Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Sports Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Sports Medicine
. 1994 Mar;28(1):38–42. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.28.1.38

Effects of rider position on continuous wave Doppler responses to maximal cycle ergometry.

W D Franke 1, C B Betz 1, R H Humphrey 1
PMCID: PMC1332156  PMID: 8044492

Abstract

Using 10 well-trained (VO2peak = 60.6 ml kg-1min-1) college age cyclists and continuous wave Doppler echocardiography, peak acceleration (PkA) and velocity (PkV) of blood flow in the ascending aorta, and the stroke velocity integral (SVI) were assessed to determine if rider position influenced the central haemodynamic responses to graded maximal cycle ergometry. Cyclist position was determined by hand placement on the uprights (UPRI) or drops (DROP) of conventional handlebars or using aerodynamic handlebars (AHB). All subjects consistently achieved a peak workload of 300 W. The Doppler variables did not differ significantly between rider positions at each stage of the maximal exercise tests but did change in response to increasing workloads. PkA was significantly (P < 0.05) greater at workloads > or = 240 W versus < or = 120 W. PkV increased significantly (P < 0.05) up to 180 W and then reached a plateau. SVI increased to a workload of 120 W and then progressively declined, becoming significantly (P < 0.05) less at 300 W. For each stage, neither submaximal VO2, VI nor heart rate (HR) differed significantly between each trial. These results suggest that rider position does not affect the physiological response to maximal bicycle ergometry as responses to each position are similar.

Full text

PDF
38

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ASTRAND P. O., CUDDY T. E., SALTIN B., STENBERG J. CARDIAC OUTPUT DURING SUBMAXIMAL AND MAXIMAL WORK. J Appl Physiol. 1964 Mar;19:268–274. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1964.19.2.268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen K., Vik-Mo H. Role of the Frank-Starling mechanism during maximal semisupine exercise after oral atenolol. Br Heart J. 1982 Aug;48(2):149–155. doi: 10.1136/hrt.48.2.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryg R. J., Labovitz A. J., Mehdirad A. A., Williams G. A., Chaitman B. R. Effect of coronary artery disease on Doppler-derived parameters of aortic flow during upright exercise. Am J Cardiol. 1986 Jul 1;58(1):14–19. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90233-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Daley P. J., Sagar K. B., Wann L. S. Doppler echocardiographic measurement of flow velocity in the ascending aorta during supine and upright exercise. Br Heart J. 1985 Dec;54(6):562–567. doi: 10.1136/hrt.54.6.562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Elkayam U., Gardin J. M., Berkley R., Hughes C. A., Henry W. L. The use of Doppler flow velocity measurement to assess the hemodynamic response to vasodilators in patients with heart failure. Circulation. 1983 Feb;67(2):377–383. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.67.2.377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ericson M. O., Nisell R. Efficiency of pedal forces during ergometer cycling. Int J Sports Med. 1988 Apr;9(2):118–122. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Faria I., Dix C., Frazer C. Effect of body position during cycling on heart rate, pulmonary ventilation, oxygen uptake and work output. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1978 Mar;18(1):49–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gardin J. M., Kozlowski J., Dabestani A., Murphy M., Kusnick C., Allfie A., Russell D., Henry W. L. Studies of Doppler aortic flow velocity during supine bicycle exercise. Am J Cardiol. 1986 Feb 1;57(4):327–332. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90913-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harrison M. R., Smith M. D., Nissen S. E., Grayburn P. A., DeMaria A. N. Use of exercise Doppler echocardiography to evaluate cardiac drugs: effects of propranolol and verapamil on aortic blood flow velocity and acceleration. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 May;11(5):1002–1009. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)90058-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kelbaek H., Christensen N. J., Godtfredsen J. Left ventricular volumes during graded upright exercise in healthy untrained subjects. Clin Physiol. 1988 Feb;8(1):51–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1988.tb00261.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Labovitz A. J., Pearson A. C., Chaitman B. R. Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular function before and after intravenous dipyridamole stress testing for detection of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1988 Dec 1;62(17):1180–1185. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90256-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Manyari D. E., Kostuk W. J. Left and right ventricular function at rest and during bicycle exercise in the supine and sitting positions in normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease. Assessment by radionuclide ventriculography. Am J Cardiol. 1983 Jan 1;51(1):36–42. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(83)80008-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mehta N., Boyle G., Bennett D., Gilmour S., Noble M. I., Mills C. M., Pugh S. Hemodynamic response to treadmill exercise in normal volunteers: an assessment by Doppler ultrasonic measurement of ascending aortic blood velocity and acceleration. Am Heart J. 1988 Nov;116(5 Pt 1):1298–1307. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90455-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nordeen-Snyder K. S. The effect of bicycle seat height variation upon oxygen consumption and lower limb kinematics. Med Sci Sports. 1977 Summer;9(2):113–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Plotnick G. D., Becker L. C., Fisher M. L., Gerstenblith G., Renlund D. G., Fleg J. L., Weisfeldt M. L., Lakatta E. G. Use of the Frank-Starling mechanism during submaximal versus maximal upright exercise. Am J Physiol. 1986 Dec;251(6 Pt 2):H1101–H1105. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1986.251.6.H1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sabbah H. N., Przybylski J., Albert D. E., Stein P. D. Peak aortic blood acceleration reflects the extent of left ventricular ischemic mass at risk. Am Heart J. 1987 Apr;113(4):885–890. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(87)90048-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stein R. A., Michielli D., Diamond J., Horwitz B., Krasnow N. The cardiac response to exercise training: echocardiographic analysis at rest and during exercise. Am J Cardiol. 1980 Aug;46(2):219–225. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(80)90061-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stenberg J., Astrand P. O., Ekblom B., Royce J., Saltin B. Hemodynamic response to work with different muscle groups, sitting and supine. J Appl Physiol. 1967 Jan;22(1):61–70. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1967.22.1.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Thompson W. R., Shapiro J., Thompson D. L., Bulawa W. Comparison of ventricular volumes in normal and post-myocardial infarction subjects. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987 Oct;19(5):430–435. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wallmeyer K., Wann L. S., Sagar K. B., Kalbfleisch J., Klopfenstein H. S. The influence of preload and heart rate on Doppler echocardiographic indexes of left ventricular performance: comparison with invasive indexes in an experimental preparation. Circulation. 1986 Jul;74(1):181–186. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.74.1.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Weiss J. L., Weisfeldt M. L., Mason S. J., Garrison J. B., Livengood S. V., Fortuin N. J. Evidence of frank-starling effect in man during severe semisupine exercise. Circulation. 1979 Apr;59(4):655–661. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.59.4.655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wyns W., Melin J. A., Vanbutsele R. J., De Coster P. M., Steels M., Piret L., Detry J. M. Assessment of right and left ventricular volumes during upright exercise in normal men. Eur Heart J. 1982 Dec;3(6):529–536. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Sports Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES