ABSTRACT
Background and Aims
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease influenced by genetic and environmental factors. Dietary habits, reproductive characteristics, and physical activity have been proposed as potential contributors to MS susceptibility. This study aimed to investigate the association of dietary intake, supplement use, reproductive factors, and physical activity with MS in Kermanshah Province, Iran.
Methods
This case–control study included 600 participants (300 MS patients and 300 matched healthy controls) from Kermanshah. Data were collected using the validated Persian version of the Environmental Exposure and Lifestyle Risk Factors in MS Questionnaire (EnvIMS‐Q). Logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
Compared with controls, participants with MS reported lower consumption of several foods, including fish (adjusted OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.19–0.50), seafood (adjusted OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.10–0.98), nuts (adjusted OR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.39–0.93), and dairy products. Fish oil supplementation was less common among patients with MS (adjusted OR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.13–0.61). Female patients reported higher frequencies of oral contraceptive use, miscarriage, and assisted reproduction. Vigorous physical activity was significantly lower among patients than controls, whereas mild physical activity did not differ significantly. No significant association was observed for vitamin D supplementation.
Conclusion
This study identified associations between several dietary, reproductive, and lifestyle factors and MS in a high‐prevalence region of Iran. Lower consumption of selected nutrient‐rich foods, lower fish oil supplement use, certain reproductive factors, and lower levels of vigorous physical activity were associated with higher odds of MS. Prospective studies are needed to clarify temporal relationships and causality.
Keywords: Environmental Risk Factors, Lifestyle Determinants, Multiple Sclerosis, Nutrition, Physical Activity, Reproductive Health
1. Introduction
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and immune‐mediated disease of the central nervous system (CNS), characterized by demyelination, axonal damage, and progressive neurodegeneration. It is one of the most common non‐traumatic causes of disability among young adults, with a rising global prevalence that imposes substantial medical, social, and economic burdens [1, 2]. Clinically, MS presents in several forms, including relapsing‐remitting MS (RRMS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS), primary progressive MS (PPMS), and the less frequent progressive‐relapsing MS (PRMS), with RRMS accounting for approximately 85% of cases [3].
Epidemiological evidence highlights the heterogeneous distribution of MS worldwide, ranging from less than 5 per 100,000 in tropical regions to more than 200 per 100,000 in parts of North America and Europe [2, 4]. In recent decades, Iran has reported a sharp increase in MS prevalence, with the province of Kermanshah being among the high‐risk regions [5, 6, 7]. This trend has raised growing concerns regarding disease burden and the urgent need for preventive strategies.
Although the precise etiology of MS remains unclear, it is widely accepted that a complex interplay of genetic susceptibility and environmental exposures contributes to disease onset [8, 9, 10, 11]. Among the environmental factors, nutrition has been increasingly emphasized. Diets rich in antioxidants, vitamin D, and polyunsaturated fatty acids have been associated with neuroprotection and reduced inflammation, while vitamin D deficiency in particular is consistently linked to both disease risk and progression [11, 12].
Hormonal factors are also significant in explaining the sex‐related differences in MS prevalence [13]. Estrogens modulate immune responses and may influence disease course. For example, the use of oral contraceptives has been associated with a reduced risk of MS, whereas pregnancy and postpartum conditions are known to alter disease activity [14].
Physical activity, meanwhile, is considered a potential protective factor. Regular exercise has been shown to improve aerobic capacity, muscular strength, and health‐related quality of life in MS patients, while also reducing systemic inflammation and modulating immune function. Importantly, prospective studies suggest that higher levels of physical activity may lower both the risk of developing MS and its subsequent progression [15].
Given the high prevalence of MS in Iran—particularly in Kermanshah province—and the growing body of evidence linking lifestyle‐related risk factors such as diet, hormonal status, and physical activity with disease susceptibility, a deeper investigation into these associations is crucial. Understanding these relationships can not only enhance preventive strategies but also guide public health interventions and inform individualized approaches to disease management.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Participants
The study was conducted in Kermanshah province, Iran, from July 2024 to October 2025. A total of 600 participants were recruited, consisting of 300 patients with confirmed MS and 300 healthy controls. All MS patients were diagnosed by neurologists based on clinical history, neurological examination, paraclinical investigations, and the 2017 McDonald criteria [16]. Patients with MS were identified from the National Multiple Sclerosis Registry of Iran (NMSRI) [17], Kermanshah. The sample size was determined by the availability of eligible participants during the study period, and all individuals meeting the inclusion criteria were invited to participate.
2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion criteria for cases were: confirmed MS diagnosis, age between 18 and 50 years, residency in Kermanshah province for at least 2 years, and willingness to participate.
Exclusion criteria for cases included: presence of other neurological disorders, severe head trauma with loss of consciousness, or chronic comorbid diseases.
Inclusion criteria for controls were: age between 18 and 50 years, no history of MS or neurological disease, residency in Kermanshah for at least 2 years, and consent to participate.
Exclusion criteria for controls included: pregnancy, history of neurological disease, major chronic illness, or inability to provide informed consent.
2.3. Sampling and Data Collection
Participants were recruited through convenience sampling. Patients with MS were identified through the Kermanshah branch of NMSRI and were contacted through Imam Reza Hospital. Healthy controls were recruited from the same underlying source population as the cases, namely residents of Kermanshah Province without a history of neurological or autoimmune diseases. Healthy volunteers were recruited from community settings as well as companions or relatives of non‐neurological patients attending Imam Reza Hospital. Controls were frequency‐matched to cases according to age and sex. Demographic and clinical data for patients were collected from the Kermanshah provincial NMSRI and medical records. After initial screening, participants were invited for face‐to‐face interviews, during which the study aims were explained and written informed consent was obtained. For both cases and controls, data were collected using the Environmental Exposure and Lifestyle Risk Factors in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (EnvIMS‐Q), which has been validated and culturally adapted into Persian with established reliability [18]. Interviews were conducted by two trained neurology residents who had received standardized instruction on questionnaire administration to ensure consistency and accuracy. To minimize interviewer and recall bias, the same standardized questionnaire and interview protocol were used for both groups by the same trained interviewers. All interviews were performed in a private setting to maintain confidentiality. Questionnaires were anonymized and coded for data security.
2.4. Variables and Measurements
The questionnaire covered a wide range of demographic, lifestyle, nutritional, hormonal, and physical activity factors [13, 19]. Nutritional intake was assessed by frequency of consumption of major food groups (dairy products, fish, meat, fruits, vegetables, nuts, fast food, and supplements). Dietary variables reflected participants’ self‐reported usual weekly consumption patterns [13]. Hormonal factors included contraceptive use, pregnancy history, and fertility treatments [19]. Reproductive variables were collected as self‐reported categorical variables. Physical activity was measured in terms of frequency, duration, and intensity of mild and vigorous activities [20]. Supplement use was recorded as a yes/no exposure.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 29.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables were summarized as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Normality of continuous variables was assessed prior to analysis.
Between‐group comparisons were conducted using the independent‐samples t‐test or Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables, as appropriate, and the chi‐square test for categorical variables. For categorical variables with small expected cell counts, Fisher's exact test was used when appropriate.
Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for factors associated with MS. Sex was included as an adjustment variable in multivariable models because of the observed imbalance between groups. Results are presented as effect estimates together with their 95% confidence intervals to facilitate interpretation of both the magnitude and precision of associations.
All analyses were pre‐specified according to the study objectives. All statistical tests were two‐sided, and a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
2.6. Ethical Considerations
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (Ethics Code: IR.KUMS.MED.REC.1403.059). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrollment. All collected data were anonymized, coded, and analyzed confidentially to ensure the privacy.
3. Results
All enrolled participants were included in the final analyses, and no participants were excluded after recruitment. A total of 600 participants were enrolled in the study, comprising 300 patients with MS and 300 healthy controls. Although controls were frequency‐matched to cases by age and sex, a modest imbalance in sex distribution remained between groups. Women represented the majority in both groups, but the proportion was higher among MS patients (78.1% vs. 70.7%, p = 0.03); Therefore, sex was included as an adjustment variable in all multivariable logistic regression models.
3.1. Reproductive and Hormonal Factors
Among female participants, oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use was more common among women with MS (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.03–2.19; p = 0.03). Miscarriage was associated with higher odds of MS (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.04–2.83; p = 0.04). Assisted reproduction was more frequent among MS patients (OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.17–14.63; p = 0.03). No significant differences were found regarding menstrual regularity or breastfeeding history. (Table 1).
Table 1.
Demographic, socioeconomic, and reproductive characteristics of participants.
| Variable | MS patients (n = 300) | Controls (n = 300) | OR (95% Cl) | p‐value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (female), n (%) | 232(78.1%) | 212 (70.7%) | — | 0.03 |
| Age, mean ± SD | 37.05 ± 7.37 | 36.13 ± 9.09 | — | 0.36 |
| Married, n (%) | 191 (64.3%) | 196 (65.3%) | — | 0.79 |
| OCP use, n (%)* | 115 (49.1%) | 83 (39.2%) | 1.50 (1.03, 2.19) | 0.03 |
| Regular menstruation, n (%)* | 168(71.8%) | 154 (76.6%) | 0.78 (0.48, 1.25) | 0.30 |
| Miscarriage, n (%)* | 54 (23.1%) | 29 (14.4%) | 1.71 (1.04, 2.83) | 0.04 |
| Assisted reproduction (IUI/IVF), n (%)* | 14 (6.0%) | 3 (1.5%) | 4.14 (1.17, 14.63) | 0.03 |
| History of breastfeeding, n (%)* | 111 (47.4%) | 95 (47.3%) | 1.12 (0.75, 1.67) | 0.59 |
Note: ORs were obtained from univariate logistic regression. Reference category for binary variables = No exposure (e.g., No Miscarriage, No history of IUI/IVF, etc.).
Abbreviations: CI = Confidence Interval, IUI = Intra Uterine Insemination, IVF = In Vitro Fertilization, MS = Multiple Sclerosis, OCP = Oral Contraceptive Pills, OR = Odds Ratio, SD = Standard Deviation.
Among women only.
3.2. Nutritional Factors
Dietary assessment revealed several differences between the groups (Table 2). Higher milk consumption was associated with lower odds of MS (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46–0.97; p = 0.03). Higher yogurt consumption was associated with lower odds of MS (aOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43–0.89; p = 0.01). Higher cheese consumption was associated with lower odds of MS (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47–0.95; p = 0.03). Higher red meat consumption was associated with lower odds of MS (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45–0.99; p = 0.04). Furthermore, Higher fish consumption was associated with substantially lower odds of MS (aOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.19–0.50; p < 0.001). Higher seafood consumption was associated with lower odds of MS (aOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10–0.98; p = 0.045). Higher nut consumption was associated with lower odds of MS (aOR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39–0.93; p = 0.02). Pizza and burger consumption were reported more frequently among controls than among MS patients. (Table 2).
Table 2.
Weekly food consumption in MS patients and controls.
| Food item (serving/week) | MS patients (n = 300) | Controls (n = 300) | Crude OR (95% Cl) | p‐value | Adjusted OR (95% Cl) | p‐value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milk | 2.52 ± 2.17 | 2.76 ± 1.79 | 0.69 (0.48, 0.99) | 0.05 | 0.67 (0.46, 0.97) | 0.03 |
| Yogurt | 3.11 ± 2.26 | 3.42 ± 2.48 | 0.61 (0.43, 0.88) | 0.008 | 0.62 (0.43, 0.89) | 0.01 |
| Cheese | 4.06 ± 2.43 | 4.69 ± 2.60 | 0.70 (0.49, 0.99) | 0.04 | 0.67 (0.47, 0.95) | 0.02 |
| Poultry (chicken/turkey) | 2.86 ± 2.32 | 2.90 ± 1.42 | 0.82 (0.55, 1.22) | 0.33 | 0.83 (0.56, 1.23) | 0.36 |
| Red meat | 2.63 ± 1.46 | 3.03 ± 1.78 | 0.68 (0.46, 1.00) | 0.05 | 0.67 (0.45, 0.99) | 0.04 |
| Eggs | 3.22 ± 1.82 | 3.06 ± 1.63 | 1.23 (0.84, 1.80) | 0.29 | 1.26 (0.85, 1.86) | 0.25 |
| Fish | 0.18 ± 0.49 | 0.44 ± 0.76 | 0.33 (0.20, 0.54) | < 0.001 | 0.31 (0.19, 0.50) | < 0.001 |
| Shrimp/Seafood | 0.01 ± 0.12 | 0.06 ± 0.26 | 0.28 (0.09, 0.87) | 0.03 | 0.31 (0.10, 0.98) | 0.045 |
| Fruits | 4.75 ± 2.14 | 5.03 ± 2.23 | 0.84 (0.60, 1.18) | 0.31 | 0.83 (0.59, 1.17) | 0.29 |
| Vegetables | 3.02 ± 2.70 | 3.03 ± 1.87 | 0.70 (0.48, 1.03) | 0.46 | 0.69 (0.48, 1.01) | 0.36 |
| Nuts | 1.70 ± 2.00 | 2.06 ± 1.92 | 0.60 (0.39, 0.92) | 0.02 | 0.60 (0.39, 0.93) | 0.02 |
| Sausage/processed meat | 0.77 ± 0.99 | 0.78 ± 0.91 | 1.29 (0.83, 2.02) | 0.26 | 1.27 (0.81, 1.99) | 0.30 |
| Pizza | 0.44 ± 1.16 | 1.11 ± 1.94 | 0.33 (0.21, 0.54) | < 0.001 | 0.35 (0.22, 0.56) | < 0.001 |
| Burger | 0.48 ± 0.83 | 0.63 ± 0.77 | 0.58 (0.40, 0.84) | 0.004 | 0.60 (0.41, 0.87) | 0.008 |
Note: For exploratory analyses, continuous dietary variables were categorized according to their median values and entered into logistic regression models. Participants with values below the median were assigned to the reference category (coded as 0), and those with values at or above the median were coded as 1. Crude odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using univariate logistic regression analyses. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for sex were applied to obtain adjusted ORs.
Abbreviations: CI = Confidence Interval, MS = Multiple Sclerosis, OR = Odds Ratio.
3.3. Supplement Use
As shown in Table 3, Vitamin C supplementation was associated with lower odds of MS (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44–0.91; p = 0.01). Fish oil supplementation was associated with markedly lower odds of MS (aOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.13–0.61; p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed for vitamin D, multivitamins, calcium, iron, folic acid, or vitamin B12.
Table 3.
Supplement use among MS patients and controls.
| Supplement | MS patients (n = 300) | Controls (n = 300) | Crude OR (95% Cl) | p‐value | Adjusted OR (95% Cl) | p‐value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D supplements | 58 (19.5%) | 63 (21.7%) | 0.80 (0.54, 1.21) | 0.30 | 0.73 (0.49, 1.08) | 0.12 |
| Vitamin C supplements | 74 (25.2%) | 99 (33.9%) | 0.62 (0.43, 0.89) | 0.01 | 0.63 (0.44, 0.91) | 0.01 |
| Fish oil supplements | 9 (3%) | 28 (9.5%) | 0.28 (0.13, 0.60) | 0.001 | 0.28 (0.13, 0.61) | 0.001 |
| Multivitamins | 75 (25.3%) | 77(26.6%) | 0.92 (0.63, 1.34) | 0.66 | 0.92 (0.63, 1.35) | 0.68 |
| Calcium | 53 (17.9%) | 66(22.8%) | 0.73 (0.48, 1.10) | 0.13 | 0.73 (0.48, 1.10) | 0.14 |
| Iron | 89 (30.2%) | 87(29.8%) | 0.95 (0.66, 1.36) | 0.76 | 0.90 (0.62, 1.29) | 0.56 |
| Folic acid | 64 (21.5%) | 57(19.6%) | 1.07 (0.71, 1.61) | 0.73 | 1.01 (0.67, 1.53) | 0.95 |
| Vitamin B12 | 46 (15.5%) | 58 (19.9%) | 0.69 (0.45, 1.07) | 0.10 | 0.69 (0.45, 1.06) | 0.09 |
Note: Crude ORs were obtained from univariate logistic regression. Adjusted ORs were derived from multivariable models adjusted for sex.
Abbreviations: CI = Confidence Interval, MS = Multiple Sclerosis, OR = Odds Ratio.
3.4. Physical Activity
Physical activity levels differed significantly between groups (Table 4). While mild activity did not differ in terms of frequency or duration, vigorous activity was substantially lower among MS patients.
Table 4.
Physical activity among MS patients and controls.
| Physical activity measure | MS patients (n = 300) | Controls (n = 300) | p‐value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mild activity (sessions/week) | 4.36 ± 2.19 | 4.19 ± 1.88 | 0.27 |
| Mild activity (min/session) | 46.85 ± 46.63 | 47.12 ± 45.85 | 0.17 |
| Vigorous activity (sessions/week) | 2.13 ± 1.32 | 4.29 ± 1.29 | < 0.001 |
| Vigorous activity (min/session) | 32.40 ± 32.41 | 38.37 ± 32.66 | 0.03 |
Abbreviations: Min = Minute, MS = Multiple Sclerosis.
4. Discussion
This study investigated dietary intake, supplement use, reproductive factors, and physical activity in relation to MS risk in Kermanshah. The results suggest associations between several modifiable exposures and MS in this high‐prevalence region.
Patients consumed significantly less milk, yogurt, cheese, red meat, nuts, fish, and seafood compared with controls, while pizza was consumed more frequently among controls. These findings indicate that lower intake of these foods was associated with higher odds of MS in this study population. Several studies have suggested that vitamin D, omega‐3 fatty acids, and antioxidants present in fish, dairy, and nuts, which may contribute to immune regulation and lower inflammatory activity [2, 11, 12, 21, 22]. For example, prospective studies have reported that higher fish intake is associated with lower MS risk, likely due to both vitamin D and marine fatty acids. Similarly, lower consumption of dairy products and red meat has been associated with lower intake of vitamin D, calcium, and iron, nutrients that may influence immune and neurological function [11, 12, 23]. Higher pizza consumption was observed among controls than among participants with MS. However, this finding should be interpreted cautiously, as the case–control design does not allow causal inference and dietary habits may have changed following disease diagnosis. Therefore, the observed difference may reflect post‐diagnosis dietary modifications rather than a direct association between pizza consumption and MS.
Although vitamin D deficiency is consistently reported as a major risk factor for MS [11, 12, 21, 22], our study did not find significant differences in supplementation between patients and controls. This may reflect the widespread supplementation programs in Iran. Nonetheless, the lower use of fish oil and vitamin C supplements among patients is consistent with evidence that omega‐3 fatty acids and antioxidants may reduce neuroinflammation and support myelin integrity [11, 12, 23].
Female patients had higher rates of OCP use, miscarriage, and assisted reproduction compared with controls. The relationship between OCPs and MS risk remains controversial: while some reports suggest a protective effect through hormonal modulation [14], others have shown no effect or even increased risk. Our findings add to the existing body of evidence, although the observed associations should be interpreted cautiously, given the observational nature of the study. Reproductive factors such as miscarriage and infertility treatments may indicate underlying immune dysregulation, consistent with prior studies linking reproductive health to MS risk [14, 24, 25]. Notably, some studies have reported that gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist therapy, commonly used during assisted reproductive procedures, may exacerbate MS disease activity, possibly through transient immune activation or hormonal fluctuations [26, 27, 28]. This observation aligns with our findings, supporting the hypothesis that hormonal manipulation in fertility treatments may influence disease course.
Patients reported lower levels of vigorous activity than controls, while mild activity did not differ significantly. These results are in line with evidence that regular vigorous physical activity has been associated with lower systemic inflammation, modulation of immune activity, and improved neurological outcomes [7, 15, 24]. Studies in Iran and abroad have shown that higher levels of exercise are associated with lower odds of MS and slower disease progression, supporting a potential association between higher physical activity levels and more favorable MS‐related outcomes [7, 15, 29].
An important consideration when interpreting the present findings is that several environmental and lifestyle exposures associated with MS may exert their effects long before the clinical onset of disease. Recent evidence suggests that childhood and adolescence represent critical periods during which environmental factors may influence future MS susceptibility. A recent systematic review and meta‐analysis reported that multiple pediatric environmental exposures are associated with later MS risk [30]. Therefore, some of the dietary and lifestyle associations observed in our study may reflect long‐term exposure patterns that began years before disease manifestation rather than only current adult behaviors.
5. Strengths and Limitations
This study has several strengths. It included a relatively large sample size with equal numbers of cases and controls, which provided adequate statistical power for comparisons. The groups were frequency‐matched for age and sex, and efforts were made to minimize selection bias through recruitment from a well‐defined population. Moreover, the study simultaneously assessed multiple domains of potential risk factors—including reproductive, nutritional, supplement use, and physical activity—which allowed for a more comprehensive evaluation of lifestyle and biological determinants of MS.
Nevertheless, some limitations should be considered. Despite frequency matching by age and sex, a statistically significant imbalance in sex distribution remained between groups. Although sex was included as an adjustment variable in multivariable analyses, residual confounding cannot be completely excluded. In addition, as a case–control design, causal relationships between exposures and MS cannot be established. Information on diet, supplement use, physical activity, and reproductive history was collected by self‐reported questionnaires, which may be subject to recall bias and misclassification. Furthermore, dietary exposures were assessed based on self‐reported weekly consumption patterns at the time of data collection. Information regarding the duration and long‐term stability of these dietary habits was unavailable; therefore, exposure misclassification cannot be excluded. In addition, other potential confounders such as genetic susceptibility, comorbid conditions, and environmental exposures were not assessed. Finally, several continuous exposure variables were categorized according to their median values because clinically established cut‐off points were unavailable; therefore, some loss of information cannot be excluded.
6. Conclusion
Our findings indicate that reduced consumption of fish, dairy, nuts, and red meat, along with lower use of protective supplements, reproductive risk factors, and reduced vigorous physical activity, are associated with higher odds of MS in Kermanshah. These results highlight the importance of diet and lifestyle modifications, reproductive health awareness, and exercise promotion as potentially important public health considerations in populations at elevated risk of MS.
Author Contributions
Nazanin Razazian: project administration, writing – review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition. Shiva Bashiri: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing – original draft. Asma Aliahmadi: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, investigation. Sharareh Eskandarieh: conceptualization, methodology, validation, writing – review and editing. Mohammad Ali Sahraian: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, validation. Milad Mohamad Yari: writing – original draft, writing – review and editing, formal analysis, software. Mansour Rezaei: methodology, data curation, software, visualization. Negin Fakhri: software, methodology, resources.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Transparency Statement
Milad MohamadYari affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the use of Grammarly generative AI to improve the English language, spelling, grammar, and syntax of this manuscript. This study was supported by Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran. The funding source had no role in the study design; collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; writing of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are not publicly available because they contain information that could compromise the privacy of research participants. De‐identified data may be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and with appropriate ethical approval.
References
- 1. Dobson R. and Giovannoni G., “Multiple Sclerosis ‐ a Review,” European Journal of Neurology 26, no. 1 (2019): 27–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Yamout B., Al‐Jumah M., Sahraian M. A., et al., “Consensus Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: 2023 Revision of the MENACTRIMS Guidelines,” Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders 83 (2024): 105435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Thompson A. J., Baranzini S. E., Geurts J., Hemmer B., and Ciccarelli O., “Multiple Sclerosis,” Lancet 391, no. 10130 (2018): 1622–1636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Khan G. and Hashim M. J., “Epidemiology of Multiple Sclerosis: Global, Regional, National and Sub‐National‐Level Estimates and Future Projections,” Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health 15, no. 1 (2025): 21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hosseinzadeh A., Baneshi M. R., Sedighi B., Kermanchi J., and Haghdoost A. A., “Incidence of Multiple Sclerosis in Iran: A Nationwide, Population‐Based Study,” Public Health 175 (2019): 138–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mirmosayyeb O., Shaygannejad V., Bagherieh S., Hosseinabadi A. M., and Ghajarzadeh M., “Prevalence of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Neurological Science 43, no. 1 (2022): 233–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Razazian N., Eskandarieh S., Siabani S., et al., “Prevalence of Multiple Sclerosis and Its Clinical and Demographic Characteristics in Kurdish Populations in Western Iran (2020),” Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders 57 (2022): 103441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Jakimovski D., Bittner S., Zivadinov R., et al., “Multiple Sclerosis,” Lancet 403, no. 10422 (2024): 183–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ward M. and Goldman M. D., “Epidemiology and Pathophysiology of Multiple Sclerosis,” Continuum 28, no. 4 (2022): 988–1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Vitturi B. K., Cellerino M., Boccia D., et al., “Environmental Risk Factors for Multiple Sclerosis: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of Neurology 272, no. 8 (2025): 513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Stoiloudis P., Kesidou E., Bakirtzis C., et al., “The Role of Diet and Interventions on Multiple Sclerosis: A Review,” Nutrients 14, no. 6 (2022): 1150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Abdollahpour I., Nedjat S., Mansournia M. A., Sahraian M. A., and van der Mei I., “Lifestyle Factors and Multiple Sclerosis: A Population‐Based Incident Case‐Control Study,” Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders 22 (2018): 128–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ezabadi S. G., Ashtari F., Baghbanian S. M., et al., “Investigation of Pregnancy Tendency, Reproductive Characteristics, and Disability in Women With Multiple Sclerosis: A Secondary Data Analysis of the National Registry in Iran,” Current Journal of Neurology 23, no. 2 (2024): 106–116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Ghajarzadeh M., Mohammadi A., Shahraki Z., Sahraian M. A., and Mohammadifar M., “Pregnancy History, Oral Contraceptive Pills Consumption (OCPs), and Risk of Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” International Journal of Preventive Medicine 13 (2022): 89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Dorans K. S., Massa J., Chitnis T., Ascherio A., and Munger K. L., “Physical Activity and the Incidence of Multiple Sclerosis,” Neurology 87, no. 17 (2016): 1770–1776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Thompson A. J., Banwell B. L., Barkhof F., et al., “Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: 2017 Revisions of the McDonald Criteria,” Lancet Neurology 17, no. 2 (2018): 162–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ayoubi S., Asadigandomani H., Bafrani M. A., et al., “The National Multiple Sclerosis Registry System of Iran (NMSRI): Aspects and Methodological Dimensions,” Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders 72 (2023): 104610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Sahraian M. A., Naghshineh H., Shati M., Jahromi S. R., and Rezaei N., “Persian Adaptation of a Questionnaire of Environmental Risk Factors in Multiple Sclerosis (EnvIMS‐Q),” Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders 10 (2016): 82–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Rezaeimanesh N., Moghadasi A. N., Sahraian M. A., and Eskandarieh S., “Dietary Risk Factors of Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Population‐Based Case‐Control Study,” Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders 56 (2021): 103233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Asadi Gandomani H., Naser Moghadasi A., Sahraian M. A., and Eskandarieh S., “Determining the Effect of Sun Exposure and Physical Activity on the Incidence of Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis,” Tehran University Medical Journal 79, no. 12 (2022): 958–965. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Balasooriya N. N., Elliott T. M., Neale R. E., Vasquez P., Comans T., and Gordon L. G., “The Association Between Vitamin D Deficiency and Multiple Sclerosis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders 90 (2024): 105804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Etemadifar M., Afzali P., Tabrizi N., and Hosseini S. A., “Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis With Primary Progressive Course‐‐Report of a Retrospective Cohort Study in Iran,” Neuropediatrics 44, no. 3 (2013): 167–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Lin X., Zarghami A., Jelinek G. A., Simpson‐Yap S., Neate S., and Nag N., “Diet and omega‐3 and Vitamin D Supplement Use Predict Five‐Year Fatigue and Disability Trajectories in People With Multiple Sclerosis,” Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders 86 (2024): 105615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Adelman G., Rane S. G., and Villa K. F., “The Cost Burden of Multiple Sclerosis in the United States: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” Journal of Medical Economics 16, no. 5 (2013): 639–647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Vandebergh M., Degryse N., Dubois B., and Goris A., “Environmental Risk Factors in Multiple Sclerosis: Bridging Mendelian Randomization and Observational Studies,” Journal of Neurology 269, no. 8 (2022): 4565–4574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Sakurai K., Shinohara K., Imai T., Yamano Y., and Hasegawa Y., “Severe Multiple Sclerosis Manifesting Upon GnRH Agonist Therapy for Uterine Fibroids,” Internal Medicine 59, no. 23 (2020): 3093–3096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Kopp T. I., Pinborg A., Glazer C. H., and Magyari M., “Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment and Risk of Multiple Sclerosis ‐ a Danish Cohort Study,” Fertility and Sterility 119, no. 2 (2023): 291–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Graham E. L., Bakkensen J. B., Anderson A., et al., “Inflammatory Activity After Diverse Fertility Treatments: A Multicenter Analysis in the Modern Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Era,” Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation 10, no. 3 (2023): e200106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Asadi S. and Eslami R., “Effects of Different Exercise Trainings on Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Review Study,” New Approaches in Exercise Physiology 4, no. 8 (2022): 38–70. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Vitturi B. K., Cellerino M., Boccia D., et al., “Childhood and Adolescent Environmental Risk Factors for Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review With Meta‐Analysis,” European Journal of Neurology 32, no. 11 (2025): e70398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are not publicly available because they contain information that could compromise the privacy of research participants. De‐identified data may be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and with appropriate ethical approval.
