Abstract
Elevated cytoplasmic [Ca2+] and protein kinase C (PKC) activation are key signalling events driving secretion in pancreatic acinar cells after stimulation by the secretagogues cholecystokinin (CCK) and acetylcholine (ACh). Although both ACh and CCK binding to their cognate receptors activates Gq/11 proteins, leading to inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3)-mediated Ca2+ release and diacylglycerol (DAG)-dependent PKC activation, it has been proposed that physiological CCK stimulation bypasses this canonical pathway, instead mobilizing Ca2+ via production of nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAADP). We reassessed the role of Gq/11 signalling in CCK-induced responses using a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) assay, demonstrating that both CCK1 (CCK1R) and muscarinic M3 receptors (M3R) engage Gq/11 along with other Gα subunits. Importantly YM-254890, a Gq/11 antagonist, inhibited coupling through Gq/11 but did not alter the interactions of CCK1R or M3R with other G protein families. YM-254890 eliminated CCK1R- and M3R-induced Ca2+ signals in isolated acinar cells. Consistent with the in vitro data, systemic CCK injection, intrinsic neural stimulation or feeding failed to elicit Ca2+ responses in vivo in mice pre-treated with YM-254890, indicating that physiological stimulation of Ca2+ signalling events requires Gq/11 activation. Additionally YM-254890 suppressed Ca2+-activated Cl− currents, a key event underlying fluid secretion, and amylase secretion in acini after CCK or ACh stimulation. These findings establish that CCK- and ACh-induced exocrine pancreatic secretion strictly requires Gq/11 activation, leading to IP3 generation, DAG production and downstream signalling that is essential for physiological function.
Keywords: Ca2+ signalling; diacylglycerol; exocytosis; Gαq/11; inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate; nicotinic acid dinucleotide adenine phosphate; pancreatic acinar cells; YM-254890
Graphical Abstract

Gq/11 activation is required for signalling and function after stimulation of pancreatic acinar cells with ACh and CCK. A, A conventional model of signalling through M3R and CCK1R in pancreatic acinar cells. ACh couples through Gq/11 to result in IP3 and DAG) formation, which results in an elevation in [Ca2+] leading to fluid and protein secretion. CCK is reported to bypass this pathway but couples to the formation of NAADP, resulting in an elevation in Ca2+ and fluid and protein secretion. B, Using a BRET assay the coupling of CCK1R and M3R to G protein α subunits is defined together with the exquisite specificity of the Gq/11 blocker YM-254890. C, YM-254890 blocks Ca2+ signalling and function by both CCK and ACh, indicating that IP3 (and DAG) generation is required after stimulation by both secretagogues. D, New model incorporating the requirement for Gq/11 signalling and function after stimulation of pancreatic acinar cells.
Introduction
The primary function of the exocrine pancreas is to produce pancreatic juice which initiates the digestion of macronutrients after feeding (Williams, 1993, 2001). Secretagogue-stimulated intracellular Ca2+ signals play fundamental roles in activating downstream effectors important for both the exocytosis of vesicles containing digestive enzymes and the secretion of fluid from pancreatic acinar cells. During the cephalic phase of gastrointestinal (GI) activity, acinar cells initially secrete in response to ACh released by parasympathetic vagal neural input. Subsequently during the intestinal phase, partially digested macronutrients stimulate endocrine I cells in the duodenum to secrete the peptide hormone CCK, which enters the circulation and then acts directly on acinar cells (Liddle, 1995).
The targets of ACh and CCK are M3R and CCK1R also known as CCKAR receptors, respectively (Dehaye et al., 1984; Jensen et al., 1980; Sankaran et al., 1980; Schmid et al., 1998). Both receptors are G protein coupled and act through heterotrimeric G protein α subunits, predominately the Gq/11 family (Matozaki et al., 1988; Yule et al., 1999), but signalling through other G protein α subunits has been reported (Schnefel et al., 1990; Yule et al., 1993). Gq/11 activation leads to the production of IP3, and DAG after phospholipase C activation. As first demonstrated in pancreatic acinar cells (Streb et al., 1983), IP3 results in Ca2+ release via IP3 receptors (IP3R) resident in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Lee et al., 1997; Yule et al., 1997), whereas DAG stimulates PKC. Both an elevation in [Ca2+] and an increase in PKC activity are necessary to trigger exocytosis, with synergism between the two limbs of the pathway mediating digestive enzyme secretion (Williams, 2001). However an elevation in [Ca2+] is largely sufficient to activate the ion channels necessary for ion and fluid transport from the acinar cell (Petersen & Findlay, 1987). Consistent with the central role of this pathway for pancreatic exocrine physiology, secretagogue-stimulated Ca2+ signals and secretion are absent in transgenic animals engineered to lack IP3R type 2/3 (Futatsugi et al., 2005; Giovannucci et al., 2002; Kidd & Thorn, 2000).
Although the canonical Gq/11-IP3 signalling pathway is activated after M3R and CCK1R stimulation, the notion that inositol IP3serves as the only second messenger driving all secretagogue-mediated Ca2+ signals has been challenged (Petersen, 2023). Early studies demonstrated that although both CCK and ACh stimulation led to IP3 formation, downstream Ca2+ signals and amylase secretion were detectable at significantly lower secretagogue concentrations (Matozaki & Williams, 1989, 1992; Matozaki et al., 1990; Powers, Johnson et al., 1985; Powers, Saluja et al., 1985). Although this discrepancy may be attributed to the limited sensitivity of IP3 assays and the substantial amplification within the signalling cascade, subsequent reports have revealed that ACh and CCK evoke distinct subcellular spatiotemporal Ca2+ signalling ‘signatures’ (Cancela et al., 2000, 2002; Menteyne et al., 2006; Osipchuk et al., 1990; Shin et al., 2001; Takano & Yule, 2023, 2024; Yamasaki et al., 2004; Yule et al., 1991). These findings suggest that secretagogue-induced signalling is not identical and may involve additional Ca2+-releasing messengers.
Supporting this hypothesis pancreatic acinar cells were the first native mammalian cells in which NAADP was identified as a potent mediator of Ca2+ release. This messenger activates two-pore channel (TPC) family members localized to endolysosomal acidic organelles (Calcraft et al., 2009). Notably NAADP is produced in response to physiological CCK stimulation but is apparently not produced after muscarinic receptor activation by ACh (Yamasaki et al., 2005). Consistent with these data the NAADP antagonist trans-NED-19 has been shown to eliminate Ca2+ responses to low CCK concentrations while leaving muscarinic receptor-mediated signalling intact (Gerasimenko et al., 2015; Tsvilovskyy et al., 2024). In addition the effects of NAADP are reduced in isolated permeabilized acini prepared from TPC2 null mice (Gerasimenko et al., 2015). Although the precise biochemical pathway responsible for NAADP synthesis in pancreatic acinar cells remains undefined, studies in other cell types indicate that NAADP production is likely not directly linked to Gq/11 activation (Gu et al., 2021). In sum these findings have been interpreted to indicate that IP3 production does not occur in response to physiological CCK concentrations and is not essential for initiating Ca2+ signalling events and therefore physiological function (Cancela, 2001; Menteyne et al., 2006).
As a further complexity, paradoxically, inhibitors of IP3R and ryanodine receptors (RyRs) have been reported to eliminate NAADP-induced Ca2+ signals (Cancela et al., 2000). To reconcile these data a model has been developed that posits that at physiological concentrations, CCK-stimulated NAADP formation occurs in the absence of elevated levels of IP3, resulting in limited local Ca2+ release. This event provides an initial trigger, which through Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR) recruits further activity through neighbouring IP3R and RyR (Roderick & Bootman, 2003; Roderick et al., 2003). Because IP3R activity has an absolute requirement for IP3 binding (Alzayady et al., 2016; Foskett et al., 2007), this suggests that the local Ca2+ release triggered by NAADP sensitizes IP3R to open at ambient levels of IP3 without the necessity of CCK-induced formation of IP3. In contrast, ACh stimulation simply results in the formation of IP3, triggering Ca2+ release and CICR amplification through IP3R and RyR (Cancela et al., 2002; Petersen, 2023). Recently it has been reported that fundamental Ca2+ release events mediated by TPC2 channels – termed ‘Ca2+ tuffs’ – do not activate IP3Rs under basal conditions. However they enhance IP3R activity when intracellular IP3 levels are elevated. These findings suggest that, at least in this cell culture model, TPC2-induced Ca2+ release does not sensitize IP3R to respond to increasing [Ca2+] at ambient, non-stimulated levels of IP3 (Yuan et al., 2024).
As noted, although there is evidence that NAADP can release Ca2+ in response to CCK stimulation, the absence of a requirement for Gq/11-linked IP3 production is difficult to reconcile with both receptors clearly coupling to Gq/11 and particularly the requirement for DAG formation and PKC activation for stimulated vesicle exocytosis. Therefore in this study we reinvestigated the role of Gq/11 signalling in response to CCK1R and M3R stimulation. Initially in a heterologous expression system, we show that CCK1R couples to Gαq together with a wide variety of Gα subunit families, whereas M3R is less promiscuous and activates predominately Gαq family members. We further demonstrate that an inhibitor of Gq/11, YM-254890 (Schnefel et al., 1990; Schrage et al., 2015; Voss, 2023), specifically inhibits coupling between both M3R and CCK1R and Gq/11 without altering signalling through other Gα protein families. In pancreatic acinar cells YM-254890 eliminated Ca2+ signals in vitro in response to both CCK and muscarinic receptor stimulation over a wide range of concentrations representing threshold through physiological stimulation and in vivo in response to nervous stimulation, CCK administration and feeding. Finally activation of both Ca2+-activated Cl− currents, pivotal to fluid secretion and amylase secretion, was completely inhibited by YM-254890. These data are consistent with both CCK and ACh signalling through Gq/11 to increase IP3 and DAG, and further this event is necessary to evoke physiological fluid and enzyme secretion from pancreatic acinar cells.
Results
Coupling of both M3R and CCK1R to Gq
We applied a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET)-based assay (G protein nanoBRET) to investigate the proximal events after M3R and CCK1R activation. The assay relies on the generation of a BRET signal between Venus-Gβ1γ 2 and masGRK3CT-Nluc, which occurs after cell surface receptor activation-induced dissociation of heterotrimeric G protein complexes (Fig. 1A). First in HEK293 cells expressing either M3R or CCK1R, we determined the concentration–response relationships for M3R and CCK1R coupling through Gq in live cells, as described previously (Alabdali et al., 2023). Consistent with the existing literature our in vitro findings indicated activation of the heterotrimeric Gq protein in response to M3R stimulation by Carbachol (CCh) (pEC50 = 6.83) (Fig. 1B). Similarly treatment with CCK demonstrated activation of the heterotrimeric Gq protein (pEC50 = 9.19) (Fig. 1C).
Figure 1. Concentration–response curves for M3R (muscarinic M3 receptor) and CCKR1.

A, Schematics of the G protein nanoBRET assay applied to measure specific Gα protein coupling profiles. Upon agonist interaction with the receptor and G protein dissociation, the Gβγ heterodimer fused with acceptor Venus interacts with GRK3ct fused with donor NanoLuc generating a BRET (bioluminescence resonance energy transfer) signal. B, Concentration–response curve for Gq activation by M3R in response to CCh. C, CCKR1 activation of Gαq with application of increasing concentration of CCK. Data are expressed as mean ΔBRET ratio ± SD. N = 3, non-linear regression fit four parameters.
YM-254890 selectively attenuates coupling through Gq
The macrocyclic depsipeptide, YM-254890, has been reported to inhibit cellular responses through Gq-coupled receptors by acting as a guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor, preventing the separation of Gq heterotrimers and thus activation of downstream effectors (Schnefel et al., 1990; Schrage et al., 2015; Voss, 2023). To test the ability of YM-254890 to inhibit Gq signalling through M3R and CCK1R, we next determined the concentration–inhibition relationships for saturating concentrations of CCh and CCK in presence of YM-254890. In cells expressing M3R YM-254890 dose dependently inhibited CCh-induced coupling to Gq (pIC50 = 5.15; Fig. 2A). Similarly YM-254890 dose dependently inhibited CCK1R response to CCK with a similar IC50 (pIC50 = 5.38; Fig. 2B). As initial evidence that YM-254890 specifically inhibits Gq-coupled events, we probed the effect of YM-254890 on the inhibition of four G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) primarily coupled to each of the four G protein sub-families. Agonist-induced activation of Gs-coupled dopamine D1 receptor (D1R), Gi/o-coupled dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) and G12/13-coupled lysophosphatidic acid receptor 2 (LPA2R) were not impacted by treatments with YM-254890 (Fig. 2C). However activation of Gq-coupled serotonin 2A receptor (5-HT2AR) was completely eliminated by treatment with 25 μMYM-254890 (Fig. 2C).
Figure 2. Gα protein inhibitory profile of YM-254890.

A and B, Concentration–response curves for YM-254890 on Gq activation by M3R and CCKR1 in response to application of 100 μM CCh and 1 μM CCK, respectively, measured via G protein NanoBRET assay. The pIC50 value of YM-254890 was similar between the two receptors (pIC50 = 5.15 for M3R, pIC50 = 5.38 for CCKR1). N = 3, non-linear regression fit four parameters. C, Inhibitory effect of 25 μM YM-254890 on activation of Gs by dopamine D1 receptor (D1R), GoA by dopamine 2 receptor (D2R), G13 by lysophosphatidic acid receptor 2 (LPA2R) and Gq by serotonin 2A receptor (5-HT2AR). **P < 0.01. N = 3, paired t test. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
Conceivably Ca2+ signals and activation of physiological responses after M3R or CCK1R stimulation could result from activating other G protein family members. Therefore we next investigated whether M3R and CCK1R can activate other G proteins by studying BRET between 12 Gα proteins, covering the 4 G protein families. Experiments were performed at saturating concentrations of the muscarinic agonist carbachol (CCh, 100 μM) and CCK (1 μM). M3R activation resulted in the dissociation of seven G protein heterotrimers across three families (Gq/11, Gi/o and G12/13), with Gq, G11 and G15 coupling prominently (Fig. 3A). As previously reported CCK1R exhibited a high level of promiscuity as it stimulated the dissociation of each of the 12 Gα proteins tested (Fig. 3B). To further establish the selectivity of YM-254890 to inhibit Gq coupling between M3R and CCK1R, we examined the extent of signal inhibition by YM-254890 for each Gα protein activated by the two GPCRs. We observed that YM-254890 effectively inhibited receptor-induced G protein dissociation for Gq and G11 in response to agonist stimulation of either M3R (Fig. 4A) or CCK1R (Fig. 4B). Activation of the other members of the Gq family, namely G14 and G15, was only partially or not significantly affected by treatments with YM-254890 (Fig. 4A,B). In sum these data indicate that M3R and CCKR1 can couple to Gq and a variety of other heterotrimeric G protein families and that YM-254890 is an exquisitely selective inhibitor of Gq/11 signalling.
Figure 3. Gα protein fingerprint of M3R (muscarinic M3 receptor) and CCKR1.

A and B, M3R and CCKR1 Gα protein activation profile upon agonist application (100 μM CCh and 1 μM CCK (cholecystokinin), respectively) measured by G protein NanoBRET assay. Twelve different Gα proteins from the 4 subfamilies were tested: Gs, GoA, Gi1,Gi2, Gi3, Gz, Gq, G11, G14, G15, G12 and G13. An average ΔBRET ratio >0.01 was considered a positive Gα protein activation. N = 3. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
Figure 4. YM-254890 prevents activation of Gq/11 family members downstream M3R (muscarinic M3 receptor) and CCKR1 signalling.

A and B, G protein NanoBret assay testing inhibitory effect of YM-254890 (25 μM) or vehicle pre-treatment on Gα proteins downstream of M3R and CCKR1 signalling. M3R and CCKR1 were activated by the application of 100 μM CCh and 1 μM CCK, respectively. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. N = 3; **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001, paired t test.
Inhibition of Gq/11 by YM-254890 eliminates Ca2+ signals in pancreatic acinar cells in vitro
Having established the specificity of YM-254890 to inhibit Gq/11-mediated events, we next investigated the effects of YM-254890 on secretagogue-stimulated Ca2+ signals in acutely isolated pancreatic acini. In fura-2 AM loaded pancreatic acini, we utilized a protocol in which cells were treated twice with an identical concentration of CCh and then subsequently exposed to CCK (Fig. 5A). Essentially identical responses could be evoked to CCh at maximal concentrations that evoke a ‘peak and plateau’-type response (Fig. 5A) or at threshold concentrations that result in Ca2+ oscillations (Fig. 5D). After the removal of [CCh] acinar cells also responded robustly to maximal or threshold concentrations of CCK (Fig. 5A,D). In contrast exposure of cells to YM-264890 completely eliminated the initial CCh-induced increase (Fig. 5B,E), and the cells were then refractory to further stimulation by either CCh or CCK, both at maximal (Fig. 5B and pooled data Fig. 5C) and threshold (Fig. 5E and pooled data Fig. 5F) concentrations of secretagogues.
Figure 5. YM-254890 prevents agonist-induced intracellular calcium release in isolated pancreatic acinar cells.

A, Representative normalized fura-2 fluorescence traces from individual acinar cells in control and in presence of 1 μM CCh or 10 pM CCK. B, Representative traces from individual cells before and after the addition of 1 μM YM-254890. C, Scatter plots of normalized fluorescence imaging data evoked by high concentrations of agonist in presence or absence of 1 μM YM-254890. Maximum normalized fluorescence values were measured and plotted for each condition listed (n = 3 mice, 5–10 cells per mouse). Black symbols represent cells that were exposed only to the indicated agonists. Red symbols represent cells that were initially stimulated by CCh and then subsequently were bathed in YM-254890 for further stimulations by CCh and then CCK. Populations were compared between normalized fluorescence values for agonist in presence and absence of YM-254890. P-values were obtained using a heteroscedastic t test. D, Representative normalized fura-2 fluorescence traces from individual acinar cells in control and in presence of 10 nM CCh or 300 fM CCK. E, Representative traces from individual cells before and after the addition of 1 mM YM-254890. F, Scatter plots of grouped fluorescence imaging data evoked by low concentrations of agonist in presence or absence of 1 μM YM-254890. Black symbols represent cells that were exposed only to agonist. Red symbols represent cells that were initially stimulated by CCh and then subsequently were bathed in YM-254890 for further stimulation by CCh and then CCK. Maximum normalized fluorescence values were measured for each condition listed (n = 3 mice, 5–10 cells per mouse). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Populations were compared between normalized fluorescence values for agonist in presence and absence of YM-254890. P-values were obtained using a heteroscedastic t test. ****P < 0.0001. YM-254890 completely blocked the ability of individual acinar cells to release intracellular calcium irrespective of whether cells were stimulated with low or high concentrations of CCh or CCK.
Inhibition of Gq/11 by YM-254890 eliminates Ca2+ signals in pancreatic acinar cells in vivo
We have previously developed a platform to study Ca2+ signalling events in pancreatic acinar cells in vivo after physiological stimulation in a native setting. Briefly mice that express a genetically encoded Ca2+ indicator GCaMP6F, specifically in exocrine acinar cells, were produced, allowing the visualization of Ca2+ signals using multiphoton microscopy in live mice (Huang et al., 2024; Takano & Yule, 2022, 2023, 2024; Takano et al., 2021; Wahl et al., 2023). We investigated the effects of inhibiting Gq/11 on Ca2+ responses evoked by nervous stimulation and CCK administration to simulate physiological stimulation during the cephalic and intestinal phases of GI activity, respectively. A protocol was utilized whereby images of pancreatic acinar cells were obtained after stimulation of the intrinsic nerves to the pancreas and subsequently after injection of CCK before and after incubation of the exposed gland to YM-254890 (Fig. 6A). In the absence of exogenous stimulation small, low-frequency Ca2+ signals were observed (Fig. 6B, average projection images visualizing changes in the fluorescence signal during the period of imaging; Fig. 6C, kinetic plots for regions of interest (ROI) within the field of view; and Fig. 6D, pooled data summarizing cells responding, maximum change in amplitude and oscillation frequency). We have reported previously that these signals result from residual circulating CCK even in the fasted state (Takano & Yule, 2023). Subsequent stimulation of intrinsic nerves innervating the pancreas resulted in robust Ca2+ signals in a large proportion of the field of view (Fig. 6B, average projection image; Fig. 6C, kinetic plots; Fig. 6E, pooled data). Our previous data confirm that these signals are the result of ACh release from parasympathetic neurons as they are completely attenuated by exposure of the gland to atropine (Takano & Yule, 2023). After the nervous stimulation was terminated, the mice were then injected i.p. with 1 μg/kg of CCK, a concentration deemed physiological because it evokes Ca2+ signals with similar spatial and temporal characteristics observed in response to feeding (Takano & Yule, 2023). CCK stimulation again resulted in large Ca2+ signals in a significant portion of the acinar cells in the imaging field of view (Fig. 6B, average projection image; Fig. 6C, kinetic plots; and Fig. 6D, pooled data). The exposed gland was then bathed in a solution containing 10 μM YM-264890, and imaging was performed in the continued presence of CCK and subsequently after nervous stimulation. Strikingly Ca2+ signals were completely eliminated in response to either stimulus, indicating both ACh- and CCK-stimulated Ca2+ elevations result from Gq activation (Fig. 6B, average projection image; Fig. 6C, kinetic plot; Fig. 6D,E, and pooled data).
Figure 6. Nerve stimulation and CCK (cholecystokinin)-induced pancreatic acinar Ca2+ signalling require Gq activation in vivo.

A, A schematic of the experimental design. Images were taken as a pair with and without nerve stimulation during imaging. First imaging set (a, b) serves as baseline responses in fasting animals. Second set (c, d) shows CCK-induced responses. Third set (e, f) shows the effect of YM-254890. B, Representative average projection images of acinar cell Ca2+ activity during the period of stimulation in each condition indicated as in a–f. Scale bar: 10 μm. C, Representative kinetic plots of Ca2+ signals in acinar cells shown in aforementioned images. D, Summary histograms of percentage of acinar cells that exhibited Ca2+ signalling, the amplitude of Ca2+ transient and the frequencies of Ca2+ events at baseline (a), after CCK exposure (c) and after YM-254890 application (e). N = 4 animals, **P < 0.01, ANOVA with Tukey’s test. E, Summary histograms of acinar Ca2+ signalling during nerve stimulation at baseline (b), after CCK induction (d) and after YM-254890 application (f). N = 3–4 animals, **P < 0.01, ANOVA with Tukey’s test. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
Experiments were also performed in animals that were fasted overnight and then subsequently fed by gavage 1 h prior to imaging (Fig. 7A). As we have previously reported (Takano & Yule, 2023, 2024), feeding resulted in robust oscillatory Ca2+ signals mediated by circulating CCK (Fig. 7B, average projection image; Fig. 7C, kinetic plots; and Fig. 7D, pooled data). Feeding-induced, together with nerve-induced, elevations in [Ca2+] were eliminated by exposure of the gland to 10 μM YM-264890 (Fig. 7B, average projection image; Fig. 7C, kinetic plots; and Fig. 7D,E, pooled data).
Figure 7. Feeding-induced Ca2+ signalling requires Gq activation in vivo.

A, A schematic of the experimental design. Images were taken as a pair with and without nerve stimulation during imaging. First imaging set (a, b) serves as baseline responses in animals that were fed before imaging. Second set (c, d) shows the effect of YM-254890. B, Representative average image projections of acinar cell Ca2+ signals in each condition during the period of imaging, indicated as in a–d. Scale bar: 10 μm. C, Representative kinetic plots of acinar cell Ca2+ signals shown in the aforementioned images. D, Summary histograms of percentage of acinar cells that exhibited Ca2+ signalling, amplitude of Ca2+ transient and frequencies of Ca2+ events at baseline (a) and after YM-254890 application (c). **P < 0.01, N = 4 animals, paired t test. E, Summary histograms of acinar Ca2+ signalling during nerve stimulation at baseline (b) and after YM-254890 application (d). N = 4 animals, *P < 0.05, paired t test. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
ACh and CCK stimulation of fluid secretion and exocytosis requires Gq activation
To confirm that Ca2+ signals required for the stimulation of fluid secretion and exocytosis are dependent on Gq activation, we performed a series of experiments to assess the effect of YM-254890 on secretagogue-stimulated enzyme secretion and ion channel activation. Ca2+-dependent activation of a Cl− channel, likely TMEM16a, which is localized on the apical plasma membrane (PM) of acinar cells, is essential for fluid secretion from acinar cells (Giovannucci et al., 2002; Park et al., 2001; Petersen, 1992). Ca2+-activated Cl− currents were monitored in acutely isolated pancreatic acinar cells by whole-cell patch clamp where the Ca2+ in the internal pipette solution was weakly buffered with N-(2-hydroxyethyl) ethylenediamine-N,N’,N’-triacetic acid (HEDTA) at 100 nM to allow changes in Ca2+ from an appropriate basal value after secretagogue stimulation. Cl− currents were monitored after voltage excursions from a holding potential of −50 mV to more positive potentials. Acinar cells were exposed twice to CCh and then stimulated with CCK. Stimulation resulted in robust Cl currents, which were maintained throughout the period of secretagogue exposure (Fig. 8A, circles, and Fig. 8B,D). Next patch-clamped acinar cells were first treated with CCh to confirm the viability of the cell and then exposed to YM-264890. YM-264890 completely eliminated the activation of Cl− currents after restimulation with either CCh or CCK (Fig. 8A, squares, and Fig. 8C,D).
Figure 8. YM-254890 attenuates whole-cell macroscopic calcium-dependent TMEM16A Cl– currents induced by CCh and CCK (cholecystokinin).

A, Time course of average Cl− current densities evoked by an initial CCh treatment to establish current magnitudes, followed by a second stimulation by CCh and subsequent CCK application, with and without the addition of 1 μM YM-254890. Black circles represent current densities without YM-254890. Black squares represent current densities before the addition of 1 μM YM-254890, whereas red squares represent current densities in presence of YM-254890 and the indicated agonist. B, Representative Cl− current traces evoked by 1 μM CCh and subsequent 10 pM CCK stimulations when cells were held at −50 mV and stepped from −80 to 120 mV in 20 mV increments (inset shows voltage stepping protocol). C, Representative Cl− current traces before and after the addition of YM-254890 in presence of the agonists indicated. D, Grouped current–voltage relationships elicited by agonists in presence and absence of 1 μM YM-254890 (n = 3 mice, 3 cells per mouse). Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Black symbols represent current densities without YM-254890 evoked by either CCh or CCK. Red solid squares represent current densities before the addition of 1 μM YM-254890, whereas red open symbols represent current densities in presence of YM-254890 and the indicated agonist. TMEM16A currents were completely absent in presence of 1 μM YM-254890 irrespective of whether stimulated by CCh or CCK.
Finally we assessed the Gq/11 dependency of secretagogue-stimulated exocytosis by monitoring the secretion of α-amylase, the enzyme responsible for the initial digestion of carbohydrates. Aliquots of acutely isolated mouse pancreatic acinar cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of either CCh or CCK, and secreted α-amylase was assayed in the bathing medium (Williams et al., 1978). Both CCh and CCK incubation resulted in a characteristic biphasic concentration–secretion relationship. Notably exocytosis of amylase was completely inhibited by YM-264890 at all concentrations of both CCh and CCK (Fig. 9A,B). Moreover amylase activity in all samples treated with YM-264890 and secretagogues was not significantly different from basal secretion measured in the absence of secretagogues (one-way ANOVA, P = 0.144 (Fig. 9A); P = 0.96 (Fig. 9B)). In sum these data demonstrate that M3R and CCK1R couple to Gq/11 to increase in [Ca2+], likely as a result of IP3 formation, and that is required for the physiological function of pancreatic acinar cells.
Figure 9. YM-254890 inhibits stimulated amylase secretion in isolated acinar cells.

Isolated mouse acini were pre-treated with DMSO or 1 μM YM-254890 for 10 min and then stimulated with A, CCK or B, CCh at the indicated concentrations for 30 min. Amylase release into the medium is expressed as a percentage of total cellular amylase. N = 3, data are mean ± SD. ****P < 0.0001 and ***P < 0.001, non-paired t test. # indicates that basal secretion was not significantly different from ± secretagogue + YM 254890 one-way ANOVA, P = 0.144 (CCK (cholecystokinin) + YM vs. control); P = 0.962 (CCh + YM vs. control).
Discussion
Pancreatic acinar cells secrete fluid and enzymes essential for macronutrient digestion after feeding. Extensive research has established that Ca2+ signalling plays a crucial role in stimulus–secretion coupling in exocrine acinar cells. Stimulation by the primary secretagogues, ACh and CCK, elicits increases in intracellular [Ca2+] with distinct spatial and temporal characteristics that are necessary for physiological fluid and protein secretion (Matozaki et al., 1990; Takano & Yule, 2023). Early studies demonstrated that both secretagogues promote the production of IP3 and DAG through phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) hydrolysis, downstream of canonical Gq signalling pathway (Matozaki & Williams, 1989; Matozaki et al., 1990; Yule et al., 1999). This classical bifurcating pathway subsequently leads to Ca2+ release and PKC activation. Consistent with this mechanism Ca2+ has been shown to be essential for fluid secretion, whereas the elevation of Ca2+ and PKC activity plays a well-established role in the exocytosis of secretory granules containing zymogens and digestive enzymes. Nevertheless there is evidence that NAADP exclusively produced after CCK stimulation acting on TPC2 (Yamasaki et al., 2004, 2005) provides the only agonist-stimulated signal which satisfies the Ca2+-elevating requirement for the action of CCK in acinar cells (Petersen, 2023; Tsvilovskyy et al., 2024). In this mechanistic framework CCK stimulation does not necessitate an obligatory increase in [IP3], and any PKC activation must therefore either involve an atypical PKC isoform or be mediated by DAG produced through pathways independent of PIP2 hydrolysis. Although atypical PKCs are expressed in acinar cells (Satoh et al., 2004), the exocytosis of secretory vesicles is induced by phorbol ester exposure, which does not activate atypical PKCs, and in addition DAG is produced after hydrolysis of PIP2 in response to CCK stimulation (Matozaki & Williams, 1989). Due to the apparent discrepancies in the existing literature, the present study re-evaluated the requirement for increased Gq activity and the consequent increase in [IP3] and [DAG] in the regulation of pancreatic exocrine signalling and function.
CCK1R and M3R are classical class A ‘rhodopsin-like’ G protein-coupled receptors which have been shown to couple to a variety of G protein classes in addition to Gq. Using a BRET assay in a heterologous expression system, we initially obtained a fingerprint of the G protein family members engaged after receptor activation. Subsequently the specificity of a widely used Gq antagonist YM-254890 to inhibit coupling through this pathway was assessed with a goal of subsequently using the inhibitor to probe Gq involvement in pancreatic signalling and function. This assay of membrane-proximal signalling established that CCK1R and M3R activate a variety of G proteins but importantly that YM-254890 is exquisitely selective at antagonizing only the coupling to Gq/11 after stimulation of either receptor, indicating this agent is a powerful, specific tool to investigate the role of Gq/11 in native cells.
As anticipated in isolated acinar cells, the Gq/11 antagonist completely eliminated Ca2+ signalling after activation of the M3R across a range of [CCh] representing threshold to maximal stimulation in vitro. These data support the notion that activation of Gq/11 is both necessary and sufficient for Ca2+ signalling events stimulated by ACh. The prevailing model posits that at physiological [CCK], Ca2+ signalling is independent of an increase in [IP3]. However both Ca2+ oscillations induced by threshold [CCK] and responses to maximal [CCK] were similarly eliminated by YM-254890. These findings demonstrate that M3R- and CCK1R-mediated signalling requires Gq/11 activation at all concentrations of secretagogue and strongly suggest that an increase in [IP3] is necessary for eliciting Ca2+ signals through both receptors. Because CCK1R stimulation activates a broad array of G proteins, it is tempting to speculate that additional signals may function to define the specific characteristics of the CCK-stimulated Ca2+ signal, in addition to activating downstream effectors important for pancreatic physiology (Giovannucci et al., 2000; LeBeau et al., 1999; Yule et al., 1991).
It could be argued that Ca2+ signalling events measured in isolated cells may not fully recapitulate physiological function and processes in vivo (Takano & Yule, 2023, 2024). To further substantiate the critical role of Gq/11 signalling, we conducted intravital imaging in live mice, employing stimuli that mimic intrinsic exocrine pancreatic activation across different phases of digestion. Consistent with the in vitro findings, pancreatic exposure to YM-254890 completely eliminated Ca2+ signalling events induced by endogenous neural input, systemic CCK administration and, importantly, postprandial stimulation. This latter observation unequivocally establishes that physiological levels of CCK stimulated by feeding require Gq/11 activation to generate Ca2+ signals in pancreatic acinar cells. To definitively establish the necessity of Gq/11 activation in physiological pancreatic function, we examined the impact of YM-254890 on secretagogue-induced activation of Ca2+-activated Cl− channels (Kidd & Thorn, 2000), serving as a proxy for fluid secretion, and on amylase release as an indicator of exocytosis. Our findings demonstrate that the complete abrogation of both physiological responses upon Gq/11 inhibition underscores its essential role in exocrine pancreatic secretion. Specifically Gq/11 activation downstream of CCK1R and M3R stimulation, leading to elevated IP3 and DAG levels, is indispensable for both fluid and protein secretion.
Taken together the simplest interpretation of our data is that activation of Gq/11 is necessary and sufficient for signalling and function through both CCK1R and M3R. Nevertheless our data do not strictly exclude a contributory role for NAADP in modulating signalling induced by CCK. For example it is formally possible that production of NAADP is downstream of Gq/11 activation. Moreover given the substantial data which suggests the involvement of NAADP in signals generated through CCK1R, it remains likely that NAADP plays a role in shaping the IP3-induced signals. Our findings align with a model in which physiological stimulation of M3R and CCK1R leads to Gq/11 activation, subsequent production of IP3 and DAG and Ca2+ release via IP3Rs, accompanied by enhanced PKC activity. Additionally CCK1R activation induces NAADP generation (Yamasaki et al., 2004, 2005), facilitating Ca2+ release through lysosomal TPC2 channels in close proximity to the apical ER. This localized Ca2+ release may further sensitize IP3Rs (Yuan et al., 2024), amplifying and shaping Ca2+ signals and thus contributing to the unique spatial and temporal dynamics of CCK-evoked Ca2+ responses in pancreatic acinar cells (Calcraft et al., 2009; Cancela et al., 2002; Petersen, 2023; Takano & Yule, 2023; Yule et al., 1991). Future important questions include defining the biochemical pathway responsible for NAADP production and investigating how the spatial relationship between TPC2 and IP3R channels influences the characteristics of Ca2+ signals in physiological and pathophysiological conditions in the exocrine pancreas.
Materials and methods
DNA plasmids and chemicals
The plasmids encoding human M3R (66250) and CCK1R (66236) were from Addgene.
Plasmids encoding D1R, D2R, LPA2R and 5-HT2AR were subcloned from the PRESTO-Tango library (Addgene kit no. 1000000068, provided by Dr Bryan Roth, University of North Carolina, NC) into pcDNA3.1 plasmids removing V2-tail, TEV site and tTA sequences. BRET sensor constructs encoding Gβ1-Venus156–239 and Gγ 2-Venus1–155 were provided by Dr Nevin A. Lambert (Augusta University, Augusta, GA). Gα proteins and masGRK3CT-Nluc constructs were provided by Dr Kirill A. Martemyanov (UF Scripps Biomedical Research, Jupiter, FL). YM-254890 was purchased from Tocris, Pittsburgh, U.S.A (7352/1) and dissolved in DMSO at 10 mM, CCh was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA (C4382) and CCK was purchased from Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA (11661).
Cell cultures and transfections
Human embryonic kidney HEK293T/17 cells (RRID:CVCL_1926) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (CRL-11268) and grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Gibco, Norristown, PA, USA, 10567–014) enriched with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Biowest, Bradenton, FL, USA, 291G23), non-essential amino acids (Gibco, 11140–050), penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml) (Gibco, 15140–122) and amphotericin B (250 μg/ml) (Thermo-Fisher, 15290–018). Cells were grown at 37°C in a humidified incubator in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cells were regularly checked for mycoplasma contamination. Two million cells were plated in each well of six-well plates in antibiotic-free medium and 10% dialysed FBS (Biowest, 347G18-D) for 4 h, and then transfected with DNA plasmid (2.5 μg) and polyethylenimine (7.5 μl) in the ratio 1:3 (Polysciences, Warrington, PA USA 23966). The following optimized amount of each DNA plasmid was co-transfected: 208 ng of GPCR, 833 ng of Gα protein, 208 ng of Gβ1-Venus156–239, 208 ng of Gγ 2-Venus1–155 and 13 ng of masGRK3CT-Nluc; 208 ng of DNA plasmids encoding chaperones Ric8B (for Gs) or Ric8A (for Gq and G11) was also included. The empty vector pcDNA3.1 was used to normalize the total amount of transfected plasmids. After transfection cells were incubated for 16 h before use.
G protein NanoBRET assay
GPCR activation in live cells was measured as a BRET signal between Venus-Gβ1γ 2 and masGRK3CT-Nluc as previously described (Alabdali et al., 2023). The day after transfection cells were briefly washed with PBS and mechanically harvested using a gentle stream of PBS. Cells were collected in 1.5 ml tubes and centrifuged for 5 min at 500 g. The pelleted cells were resuspended in 500 μl of BRET buffer (PBS supplemented with 0.5 mM MgCl2 and 0.1% glucose), and 25 μl of cells in suspension was transferred to 96-well flat-bottomed white micro-plates (Greiner Bio-One, Monroe, NC, USA). Freshly prepared NanoLuc substrate Hikarazine-103 (Coutant et al., 2019, 2020) diluted 1:250 in BRET buffer was applied to the cells. BRET measurements were obtained using a POLARstar Omega microplate reader (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany) at room temperature. The BRET signal was calculated as the ratio of light emitted by Gβ1γ 2-Venus (collected using a 535/30 emission filter) to that emitted by masGRK3CT-Nluc (475/30 filter). Plated cells were incubated with YM-254890 or a vehicle and with the NanoLuc substrate. Baseline recordings were performed for 5 min. After 5 min a vehicle or agonists were applied, and recordings were continued for 3 min. In concentration–response experiments 30 μl of cells per well was plated and mixed with NanoLuc substrate and YM-254890 or a vehicle to the indicated final concentrations. Light emission (535/475) was recorded for 5 min before a vehicle or an agonist was added, and recordings continued for another 3 min. The BRET ratio of the last 10 s of baseline recordings was averaged to obtain a baseline value for each condition. This baseline value was subtracted from the maximal BRET ratio obtained after vehicle or agonist application to calculate the BRET ratio. A threshold of 0.01 was decided a priori to define Gα protein activation.
Pancreatic acinar cell isolation
Animals were housed with free access to food and water, unless fasted overnight for some in vivo experiments as stated. Animals were housed at 19–21°C on a 12-h light–dark cycle. Pancreatic acini were obtained from 16-week-old wild-type (C57BL6NTac) male mice. Acinar cells were isolated as previously described (Messenger et al., 2013). The animals were killed by exposure to CO2 and then by cervical dislocation after unconsciousness. In brief the pancreas was dissected and injected with collagenase (Sigma-Aldrich, C6885), and then incubated in a 37°C water-bath with shaking (180 rpm). Acini were further separated by gentle pipetting, filtering through a 150 μM nylon mesh and layering over a 4% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Alfa Aesar, J65966) solution.
In vitro Ca2+ imaging
Acinar cells were loaded with the Ca2+ indicator fura-2 AM (2 mM) by incubating in imaging buffer (10 mM HEPES, 1.26 mM Ca2+, 137 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 5.5 mM glucose, 1 mM Na2HPO4 and 0.56 mM MgCl2, at pH 7.4) for 30 min. Isolated pancreatic acinar cells were seeded onto coverslips and then perfused with imaging buffer and stimulated with the agonist. Ca2+ imaging was performed using an inverted epifluorescence Nikon microscope with a 40× oil-immersion objective (Numerical Aperature (NA)=1.3). Loaded cells were excited alternately at 340 and 380 nm using a Poly IV monochromator (TILL Photonics, Grafelfing, Germany), and emission was monitored at 530 nm, as previously described (Arige et al., 2022). Images were captured every 500 ms with an exposure of 10 ms and 4 × 4 binning using a digital camera driven by TILL Photonics software and exported to Microsoft Excel and analysed using Prism (GraphPad, Boston, MA, USA).
In vivo Ca2+ imaging
Mist1CreERT2+/– × GCaMP6f+/– transgenic mice served as the experimental subjects for Ca2+ imaging of the pancreas in vivo. Mist1CreERT2+/– × GCaMP6f+/– transgenic mice were produced by crossing GCaMP6fflox mice (Jackson Laboratory, Jax 028865) with Mist1CreERT2 mice (Jackson Laboratory, Jax 029228, a gift from Dr Catherine Ovitt, University of Rochester). Tamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich, T5648, 0.25 mg/g of body weight) was administered to the mice via oral gavage for three consecutive days at least 1 week prior to imaging to excise the loxP sites flanking the STOP codon allowing expression of the Ca2+ indicator within the exocrine pancreas. The mice were fasted overnight, and for imaging of feeding-induced activity the mice were gavage fed with 0.3 ml of nutrition gel (Bio-Serv Nutra Gel) 15 min prior to the surgical procedure. The mice were anaesthetized i.p. with an injection of ketamine (60–100 mg) and xylazine (10–20mg), with the degree of anaesthesia confirmed by a toe pinch. The gland was exposed, as described previously (Takano & Yule, 2022; Takano et al., 2021). The immobilized gland was secured within the holder using a cover glass and maintained in Hank’s salt solution (HBSS). Ca2+ imaging was conducted in vivo via two-photon microscopy using an Olympus FVMPE-RS system equipped with an Insight X3 pulsed laser (Spectra-Physics) utilizing a heated (OKOLab COL2532) 25× water-immersion lens (Olympus XLPlan NA = 1.05 W MP). GCaMP6f was excited at 950 nm, and emission was recorded between 495 and 540 nm, with images captured at 0.5-s intervals for 3-min durations with or without the presence of 5 Hz electrical stimulation applied to the gland through bipolar electrode wires. After the experiment the animal was killed by an overdose of ketamine/xylazine. Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons, as indicated in the figure legends.
Patch clamp electrophysiology
Acinar cells were allowed to adhere to Cell-Tak (Radnor, PA, USA)-coated glass coverslips for 15 min before experimentation. Coverslips were transferred to a chamber containing an extracellular bath solution (155 mM tetraethylammonium chloride to block K+ channels, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.2). Cl− currents in individual cells were measured in the whole-cell patch clamp configuration using pClamp 9 and an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Molecular Devices). Recordings were sampled at 2 kHz and filtered at 1 kHz. Pipette resistances were 3–5 MΩ, and seal resistances were >1 GΩ. Pipette solutions (pH 7.2) containing 60 mM tetraethylammonium chloride, 90 mM tetraethylammonium glutamate, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM HEDTA and 20 μM CaCl2 were used to mimic physiological buffering and basal [Ca2+]i conditions (~100 nM Ca2+). Free [Ca2+] was estimated using MaxChelator freeware. Agonists were directly perfused onto individual cells using a multibarrel perfusion pipette. Chloride currents after agonist application were monitored with a single voltage step to 80 mV from a holding potential of −80 mV every second until current magnitudes reached a plateau. Current–voltage relationships were obtained in 20 mV incremental steps between −80 and 120 mV from a holding potential of −50 mV.
Amylase secretion assay
Acini were maintained and treated at 37°C in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Thermo Fisher, 21063–029) supplemented with 0.1% BSA and 0.01% soybean trypsin inhibitor (Thermo Fisher, 17075–029). Isolated acini were pre-treated with 0.05% DMSO (Sigma, 276855) or 1 μM YM-254890 (Tocris Biosciences, 568580-02-9) for 10 min, and then incubated for 30 min with CCK-8 (Echelon Biosciences, Salt Lake City, UT, USA 471–47) or carbachol (Sigma-Aldrich, PHR1511) as indicated. Amylase released into the medium was measured using Phadebas Amylase Assay tablets (Magle Life Sciences, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1302) as previously described (Messenger et al., 2013). Amylase secretion was expressed as amylase absorbance units in the medium normalized to total cellular amylase present prior to the start of secretory stimulation.
Supplementary Material
Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of the HTML view of the article. Supporting information files available:
Key points.
An increase in cytoplasmic Ca2+ and PKC activity after CCK and ACh stimulation following feeding is a pivotal event in the activation of fluid secretion and exocytosis from pancreatic acinar cells.
In contrast to ACh, it has been suggested that at physiological concentrations, CCK stimulation results in the production of nicotinic acid dinucleotide adenine phosphate, without activating the canonical Gq/11 pathway, and the production of inositol 1,4,5,-trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG).
After having established that YM-254890 is an exquisitely selective Gq/11 inhibitor, we show that Ca2+ signals stimulated in vitro and in vivo in response to both M3R and CCK1R stimulation are completely inhibited by YM-254890.
YM-254890 completely abrogates Ca2+-activated Cl− current activation, pivotal for fluid secretion together with amylase secretion stimulated by both M3R and CCK1R activation.
We conclude that ACh and CCK stimulation results in Gq/11 activation, an increase in IP3 and DAG, and this event is fundamentally important for exocrine function.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the members of the Yule laboratory for helpful comments during the course of these studies.
Funding
The study was supported by NIH grants, AA028852, to G.E.G. and DC022104 to C.O.
Biography

Takahiro Takano completed his PhD in cell biology at New York Medical College and is currently an assistant professor in the Department of Pharmacology and Physiology at the University of Rochester Medical Center. Since 2019 his research has focused on establishing methods to directly measure Ca2+ dynamics in exocrine glands of live animals under physiological conditions utilizing multiphoton microscopy and genetically encoded calcium probes expressed in intact tissue. Luca Franchini has completed his PhD in pharmacological, experimental and clinical sciences at the University of Milan in 2021, focusing on hippocampal synaptic plasticity and NMDA receptor pharmacology. Since then he has been a post-doctoral fellow at the University of Rochester in Cesare Orlandi’s laboratory, investigating orphan G protein-coupled receptor signalling and uncovering their endogenous ligands.
Footnotes
The peer review history is available in the Supporting Information section of this article (https://doi.org/10.1113/JP288957#support-information-section).
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Data availability statement
All original raw data (image files and analysis) are retained on a University of Rochester server, and access is available on request.
References
- Alabdali R, Franchini L, & Orlandi C (2023). Galpha protein signaling bias at serotonin 1A receptor. Molecular Pharmacology, 104(5), 230–238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alzayady KJ, Wang L, Chandrasekhar R, Wagner LE 2nd, Van Petegem F, & Yule DI (2016). Defining the stoichiometry of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate binding required to initiate Ca2+ release. Science Signaling, 9(422), ra35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arige V, Terry LE, Wagner LE 2nd, Malik S, Baker MR, Fan G, Joseph SK, Serysheva II, & Yule DI (2022). Functional determination of calcium-binding sites required for the activation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(39), e2209267119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calcraft PJ, Ruas M, Pan Z, Cheng X, Arredouani A, Hao X, Tang J, Rietdorf K, Teboul L, Chuang KT, Lin P, Xiao R, Wang C, Zhu Y, Lin Y, Wyatt CN, Parrington J, Ma J, Evans AM, … Zhu MX (2009). NAADP mobilizes calcium from acidic organelles through two-pore channels. Nature, 459(7246), 596–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cancela JM (2001). Specific Ca2+ signaling evoked by cholecystokinin and acetylcholine: The roles of NAADP, cADPR, and IP3. Annual Review of Physiology, 63(1), 99–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cancela JM, Gerasimenko OV, Gerasimenko JV, Tepikin AV, & Petersen OH (2000). Two different but converging messenger pathways to intracellular Ca(2+) release: the roles of nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate, cyclic ADP-ribose and inositol trisphosphate. European Molecular Biology Organization Journal, 19(11), 2549–2557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cancela JM, Van Coppenolle F, Galione A, Tepikin AV, & Petersen OH (2002). Transformation of local Ca2+ spikes to global Ca2+ transients: The combinatorial roles of multiple Ca2+ releasing messengers. European Molecular Biology Organization Journal, 21(5), 909–919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coutant EP, Gagnot G, Hervin V, Baatallah R, Goyard S, Jacob Y, Rose T, & Janin YL (2020). Bioluminescence profiling of NanoKAZ/NanoLuc luciferase using a chemical library of coelenterazine analogues. Chemistry (Weinheim An Der Bergstrasse, Germany), 26(4), 948–958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coutant EP, Goyard S, Hervin V, Gagnot G, Baatallah R, Jacob Y, Rose T, & Janin YL (2019). Gram-scale synthesis of luciferins derived from coelenterazine and original insights into their bioluminescence properties. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, 17(15), 3709–3713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dehaye JP, Winand J, Poloczek P, & Christophe J (1984). Characterization of muscarinic cholinergic receptors on rat pancreatic acini by N-[3H]methylscopolamine binding. Their relationship with calcium 45 efflux and amylase secretion. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 259(1), 294–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foskett JK, White C, Cheung KH, & Mak DO (2007). Inositol trisphosphate receptor Ca2+ release channels. Physiological Reviews, 87(2), 593–658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Futatsugi A, Nakamura T, Yamada MK, Ebisui E, Nakamura K, Uchida K, Kitaguchi T, Takahashi-Iwanaga H, Noda T, Aruga J, & Mikoshiba K (2005). IP3 receptor types 2 and 3 mediate exocrine secretion underlying energy metabolism. Science, 309(5744), 2232–2234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gerasimenko JV, Charlesworth RM, Sherwood MW, Ferdek PE, Mikoshiba K, Parrington J, Petersen OH, & Gerasimenko OV (2015). Both RyRs and TPCs are required for NAADP-induced intracellular Ca(2+) release. Cell Calcium, 58(3), 237–245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giovannucci DR, Bruce JI, Straub SV, Arreola J, Sneyd J, Shuttleworth TJ, & Yule DI (2002). Cytosolic Ca(2+) and Ca(2+)-activated Cl(−) current dynamics: Insights from two functionally distinct mouse exocrine cells. The Journal of Physiology, 540(2), 469–484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giovannucci DR, Groblewski GE, Sneyd J, & Yule DI (2000). Targeted phosphorylation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors selectively inhibits localized Ca2+ release and shapes oscillatory Ca2+ signals. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275(43), 33704–33711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gu F, Kruger A, Roggenkamp HG, Alpers R, Lodygin D, Jaquet V, Mockl F, Hernandez CL, Winterberg K, Bauche A, Rosche A, Grasberger H, Kao JY, Schetelig D, Werner R, Schroder K, Carty M, Bowie AG, Huber S, … Guse AH (2021). Dual NADPH oxidases DUOX1 and DUOX2 synthesize NAADP and are necessary for Ca(2+) signaling during T cell activation. Science Signaling, 14(709), eabe3800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang KT, Wagner LE, Takano T, Lin XX, Bagavant H, Deshmukh U, & Yule DI (2024). Dysregulated Ca(2+) signaling, fluid secretion, and mitochondrial function in a mouse model of early Sjogren’s syndrome. bioRxiv. 10.7554/eLife.97069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jensen RT, Lemp GF, & Gardner JD (1980). Interaction of cholecystokinin with specific membrane receptors on pancreatic acinar cells. Proceedings National Academy of Science USA, 77(4), 2079–2083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kidd JF, & Thorn P (2000). Intracellular Ca2+ and Cl− channel activation in secretory cells. Annual Review of Physiology, 62(1), 493–513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LeBeau AP, Yule DI, Groblewski GE, & Sneyd J (1999). Agonist-dependent phosphorylation of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor: A possible mechanism for agonist-specific calcium oscillations in pancreatic acinar cells. Journal of General Physiology, 113(6), 851–872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee MG, Xu X, Zeng W, Diaz J, Wojcikiewicz RJ, Kuo TH, Wuytack F, Racymaekers L, & Muallem S (1997). Polarized expression of Ca2+ channels in pancreatic and salivary gland cells. Correlation with initiation and propagation of [Ca2+]i waves. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272(25), 15765–15770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liddle RA (1995). Regulation of cholecystokinin secretion by intraluminal releasing factors. American Journal of Physiology, 269, G319–G327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matozaki T, Goke B, Tsunoda Y, Rodriguez M, Martinez J, & Williams JA (1990). Two functionally distinct cholecystokinin receptors show different modes of action on Ca2+ mobilization and phospholipid hydrolysis in isolated rat pancreatic acini. Studies using a new cholecystokinin analog, JMV-180. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 265(11), 6247–6254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matozaki T, Sakamoto C, Nagao M, Nishizaki H, & Baba S (1988). G protein in stimulation of PI hydrolysis by CCK in isolated rat pancreatic acinar cells. American Journal of Physiology, 255, E652–E659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matozaki T, & Williams JA (1989). Multiple sources of 1,2-diacylglycerol in isolated rat pancreatic acini stimulated by cholecystokinin. Involvement of phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate and phosphatidylcholine hydrolysis. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 264(25), 14729–14734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matozaki T, & Williams JA (1992). Regulation of phospholipid hydrolysis in streptolysin-O-permeabilized rat pancreatic acini. Pancreas, 7(1), 59–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Menteyne A, Burdakov A, Charpentier G, Petersen OH, & Cancela JM (2006). Generation of specific Ca(2+) signals from Ca(2+) stores and endocytosis by differential coupling to messengers. Current Biology, 16(19), 1931–1937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Messenger SW, Thomas DD, Falkowski MA, Byrne JA, Gorelick FS, & Groblewski GE (2013). Tumor protein D52 controls trafficking of an apical endolysosomal secretory pathway in pancreatic acinar cells. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver physiology, 305(6), G439–G452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osipchuk YV, Wakui M, Yule DI, Gallacher DV, & Petersen OH (1990). Cytoplasmic Ca2+ oscillations evoked by receptor stimulation, G-protein activation, internal application of inositol trisphosphate or Ca2+: Simultaneous microfluorimetry and Ca2+ dependent Cl−current recording in single pancreatic acinar cells. European Molecular Biology Organization Journal, 9(3), 697–704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park MK, Lomax RB, Tepikin AV, & Petersen OH (2001). Local uncaging of caged Ca(2+) reveals distribution of Ca(2+)-activated Cl(−) channels in pancreatic acinar cells. Proceedings National Academy of Science USA, 98(19), 10948–10953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petersen OH (1992). Stimulus-secretion coupling: Cytoplasmic calcium signals and the control of ion channels in exocrine acinar cells. The Journal of Physiology, 448(1), 1–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petersen OH (2023). The 2022 George E Palade Medal Lecture: toxic Ca(2+) signals in acinar, stellate and endogenous immune cells are important drivers of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology, 23(1), 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petersen OH, & Findlay I (1987). Electrophysiology of the pancreas. Physiological Reviews, 67(3), 1054–1116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Powers RE, Johnson PC, Houlihan MJ, Saluja AK, & Steer ML (1985). Intracellular Ca2+ levels and amylase secretion in quin 2-loaded mouse pancreatic acini. American Journal of Physiology, 248(5), C535–C541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Powers RE, Saluja AK, Houlihan MJ, & Steer ML (1985). Inositol trisphosphate production and amylase secretion in mouse pancreatic acini. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 131(1), 284–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roderick HL, Berridge MJ, & Bootman MD (2003). Calcium-induced calcium release. Current Biology, 13(11), R425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roderick HL, & Bootman MD (2003). Bi-directional signalling from the InsP3 receptor: Regulation by calcium and accessory factors. Biochemical Society Transactions, 31(5), 950–953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sankaran H, Goldfine ID, Deveney CW, Wong KY, & Williams JA (1980). Binding of cholecystokinin to high affinity receptors on isolated rat pancreatic acini. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 255(5), 1849–1853. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Satoh A, Gukovskaya AS, Nieto JM, Cheng JH, Gukovsky I, Reeve JR Jr., Shimosegawa T, & Pandol SJ (2004). PKC-delta and -epsilon regulate NF-kappaB activation induced by cholecystokinin and TNF-alpha in pancreatic acinar cells. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 287(3), G582–G591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmid SW, Modlin IM, Tang LH, Stoch A, Rhee S, Nathanson MH, Scheele GA, & Gorelick FS (1998). Telenzepine-sensitive muscarinic receptors on rat pancreatic acinar cells. American Journal of Physiology, 274, G734–G741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schnefel S, Profrock A, Hinsch KD, & Schulz I (1990). Cholecystokinin activates Gi1-, Gi2-, Gi3- and several gs-proteins in rat pancreatic acinar cells. Biochemical Journal, 269(2), 483–488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schrage R, Schmitz AL, Gaffal E, Annala S, Kehraus S, Wenzel D, Bullesbach KM, Bald T, Inoue A, Shinjo Y, Galandrin S, Shridhar N, Hesse M, Grundmann M, Merten N, Charpentier TH, Martz M, Butcher AJ, Slodczyk T, … Kostenis E (2015). The experimental power of FR900359 to study gq-regulated biological processes. Nature Communications, 6(1), 10156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shin DM, Luo X, Wilkie TM, Miller LJ, Peck AB, Humphreys-Beher MG, & Muallem S (2001). Polarized expression of G protein-coupled receptors and an all-or-none discharge of Ca2+ pools at initiation sites of [Ca2+]i waves in polarized exocrine cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276(47), 44146–44156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Streb H, Irvine RF, Berridge MJ, & Schulz I (1983). Release of Ca2+ from a nonmitochondrial intracellular store in pancreatic acinar cells by inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate. Nature, 306(5938), 67–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takano T, Wahl AM, Huang KT, Narita T, Rugis J, Sneyd J, & Yule DI (2021). Highly localized intracellular Ca(2+) signals promote optimal salivary gland fluid secretion. eLife, 10, e66170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takano T, & Yule DI (2022). In vivo Ca(2+) imaging in mouse salivary glands. Bio-Protocol, 12(7), e4380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takano T, & Yule DI (2023). Ca(2+) signals in pancreatic acinar cells in response to physiological stimulation in vivo. The Journal of Physiology, 601(12), 2391–2405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takano T, & Yule DI (2024). Neuronal and hormonal control of Ca(2+) signalling in exocrine glands: insight from in vivo studies. The Journal of Physiology, 602(14), 3341–3350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsvilovskyy V, Ottenheijm R, Kriebs U, Schutz A, Diakopoulos KN, Jha A, Bildl W, Wirth A, Bock J, Jaslan D, Ferro I, Taberner FJ, Kalinina O, Hildebrand S, Wissenbach U, Weissgerber P, Vogt D, Eberhagen C, Mannebach S, … Freichel M (2024). OCaR1 end-ows exocytic vesicles with autoregulatory competence by preventing uncontrolled Ca2+ release, exocytosis, and pancreatic tissue damage. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 134(7), e169428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Voss JH (2023). Recommended tool compounds: application of YM-254890 and FR900359 to interrogate galpha(q/11)-mediated signaling pathways. American Chemical Society Pharmacology & Translational Science, 6(12), 1790–1800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wahl AM, Takano T, Su S, Warner BM, Perez P, Sneyd J, & Yule DI (2023). Structural and functional analysis of salivary intercalated duct cells reveals a secretory phenotype. The Journal of Physiology, 601(20), 4539–4556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams JA (1993). Stimulus-secretion coupling in pancreatic acinar cells. The pancreas: Biology, pathobiology, and disease, 167–189. [Google Scholar]
- Williams JA (2001). Intracellular signaling mechanisms activated by cholecystokinin-regulating synthesis and secretion of digestive enzymes in pancreatic acinar cells. Annual Review of Physiology, 63(1), 77–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams JA, Korc M, & Dormer RL (1978). Action of secretagogues on a new preparation of functionally intact, isolated pancreatic acini. American Journal of Physiology, 235, 517–524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamasaki M, Masgrau R, Morgan AJ, Churchill GC, Patel S, Ashcroft SJ, & Galione A (2004). Organelle selection determines agonist-specific Ca2+ signals in pancreatic acinar and beta cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279(8), 7234–7240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamasaki M, Thomas JM, Churchill GC, Garnham C, Lewis AM, Cancela JM, Patel S, & Galione A (2005). Role of NAADP and cADPR in the induction and maintenance of agonist-evoked Ca2+ spiking in mouse pancreatic acinar cells. Current Biology, 15(9), 874–878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan Y, Arige V, Saito R, Mu Q, Brailoiu GC, Pereira GJS, Bolsover SR, Keller M, Bracher F, Grimm C, Brailoiu E, Marchant JS, Yule DI, & Patel S (2024). Two-pore channel-2 and inositol trisphosphate receptors coordinate Ca(2+) signals between lysosomes and the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell Reports, 43(1), 113628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yule DI, Baker CW, & Williams JA (1999). Calcium signaling in rat pancreatic acinar cells: A role for Galphaq, Galpha11, and Galpha14. American Journal of Physiology, 276, G271–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yule DI, Ernst SA, Ohnishi H, & Wojcikiewicz RJ (1997). Evidence that zymogen granules are not a physiologically relevant calcium pool. Defining the distribution of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors in pancreatic acinar cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272(14), 9093–9098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yule DI, Lawrie AM, & Gallacher DV (1991). Acetylcholine and cholecystokinin induce different patterns of oscillating calcium signals in pancreatic acinar cells. Cell Calcium, 12(2–3), 145–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yule DI, Tseng MJ, Williams JA, & Logdson CD (1993). A cloned CCK-A receptor transduces multiple signals in response to full and partial agonists. American Journal of Physiology, 265, G999–G1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All original raw data (image files and analysis) are retained on a University of Rochester server, and access is available on request.
