Abstract
Topological indices are graph invariants of the molecular graph that facilitate the study of structural characteristics pertaining to connectivity and shape. This paper addresses the application of degree-based topological indices coupled with Shannon entropy to analyze the structural features of covalent organic frameworks JLU44 and JLU45. Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs) are a class of crystelline, porus organic polymers characterized by strong covalent linages between their building blocks. The study addresses the complexity and uncertainties inherent in molecular structures by pinpointing graph-theoretical metrics, effectively representing the connectivity and interaction dynamics among the molecules. The utilization of Shannon entropy derived from topological indices improves the understanding of structural information, aiding in the comparative analysis of the frameworks’ structural characteristics. This demonstrates the efficiency of entropy-based metrics in measuring molecular complexity and highlights the value of topological descriptors in furthering the investigation of chemically relevant graph structures.
Keywords: Topological indices, Shannon entropy, Covalent organic frameworks, Molecular graph, Edge-partitioning method
Subject terms: Chemistry, Materials science, Mathematics and computing
Introduction
Hydrogen energy is the most promising alternative to fossil fuels, providing a clean, high density energy transporter that emits only water as a byproduct after burning1. The need for effective hydrogen generation technology to power fuel cells, industrial operations, and transportation has increased as the world moves toward sustainable energy systems. Since sunlight and water are two of the most plentiful renewable resources on Earth, photocatalytic water splitting technology is thought to be the most promising of the many generating methods since it directly transforms solar energy into chemical energy2,3.
Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution is the process of creating hydrogen gas with water, light mostly sunlight and a photocatalyst. By absorbing photons to create electron hole pairs, which then move to the surface to propel the reduction of water into hydrogen gas, the photocatalyst plays a crucial part in this process. Researchers have concentrated on creating materials with great structural stability, effective charge separation, and broad light absorption in order to optimize efficiency. Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs), a novel type of crystalline, porous polymers for photocatalysis, have drawn a lot of interest recently4–8. They are perfect candidates for hydrogen evolution because to their huge surface areas, extended
-conjugation, and highly adjustable architectures9–11.In particular, there has been considerable promise in the creation of completely conjugated, benzobisoxazole-bridged COFs. Wang et al. constructed OZBT-COF and investigated its use in photocatalytic organic transformations based on its recyclability and stability12. Zong et al. used nitrogen site engineering to optimize pyrene-based Py-COF variants to improve hydrogen production13. Du et al. created a cocatalyst-free
-ketoenamine Tp-Py-COF to generate sacrificial hydrogen from water14. Li et al. developed Re(I)-decorated dibenzochrysene COF hybrids to reduce CO
to CO15. The two most notable instances of this class are COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45,introduced by Si Ma et al. two novel benzobisoxazole-bridged, sp
carbon linked 2D-COFs, which differ mainly in their aromatic core units, pyrene for COF-JLU45 and triazine for COF-JLU4416–18.
Despite their success in experiments, a more detailed, mathematical understanding of the structural distinctions between these frameworks is crucial. The inherent complexity and information content of these periodic networks are frequently not adequately captured by qualitative definitions of“conjugation”and“porosity.” In order to close this gap, the complicated molecular graphs of COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45 are transformed into distinct numerical descriptors using degree-based topological indices19–23. Additionally, we use these indices to determine the frameworks’ Shannon entropy. The idea of Shannon entropy was initially laid out by Claude Shannon in his seminal work which was published in 194824. Entropy provides a theoretical foundation for forecasting features like graph energy and thermal stability in chemical graph theory by acting as a potent metric to measure structural disorder, complexity, and the distribution of vertex degrees25–29. The graph entropy based on vertex orbit was first presented by Rashevsky in 195530. This was utilized by Mowshowitz for a few graph operations31. Dehmer investigated the inequalities derived from the graph entropies and vertex probability32. Ramin Kazemi used degree-based topological indices to calculate entropy on weighted graphs33.
The aim of this study is to analyze the chemical structures of COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45. It is started by calculating their degree-based edge partitions. Subsequently, various degree-based topological indices are computed for these molecules. Later, the Shannon entropies of the structures are determined, enabling a comparative analysis between the two frameworks. Graph entropy provides a tool to calculate the uncertainty inherent in the structural configurations that helps to effectively model connectivity information based on edge degrees and interactions. Through the examination of these entropy metrics, the study seeks to identify differences in structural information content that may correspond to variations in chemical and physical properties in which the best network can be found between the two. This approach not only helps in assessing the complexity of these covalent organic frameworks but also offers deeper insights into how topological indices influence entropy in chemically significant graphs.
Materials and methods
The study analyzes the structural topology and organic linkers of the covalent organic frameworks JLU44 and JLU45. JLU44 has triazine units, whereas JLU45 contains pyrene units in its core structure. Both frameworks are generated using Knoevenagel polycondensation, which produces long-range structured crystalline structures with surface areas and photoelectric characteristics. The inclusion of pyrene and platinum allows the COF JLU-45 to absorb hydrogen across a wide range. JLU-45 acts as a metal-free photocatalyst, relying solely on sunlight to perform the chemical reaction that produces hydrogen fuel, making hydrogen fuel production more sustainable and reliable.
Let
be a simple undirected molecular graph,
and
represent the vertex set and edge set respectively. Let
and
be a vertices such that
then,
and
are said to be neighbours if there exists an edge
connecting them. The degree of vertex
is said to be the total number of neighbours of
. It is denoted by
34–36. Figures 1 and 2 represent the molecular graph of COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45 respectively. Through out the paper,
is regarded as a size metric indicative of the growth of the COF structures.
refers to the growth of extended sp
-conjugated framework, resulting in larger domain sizes, longer
- delocalization pathways, and higher structural complexity, which is relevant to photocatalytic function.
Fig. 1.

Molecular graph of COF-JLU44.
Fig. 2.

Molecular graph of COF-JLU45.
In this study the degree-based edge partition method is used and is done by calculating the degrees of vertices and considering the adjacent edges. Let
and
be degrees of vertices
and
respectively such that
then,
![]() |
1 |
Edge partitioning involves classifying edges based on the degree of their end vertices37–40. Later, we classify them into sets based on edges with the same degree composition and calculate the cardinality of each set. Tables 1 and 2 will provide the edge partitioning based on COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45.
Table 1.
Edge partition of COF-JLU44.
| Edges | ![]() |
|---|---|
| (2, 2) | ![]() |
| (2, 3) | ![]() |
| (3, 3) | ![]() |
Table 2.
Edge partition of COF-JLU45.
| Edges | ![]() |
|---|---|
| (2, 2) | ![]() |
| (2, 3) | ![]() |
| (3, 3) | ![]() |
Degree-based topological indices are basic numerical invariants that describe molecular graph connectivity patterns. Table 3 lists the degree-based topological indices that were employed in this investigation41–47. These descriptions serve as a mathematical link between the frameworks’ physical manifestations and their abstract graph-theoretic form.
Table 3.
Degree-based topological indices.
| Topological index | Mathematical expression |
|---|---|
| Randić | ![]() |
| Reciprocal Randić | ![]() |
| Reduced Reciprocal Randić | ![]() |
| First Zagreb | ![]() |
| Second Zagreb | ![]() |
| Reduced Second Zagreb | ![]() |
| Hyper Zagreb | ![]() |
| Augmented Zagreb | ![]() |
| Harmonic | ![]() |
| Sum Connectivity | ![]() |
| Geometric Arithmetic | ![]() |
| Inverse Sum | ![]() |
| Albertson | ![]() |
| Symmetric Division | ![]() |
| Atom Bond Connectivity | ![]() |
| Forgotten | ![]() |
In this study, entropy calculations are performed using Shannon entropy. Shannon entropy, a statistical measure of the uncertainty or information content included in a discrete probability distribution, forms the foundation for the quantification of structural complexity in this work. The functional
![]() |
defines the entropy E(P) of a probability space
![]() |
This abstract measure is transferred onto the molecular framework in chemical graph theory by defining the probability space using degree-based topological indices24–26. A weight
is allocated to each edge
in the graph of the covalent organic framework based on a particular topological descriptor, like the Randić or Zagreb index, which represents the bond environment and local connectivity. We obtain the probability
for each edge by normalizing these weights against the graph’s total index value,
![]() |
This satisfies the normalization criterion
. Thus,
![]() |
is the expression for the Shannon entropy based on a topological index. A higher degree of topological symmetry and uniformity is indicated by a lower entropy value, whereas greater structural heterogeneity is indicated by a higher entropy value48–54. This equation enables a qualitative interpretation of structural organization. We can quantitatively differentiate the small differences in the
carbon-linked networks of COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45 by using this formalism, which connects mathematical“uncertainty”to the materials’ periodic order and physical robustness.
Results
In this section, generalized formulations of 15 degree-based topological indices for the molecular graphs of the COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45 are computed using the edge partitions given in Tables 1 and 2 which we express as the following Theorems.
Theorem 1
Let
denote molecular graph of COF-JLU44 with dimension
. Then,
Proof
Let
be COF-JLU44’s molecular graph. The partitioning of the edge set of
with respect to the vertex degree is employed in the formulation of degree-based topological indices to determine the following. 

Theorem 2
Let
denote molecular graph of COF-JLU45 with dimension
. Then,
Proof
Let
be COF-JLU45’s molecular graph. The partitioning of the edge set of
with respect to the vertex degree is employed in the formulation of degree-based topological indices to determine the following. 

Numerical computation of topological indces
In this section, we use the analytical expressions developed in Theorems 1 and 2 to calculate different degree-based topological indices in order to assess the structural evolution of COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45. We offer a quantitative trajectory of the frameworks’ connection by increasing the growth parameter n from 1 to 10. The outcomes are thoroughly described in Tables 4 and 5 and graphically examined in Figs. 3 and 4.
Table 4.
Numerical values for degree-based topological indices of COF-JLU44 for
to 10.
| n | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 100.5857 | 484.9286 | 1153.0286 | 2104.8857 | 3340.4999 | 4859.8714 | 6662.9999 | 8749.8856 | 11120.5284 | 13774.9284 |
| RR | 579.5143 | 2825.5714 | 6738.1713 | 12317.3141 | 19562.9997 | 28475.2281 | 39053.9994 | 51299.3135 | 65211.1704 | 80789.5701 |
| RRR | 333.5879 | 1631.9394 | 3895.0545 | 7122.9333 | 11315.5757 | 16472.9818 | 22595.1515 | 29682.0848 | 37733.7818 | 46750.2424 |
![]() |
1176 | 5736 | 13680 | 25008 | 39720 | 57816 | 79296 | 104160 | 132408 | 164040 |
![]() |
1416 | 6936 | 16560 | 30288 | 48120 | 70056 | 96096 | 126240 | 160488 | 198840 |
![]() |
480 | 2364 | 5652 | 10344 | 16440 | 23940 | 32844 | 43152 | 54864 | 67980 |
| HM | 5832 | 28584 | 68256 | 124848 | 198360 | 288792 | 396144 | 520416 | 661608 | 819720 |
| AZ | 2001.375 | 9718.875 | 23152.5 | 42302.25 | 67168.125 | 97750.125 | 134048.25 | 176062.5 | 223792.875 | 277239.375 |
| H | 99.2 | 478 | 1136.4 | 2074.4 | 3292 | 4789.2 | 6566 | 8622.4 | 10958.4 | 13574 |
| SC | 108.9298 | 526.6492 | 1253.1581 | 2288.4565 | 3632.5445 | 5285.4220 | 7247.0890 | 9517.5456 | 12096.7916 | 14984.8272 |
| GA | 236.6057 | 1147.0286 | 2731.2685 | 4989.3256 | 7921.1999 | 11526.8913 | 15806.3998 | 20759.7254 | 26386.8682 | 32687.8281 |
| IS | 285.6 | 1392 | 3319.2 | 6067.2 | 9636 | 14025.6 | 19236 | 25267.2 | 32119.2 | 39792 |
| SD | 508 | 2468 | 5880 | 10744 | 17060 | 24828 | 34048 | 44720 | 56844 | 70420 |
| ABC | 168.7351 | 818.2195 | 1948.4532 | 3559.4364 | 5651.1688 | 8223.6506 | 11276.8818 | 14810.8623 | 18825.5922 | 23321.0714 |
| F | 3000 | 14712 | 35136 | 64272 | 102120 | 148680 | 203952 | 267936 | 340632 | 422040 |
Table 5.
Numerical values for degree-based topological indices of COF-JLU45 for
to 10.
| n | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 86.9224 | 458.0735 | 1113.453 | 2053.0612 | 3276.8979 | 4784.9632 | 6577.2571 | 8653.7795 | 11014.5305 | 13659.51 |
| RR | 525.5347 | 2780.4408 | 6764.7183 | 12478.3672 | 19921.3875 | 29093.7792 | 39995.5423 | 52626.6768 | 66987.1828 | 83077.0601 |
| RRR | 309.0193 | 1635.6063 | 3979.761 | 7341.4834 | 11720.7734 | 17117.6312 | 23532.0565 | 30964.0496 | 39413.6104 | 48880.7388 |
![]() |
1064 | 5632 | 13704 | 25280 | 40360 | 58944 | 81032 | 106624 | 135720 | 168320 |
![]() |
1324 | 7008 | 17052 | 31456 | 50220 | 73344 | 100828 | 132672 | 168876 | 209440 |
![]() |
472 | 2496 | 6072 | 11200 | 17880 | 26112 | 35896 | 47232 | 60120 | 74560 |
| HM | 5424 | 28736 | 69936 | 129024 | 206000 | 300864 | 413616 | 544256 | 692784 | 859200 |
| AZ | 1845.1875 | 9719.5 | 23622.9375 | 43555.5 | 69517.1875 | 101508 | 139527.9375 | 183577 | 233655.1875 | 289762.5 |
| H | 85.8667 | 452.2667 | 1099.2 | 2026.6667 | 3234.6667 | 4723.2 | 6492.2667 | 8541.8667 | 10872 | 13482.6667 |
| SC | 95.2063 | 502.286 | 1221.2392 | 2252.0658 | 3594.7659 | 5249.3395 | 7215.7865 | 9494.107 | 12084.3009 | 14986.3683 |
| GA | 209.4139 | 1105.7763 | 2689.0873 | 4959.3469 | 7916.555 | 11560.7117 | 15891.8169 | 20909.8707 | 26614.8731 | 33006.824 |
| IS | 259.6 | 1372.8 | 3339.6 | 6160 | 9834 | 14361.6 | 19742.8 | 25977.6 | 33066 | 41008 |
| SD | 445.3333 | 2357.3333 | 5736 | 10581.3333 | 16893.3333 | 24672 | 33917.3333 | 44629.3333 | 56808 | 70453.3333 |
| ABC | 148.1273 | 782.901 | 1904.3212 | 3512.3879 | 5607.101 | 8188.4606 | 11256.4667 | 14811.1192 | 18852.4182 | 23380.3636 |
| F | 2776 | 14720 | 35832 | 66112 | 105560 | 154176 | 211960 | 278912 | 355032 | 440320 |
Fig. 3.

Graphical comparision of Topological indices of COF-JLU44.
Fig. 4.

Graphical comparision of Topological indices of COF-JLU45.
Entropy analysis
Numerical computation
The computation of Shannon entropy is demonstrated below by computing the entropy of COF-JLU44
using the Randić index.
Randić index entropy for COF-JLU44:
Let
denote COF-JLU44. The Randić index entropy is computed as follows:
![]() |
The generic entropy equations for each of the COFs would be too long to offer as Theorems. Apply the above approach to determine degree-based entropies for each topological index.
The structural entropy of COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45 is assessed in this section by varying the unit cell parameters n between 1 and 10. The numerical findings, which are shown graphically in Figs. 5 and 6 and described in depth in Tables 6 and 7, demonstrate a systematic evolution of structural information as the framework grows. To calculate these data and create a graphical representation, we utilized MATLAB. This comparative study offers a quantitative window into the topological uncertainty present in the
carbon-linked networks and goes beyond simple calculation. The importance of this approach is that it unravels the fluctuations of symmetry and connection density when the material moves from a molecular cluster to a bulk periodic structures. In the context of graph theory, this “uncertainty” is a stand-in for the amount of information needed to characterize the system’s connectivity; a framework with higher entropy usually has a more varied distribution of bond environments, which can affect the localized electronic density and exciton migration pathways during photocatalytic hydrogen evolution.
Fig. 5.

Graphical comparision of entropies of COF-JLU44.
Fig. 6.

Graphical comparision of entropies of COF-JLU45.
Table 6.
Numerical values for degree-based entropies of COF-JLU44.
| n | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ER | 5.474642 | 7.053961 | 7.921763 | 8.524395 | 8.986694 | 9.36187 | 9.677628 | 9.950247 | 10.190114 | 10.404262 |
| ERR | 5.474707 | 7.05403 | 7.92183 | 8.524462 | 8.986759 | 9.361935 | 9.677693 | 9.950312 | 10.190178 | 10.404326 |
| ERRR | 5.463333 | 7.043306 | 7.91128 | 8.513992 | 8.976336 | 9.351542 | 9.667321 | 9.939956 | 10.179834 | 10.393992 |
![]() |
5.474543 | 7.053938 | 7.921758 | 8.524398 | 8.9867 | 9.36188 | 9.67764 | 9.95026 | 10.190128 | 10.404277 |
![]() |
5.45696 | 7.037288 | 7.905357 | 8.508113 | 8.970482 | 9.345705 | 9.661496 | 9.934139 | 10.174024 | 10.388186 |
![]() |
5.411324 | 6.994037 | 7.862734 | 8.465779 | 8.928315 | 9.303646 | 9.619512 | 9.892212 | 10.13214 | 10.346337 |
| EHM | 5.456989 | 7.037578 | 7.905716 | 8.508503 | 8.970891 | 9.346125 | 9.661924 | 9.934574 | 10.174463 | 10.38863 |
| EAZ | 5.473883 | 7.052688 | 7.92035 | 8.522917 | 8.985178 | 9.36033 | 9.676071 | 9.948677 | 10.188533 | 10.402674 |
| EH | 5.474146 | 7.053542 | 7.921365 | 8.524007 | 8.986311 | 9.361492 | 9.677253 | 9.949874 | 10.189741 | 10.403891 |
| ESC | 5.479041 | 7.058125 | 7.925861 | 8.528462 | 8.990742 | 9.365907 | 9.681657 | 9.95427 | 10.194131 | 10.408275 |
| EGA | 5.480595 | 7.059576 | 7.927283 | 8.529871 | 8.992143 | 9.367303 | 9.683049 | 9.955659 | 10.195519 | 10.409662 |
| EIS | 5.474786 | 7.05404 | 7.921822 | 8.524445 | 8.986737 | 9.36191 | 9.677666 | 9.950283 | 10.190148 | 10.404294 |
| ESD | 5.479981 | 7.05899 | 7.926705 | 8.529296 | 8.991571 | 9.366732 | 9.682479 | 9.95509 | 10.19495 | 10.40909 |
| EABC | 5.480488 | 7.059462 | 7.927168 | 8.529755 | 8.992027 | 9.367187 | 9.682933 | 9.955543 | 10.195402 | 10.409545 |
| EF | 5.456702 | 7.037549 | 7.905753 | 8.508572 | 8.970977 | 9.346224 | 9.662031 | 9.934686 | 10.17458 | 10.38875 |
Table 7.
Numerical values for degree-based entropies of COF-JLU45.
| n | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ER | 5.348457 | 7.013468 | 7.902361 | 8.514541 | 8.982283 | 9.360979 | 9.679198 | 9.953635 | 10.194899 | 10.410155 |
| ERR | 5.348477 | 7.013486 | 7.902378 | 8.514556 | 8.982299 | 9.360993 | 9.679212 | 9.953649 | 10.194913 | 10.41017 |
| ERRR | 5.332997 | 6.998951 | 7.888063 | 8.500339 | 8.968137 | 9.346868 | 9.665112 | 9.939567 | 10.180845 | 10.396112 |
![]() |
5.34867 | 7.013702 | 7.9026 | 8.51478 | 8.982524 | 9.36122 | 9.679439 | 9.953877 | 10.195141 | 10.410398 |
![]() |
5.32438 | 6.990842 | 7.880073 | 8.492402 | 8.96023 | 9.338979 | 9.657237 | 9.931702 | 10.172988 | 10.388261 |
![]() |
5.264111 | 6.933794 | 7.823777 | 8.436441 | 8.904458 | 9.28333 | 9.601672 | 9.8762 | 10.117534 | 10.332845 |
| EHM | 5.325884 | 6.992413 | 7.881659 | 8.493995 | 8.961827 | 9.340579 | 9.658838 | 9.933305 | 10.174592 | 10.389866 |
| EAZ | 5.344918 | 7.009689 | 7.898527 | 8.510681 | 8.97841 | 9.357096 | 9.675309 | 9.949741 | 10.191002 | 10.406255 |
| EH | 5.348254 | 7.013298 | 7.9022 | 8.514382 | 8.982127 | 9.360824 | 9.679044 | 9.953482 | 10.194747 | 10.410003 |
| ESC | 5.354526 | 7.019161 | 7.907966 | 8.520106 | 8.987826 | 9.366507 | 9.684716 | 9.959146 | 10.200404 | 10.415656 |
| EGA | 5.356536 | 7.021035 | 7.909808 | 8.521933 | 8.989645 | 9.368321 | 9.686526 | 9.960953 | 10.20221 | 10.41746 |
| EIS | 5.348182 | 7.01317 | 7.902057 | 8.514234 | 8.981974 | 9.360669 | 9.678887 | 9.953323 | 10.194587 | 10.409843 |
| ESD | 5.355829 | 7.020347 | 7.909125 | 8.521252 | 8.988966 | 9.367642 | 9.685848 | 9.960275 | 10.201532 | 10.416783 |
| EABC | 5.356308 | 7.020813 | 7.909588 | 8.521713 | 8.989426 | 9.368102 | 9.686307 | 9.960734 | 10.201991 | 10.417241 |
| EF | 5.326939 | 6.993537 | 7.8828 | 8.495144 | 8.962979 | 9.341734 | 9.659995 | 9.934463 | 10.175751 | 10.391026 |
Comparitive discussion
The structural properties of covalent organic frameworks JLU44 and JLU45 were analysed by calculating the topological Shannon entropy values for the two systems based on their graph theoretic interpretations. In this context, entropy is used as a measure of topological heterogeneity in the molecular graph and is treated as a structural complexity metric rather than a thermodynamic property. High entropy values are related to high diversity in vertex connectivity, asymmetry, or non-uniform structure. Entropy values were computed for various topological indices upto ten-dimensional configurations. In all instances, JLU44 exhibited slightly higher entropy values than JLU45. For example, in the Randić index-based entropy, the mean value for JLU44 exceeded that of JLU45 by approximately 0.1 units, with similar differences exhibited for the remaining indices. Although the differences are relatively small in magnitude, they are uniform across several descriptors, which reveals a consistent difference in the structure between the two frameworks. The consistently higher entropy value in COF-JLU44 could be an indication of relatively more heterogeneous connectivity structure in the graph representation of COF-JLU44. Conversely, the lower entropy values for COF-JLU45 suggest a more uniform and regular topological arrangement. It must be noted that these interpretations are purely based on graph models and therefore refer to relative differences in structural organization rather than physical properties as measured by experiments. Although characteristics like enhanced pore diversity or flexible local environments may be associated with greater structural heterogeneity, these associations are primarily theoretical in the absence of experimental support. By contrast, a lower entropy value does not necessarily indicate a higher degree of thermodynamic stability, rigidity, or crystallinity. Therefore, the above findings should be viewed as a qualitative guide for topological structure rather than a predictive tool for material properties. From the above analysis, it can be concluded that COF-JLU44 has a slightly more complex structural topology than COF-JLU45, while COF-JLU45 has a relatively regular structure. The analysis shows that the topological metric of entropy can provide a useful guide for comparing the structural topology in covalent organic frameworks and can serve as a theoretical parameter for designing these COF architectures.
Conclusion
This study examines the degree-based topological indices of COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45, two covalent organic frameworks with unique structural characteristics. Shannon entropy was evaluated in order to gain a deeper quantitative understanding of the structural complexity, regularity, and potential stability of these two frameworks, building on the degree-based topological indices. Based on estimated entropy values, COF-JLU44 suggests a framework with increased configurational flexibility and structural diversity. In contrast, COF-JLU45 exhibits lower entropy values, indicating a more regular symmetric topological structure. This is typically associated with increased thermodynamic stability, stiffness, and maybe improved crystallinity. Overall, the comparative entropy study reveals that JLU45 has a more organized and thermodynamically resilient architecture, but JLU44 is notable for its structural adaptability and diversity. This work demonstrates the effectiveness of entropy-based metrics, which are obtained from degree-based topological indices, as useful instruments for differentiating between functionality and stability in the topological design of COFs. In order to comprehend the structural information, this analysis is restricted to the degree-based topological indices and the shannon entropy obtained from a concept of vetrex degree. The COFs’ spectural or distance effects on the structure have not been investigated. Thus, spectral graph descriptors (e.g., graph Laplacian eigenvalues), distance-based topological indices, and quantum-chemical parameters (e.g., band gaps, charge distribution, and frontier molecular orbitals) could be included in future research. Integrating these descriptors with entropy and degree-based measurements might improve QSPR models and offer a multiscale insight into structure property relationships in COFs. These can aid in the advancement of the function of information theoretic and graph theoretical techniques.
Acknowledgements
The authors express their gratitude to the Vellore Institute of Technology for their financial support and for providing a supportive research environment.
Author contributions
FS: Conceptualization; writing-original draft; methodology RS: Supervision; validation; conceptualization; writing- review and editing JK: Writing-original draft; software; investigation GKB: Visualization; software.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Vellore Institute of Technology. Not applicable.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Zhang, H. H., Zhan, G. P., Liu, Z. K. & Wu, C. D. Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution coupled with production of highly value-added organic chemicals by a composite photocatalyst CdInS@MIL-53-SONi. Chem. - Asian J.16(11), 1499–1506 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.He, T. et al. Integrated interfacial design of covalent organic framework photocatalysts to promote hydrogen evolution from water. Nat. Commun.14(1), 329 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Huang, W. et al. Highly crystalline and water-wettable benzobisthiazole-based covalent organic frameworks for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production. Natl. Sci. Rev.10(1), nwac171 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mokhtari, N., & Dinari, M. Photocatalysts based on covalent organic frameworks. In Covalent Organic Frameworks (pp. 287–302). CRC Press. (2022).
- 5.Zhang, Z. et al. Benzotrifuran-based donor–acceptor covalent organic frameworks for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Green Chemistry10.1039/d3gc04972h (2024).39553194 [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wan, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, D., and others. A data-driven search of two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks for visible-light-driven overall water splitting. ChemPhotoChem.10.1002/cptc.202400131 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 7.Covalent organic frameworks: synthesis and applications for photocatalysis. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c01956
- 8.Bai, J. et al. Topology-induced local electric polarization in 2D thiophene-based covalent organic frameworks for boosting photocatalytic H evolution. Chin. J. Catal.59, 225–236 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chu, Y. M., Muhammad, M. H., Rauf, A., Ishtiaq, M. & Siddiqui, M. K. Topological study of polycyclic graphite carbon nitride. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd.42(6), 3203–3215 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pan, J. et al. Recent progress in photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica36(3), 1905068 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang, G., Lan, Z. A. & Wang, X. Conjugated polymers: Catalysts for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Angew. Chem. - Int. Ed.55(51), 15712–15727 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang, X. et al. Sulfone-containing covalent organic frameworks for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water. Nat. Chem.10(12), 1180–1189 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zong, J., Liu, H., Lian, W., Dai, L. & Li, P. The enhancement of photocatalytic hydrogen evolution in imine-linked pyrene-based covalent organic frameworks through the regulation of active site distances. J. Mater. Chem. A13(8), 6095–6101 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Du, X. et al. Covalent organic framework without cocatalyst loading for efficient photocatalytic sacrificial hydrogen production from water. Nat. Commun.16(1), 3024 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Spies, L. et al. Designing atomically precise and robust COF hybrids for efficient photocatalytic CO_2 reduction. Small (26), 10.1002/smll.202500550 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Ma, S. et al. Fully conjugated benzobisoxazole-bridged covalent organic frameworks for boosting photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Angew. Chem.137(19), e202501869 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhou, T. et al. PEG-stabilized coaxial stacking of two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Nat. Commun.12(1), 3934 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen, R. et al. Rational design of isostructural 2D porphyrin-based covalent organic frameworks for tunable photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Nat. Commun.12(1), 1354 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Trinajstić, N. Chemical graph theory (CRC Press, 2018).
- 20.Bonchev, D. Chemical graph theory: Introduction and fundamentals. Routledge (2018).
- 21.Balaban, A. T. Applications of graph theory in chemistry. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.25(3), 334–343 (1985). [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gutman, I. Degree-based topological indices. Croat. Chem. Acta86(4), 351–361 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gutman, I. On the origin of two degree-based topological indices. Bulletin (Académie serbe des sciences et des arts. Classe des sciences mathématiques et naturelles. Sciences mathématiques), 39, 39–52 (2014).
- 24.Shannon, C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J.27(3), 379–423 (1948). [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zuo, X., Shooshtari, H. & Cancan, M. Entropy measures of topological indices-based molecular structure of benzenoid systems. Polycycl. Aromat. Comp.44(5), 2980–2990 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mowshowitz, A. & Dehmer, M. Entropy and the complexity of graphs revisited. Entropy14(3), 559–570 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sabirov, D. S. & Shepelevich, I. S. Information entropy in chemistry: An overview. Entropy23(10), 1240 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dehmer, M. & Mowshowitz, A. A history of graph entropy measures. Info. Sci.181(1), 57–78 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 29.Omar, Y. M. & Plapper, P. A survey of information entropy metrics for complex networks. Entropy22(12), 1417 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rashevsky, N. Life, information theory, and topology. Bull. Math. Biophys.17(3), 229–235 (1955). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mowshowitz, A. Entropy and the complexity of graphs: I. An index of the relative complexity of a graph. Bull. Math. Biophys.30(1), 175–204. (1968). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 32.Dehmer, M. Information processing in complex networks: Graph entropy and information functionals. Appl. Math. Comput.201(1–2), 82–94 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kazemi, R. Entropy of weighted graphs with the degree-based topological indices as weights. MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry76(1), 69–80 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jyothish, K. & Roy, S. Topological characterization of [n]-triangulenes through degree-based molecular descriptors with the prediction to -electron energy. Physica Scripta100(1), 015266 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gayathri, K. B. & Roy, S. Comparative QSPR study of food preservatives using topological indices and regression models. Sci. Rep.15(1), 24557 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gutman, I. & Trinajstić, N. Graph theory and molecular orbitals. In New concepts II 49–93 (Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2005).
- 37.Gayathri, K. B., Santiago, R., & Govardhan, S. Hexagonal fractals: Topological indices, fractal dimensions, structure-property modeling and its applications. Curr. Org. Synth.22(7), 811–820 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 38.Jyothish, K. & Santiago, R. Quantitative structure–property relationship modeling with the prediction of physicochemical properties of some novel Duchenne muscular dystrophy drugs. ACS Omega10(4), 3640–3651 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.DS, A., Julietraja, K., Jaganathan, B. & Alsinai, A. Curcumin-conjugated PAMAM dendrimers of two generations: comparative analysis of physiochemical properties using Adriatic topological indices. ACS Omega9(12), 14558–14579 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 40.Julietraja, K. & Venugopal, P. Computation of degree-based topological descriptors using M-polynomial for coronoid systems. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd.42(4), 1770–1793 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhou, B. & Trinajstić, N. On a novel connectivity index. J. Math. Chem.46, 1252–1270 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ali, A., Raza, Z. & Bhatti, A. A. On the augmented Zagreb index. arXiv preprint arXiv:1402.3078. (2014).
- 43.Gutman, I., Furtula, B. & Elphick, C. Three new/old vertex-degree-based topological indices. MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry. (2014).
- 44.Furtula, B. & Gutman, I. A forgotten topological index. J. Math. Chem.53(4), 1184–1190 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhong, L. The harmonic index for graphs. Appl. Math. Lett.25(3), 561–566 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 46.Furtula, B., Gutman, I. & Ediz, S. On difference of Zagreb indices. Discrete Appl. Math.178, 83–88 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shirdel, G. H., Rezapour, H. & Sayadi, A. M. The hyper-Zagreb index of graph operations. Appl. Math.4(2), 47–56 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 48.Manzoor, S., Siddiqui, M. K. & Ahmad, S. On entropy measures of molecular graphs using topological indices. Arab. J. Chem.13(8), 6285–6298 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chu, Y. M., Julietraja, K., Venugopal, P., Siddiqui, M. K. & Prabhu, S. Degree- and irregularity-based molecular descriptors for benzenoid systems. Eur. Phys. J. Plus136(1), 1–17 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 50.Julietraja, K., Venugopal, P., Prabhu, S., Arulmozhi, A. K. & Siddiqui, M. K. Structural analysis of three types of PAHs using entropy measures. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd.42(7), 4101–4131 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shanmukha, M. C., Gowtham, K. J., Usha, A. & Julietraja, K. Expected values of Sombor indices and their entropy measures for graphene. Mol. Phys.122(10), e2276905 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xu, S. A. & Liu, J. B. Entropies and degree-based topological indices of coronene fractal structures. Fractal Fract.9(3), 133 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yang, J., Konsalraj, J. & Raja, S. A. A. Neighbourhood sum degree-based indices and entropy measures for certain family of graphene molecules. Molecules28(1), 168 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Alam, M. A. et al. Degree-based entropy for a non-Kekulean benzenoid graph. J. Math.2022(1), 2288207 (2022). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.








































































