Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2026 Jun 15;60(25):17600–17614. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c18003

Reagent-Free Prediction of Free-Ammonia Toxicity in Algal Systems Using Chlorophyll Fluorescence Transients and Interpretable Sparse Regression

Masatoshi Kishi †,‡,§,*, Panagiota Karachaliou ∥, Tetsuichi Fujiki §, Maki Noguchi Aita §, Raúl Muñoz †,‡,*
PMCID: PMC13325865  PMID: 42296291

Abstract

Accurate assessment of free ammonia (NH3) is critical for managing nutrient-rich effluents and algal-based treatment systems, but conventional assays are reagent-intensive and poorly suited to real-time monitoring. Chlorophyll a fluorescence offers a rapid, reagent-free proxy for photosynthetic health, yet widely used indices such as F v/F m respond nonspecifically to diverse stresses and rarely yield quantitative NH3 concentrations. Here, we develop a reagent-free framework that predicts NH3 toxicity in microalgae from fast chlorophyll fluorescence transients (O–J–I–P; OJIP) analyzed with interpretable sparse regression. Three species (Chlorella vulgaris, Acutodesmus obliquus, and Arthrospira platensis) were exposed to environmentally relevant NH3 levels, and OJIP responses were monitored for 35 h. Among several multivariate approaches, Lasso regression optimized by nested cross-validation provided the best compromise between accuracy (R 2 = 0.93–0.98 within species) and transferability across taxa (R 2 = 0.81–0.87 for green algae). The selected OJIP parameters captured conserved fluorescence signatures of NH3-induced stress and retained predictive power under light-induced photoinhibition that markedly depressed F v/F m. Incorporating model evaluation diagnostics enabled transparent uncertainty quantification and discrimination of extrapolative predictions. This workflow converts routine OJIP measurements into real-time, reagent-free, and quantitative information on ammonia toxicity in algal cultures and high-ammonia effluents, providing a transparent biosensing platform for environmental risk assessment.

Keywords: biosensor, chlorophyll fluorescence, environmental risk monitoring, free ammonia, microalgae, sparse Lasso regression, wastewater


graphic file with name es5c18003_0010.jpg


graphic file with name es5c18003_0008.jpg

1. Introduction

Ammonia (NH3/NH4 +) is a major nitrogen species of global environmental concern. Excessive ammonia contributes to eutrophication, oxygen depletion, and toxicity in aquatic ecosystems. Anthropogenic ammonia emissions have increased sharply over recent decades, driven mainly by fertilizer application and livestock production. For example, Liu et al. reported that agricultural ammonia emissions increased by 78% between 1980 and 2018. Beaudor et al. also noted that ∼85% of global anthropogenic ammonia emissions originate from agriculture, particularly fertilizer use and manure management. Together, these trends emphasize the growing ecological and toxicological importance of ammonia pollution.

In industrial and livestock wastewaters, ammonia often occurs at particularly high levels. Thus, total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN; the sum of NH3 and NH4 +) frequently exceeds 200 mg-N L–1 (>14 mM) in anaerobic digestion effluents, and in high-strength digestates from livestock or food waste, concentrations can reach several grams per liter. For instance, in food-waste anaerobic digestate, NH4 +-N concentrations of up to 2.6 g L–1 (>180 mM) have been reported, while another study documented TAN levels reaching 3.1 g-N L–1 (>220 mM) under mesophilic conditions. Although TAN comprises both ammonium (NH4 +) and free ammonia (NH3), toxicity arises mainly from the unionized free form, which readily diffuses across membranes and disrupts proton gradients. The fraction of TAN present as NH3 increases with pH, so that in alkaline digestates, free ammonia may accumulate to concentrations exceeding the tolerance thresholds of aquatic organisms and microalgae.

Such high NH3 concentration poses a major challenge to algae-based systems , and also represents a key hazard for aquatic environments, because most phytoplankton species exhibit limited tolerance to NH3 toxicity. For phototrophic organisms, free ammonia tolerance thresholds are relatively low: IC50 values of 27–44 mg-NH3 L–1 (22–36 mg-N L–1; 1.6–2.6 mM) have been reported for several algal and cyanobacterial species. Indeed, when cultivating microalgae on anaerobic digestate, a 5- to 10-fold dilution is commonly required to mitigate ammonia toxicity. , Such overlaps between environmental ammonia concentrations and biological sensitivity highlight the need for improved monitoring of ammonia toxicity in algal cultivation and wastewater treatment systems.

Conventional free ammonia assayssuch as colorimetric methods, ion-selective electrodes, and spectrophotometryare well established but have drawbacks: they require reagents, frequent calibrations, and costly instruments, and they are poorly suited to real-time monitoring in dynamic environments. These limitations have stimulated interest in reagent-free, rapid, and nondestructive sensing approaches capable of directly reflecting biological stress.

Chlorophyll a fluorescence provides a noninvasive optical tool for assessing photosynthetic stress, offering a sensitive and reagent-free method for monitoring environmental toxicity. The O–J–I–P (OJIP) transient is the fast chlorophyll a fluorescence induction curve from O (F 0) to P (F m), with intermediate steps such as J (∼2 ms) and I (∼30 ms), sensitively reflecting sequential redox reactions in photosystem II (PSII), capturing changes in electron transport, charge separation, and energy dissipation. These OJIP phases have been extensively studied as diagnostic indicators of PSII integrity under environmental stress, including exposure to metals, excess light, temperature shifts, and nutrient limitation. − Building on this mechanistic basis, fluorescence-based responses have also been utilized in practical biosensing systems. For example, a paper-based algal biosensor employing immobilized Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has successfully detected nanomolar-level herbicide via fluorescence, demonstrating the feasibility of translating PSII photochemical signals into toxicity detection. Most existing biosensors and modeling studies, however, rely on global yield metrics such as F v/F m or on a small number of composite JIP-test indices (e.g., PIabs, CPI, PIcte) that combine multiple partial processes into single scalars. While these indices are highly sensitive, they remain nonspecific: they respond similarly to chemically and physically distinct stressors and largely obscure which functional sites within PSII are perturbed.

Recent work has begun to exploit the richer information in OJIP fingerprints using multivariate statistics and machine-learning approaches, − but most existing studies still focus on qualitative toxicity discrimination or compress the transient into a few composite indices, thereby reducing mechanistic resolution. This limitation is particularly important for free ammonia, whose toxicity is thought to involve more than one photosynthetic process rather than a single inhibition site. Because such multiphasic perturbation is expected to affect different regions of the OJIP transient, , multivariable analysis of OJIP-resolved descriptors may provide better discriminability than single global indices alone. However, a quantitative framework that converts this richer fluorescence information into operationally useful estimates of the NH3 concentration is still lacking. This study addresses that need by developing and validating predictive models that link OJIP-derived fluorescence parameters to free ammonia concentrations in algal monocultures. Specifically, we aim to (i) construct sparse regression models that directly output NH3 concentrations (mM) from OJIP parameters under relevant exposure scenarios for bioprocess monitoring in algal cultivation and treatment systems where the dominant phototroph is known, (ii) evaluate the extent to which such models transfer across selected phototrophic taxa and dynamic exposure histories, including conditions of light-induced photoinhibition that strongly affect F v/F m, and (iii) incorporate applicability domain (AD) and prediction interval (PI) diagnostics to quantify predictive uncertainty and delineate trustworthy predictions. In this context, the cyanobacterium Arthrospira was included not to imply direct mechanistic equivalence with green algae but to test whether the overall fluorescence-to-NH3 framework retains predictive utility in an engineering-relevant cyanobacterial system. By jointly analyzing descriptors from different regions of the OJIP transient with sparse regression to select those most associated with specific functional sites, the proposed framework seeks to move chlorophyll-fluorescence-based biosensing beyond nonspecific composite indices toward a practical tool for reagent-free, real-time assessment of ammonia toxicity in algal and wastewater systems.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Test Organisms and Culture Conditions

Three phytoplankton species that frequently appear in wastewater treatment or algal cultivation were selected: two green algae Chlorella vulgaris Beijerinck SAG 211–11b and Acutodesmus obliquus (Turpin) Hegewald et Hanagata SAG 276–3a, and the cyanobacterium Arthrospira platensis (Nordstedt) Gomont SAG 21.99. Hereafter, each species is termed Chlorella, Acutodesmus, and Arthrospira, respectively. Arthrospira was included because cyanobacteria are relevant in ammonia-rich phototrophic treatment systems. , Its inclusion was meant to test whether the proposed fluorescence-based NH3 prediction framework retains its predictive value in a cyanobacterial system. However, cyanobacterial OJIP transients are not assumed to be mechanistically equivalent to those of green algae, , and cross-taxon comparisons were interpreted cautiously.

Green algae were cultured in Bold’s Basal Medium with 3-fold nitrogen (3N-BBM) supplemented with sodium bicarbonate and Tris-HCl. For the NH3 tolerance test, Mg2+ was reduced to 10% of the standard recipe to prevent precipitation; this modification did not affect growth over the experimental period. The alkaliphilic cyanobacterium Arthrospira was grown in modified Spirulina-Ogawa-Terui (SOT) medium. Precultures were maintained in aerated Roux glass flasks at 25 °C under continuous illumination (100 μmol photons m–2 s–1) and continuous media supply with temperature control in a thermostat water bath (CC1 Compatible Control, Huber, Germany). Continuous illumination was used to maintain a stable photoacclimated physiological state and to avoid diel fluctuations in chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics. The dilution rate was maintained at 0.4–0.6 d–1 until inoculation.

2.2. Controlled Exposure Experiments (Culture 1)

The 50% effective concentration (EC50) to NH3 was assumed from preliminary experiments as 1.3, 1.9, and 1.6 mM for Chlorella, Acutodesmus, and Arthrospira, respectively. Exposure levels were set at 0%, 50%, 100%, 200%, and 400% of each species’ EC50 (denoted N0–N400) to span subinhibitory to strongly inhibitory conditions. Cells were transferred to NH3-free media and equally distributed into 150 mL glass serum bottles (120 mL culture volume, triplicates) so that the initial optical density at 750 nm (OD750) becomes approximately 0.05. After 10 min of dark acclimation, NH4Cl was added to achieve the desired NH3 concentration, calculated from total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN), pH, temperature, and ionic strength (cf. Section ), and fluorescence was measured immediately thereafter. The measurement sequence was arranged so that all bottles experienced approximately the same dark-acclimation period before analysis, thereby standardizing the initial photosynthetic state across treatments. Bottles were incubated in a thermostat bath at 25 °C, under 100 μmol photons m–2 s–1 from white LEDs with stirring (300 rpm for Chlorella and Acutodesmus, 100 rpm for Arthrospira). Stirring was applied to maintain homogeneous suspensions, reduce settling and self-shading, and ensure consistent optical conditions during fluorescence measurement. Because agitation speed was kept constant within each species across all NH3 treatments, any mechanical effect would have acted as a shared background condition rather than as a treatment-specific factor. Liquid samples were taken at 0, 6–7, 12–13, 23, and 35–36 h after 10–15 min dark acclimation, and fluorescence, OD750, pH, and TAN were measured. Dynamic NH3 concentration was calculated for each sampling time. The inhibitory effect of Cl– from NH4Cl was considered negligible, as the maximum concentration of Cl– was approximately 70 mM, at which Chlorella vulgaris and Acutodesmus obliquus, as well as Arthrospira platensis, grew slightly more favorably than at lower concentrations.

2.3. External Validation Assays (Culture 2)

To test the external validity of the NH3 estimation models, short-duration validation cultures (Culture 2) were performed with higher initial cell density (initial OD750 of 0.4 as opposed to 0.05 in Culture 1) and shorter cultivation time (14 h). The NH3 concentration levels were further raised (0%, 50%, 150%, 350%, and 650%) for Acutodesmus and Arthrospira so that the validation data set contains sufficiently strong NH3 perturbations. Experimental conditions were otherwise similar to those of Culture 1. These validation data sets were obtained from independent laboratory cultures under controlled conditions and did not involve real wastewater matrices. These data sets were not used in model training and served exclusively for external evaluation.

2.4. Analytical and Fluorescence Measurement Protocols

Chlorophyll fluorescence was measured with a portable fluorometer (AquaPen CP-110, PSI, Czechia). Three protocols were applied: maximum quantum yield (F v/F m) after dark acclimation, fast fluorescence induction (OJIP) curves recorded for 2 s, and a light curve protocol (LC2) consisting of four actinic light levels from 50 to 1000 μmol photons m–2 s–1 with 30 s intervals. Blue excitation light at 455 nm was used for the two green algae, while red–orange excitation at 630 nm was applied for the cyanobacterium. The longer excitation wavelength was selected for Arthrospira because cyanobacterial fluorescence is strongly influenced by phycobilisome-based light harvesting, , and preliminary measurements showed that blue excitation did not produce a sufficiently stable induction signal for this species. Consequently, comparisons involving Arthrospira were based on normalized and derived OJIP descriptors rather than on absolute fluorescence amplitudes. The saturation pulse intensity was approximately 600 μmol photons m–2 s–1 as measured using a spherical quantum sensor (US-SQS/L, Walz, Germany) connected to a light meter (LI-250A, LI-COR, USA). In addition, pH (Accumet AB315, Fisher Scientific, USA), optical density at 750 nm (OD750) (UV-2550, Shimadzu, Japan), and total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN, Nessler method) were measured for each sample.

2.5. Derived Variables and Fluorescence Data Preprocessing

2.5.1. Growth Rate, NH3, and EC50 Calculations

The specific growth rates (μ; d–1) of each microalga were calculated with growth data after the lag phase (>6 h). For Acutodesmus and Arthrospira, since the reduction in growth was observed in 23–35 h, the growth data up to 23 h were used. The growth rate was calculated using eq :

μ=ln⁡X2−ln⁡X1t2−t1 1

where X i is the OD750 at time t i (d).

Free ammonia was calculated from total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN) concentration, pH, temperature, and ionic strength. The pK a value was calculated based on ionic strength and temperature as follows: −

pKa=2835.76T−0.6322+0.001225×T+(0.1552−0.0003142(T−273.15))If 2

where T is the temperature in kelvin (K), I f is the ionic strength (mol L–1), which was calculated from the medium composition and NH4Cl added. The NH3 concentration was calculated as follows:

[NH3]=Ka×[TAN]10−pH+Ka 3

The NH3 concentration was not assumed to remain constant after NH4Cl addition. Instead, it was recalculated for each sampling time point using the measured TAN and pH values together with the temperature and ionic strength. This time-resolved NH3 value was then used as the response variable for the model construction and evaluation.

The 50% effective concentration (EC50) was estimated by fitting a two-parameter Hill equation according to eq :

μrel=11+(xEC50)n 4

where μrel is the relative specific growth rate normalized to the maximum value in the N0 culture, x is the NH3 concentration (mM), and n is the Hill coefficient.

2.5.2. OJIP Preprocessing and Quality Assurance

OJIP transients represent fast chlorophyll a fluorescence induction curves recorded after illumination of dark-adapted photosynthetic samples. The fluorescence intensity rises from the origin (O) to the maximum (P) through distinct inflection pointsK (≈300 μs), J (≈2–3 ms), and I (≈30 ms)that correspond to sequential reductions of electron carriers within photosystem II (PSII), including the oxygen-evolving complex (OEC), the primary quinone acceptor QA, and the plastoquinone (PQ) pool. These characteristic phases provide diagnostic information on the redox dynamics and functionality of the photosynthetic electron transport chain. ,−

Raw OJIP traces were first resampled onto a logarithmic sequence of time points, regularly spaced along a log-transformed time axis. The resampled curves were then smoothed using a cubic smoothing spline (scipy.interpolate.UnivariateSpline), with smoothing factors adjusted to preserve the O–K–J–I–P kinetics while reducing high-frequency noise. Smoothed traces were subsequently normalized at O (minimum fluorescence; F 0) and P (maximum fluorescence; F m), and fluorescence parameters were calculated (Table ; see Supporting Information Table S1 for the full list of the parameters). Instead of utilizing the full set of JIP-test parameters, the parameter set was preselected based on whether the variables (i) directly described OJIP-shape changes (e.g., relative fluorescence values such as V j) or (ii) represented physiologically interpretable descriptors of electron-transport behavior that were potentially relevant to NH3 stress. Parameter-ablation analysis showed that removing many JIP-test-derived parameters had only minor effects on prediction accuracy, whereas excluding the area-related descriptors (S m and N) reduced performance more clearly (see Supporting Information Section 1b). After parameter calculation, quality assurance was applied by excluding measurements with abnormal curve shapes, unstable baselines, or insufficient signal-to-noise ratios (see Supporting Information for detailed criteria). In highly inhibited cells during the latter culture period, fluorescence signals were markedly reduced, resulting in a low signal-to-noise ratio (cf. Supporting Information Figure S1). Thus, the quality assurance resulted in the exclusion of most N400 samples (except Time 0 in all species) and most N200 samples in Arthrospira. The results on most fluorescence parameters (except for F v/F m) presented in this paper are based on the selected samples.

1. Principal OJIP-Derived Parameters Discussed in This Work .
Parameter Definition Formula Physiological significance
F 0 Minimal fluorescence F 0 All PSII RCs open
F m Maximal fluorescence F m All PSII RCs closed
F v/F m Maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry
FvFm=Fm−F0Fm
PSII efficiency
F p/F max Ratio of P amplitude to max signal
FpFmax
Relative elevation of the J region against the terminal fluorescence peak
V k Relative variable fluorescence at 300 μs
F300μs−F0Fm−F0
Early PSII perturbation during the O–J
V j Relative variable fluorescence at J step (2 ms)
Fj−F0Fm−F0
J-step accumulation (QA-related)
V i Relative variable fluorescence at I step (30 ms)
Fi−F0Fm−F0
Later acceptor-side reduction state (PQ-pool-related)
V k/V j Ratio of K to J step
F300μs−F0Fj−F0
Early donor-side-associated perturbation relative to the J step
M 0 Approximated initial slope of fluorescence rise
4(F300μs−F0)Fm−F0
Initial rate of fluorescence rise (early PSII closure dynamics)
Area Integrated area above the fluorescence curve up to tFm
∫t0tFm(Fm−F(t))dt
Integrated acceptor-side capacity beyond QA
S m Normalized area above the fluorescence curve
AreaFm−F0
Size of electron-acceptor pool
N Number of QA reduction events until F m
Sm×M0Vj
Multiturnover electron-acceptor capacity up to F m
a

Only the parameters most critical for interpreting photosynthetic responses are summarized here. A full compilation of parameters is provided in the Supplementary Materials. Parameters are mostly derived from Strasser et al., 2004.

b

Custom parameter. Abbreviations: PSII = photosystem II; RC = reaction center; QA = primary quinone electron acceptor of PSII; PQ = plastoquinone pool (secondary electron acceptor beyond QA); and OEC = oxygen-evolving complex.

For LC2 measurements, representative indices including ΦII (effective quantum yield of PSII photochemistry), NPQ (nonphotochemical quenching coefficient, reflecting heat dissipation capacity), and qP (photochemical quenching coefficient, representing the proportion of open PSII centers) were obtained at each actinic light intensity within 50–1000 μmol photons m–2 s–1. These indices were used only for comparison with OJIP-derived models.

2.6. Model Construction and Statistical Analysis

Growth and fluorescence responses across treatments were compared by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer post hoc tests.

2.6.1. Multivariable Modeling of NH3 Prediction

Recent advances in machine learning have increasingly enabled the quantitative estimation of environmental indicators from complex sensor signals. Chlorophyll a fluorescence is particularly well suited yet underexploited to such data-driven approaches because OJIP transients provide high-dimensional yet mechanistically interpretable fingerprints of photosynthetic status. In this study, we therefore applied multivariable modeling to predict free ammonia (NH3) concentrations from chlorophyll fluorescence–derived parameters (hereafter referred to as features in the context of model construction). Three families of multivariable analyses were deployed: Canonical Analysis of Principal Coordinates (CAP), regularized linear regressions (Ridge and Lasso), and tree-based ensemble regressors (Random Forests and Gradient Boosting). The former two model families were first attempted to distinguish the five levels of NH3 categorically (N0 to N400) through discrimination analyses. Then, regression analyses were attempted to predict the actual NH3 concentrations in the algal cultures. The models constructed with data from Chlorella were used for the comparison, as this data set was more robust and represented both light inhibition and recovery more than the other species.

Canonical Analysis of Principal Coordinates (CAP) was included to ensure continuity with fluorescence-based discrimination studies (Duarte et al., 2021). Ridge and Lasso (names derived from “Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator”) regressions are regularized multiple regression methods that incorporate penalty terms to avoid overfitting and to address the effect of collinearity among variables. , While Ridge regression retains all variables with shrunk coefficients, Lasso regression performs variable selection by reducing some coefficients to zero, making it a powerful tool to construct compact and versatile predictive models, which are frequently applied in machine learning. , Although intermediate approaches such as the Elastic Net combine both L1 and L2 penalties, this study focused on comparing Ridge and Lasso as representative extremes of regularization. Tree-based ensemble regressors, including Random Forest and Gradient Boosting, were additionally tested as nonlinear counterparts to the regularized linear models. Random forest constructs an ensemble of decision trees trained on bootstrapped subsets of data and averages their predictions to reduce variance and enhance generalization. Gradient boosting sequentially builds weak learners that iteratively minimize residual errors through gradient descent in function space, enabling flexible modeling of complex nonlinear relationships.

For the CAP analysis, canonical discrimination analysis (CDA) and canonical correlation analysis (CCorA) were employed for categorical and regression analyses, respectively, using the PRIMER-e software. The categorization analysis of Ridge and Lasso was conducted after the regression analysis with the Python library Scikit-learn (sklearn.discriminant_analysis.LinearDiscriminantAnalysis).

To compare five modeling approaches (CCorA, Ridge, Lasso, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting), preprocessed OJIP-derived features from Chlorella cultures were used as explanatory variables, and the measured NH3 concentration (mM) was used as the response variable. Model hyperparameters were optimized by grouped nested cross-validation (CV) (see Supporting Information Section 6). The resulting optimized models were first evaluated within the Chlorella data set and were subsequently applied to Acutodesmus and Arthrospira data sets to examine cross-species transferability. Model performance was compared using R 2, Pearson’s r, and RMSE.

In this study, Lasso regression was employed as the primary predictive model owing to its ability to perform variable selection and maintain robustness across phytoplankton species and cultures. Lasso is one of the most widely used forms of sparse regression, in which variable selection is achieved by shrinking many coefficients to zero. Model optimization was conducted by using grouped nested CV with repetition. − In Lasso analysis, the training objective is defined according to eq :

L(α)=(1/(2n))×∥y−X×w∥2+α×∥w∥1 5

where L is the objective function (squared error plus L1 penalty); X is the fluorescent feature matrix (n × p); y is the target vector (n × 1); w is the coefficient vector (p × 1); n is the number of training samples; α is the L1 penalty strength (often written as λ in other conventions, with λ = 2n · α under an alternative scaling); the coefficients were estimated by minimizing L(α) with respect to w at each α. The α chosen in the inner CV loop was then fixed when refitting on each outer-training split and used to predict the corresponding outer-validation fold.

To qualify prediction reliability, we applied two diagnostics: the applicability domain (AD), which delineates the region of fluorescence-feature space represented by the training data, and the prediction interval (PI), which reports the expected uncertainty for each individual estimate. Samples outside the AD were flagged as extrapolations; wide PIs indicated high uncertainty even within the domain. Implementation details (distance-based AD; PI calibration) are provided in the Supporting Information. For external validation, AD thresholds and PI limits were calibrated exclusively from the corresponding training data and then applied unchanged to validation samples; no validation-set recalibration or threshold adjustment was performed. Regression accuracy with true observed values was also evaluated by performance metrics including the coefficient of determination (R 2), root-mean-square error (RMSE), and Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). Metrics were computed for out-of-fold predictions and, where applicable, external validation. RMSE is reported in mM NH3. Details are described in Supporting Information.

In addition to Lasso, Ridge regression and two tree-based ensemble regressors were trained as comparative models. All models were implemented in Python using the scikit-learn library and optimized under the identical grouped nested CV protocol used for Lasso with hyperparameters tuned in the inner folds.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physiological and Growth Responses to Ammonia Exposure

The growth of all three microalgae was inhibited from low ammonia concentration (N50), and the growth ceased at high ammonia concentrations (N200 and N400) in all cultures (Figure A), confirming the acute physiological toxicity of free ammonia. The maximum specific growth rates obtained in assays without ammonia (N0) were 1.47 ± 0.03, 1.71 ± 0.02, and 0.93 ± 0.06 d–1 for Chlorella, Acutodesmus, and Arthrospira, respectively. The growth rates of Chlorella and Acutodesmus were comparable to literature values, suggesting that there was no other strong toxicity other than ammonia in the culture. On the other hand, that of Arthrospira showed slightly lower values than those reported in the literature, which suggests partial metabolic damage. The relatively lower growth rate of Arthrospira could be due to physical stress from agitation, as a lower growth rate was observed at higher rotation speeds. This potential confound was constant within species across NH3 treatments, but it may have increased the baseline physiological sensitivity of Arthrospira and is therefore acknowledged as a limitation.

1.

1

Growth curve and photosynthetic activity of the three species. (A) Growth and (B) maximum quantum yield of PSII (F v/F m) over the culture period. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicate cultures.

The EC50 obtained in these culture tests were 1.18, 2.07, and 0.61 mM NH3 for Chlorella, Acutodesmus, and Arthrospira, respectively (Figure ). These values were lower than the literature values of similar species: Chlorella 1.6–3.57 mM; Acutodesmus (Scenedesmus) 3.08 mM; and Arthrospira (Limnospira and/or Spirulina) 2.6–4.9 mM. ,,, These lower EC50 values could be due to the very diluted culture (initial OD750 of 0.05) with moderate light intensity (100 μmol m–2 s–1), since light intensity is known to increase the level of toxicity of NH3 to algae. The combined damage by agitation may have further induced vulnerability in Arthrospira.

2.

2

(A-C) Ammonia toxicity characteristics of the three species. The relative specific growth rate was calculated by taking the highest value as the denominator. Negative values were clipped to 0. The 50% effective concentration (EC50) values were calculated by fitting a two-parameter Hill equation.

The maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) was estimated with a fluorescent parameter F v/F m (Figure B), which generally shows a good correlation with microalgal and cyanobacterial growth. The initial F v/F m values of the control cultures of Chlorella and Acutodesmus were slightly lower than the typical range reported for healthy green microalgae (around 0.7 or higher), likely due to mild stress associated with the transfer from dense precultures to dilute experimental cultures. For Arthrospira, F v/F m should be regarded as an apparent rather than absolute maximum PSII quantum yield, because dark acclimation alone may not fully oxidize the shared photosynthetic and respiratory electron carriers in cyanobacteria. Chemical inhibitors such as DCMU can be used in some contexts to approach full QA reduction and PSII reaction center closure, but they were intentionally avoided here to preserve the reagent-free objective of the study. Interestingly, the values of F v/F m quickly responded to the NH3 exposure at least in the order of seconds to minutes, as Time 0 samples exhibited good correlations with the NH3 concentrations (Figure B), even though they were measured only a few tens of seconds after the introduction of ammonia. This rapid response suggests that chlorophyll fluorescence is a good candidate tool to monitor NH3 toxicity in an algal suspension, as suggested with other toxins (Choi et al., 2012).

However, reductions in the F v/F m values, even in the control assay, were observed at time 7 h, as compared to those at Time 0. This reduction was probably due to the transition from dense precultures (OD750 range of 1–3) to dilute cultures (OD750 = 0.05), resulting in photoinhibition at the first hours of incubation. The F v/F m recovered thereafter in Chlorella and Acutodesmus most likely owing to the acclimation to the light intensity, while it remained low in Arthrospira, probably because of continued stress from light and agitation. In this context, the reduction in F v/F m due to light inhibition is a clear example of the challenges in assessing NH3 inhibition during the monitoring of algal suspensions. Because the F v/F m parameter is sensitive to a wide range of stressors affecting photosynthetic systems, relying solely on it may result in inaccurate estimations of NH3 inhibition (see Supporting Information Section 4 for the correlation). This emphasizes the need to explore photosynthetic parameters that can specifically detect the NH3 toxicity.

3.2. Fluorescence Responses and Diagnostic Indicators of NH3 Toxicity

3.2.1. Fast Fluorescence Induction (OJIP) Curve

There were several visible characteristics of NH3-inhibited cells in the OJIP curves. In the raw OJIP curve, an increase in F 0 (O step; minimal fluorescence, when PSII reaction centers are functionally open) was recorded in all three cultures (Figure A). Such an increase in F 0 is not unique to NH3 and has also been reported under other abiotic stressors (e.g., heat, salinity, and high light). ,, Previous research conservatively attributed the increase of F 0 to early PSII perturbation, potentially involving donor-side limitation including the oxygen evolving complex (OEC). , It has been proposed that NH3 can perturb photosynthesis through more than one process, including effects associated with PSII donor-side function including the OEC and proton-coupled energy conversion. ,, In the present study, the rise in F 0 is interpreted as evidence of early PSII perturbation, potentially involving donor-side limitation, rather than as a direct marker of any single inhibition site.

3.

3

OJIP curves of the three species at Time 0. (A) Raw OJIP curves; note that Arthrospira was measured with a different wavelength, inducing higher intensity. (B) Double-normalized OJIP curves at F m and F 0. (C) Double-normalized curve between O and J, showing the K-band at the middle. Shaded colored envelopes show the standard deviation of triplicates.

Despite the clear effect of NH3 on F 0 increase, such a change in raw fluorescence values cannot be used for the detection of NH3 toxicity directly, as absolute fluorescence intensities highly vary with biomass density and excitation light intensity. Therefore, normalized values should be employed to explore the useful parameters. While F 0/F m is a convenient normalized index to capture the F 0 increase, it is also strongly influenced by the reduction of F m. To utilize the rise of F 0 as an indicator, more precise normalization, such as on a chlorophyll content basis, would be required, but this is difficult to achieve during field sampling. Thus, alternative normalized parameters must be sought out.

Normalized parameters can be sought out in the OJIP curve double-normalized at F m (P peak) and F 0 (O). Here, an increase in the K step and a reduction in the I step were observed in NH3-inhibited cultures (Figure B). The increase of the K step, which is more easily visible in the relative O–J curves (Figure C), has been frequently associated with donor-side perturbation, including impairment of electron donation from the OEC. , The steeper early O–J rise, reflected by parameters such as M 0 and V k/V j, is interpreted here as an accelerated closure of PSII centers and an altered donor/acceptor-side balance. In parallel, the reduced I step suggests that the balance between PQ-pool reduction by PSII and its reoxidation shifted toward the latter, thereby limiting the accumulation of reduced PQ states during the J–I phase.

Taken together, these three responseshigher F 0, enhanced K step, and suppressed J–I riseindicate that NH3 primarily impaired PSII function, likely through a combination of donor-side perturbation and altered QA/PQ redox dynamics. This interpretation is consistent with previous studies showing that ammonia can promote PSII photodamage, including effects linked to the OEC, and can also disturb ΔpH-dependent coupling processes.

However, a single parameter such as V k/V j or F v/F m is not stable enough to be used for predicting NH3 toxicity, as these parameters can also shift with other factors, such as light intensity (e.g., Figure B and Figure S4). Instead, a combination of several parameters to extract the NH3-specific changes through multivariable analyses can be an alternative method. Since the OJIP curve can represent changes in different parts of the photosynthetic pathway, NH3-specific information may be extracted from various parameters.

3.3. Multivariable Modeling of NH3 Toxicity

The aim of this section is to establish a minimal yet transferable method to estimate free ammonia (NH3) concentrations from chlorophyll fluorescence transients (the OJIP curve). Three multivariable analyses were compared and evaluated to elucidate whether multivariable models based on the OJIP fluorescence rise can provide robust predictions across related algal taxa and under different culture conditions. In addition to accuracy, we attempted to clarify operational boundaries, with which the created models can be objectively judged as to whether they can be applied to a new observation.

3.3.1. Comparison of Multivariable and Sparse Regression Models

Canonical Analysis of Principal Coordinates (CAP), when implemented as canonical discriminant analysis (CDA), can categorize samples by types of toxicity, as has been demonstrated in ecological applications. , The categorization by CAP was superior in interspecies categorization by Ridge and Lasso (Table ), most likely because it utilizes multidimensional space for categorization.

2. Overall Classification Accuracy of NH3 Levels through Discrimination Analysis with Models Trained on Chlorella Samples.
Models Chlorella Acutodesmus Arthrospira
CAP (CDA) 81.0% 82.5% 28.6%
Ridge 93.7% 58.7% 0%
Lasso 87.3% 69.8% 5.3%
a

Because the model was trained and validated on the same Chlorella data set, the reported accuracy represents an internal reference rather than an independent validation.

b

CDA: canonical discrimination analysis.

However, categorization is not the best approach to assess the intensity of NH3 toxicity as it cannot distinguish levels of toxicity. In regard to the linear regression approach, canonical correlation analysis (CCorA) seemed to have lost its advantage of multidimensional space, and superior results were observed with Lasso analysis in interspecies prediction (Table ). Both CCorA and Ridge regression provided high apparent accuracy within species but performed poorly when applied to unseen species, probably because of the retention of all variables, which hinders extrapolation across correlated feature blocks. Similarly, tree-based ensemble regressors (random forest and gradient boosting) achieved high apparent accuracy within species but showed limited transferability to unseen species, reflecting their weaker extrapolation capacity. In particular, while linear regressions (Ridge and Lasso) maintained strong correlations (r) for Arthrospira, the tree-based models showed markedly lower predictive strength, further indicating that linear sparse methods generalize better to new data. By contrast, Lasso regression yielded an accuracy comparable to Ridge regression within species while achieving superior generalization across species. Lasso accomplished this by reducing coefficients of less informative variables to zero, thereby emphasizing a smaller subset of physiologically interpretable predictors. As a form of sparse regression, Lasso preferentially retains core fluorescence features while discarding redundant ones, thereby enhancing cross-species generalization. On the basis of these comparisons, Lasso regression was selected as the primary modeling approach in this study.

3. Metrics of Regression Analyses Using Models Trained on Chlorella .
  Chlorella
Acutodesmus
Arthrospira
Models R 2 r R 2 r R 2 r
CAP (CCorA) 0.78 0.88 0.62 0.87 0.014 0.20
Ridge 0.94 0.97 0.86 0.93 –91.6 0.96
Lasso 0.93 0.97 0.87 0.95 –107 0.95
Random forest 0.99 1.00 0.80 0.97 –7.43 0.48
Gradient boosting 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.92 –7.47 0.74
a

Because the model was trained and validated on the same Chlorella data set, the reported accuracy represents an internal reference rather than an independent validation.

b

CCorA: canonical correlation analysis.

3.3.2. Lasso Prediction Models: Model Training and Interspecies Versatility

Lasso regression models were trained with cross-validation to identify stable predictive features of the OJIP transient and evaluate transferability across species. Predictions were assessed both within species and across species, and results are presented as out-of-fold validation on the shaded diagonal panels of Figure A and as cross-species applications on the off-diagonal panels.

4.

4

Model training and interspecies validation of Lasso regression. (A) Cross-species nested cross-validation scatter matrix (teach × predict). Shaded diagonal blocks are self-species (e.g., Cv → Cv). Dashed lines are 1:1 line; dotted red lines are 97.5% prediction interval. Applicability-domain (AD) out-of-domain samples are shown in a solid black outline. (B) Variable selection frequency with median absolute coefficient (|w|) (blue circles).

Within-species validation demonstrated high prediction accuracy for all three taxa, with relatively narrow prediction intervals and stable feature selection across folds (Figure A, diagonal; Figure B), yielding R 2 = 0.93–0.98 and prediction intervals (PIs) of ±0.77–1.11 mM. This performance is notable given that F v/F m alone was influenced by early photoinhibition during culture acclimation, as indicated by the decrease observed even in the control cultures (Figure B; see Supporting Information Section 4). In other words, the model did not rely solely on the absolute level of F v/F m, but on the broader OJIP fingerprint. These results suggest that the multivariable approach was less sensitive to transient photoinhibition than single-parameter monitoring and therefore provided more robust NH3 prediction under the tested conditions.

Several core features (fluorescent parameters), notably the turnover number of QA reduction (N), were consistently selected across folds and species. Together with S m, N belongs to a group of descriptors that summarize the multiturnover capacity of the electron-acceptor side beyond QA before F m is reached. These variables do not identify a single primary site of NH3 action; rather, they provide integrated descriptors of electron-acceptor-side behavior, including the balance of electron flow through PSII and downstream acceptors such as the PQ pool. , Their repeated selection suggests that NH3 prediction depended not only on proximal PSII-related perturbation but also on broader changes in acceptor-side behavior. In this context, the combination of lower V i and higher N is consistent with a shift of the acceptor side toward a more oxidized state, possibly reflecting altered photosynthetic control and energetic coupling through reduced ΔpH, though this interpretation remains indirect and does not establish a single validated mechanism.

Cross-species transfer between the two green algae, Chlorella and Acutodesmus, was successful, but the transfer between Chlorella and Acutodesmus was asymmetric. The models trained on Chlorella generalized better to Acutodesmus (R 2 = 0.87) than the reverse (R 2 = 0.81). This asymmetry likely arises from broader variability and better feature space coverage in the Chlorella training data, which included both photoinhibition and recovery trajectories. This variability allowed the Lasso model to identify stable OJIP parameters, which enhanced the NH3 prediction under the influence of photoinhibition. Consistent with this interpretation, applying the Acutodesmus-trained model to Chlorella produced greater dispersion (Figure A, upper middle). Accordingly, the Chlorella -trained model is more inclusive and better suited to fluctuating samples because of the diversity in the training sample.

Models trained on Arthrospira did not transfer to green algae (Figure A, right), consistent with the selection of variables that were specific to the fluorescence characteristics of this cyanobacterium, including the custom ratio F p/F max. This parameter is interpreted here as a species-specific descriptor rather than a universal cyanobacterial marker. Its repeated selection in Arthrospira may reflect the fact that cyanobacterial fluorescence kinetics are shaped not only by PSII photochemistry but also by phycobilisome-associated excitation transfer, state transitions, and interactions between photosynthetic and respiratory electron transport. These processes can alter the relative prominence of the J region and the terminal peak in ways that are not directly comparable to those of the green algal curves. Conversely, models trained on green algae preserved a high correlation (r) between predicted and observed NH3 concentrations in Arthrospira (Figure A, left bottom), but the absolute errors remained large. This pattern suggests that some broad NH3-related stress signatures may be shared across phototrophic taxa, whereas the quantitative conversion of OJIP features into absolute NH3 concentrations is not directly transferable from green algae to cyanobacteria. Because cyanobacterial fluorescence kinetics are influenced by phycobilisome excitation transfer, state transitions, and coupling between photosynthetic and respiratory electron transport, cyanobacterial deployment should use separate calibration; species- or lineage-specific calibration may be required for taxa beyond Arthrospira. Overall, the results indicate that sparse regression enhances generalization by suppressing overfitting to the correlated blocks of variables.

3.3.3. External Validation and Uncertainty Quantification

To evaluate robustness under distribution shift, models on the NH3 toxicity tolerance test (Culture 1) were trained and applied to the independent validation culture (Culture 2), which differed in growth trajectories and NH3 dynamics. The models were evaluated based on whether each sample falls within the applicability domain (AD) and prediction interval (PI), as well as standard metrics (R 2 and RMSE).

Prediction performance remained high for Chlorella and Arthrospira, with R 2 values of 0.87 and RMSE of 0.55–0.84 mM (Figure A,C). These results demonstrate that the proposed sparse regression approach retains predictive validity under varying exposure conditions, a prerequisite for reliable application in hazard monitoring. The validation of Chlorella had low AD-out and PI-out ratios of 0% and 23%, despite the difference in the culture condition, indicating that the model was inclusive. On the other hand, that of Arthrospira showed low AD-out (0%) but high PI-out (38%), indicating a highly inclusive but less accurate model. This lower accuracy was induced by the small number of samples in the teaching data after quality assurance (n = 30). Notably, the model successfully captured time-dependent changes in NH3 concentration, demonstrating that chlorophyll fluorescence can dynamically track NH3 variation during algal cultivation. For example, in Chlorella at low nitrogen concentrations (N50), the actual observed NH3 concentrations rose from approximately 0.7 mM at inoculation to 1.8 mM after 14 h owing to the pH-driven shift in NH3/NH4 + equilibrium, and the predicted values paralleled this shift of NH3 (Figure A). Similarly, in Arthrospira, decreases in total ammoniacal nitrogen during the same interval were mirrored by declines in predicted NH3, approaching zero after 14 h (Figure C). These changes in the observed NH3 concentrations were well predicted by the model, further ensuring the ability of chlorophyll fluorescence to monitor the change of the culture. This capacity supports its potential for real-time monitoring in controlled phototrophic cultivation and treatment systems. Validation in real wastewater containing additional chemical and biological interferences remains future work.

5.

5

External validation on Culture 2. Predicted vs observed NH3 for (A) Chlorella (Cv), (B) Acutodesmus (Ao), and (C) Arthrospira (Ap); the dashed black line is 1:1 line, and the dotted red lines are 97.5% prediction interval. Applicability-domain (AD) out-of-domain samples are shown in a solid black outline. AD and PI limits were calibrated on Culture 1 training data and applied unchanged to Culture 2; no validation-set recalibration was performed.

By contrast, predictions for Acutodesmus showed larger errors and a higher fraction of samples outside the AD (Figure B). This pattern reflects both the relative homogeneity of Acutodesmus training data, which limited model flexibility, and the deviation of the fluorescence data in Culture 2, partially owing to the high NH3 levels. Nevertheless, the explicit reporting of AD and PI enabled a clear diagnosis of failure modes, distinguishing cases in which fluorescence signals fell outside the training distribution from cases in which uncertainty alone was large. These results demonstrate that chlorophyll fluorescence–based prediction of NH3 can remain reliable under substantial variation in culture conditions, as shown by two campaigns differing by more than 10-fold in cell density and exhibiting distinct NH3 ranges. While many Acutodesmus samples were AD-out, the AD/PI framework effectively prevented false confidence and retraining with the AD-out data improved generality. Because changes in cell density inherently modify the light environment within the culture, these findings indicate that the model is robust against moderate shifts in the light regime, cell density, and NH3 concentration, although broader training diversity will be required for robust deployment under more variable wastewater conditions.

There are several ways to improve the models, such as by incorporating other fluorescent protocols and increasing the number and variety of samples. In regard to other fluorescent protocols, incorporation of the data from the light curve protocol (LC2) was tested but resulted in only minor improvements in some cases (cf. Supporting Information Section 9). This result confirms that OJIP contains a variety of information on the photosystems, which is enough to predict NH3 toxicity from just a couple of seconds of measurement. By increasing the number and variety of teaching samples, models created by the OJIP can further become versatile.

To confirm whether the expansion of sample variety can lead to a more versatile model, an inclusive model that pooled all green algal data from both Culture 1 and Culture 2 was constructed. Internal validation of this combined data set demonstrated expanded applicability-domain coverage while maintaining reasonable prediction-interval widths (Figure A). When applied illustratively to Acutodesmus from Culture 2, the combined model retained all samples within both AD and PI boundaries (Figure B). Although this approach does not replace comprehensive external validation, it demonstrates that combining diverse training data with strict quality control can yield models suitable for the real-time monitoring of algal cultures and wastewater treatment systems.

6.

6

Demonstration of an inclusive model with combined training by Chlorella and Acutodesmus data from both Culture 1 and Culture 2. (A) Final Lasso model (α chosen via grouped nested cross-validation) predictions on all combined data (Pred vs Obs) colored by Culture-Species (Culture 1/2 × Chlorella/Acutodesmus); the black line is 1:1 line; the dashed red lines are ± 95% prediction interval (PI); applicability-domain (AD) out-of-domain samples are shown in a solid black outline. (B) The same combined model applied to Culture 2 Acutodesmus, showing PI coverage and AD-out fraction. For this pooled-data demonstration, AD and PI limits were calibrated from the combined green-algal training set and then held fixed for the displayed predictions.

3.3.4. Deployment Workflow: From Model Development to Operational Use

For practical deployment in algal systems and environmental hazard monitoring, a concise workflow linking data quality, standardized preprocessing, and explicit operational boundaries is proposed (Figure ). During model development, fluorescence data should be collected under a fixed measurement protocol to minimize the variability. Quality control removes samples with noise, truncation, or saturation, and features were scaled by using parameters from the training set. The Lasso regression model is then optimized by nested cross-validation, and residuals are used to calibrate the prediction intervals. The applicability domain is defined in the fluorescence feature space, yielding a fixed package of scaler, model, AD definition, and PI calibration.

7.

7

Suggested model development and deployment workflow for NH3 prediction using chlorophyll fluorescence. CV: cross-validation; AD: applicability domain; PI: prediction interval.

In deployment, this package is applied to new monitoring data by using the same steps. Measurements must follow identical standards since differences in excitation wavelength, saturation pulse, or detector settings can shift samples outside the applicability domain. Raw traces undergo the same quality checks, features are standardized, and each sample is screened against AD. Out-of-domain inputs are rejected, while in-domain predictions are provided with their PIs. Wide intervals flag high uncertainty and prompt confirmation before action.

As shown in Figure , this workflow clarifies failure modesmeasurement errors, domain extrapolation, or statistical uncertaintyand ensures transparent operation. Logging of AD and PI decisions supports drift monitoring and guides retraining when the operating space expands. When drift is detected, NH3 concentrations for representative AD-out samples are assayed and the resulting labeled data are appended to the training set, followed by controlled model retraining. This loop can be automated via periodic reference measurements and scheduled updates, closing the cycle between deployment and training. By enforcing standardized protocols and explicit boundaries, fluorescence-based NH3 prediction can serve as a reagent-free biosensing method for real-time hazard monitoring in algal and wastewater environments. This framework is consistent with best practices in predictive environmental modeling. − By following these principles, chlorophyll fluorescence–based NH3 prediction can be applied safely and reproducibly to real-time monitoring of algal cultivation and wastewater treatment systems.

3.4. Implications, Limitations, and Outlook for Environmental Hazard Assessment

From the perspective of environmental toxicology, this study provides a mechanistically interpretable and transferable approach to quantifying ammonia-induced stress through optical biosensing. The present study shows that OJIP fluorescence transients, when analyzed with sparse regression and explicit boundary diagnostics, can provide a practical method for estimating free-ammonia concentrations in phototrophic systems. This approach requires only seconds of nondestructive measurement, uses open-source computational tools, and avoids the need for chemical reagents or expensive proprietary equipment. Although single fluorescence indices such as F v/F m or V k/V j are not uniquely specific to NH3, the multivariate OJIP approach combines complementary information from different parts of the fluorescence transients. Early-phase descriptors such as M 0 and V k/V j captured proximal changes related to PSII donor-side perturbation, whereas later and integrated descriptors such as S m and N reflected broader changes in acceptor-side redox behavior and multiturnover electron transport. , These latter variables are not interpreted here as direct reporters of proton gradient disruption. Rather, they are discussed as integrated descriptors of downstream electron-acceptor behavior and energetic coupling, which may be influenced when NH3 perturbs photosynthesis at multiple levels. Under the controlled conditions tested here, this broader fluorescence fingerprint enabled NH3 prediction to be more effective than any single parameter alone. In a stress response that likely affects multiple parts of the photosynthetic system, the predictive importance of these integrated descriptors is, therefore, biologically plausible. The resulting models were most promising as a basis for bioprocess monitoring that receives a low-millimolar NH3 range, particularly in algal cultivation or treatment systems where the dominant phototroph is known and the measurement protocol can be standardized. In such settings, applicability-domain and prediction-interval diagnostics allow operators to automate decisions such as whether data can be trusted, require confirmation, or should be discarded. By contrast, direct application as a broad bioindication tool in natural or mixed communities would require substantially wider validation because multiple concurrent stressors and taxonomic variability may alter the fluorescence response independently of NH3.

A second possible use case is biotesting with a standardized sentinel strain, which can be applied to estimate NH3 in the environment. This approach may be advantageous compared with bioindication because it reduces taxonomic variability and simplifies calibration, but it would require controlled exposure conditions and explicit evaluation of confounding stressors. The present study was not designed to establish a single sentinel-species protocol; rather, it was intended to determine whether NH3-responsive fluorescence signatures could be quantified across multiple phototrophic systems and whether cross-taxon calibration was feasible.

Nonetheless, the present study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. A key limitation is that the present models were trained under controlled NH3 exposure and were not challenged with other chemical or physical stresses that may induce overlapping fluorescence responses. The current framework should therefore be regarded as a controlled-condition NH3 prediction method rather than a universally stress-specific classifier. Future work should test specificity explicitly through multifactor experiments involving light, temperature, salinity, metals, herbicides, and mixed matrices such as real wastewater. This limitation is particularly important for cyanobacteria, whose fluorescence kinetics are influenced by phycobilisome-associated excitation transfer, state transitions, and the coupling between photosynthetic and respiratory electron transport. Accordingly, the present results should not be interpreted as supporting the direct transfer of green-algal OJIP coefficients or calibration functions to cyanobacteria. For operational use, cyanobacterial systems should first be calibrated and validated separately from those of green algae. In the present study, the Arthrospira data show that the fluorescence-to-NH3 framework can be calibrated within one cyanobacterial system under controlled conditions but does not establish a universal cyanobacterial model.

Future work should therefore distinguish protocol standardization from model transferability. A broadly similar measurement and preprocessing protocol, for example, one based on a common red measuring light source where instrumentally feasible, may provide a useful benchmarking framework across green algae and cyanobacteria. However, because cyanobacterial fluorescence is strongly shaped by lineage- and species-dependent state transitions and phycobilisome dynamics, absolute NH3 prediction will likely require species- or lineage-specific calibration, until cross-cyanobacterial validation demonstrates otherwise.

In addition, external validation was limited to two culture campaigns at one facility, and broader testing across instruments, light protocols, and sites is required. Differences in the excitation wavelength, saturation pulse intensity, and instrument sensitivity may further affect model transferability and must be standardized before operational deployment.

An additional limitation is that mechanistic interpretation remains indirect. The present study did not include complementary assays such as proton-flux measurements, ATPase activity, OEC activity, or Mn content analysis. Accordingly, the selected fluorescence features should not be interpreted as definitive markers of the specific inhibition sites. Instead, they indicate physiologically plausible regions of perturbation that require direct mechanistic validation in future studies. Future work should prioritize method standardization and validation across multiple instruments, multiple culture conditions, and sites to expand the training domain. A priority next step is validation in real wastewater and digestate-derived matrices, where additional contaminants and variable background chemistry may interfere with the fluorescence-based NH3 prediction. In the current study, the method was shown to distinguish NH3 toxicity from light-induced reductions in F v/F m during the early acclimation period of the cultures, highlighting the advantage of multivariable OJIP analysis over single-stress-sensitive indices. However, potential interference from other stressors (e.g., wastewater matrices, heat, salinity, and metals) should be confirmed through controlled multifactor experiments to test specificity. Combining fluorescence monitoring with more direct periodic measurements of NH3 and targeted mechanistic assays would further reduce the risk of misinterpretation.

With these developments, fluorescence-based NH3 monitoring has the potential to evolve into a biosensor platform for algal systems and potentially in broad aquatic systems. For example, pairing with highly sensitive taxa such as the marine green alga Nephroselmis pyriformis, which has an EC50 for NH3 in the micromolar range, may enable highly sensitive biosensors. Upon such an improvement in model training and validation, chlorophyll fluorescence combined with multivariable analyses may eventually enable the detection and quantification of ammonia in algal cultures, wastewater treatment facilities, industrial effluents, and natural waters.

This study demonstrated that rapid chlorophyll fluorescence transients analyzed with sparse regression can provide robust predictions of free-ammonia concentrations in algal systems. Among the tested models, Lasso regression yielded the most transferable performance, accurately predicting NH3 within each tested taxon and across the two green algal taxa, while cyanobacterial applications require separate and potentially species- or lineage-specific calibrations. The integration of AD and PI diagnostics ensures transparent uncertainty quantification, enabling safe and reproducible deployment in real-time hazard monitoring. This framework highlights the potential of interpretable machine learning to establish reagent-free biosensing tools for environmental risk assessment.

Supplementary Material

es5c18003_si_001.pdf (3.7MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Prof. Kintake Sonoike of Waseda University for his personal advice on the interpretation of fluorescence data. During the preparation of this work, the authors used ChatGPT by OpenAI and GitHub Copilot by Microsoft in order to improve the clarity of the English language and to refine programming code. After using these tools/services, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and took full responsibility for the content of the published article.

Curated data are available on the open archive Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.17358670). The Python code along with example data is also available on GitHub (https://github.com/MasaK2010/OJIPLasso) and on Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.17398400), which is subject to minor updates.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c18003.

  • Additional methods for fluorescence preprocessing, quality control, grouped nested cross-validation, standardization, and applicability-domain/prediction-interval calculations; comprehensive OJIP-derived parameter definitions and ablation tests; representative OJIP curves; temporal parameter changes; F v/F m correlation analyses; α optimization; validation-culture data; LC2 comparison; and pH time-course data (PDF)

M.K.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Investigation, WritingOriginal Draft; P.K.: Investigation, WritingReview and Editing; T.F.: Materials, Supervision, WritingReview and Editing; M.N.A.: Materials, WritingReview and Editing; R.M.: Materials, Supervision, WritingReview and Editing.

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement 101067916 (PhyToVALUE project). This work was partially supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) through the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows, JP22KJ3199). This work was also supported by the Department of Education of the Regional Government of Castilla y León and cofinanced by the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (Reference: CLU-2025-2-06).

The authors report no known commercial or proprietary interest in any product or concept discussed in this article.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Edwards T. M., Puglis H. J., Kent D. B., Durán J. L., Bradshaw L. M., Farag A. M.. Ammonia and Aquatic Ecosystems – A Review of Global Sources, Biogeochemical Cycling, and Effects on Fish. Sci. Total Environ. 2024;907:167911. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu L., Xu W., Lu X., Zhong B., Guo Y., Lu X., Zhao Y., He W., Wang S., Zhang X.. et al. Exploring Global Changes in Agricultural Ammonia Emissions and Their Contribution to Nitrogen Deposition since 1980. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2022;119(14):e2121998119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2121998119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beaudor M., Vuichard N., Lathiere J., Evangeliou N., Van Damme M., Clarisse L., Hauglustaine D.. Global Agricultural Ammonia Emissions Simulated with the ORCHIDEE Land Surface Model. Geosci. Model Dev. 2023;16(3):1053–1081. doi: 10.5194/gmd-16-1053-2023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhou B., Wang D., Yan C., Zhao G., Liu X., Zhang D., Liang J., Zhou Y., Li J., Zhou L.. A Novel Approach for Purifying Food Waste Anaerobic Digestate through Bio-Conditioning Dewatering Followed by Activated Sludge Process: A Case Study. Environ. Pollut. 2024;346:123644. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang Y., Li H., Ding K., Zhao X., Liu M., Xu L., Gu L., Li J., Li L., He Q.. et al. Improved Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste under Ammonia Stress by Side-Stream Hydrogen Domestication. Water Res. 2025;268(Pt B):122770. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.122770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Collos Y., Harrison P. J.. Acclimation and Toxicity of High Ammonium Concentrations to Unicellular Algae. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2014;80(1–2):8–23. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pang N., Bergeron A. D., Gu X., Fu X., Dong T., Yao Y., Chen S.. Recycling of Nutrients from Dairy Wastewater by Extremophilic Microalgae with High Ammonia Tolerance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020;54(23):15366–15375. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Geng Y., Xiong Z., Yang L., Lian C. A., Pavlostathis S. G., Qiu Z., Chen H., Luo Q., Liu Y., Liu Z., Shao P., Zou J. P., Jiang H., Luo S., Yu K., Luo X.. Bidirectional Enhancement of Nitrogen Removal by Indigenous Synergetic Microalgal–Bacterial Consortia in Harsh Low-C/N Wastewater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024;58(12):5394–5404. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c10322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Metin U., Altınbaş M.. Evaluating Ammonia Toxicity and Growth Kinetics of Four Different Microalgae Species. Microorganisms. 2024;12(8):1542. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12081542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kimura S., Yamada T., Ban S., Koyama M., Toda T.. Nutrient Removal from Anaerobic Digestion Effluents of Aquatic Macrophytes with the Green Alga, Chlorella Sorokiniana . Biochem. Eng. J. 2019;142(September 2018):170–177. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2018.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Posadas E., Szpak D., Lombó F., Domínguez A., Díaz I., Blanco S., García-Encina P. A., Muñoz R.. Feasibility Study of Biogas Upgrading Coupled with Nutrient Removal from Anaerobic Effluents Using Microalgae-Based Processes. J. Appl. Phycol. 2016;28(4):2147–2157. doi: 10.1007/s10811-015-0758-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stirbet A., Govindjee. On the Relation between the Kautsky Effect (Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Induction) and Photosystem II: Basics and Applications of the OJIP Fluorescence Transient. J. Photochem. Photobiol., B. 2011;104(1–2):236–257. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2010.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zubler A. V., Yoon J. Y.. Proximal Methods for Plant Stress Detection Using Optical Sensors and Machine Learning. Biosensors. 2020;10(12):193. doi: 10.3390/bios10120193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Swoczyna T., Kalaji H. M., Bussotti F., Mojski J., Pollastrini M.. Environmental Stress - What Can We Learn from Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Analysis in Woody Plants? A Review. Front. Plant Sci. 2022;13:1048582. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1048582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Das S., Lizon F., Gevaert F., Bialais C., Duong G., Ouddane B., Souissi S.. Assessing Indicators of Arsenic Toxicity Using Variable Fluorescence in a Commercially Valuable Microalgae: Physiological and Toxicological Aspects. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023;452:131215. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Scognamiglio V., Antonacci A., Arduini F., Moscone D., Campos E. V. R., Fraceto L. F., Palleschi G.. An Eco-Designed Paper-Based Algal Biosensor for Nanoformulated Herbicide Optical Detection. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019;373:483–492. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hu L., Liang T., Yin G., Zhao N.. Quantitative Representation of Water Quality Biotoxicity by Algal Photosynthetic Inhibition. Toxics. 2023;11(6):493. doi: 10.3390/toxics11060493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Duarte B., Gameiro C., Utkin A. B., Matos A. R., Caçador I., Fonseca V., Cabrita M. T.. A Multivariate Approach to Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Data for Trace Element Ecotoxicological Trials Using a Model Marine Diatom. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2021;250(May 2020):107170. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2021.107170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ejaz I., Li W., Naseer M. A., Li Y., Qin W., Farooq M., Li F., Huang S., Zhang Y., Wang Z., Sun Z., Yu K.. Detection of Combined Frost and Drought Stress in Wheat Using Hyperspectral and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2023;30:103051. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2023.103051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Duarte B., Feijão E., Cruz de Carvalho R., Franzitta M., Carlos Marques J., Caçador I., Teresa Cabrita M., Fonseca V. F.. Unlocking Kautsky’s Dark Box: Development of an Optical Toxicity Classification Tool (OPTOX Index) with Marine Diatoms Exposed to Emerging Contaminants. Ecol. Indic. 2021;131:108238. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108238. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lu M., Gao P., Hu J., Hou J., Wang D.. A Classification Method of Stress in Plants Using Unsupervised Learning Algorithm and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Technology. Front. Plant Sci. 2023;14:1202092. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1202092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Belkin S., Boussiba S.. High Internal PH Conveys Ammonia Resistance in Spirulina Platensis. Bioresour. Technol. 1991;38(2–3):167–169. doi: 10.1016/0960-8524(91)90149-E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Markou G., Depraetere O., Muylaert K.. Effect of Ammonia on the Photosynthetic Activity of Arthrospira and Chlorella: A Study on Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Electron Transport. Algal Res. 2016;16:449–457. doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2016.03.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Álvarez X., Otero A.. Nutrient Removal from the Centrate of Anaerobic Digestion of High Ammonium Industrial Wastewater by a Semi-Continuous Culture of Arthrospira Sp. and Nostoc Sp. PCC 7413. J. Appl. Phycol. 2020;32(5):2785–2794. doi: 10.1007/s10811-020-02175-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Markou G.. Fed-Batch Cultivation of Arthrospira and Chlorella in Ammonia-Rich Wastewater: Optimization of Nutrient Removal and Biomass Production. Bioresour. Technol. 2015;193:35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ogawa T., Suzuki K., Sonoike K.. Respiration Interacts With Photosynthesis Through the Acceptor Side of Photosystem I, Reflected in the Dark-to-Light Induction Kinetics of Chlorophyll Fluorescence in the Cyanobacterium Synechocystis Sp. PCC 6803. Front. Plant Sci. 2021;12:717968. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.717968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Campbell D., Hurry V., Clarke A. K., Gustafsson P., Öquist G.. Chlorophyll Fluorescence Analysis of Cyanobacterial Photosynthesis and Acclimation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998;62(3):667–683. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.62.3.667-683.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kishi M., Toda T.. Carbon Fixation Properties of Three Alkalihalophilic Microalgal Strains under High Alkalinity. J. Appl. Phycol. 2018;30(1):401–410. doi: 10.1007/s10811-017-1226-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pandit P. R., Fulekar M. H., Karuna M. S. L.. Effect of Salinity Stress on Growth, Lipid Productivity, Fatty Acid Composition, and Biodiesel Properties in Acutodesmus Obliquus and Chlorella Vulgaris. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017;24(15):13437–13451. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8875-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yu C., Hu Y., Zhang Y., Luo W., Zhang J., Xu P., Qian J., Li J., Yu J., Liu J., Zhou W., Shao S.. Concurrent Enhancement of Biomass Production and Phycocyanin Content in Salt-Stressed Arthrospira Platensis: A Glycine Betaine- Supplementation Approach. Chemosphere. 2024;353(4):141387. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Misumi M., Katoh H., Tomo T., Sonoike K.. Relationship Between Photochemical Quenching and Non-Photochemical Quenching in Six Species of Cyanobacteria Reveals Species Difference in Redox State and Species Commonality in Energy Dissipation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016;57(7):1510–1517. doi: 10.1093/PCP/PCV185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sekine M., Yoshida A., Kishi M., Furuya K., Toda T.. Free Ammonia Tolerance of Cyanobacteria Depends on Intracellular PH. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2023;47(September 2022):102562. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2022.102562. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Khoo K. H., Culberson C. H., Bates R. G.. Thermodynamics of the Dissociation of Ammonium Ion in Seawater from 5 to 40°C. J. Solution Chem. 1977;6(4):281–290. doi: 10.1007/BF00645459. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Bates R. G., Pinching G. D.. Acidic Dissociation Constant of Ammonium Ion at 0 to 50 C, and the Base Strength of Ammonia. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 1949;42(5):419–430. doi: 10.6028/jres.042.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Bell T. G., Johnson M. T., Jickells T. D., Liss P. S.. Ammonia/Ammonium Dissociation Coefficient in Seawater: A Significant Numerical Correction. Environ. Chem. 2007;4(3):183–186. doi: 10.1071/EN07032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Parsy A., Guyoneaud R., Lot M. C., Baldoni-Andrey P., Périé F., Sambusiti C.. Impact of Salinities, Metals and Organic Compounds Found in Saline Oil & Gas Produced Water on Microalgae and Cyanobacteria. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022;234:113351. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Strasser, R. J. ; Tsimilli-Michael, M. ; Srivastava, A. . Analysis of the Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Transient. In Chlorophyll a Fluorescence; Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration, Papageorgiou, G. C. ; Govindjee, Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2004; Vol. 19, pp. 321–362. 10.1007/978-1-4020-3218-9_12 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Strasser, R. J. ; Srivastava, A. ; Tsimilli-Michael, M. . The Fluorescence Transient as a Tool to Characterize and Screen Photosynthetic Samples. In Probing Photosynthesis: Mechanism, Regulation & Adaptation; Yunus, M. ; Pathre, U. ; Mohanty, P. , Eds.; CRC Press, 2000, pp. 445–483. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kalaji H. M., Jajoo A., Oukarroum A., Brestic M., Zivcak M., Samborska I. A., Cetner M. D., Łukasik I., Goltsev V., Ladle R. J.. Chlorophyll a Fluorescence as a Tool to Monitor Physiological Status of Plants under Abiotic Stress Conditions. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2016;38(4):102. doi: 10.1007/s11738-016-2113-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Akinyemi O. O., Čepl J., Keski-Saari S., Tomášková I., Stejskal J., Kontunen-Soppela S., Keinänen M.. Derivative-Based Time-Adjusted Analysis of Diurnal and within-Tree Variation in the OJIP Fluorescence Transient of Silver Birch. Photosynth. Res. 2023;157(2–3):133–146. doi: 10.1007/s11120-023-01033-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhong S., Zhang K., Bagheri M., Burken J. G., Gu A., Li B., Ma X., Marrone B. L., Ren Z. J., Schrier J., Shi W., Tan H., Wang T., Wang X., Wong B. M., Xiao X., Yu X., Zhu J. J., Zhang H.. Machine Learning: New Ideas and Tools in Environmental Science and Engineering. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021;55(19):12741–12754. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c01339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Malapascua J. R. F., Jerez C. G., Sergejevová M., Figueroa F. L., Masojídek J.. Photosynthesis Monitoring to Optimize Growth of Microalgal Mass Cultures: Application of Chlorophyll Fluorescence Techniques. Aquat. Biol. 2014;22:123–140. doi: 10.3354/ab00597. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tibshirani R.. Regression Shrinkage and Selection Via the Lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. 1996;58(1):267–288. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Hoerl A. E., Kennard R. W.. Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems. Technometrics. 1970;12(1):55–67. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hastie, T. ; Tibshirani, R. ; Friedman, J. . The Elements of Statistical Learning; 2nd ed.; Springer Series in Statistics, Springer New York: New York, NY, 2009. 10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zou H., Hastie T.. Regularization and Variable Selection via the Elastic Net. J. R. Statist. Soc. B. 2005;67(2):301–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Breiman L.. Random Forests. Mach. Learn. 2001;45(1):5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Friedman J. H.. Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine. Ann. Statist. 2001;29(5):1189–1232. doi: 10.1214/aos/1013203451. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Anderson M. J., Willis T. J.. Canonical Analysis Of Principal Coordinates: A Useful Method Of Constrained Ordination For Ecology. Ecology. 2003;84:511–525. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0511:CAOPCA]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Krstajic D., Buturovic L. J., Leahy D. E., Thomas S.. Cross-Validation Pitfalls When Selecting and Assessing Regression and Classification Models. J. Cheminf. 2014;6(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-6-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Varoquaux G., Raamana P. R., Engemann D. A., Hoyos-Idrobo A., Schwartz Y., Thirion B.. Assessing and Tuning Brain Decoders: Cross-Validation, Caveats, and Guidelines. Neuroimage. 2017;145:166–179. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Varma S., Simon R.. Bias in Error Estimation When Using Cross-Validation for Model Selection. BMC Bioinf. 2006;7(1):91. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Rossi S., Díez-Montero R., Rueda E., Castillo Cascino F., Parati K., García J., Ficara E.. Free Ammonia Inhibition in Microalgae and Cyanobacteria Grown in Wastewaters: Photo-Respirometric Evaluation and Modelling. Bioresour. Technol. 2020;305(February):123046. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sekine M., Yoshida A., Akizuki S., Kishi M., Toda T.. Microalgae Cultivation Using Undiluted Anaerobic Digestate by Introducing Aerobic Nitrification–Desulfurization Treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 2020;82(6):1070–1080. doi: 10.2166/wst.2020.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Markou G., Muylaert K.. Effect of Light Intensity on the Degree of Ammonia Toxicity on PSII Activity of Arthrospira Platensis and Chlorella Vulgaris. Bioresour. Technol. 2016;216:453–461. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sharma N., Nagar S., Thakur M., Suriyakumar P., Kataria S., Shanker A. K., Landi M., Anand A.. Photosystems under High Light Stress: Throwing Light on Mechanism and Adaptation. Photosynthetica. 2023;61(2):250–263. doi: 10.32615/ps.2023.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Didaran F., Kordrostami M., Ghasemi-Soloklui A. A., Pashkovskiy P., Kreslavski V., Kuznetsov V., Allakhverdiev S. I.. The Mechanisms of Photoinhibition and Repair in Plants under High Light Conditions and Interplay with Abiotic Stressors. J. Photochem. Photobiol., B. 2024;259:113004. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2024.113004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Liu N., Zhang H., Zhao J., Xu Y., Ge F.. Mechanisms of Cetyltrimethyl Ammonium Chloride-Induced Toxicity to Photosystem II Oxygen Evolution Complex of Chlorella Vulgaris F1068. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020;383:121063. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sandusky P. O., Yocum C. F.. The Chloride Requirement for Photosynthetic Oxygen Evolution. Analysis of the Effects of Chloride and Other Anions on Amine Inhibition of the Oxygen-Evolving Complex. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Bioenerg. 1984;766(3):603–611. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(84)90121-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Drath M., Kloft N., Batschauer A., Marin K., Novak J., Forchhammer K.. Ammonia Triggers Photodamage of Photosystem II in the Cyanobacterium Synechocystis Sp. Strain PCC 6803. Plant Physiol. 2008;147(1):206–215. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.117218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Jedmowski C., Brüggemann W.. Imaging of Fast Chlorophyll Fluorescence Induction Curve (OJIP) Parameters, Applied in a Screening Study with Wild Barley (Hordeum Spontaneum) Genotypes under Heat Stress. J. Photochem. Photobiol., B. 2015;151:153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Tsimilli-Michael M.. Special issue in honour of Prof. Reto J. Strasser - Revisiting JIP-test: An educative review on concepts, assumptions, approximations, definitions and terminology. Photosynthetica. 2020;58(SPECIAL ISSUE):275–292. doi: 10.32615/ps.2019.150. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tóth S. Z., Schansker G., Strasser R. J.. A Non-Invasive Assay of the Plastoquinone Pool Redox State Based on the OJIP-Transient. Photosynth. Res. 2007;93(1):193–203. doi: 10.1007/s11120-007-9179-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Degen G. E., Johnson M. P.. Photosynthetic Control at the Cytochrome B6f Complex. Plant Cell. 2024;36(10):4065–4079. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koae133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Tropsha A., Gramatica P., Gombar V. K.. The Importance of Being Earnest: Validation Is the Absolute Essential for Successful Application and Interpretation of QSPR Models. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2003;22(1):69–77. doi: 10.1002/qsar.200390007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Sushko I., Novotarskyi S., Körner R., Pandey A. K., Cherkasov A., Li J., Gramatica P., Hansen K., Schroeter T., Müller K. R., Xi L., Liu H., Yao X., Öberg T., Hormozdiari F., Dao P., Sahinalp C., Todeschini R., Polishchuk P., Artemenko A., Kuz’min V., Martin T. M., Young D. M., Fourches D., Muratov E., Tropsha A., Baskin I., Horvath D., Marcou G., Muller C., Varnek A., Prokopenko V. V., Tetko I. V.. Applicability Domains for Classification Problems: Benchmarking of Distance to Models for Ames Mutagenicity Set. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010;50(12):2094–2111. doi: 10.1021/ci100253r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Jaworska J., Nikolova-Jeliazkova N., Aldenberg T.. QSAR Applicability Domain Estimation by Projection of the Training Set in Descriptor Space: A Review. Altern. Lab. Anim. 2005;33(5):445–459. doi: 10.1177/026119290503300508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. OECD Guidance Document on the Validation of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationship [(Q)SAR] Models; OECD Series On Testing And Assessment; OECD, 2014. 10.1787/9789264085442-en [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Källqvist T., Svenson A.. Assessment of Ammonia Toxicity in Tests with the Microalga, Nephroselmis Pyriformis, Chlorophyta. Water Res. 2003;37(3):477–484. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00361-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

es5c18003_si_001.pdf (3.7MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Curated data are available on the open archive Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.17358670). The Python code along with example data is also available on GitHub (https://github.com/MasaK2010/OJIPLasso) and on Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.17398400), which is subject to minor updates.


Articles from Environmental Science & Technology are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES