Skip to main content
iScience logoLink to iScience
. 2026 Jun 25;29(7):116603. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.116603

Corrigendum to: “COVID-19 monitoring with sparse sampling of sewered and non-sewered wastewater in urban and rural communities” [iScience, Volume 26, Issue 7 (2023) 107019]

Dhammika Leshan Wannigama 1,2,3,4,5,6,45,∗, Mohan Amarasiri 7,44, Parichart Hongsing 8,9,44, Cameron Hurst 10,11,44, Charin Modchang 12,13,14,∗∗, Sudarat Chadsuthi 15,44, Suparinthon Anupong 12,44, Phatthranit Phattharapornjaroen 16,17,44, Ali Hosseini Rad S M 18,19,44, Stefan Fernandez 20, Angkana T Huang 20, Porames Vatanaprasan 16, Dylan John Jay 6, Thammakorn Saethang 21, Sirirat Luk-in 22, Robin James Storer 23, Puey Ounjai 24, Naveen Kumar Devanga Ragupathi 4,25,26, Phitsanuruk Kanthawee 27, Daisuke Sano 28,29, Takashi Furukawa 7, Kazunari Sei 7, Asada Leelahavanichkul 1,30, Talerngsak Kanjanabuch 31,32,33,34, Nattiya Hirankarn 2,19, Paul G Higgins 35,36, Anthony Kicic 37,38,39,40, Andrew C Singer 41, Tanittha Chatsuwan 2,3,∗∗∗, Sam Trowsdale 42, Shuichi Abe 1,44, Alexander D McLellan 18,∗∗∗∗, Hitoshi Ishikawa 43
PMCID: PMC13320428  PMID: 42389602

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107019

This Corrigendum relates to the above article.

Post-publication, an investigation identified a concern around the authenticity of the following figure panels:

In Supplemental Figure S3, the left-column panels A, D, G, J, and M (SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations in wastewater collected from different facilities in Nakhon Pathom, Nonthaburi, Pathum Thani, Samut Prakan, and Samut Sakhon, respectively) appear to display the same dataset, although they are described as representing five different provinces.

The authors were requested to provide comment on these concerns, as well as the raw data to aid investigation, and have clarified that the duplication of panels A, D, G, J, and M resulted from an error in the plotting code introduced during figure preparation, which caused the same dataset to be displayed in all five panels. The underlying source data for the five provinces are distinct, and the error affected only the rendered figure; it did not affect the data, analyses, results, or conclusions presented in the article. Regarding the right-column panels C, F, I, L, and O, the authors clarified that each panel is plotted from distinct, province-specific data, and that the apparent similarity reflects the genuinely similar relative facility-type compositions across these adjacent provinces in the greater Bangkok metropolitan region. The authors have provided the correct figures as below.

graphic file with name figs3c.jpg

Figure S3. SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations in wastewater collected from different facilities, infection incidences based on SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations, and relative abundance of SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentration in wastewater collected from different facilities. The ribbons show the standard deviation of 1000 bootstrap replicates. Grey areas highlight the period during a nationwide ban on large events to ease lockdown (26-Dec-20 to 29-Jan-21, and 17-Apr-21 to 01-Sep-21). The black labels show the super-spreading events, and the red labels are the starting of interventions. (a-c) Nakhon Pathom, (d-f) Nonthaburi, (g-i) Pathum Thani, (j-l) Samut Prakan, (m-o) Samut Sakhon (Corrected)

The authors apologise for this oversight. The journal apologises that the oversight was not identified prior to publication.

Contributor Information

Dhammika Leshan Wannigama, Email: dhammika.l@chula.ac.th.

Charin Modchang, Email: charin.mod@mahidol.edu.

Tanittha Chatsuwan, Email: tanittha.c@chula.ac.th.

Alexander D. McLellan, Email: alex.mclellan@otago.ac.nz.


Articles from iScience are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES