Skip to main content
Frontiers in Nutrition logoLink to Frontiers in Nutrition
. 2026 Jun 18;13:1851487. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2026.1851487

Milk fat globule membrane in early-life nutrition: composition, production, and biological effects on infant immune maturation, intestinal development, neurocognitive function, and growth

Emine Kocyigit 1, Elif Çelik 2, Özge Cemali 3, Oya Berkay Karaca 4, Bence Raposa 5,*,†, Duygu Ağagündüz 6,*,†
PMCID: PMC13323632  PMID: 42395632

Abstract

The milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) is a trilayered structure encasing fat globules in mammalian milk, primarily composed of phospholipids, glycoproteins, and bioactive molecules. Recent research indicates that MFGM plays a fundamental role in early-life health, particularly through its effects on gut microbiota development and immune system maturation. In the initial months of life, the infant’s gut microbiome undergoes rapid colonization, essential for immunological tolerance, metabolic programming, and pathogen defense. Numerous studies have shown that MFGM components, including sphingomyelin, gangliosides, and glycoproteins, exhibit prebiotic-like effects by facilitating the proliferation of beneficial bacteria, such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species. Furthermore, MFGM supplementation in infant formulas has been linked to microbiota profiles that more closely resemble those of breastfed infants, enhanced gastrointestinal function, cognitive development, and a decreased incidence of diseases. This review clarifies how MFGM influences gut microbiota regulation, including increased barrier function, anti-inflammatory properties, and pathogen defense. Moreover, it highlights the possibility of MFGM-enriched dietary approaches to enhance proper gut colonization and promote long-term infant health, particularly in formula-fed populations. Although the results are encouraging, more longitudinal and mechanistic investigations are necessary to comprehensively clarify the influence of MFGM on the gut microbiome and the microbiota-mediated health benefits for growth and development.

Keywords: growth, health, infant, microbiome, milk fat globule membrane, neurocognitive

1. Introduction

The early years of life are a crucial time for organ development and metabolism, and they may also influence a person’s vulnerability to subsequent physiological or stress-related conditions (1). The development of the infant gastrointestinal tract, encompassing the growth of gut microbiota and the maturation of the immune system, has significant long-term implications for health (2). During and immediately following birth, the infant’s gut microbiome experiences rapid colonization, a phenomenon that aids in immunological tolerance, metabolic control, and pathogen defense. Multiple factors influence the composition of the infant gut microbiota, including mode of delivery, environmental exposures, antibiotic use, and dietary patterns, with diet representing one of the most significant determinants (3, 4). Microbial dysbiosis in early life has been linked to a heightened risk of illnesses like allergies and type 1 diabetes (3, 4). Consequently, understanding the determinants of early microbiota development and strategies that support its healthy establishment is essential for enhancing child health outcomes (5, 6).

Human milk provides neonates with essential nutrients (proteins, carbohydrates, long-chain fatty acids, vitamins, minerals, etc.), immunological protection (including antibodies and oligosaccharides), and support for gastrointestinal health—each of which is critical for normal growth and development (7, 8). The MFGM has attracted increasing interest due to its intricate structure and bioactive constituents. The MFGM is rich in phospholipids, sphingolipids, cholesterol, and glycoproteins, which may play roles in immunological modulation, gut barrier integrity, and neurodevelopment (7, 9, 10). In contrast to human milk, commercial infant formulas frequently lack the natural MFGM structure due to processing methods such as fat separation and homogenization. Consequently, there has been an increased interest in integrating bovine-derived MFGM into infant formula to more closely replicate the structural and functional characteristics of human milk (11–13). Recent studies indicate that infant formulas containing MFGM-coated lipid droplets may enhance lipid digestion and diminish metabolic disparities between formula-fed and breastfed infants (14, 15).

Over the past decade, MFGM has gained prominence in health research as a uniquely bioactive membrane rich in polar lipids and glycoproteins that are largely underrepresented in standard formulas (16). Experimental and clinical studies have indicated that MFGM supplementation may enhance neurodevelopment, alter gut microbiota composition, and provide immune protection during early life. Interest in this component has accelerated as preclinical work showed antiviral and barrier-protective actions (e.g., inhibition of rotavirus binding to intestinal cells and mitigation of mucosal injury), while clinical evidence—including recent randomized trials and a 2024 meta-analysis—has suggested potential benefits for infant neurocognitive outcomes (17–19). Contemporary reviews also highlight potential signals of reduced infection risk and the role of MFGM as an emerging nutraceutical in early-life nutrition. Collectively, these foundational observations justify a focused examination of MFGM composition to understand structure–function relationships and its translational potential (20, 21).

Besides its nutritional roles, MFGM has recently been investigated as a possible matrix for the stability and delivery of probiotics (22–24). The interactions between MFGM components and probiotic bacteria may improve bacterial viability and promote colonization in the gastrointestinal tract (25, 26). These characteristics indicate that MFGM may contribute to both infant nutrition and the advancement of functional foods and novel delivery strategies for bioactive compounds.

A comprehensive synthesis of the current evidence is therefore needed, as the evidence is expanding but still limited. This study reviews the structure and bioactive content of MFGM. It also assesses its possible effects on infant health, focusing on gut microbiota development, immune maturation, neurodevelopment, and growth. The study examines the growing use of MFGM as a probiotic carrier and highlights areas for future research.

2. Literature search strategy

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus using a consistent, reproducible protocol. Predetermined keyword combinations focused on core research areas: milk fat globule membrane and infant/neonate health. Keywords included “milk fat globule membrane,” “MFGM,” “infant nutrition,” “infant formula,” “gut microbiota,” “immune development,” “neurodevelopment,” “cognitive development,” “growth,” “probiotics,” and “clinical study.” Boolean operators (AND/OR) were applied to combine these search terms. Original research papers, clinical trials, preclinical studies, and relevant reviews examining MFGM content, its function in infant/neonate feeding, and its effects on child health were evaluated. Studies analyzing MFGM’s influence on gut microbiota, immune development, neurodevelopment, growth metrics, and probiotic strategies were eligible. Studies unrelated to MFGM or infant health, as well as those failing to link these variables to gut microbiota, immune development, neurodevelopment, growth, or probiotics were excluded. Selected papers were screened by title and abstract, followed by a full review if appropriate. Inclusion depended on topic relevance, research design, and meeting the review’s goals. This protocol strengthened transparency and broadened the scientific scope of the review.

3. Structure and composition of milk fat globule membrane

A comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying membrane formation is crucial for interpreting the complex architecture of the milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) and its potential biological implications (21, 27). The MFGM, which encapsulates milk fat globules (MFGs) in mammalian milk, has a nanoscale trilayer structure that stabilizes and protects MFGs. These globules typically range in diameter from approximately 0.1 to 15 μm, averaging about 4 μm (28). This membrane, formed during the secretion of lipid droplets by mammary epithelial cells, acts as a barrier that protects the lipid core and regulates molecular interactions-functions that are integrated with lipid synthesis, intracellular trafficking, and membrane remodeling. Neutral lipids accumulate within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. This accumulation leads to the formation of cytoplasmic lipid droplets, whose phospholipid monolayer, derived from the ER, provides a surface that separates the hydrophobic lipid core from the aqueous cytoplasm, thus enabling proper lipid storage and mobilization (29, 30). As lipid droplets migrate toward the apical surface of mammary epithelial cells, they become encapsulated by the apical plasma membrane. This process results in a characteristic trilaminar membrane structure, composed of an endoplasmic reticulum-derived monolayer and a plasma membrane bilayer, that both shields the lipid contents from the external environment and provides a functional interface regulating secretion (31).

The MFGM originates during lipid synthesis and fat globule secretion within mammary epithelial cells. It is derived from three distinct sources: the apical plasma membrane, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and post-Golgi vesicular structures of mammary epithelial cells (16). Small lipid droplets (< 0.5 μm in diameter) initially form within the endoplasmic reticulum, where neutral lipids accumulate between the ER bilayer leaflets and are subsequently released into the cytosol as cytoplasmic lipid droplets surrounded by a phospholipid monolayer. ER-associated proteins contribute to the stabilization and maturation of lipid droplets before their transport toward the apical plasma membrane. During the early stages of lipid droplet formation, a fixed spacing of approximately 10–20 nm is observed between lipid droplets and the apical plasma membrane. This space is associated with the electron-dense inner leaflet of the apical plasma membrane and associated phospholipids (PLs), which constitute the core components of the MFGM bilayer (16, 28, 32).

Structurally, the MFGM is composed predominantly of lipids (~30–75%) and proteins (~25–70%), along with smaller amounts of carbohydrates (mainly glyco-conjugates) and trace RNA, and it contributes to stabilizing the fat globule as a natural oil-in-water emulsion (33, 34). This membrane stabilizes milk fat globules within a natural oil-in-water emulsion. Enriched with phospholipids, sphingolipids, cholesterol, and membrane-associated glycoproteins, it serves as a biologically active interface that facilitates selective molecular interactions and enhances functional stability in milk. Its composition may vary based on several factors, including species physiology, extraction and purification methods, milk processing, and analytical techniques used to characterize molecular components (35, 36).

Recent research suggests that infant formulas containing large, phospholipid-coated lipid droplets,engineered to mimic the natural MFGM, may produce beneficial effects on gastrointestinal and neurodevelopmental outcomes (21, 37). A randomized trial reported that the so-called “concept formula” accelerated gut microbiota maturation, promoting butyrate-producing taxa and enhancing metabolomic indicators, while reducing excess adiposity during the first year of life (37). Numerous randomized trials have examined the impact of bovine MFGM-enriched formulas on infant health outcomes. One study reported improved neurodevelopmental outcomes up to 6.5 years of age (38), while the COGNIS follow-up study demonstrated enhanced cognitive performance and alterations in brain structure at six years among children who consumed MFGM-supplemented formula during infancy (39). Recent reviews systematically highlight the nutritional and functional reasons for adding MFGM to infant formulas, as this approach may allow formulas to more closely resemble the structure and bioactivity of human milk. Because key MFGM components exhibit distinct bioactive effects, replicating these features in infant formula may support developmental outcomes similar to those observed in human milk (34, 40). It is important to acknowledge that several intervention studies assess MFGM with other bioactive components, thereby complicating the assignment of observed health benefits exclusively to MFGM supplementation.

Significant knowledge gaps remain. Experimental and clinical evidence suggest MFGM supplementation may be beneficial (41, 42). However, the effects of specific MFGM components on infant outcomes are unclear. Polar lipids may influence neurodevelopment by affecting cell signaling and synaptogenesis. Sphingolipids could alter gut microbiota and help maintain intestinal barriers. Membrane-associated proteins may aid immune maturation by modulating immune responses (43–45). However, the underlying mechanisms remain insufficiently characterized. Most clinical studies test MFGM with other bioactive ingredients in formulas, making it difficult to isolate MFGM’s effects. Comprehensive evidence synthesis is needed to clarify structure–function relationships and guide translational research priorities. The biosynthesis and secretion of MFGs in mammary epithelial cells, together with the structural composition of the MFGM, are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Panel A shows an illustration of mammary epithelial cells producing and secreting milk fat globules, with labeled organelles including the nucleus, endoplasmic reticulum, and Golgi apparatus, and the passage of fat globules through the apical membrane. Panel B displays sources of milk fat globules, such as breast milk, buttermilk, cream, and whey protein, and a diagram of the milk fat globule membrane detailing its multilayered structure with labeled components like triglycerides (TAG), glycolipids, sphingomyelin, cholesterol, butyrophilin, mucins, and associated proteins.

Biosynthesis and secretion of milk fat globules in mammary epithelial cells and structural composition of the milk fat globule membrane. (A) Milk fat globule biosynthesis in mammary epithelial cells. Cytoplasmic lipid droplets (CLDs) are formed from triacylglycerols synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum. These droplets migrate toward the apical plasma membrane. When secreted, the droplet is surrounded by the apical membrane and released into the milk lumen as a mature milk fat globule. This process helps form the trilayer of the milk fat globule membrane. The trilayer includes an endoplasmic reticulum-derived inner phospholipid monolayer and an apical membrane-derived outer phospholipid bilayer (27). (B) Breast milk, buttermilk, cream, and whey-derived fractions represent the primary biological and industrial sources of MFGM. The schematic on the right illustrates the triacylglycerol (TAG) core surrounded by the trilayered MFGM, which is enriched in polar lipids (phosphatidylethanolamine [PE], phosphatidylcholine [PC], phosphatidylinositol [PI], phosphatidylserine [PS], and sphingomyelin), glycolipids, gangliosides, cholesterol, and membrane-specific proteins (e.g., butyrophilin, adipophilin, xanthine dehydrogenase/oxidase, mucins, lactadherin, fatty acid binding protein). These components confer the structural and functional properties of MFGM that underlie its proposed biological effects [Adapted from O’Callaghan et al. (85), created using Canva].

3.1. Milk fat globule membrane lipids

The primary function of MFGM is to provide fatty acids to the infant (36). Triacylglycerols (TAGs) are essential lipids for growth and development and comprise roughly half of an infant’s energy needs and 98% of total milk fat. TAGs are the principal components of the MFG. TAGs are secreted as lipid globules in the mammary gland, surrounded by the MFGM (46). The two types of lipids found in the MFGM are polar and neutral. Polar lipids are composed of glycerophospholipids, including phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylinositol (PI), and phosphatidylserine (PS), sphingophospholipids, such as sphingomyelin (SM), and glycosphingolipids, including gangliosides, cerebrosides, ceramides, and sphingosine. The predominant polar lipids in the human MFGM are SM (27–43%), followed by PC (14–38%), and PE (6–36%). PS and PI constitute 5–6% of the total, whereas ganglioside levels are relatively low (47, 48). Reports have suggested that neutral lipids may constitute around 56% of the MFGM fraction; however, these values often reflect inadequately separated preparations in which core triacylglycerols contaminated the membrane fraction. In the native milk fat globule structure, roughly 95–98% of neutral lipids are sequestered inside the triglyceride-rich core and were not regarded as components of the MFGM (49). Small amounts of diacylglycerol (DAG), monoacylglycerol (MAG), free fatty acids (FFAs), and sterols can range from 0.3 to 2%. Acylglycerols may be detected in MFGM preparations due to contamination occurring during isolation (21, 49). Cholesterol, an important constituent of the cell membrane, along with cholesterol esters, constitutes anadditional component of the neutral lipid component (50).

Lipids in the MFGM facilitate the development of the nervous system and cognitive function (21, 51). Polar lipids, including PLs, gangliosides, and SM, are crucial for the development of the brain and nervous system and for the functioning of the gut and immunity (52–55). SM has been reported to support language development in infants and mitigate memory deterioration; however, there is no direct clinical evidence that SM supplementation improves outcomes in Alzheimer’s disease (56, 57). It has been proposed that cholesterol absorption is reduced in the presence of sphingomyelin because of its strong affinity for cholesterol and its capacity to impede micellar solubilization. Sphingomyelin has been shown to decreas the thermodynamic activity of cholesterol monomers and downregulate NPC1L1 expression in enterocytes, thereby restricting intestinal absorption (58). In obese mouse models, dietary sphingomyelin supplementation decreased intestinal cholesterol absorption, increased fecal lipid excretion, and mitigated hepatic lipid accumulation (59).

3.2. Milk fat globule membrane proteins

MFGM proteins comprise over 100 protein species ranging from 13 to 240 kDa, constitute 1% of the entire globule mass (60), were initially separated using two-dimensional electrophoresis in the late 1990s, with Goldfarb (1997) delivering the earliest systematic protein map via 2-DE. However, proteomic analyses have since progressed considerably: contemporary approaches now frequently employ high-resolution LC–MS/MS, coupled with label-free quantification and glycoproteomic workflows, enabling more comprehensive and quantitative profiling of MFGM protein composition across species and lactational stages (34, 61). MFGM proteins have an asymmetric distribution; proteins embedded within or on both sides of the MFGM are termed integral proteins, while those affixed to the outer surface of the MFGM are referred to as peripheral proteins. Furthermore, some proteins have a weak association with the MFGM, which is crucial for maintaining its physiological functionality (36). Alongside prevalent MFGM proteins, α-lactalbumin, lysozyme, β-casein, clusterin, lactoferrin, immunoglobulins, tenascin, apolipoproteins, and fatty acid synthase have been consistently detected in human MFGM across many proteomic analyses (62, 63).

Membrane proteins are present in both glycosylated and non-glycosylated forms. Glycosylated proteins provide essential functions in cell interaction, localization, immunity, growth, and bacterial interactions. This indicates that MFGM facilitates other biological processes in an infant’s gut beyond energy provision (64, 65). Prominent MFGM proteins include mucin 1 (MUC1), xanthine dehydrogenase/oxidase (XDH/XO), cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36), butyrophilin (BTN), adipophilin (ADPH), periodic acid Schiff 6/7 or lactadherin (PAS 6/7), proteose peptone 3 (PP3), and fatty acid binding protein (FABP). Proteins within the outer membrane of mammary epithelial cells are often glycosylated, except for FABP and ADPH (66, 67). Human MFGM contains carboxyl ester lipase and FABP, whereas bovine MFGM contains glycosylation-associated cell adhesion molecule 1 (GlyCAM1) (12). Bovine milk also contains FABPs, which were suggested to help in the transport of fatty acids across the MFGM (68). However, instead of being a lipid-binding factor, GlyCAM1 was shown to be an immune-related adhesion protein in bovine MFGM. Therefore, GlyCAM1 should not be regarded as functionally analogous to FABPs found in human milk, as its biological role is more closely linked to lymphocyte adhesion and immune signaling (69).

MUCs, including MUC1 and MUC4, represent a category of proteins prevalent in human MFGM (70). MUC1, characterized by high glycosylation, traverses the outer bilayer membrane and facilitates intercellular interaction. It acts as a barrier between microorganisms and connective tissue, safeguarding the gastrointestinal tract of infants from harmful pathogens and exhibiting resistance to digestion (71, 72). BTN, a significant protein found in bovine MFGM, is characterized as a glycosylated transmembrane protein that is integrated into the outer bilayer membrane, similar to MUC1. BTNs belong to the immunoglobulin superfamily, with BTN subfamily one member A1 (BTN1A1) being the specific variant present in human MFGM (34, 73, 74). Han et al. discovered that the knockdown of BTN1A1 in bovine mammary epithelial cells decreased both the size and phospholipid content in lipid droplets. The findings of this study demonstrate that BTN1A1 plays an essential role in regulating lipid droplet production through a mechanism associated with membrane phospholipid content (75). In the study by Pan et al. (15), it was found that adding MFGM before homogenization and milk proteins afterward resulted in a lipid droplet interfacial composition more similar to that of human milk, significantly enhancing lipid digestion by increasing free fatty acid release (76). Zhao et al. (77) found that the interaction between whey protein, the main protein in infant formula, and milk fat globule membrane phospholipids significantly increased the physical stability and fat digestion performance of the emulsion by forming a dense and stable structure at the interface of fat globules (77). A significant improvement in the degree of lipolysis was observed, particularly at an MFGM phospholipid: whey protein ratio of 5:10, with smaller particle size, higher surface charge, and increased free fatty acid release (77).

ADPH (also called perilipin 2) and FABP, which have a high affinity for triglycerides, are included as part of the non-glycosylated MFGM proteins within the inner phospholipid membrane (78). By binding to fatty acids, FABP can control fatty acid solubilization, storage, and transportation across organelles and membranes in cells (79). ADPH controls lipolysis by managing protein access to the lipid droplet surface (80). FABP prevents the adhesion of Escherichia coli to intestinal epithelial cells (in vitro) (81). XDH/XO is a redox enzyme in the intermembrane gap between the monolayer and bilayer, comprising 12% of bovine MFGM proteins (82). XDH/XO forms a tripartite structure with BTN and ADPH, enabling the integration of the apical cell membrane with lipid globules. XDH/XO enhances the antibacterial defense of the gastrointestinal tract through interactions with multiple substrates. Proteomic analyses revealed that XDH/XO is among the most prevalent proteins consistently identified in bovine MFGM, frequently reported with BTN and ADPH, suggesting a structural function in preserving membrane integrity rather than a direct necessity for milk fat secretion (34, 65).

Alongside the main MFGM proteins, MFGM comprises several proteins, including carbonic anhydrase, alkaline phosphatase, lactoferrin, osteopontin, lysozyme, and several enzymes present in low amounts. These proteins serve several functions in neonatal health, including acid neutralization, antimicrobial activity, growth promotion, regulation of innate immunity, and protection against digestion (50, 73).

3.3. Milk fat globule membrane carbohydrates

MFGM carbohydrates are conjugated with proteins and lipids to form glycoproteins or glycolipids, respectively. Glycolipids are categorized into two main types: neutral glycolipids and acidic glycolipids, which include gangliosides. Neutral glycolipids comprise several carbohydrate residues linked to ceramide within the lipid structure, such as glucosylceramide, lactosylceramide, and galactosylceramide. Acidic glycolipids contain oligosaccharides linked to ceramide and include at least one sialic acid residue connected through glycosidic bonds. MUC, BTN, CD36, and PAS 6/7, identified among the proteins in the MFGM, are classified as glycoproteins (83, 84).

4. Advanced strategies for the purification, enrichment, and production of milk fat globule membrane

Scientific and technological advancements have facilitated the extraction and purification of MFGM for diverse applications in nutrition, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and functional food systems. Recovering intact MFGM fractions may help preserve the biological properties of human milk and advance infant nutrition.

MFGM is present in fresh milk and cream, but buttermilk, the by-product of butter manufacturing, is considered the primary industrial source of MFGM constituents (85). Mechanical stressors such as agitation, phase transition, food processing, cooling, and heating affect MFGM structure and composition. These processing conditions may compromise the natural membrane structure, thus modifying the physicochemical and biological characteristics of MFGM-derived components (33, 86). Therefore, enhancing fractionation and purification methods is crucial to maintaining the functional integrity of MFGM.

Microfiltration, ultrafiltration, and diafiltration efficiently concentrate MFGM fractions from dairy by-products. Compared with traditional processing procedures, these techniques enhance the production of phospholipids and membrane-associated proteins while minimizing contamination from non-MFGM proteins (87, 88). Enzymatic treatments can enhance phospholipid recovery; proteolytic enzymes such as pepsin and trypsin hydrolyze caseins and whey proteins, thereby enabling the concentration of phospholipid-rich MFGM fractions by subsequent membrane filtration (84, 89). Importantly, various extraction and purification methods may uniquely influence the structural integrity of MFGM. Membrane filtration methods often maintain natural membrane fragments, whereas solvent extraction and rigorous heat processing might compromise protein-lipid complexes, thereby diminishing biological functionality.

Two dairy-based products contain MFGM components: phospholipid extracts and MFGM-enriched fractions. Phospholipid extracts are typically generated by solvent extraction and are frequently utilized in cosmetic and dermatological formulations, whereas MFGM-enriched components derived from physical separation techniques are predominantly designed for nutritional uses (8, 90). Commercially available MFGM-fortified products include Lacprodan® MFGM-10 (Arla Foods), Vivinal® MFGM (FrieslandCampina Ingredients, Amersfoort, The Netherlands), NZMP SureStart™ Lipid 100, SureStart™ 70, and MFGM Complex Lipids (Fonterra). Some nutraceutical companies are adding MFGM to their omega-3 supplements, which are associated with various health benefits (48, 91). The central concern is whether separated MFGM fractions still preserve the supramolecular structure of the original membrane. Processing steps, including homogenization, heat treatment, and solvent-based extraction, are recognized to modify lipid and protein orientation, thereby compromising the stability of protein-lipid complexes and lowering bioactivity (16, 92). The structural modifications may partially elucidate the diversity observed in intervention studies using bovine-derived MFGM components, underscoring the importance of processing conditions in interpreting biological results.

Conventional infant formulas often include minimal intact MFGM due to procedures such as fat removal, homogenization, and drying; hence, extensive research has concentrated on reintroducing bovine-derived MFGM fractions to more accurately approximate the structural and functional characteristics of human milk (8, 16). Although clinical and preclinical studies have demonstrated the benefits of MFGM supplementation (9, 41), there is no globally standardized method for fortifying infant formula with MFGM-derived bioactive components.

4.1. Milk fat globule membrane as a novel encapsulation matrix for probiotics

MFGM is studied for its nutritional value in infant formula, especially for its ability to support probiotic survival and gut colonization (93). Encapsulation denotes the integration of bioactive compounds into protective matrices that improve their stability, viability, and controlled release during digestion (94–96). MFGM, due to its amphiphilic structure and intricate composition of phospholipids, glycoproteins, and glycolipids, has recently been investigated as a natural encapsulation matrix for probiotic microorganisms.

Interactions between MFGM components and probiotic bacteria may enhance bacterial adhesion and viability in the gastrointestinal environment. The external surface of milk fat globules is mostly hydrophilic, facilitating the adhesion of probiotic bacteria via interactions with phospholipids, glycoproteins, and mucin-like proteins, including MUC1. These interactions may provide protective interfaces that mitigate harm from gastric acidity and bile salts (17, 97). MFGM supplementation enhanced the survival of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus throughout gastrointestinal transit in animal models and modulated the expression of genes associated with exopolysaccharide (EPS) production. Transmission electron microscopy investigations have revealed direct interactions between MFGM phospholipids and the surfaces of certain Lactobacillus strains (98–100). In addition to providing structural protection, MFGM-derived glycans and glycolipids may function as metabolic substrates for particular probiotic species, facilitating bacterial proliferation in carbohydrate-limited environments (8, 16). These data indicate that MFGM may serve not only as a physical carrier but also as a biologically active interface that facilitates probiotic persistence and metabolic activity. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying MFGM–probiotic interactions remain incompletely understood. Emerging evidence indicates that the polar lipid fraction of MFGM, which includes phospholipids, sphingomyelin, and gangliosides, may modulate microbial colonization and mucosal immune signaling (17, 49). These processes could, in turn, contribute to gut–brain axis communication during early life. MFGM has significant potential as a natural encapsulation matrix for probiotic delivery; nevertheless, further research is required to clarify the molecular interactions at play and to assess their impact on probiotic efficacy in the human gastrointestinal tract.

4.2. The effects of milk fat globule membrane on infant health

MFGM is a complex membrane structure surrounding milk fat droplets and contains PLs, sphingolipids, glycoproteins, gangliosides, and various other biologically active components (9, 36). Studies have shown that MFGM exerts significant immunomodulatory effects (101), supports neurological development (102), and contributes to the maturation of the intestinal mucosal barrier (103) during infancy. These health benefits are primarily attributed to its modulatory impact on the gut microbiota (39, 104–111). Microbiota development in the first months after birth plays an important role in shaping lifelong health and disease susceptibility (112, 113). Microbiota-mediated methods through which MFGM may impact infant development and health outcomes have therefore received more study. In this context, the effects of MFGM on microbiota development and its contribution to infant health through these effects have been investigated (39, 106–111, 114–116). The subsequent sections highlight the significance of MFGM in influencing early microbial colonization and the resultant health implications of these microbiota-mediated interactions. Figure 2 illustrates the impact of MFGM on the intestinal microbiota and related health outcomes in infants.

Figure 2.

Illustration shows a breastfeeding infant receiving human milk, with a detailed diagram of the milk fat globule membrane listing its components, such as glycoproteins and lipids. Arrows connect these components to a baby’s intestines, emphasizing roles in intestinal immune maturation, including intestinal structure development, initial gut microbiota establishment, and the regulation of cognitive function, neurodevelopment, and growth by microbiota.

MFGM as a nutritional modulator of gut microbiota and health in infants [adapted from Yadav et al. (64) and Mohamed et al. (86)]. MFGM is enriched in polar lipids, glycolipids, cholesterol, and membrane-specific proteins that support intestinal immune maturation by promoting intestinal development, establishing the gut microbiota, and regulating cognitive, neurodevelopmental, and growth outcomes. Created using Canva.

5. Microbiota-mediated effects of milk fat globule membrane on early-life gut microbiota

During infancy, the gastrointestinal microbiota develops under the influence of many factors, such as environmental exposures, mode of delivery, antibiotic use, and diet (112, 113, 117). The composition and maturation of the gut microbiota are influenced by MFGM, as evidenced by reduced Escherichia coli and increased Bifidobacterium levels in the stools of infants fed a ganglioside-supplemented formula, suggesting that MFGM plays a modulatory role in shaping gut microbiota during early life (118). MFGM was found to interact specifically with probiotics such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. Thereby increased the resistance of probiotics to bile salts (98, 119). MFGM increased Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG survival during transit through the murine gastrointestinal tract (98). MFGM also enabled probiotics to adhere more efficiently to the intestinal epithelium. Strain-specific increased adhesion of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium was observed, along with a significant reduction in pathogen colonization. Compared to the control group, supplementation with MFGs under culture conditions resulted in a more diverse mucin–phospholipid milieu, promoting enhanced probiotic adhesion to the intestinal epithelium (99, 120). The early-life gut forms a dynamic microbial community. In which MFGM components—phospholipids, gangliosides, and glycoproteins—provide nutrients and attachment sites for beneficial bacteria such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium.

These components also block binding sites and modulate immune responses, thereby limiting the growth of harmful bacteria. Through these actions, MFGM directly promotes a stable, healthy gut microbiome early in life. These data indicate that MFGM may influence early microbial ecosystems by fostering beneficial taxa and restricting pathogen colonization, thereby establishing a microbial environment conducive to immunological and metabolic development throughout infancy.

5.1. In vitro evidence

In the in vitro study conducted by Raz et al., experiments with Bacillus subtilis demonstrated that MFG size is a determining factor in bacterial behavior. Small MFGs (~2.3 μm) increased bacterial growth by approximately 100-fold, while large MFGs (~7 μm) promoted the formation of complex biofilm structures, particularly by inducing the expression of the tapA operon (among the most important indicators of biofilm formation) (121). Yadav et al. isolated two probiotic strains, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum MRK3 and Limosilactobacillus fermentum MK1, from infant feces and investigated the effect of human milk MFGM on these probiotics. In an in vitro infant digestion model involving Lactiplantibacillus plantarum MRK3 and human milk MFGM, probiotic survival was increased, and MRK3 was physically integrated into the human milk MFGM matrix during digestion. Combining human milk MFGM and the probiotic MRK3 strain increased cell viability by preventing H2O2-induced / E. coli-induced toxic effects in Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells. This study demonstrates that human milk MFGM may support the integrity and survival of probiotic bacteria as they are transported to the intestines, thanks to its membrane matrix and phospholipids (122). MFGM may affect the initial formation of microbial communities in the infant gut by improving probiotic survival and epithelial adherence. Alterations in microbiota may subsequently influence the formation of the intestinal barrier, immunological signaling pathways, and metabolic activities throughout early development.

5.2. Preclinical animal evidence

In various animal models and human studies, MFGM supplementation has been shown to provide systemic benefits. These include increased antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, CAT, GSH-Px), decreased inflammatory markers (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, LPS), and strengthened intestinal barrier integrity (increased tight junction proteins, decreased LPS levels) (Supplementary Table 1) (104, 105, 115, 123). At the microbiota level, the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria, including probiotic species such as Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Akkermansia, and Faecalibaculum, increases, while potential pathogens (such as Escherichia-Shigella and Enterococcus) decrease, supporting microbial balance. Furthermore, in animals and human infants receiving MFGM supplements, the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio is regulated, SCFA production is increased, and intestinal microbiota diversity is positively affected (104, 114–116, 123, 124). The results of the studies can be summarized under three main headings: the effects of MFGM on lipid metabolism (1, 114, 115), microbiota modulation (114, 115, 124), and intestinal barrier function and immune effects (104, 105, 115). Current data suggest that MFGM components regulate gut microbiota composition and metabolic activity. These changes then affect intestinal barrier integrity, immune signaling pathways, and overall metabolic responses. The effects of MFGM on microbiota may shape larger developmental outcomes, such as immune system maturation, intestinal function, and possibly neurodevelopment in early life.

5.3. Human clinical evidence

In human infants, have been shown that MFGM-containing formulas increase microbiota diversity, particularly promoting the proliferation of beneficial species such as Bifidobacterium bifidum and Akkermansia (125). These findings suggest that MFGM may have potential beneficial effects on the healthy development of early-life microbiota and support immune and metabolic functions. However, the limited number of clinical studies, heterogeneous doses, combined interventions, small and variable sample sizes, different intervention durations, and heterogeneous study designs restrict the generalizability of these findings (in vivo neonatal rodent or sows models and randomized controlled human infant studies with control groups receiving standard formula, breast milk, or emulsions). Consequently, standardized, controlled, and comprehensive studies are needed to more accurately assess the effects of MFGM. Current evidence suggests that the MFGM may affect infant health by altering gut bacteria. Its active components seem to help early bacterial growth, strengthen the gut lining, and support immune system development in infants. More well-designed studies are needed to learn how much these bacteria-related effects impact growth, metabolism, and brain development.

6. Microbiota-mediated health benefits of milk fat globule membrane

6.1. Microbiota-related immune and intestinal growth

Dietary factors and microbial colonization during infancy shape the mucosal immune system, which supports health in later life (126). The capacity of MFGM to modulate microbiota has important implications, especially on the development of the immune system, intestinal mucosal barrier, and gastrointestinal tract (48, 124, 127). These data indicate that MFGM may affect immune and intestinal development through microbiota-linked pathways. Its bioactive components help beneficial microbes colonize the gut and regulate host–microbe interactions. These actions may support mucosal immune responses and strengthen the intestinal barrier in early life. Proteomic and phosphoproteomic analyses of proteins isolated from MFGM revealed that these structures are actively involved in various signaling pathways regulating immune responses. In the study, proteins showing changes in expression and phosphorylation levels based on comparative proteomic and phosphoproteomic analyses include perilipin-2, xanthine dehydrogenase/oxidase, glycosylation-dependent cell adhesion molecule 1, fatty acid synthase, clusterin, heat shock protein β-1, β-casein, αS1-casein, and αS2-casein, fatty acid synthase, and sodium/nucleoside cotransporter. The majority of MFGM proteins found in bovine colostrum and mature milk are associated with cell adhesion and innate immune responses, including Fc gamma R-mediated phagocytosis, African trypanosomiasis, B cell receptor signaling pathways, Staphylococcus aureus infection, and Yersinia infection (128). In a study conducted by Christensen et al. on healthy term infants, the effects of infant formula enriched with bovine milk-derived MFGM on the gut microbiota, short-chain fatty acids, and immune biomarkers were investigated. In infants fed the bovine MFGM-enriched formula, the composition and diversity of the fecal microbiota were positively affected compared to those fed standard formula, and an increase in the levels of short-chain fatty acids was observed. Additionally, it was noted that MFGM supplementation may have positive regulatory effects on gastrointestinal tolerance and intestinal immune function (116). In the study by Ortega-Anaya et al., Lactobacillus interacted directly with phospholipids from the MFGM, increasing the bacterial cell surface electronegativity either by adsorption onto the cell envelope or by incorporating into the phospholipid molecules in the cell (97). MFGM supplementation supported normal neonatal intestinal development, restored microbiota composition closer to a healthy state, and strengthened the mucosal barrier (129, 130). Regarding intestinal development, MFGM supplementation protected the intestinal mucosa in neonatal and adult animals, decreased apoptosis rates, and increased the activity of epithelial defense genes such as MUC1, MUC2, and the Reg3 gene family. Especially in models of intestinal damage such as short bowel syndrome and necrotizing enterocolitis, MFGM contributed to the reconstruction of the intestinal epithelium (124, 129–134) (Supplementary Table 2). It also contributed to a reduced incidence of infection (135). In the study conducted by Bhinder et al., it was demonstrated that intestinal development normalized in rat pups fed MFGM-supplemented formula, intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and tight junction protein development increased, and the microbiota became more similar to that of breastfed pups. Furthermore, MFGM provided protection against colitis associated with intrarectal exposure to Clostridioides difficile toxins in rats (129).

MFGM supplementation suppressed proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6), elevated anti-inflammatory IL-10, and increased gene expression of tight junction proteins such as claudin-1, occludin, and ZO-1, which support the barrier integrity of the intestine, particularly in inflammation-induced models involving LPS or DSS (124, 129–134, 136). In MFGM-fed groups, intestinal permeability was reduced, and relative mRNA expression levels of immune-related genes (TLR2, TLR4, NLRP3, and Caspase-1) were suppressed in the ileum (131, 134). At the same time, MFGM has beneficial effects on neonatal rats with NEC by suppressing inflammation via the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway. TLR4 is an important component of the inflammatory response in NEC, and MFGM reduced the ileal expression of TLR4, mRNA expression of IL-1β, IL-6, iNOS, and TNF-α in rats with NEC. To further elucidate the inflammatory mechanism of MFGM, MFGM treatment in LPS-stimulated intestinal epithelial cells-6 partially inhibited the increase in TLR4, MyD88, and p-NF-κBp65 protein levels and reduced the nuclear translocation of NF-κBp65 (61). These findings indicate that MFGM modulates the inflammatory response at the protein level and limits NF-κB-mediated gene transcription. It is conceivable that MFGM may protect intestinal integrity by modulating inflammatory signaling at both the protein expression and transcriptional levels (133). The decrease in mRNA levels for TLR2 and TLR4 may be consistent with the suppression of the TLR4–MyD88–NF-κB pathway, as pathway activity depends not only on transcript abundance but also on the receptor’s surface protein level, the activity of adapter proteins (e.g., MyD88), the phosphorylation of NF-κB p65, and its translocation to the nucleus (131, 133). Figure 3 provides a general overview of the mechanism by which MFGM affects intestinal inflammation and barrier integrity.

Figure 3.

Infographic illustrates gut microbiota interacting with intestinal cells and shows how MFGM inhibits TLR4 signaling and reduces proinflammatory cytokines, enhances anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, and increases tight junction proteins, promoting reduced intestinal inflammation and protecting intestinal integrity.

Proposed mechanisms underlying the protective effects of milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) on intestinal inflammation and barrier integrity (↑: increase, ↓: decrease). Created using Canva.

In summary, it has been demonstrated that MFGM can reduce intestinal inflammation by modulating the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway. It has been observed that MFGM reduces TLR4 activation, suppresses MyD88-dependent signaling, inhibits NF-κB phosphorylation and nuclear translocation, and consequently reduces the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the reduction in TLR2 and TLR4 mRNA levels. Additionally, it has been suggested that MFGM may enhance intestinal barrier integrity by increasing the expression of tight junction proteins such as occludin, claudin-1, and ZO-1. The findings also suggest that MFGM may influence brain development through the microbiota–gut–brain axis, via changes in the gut microbiota that affect the immune system, metabolism, and early brain development.

6.2. Microbiota–gut–brain axis and neurodevelopment

As part of this work, a structured literature search was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus using predefined keyword groups (e.g., “infant,” “MFGM,” “MFGM-related compounds,” “neurodevelopment,” “cognitive function,” “microbiota,” “clinical study,” and “preclinical study”). The retrieved publications were screened and classified according to study type and area of focus. Among the relevant literature, three original clinical studies focusing on microbiota and neurodevelopment were found (39, 107, 108), along with two original preclinical investigations (106, 110), which are presented in Supplementary Table 3. Several studies in this field have investigated the effects of MFGM on neurodevelopment, behavior, and cognitive development (38, 137–139), as well as on the gut microbiota (109, 125). The accumulating data indicate that the impact of MFGM on neurodevelopment may be partially mediated by interactions within the microbiota–gut–brain axis. Alterations in microbial composition and metabolites may affect immunological signaling, metabolic pathways, and brain development in early life.

Preclinical studies have been designed using controlled animal models to investigate the potential effects of MFGM and its associated components on neurodevelopmental processes. In this area, some studies have focused explicitly on the effects of MFGM on either neurodevelopment or the gut microbiota (110, 111). In their preclinical study, Mudd et al. (110) investigated the effects of a diet enriched with prebiotics, milk fat globule membrane, and lactoferrin in piglets from postnatal day 2 to 31. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessments between days 21 and 31 revealed no significant differences in total brain volume or the relative volumes of 19 brain regions compared to controls (110). Nieto-Ruiz et al. (111) evaluated infants from the COGNIS randomized controlled trial who were fed breast milk, standard formula, or an MFGM- and LC-PUFA-enriched formula for 18 months. The enriched formula group showed favorable growth outcomes and significant improvements in cortical visual evoked potentials, suggesting enhanced visual cortex development linked to early nutritional intervention (111). This COGNIS RCT indicated that an enriched formula did not hinder growth or early general neurodevelopment, and, for visual cortical maturation, it could more closely resemble breast milk compared with standard formula. While breast milk was the optimal source of nourishment, formula enriched with bioactive components may help close the neurodevelopmental gap in formula-fed infants. However, because the formula contained multiple bioactive components, including MFGM and LC-PUFAs, the specific contribution of MFGM to these effects cannot be clearly distinguished.

In the study by Zhao et al. (n = 44), researchers compared the effects of breastfeeding, standard formula, and a fortified formula enriched with prebiotics, MFGM, and lactoferrin on gut microbiota composition at one month of age. Alpha-diversity (Simpson and Shannon indices) was highest in the breastfed group, while beta-diversity analyses showed distinct microbial profiles between breastfed and formula-fed infants. Notably, Bifidobacterium abundance was significantly higher in the breastfed group (29.89%) compared to the common (2.66%) and fortified formula groups (2.27%). Key MFGM components—lactadherin, sialic acid, and phospholipids—were positively associated with Bifidobacterium levels and inversely associated with potentially pathogenic genera such as Veillonella and Escherichia/Shigella. Gene enrichment analysis identified upregulation of beneficial metabolic pathways in Bifidobacterium. These findings suggest that MFGM components may contribute to a more favorable gut microbiota profile in early infancy, although they may not fully replicate the effects of breastfeeding (106). Two studies examined how MFGM supplementation affects infant gut microbiota and metabolomic profiles. MFGM-containing formulas were associated with reduced amino acid metabolites, indicating altered microbial fermentation (109). Additionally, an increase in Bacteroides species was observed (125), though metabolomic changes did not reach statistical significance after correction (109, 125).

Notably, four long-term clinical studies have investigated the impact of MFGM on neurodevelopment and cognitive and behavioral outcomes (38, 137–139). In the COGNIS study series, the development of children who were fed breast milk, standard formula, or a formula enriched with MFGM, LC-PUFAs, and synbiotics during the first 18 months of life was evaluated at ages 2.5 and 4 years (137, 138). Among infants fed the enriched formula for 18 months, follow-up assessments up to 2.5 years of age revealed reduced behavioral problems, particularly improvements in affective and externalizing behaviors. The results indicated that this group was comparable to breastfed children in terms of behavioral outcomes. In a subsequent analysis evaluating longer-term effects, significant improvements in language development were observed at age 4, suggesting that MFGM may contribute positively to neurodevelopmental processes (138). The investigations indicated that a formula with MFGM, LC-PUFA, and synbiotics was associated with fewer behavioral problems up to 2.5 years of age and enhanced language development at 4 years compared with a conventional formula. The enhanced formula more closely resembled breast milk in numerous respects. Nonetheless, due to the intervention including multiple bioactive components, the observed advantages are probably attributable to their synergistic effects rather than to MFGM in isolation. Moreover, variables including maternal IQ, education, and socioeconomic status may potentially affect neurodevelopmental outcomes. Consequently, the current evidence does not permit precise isolation of the specific contribution of MFGM to these outcomes.

In another study series, infants fed a formula containing MFGM and LC-PUFAs for 12 months showed increased total brain volume and improved white matter integrity as assessed by MRI. These findings were interpreted as a positive contribution to early brain development (139). In the same cohort, which was followed up to 6.5 years of age, MFGM supplementation was suggested to enhance myelination and support the development of early cognitive skills (38).

Formulas enriched with MFGM appear to confer certain neurodevelopmental advantages in infancy and early childhood when compared to standard formulas. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported improvements in specific neurocognitive domains in infants fed MFGM-fortified formulas. For instance, Nieto-Ruiz et al. (39) demonstrated that children in the enriched formula group showed higher IQ and vocabulary scores at age 6 compared to the breastfed group, along with greater cortical thickness and parietal lobe volume (39). These neuroanatomical findings were associated with improved neuropsychological test outcomes. Similarly, Chen et al. (108) reported that by 4 months, infants in the MFGM-fortified formula group achieved motor development scores comparable to breastfed peers, and both groups outperformed the standard formula group (108). In addition to behavioral and cognitive outcomes, MRI-based assessments in piglet models (110) showed no significant differences in relative brain volume, yet provided a valuable translational perspective, emphasizing the complexity of neurodevelopmental metrics beyond gross brain morphology. Furthermore, a longitudinal RCT showed that infants with faster microbial maturation trajectories—promoted by enriched formula—achieved higher cognitive and expressive language scores at 12 months, although these differences leveled off by age 4 (107). Collectively, these findings suggest that MFGM may support early-life brain development through both direct nutritional mechanisms and gut–brain axis modulation. These observations support a framework in which bioactive components derived from MFGM interact with intestinal microbiota, influencing microbial metabolites, immune signaling pathways, and neural development, thus contributing to cognitive and behavioral outcomes in early childhood.

Despite promising findings, studies investigating the neurodevelopmental impact of MFGM-enriched formulas exhibit several methodological and interpretative limitations. First, the heterogeneity in neurodevelopmental assessment tools—ranging from early motor scores to advanced cognitive testing and MRI-based measures—limits comparability across studies. For example, while Chen et al. (108) used short-term developmental scales within the first 6 months, Nieto-Ruiz et al. (39) employed neuroimaging and cognitive tests at age 6, making longitudinal synthesis challenging. Moreover, variations in intervention components (e.g., MFGM combined with LC-PUFAs, synbiotics, or OPO) make it difficult to isolate the specific effect of MFGM on brain development. Many studies also lack baseline assessments of neurodevelopment, limiting causal interpretation. Finally, sample sizes in some trials were relatively small, and few accounted for confounding variables such as parental education, home environment, or early stimulation, which are critical determinants of neurocognitive outcomes.

6.3. Growth and metabolic development associated with microbiota

The effects of MFGM supplementation on infant growth parameters have generally been comparable to those of standard formula and breastfeeding, with some favorable trends. In a large-scale RCT, Li et al. (132) found no significant differences in weight or length gain among infants receiving MFGM- or probiotic-enriched formulas compared with those receiving standard formulas (140). However, breastfed infants exhibited greater early weight gain until approximately four months of age. Notably, from 5 to 12 months, infants fed the F19 formula showed a slight but statistically significant increase in weight gain relative to the breastfed group. In another study, Best et al. (135) demonstrated that MFGM-enriched formula enhanced fat-free mass and total body volume compared with breastfeeding, indicating a potential advantage in lean tissue accretion (135).

While Chen et al. (108) observed no significant group differences in anthropometric outcomes such as head circumference, height, and weight, enriched formula-fed infants exhibited faster overall growth trends in the early months (108). Additionally, selected gut microbial genera (e.g., Sutterella, Methanobrevibacter) were linked to head circumference and bone mineral density, suggesting potential indirect effects of gut modulation on physical development. These findings suggest that gut bacteria may help link MFGM intake to infant growth and metabolism. MFGM-induced changes in gut microbial composition and fermentation activity may affect nutrient intake, metabolic signaling, and growth-related physiological processes in growing infants. These findings collectively imply that while MFGM may not markedly alter growth trajectories, it contributes to qualitative improvements in body composition and functional developmental markers. In this randomized controlled trial (n = 108), children who received MFGM-, LC-PUFA-, and synbiotic-enriched formula from birth to 18 months were assessed at six years of age alongside standard formula-fed and breastfed peers. While no group differences were found in growth metrics or basic language comprehension, children in the enriched formula group showed higher IQ and vocabulary scores than the breastfed group, and better attention and impulse control than both other groups. MRI results revealed greater parietal lobe volume and increased cortical thickness—particularly in the left occipitotemporal sulcus—in both the enriched formula and breastfed groups, which correlated with better neurocognitive performance (39). These findings suggest that early-life consumption of enriched formulas may lead to measurable structural and functional enhancements in brain development that persist in childhood.

Research exploring the role of MFGM in supporting infant growth and physical development is constrained by several critical gaps. Most notably, anthropometric outcomes such as weight, length, and head circumference have shown minimal or inconsistent differences between enriched and standard formulas, and the clinical significance of observed differences is often unclear. While some studies have incorporated body composition analyses, most rely on basic growth metrics without considering functional development markers such as bone density or lean mass accretion over time. Furthermore, many trials do not extend follow-up beyond the first year of life, leaving the long-term impact of MFGM on growth trajectories poorly understood. The lack of stratified analyses by sex, birth weight, or prematurity status also limits applicability to high-risk subgroups. In addition, inter-study variability in formula composition and energy density further complicates interpretation, as differences in caloric intake may confound the observed growth effects.

7. Safety of MFGM supplementation

Although the addition of MFGM supplementation to infant nutrition has been shown to have positive biological and developmental effects, further research is needed on certain safety issues before it can be widely used in infant formulas. Current studies indicate that bovine-derived MFGM is generally well tolerated and does not have an adverse effect on infant growth or gastrointestinal tolerance in randomized controlled trials (19, 116, 141). Although there are few studies on the safety and tolerability of formulas enriched with MFGM, these studies have emphasized that they are safe and well-tolerated and exhibit effects like those of standard formulas (140, 142, 143). However, depending on the source of milk used in the composition of MFGM preparations, as well as the extraction method and processing technologies, significant variations in the content of phospholipids, gangliosides, and membrane proteins may be observed. These factors make it difficult to ensure standardization across studies and limit the comparability of biological activity results (8, 92, 144) (Supplementary Table 4). Another important consideration is that structural changes resulting from processing can affect the activity of MFGM. High-temperature treatments, homogenization, and drying processes can lead to denaturation of membrane proteins and disruption of the structural integrity of bioactive lipids (46, 145–148). Furthermore, given the presence of bovine-derived protein components, the potential for allergenicity cannot be completely ruled out. MFGM has a complex protein structure and contains various protein components; therefore, it has been noted that protein-related immunological effects must be carefully evaluated (149–153). Another important consideration is the lack of standardized international recommendations regarding the optimal dose and composition of MFGM in infant formulas (41, 154, 155). Multi-component formulations containing LC-PUFAs, lactoferrin, or synbiotics in addition to MFGM have been used; this limits the ability to observe the effect of MFGM alone (39, 107, 125). Future studies should focus on standardized production methods, quality control, long-term safety monitoring, and mechanistic evaluation of isolated MFGM fractions to support evidence-based practice in infant nutrition.

8. Conclusion and future directions

This review synthesizes current evidence on the role of the MFGM in infant nutrition. Evidence links MFGM, alone or with other bioactive components, to improvements in infant brain development, cognitive outcomes, gut microbiota balance, and immune maturation. However, studies often do not isolate the unique impact of MFGM alone, making its specific role unclear.

The existing evidence has many limitations. In many clinical studies, MFGM is combined with other compounds, such as LC-PUFAs, synbiotics, or lactoferrin. This makes it hard to see what benefits come from MFGM alone. There is considerable variability across studies in intervention duration, participant demographics, and formula composition. Dosage details are difficult to interpret because MFGM-containing substances are part of age-adjusted formulas rather than given separately. Moreover, MFGM supplementation is predominantly found in specific or premium infant formulae, introducing diversity to the existing data. Collectively, these limitations constrain the capacity to ascertain solid conclusions about the exact role of MFGM in infant health outcomes.

Randomized controlled trials with subsequent follow-up have begun to address these questions. A recent assessment discovered just seven original papers, comprising five randomized controlled trials, underscoring the paucity of clinical data now available. While current research indicates that MFGM-containing formulas may benefit certain aspects of infant health, the extent and causes of these effects remain unclear. Future research needs to emphasize meticulously designed, adequately powered randomized controlled trials using standardized formulations and explicitly specified intervention regimens. It is essential to directly examine MFGM’s independent effects by testing treatments where MFGM is given alone, not with other bioactive components. This approach clarifies MFGM’s specific biological functions and informs evidence-based recommendations for infant nutrition.

Glossary

Glossary

ADPH

Adipophilin

BTN

Butyrophilin

CD36

Cluster of Differentiation 36

DAG

Diacylglycerol

ER

Endoplasmic Reticulum

FABP

Fatty Acid Binding Protein

FFA

Free Fatty Acid

MAG

Monoacylglycerol

MFG

Milk Fat Globules

MFGM

Milk Fat Globule Membrane

MUC

Mucin

PC

Phosphatidylcholine

PE

Phosphatidylethanolamine

PAS 6/7

Periodic Acid Schiff 6/7

PI

Phosphatidylinositol

PLs

Phospholipids

PP3

Proteose Peptone 3

PS

Phosphatidylserine

RCT

Randomized Controlled Trial

TAG

Triacylglycerol

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Footnotes

Edited by: Yongbo Kang, Shanxi Medical University, China

Reviewed by: Meng Zhang, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, China

Ivan Meneses-Morales, Juárez University of the State of Durango, Mexico

Author contributions

EK: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization. EÇ: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Visualization. ÖC: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. OK: Writing – review & editing, Supervision. BR: Writing – original draft, Supervision. DA: Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author DA declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. The author(s) hereby confirm the utilization of generative artificial intelligence in the preparation of this article. Artificial intelligence tools, specifically Canva Pro and ChatGPT Plus, were employed to generate figures and facilitate grammatical review.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2026.1851487/full#supplementary-material

Table_1.DOCX (710.1KB, DOCX)
Table_2.DOCX (712.9KB, DOCX)
Table_3.DOCX (688KB, DOCX)
Table_4.DOCX (675.3KB, DOCX)

References

  • 1.Lee H, Slupsky CM, Heckmann AB, Christensen B, Peng Y, Li X, et al. Milk fat globule membrane as a modulator of infant metabolism and gut microbiota: a formula supplement narrowing the metabolic differences between breastfed and formula-fed infants. Mol Nutr Food Res. (2021) 65:e2000603. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.202000603, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stewart CJ, Ajami NJ, O'Brien JL, Hutchinson DS, Smith DP, Wong MC, et al. Temporal development of the gut microbiome in early childhood from the TEDDY study. Nature. (2018) 562:583–8. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0617-x, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baadu FA, Ahsan M, Hussain B, Hussain S, Malik H, Naqvi SS, et al. Microbiome imbalance and pediatric type 1 diabetes mellitus: an updated systematic review of gut dysbiosis evidence. Cureus. (2025) 17:e89279. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gallant R, Reza S, Wiemels J, Greaves M. Microbiome and pediatric leukemia, diabetes, and allergies: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. (2025) 20:e0324167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324167, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mostafavi Abdolmaleky H, Zhou J-R. Gut microbiota dysbiosis, oxidative stress, inflammation, and epigenetic alterations in metabolic diseases. Antioxidants. (2024) 13:985. doi: 10.3390/antiox13080985, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ma G, Shi Y, Meng L, Fan H, Tang X, Luo H, et al. Factors affecting the early establishment of neonatal intestinal flora and its intervention measures. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2023) 13:1295111. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1295111, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schipper L, van Dijk G, van der Beek EM. Milk lipid composition and structure: the relevance for infant brain development. OCL-Oilseeds Fats Crops Lipids. (2020) 27:5. doi: 10.1051/ocl/2020001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fontecha J, Brink L, Wu S, Pouliot Y, Visioli F, Jiménez-Flores R. Sources, production, and clinical treatments of milk fat globule membrane for infant nutrition and well-being. Nutrients. (2020) 12:1607. doi: 10.3390/nu12061607, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brink LR, Lönnerdal B. Milk fat globule membrane: the role of its various components in infant health and development. J Nutr Biochem. (2020) 85:108465. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2020.108465, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ortega-Anaya J, Jiménez-Flores R. Symposium review: the relevance of bovine milk phospholipids in human nutrition—evidence of the effect on infant gut and brain development. J Dairy Sci. (2019) 102:2738–48. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15342, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lu J, Liu L, Pang X, Zhang S, Jia Z, Ma C, et al. Comparative proteomics of milk fat globule membrane in goat colostrum and mature milk. Food Chem. (2016) 209:10–6. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.020, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Thum C, Roy NC, Everett DW, McNabb WC. Variation in milk fat globule size and composition: a source of bioactives for human health. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2023) 63:87–113. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1944049, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pan Y, Liu L, Tian S, Li X, Hussain M, Li C, et al. Comparative analysis of interfacial composition and structure of fat globules in human milk and infant formulas. Food Hydrocoll. (2022) 107290:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107290 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Thomassen GGM, Abrahamse E, Mischke M, Becker M, Bartke N, Knol J, et al. In vitro gastrointestinal lipid handling and bioaccessibility rate of infant formula with large phospholipid-coated lipid droplets are different from those of standard formula and closer to human milk. Food Hydrocoll. (2024) 110336:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.110336 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pan Y, Liu S, Li J, Hussain M, Bora AFM, Li X, et al. Regulating the lipid droplet interface based on milk fat globule membrane and milk proteins to improve lipid digestion of model infant formula emulsion. Food Hydrocoll. (2024) 109187. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109187 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nie C, Zhao Y, Wang X, Li Y, Fang B, Wang R, et al. Structure, biological functions, separation, properties, and potential applications of milk fat globule membrane (MFGM): a review. Nutrients. (2024) 16:587. doi: 10.3390/nu16050587, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kosmerl E, Miller C, Jiménez-Flores R. Preventative effects of Milk fat globule membrane ingredients on DSS-induced mucosal injury in intestinal epithelial cells. Nutrients. (2024) 16:954. doi: 10.3390/nu16070954, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ren Q, Zhu X, Pan J, Li K, Zhou Y, Lyu Y, et al. A combination of phospholipids and long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids supports neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Front Nutr. (2024) 11:1358651. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1358651, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Thongseiratch T, Kittisakmontri K, Chandeying N. Bovine milk fat globule membrane supplementation and neurocognitive development: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. (2024) 16:2374. doi: 10.3390/nu16142374, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wilmot L, Miller C, Patil I, Kelly AL, Jimenez-Flores R. Dairy foods: a matrix for human health and precision nutrition—the relevance of a potential bioactive ingredient; the milk fat globule membrane. J Dairy Sci. (2025) 108:3109–34. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-25412, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Luque-Uría Á, Calvo MV, Visioli F, Fontecha J. Milk fat globule membrane and their polar lipids: reviewing preclinical and clinical trials on cognition. Food Funct. (2024) 15:6783–97. doi: 10.1039/D4FO00659C, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen N, Li L, Han Y, Chen Z. The role of gut microbiota in the modulation of pulmonary immune response to viral infection through the gut-lung Axis. J Inflamm Res. (2025) 18:11755–81. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S525880, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hu Y, Gao M, Chenghuang J, Bao R. Insights into the gut-liver axis: mechanisms and emerging therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Pharmacol. (2025) 16:1595853. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1595853, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mudaliar SB, Poojary SS, Bharath Prasad AS, Mazumder N. Probiotics and Paraprobiotics: effects on microbiota-gut-brain Axis and their consequent potential in neuropsychiatric therapy. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. (2024) 16:1440–64. doi: 10.1007/s12602-024-10214-6, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wasana WP, Waterland M, Everett DW, Thum C. Functional significance of probiotic bacterial interactions with Milk fat globules in a human host. Microorganisms. (2025) 13:223. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13020223, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang Y, Xie Z, Li H, Zhang G, Liu R, Han J, et al. Improvement in probiotic intestinal survival by electrospun milk fat globule membrane-pullulan nanofibers: fabrication and structural characterization. Food Chemistry: X. (2024) 23:101756. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101756, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wooding FP, Kinoshita M. Milk fat globule membrane: formation and transformation. J Dairy Res. (2023) 90:367–75. doi: 10.1017/S0022029923000742, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sun Y, Zhu B, Cong P, Li X, Liu L, Guo C, et al. Regulating fat globule structure of infant formula based on MFGM to promote lipid uptake by improving lipolysis. Food Hydrocoll. (2024) 155:110167. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.110167 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lalonde C, Kraft J, Zhao F-Q. Molecular aspects of milk lipid synthesis and secretion in mammary epithelial cells. Animal Nutriomics. (2024) 1:e15. doi: 10.1017/anr.2024.19 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Walter L, Narayana VK, Fry R, Logan A, Tull D, Leury B. Milk fat globule size development in the mammary epithelial cell: a potential role for ether phosphatidylethanolamine. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:12299. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69036-5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li Z, Cao Y, Fan X, Zhou H, Wang P, Zhang H, et al. The simulated in vitro infant gastrointestinal digestion of lipid droplets covered with milk fat globule membrane components: the role of interface layers. Food Res Int. (2025) 208:116272. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2025.116272, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Muthusamy D. "Milk fat globular membrane: composition, structure, isolation, technological significance and health benefits". In: Current Issues and Advances in the Dairy Industry. London: IntechOpen; (2022). doi: 10.5772/intechopen.106926 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Señoráns M, Gallo V, Calvo MV, Fontecha J. Lipidomic and proteomic profiling of the Milk fat globule membrane from different industrial by-products of the butter and butter oil manufacturing process. Foods. (2023) 12:750. doi: 10.3390/foods12040750, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.France TC, Kennedy E, O’Regan J, Goulding DA. Current perspectives on the use of milk fat globule membrane in infant milk formula. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2024) 65:5534–49. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2024.2417791, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kosmerl E, Rocha-Mendoza D, Ortega-Anaya J, Jiménez-Flores R, García-Cano I. Improving human health with milk fat globule membrane, lactic acid bacteria, and bifidobacteria. Microorganisms. (2021) 9:341. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9020341, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yao D, Ranadheera CS, Shen C, Wei W, Cheong LZ. Milk fat globule membrane: composition, production and its potential as encapsulant for bioactives and probiotics. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2024) 64:12336–51. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2023.2249992, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zuffa S, Lay C, Wimborne EA, Rodriguez AH, Wu Y, Nobrega FL, et al. Milk phospholipid-coated lipid droplets modulate the infant gut microbiota and metabolome influencing weight gain. Microbiome. (2025) 13:120. doi: 10.1186/s40168-025-02106-w, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Timby N, Adamsson M, Domellöf E, Grip T, Hernell O, Lönnerdal B, et al. Neurodevelopment and growth until 6.5 years of infants who consumed a low-energy, low-protein formula supplemented with bovine milk fat globule membranes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. (2021) 113:586–92. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa354, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nieto-Ruiz A, García-Santos JA, Verdejo-Román J, Diéguez E, Sepúlveda-Valbuena N, Herrmann F, et al. Infant formula supplemented with milk fat globule membrane, long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, and synbiotics is associated with neurocognitive function and brain structure of healthy children aged 6 years: the COGNIS study. Front Nutr. (2022) 9:820224. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.820224, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li B, Chen Q, Mu L, Liu S, Xiang F, Yang L, et al. Milk fat globule membrane regulates the physicochemical properties and surface composition of infant formula powders by improving the stability of the emulsion. Food Chem. (2024) 440:137522. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ambrożej D, Dumycz K, Dziechciarz P, Ruszczyński M. Milk fat globule membrane supplementation in children: systematic review with Meta-analysis. Nutrients. (2021) 13:13. doi: 10.3390/nu13030714, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Davies N, Frampton C, Fuad M, Slykerman R. The effect of supplementation with milk fat globule membranes on psychological health: a randomized clinical trial in healthy adults with moderate stress. J Funct Foods. (2023) 105:105585. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2023.105585 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hussain G, Wang J, Rasul A, Anwar H, Imran A, Qasim M, et al. Role of cholesterol and sphingolipids in brain development and neurological diseases. Lipids Health Dis. (2019) 18:26. doi: 10.1186/s12944-019-0965-z, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Quinville B, Deschenes N, Ryckman A, Walia J. A comprehensive review: sphingolipid metabolism and implications of disruption in sphingolipid homeostasis. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:5793. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115793, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Brown EM, Clardy J, Xavier R. Gut microbiome lipid metabolism and its impact on host physiology. Cell Host Microbe. (2023) 31:173–86. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2023.01.009, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ozturk G, Paviani B, Rai R, Robinson RC, Durham SD, Baller MI, et al. Investigating milk fat globule structure, size, and functionality after thermal processing and homogenization of human milk. Foods. (2024) 13:1242. doi: 10.3390/foods13081242, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cavaletto M, Givonetti A, Cattaneo C. The immunological role of milk fat globule membrane. Nutrients. (2022) 14:4574. doi: 10.3390/nu14214574, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Martínez-Sánchez V, Fontecha J, Pérez-Gálvez A. Milk fat globule membrane: production, digestion, and health benefits evaluated through in vitro models. PharmaNutrition. (2024) 30:100418. doi: 10.1016/j.phanu.2024.100418 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pan J, Chen M, Li N, Han R, Yang Y, Zheng N, et al. Bioactive functions of lipids in the Milk fat globule membrane: a comprehensive review. Foods. (2023) 12:3755. doi: 10.3390/foods12203755, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.da Silva RC, Colleran HL, Ibrahim SA. Milk fat globule membrane in infant nutrition: a dairy industry perspective. J Dairy Res. (2021) 88:105–16. doi: 10.1017/S0022029921000224, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Deoni SCL, Beauchemin J, D'Sa V. Enhanced brain myelination and cognitive development in young children associated with milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) intake: a temporal cohort study. Brain Struct Funct. (2025) 230:52. doi: 10.1007/s00429-025-02907-7, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sánchez C, Franco L, Regal P, Lamas A, Cepeda A, Fente C. Breast milk: a source of functional compounds with potential application in nutrition and therapy. Nutrients. (2021) 13:1026. doi: 10.3390/nu13031026, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Demmelmair H, Koletzko B. Lipids in human milk. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2018) 32:57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2017.11.002, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Demmelmair H, Uhl O, Zhou SJ, Makrides M, Gibson RA, Prosser C, et al. Plasma sphingomyelins and carnitine esters of infants consuming whole goat or cow Milk-based infant formulas or human Milk. J Nutr. (2024) 154:1781–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.04.020, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang S, De Souza C, Ramachandran M, Luo Y, Zhang Y, Yi H, et al. Lipidomics insight on differences between human MFGM and dietary-derived lipids. Food Chem. (2023) 422:136236. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136236, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Algarín C, Murguia-Peniche T, Reyes S, Wu SS, Wampler JL, Peirano P. Effects of infant feeding type on auditory event-related potentials at 24 months of age. Pediatr Res. (2024) 98:645–53. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03641-2, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Calvo MV, Kohen VL, Díaz-Mardomingo C, García-Herranz S, Baliyan S, Tomé-Carneiro J, et al. Milk fat globule membrane-enriched milk improves episodic memory: a randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in older adults. J Funct Foods. (2023) 111:105849. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2023.105849 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yang F, Chen G. The nutritional functions of dietary sphingomyelin and its applications in food. Front Nutr. (2022) 9:1002574. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1002574, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Qin X-Y, Pan J, Liu Y-N, Luo H-M, Yang F. The protective effect of dietary sphingomyelin supplementation against impaired lipid metabolism in obese mice: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Food Nutr Health. (2025) 2:13. doi: 10.1007/s44403-025-00021-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Guerin J, Burgain J, Gomand F, Scher J, Gaiani C. Milk fat globule membrane glycoproteins: valuable ingredients for lactic acid bacteria encapsulation? Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2019) 59:639–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Martin Carli JF, Dzieciatkowska M, Hernandez TL, Monks J, McManaman JL. Comparative proteomic analysis of human milk fat globules and paired membranes and mouse milk fat globules identifies core cellular systems contributing to mammary lipid trafficking and secretion. Front Mol Biosci. (2023) 10:1259047. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1259047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sari RN, Pan J, Zhang W, Li Y, Zhu H, Pang X, et al. Comparative proteomics of human milk from eight cities in China during six months of lactation in the Chinese human milk project study. Front Nutr. (2021) 8:682429. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.682429, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wang C, Zhao R, Liu X, Lu Y, Cheng J, Jiang S, et al. Proteomic characterization and comparison of milk fat globule membrane proteins collected from two ethnic groups of women in China using DIA technique. Food Biosci. (2022) 50:102192. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.102192 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Yadav M, Kapoor A, Verma A, Ambatipudi K. Functional significance of different milk constituents in modulating the gut microbiome and infant health. J Agric Food Chem. (2022) 70:3929–47. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c00335, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Manoni M, Cattaneo D, Mazzoleni S, Giromini C, Baldi A, Pinotti L. Milk fat globule membrane proteome and micronutrients in the milk lipid fraction: insights into milk bioactive compounds. Dairy. (2021) 2:202–17. doi: 10.3390/dairy2020018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wang Y, Wu J, Zhang H, Yang X, Gu R, Liu Y, et al. Comprehensive review of milk fat globule membrane proteins across mammals and lactation periods in health and disease. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2025) 65:4435–4456. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2024.2387763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Almeida CC, Mendonça Pereira BF, Leandro KC, Costa MP, Spisso BF, Conte-Junior CA. Bioactive compounds in infant formula and their effects on infant nutrition and health: a systematic literature review. Int J Food Sci. (2021) 2021:1–31. doi: 10.1155/2021/8850080, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Spitsberg VL. Invited review: bovine milk fat globule membrane as a potential nutraceutical. J Dairy Sci. (2005) 88:2289–94. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72906-4, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Valk-Weeber RL, Nichols K, Dijkhuizen L, Bijl E, van Leeuwen SS. Variations in N-linked glycosylation of glycosylation-dependent cell adhesion molecule 1 (GlyCAM-1) whey protein: Intercow differences and dietary effects. J Dairy Sci. (2021) 104:5056–68. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19297, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wilmot L, Miller C, Patil I, Kelly AL, Jimenez-Flores R. The relevance of a potential bioactive ingredient: the milk fat globule membrane. J Dairy Sci. (2025) 108:3109–3134. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-25412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lai X, Yu Y, Xian W, Ye F, Ju X, Luo Y, et al. Inhibition of SAR S-CoV-2 infection and replication by lactoferrin, MUC1 and α-lactalbumin identified in human breastmilk. bioRxiv. (2021). doi: 10.1101/2021.10.29.466402 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Guo Y, Tao J, Li Y, Feng Y, Ju H, Wang Z, et al. Quantitative localized analysis reveals distinct exosomal protein-specific glycosignatures: implications in cancer cell subtyping, exosome biogenesis, and function. J Am Chem Soc. (2020) 142:7404–12. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b12182, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Lee H, Padhi E, Hasegawa Y, Larke J, Parenti M, Wang A, et al. Compositional dynamics of the milk fat globule and its role in infant development. Front Pediatr. (2018) 6:313. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00313, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Galani A, Goulding DA, O'Regan J. An absolute quantification method for selected MFGM proteins in infant formula using targeted proteomics. Food Chem. (2025) 463:141446. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141446, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Han L, Zhang M, Xing Z, Coleman DN, Liang Y, Loor JJ, et al. Knockout of butyrophilin subfamily 1 member A1 (BTN1A1) alters lipid droplet formation and phospholipid composition in bovine mammary epithelial cells. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. (2020) 11:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s40104-020-00479-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Pan Y, Liu S, Li J, Hussain M, Bora AFM, Li X, et al. Regulating the lipid droplet interface based on milk fat globule membrane and milk proteins to improve lipid digestion of model infant formula emulsion. Food Hydrocoll. (2024) 146:109187. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109187 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zhao Y, Liu L, Ma Q, Wang Y, Li X, Zhang X, et al. Milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) phospholipid-whey protein interaction characterization and its effect on physicochemical, interfacial properties and evaluation of in vitro digestion of emulsions-inspired by the MFGM. Food Hydrocoll. (2024) 155:110173. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.110173 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Yan G, Li Y, Wang S, Li Y, Li Y, Zhang L. Natural colloids in bioemulsions: a review of the production, stabilization and processing of milk fat globules. Food Rev Int. (2025) 41:1608–29. doi: 10.1080/87559129.2025.2450272 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ma Z, Gong H, Liu B, Mao X. The compositions of milk fat globule membrane determine the interfacial behavior, digestive properties, and bioactivities: natural versus processed forms. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2024) 154:104786. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104786 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Griseti E, Bello AA, Bieth E, Sabbagh B, Iacovoni JS, Bigay J, et al. Molecular mechanisms of perilipin protein function in lipid droplet metabolism. FEBS Lett. (2024) 598:1170–98. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.14792, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Novakovic P, Huang YY, Lockerbie B, Shahriar F, Kelly J, Gordon JR, et al. Identification of Escherichia coli F4ac-binding proteins in porcine milk fat globule membrane. Can J Vet Res. (2015) 79:120–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Manoni M, Di Lorenzo C, Ottoboni M, Tretola M, Pinotti L. Comparative proteomics of milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) proteome across species and lactation stages and the potentials of MFGM fractions in infant formula preparation. Foods. (2020) 9:1251. doi: 10.3390/foods9091251, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Thum C, Wall C, Day L, Szeto IM, Li F, Yan Y, et al. Changes in human milk fat globule composition throughout lactation: a review. Front Nutr. (2022) 9:835856. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.835856, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Wang C, Qiao X, Gao Z, Jiang L, Mu Z. Advancement on milk fat globule membrane: separation, identification, and functional properties. Front Nutr. (2022) 8:807284. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.807284, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.O’Callaghan TF, McCarthy EK, Carey CC. Milk fat globule membrane ingredients and their potential applications for human health and performance. Curr Opin Food Sci. (2025) 63:101302. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2025.101302 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Mohamed HJJ, Lee EKH, Woo KCK, Sarvananthan R, Lee YY, Mohd Hussin ZA. Brain–immune–gut benefits with early life supplementation of milk fat globule membrane. JGH Open. (2022) 6:454–61. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12775, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hansen SF, Hogan SA, Tobin J, Rasmussen JT, Larsen LB, Wiking L. Microfiltration of raw milk for production of high-purity milk fat globule membrane material. J Food Eng. (2020) 276:109887. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.109887 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Wang M, Cao C, Wang Y, Li H, Li H, Yu J. Comparison of bovine milk fat globule membrane protein retention by different ultrafiltration membranes using a label-free proteomic approach. LWT. (2021) 144:111219. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111219 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Argenta AB, Scheer ADP. Membrane separation processes applied to whey: a review. Food Rev Int. (2020) 36:499–528. doi: 10.1080/87559129.2019.1649694 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Price N, Fei T, Clark S, Wang T. Extraction of phospholipids from a dairy by-product (whey protein phospholipid concentrate) using ethanol. J Dairy Sci. (2018) 101:8778–87. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14950, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Kanon AP, Spies SJ, MacGibbon AK, Fuad M. Milk fat globule membrane is associated with lower blood lipid levels in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Foods. (2024) 13:2725. doi: 10.3390/foods13172725, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Sun Y, Roos YH, Miao S. A review of factors affecting the structure, compositions, and the techno-functionalities of bovine milk fat globule and membrane. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2024) 150:104570. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104570 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Collins J, Caputi V, Manurung S, Gross G, Fitzgerald P, Golubeva A, et al. Supplementation with milk fat globule membrane from early life reduces maternal separation-induced visceral pain independent of enteric nervous system or intestinal permeability changes in the rat. Neuropharmacology. (2022) 210:109026. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2022.109026, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Sun Q, Yin S, He Y, Cao Y, Jiang C. Biomaterials and encapsulation techniques for probiotics: current status and future prospects in biomedical applications. Nano. (2023) 13:2185. doi: 10.3390/nano13152185, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Reque PM, Brandelli A. Encapsulation of probiotics and nutraceuticals: applications in functional food industry. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2021) 114:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.05.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kandasamy S, Naveen R. A review on the encapsulation of bioactive components using spray-drying and freeze-drying techniques. J Food Process Eng. (2022) 45:e14059. doi: 10.1111/jfpe.14059 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Ortega-Anaya J, Marciniak A, Jiménez-Flores R. Milk fat globule membrane phospholipids modify adhesion of Lactobacillus to mucus-producing Caco-2/goblet cells by altering the cell envelope. Food Res Int. (2021) 146:110471. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110471, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Zhang L, Chichlowski M, Gross G, Holle MJ, Lbarra-Sánchez LA, Wang S, et al. Milk fat globule membrane protects Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG from bile stress by regulating exopolysaccharide production and biofilm formation. J Agric Food Chem. (2020) 68:32396007: 6646–55. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c02267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Guerin J, Soligot C, Burgain J, Huguet M, Francius G, El-Kirat-Chatel S, et al. Adhesive interactions between milk fat globule membrane and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG inhibit bacterial attachment to Caco-2 TC7 intestinal cell. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. (2018) 167:29626719: 44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.03.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Verma A, Ghosh T, Bhushan B, Packirisamy G, Navani N, Sarangi P, et al. Characterization of difference in structure and function of fresh and mastitic bovine milk fat globules. PLoS One. (2019) 14:e0221830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Jiang H, Gong H, Li Q, Zhao L, Liu B, Gao J, et al. Differences in proteomic profiles and immunomodulatory activity of goat and cow milk fat globule membrane. Food Chem. (2024) 455:139885. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.139885, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Brink LR, Gueniot JP, Lönnerdal B. Effects of milk fat globule membrane and its various components on neurologic development in a postnatal growth restriction rat model. J Nutr Biochem. (2019) 69:163–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2019.03.013, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Gong H, Yuan Q, Pang J, Li T, Li J, Zhan B, et al. Dietary Milk fat globule membrane restores decreased intestinal mucosal barrier development and alterations of intestinal Flora in infant-formula-fed rat pups. Mol Nutr Food Res. (2020) 64:e2000232. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.202000232, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Zou X, Yokoyama W, Liu X, Wang K, Hong H, Luo Y, et al. Milk fat globule membrane relieves fatigue via regulation of oxidative stress and gut microbiota in BALB/c mice. Antioxidants. (2023) 12:712. doi: 10.3390/antiox12030712, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Yu Z, Li Y, Niu Y, Tang Q, Wu J. Milk fat globule membrane enhances colonic-mucus-barrier function in a rat model of short-bowel syndrome. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. (2021) 45:916–25. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1956, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Zhao J, Yi W, Liu B, Dai Y, Jiang T, Chen S, et al. MFGM components promote gut Bifidobacterium growth in infant and in vitro. Eur J Nutr. (2022) 61:277–88. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02638-5, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Cerdó T, Ruíz A, Acuna I, Nieto-Ruiz A, Diéguez E, Sepúlveda-Valbuena N, et al. A synbiotics, long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, and milk fat globule membranes supplemented formula modulates microbiota maturation and neurodevelopment. Clin Nutr. (2022) 41:1697–711. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Chen B, Jia Q, Chen Z, You Y, Liu Y, Zhao J, et al. Comparative evaluation of enriched formula milk powder with OPO and MFGM vs. breastfeeding and regular formula milk powder in full-term infants: a comprehensive study on gut microbiota, neurodevelopment, and growth. Food Funct. (2024) 15:1417–30. doi: 10.1039/D3FO03392A, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.He X, Parenti M, Grip T, Lönnerdal B, Timby N, Domellöf M, et al. Fecal microbiome and metabolome of infants fed bovine MFGM supplemented formula or standard formula with breast-fed infants as reference: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. (2019) 9:11589. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47953-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Mudd AT, Alexander LS, Berding K, Waworuntu RV, Berg BM, Donovan SM, et al. Dietary prebiotics, milk fat globule membrane, and lactoferrin affects structural neurodevelopment in the young piglet. Front Pediatr. (2016) 4:4. doi: 10.3389/fped.2016.00004, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Nieto-Ruiz A, García-Santos JA, Bermúdez MG, Herrmann F, Diéguez E, Sepúlveda-Valbuena N, et al. Cortical visual evoked potentials and growth in infants fed with bioactive compounds-enriched infant formula: results from COGNIS randomized clinical trial. Nutrients. (2019) 11:2456. doi: 10.3390/nu11102456, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Jeong S. Factors influencing development of the infant microbiota: from prenatal period to early infancy. Clin Experimental Pediatrics. (2022) 65:439–47. doi: 10.3345/cep.2021.00955, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Schoultz I, Claesson MJ, Dominguez-Bello MG, Fåk Hållenius F, Konturek P, Korpela K, et al. Gut microbiota development across the lifespan: disease links and health-promoting interventions. J Intern Med. (2025) 297:560–83. doi: 10.1111/joim.20089, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Ye L, Zhang Q, Xin F, Cao B, Qian L, Dong Y. Neonatal Milk fat globule membrane supplementation during breastfeeding ameliorates the deleterious effects of maternal high-fat diet on metabolism and modulates gut microbiota in adult mice offspring in a sex-specific way. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2021) 11:621957. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.621957, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Li T, Yuan Q, Gong H, Du M, Mao X. Gut microbiota mediates the alleviative effect of polar lipids-enriched milk fat globule membrane on obesity-induced glucose metabolism disorders in peripheral tissues in rat dams. Int J Obes. (2022) 46:793–801. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-01029-4, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Christensen C, Kok CR, Harris CL, Moore N, Wampler JL, Zhuang W, et al. Microbiota, metabolic profiles and immune biomarkers in infants receiving formula with added bovine milk fat globule membrane: a randomized, controlled trial. Front Nutr. (2024) 11:1465174. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1465174, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Marrs T, Jo J-H, Perkin MR, Rivett DW, Witney AA, Bruce KD, et al. Gut microbiota development during infancy: impact of introducing allergenic foods. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2021) 147:613–21.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.09.042, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Rueda R, Sabatel JL, Maldonado J, Molina-Font JA, Gil A. Addition of gangliosides to an adapted milk formula modifies levels of fecal Escherichia coli in preterm newborn infants. J Pediatr. (1998) 133:90–4. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(98)70184-2, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Zhang G, He M, Xiao L, Jiao Y, Han J, Li C, et al. Milk fat globule membrane protects Bifidobacterium longum ssp. infantis ATCC 15697 against bile stress by modifying global transcriptional responses. J Dairy Sci. (2024) 107:91–104. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-23591, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Yao Y, Zhou X, Hadiatullah H, Li C, Wang X, Wang S. Effects of human, caprine, and bovine milk fat globules on microbiota adhesion and gut microecology. J Agric Food Chem. (2021) 69:9778–87. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c01801, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Raz C, Paramonov MM, Shemesh M, Argov-Argaman N. The milk fat globule size governs a physiological switch for biofilm formation by Bacillus subtilis. Front Nutr. (2022) 9:844587. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.844587, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Yadav M, Mallappa RH, Ambatipudi K. Human milk fat globule delivers entrapped probiotics to the infant's gut and acts synergistically to ameliorate oxidative and pathogenic stress. Food Chem. (2025) 462:141030. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141030, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Yuan Q, Gong H, Du M, Li T, Mao X. Milk fat globule membrane supplementation to obese rats during pregnancy and lactation promotes neurodevelopment in offspring via modulating gut microbiota. Front Nutr. (2022) 9:945052. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.945052, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Wu Z, Liu X, Huang S, Li T, Zhang X, Pang J, et al. Milk fat globule membrane attenuates acute colitis and secondary liver injury by improving the mucus barrier and regulating the gut microbiota. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:865273. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.865273, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Chichlowski M, Bokulich N, Harris CL, Wampler JL, Li F, Berseth CL, et al. Effect of bovine milk fat globule membrane and lactoferrin in infant formula on gut microbiome and metabolome at 4 months of age. Curr Dev Nutr. (2021) 5:nzab027. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzab027, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Brugman S, Perdijk O, van Neerven RJ, Savelkoul HF. Mucosal immune development in early life: setting the stage. Arch Immunol Ther Exp. (2015) 63:251–68. doi: 10.1007/s00005-015-0329-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Timby N, Hernell O, Vaarala O, Melin M, Lönnerdal B, Domellöf M. Infections in infants fed formula supplemented with bovine milk fat globule membranes. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. (2015) 60:384–9. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000624, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Bai X, Shang J, Cao X, Li M, Yu H, Wu C, et al. Proteomic and phosphoproteomic reveal immune-related function of milk fat globule membrane in bovine milk of different lactation periods. Food Chem. (2024) 451:139295. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.139295, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Bhinder G, Allaire JM, Garcia C, Lau JT, Chan JM, Ryz NR, et al. Milk fat globule membrane supplementation in formula modulates the neonatal gut microbiome and normalizes intestinal development. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:45274. doi: 10.1038/srep45274, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Zhang X, Wu Y, Ye H, Feng C, Han D, Tao S, et al. Dietary milk fat globule membrane supplementation during late gestation increased the growth of neonatal piglets by improving their plasma parameters, intestinal barriers, and fecal microbiota. RSC Adv. (2020) 10:16987–98. doi: 10.1039/D0RA02618B, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Huang S, Wu Z, Liu C, Han D, Feng C, Wang S, et al. Milk fat globule membrane supplementation promotes neonatal growth and alleviates inflammation in low-birth-weight mice treated with lipopolysaccharide. Biomed Res Int. (2019) 2019:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2019/4876078, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Li Y, Wu J, Niu Y, Chen H, Tang Q, Zhong Y, et al. Milk fat globule membrane inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome activation and enhances intestinal barrier function in a rat model of short bowel. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. (2019) 43:677–85. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1435, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Zhang D, Wen J, Zhou J, Cai W, Qian L. Milk fat globule membrane ameliorates necrotizing enterocolitis in neonatal rats and suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response in IEC-6 enterocytes. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. (2019) 43:863–73. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1496, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Yu Z, Huang S, Li Y, Niu Y, Chen H, Wu J. Milk fat globule membrane alleviates short bowel syndrome-associated liver injury in rats through inhibiting autophagy and NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Front Nutr. (2022) 9:758762. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.758762, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Best KP, Yelland LN, Collins CT, McPhee AJ, Rogers GB, Choo J, et al. Growth of late preterm infants fed nutrient-enriched formula to 120 days corrected age-a randomized controlled trial. Front Pediatr. (2023) 11:1146089. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1146089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Snow DR, Ward RE, Olsen A, Jimenez-Flores R, Hintze KJ. Membrane-rich milk fat diet provides protection against gastrointestinal leakiness in mice treated with lipopolysaccharide. J Dairy Sci. (2011) 94:2201–12. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3886, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Nieto-Ruiz A, Diéguez E, Sepúlveda-Valbuena N, Herrmann F, Cerdó T, López-Torrecillas F, et al. The effects of an infant formula enriched with milk fat globule membrane, long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and synbiotics on child behavior up to 2.5 years old: the COGNIS study. Nutrients. (2020) 12:3825. doi: 10.3390/nu12123825, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Nieto-Ruiz A, Diéguez E, Sepúlveda-Valbuena N, Catena E, Jiménez J, Rodríguez-Palmero M, et al. Influence of a functional nutrients-enriched infant formula on language development in healthy children at four years old. Nutrients. (2020) 12:535. doi: 10.3390/nu12020535, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Timby N, Domellöf E, Hernell O, Lönnerdal B, Domellöf M. Neurodevelopment, nutrition, and growth until 12 mo of age in infants fed a low-energy, low-protein formula supplemented with bovine milk fat globule membranes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. (2014) 99:860–8. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.064295, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Li X, Peng Y, Li Z, Christensen B, Heckmann AB, Stenlund H, et al. Feeding infants formula with probiotics or milk fat globule membrane: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Front Pediatr. (2019) 7:347. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00347, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Maheshwari A, Mantry H, Bagga N, Frydrysiak-Brzozowska A, Badarch J, Rahman MM. Milk Fat Globules: 2024 Updates. Newborn. (2024) 3:19–37. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-11002-0085, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Jiang B, Xia Y, Zhou L, Liang X, Chen X, Chen M, et al. Safety and tolerance assessment of milk fat globule membrane-enriched infant formulas in healthy term Chinese infants: a randomised multicenter controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. (2022) 22:465. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03507-8, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Billeaud C, Puccio G, Saliba E, Guillois B, Vaysse C, Pecquet S, et al. Safety and tolerance evaluation of milk fat globule membrane-enriched infant formulas: a randomized controlled multicenter non-inferiority trial in healthy term infants. Clinical Medicine Insights Pediatrics. (2014) 8:51–60. doi: 10.4137/CMPed.S16962, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Fan X, Li C, Luo J, Wang R, Zhang H. Lipid composition and its molecular classes of milk fat globule membranes derived from yak, buffalo, and Holstein cow milk were characterized based on UHPLC-MS/MS and untargeted-lipidomics. LWT. (2025) 219:117563. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2025.117563 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Wiking L, Gregersen SB, Hansen SF, Hammershøj M. Heat-induced changes in milk fat and milk fat globules and its derived effects on acid dairy gelation – a review. Int Dairy J. (2022) 127:105213. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105213 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Yan D, Zhang L, Zhu Y, Han M, Wang Y, Tang J, et al. Changes in caprine milk fat globule membrane proteins after heat treatment using a label-free proteomics technique. Foods. (2022) 11:2705. doi: 10.3390/foods11172705, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Le TT, Van Camp J, Rombaut R, van Leeckwyck F, Dewettinck K. Effect of washing conditions on the recovery of milk fat globule membrane proteins during the isolation of milk fat globule membrane from milk. J Dairy Sci. (2009) 92:3592–603. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-2009, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Zhu D, Damodaran S. Composition, thermotropic properties, and oxidative stability of freeze-dried and spray-dried milk fat globule membrane isolated from cheese whey. J Agric Food Chem. (2011) 59:8931–8. doi: 10.1021/jf201688w, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Hedrick J, Yeiser M, Harris CL, Wampler JL, London HE, Patterson AC, et al. Infant formula with added bovine Milk fat globule membrane and modified Iron supports growth and Normal Iron status at one year of age: a randomized controlled trial. Nutrients. (2021) 13:4541. doi: 10.3390/nu13124541, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Wal JM. Bovine milk allergenicity. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. (2004) 93:S2–S11. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61726-7, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Lin T, Meletharayil G, Kapoor R, Abbaspourrad A. Bioactives in bovine milk: chemistry, technology, and applications. Nutr Rev. (2021) 79:48–69. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab099, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Aiuto B, Cirrincione S, Giuffrida MG, Cavallarin L, Portesi C, Rossi AM, et al. Milk fat globule proteins are relevant bovine Milk allergens in patients with α-gal syndrome. Mol Nutr Food Res. (2024) 68:2300796. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.202300796, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Raza GS, Herzig K-H, Leppäluoto J. Invited review: Milk fat globule membrane—a possible panacea for neurodevelopment, infections, cardiometabolic diseases, and frailty. J Dairy Sci. (2021) 104:7345–63. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19649, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Bakshi S, Paswan VK, Yadav SP, Bhinchhar BK, Kharkwal S, Rose H, et al. A comprehensive review on infant formula: nutritional and functional constituents, recent trends in processing and its impact on infants' gut microbiota. Front Nutr. (2023) 10:1194679. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1194679, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Lopez C, Cauty C, Guyomarc'h F. Organization of lipids in milks, infant milk formulas and various dairy products: role of technological processes and potential impacts. Dairy Sci Technol. (2015) 95:863–93. doi: 10.1007/s13594-015-0263-0, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table_1.DOCX (710.1KB, DOCX)
Table_2.DOCX (712.9KB, DOCX)
Table_3.DOCX (688KB, DOCX)
Table_4.DOCX (675.3KB, DOCX)

Articles from Frontiers in Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES