annotation pipeline for repetitive sequences was established, combining de novo prediction and homology-based strategies to detect repetitive sequences in the Sarotherodon melanotheron genome. For the de novo prediction, a custom repeat library was constructed via RepeatModeler v2.0.427, a computational tool which can initiate two de novo repeat finding programs of RECON v1.0.828 and RepeatScout v1.0.629. Afterwards, the homology-based alignment was performed utilizing the RepBase database (v20150807) by RepeatMasker v4.1.430. A total of 1,501,443 repetitive elements were identified, constituting 39.3% of the entire assembled genome (Table 3). Among these repetitive elements, DNA transposons were the most prevalent at a proportion of 17.59%, followed by long interspersed elements (LINEs, 9.69%), long terminal repeats (LTRs, 4.21%), and Rolling-circles (1.33%) (Fig. 2, Table 3).

Table 3.

Statistics of repetitive sequences in Sarotherodon melanotheron.

Elements Elements Count Length (bp) Genome Percentage (%)
Retroelements/SINEs 41,422 5,659,241 0.57
Retroelements/LINEs 279,225 96,623,271 9.69
Retroelements/LTRs 124,949 41,963,614 4.21
 BEL/Pao 7,148 3,320,577 0.33
 Ty1/Copia 5,739 1,885,174 0.19
 Gypsy/DIRS1 36,725 14,141,033 1.42
 others 75,337 22,616,830 2.27
DNA transposons 718,204 175,328,581 17.59
 hobo-Activator 202,843 57,798,324 5.80
 Tc1-IS630-Pogo 191,325 57,358,889 5.75
 MULE-MuDR 4,022 327,517 0.03
 PiggyBac 17,476 3,381,431 0.34
 Tourist/Harbinger 24,762 6,179,445 0.62
 others 277,776 50,282,975 5.05
Rolling-circles 29,605 13,286,822 1.33
Unclassified 300,459 56,436,253 5.66
Satellites 5,803 2,413,521 0.24
Simple repeats 1,776 73,855 0.01
Total repeats 1,501,443 391,785,158 39.3

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Features of Sarotherodon melanotheron genome assembly. Tracks from outer to inner represent (a) Length of chromosome; (b) GC content distribution; (c) Density of genomic code gene; (d) Density of repetitive sequence; (e) Density of long terminal repeat (LTR) element; (f) Density of Gypsy elements; (g) Density of Copia elements; (h) Density of DNA transposon; (i) The interconnections within the circle represent syntenic gene pairs.

Gene prediction and annotation. To systematically annotate protein-coding genes, a combination of three approaches including de novo gene prediction, homology-based annotation, and transcriptome-based annotation was applied in this research. The de novo predictions of protein-coding genes were performed via four software tools, Augustus(v3.3.2)31, SNAP(v2017-03-01)32, GlimmerHMM (v3.0.4)33 and GeneMark (v4.71)34. And for homology-based prediction, we downloaded the protein sequences of 5 closely related representative fish species from NCBI, including Oreochromis niloticus, Simochromis diagramma, Oreochromis aureus, Astatotilapia calliptera and Haplochromis burtoni. After acquiring genomic data, sequence alignment was performed against the Sarotherodon melanotheron T2T genome using GeMoMa v2.335 and Exonerate (v2.2.0)36. For transcriptome-based prediction, the de novo assembly of full-length RNA-Seq datasets was performed using the software Trinity (r20140717)37. Subsequently, the gene structure of the assembled transcripts were annotated with the software PASA (2.5.2)38. Ultimately, a comprehensive gene annotation was implemented in EvidenceModeler (r2012-06-25), which integrated the results of de novo gene predictions, homology-based predictions, and transcriptome-based predictions39. Consequently, 29,328 protein-coding genes were successfully identified, with the average length of individual gene reaching 18,699.6 bp and the average length of transcription sequence measuring 1,647.4 bp. According to the statistical analysis, the average number of exons per gene was 9.58, with exons and introns having average length of 171.9 bp and 1,987 bp respectively (Table 4). Comparative analyses of the statistical characteristics of gene set elements between Sarotherodon melanotheron and other five closely related species revealed similar distribution patterns (Fig. 3).

Table 4.

Statistics of predicted protein-coding genes in Sarotherodon melanotheron.

Statistic Value
Total length of genes (bp) 548,424,058
Genes proportion of genome (%) 55.01
Total number of genes 29,328
Average length of gene (bp) 18,699.6
Total exon number 281,016
Average exon length (bp) 171.9
Average length of introns 1,987
Total length of CDSs 48,316,575
Proportion of CDSs in the genome (%) 4.85
Average transcription length (bp) 1,647.4

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparisons of the statistical characteristics of the gene set elements between Sarotherodon melanotheron, Oreochromis niloticus, Simochromis diagramma, Oreochromis aureus, Astatotilapia calliptera and Haplochromis burtoni. (A) Distributions of gene length. (B) Distributions of CDS length. (C) Distributions of exon length. (D) Distributions of intron length distributions.

To conduct functional annotation of the predicted protein-coding genes, the constructed gene set was aligned against publicly accessible functional databases. More specifically, sequence similarity search (with an E-value threshold 1e-5) was conducted via DIAMOND blastp (2.0.14.152)40 against the NCBI NR (Non-Redundant Protein Sequence) and SWISS-Prot databases. GO (Gene Ontology) and Pfam (Protein Family Database) annotations were generated via InterProScan (5.61–93.0)41, which was applied to perform domain similarity searches against respective functional database. In addition, the KEGG Automatic Annotation Server (KAAS)42 was used for KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes annotation, with the aim of mapping these predicted protein-coding genes to their relevant KEGG pathways. As a consequence, 27,010 genes (92.10% of the predicted genes in Sarotherodon melanotheron were annotated in at least a single functional database (Table 5).

Table 5.

Functional annotation statistics of identified protein-coding genes in Sarotherodon melanotheron.

Database Number Percent (%)
Total / 29328 100
Annotated NR 26998 92.06
Swiss-Prot 22910 78.12
Pfam 23096 78.75
KEGG 17729 60.45
GO 18434 62.85
Unannotated / 2318 7.90

Non-coding RNA prediction and annotation. tRNA genes annotation across the whole gene was accomplished with, TRNAscan-SE (1.3.1)43, whereas rRNA gene prediction was performed with RNAmmer (1.2)44.For other non-coding RNAs prediction, prediction analysis mainly relied on sequence aliganment against the Rfam database (1.0)45. A total of 5,127 non-coding RNAs were identified with average length of 111.80 bp and cumulative length of 573,201 bp, accounting for approximately 0.0575% of the entire genome (Table 6).

Table 6.

Annotation statistics of identified non-coding RNA in Sarotherodon melanotheron.

Type Copy number Average length (bp) Total length (bp) Percentage of genome (%)
18 s rRNA 17 1,861.12 31,639 0.0032
28 s rRNA 20 4,782.70 95,654 0.0096
tRNA 3,298 75.32 248,404 0.0249
others 1,792 110.21 197,504 0.0198

Data Records

The Illumina short-read sequencing data were deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) at the National Genomics Data Centre (NGDC), part of the China National Centre for Bioinformation (CNCB)/Beijing Genomics Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, under the accession number CRR242448646. The PacBio HiFi sequencing data were deposited in GSA at NGDC under the accession number CRR242448547. The Hi-C sequencing data were deposited in GSA at NGDC under the accession number CRR242448748. The ONT ultra-long sequencing data were deposited in GSA at NGDC under the accession number CRR242448449. The full-length transcriptome sequencing data were deposited in GSA at NGDC under the accession number CRR242448850. The assembled genome sequences have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under the accession number GCA_982250375.151. The genome annotation files have been deposited at Figshare52.

Technical Validation

BUSCO, v5.4.553, coupled with arthropoda_odb10 database were employed to evaluate the completeness and accuracy of Sarotherodon melanotheron genome assembly. The BUSCO evaluation results demonstrated that 3299 (98.36%) BUSCOs were identified as complete, among these, 3269 (97.47%) were classified as single-copy and 30 (0.89%) as duplicated ones, respectively (Table 7). These findings confirm a good quality of the genome. Chromosome numbers of the Sarotherodon melanotheron genome were confirmed by the Hi-C (Fig. 1C).

Table 7.

BUSCO assessment results of the Sarotherodon melanotheron genome assembly and annotation.

Item Assembly Annotation
Number Percent (%) Number Percent (%)
Count of Complete BUSCOs (C) 3,299 98.36 3,328 99.22
Fully matched single-copy BUSCOs (S) 3,269 97.47 3,268 97.44
Fully matched duplicated BUSCOs (D) 30 0.89 60 1.79
Fragmented BUSCOs (F) 17 0.51 2 0.06
Unidentified BUSCOs (M) 38 1.13 24 0.72
Total BUSCO groups searched 3354 100 3354 100

An addition BUSCO assessment was performed to evaluate the annotation quality of protein-coding genes and revealed 99.22% completeness, with 97.44% single-copy, 1.79% duplicated, and 0.06% fragmented orthologs, confirming high-quality gene annotation.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by National Key Research & Development Program of China (2022YFE0139600) and the Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation for Young Scholar (BK20240325).

Author contributions

J.Q. and Y.T. conceived and designed the project. S.L. and Y.D. collected the experimental samples for this study. W.W. and J.H., performed the genome assembly and conducted bioinformatics analysis. C.Z. and Y.T. drafted the manuscript. J.Q., P.X. and W.T., provided detailed guidelines for manuscript refinement and made revisions to the manuscript. All authors have read the final manuscript carefully and endorsed the final draft of the manuscript.

Data availability

The genome sequencing data, including Illumina short-read, PacBio HiFi, Hi-C, and ONT ultra-long, can be publicly available from the NGDC GSA database under the accession number CRR2424486, CRR2424485, CRR2424487, and CRR2424484. The full-length transcriptome sequencing data used for genome annotation also can be publicly obtained from the NGDC GSA database under the accession number CRR2424488. The genome assembly can be publicly available from the ENA under accession number GCA_982250375.1. The genome annotation files can be publicly downloaded at Figshare (10.6084/m9.figshare.31282306.v2).

Code availability

All scripts and pipelines applied to genome assembly and gene annotation strictly followed the standard manuals and protocols of the utilized bioinformatics software. Notably, no specific code was developed for this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Jun Qiang, Email: qiangj@ffrc.cn.

Yi-Fan Tao, Email: taoyifan@ffrc.cn.

References

  • 1.Ouattara, N. G. et al. Changes in gill ionocyte morphology and function following transfer from fresh to hypersaline waters in the tilapia Sarotherodon melanotheron. Aquaculture290, 155–164 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Blondeau-Bidet, E., Tine, M., Gonzalez, A. A., Guinand, B. & Lorin-Nebel, C. Coping with salinity extremes: Gill transcriptome profiling in the black-chinned tilapia (Sarotherodon melanotheron). Sci. Total Environ.929, 172620 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fan, W. J. & Li, S. F. Isolation and characterization of insulin-like growth factor Ib in Sarotherodon melanotheron: cDNA cloning and mRNA expression. Isr. J. Aquacult. - Bamid.63, 591 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhang, W. B. et al. Aquaculture will continue to depend more on land than sea. Nature603, E2–E4 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Labonne, M. et al. Impact of salinity on early life history traits of three estuarine fish species in Senegal. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.82, 673–681 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Panfili, J. et al. Influence of salinity on the life-history traits of the West African black-chinned tilapia (Sarotherodon melanotheron): Comparison between the Gambia and Saloum estuaries. Aquat. Living Resour.17, 65–74 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dugue, R. et al. Egg production in the euryhaline tilapia, Sarotherodon melanotheron heudelotii, experimentally maintained in fresh, sea and hypersaline waters. Aquat. Living Resour.27, 63–72 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Amoussou, T. O. et al. Genetic characterization of Benin’s wild populations of Sarotherodon melanotheron melanotheron Ruppell, 1852. Mol. Biol. Rep.45, 1981–1994 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yoboue, A. N. et al. Genetic diversity and adaptability of Sarotherodon melanotheron (Cichlidae) in coastal ecosystem. Ethol. Ecol. Evol.24, 230–243 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hountcheme, C. A. I., Montcho, S. A., Agadjihouede, H. & Banaduc, D. The temporal dynamics of the impact of overfishing on the resilience of the Sarotherodon melanotheron (Rüppel, 1858) fish species’ population in the west african Lake Toho. Fishes10, 357 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tine, M. et al. Transcriptional responses of the black-chinned tilapia Sarotherodon melanotheron to salinity extremes. Mar. Genom.1, 37–46 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Avarre, J. C. et al. Analysis of the black-chinned tilapia Sarotherodon melanotheron heudelotii reproducing under a wide range of salinities: from RNA-seq to candidate genes. Mol. Ecol. Resour.14, 139–149 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Allen, G. C., Flores-Vergara, M. A., Krasynanski, S., Kumar, S. & Thompson, W. F. A modified protocol for rapid DNA isolation from plant tissues using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. Nat. Protoc.1, 2320–2325 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rhoads, A. & Au, K. F. PacBio sequencing and its applications. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform.13, 278–289 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chin, C. S. et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat. Methods10, 563–569 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen, Y. et al. Efficient assembly of nanopore reads via highly accurate and intact error correction. Nat. Commun.12, 60 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rao, S. S. P. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell159, 1665–1680 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Marcais, G. & Kingsford, C. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics27, 764–770 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ranallo-Benavidez, T. R., Jaron, K. S. & Schatz, M. C. GenomeScope 2.0 and Smudgeplot for reference-free profiling of polyploid genomes. Nat. Commun.11, 1432 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cheng, H. Y., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X. W., Zhang, H. W. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods18, 170–175 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Guan, D. F. et al. Identifying and removing haplotypic duplication in primary genome assemblies. Bioinformatics36, 2896–2898 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Servant, N. et al. HiC-Pro: an optimized and flexible pipeline for Hi-C data processing. Genome Biol.16, 259 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dudchenko, O. et al. De novo assembly of the Aedes aegypti genome using Hi-C yields chromosome-length scaffolds. Science356, 92–95 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Xu, M. Y., Guo, L. D., Gu, S. Q., Wang, O. & Zhang, Y. W. TGS-GapCloser: A fast and accurate gap closer for large genomes with low coverage of error-prone long reads. GigaScience9, giaa094 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hu, J. et al. NextPolish2: A Repeat-aware Polishing Tool for Genomes Assembled Using HiFi Long Reads. Genom. Proteom. Bioinf.22, qzad009 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brown, M. R., de La Rosa, P. M. G. & Blaxter, M. tidk: a toolkit to rapidly identify telomeric repeats from genomic datasets. Bioinformatics41 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 27.Flynn, J. M. et al. RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA117, 9451–9457 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bao, Z. R. & Eddy, S. R. Automated de novo identification of repeat sequence families in sequenced genomes. Genome Res.12, 1269–1276 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Price, A. L., Jones, N. C. & Pevzner, P. A. De novo identification of repeat families in large genomes. Bioinformatics21, I351–I358 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bao, W. D., Kojima, K. K. & Kohany, O. Repbase Update, a database of repetitive elements in eukaryotic genomes. Mobile DNA6, 11 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hoff, K. J. & Stanke, M. Predicting Genes in Single Genomes with AUGUSTUS. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics65, e57 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ian, K. Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinformatics5, 59 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Majoros, W., Pertea, M. & Salzberg, S. TigrScan and GlimmerHMM: two open source ab initio eukaryotic gene-finders. Bioinformatics20, 2878–2879 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.John, B. & Mark, B. GeneMark: web software for gene finding in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and viruses. Nucleic Acids Res.33, 451–454 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jens, K. et al. Using intron position conservation for homology-based gene prediction. Nucleic Acids Res.44, e89 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Slater, G. S. & Birney, E. Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. Bmc Bioinformatics6, 31 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc.8, 1494–1512 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Haas, B. J. et al. Improving the Arabidopsis genome annotation using maximal transcript alignment assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res.31, 5654–5666 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Haas, B. J. et al. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biol.9, R7 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li, C. X., Gao, M. X., Yang, W. X., Zhong, C. Q. & Yu, R. S. Diamond: a multi-modal DIA mass spectrometry data processing pipeline. Bioinformatics37, 265–267 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jones, P. et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics30, 1236–1240 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yuki, M., Masumi, I., Shujiro, O., Yoshizawa, A. C. & Minoru, K. KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res.35, W182–W185 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lowe, T. M. & Chan, P. P. tRNAscan-SE On-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res.44, W54–W57 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lagesen, K. et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res.35, 3100–3108 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Griffiths-Jones, S. et al. Rfam: annotating non-coding RNAs in complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res.33, D121–D124 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.NGDC Genome Sequence Archivehttps://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA034896/CRR2424486 (2025).
  • 47.NGDC Genome Sequence Archivehttps://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA034896/CRR2424485 (2025).
  • 48.NGDC Genome Sequence Archivehttps://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA034896/CRR2424487 (2025).
  • 49.NGDC Genome Sequence Archivehttps://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA034896/CRR2424484 (2025).
  • 50.NGDC Genome Sequence Archivehttps://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA034896/CRR2424488 (2025).
  • 51.ENAhttps://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/GCA_982250375 (2026).
  • 52.Tao, Y. F. Telomere-to-telomere genome assembly of blackchin tilapia (Sarotherodon melanotheron). figshare10.6084/m9.figshare.31282306.v2 (2026).
  • 53.Simao, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics31, 3210–3212 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. NGDC Genome Sequence Archivehttps://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA034896/CRR2424486 (2025).
  2. NGDC Genome Sequence Archivehttps://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA034896/CRR2424485 (2025).
  3. NGDC Genome Sequence Archivehttps://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA034896/CRR2424487 (2025).
  4. NGDC Genome Sequence Archivehttps://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA034896/CRR2424484 (2025).
  5. NGDC Genome Sequence Archivehttps://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/browse/CRA034896/CRR2424488 (2025).
  6. ENAhttps://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/GCA_982250375 (2026).
  7. Tao, Y. F. Telomere-to-telomere genome assembly of blackchin tilapia (Sarotherodon melanotheron). figshare10.6084/m9.figshare.31282306.v2 (2026).

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequencing data, including Illumina short-read, PacBio HiFi, Hi-C, and ONT ultra-long, can be publicly available from the NGDC GSA database under the accession number CRR2424486, CRR2424485, CRR2424487, and CRR2424484. The full-length transcriptome sequencing data used for genome annotation also can be publicly obtained from the NGDC GSA database under the accession number CRR2424488. The genome assembly can be publicly available from the ENA under accession number GCA_982250375.1. The genome annotation files can be publicly downloaded at Figshare (10.6084/m9.figshare.31282306.v2).

All scripts and pipelines applied to genome assembly and gene annotation strictly followed the standard manuals and protocols of the utilized bioinformatics software. Notably, no specific code was developed for this study.


Articles from Scientific Data are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES