Summary
We report the emergence of KPC-261, a KPC-2 variant identified in a Klebsiella pneumoniae strain exhibiting high-level resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA). Comparative sequence analysis revealed a repeated insertion event between amino acid positions 261–280, highlighting a mutational hotspot linked to reduced avibactam binding. Our findings uncover a structural mechanism driving CZA resistance and broaden our understanding of β-lactamase evolution.
Subject areas: clinical microbiology
Graphical abstract

Highlights
-
•
KPC-261, a new KPC-2 variant, confers ceftazidime-avibactam resistance
-
•
Insertion-duplication at residues 261–280 is a CZA resistance hotspot
-
•
KPC-261 weakens avibactam binding (−7.1654 to −6.15 kcal/mol) via altered residues
-
•
KPC-261 shows a trade-off: 88% reduced ceftazidime efficiency and 7.2-fold higher IC50
clinical microbiology
Introduction
Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) remains a significant global health concern due to its resistance to a wide range of antibiotics, especially carbapenems.1 Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) has become a critical therapeutic option against infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC, K. pneumoniae)-producing strains.2 However, increasing reports of CZA resistance, often mediated by blaKPC genes, are compromising its clinical effectiveness.3 Notably, resistance can emerge both prior to clinical use of CZA and during therapy, highlighting an urgent challenge.4 Of particular concern is the emergence of high-level CZA resistance among strains harboring KPC-2 variants.5,6 This phenotype is driven by the fact that resistance in KPC-producing K. pneumoniae is frequently associated with amino acid substitutions, insertions, and deletions in the blaKPC gene, primarily arising from blaKPC-2 or blaKPC-3.7 To date, more than 280 KPC variants have been reported, with mutations clustering in hotspot regions such as the Ω-loop (amino acid positions 164–179), loop 237–243, and loop 267–275.8 Protein engineering and clinical surveillance have revealed a remarkable diversity of Ω-loop alterations. The substitution of aspartate at position 179, a key residue for stabilizing the Ω-loop structure, to tyrosine (D179Y, corresponding to KPC-33) is one of the most common and well-characterized mechanisms of CZA resistance observed in vitro and in clinical settings.9
Collectively, these diverse Ω-loop mutations drive a characteristic resistance phenotype: they confer high-level resistance to CZA by enhancing ceftazidime affinity or hydrolysis while reducing the inhibitory potency of avibactam.10 Concurrently, many of these mutations significantly impair carbapenemase activity, often restoring susceptibility to carbapenems like meropenem and imipenem.11 This “trade-off” in resistance profiles presents a complex challenge for clinical management. For instance, a newly KPC-135 variant has been reported in the ST11-K47 hypervirulent strain, featuring a deletion of Glu168 and Leu169, which enhanced ceftazidime binding while reducing avibactam susceptibility, thereby conferring resistance to CZA.12 Moreover, the evolution of blaKPC-2 into blaKPC-189, via alanine-threonine and aspartate-tyrosine substitutions, led to decreased CZA susceptibility due to altered drug binding affinity.13 They represent evolutionary pathways where blaKPC-2, under antibiotic pressure, acquires CZA resistance through diverse genetic alterations in the Ω-loop and other key regions.
Results
Clinical isolation and genomic features of a CZA-resistant K. pneumoniae strain
We isolated an ST11-KL64 K. pneumoniae strain L3859 from the stool of a 70-year-old male patient with severe pneumonia and septicemia, who had received CZA therapy for 1 week prior to isolation. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) confirmed high-level resistance to CZA (Table 1). Whole-genome sequencing revealed that strain L3859 harbored a new blaKPC allele, designated blaKPC-261, along with multiple other resistance genes including rmtB, blaCTX-M-65, blaSHV-12, blaTEM-1B, blaLAP-2, fosA6, catA2, qnrS1, sul2, tetA, and dfrA14. Furthermore, two virulence gene clusters encoding siderophores (iutA/iucABCD) and polysaccharide virulence genes (rmpA2) were identified, which are often associated with a hypervirulent phenotype. To investigate the resistance mechanism, we performed gene knockout experiments, plasmid construction, growth curve analysis, and AST. Whole-genome sequencing was performed, and plasmid profiles were examined using S1-PFGE, Southern blotting, and bioinformatics tools.
Table 1.
Antimicrobial drug susceptibility profiles
| MIC (mg/L)/antimicrobial susceptibility | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibiotic | L3859 | L3859/ΔblaKPC | Stbl2/pHSG398 | Stbl2/pHSG398:blaKPC-261_p- | Stbl2/pHSG398:blaKPC-261_p+ |
| Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid | 64/32/R | 64/32/R | 4/2/S | 4/2/S | 16/8/I |
| Piperacillin/tazobactam | >128/4//R | >128/4//R | 8/4/S | 0.5/4/S | 4/4/S |
| Ceftazidime | >128/R | >128/R | 0.5/S | 16/R | 128/R |
| Ceftazidime/avibactam | >128/4/R | 2/4/S | 0.25/4/S | ≤0.03/4/S | 8/4/S |
| Ceftriaxone | >128/R | >128/R | 0.06/S | 1/S | 16/R |
| Cefotaxime | >128/R | >128/R | 0.125/S | 0.5/S | 8/R |
| Cefepime | 128/R | 64/R | 0.125/S | 0.5/S | 8/SDD |
| Aztreonam | >128/R | >128/R | 0.25/S | 0.25/S | 1/S |
| Imipenem | 1/S | 1/S | 0.25/S | 0.25/S | 0.5/S |
| Meropenem | 2/I | 0.25/S | ≤0.008/S | ≤0.008/S | 0.03/S |
| Amikacin | >128/R | >128/R | 4/S | 0.5/S | 0.5/S |
| Gentamicin | >128/R | >128/R | 2/S | 0.5/S | ≤0.25/S |
| Ciprofloxacin | >64/R | >64/R | ≤0.004/S | 0.03/S | ≤0.004/S |
| Levofloxacin | 64/R | 64/R | ≤0.008/S | 0.125/S | ≤0.008/S |
| Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole | 8/152/R | 8/152/R | ≤0.125/2.375/S | ≤0.125/2.375/S | ≤0.125/2.375/S |
| Fosfomycin | 256/R | 256/R | 0.5/S | ≤0.25/S | 2/S |
| Tigecycline | 0.5/S | 0.5/S | 0.125/S | 0.125/S | 0.25/S |
| Chloramphenicol | >128/R | >128/R | 128/R | >128/R | >128/R |
| Polymixin B | 0.5/I | 0.25/I | 0.25/I | 0.25/I | 0.25/I |
S, susceptible; R, resistont; I, intermediate; SDD, susceptible-dose dependent.
Plasmid localization and sequence analysis of blaKPC-261
Sequence analysis, S1-PFGE, and hybridization (Figure 1A), revealed the presence of six plasmids. The blaKPC gene was located on a ∼134 kb IncFII plasmid, showing high homology to CP054728, CP095365, CP082767, and CP033956 (Figure 1B), all plasmids shared similar IS26-tnpR-ISKpn27-blaKPC-klcA-hin-TnAs1 configurations. Sequence alignment revealed that the blaKPC gene exhibited high similarity to blaKPC-58, differing by a G to T substitution at nucleotide position 532 and a six-nucleotide deletion at positions 810–815 (Figure 1C). In contrast, when compared to blaKPC-2, both blaKPC-261 and blaKPC-58 carried repeated insertions, indicating a shared structural alteration contributing to CZA resistance. This unique mutation pattern led to the classification of this newly allele as blaKPC-261, which has been submitted to the NCBI database.
Figure 1.
Genetic, phenotypic, and structural comparisons of KPC-261 and related insertion-duplication variants
(A) Plasmid profiling by S1-PFGE and Southern blotting.
(B) Comparative analysis of plasmid and mapping.
(C) DNA sequence alignment diagram of blaKPC-2, blaKPC-261, and blaKPC-58.
(D) Protein sequence alignment diagram of KPC-2, KPC-261 and KPC-58.
(E) Growth curve assay, data are represented as mean ± SEM.
(F) Protein sequence alignment of KPC-261 with 72 insertion-duplication variants.
(G) Docking simulation of KPC-2 with avibactam.
(H) Docking simulation of KPC-261 with avibactam.
(I) DNA sequence alignment of blaKPC-261 with 72 insertion-duplication variants.
Phylogenetic analysis reveals conserved insertion hotspots in CZA-resistant KPC variants
Phylogenetic analysis of 232 known blaKPC alleles revealed 72 variants containing insertion-duplication mutations. Most of these were linked to CZA resistance. Comparative alignment of these alleles with KPC-2 and KPC-261 identified conserved insertion hotspots, including a 6-bp duplication of GAGCTG at position 493, and tandem duplications between positions 808 and 820 (Figure 1I). At the protein level, this corresponds to the duplication of Glu165-Leu166 (Glu165_Leu166dup) in the Ω-loop and diverse insertions at residues 270–273 in the C-terminal domain (Figure 1F).
Structural modeling and docking predict altered avibactam binding in KPC-261
Protein structural modeling via Swiss-Model revealed a D179Y substitution in the Ω-loop and a six-residue insertion (residues 270–275) in the C-terminal domain of KPC-261 (Figure 1D), where Asp was replaced to Tyr. These alterations are predicted to influence the active site geometry and the electrostatic environment of the substrate-binding cleft, potentially enhancing catalytic activity against β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, such as CZA. Molecular docking simulations using AutoDock Vina 1.2.0 showed that avibactam formed hydrogen bonds with GLU166, ASN132, SER70, THR237, and ASN170 in KPC-2 (Figure 1G) with a binding energy of −7.1654 kcal/mol. In contrast, avibactam interaction with KPC-261 involved residues SER130, ASN132, LYS73, and SER70, with a weaker binding affinity of −6.15 kcal/mol (Figure 1H), suggesting reduced inhibitor efficacy due to structural alterations.
Genetic complementation confirms the role of blaKPC-261 in CZA resistance
To confirm the role of blaKPC-261 in CZA resistance, we created a gene knockout mutant (L3859/ΔblaKPC) using the suicide plasmid pCVD442AX and Escherichia coli (E. coli) β2155. The knockout strain exhibited restored susceptibility to CZA. To further validate this, we cloned blaKPC-261 into the pHSG398 vector with (pHSG398 blaKPC-261_p+) and without (pHSG398 blaKPC-261_p−) its native promoter, and introduced them into E. coli Stbl2 by electroporation.
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing showed that the strain harboring pHSG398b blaKPC-261_p+ exhibited significantly higher resistance to CZA than the promoterless counterpart. Growth curve assays demonstrated no substantial fitness differences between L3859 and its ΔblaKPC isogenic mutant, while the E. coli Stbl2 strains with KPC-261 constructs showed slightly increased biomass yield compared to the empty vector control (Figure 1E).
Enzymatic kinetics demonstrate altered substrate hydrolysis and reduced avibactam susceptibility
Enzymatic kinetic analysis revealed that the KPC-261 variant induced distinct and substrate-dependent alterations in catalytic efficiency and inhibitor susceptibility compared to wild-type KPC-2 (Table 2). Against ceftazidime, KPC-261 exhibited a pronounced ∼88% reduction in catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km), primarily driven by a marked decrease in turnover number (kcat from 27 to 2.54 s−1). A more moderate decline was observed against meropenem (∼55% reduction in kcat/Km). Hydrolysis of imipenem was severely compromised, with an ∼85% reduction in efficiency. Notably, the variant demonstrated significantly diminished susceptibility to avibactam inhibition, with the IC50 value increasing approximately 7.2-fold compared to KPC-2.
Table 2.
Kinetic parameters and IC50 of purified KPC-2 and KPC-261
| Drug | KPC-2 | KPC-261 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kcat (s−1) | Km (μM) | kcat/Km (μM−1s−1) | IC50 (μM) | kcat (s−1) | Km (μM) | kcat/Km (μM−1s−1) | IC50 (μM) | |
| Meropenem | 69.6 | 330 | 0.210 | / | 10.7 | 113 | 0.095 | / |
| Imipenem | 153.3 | 540 | 0.280 | / | 11.6 | 273 | 0.042 | / |
| Ceftazidime | 27.0 | 370 | 0.073 | / | 2.5 | 270 | 0.009 | / |
| Avibactam | / | / | / | 5.2 | / | / | / | 37.4 |
Discussion
The resistance patterns of CZA in KPC-producing K. pneumoniae are frequently attributed to alterations in the enzyme’s active site, particularly in the Ω-loop. Variants such as blaKPC-33, blaKPC-86, and blaKPC-129, affects the enzyme’s ability to hydrolyze β-lactams and mediate resistance.14 Although these mutations often impair carbapenemase activity and reduce bacterial fitness,15,16 insertions or duplications in secondary structural regions may confer resistance without compromising catalytic efficiency. Nevertheless, the molecular basis and clinical implications of such structural rearrangements remain insufficiently explored. Here, we characterize the strain L3859 carrying the newly KPC-261 variant, which displays high-level resistance to CZA while maintaining partial resistance to imipenem. Sequence analysis revealed that most KPC-2 variants associated with CZA resistance carry repeated insertions in the 261–280 amino acid region.
The profile of KPC-261 aligns with the evolutionary pattern of KPC variants under CZA selective pressure, characterized by a functional trade-off to evade inhibition.17,18 The drastically impaired ceftazidime hydrolysis is a core mechanism for CZA resistance, commonly seen in variants with mutations in key loops.19 The concurrent reduction in carbapenem hydrolysis efficiency, particularly for imipenem, suggests a potential “resistance trade-off,” reminiscent of variants like KPC-151, which regain carbapenem susceptibility while resisting CZA.20 The markedly reduced avibactam sensitivity (elevated IC50) is the direct biochemical basis for CZA failure, a phenomenon consistently reported in newly variants such as KPC-176 and KPC-78.21,22 This kinetic compromise underscores that resistance evolution can involve collateral damage to enzymatic function.23 Clinically, while CZA is compromised, this broad functional impairment may inform the evaluation of alternative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations.18,24
Importantly, the strain L3859 also harbors two virulence gene clusters encoding siderophores (iutA/iucABCD) and polysaccharide virulence genes (rmpA2), which often confer a hypervirulent phenotype in K. pneumoniae.25 This co-occurrence of a CZA-resistant KPC variant with hypervirulence markers in a clinical isolate is of particular concern, as it may lead to infections that are both difficult to treat and highly pathogenic.
We report KPC-261 as a newly blaKPC variant responsible for CZA resistance. Genetic and functional evidence support its direct role in conferring this phenotype. Our analysis highlights conserved tandem insertion-duplication patterns within structural domains as a key resistance mechanism. These findings reveal diagnostic targets and reinforce the need to monitor structural evolution of blaKPC variants to inform therapeutic strategies against resistant infections.
Limitations of the study
This single-center, single-isolate study requires further validation for generalizability; additional research is needed on in vivo evolution and fitness cost; molecular docking results need experimental confirmation; and the variant was not tested against other new β-lactamase inhibitor combinations.
Resource availability
Lead contact
Further information or requests can be directed to the lead contact, Hao Xu (xuhao0523@zju.edu.cn).
Materials availability
This study did not generate new unique reagents. There are restrictions to the availability of the K. pneumoniae clinical isolate L3859 used in this study because it was stored in the hospital system that restricts distribution of the bacteria, but we can guide you to the proper contact.
Data and code availability
-
•
Sequences mentioned in the present study were submitted to the GenBank nucleotide database with BioProject accession numbers: PRJNA390758. In addition, the blaKPC-261 gene was deposited in the NCBI database under accession no. PV107385.1.
-
•
This paper does not report original code.
-
•
This paper does not report any other items.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (grant number LQ24H260001) and Medical Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province (grant number 2023KY721).
Author contributions
Y.L. and S.S., writing original draft and formal analysis; R.L., K.W., and L.G., visualization and data curation; T.S. and H.X., writing review and editing, resources, and conceptualization.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
STAR★Methods
Key resources table
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Bacterial and virus strains | ||
| Klebsiella pneumoniae L3859 | This study | L3859 |
| ATCC 25922 | Laboratory stock | ATCC 25922 |
| Salmonella Braenderup serotype strain (H9812) | Laboratory stock | H9812 |
| Escherichia coli Stbl2 | Laboratory stock | Stbl2 |
| Escherichia coli BL21 | Laboratory stock | BL21 |
| Escherichia coli β2155 | Laboratory stock | β2155 |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae L3859/ΔblaKPC | This study | L3859/ΔblaKPC |
| Escherichia coli Stbl2/pHSG398 | This study | Stbl2/pHSG398 |
| Escherichia coli Stbl2/pHSG398:blaKPC-261_p- | This study | Stbl2/pHSG398:blaKPC-261_p- |
| Escherichia coli Stbl2/pHSG398:blaKPC-261_p+ | This study | Stbl2/pHSG398:blaKPC-261_p+ |
| Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins | ||
| LB Broth | Sangon Biotech | Cat: A507002 |
| LB agar | Sangon Biotech | Cat: A507003 |
| MacConkey agar | OXOID | Cat: CM0115B |
| Deposited data | ||
| Sequence of L3859 | This study | BioProject: PRJNA390758 |
| Sequence of L3859/ΔblaKPC | This study | BioProject: PRJNA390758 |
| Sequence of blaKPC-261 | This study | GenBank: PV107385.1 |
| Software and algorithms | ||
| Unicycler software | Wick et al.26 | Unicycler |
| PlasmidFinder | Carattoli, A. et al.27 | PlasmidFinder |
| Prokka | https://github.com/tseemann/prokka | Prokka |
| BLASTn | https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi | BLASTn |
| Kleborate | https://github.com/klebgenomics/Kleborate | Kleborate |
| ResFinder | https://www.genomicepidemiology.org/services/ | ResFinder |
| BRIG | Alikhan et al.28 | BRIG |
| Swiss-Model | https://swissmodel.expasy.org/ | Swiss-Model |
| AutoDock Vina | Eberhardt et al.29 | AutoDock Vina |
| PyMol | Lill et al.30 | PyMol |
| ADFRsuite | Ravindranath et al.31 | ADFRsuite |
| Clustal Omega | Sievers et al.32 | Clustal Omega |
| Jalview | Waterhouse et al.33 | Jalview |
| R | https://www.r-project.org | R |
| GraphPad Prism | https://www.graphpad-prism.cn | GraphPad Prism |
Experimental model and study participant details
Bacterial strain
Strain L3859 was isolated from the stool sample of a 70-year-old male patient with severe pneumonia and septicemia at the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The strain was identified as Klebsiella pneumoniae by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and was classified as sequence type ST11 and capsular type KL64. L3859 was found to harbor a newly blaKPC variant, blaKPC-261, along with multiple other resistance genes and two virulence gene clusters encoding siderophores and polysaccharide virulence genes. To investigate the resistance mechanism, gene knockout experiments, plasmid construction, growth curve analysis, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) were performed. Whole-genome sequencing was conducted, and plasmid profiles were examined using S1-PFGE, Southern blotting, and bioinformatics tools.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
This study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki and obtained approval from the clinical research ethics committee of The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine [No. 2018–752]. The ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent for the following reasons: the study was retrospective; all patient information was anonymized; and the collection and storage of clinical isolates were part of the hospital diagnostic laboratory’s routine workflow, with no impact on patient health.
Method details
Bacterial isolation and clinical context
Klebsiella pneumoniae strain L3859 was isolated from a stool sample of a 70-year-old male patient undergoing ceftazidime-avibactam therapy at The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. For bacterial isolation, the stool was spread on MacConkey agar plates containing 2 μg/mL cefotaxime, then selected monoclonally and identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/MS).34
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST)
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined via broth microdilution and interpreted according to the CLSI guidelines (2026) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) 2022 criteria. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as a control strain. Antibiotics tested included ceftazidime-avibactam, carbapenems, β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, polymyxins, and others.
Whole genome sequencing and bioinformatics
Genomic DNA was extracted using a commercial DNeasy UltraClean Microbial Kit (Qiagen), followed by sequencing on both Illumina NovaSeq and Oxford Nanopore MinION platforms.35 Reads were assembled using Unicycler v0.4.826 and annotated via Prokka v1.14.5 (https://github.com/tseemann/prokka). Plasmid identification was conducted using PlasmidFinder27 and BLASTn. Kleborate (https://github.com/klebgenomics/Kleborate) was used to conduct multilocus sequence typing (MLST), determine KL capsule type, and identify virulence genes. Antimicrobial resistance genes were examined with Resfinder on the CGE server (https://www.genomicepidemiology.org/services/).
Plasmid profiling and southern blot
BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG v0.95)28 was employed to generate the comparative circular Figures. S1-nuclease pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (S1-PFGE)36 and Southern blotting were performed to estimate plasmid sizes and confirm the location of blaKPC-261, using digoxigenin-labeled probes by Roche DIG-High Prime DNA Labeling and Detection Starter Kit. The Xba-I digested Salmonella Braenderup serotype strain (H9812) was used as the DNA size marker.
Gene cloning and mutant construction
The blaKPC-261 gene was amplified by PCR and ligated into the pHSG398 vector. Constructs with and without native promoters were introduced into E. coli Stbl2 via electroporation. A ΔblaKPC knockout mutant was generated in L3859 using the suicide plasmid pCVD442AX37 and E. coli β2155 donor strain. The suicide plasmid pCVD442AX carrying the blaKPC-261 gene was introduced into E. coli β2155 via electroporation to create the donor strain β2155/pCVD442AX-ΔblaKPC. This strain was conjugated with a Klebsiella recipient, and apramycin-resistant colonies, indicating plasmid integration, were selected and named Kp/pCVD442AX-ΔblaKPC. These colonies were cultured and spread on LB plates with 10% sucrose to select for single-crossover resolution. PCR screening identified clones with the blaKPC gene deleted, resulting in the strain Kp/ΔblaKPC.
Structural modeling and docking simulations
Protein models of KPC-2 (PDB ID: 5JU3) and KPC-261 were generated using Swiss-Model (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/). Docking of avibactam (Pubchem id: 98350) was performed using AutoDock Vina v1.2.0,29 before docking, the receptor protein was prepared using PyMol v2.5.530 by removing water, salts, and small molecules. A grid box was set to cover the entire protein, and both the receptor and small molecules were converted to PDBQT format using ADFRsuite v1.031 for AutoDock Vina docking. The exhaustiveness was set to 32, with other parameters at default. The conformation with the highest docking score was selected as the binding conformation, and interactions were visualized with PyMOL.
Phylogenetic and sequence analysis
All known blaKPC alleles (n = 232) were downloaded from NCBI. Multiple sequence alignments were conducted with Clustal Omega,32 and insertion-duplication variants were annotated relative to the KPC-2 reference. The blaKPC nucleotide and protein sequences were ultimately displayed through Jalview.33
Growth curve assays
Overnight cultures of L3859, ΔblaKPC, and E. coli transformants were inoculated into LB broth and monitored in a microplate reader at OD600 every 5 min for 20 h at 37°C.13 Using R version 4.3.1, growth curves were plotted from OD600 readings, and relative growth rates along with the area under the curve (AUC) were computed.
KPC carbapenemase extraction and evaluation of enzyme kinetics
The blaKPC-2 and blaKPC-261 coding sequences were inserted into the pET-28a vector (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) and introduced into E. coli BL21 (DE3) competent cells for the purpose of protein expression. After purification, the KPC carbapenemases reached a concentration of 1–1.5 mg/mL. The hydrolysis of β-lactam substrates, including ceftazidime (260 nm), imipenem (300 nm), and meropenem (298 nm), was used to determine the steady-state kinetic parameters (Km and kcat). Nonlinear regression was employed to fit the data to the Michaelis–Menten equation, and the IC50 values for avibactam were calculated by assessing the inhibition of ceftazidime hydrolysis, using GraphPad Prism 10 (GraphPad Software, MA, USA), the data were analyzed with a four-parameter variable-slope model for dose-response inhibition.
Quantification and statistical analysis
There are no quantification or statistical analyses to include in this study.
Contributor Information
Ting Sun, Email: 1195037@zju.edu.cn.
Hao Xu, Email: xuhao0523@zju.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Yang P., Chen Y., Jiang S., Shen P., Lu X., Xiao Y. Association between antibiotic consumption and the rate of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from China based on 153 tertiary hospitals data in 2014. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2018;7:137. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0430-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Soriano A., Carmeli Y., Omrani A.S., Moore L.S.P., Tawadrous M., Irani P. Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Serious Gram-Negative Infections with Limited Treatment Options: A Systematic Literature Review. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2021;10:1989–2034. doi: 10.1007/s40121-021-00507-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hu Y., Liu C., Shen Z., Zhou H., Cao J., Chen S., Lv H., Zhou M., Wang Q., Sun L., et al. Prevalence, risk factors and molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in patients from Zhejiang, China, 2008-2018. Emerg. Microb. Infect. 2020;9:1771–1779. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1799721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shen S., Deng X., Guo L., Yang L., Yu H., Hu F., Huang X. Emergence of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae during therapy. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2025;44:2197–2206. doi: 10.1007/s10096-025-05180-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu S.Y., Chou S.H., Chuang C., Juan C.H., Ho Y.C., Ho H.L., Chen L., Lin Y.T. Clinical and Microbiological characteristics of patients with ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae strains. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2025;24:26. doi: 10.1186/s12941-025-00797-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Guo Y., Yao L., Wang J., Zhang Y., Zhuo C., Wang Y., Yang X., Li J., He N., Chen J., et al. Comparison of the in vitro activities and resistance mechanisms against imipenem-relebactam and ceftazidime-avibactam in clinical KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated in China. Infection. 2025;53:1469–1481. doi: 10.1007/s15010-025-02474-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nichols W.W., Bradford P.A., Stone G.G. The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: microbiology from clinical studies, and development of resistance during treatment. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2023;78:871–892. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hobson C.A., Pierrat G., Tenaillon O., Bonacorsi S., Bercot B., Jaouen E., Jacquier H., Birgy A. Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase Variants Resistant to Ceftazidime-Avibactam: an Evolutionary Overview. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2022;66 doi: 10.1128/aac.00447-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Barnes M.D., Winkler M.L., Taracila M.A., Page M.G., Desarbre E., Kreiswirth B.N., Shields R.K., Nguyen M.H., Clancy C., Spellberg B., et al. Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-2 (KPC-2), Substitutions at Ambler Position Asp179, and Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam: Unique Antibiotic-Resistant Phenotypes Emerge from beta-Lactamase Protein Engineering. mBio. 2017;8 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00528-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Winkler M.L., Papp-Wallace K.M., Bonomo R.A. Activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against isogenic strains of Escherichia coli containing KPC and SHV beta-lactamases with single amino acid substitutions in the Omega-loop. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015;70:2279–2286. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Antinori E., Unali I., Bertoncelli A., Mazzariol A. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) producer resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam due to a deletion in the blaKPC3 gene. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020;26:946.e1–946.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shi Q., Shen S., Tang C., Ding L., Guo Y., Yang Y., Wu S., Han R., Yin D., Hu F. Molecular mechanisms responsible KPC-135-mediated resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam in ST11-K47 hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. Emerg. Microb. Infect. 2024;13 doi: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2361007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang X., Xie Y., Zhang Y., Lei T., Zhou L., Yao J., Liu L., Liu H., He J., Yu Y., et al. Evolution of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance driven by mutations in double-copy bla(KPC-2) to bla(KPC-189) during treatment of ST11 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. mSystems. 2024;9 doi: 10.1128/msystems.00722-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Qiao S., Xin S., Zhu Y., Zhao F., Wu H., Zhang J., Yao B., Yu Y., Fu Y., Jiang Y., et al. A large-scale surveillance revealed that KPC variants mediated ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in clinically isolated Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024;12 doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00258-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chen Y., Yang R., Guo P., Liu P., Deng J., Wu Z., Wu Q., Huang J., Liao K. Dynamic evolution of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance due to interchanges between bla(KPC-2) and bla(KPC-145) during treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023;13 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1244511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li X., Zhou L., Huang H. Dynamic evolution of KPC-230-mediated resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam during the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pnenmoniae. Drug Resist. Updat. 2025;79 doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2025.101205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Huang M., Xiao S.P., Zeng Q.H., Guo H.M., Liu Y.T., Wei D.D., Kang X.H. Fitness cost of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance acquisition in carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. BMC Microbiol. 2026;26:104. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-04654-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Myers C.L., Stevenson A., Miller B., Daigle D.M., Uehara T., Pevear D.C. Cefepime-taniborbactam and ceftibuten-ledaborbactam maintain activity against KPC variants that lead to ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2025;69 doi: 10.1128/aac.01511-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hamza M., Traglia G.M.M., Maccari L., Gomez S., Sanz M.B., Akhtar U., Mezcord V., Escalante J., Corso A., Rodriguez C., et al. Emerging Resistance to Novel beta-Lactam beta-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations in Klebsiella pneumoniae bearing KPC Variants. bioRxiv. 2025 doi: 10.1101/2025.04.14.648765. Preprint at. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tang B., Meng T., Tian L., Zhong M., Dai Y., Tian R., Pan T., Sun J., Tan R., Wang X., Qu H. Within-host resistance evolution of ST15 Klebsiella pneumoniae in an ICU immunosuppressed patient under antibiotic pressure of polymyxins, ceftazidime-avibactam, and meropenem. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2025;66 doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2025.107554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hu Y., Yuan L., Xia Z., Wan T., Lv Y., Shen J. Characterization of KPC-176, an S171P variant derived from KPC-2, associated with ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in ST11-KL64 Klebsiella pneumoniae. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2026;67 doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2026.107773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Xu H., Zhang T., Cui X., Guo J., Min P., Wu C., Tang X., Zhou L., Wang L., Li X. Development of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance driven by conversion of bla(KPC-2) to bla(KPC-78) during treatment of ST463 carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2026;67 doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2025.107703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu C., Wu Y., Zhang Y., Yan Z., Gu D., Zhou H., Dong N., Cai C., Chen G., Zhang R. Effectiveness of antimicrobial agent combinations against carbapenem-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae with KPC variants in China. Front. Microbiol. 2025;15 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1519319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tascini C., Marshall S.H., Bonomo R.A., Gaibani P. In vitro activity of cefepime/zidebactam against Klebsiella pneumoniae carrying bla (KPC) variants conferring resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2026;8 doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlag026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Struve C., Roe C.C., Stegger M., Stahlhut S.G., Hansen D.S., Engelthaler D.M., Andersen P.S., Driebe E.M., Keim P., Krogfelt K.A. Mapping the Evolution of Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. mBio. 2015;6 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00630-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wick R.R., Judd L.M., Gorrie C.L., Holt K.E. Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017;13 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Carattoli A., Zankari E., García-Fernández A., Voldby Larsen M., Lund O., Villa L., Møller Aarestrup F., Hasman H. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014;58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Alikhan N.F., Petty N.K., Ben Zakour N.L., Beatson S.A. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genom. 2011;12:402. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Eberhardt J., Santos-Martins D., Tillack A.F., Forli S. AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: New Docking Methods, Expanded Force Field, and Python Bindings. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2021;61:3891–3898. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lill M.A., Danielson M.L. Computer-aided drug design platform using PyMOL. J. Comput. Aided. Mol. Des. 2011;25:13–19. doi: 10.1007/s10822-010-9395-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ravindranath P.A., Forli S., Goodsell D.S., Olson A.J., Sanner M.F. AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2015;11 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sievers F., Higgins D.G. Clustal omega. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2014;48:3.13.11–13.13.16. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0313s48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Waterhouse A.M., Procter J.B., Martin D.M.A., Clamp M., Barton G.J. Jalview Version 2--a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1189–1191. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zheng B., Xu H., Lv T., Guo L., Xiao Y., Huang C., Zhang S., Chen Y., Han H., Shen P., et al. Stool Samples of Acute Diarrhea Inpatients as a Reservoir of ST11 Hypervirulent KPC-2-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. mSystems. 2020;5 doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00498-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang Q., Salman S., Luo Y., Tong X. Coexistence of bla(MIR-1) and bla(NDM-1) resistance genes with a novel ST type in Enterobacter roggenkampii from a stool sample: A genome sequencing study. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2025;40:37–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2024.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Barton B.M., Harding G.P., Zuccarelli A.J. A general method for detecting and sizing large plasmids. Anal. Biochem. 1995;226:235–240. doi: 10.1006/abio.1995.1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Philippe N., Alcaraz J.P., Coursange E., Geiselmann J., Schneider D. Improvement of pCVD442, a suicide plasmid for gene allele exchange in bacteria. Plasmid. 2004;51:246–255. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2004.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
-
•
Sequences mentioned in the present study were submitted to the GenBank nucleotide database with BioProject accession numbers: PRJNA390758. In addition, the blaKPC-261 gene was deposited in the NCBI database under accession no. PV107385.1.
-
•
This paper does not report original code.
-
•
This paper does not report any other items.

