Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2026 Apr 30;16:20078. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-49423-0

Comparative structural analysis of certain covalent organic frameworks through entropy and degree-based topological indices

Flemin Sajeev 1, Roy S 1,✉, Jyothish K 1, Gayathri K B 1
PMCID: PMC13324030  PMID: 42062435

Abstract

Topological indices are graph invariants of the molecular graph that facilitate the study of structural characteristics pertaining to connectivity and shape. This paper addresses the application of degree-based topological indices coupled with Shannon entropy to analyze the structural features of covalent organic frameworks JLU44 and JLU45. Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs) are a class of crystelline, porus organic polymers characterized by strong covalent linages between their building blocks. The study addresses the complexity and uncertainties inherent in molecular structures by pinpointing graph-theoretical metrics, effectively representing the connectivity and interaction dynamics among the molecules. The utilization of Shannon entropy derived from topological indices improves the understanding of structural information, aiding in the comparative analysis of the frameworks’ structural characteristics. This demonstrates the efficiency of entropy-based metrics in measuring molecular complexity and highlights the value of topological descriptors in furthering the investigation of chemically relevant graph structures.

Keywords: Topological indices, Shannon entropy, Covalent organic frameworks, Molecular graph, Edge-partitioning method

Subject terms: Chemistry, Materials science, Mathematics and computing

Introduction

Hydrogen energy is the most promising alternative to fossil fuels, providing a clean, high density energy transporter that emits only water as a byproduct after burning1. The need for effective hydrogen generation technology to power fuel cells, industrial operations, and transportation has increased as the world moves toward sustainable energy systems. Since sunlight and water are two of the most plentiful renewable resources on Earth, photocatalytic water splitting technology is thought to be the most promising of the many generating methods since it directly transforms solar energy into chemical energy2,3.

Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution is the process of creating hydrogen gas with water, light mostly sunlight and a photocatalyst. By absorbing photons to create electron hole pairs, which then move to the surface to propel the reduction of water into hydrogen gas, the photocatalyst plays a crucial part in this process. Researchers have concentrated on creating materials with great structural stability, effective charge separation, and broad light absorption in order to optimize efficiency. Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs), a novel type of crystalline, porous polymers for photocatalysis, have drawn a lot of interest recently4–8. They are perfect candidates for hydrogen evolution because to their huge surface areas, extended Inline graphic-conjugation, and highly adjustable architectures9–11.In particular, there has been considerable promise in the creation of completely conjugated, benzobisoxazole-bridged COFs. Wang et al. constructed OZBT-COF and investigated its use in photocatalytic organic transformations based on its recyclability and stability12. Zong et al. used nitrogen site engineering to optimize pyrene-based Py-COF variants to improve hydrogen production13. Du et al. created a cocatalyst-free Inline graphic-ketoenamine Tp-Py-COF to generate sacrificial hydrogen from water14. Li et al. developed Re(I)-decorated dibenzochrysene COF hybrids to reduce COInline graphic to CO15. The two most notable instances of this class are COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45,introduced by Si Ma et al. two novel benzobisoxazole-bridged, spInline graphic carbon linked 2D-COFs, which differ mainly in their aromatic core units, pyrene for COF-JLU45 and triazine for COF-JLU4416–18.

Despite their success in experiments, a more detailed, mathematical understanding of the structural distinctions between these frameworks is crucial. The inherent complexity and information content of these periodic networks are frequently not adequately captured by qualitative definitions of“conjugation”and“porosity.” In order to close this gap, the complicated molecular graphs of COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45 are transformed into distinct numerical descriptors using degree-based topological indices19–23. Additionally, we use these indices to determine the frameworks’ Shannon entropy. The idea of Shannon entropy was initially laid out by Claude Shannon in his seminal work which was published in 194824. Entropy provides a theoretical foundation for forecasting features like graph energy and thermal stability in chemical graph theory by acting as a potent metric to measure structural disorder, complexity, and the distribution of vertex degrees25–29. The graph entropy based on vertex orbit was first presented by Rashevsky in 195530. This was utilized by Mowshowitz for a few graph operations31. Dehmer investigated the inequalities derived from the graph entropies and vertex probability32. Ramin Kazemi used degree-based topological indices to calculate entropy on weighted graphs33.

The aim of this study is to analyze the chemical structures of COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45. It is started by calculating their degree-based edge partitions. Subsequently, various degree-based topological indices are computed for these molecules. Later, the Shannon entropies of the structures are determined, enabling a comparative analysis between the two frameworks. Graph entropy provides a tool to calculate the uncertainty inherent in the structural configurations that helps to effectively model connectivity information based on edge degrees and interactions. Through the examination of these entropy metrics, the study seeks to identify differences in structural information content that may correspond to variations in chemical and physical properties in which the best network can be found between the two. This approach not only helps in assessing the complexity of these covalent organic frameworks but also offers deeper insights into how topological indices influence entropy in chemically significant graphs.

Materials and methods

The study analyzes the structural topology and organic linkers of the covalent organic frameworks JLU44 and JLU45. JLU44 has triazine units, whereas JLU45 contains pyrene units in its core structure. Both frameworks are generated using Knoevenagel polycondensation, which produces long-range structured crystalline structures with surface areas and photoelectric characteristics. The inclusion of pyrene and platinum allows the COF JLU-45 to absorb hydrogen across a wide range. JLU-45 acts as a metal-free photocatalyst, relying solely on sunlight to perform the chemical reaction that produces hydrogen fuel, making hydrogen fuel production more sustainable and reliable.

Let Inline graphic be a simple undirected molecular graph, Inline graphic and Inline graphic represent the vertex set and edge set respectively. Let Inline graphic and Inline graphic be a vertices such that Inline graphic then, Inline graphic and Inline graphic are said to be neighbours if there exists an edge Inline graphic connecting them. The degree of vertex Inline graphic is said to be the total number of neighbours of Inline graphic. It is denoted by Inline graphic34–36. Figures 1 and 2 represent the molecular graph of COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45 respectively. Through out the paper, Inline graphic is regarded as a size metric indicative of the growth of the COF structures. Inline graphic refers to the growth of extended spInline graphic-conjugated framework, resulting in larger domain sizes, longer Inline graphic- delocalization pathways, and higher structural complexity, which is relevant to photocatalytic function.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Molecular graph of COF-JLU44.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Molecular graph of COF-JLU45.

In this study the degree-based edge partition method is used and is done by calculating the degrees of vertices and considering the adjacent edges. Let Inline graphic and Inline graphic be degrees of vertices Inline graphic and Inline graphic respectively such that Inline graphic then,

graphic file with name d33e662.gif 1

Edge partitioning involves classifying edges based on the degree of their end vertices37–40. Later, we classify them into sets based on edges with the same degree composition and calculate the cardinality of each set. Tables 1 and 2 will provide the edge partitioning based on COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45.

Table 1.

Edge partition of COF-JLU44.

Edges Inline graphic
(2, 2) Inline graphic
(2, 3) Inline graphic
(3, 3) Inline graphic

Table 2.

Edge partition of COF-JLU45.

Edges Inline graphic
(2, 2) Inline graphic
(2, 3) Inline graphic
(3, 3) Inline graphic

Degree-based topological indices are basic numerical invariants that describe molecular graph connectivity patterns. Table 3 lists the degree-based topological indices that were employed in this investigation41–47. These descriptions serve as a mathematical link between the frameworks’ physical manifestations and their abstract graph-theoretic form.

Table 3.

Degree-based topological indices.

Topological index Mathematical expression
Randić Inline graphic
Reciprocal Randić Inline graphic
Reduced Reciprocal Randić Inline graphic
First Zagreb Inline graphic
Second Zagreb Inline graphic
Reduced Second Zagreb Inline graphic
Hyper Zagreb Inline graphic
Augmented Zagreb Inline graphic
Harmonic Inline graphic
Sum Connectivity Inline graphic
Geometric Arithmetic Inline graphic
Inverse Sum Inline graphic
Albertson Inline graphic
Symmetric Division Inline graphic
Atom Bond Connectivity Inline graphic
Forgotten Inline graphic

In this study, entropy calculations are performed using Shannon entropy. Shannon entropy, a statistical measure of the uncertainty or information content included in a discrete probability distribution, forms the foundation for the quantification of structural complexity in this work. The functional

graphic file with name d33e694.gif

defines the entropy E(P) of a probability space

graphic file with name d33e704.gif

This abstract measure is transferred onto the molecular framework in chemical graph theory by defining the probability space using degree-based topological indices24–26. A weight Inline graphic is allocated to each edge Inline graphic in the graph of the covalent organic framework based on a particular topological descriptor, like the Randić or Zagreb index, which represents the bond environment and local connectivity. We obtain the probability Inline graphic for each edge by normalizing these weights against the graph’s total index value,

graphic file with name d33e728.gif

This satisfies the normalization criterion Inline graphic. Thus,

graphic file with name d33e736.gif

is the expression for the Shannon entropy based on a topological index. A higher degree of topological symmetry and uniformity is indicated by a lower entropy value, whereas greater structural heterogeneity is indicated by a higher entropy value48–54. This equation enables a qualitative interpretation of structural organization. We can quantitatively differentiate the small differences in the Inline graphic carbon-linked networks of COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45 by using this formalism, which connects mathematical“uncertainty”to the materials’ periodic order and physical robustness.

Results

In this section, generalized formulations of 15 degree-based topological indices for the molecular graphs of the COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45 are computed using the edge partitions given in Tables 1 and 2 which we express as the following Theorems.

Theorem 1

Let Inline graphic denote molecular graph of COF-JLU44 with dimension Inline graphic. Then,

  1. Inline graphic

  2. Inline graphic

  3. Inline graphic

  4. Inline graphic

  5. Inline graphic

  6. Inline graphic

  7. Inline graphic

  8. Inline graphic

  9. Inline graphic

  10. Inline graphic

  11. Inline graphic

  12. Inline graphic

  13. Inline graphic

  14. Inline graphic

  15. Inline graphic

Proof

Let Inline graphic be COF-JLU44’s molecular graph. The partitioning of the edge set of Inline graphic with respect to the vertex degree is employed in the formulation of degree-based topological indices to determine the following. Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic Inline graphic

Theorem 2

Let Inline graphic denote molecular graph of COF-JLU45 with dimension Inline graphic. Then,

  1. Inline graphic

  2. Inline graphic

  3. Inline graphic

  4. Inline graphic

  5. Inline graphic

  6. Inline graphic

  7. Inline graphic

  8. Inline graphic

  9. Inline graphic

  10. Inline graphic

  11. Inline graphic

  12. Inline graphic

  13. Inline graphic

  14. Inline graphic

  15. Inline graphic

Proof

Let Inline graphic be COF-JLU45’s molecular graph. The partitioning of the edge set of Inline graphic with respect to the vertex degree is employed in the formulation of degree-based topological indices to determine the following. Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Inline graphic Inline graphic

Numerical computation of topological indces

In this section, we use the analytical expressions developed in Theorems 1 and 2 to calculate different degree-based topological indices in order to assess the structural evolution of COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45. We offer a quantitative trajectory of the frameworks’ connection by increasing the growth parameter n from 1 to 10. The outcomes are thoroughly described in Tables 4 and 5 and graphically examined in Figs. 3 and 4.

Table 4.

Numerical values for degree-based topological indices of COF-JLU44 for Inline graphic to 10.

n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
R 100.5857 484.9286 1153.0286 2104.8857 3340.4999 4859.8714 6662.9999 8749.8856 11120.5284 13774.9284
RR 579.5143 2825.5714 6738.1713 12317.3141 19562.9997 28475.2281 39053.9994 51299.3135 65211.1704 80789.5701
RRR 333.5879 1631.9394 3895.0545 7122.9333 11315.5757 16472.9818 22595.1515 29682.0848 37733.7818 46750.2424
Inline graphic 1176 5736 13680 25008 39720 57816 79296 104160 132408 164040
Inline graphic 1416 6936 16560 30288 48120 70056 96096 126240 160488 198840
Inline graphic 480 2364 5652 10344 16440 23940 32844 43152 54864 67980
HM 5832 28584 68256 124848 198360 288792 396144 520416 661608 819720
AZ 2001.375 9718.875 23152.5 42302.25 67168.125 97750.125 134048.25 176062.5 223792.875 277239.375
H 99.2 478 1136.4 2074.4 3292 4789.2 6566 8622.4 10958.4 13574
SC 108.9298 526.6492 1253.1581 2288.4565 3632.5445 5285.4220 7247.0890 9517.5456 12096.7916 14984.8272
GA 236.6057 1147.0286 2731.2685 4989.3256 7921.1999 11526.8913 15806.3998 20759.7254 26386.8682 32687.8281
IS 285.6 1392 3319.2 6067.2 9636 14025.6 19236 25267.2 32119.2 39792
SD 508 2468 5880 10744 17060 24828 34048 44720 56844 70420
ABC 168.7351 818.2195 1948.4532 3559.4364 5651.1688 8223.6506 11276.8818 14810.8623 18825.5922 23321.0714
F 3000 14712 35136 64272 102120 148680 203952 267936 340632 422040

Table 5.

Numerical values for degree-based topological indices of COF-JLU45 for Inline graphic to 10.

n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
R 86.9224 458.0735 1113.453 2053.0612 3276.8979 4784.9632 6577.2571 8653.7795 11014.5305 13659.51
RR 525.5347 2780.4408 6764.7183 12478.3672 19921.3875 29093.7792 39995.5423 52626.6768 66987.1828 83077.0601
RRR 309.0193 1635.6063 3979.761 7341.4834 11720.7734 17117.6312 23532.0565 30964.0496 39413.6104 48880.7388
Inline graphic 1064 5632 13704 25280 40360 58944 81032 106624 135720 168320
Inline graphic 1324 7008 17052 31456 50220 73344 100828 132672 168876 209440
Inline graphic 472 2496 6072 11200 17880 26112 35896 47232 60120 74560
HM 5424 28736 69936 129024 206000 300864 413616 544256 692784 859200
AZ 1845.1875 9719.5 23622.9375 43555.5 69517.1875 101508 139527.9375 183577 233655.1875 289762.5
H 85.8667 452.2667 1099.2 2026.6667 3234.6667 4723.2 6492.2667 8541.8667 10872 13482.6667
SC 95.2063 502.286 1221.2392 2252.0658 3594.7659 5249.3395 7215.7865 9494.107 12084.3009 14986.3683
GA 209.4139 1105.7763 2689.0873 4959.3469 7916.555 11560.7117 15891.8169 20909.8707 26614.8731 33006.824
IS 259.6 1372.8 3339.6 6160 9834 14361.6 19742.8 25977.6 33066 41008
SD 445.3333 2357.3333 5736 10581.3333 16893.3333 24672 33917.3333 44629.3333 56808 70453.3333
ABC 148.1273 782.901 1904.3212 3512.3879 5607.101 8188.4606 11256.4667 14811.1192 18852.4182 23380.3636
F 2776 14720 35832 66112 105560 154176 211960 278912 355032 440320

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Graphical comparision of Topological indices of COF-JLU44.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Graphical comparision of Topological indices of COF-JLU45.

Entropy analysis

Numerical computation

The computation of Shannon entropy is demonstrated below by computing the entropy of COF-JLU44 Inline graphic using the Randić index.

Randić index entropy for COF-JLU44:

Let Inline graphic denote COF-JLU44. The Randić index entropy is computed as follows:

graphic file with name d33e2179.gif

The generic entropy equations for each of the COFs would be too long to offer as Theorems. Apply the above approach to determine degree-based entropies for each topological index.

The structural entropy of COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45 is assessed in this section by varying the unit cell parameters n between 1 and 10. The numerical findings, which are shown graphically in Figs. 5 and 6 and described in depth in Tables 6 and 7, demonstrate a systematic evolution of structural information as the framework grows. To calculate these data and create a graphical representation, we utilized MATLAB. This comparative study offers a quantitative window into the topological uncertainty present in the Inline graphic carbon-linked networks and goes beyond simple calculation. The importance of this approach is that it unravels the fluctuations of symmetry and connection density when the material moves from a molecular cluster to a bulk periodic structures. In the context of graph theory, this “uncertainty” is a stand-in for the amount of information needed to characterize the system’s connectivity; a framework with higher entropy usually has a more varied distribution of bond environments, which can affect the localized electronic density and exciton migration pathways during photocatalytic hydrogen evolution.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Graphical comparision of entropies of COF-JLU44.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Graphical comparision of entropies of COF-JLU45.

Table 6.

Numerical values for degree-based entropies of COF-JLU44.

n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
ER 5.474642 7.053961 7.921763 8.524395 8.986694 9.36187 9.677628 9.950247 10.190114 10.404262
ERR 5.474707 7.05403 7.92183 8.524462 8.986759 9.361935 9.677693 9.950312 10.190178 10.404326
ERRR 5.463333 7.043306 7.91128 8.513992 8.976336 9.351542 9.667321 9.939956 10.179834 10.393992
Inline graphic 5.474543 7.053938 7.921758 8.524398 8.9867 9.36188 9.67764 9.95026 10.190128 10.404277
Inline graphic 5.45696 7.037288 7.905357 8.508113 8.970482 9.345705 9.661496 9.934139 10.174024 10.388186
Inline graphic 5.411324 6.994037 7.862734 8.465779 8.928315 9.303646 9.619512 9.892212 10.13214 10.346337
EHM 5.456989 7.037578 7.905716 8.508503 8.970891 9.346125 9.661924 9.934574 10.174463 10.38863
EAZ 5.473883 7.052688 7.92035 8.522917 8.985178 9.36033 9.676071 9.948677 10.188533 10.402674
EH 5.474146 7.053542 7.921365 8.524007 8.986311 9.361492 9.677253 9.949874 10.189741 10.403891
ESC 5.479041 7.058125 7.925861 8.528462 8.990742 9.365907 9.681657 9.95427 10.194131 10.408275
EGA 5.480595 7.059576 7.927283 8.529871 8.992143 9.367303 9.683049 9.955659 10.195519 10.409662
EIS 5.474786 7.05404 7.921822 8.524445 8.986737 9.36191 9.677666 9.950283 10.190148 10.404294
ESD 5.479981 7.05899 7.926705 8.529296 8.991571 9.366732 9.682479 9.95509 10.19495 10.40909
EABC 5.480488 7.059462 7.927168 8.529755 8.992027 9.367187 9.682933 9.955543 10.195402 10.409545
EF 5.456702 7.037549 7.905753 8.508572 8.970977 9.346224 9.662031 9.934686 10.17458 10.38875

Table 7.

Numerical values for degree-based entropies of COF-JLU45.

n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
ER 5.348457 7.013468 7.902361 8.514541 8.982283 9.360979 9.679198 9.953635 10.194899 10.410155
ERR 5.348477 7.013486 7.902378 8.514556 8.982299 9.360993 9.679212 9.953649 10.194913 10.41017
ERRR 5.332997 6.998951 7.888063 8.500339 8.968137 9.346868 9.665112 9.939567 10.180845 10.396112
Inline graphic 5.34867 7.013702 7.9026 8.51478 8.982524 9.36122 9.679439 9.953877 10.195141 10.410398
Inline graphic 5.32438 6.990842 7.880073 8.492402 8.96023 9.338979 9.657237 9.931702 10.172988 10.388261
Inline graphic 5.264111 6.933794 7.823777 8.436441 8.904458 9.28333 9.601672 9.8762 10.117534 10.332845
EHM 5.325884 6.992413 7.881659 8.493995 8.961827 9.340579 9.658838 9.933305 10.174592 10.389866
EAZ 5.344918 7.009689 7.898527 8.510681 8.97841 9.357096 9.675309 9.949741 10.191002 10.406255
EH 5.348254 7.013298 7.9022 8.514382 8.982127 9.360824 9.679044 9.953482 10.194747 10.410003
ESC 5.354526 7.019161 7.907966 8.520106 8.987826 9.366507 9.684716 9.959146 10.200404 10.415656
EGA 5.356536 7.021035 7.909808 8.521933 8.989645 9.368321 9.686526 9.960953 10.20221 10.41746
EIS 5.348182 7.01317 7.902057 8.514234 8.981974 9.360669 9.678887 9.953323 10.194587 10.409843
ESD 5.355829 7.020347 7.909125 8.521252 8.988966 9.367642 9.685848 9.960275 10.201532 10.416783
EABC 5.356308 7.020813 7.909588 8.521713 8.989426 9.368102 9.686307 9.960734 10.201991 10.417241
EF 5.326939 6.993537 7.8828 8.495144 8.962979 9.341734 9.659995 9.934463 10.175751 10.391026

Comparitive discussion

The structural properties of covalent organic frameworks JLU44 and JLU45 were analysed by calculating the topological Shannon entropy values for the two systems based on their graph theoretic interpretations. In this context, entropy is used as a measure of topological heterogeneity in the molecular graph and is treated as a structural complexity metric rather than a thermodynamic property. High entropy values are related to high diversity in vertex connectivity, asymmetry, or non-uniform structure. Entropy values were computed for various topological indices upto ten-dimensional configurations. In all instances, JLU44 exhibited slightly higher entropy values than JLU45. For example, in the Randić index-based entropy, the mean value for JLU44 exceeded that of JLU45 by approximately 0.1 units, with similar differences exhibited for the remaining indices. Although the differences are relatively small in magnitude, they are uniform across several descriptors, which reveals a consistent difference in the structure between the two frameworks. The consistently higher entropy value in COF-JLU44 could be an indication of relatively more heterogeneous connectivity structure in the graph representation of COF-JLU44. Conversely, the lower entropy values for COF-JLU45 suggest a more uniform and regular topological arrangement. It must be noted that these interpretations are purely based on graph models and therefore refer to relative differences in structural organization rather than physical properties as measured by experiments. Although characteristics like enhanced pore diversity or flexible local environments may be associated with greater structural heterogeneity, these associations are primarily theoretical in the absence of experimental support. By contrast, a lower entropy value does not necessarily indicate a higher degree of thermodynamic stability, rigidity, or crystallinity. Therefore, the above findings should be viewed as a qualitative guide for topological structure rather than a predictive tool for material properties. From the above analysis, it can be concluded that COF-JLU44 has a slightly more complex structural topology than COF-JLU45, while COF-JLU45 has a relatively regular structure. The analysis shows that the topological metric of entropy can provide a useful guide for comparing the structural topology in covalent organic frameworks and can serve as a theoretical parameter for designing these COF architectures.

Conclusion

This study examines the degree-based topological indices of COF-JLU44 and COF-JLU45, two covalent organic frameworks with unique structural characteristics. Shannon entropy was evaluated in order to gain a deeper quantitative understanding of the structural complexity, regularity, and potential stability of these two frameworks, building on the degree-based topological indices. Based on estimated entropy values, COF-JLU44 suggests a framework with increased configurational flexibility and structural diversity. In contrast, COF-JLU45 exhibits lower entropy values, indicating a more regular symmetric topological structure. This is typically associated with increased thermodynamic stability, stiffness, and maybe improved crystallinity. Overall, the comparative entropy study reveals that JLU45 has a more organized and thermodynamically resilient architecture, but JLU44 is notable for its structural adaptability and diversity. This work demonstrates the effectiveness of entropy-based metrics, which are obtained from degree-based topological indices, as useful instruments for differentiating between functionality and stability in the topological design of COFs. In order to comprehend the structural information, this analysis is restricted to the degree-based topological indices and the shannon entropy obtained from a concept of vetrex degree. The COFs’ spectural or distance effects on the structure have not been investigated. Thus, spectral graph descriptors (e.g., graph Laplacian eigenvalues), distance-based topological indices, and quantum-chemical parameters (e.g., band gaps, charge distribution, and frontier molecular orbitals) could be included in future research. Integrating these descriptors with entropy and degree-based measurements might improve QSPR models and offer a multiscale insight into structure property relationships in COFs. These can aid in the advancement of the function of information theoretic and graph theoretical techniques.

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to the Vellore Institute of Technology for their financial support and for providing a supportive research environment.

Author contributions

FS: Conceptualization; writing-original draft; methodology RS: Supervision; validation; conceptualization; writing- review and editing JK: Writing-original draft; software; investigation GKB: Visualization; software.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Vellore Institute of Technology. Not applicable.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Zhang, H. H., Zhan, G. P., Liu, Z. K. & Wu, C. D. Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution coupled with production of highly value-added organic chemicals by a composite photocatalyst CdInS@MIL-53-SONi. Chem. - Asian J.16(11), 1499–1506 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.He, T. et al. Integrated interfacial design of covalent organic framework photocatalysts to promote hydrogen evolution from water. Nat. Commun.14(1), 329 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Huang, W. et al. Highly crystalline and water-wettable benzobisthiazole-based covalent organic frameworks for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production. Natl. Sci. Rev.10(1), nwac171 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mokhtari, N., & Dinari, M. Photocatalysts based on covalent organic frameworks. In Covalent Organic Frameworks (pp. 287–302). CRC Press. (2022).
  • 5.Zhang, Z. et al. Benzotrifuran-based donor–acceptor covalent organic frameworks for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Green Chemistry10.1039/d3gc04972h (2024).39553194 [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wan, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, D., and others. A data-driven search of two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks for visible-light-driven overall water splitting. ChemPhotoChem.10.1002/cptc.202400131 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7.Covalent organic frameworks: synthesis and applications for photocatalysis. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c01956
  • 8.Bai, J. et al. Topology-induced local electric polarization in 2D thiophene-based covalent organic frameworks for boosting photocatalytic H evolution. Chin. J. Catal.59, 225–236 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chu, Y. M., Muhammad, M. H., Rauf, A., Ishtiaq, M. & Siddiqui, M. K. Topological study of polycyclic graphite carbon nitride. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd.42(6), 3203–3215 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pan, J. et al. Recent progress in photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica36(3), 1905068 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang, G., Lan, Z. A. & Wang, X. Conjugated polymers: Catalysts for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Angew. Chem. - Int. Ed.55(51), 15712–15727 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang, X. et al. Sulfone-containing covalent organic frameworks for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water. Nat. Chem.10(12), 1180–1189 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zong, J., Liu, H., Lian, W., Dai, L. & Li, P. The enhancement of photocatalytic hydrogen evolution in imine-linked pyrene-based covalent organic frameworks through the regulation of active site distances. J. Mater. Chem. A13(8), 6095–6101 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Du, X. et al. Covalent organic framework without cocatalyst loading for efficient photocatalytic sacrificial hydrogen production from water. Nat. Commun.16(1), 3024 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Spies, L. et al. Designing atomically precise and robust COF hybrids for efficient photocatalytic CO_2 reduction. Small (26), 10.1002/smll.202500550 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 16.Ma, S. et al. Fully conjugated benzobisoxazole-bridged covalent organic frameworks for boosting photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Angew. Chem.137(19), e202501869 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhou, T. et al. PEG-stabilized coaxial stacking of two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Nat. Commun.12(1), 3934 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen, R. et al. Rational design of isostructural 2D porphyrin-based covalent organic frameworks for tunable photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Nat. Commun.12(1), 1354 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Trinajstić, N. Chemical graph theory (CRC Press, 2018).
  • 20.Bonchev, D. Chemical graph theory: Introduction and fundamentals. Routledge (2018).
  • 21.Balaban, A. T. Applications of graph theory in chemistry. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.25(3), 334–343 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gutman, I. Degree-based topological indices. Croat. Chem. Acta86(4), 351–361 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gutman, I. On the origin of two degree-based topological indices. Bulletin (Académie serbe des sciences et des arts. Classe des sciences mathématiques et naturelles. Sciences mathématiques), 39, 39–52 (2014).
  • 24.Shannon, C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J.27(3), 379–423 (1948). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zuo, X., Shooshtari, H. & Cancan, M. Entropy measures of topological indices-based molecular structure of benzenoid systems. Polycycl. Aromat. Comp.44(5), 2980–2990 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mowshowitz, A. & Dehmer, M. Entropy and the complexity of graphs revisited. Entropy14(3), 559–570 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sabirov, D. S. & Shepelevich, I. S. Information entropy in chemistry: An overview. Entropy23(10), 1240 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dehmer, M. & Mowshowitz, A. A history of graph entropy measures. Info. Sci.181(1), 57–78 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Omar, Y. M. & Plapper, P. A survey of information entropy metrics for complex networks. Entropy22(12), 1417 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rashevsky, N. Life, information theory, and topology. Bull. Math. Biophys.17(3), 229–235 (1955). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mowshowitz, A. Entropy and the complexity of graphs: I. An index of the relative complexity of a graph. Bull. Math. Biophys.30(1), 175–204. (1968). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 32.Dehmer, M. Information processing in complex networks: Graph entropy and information functionals. Appl. Math. Comput.201(1–2), 82–94 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kazemi, R. Entropy of weighted graphs with the degree-based topological indices as weights. MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry76(1), 69–80 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jyothish, K. & Roy, S. Topological characterization of [n]-triangulenes through degree-based molecular descriptors with the prediction to -electron energy. Physica Scripta100(1), 015266 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gayathri, K. B. & Roy, S. Comparative QSPR study of food preservatives using topological indices and regression models. Sci. Rep.15(1), 24557 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gutman, I. & Trinajstić, N. Graph theory and molecular orbitals. In New concepts II 49–93 (Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2005).
  • 37.Gayathri, K. B., Santiago, R., & Govardhan, S. Hexagonal fractals: Topological indices, fractal dimensions, structure-property modeling and its applications. Curr. Org. Synth.22(7), 811–820 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 38.Jyothish, K. & Santiago, R. Quantitative structure–property relationship modeling with the prediction of physicochemical properties of some novel Duchenne muscular dystrophy drugs. ACS Omega10(4), 3640–3651 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.DS, A., Julietraja, K., Jaganathan, B. & Alsinai, A. Curcumin-conjugated PAMAM dendrimers of two generations: comparative analysis of physiochemical properties using Adriatic topological indices. ACS Omega9(12), 14558–14579 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 40.Julietraja, K. & Venugopal, P. Computation of degree-based topological descriptors using M-polynomial for coronoid systems. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd.42(4), 1770–1793 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhou, B. & Trinajstić, N. On a novel connectivity index. J. Math. Chem.46, 1252–1270 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ali, A., Raza, Z. & Bhatti, A. A. On the augmented Zagreb index. arXiv preprint arXiv:1402.3078. (2014).
  • 43.Gutman, I., Furtula, B. & Elphick, C. Three new/old vertex-degree-based topological indices. MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry. (2014).
  • 44.Furtula, B. & Gutman, I. A forgotten topological index. J. Math. Chem.53(4), 1184–1190 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhong, L. The harmonic index for graphs. Appl. Math. Lett.25(3), 561–566 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Furtula, B., Gutman, I. & Ediz, S. On difference of Zagreb indices. Discrete Appl. Math.178, 83–88 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Shirdel, G. H., Rezapour, H. & Sayadi, A. M. The hyper-Zagreb index of graph operations. Appl. Math.4(2), 47–56 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Manzoor, S., Siddiqui, M. K. & Ahmad, S. On entropy measures of molecular graphs using topological indices. Arab. J. Chem.13(8), 6285–6298 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chu, Y. M., Julietraja, K., Venugopal, P., Siddiqui, M. K. & Prabhu, S. Degree- and irregularity-based molecular descriptors for benzenoid systems. Eur. Phys. J. Plus136(1), 1–17 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Julietraja, K., Venugopal, P., Prabhu, S., Arulmozhi, A. K. & Siddiqui, M. K. Structural analysis of three types of PAHs using entropy measures. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd.42(7), 4101–4131 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shanmukha, M. C., Gowtham, K. J., Usha, A. & Julietraja, K. Expected values of Sombor indices and their entropy measures for graphene. Mol. Phys.122(10), e2276905 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Xu, S. A. & Liu, J. B. Entropies and degree-based topological indices of coronene fractal structures. Fractal Fract.9(3), 133 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yang, J., Konsalraj, J. & Raja, S. A. A. Neighbourhood sum degree-based indices and entropy measures for certain family of graphene molecules. Molecules28(1), 168 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Alam, M. A. et al. Degree-based entropy for a non-Kekulean benzenoid graph. J. Math.2022(1), 2288207 (2022). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES