Abstract
A successive matching-to-sample procedure that entails the sequential presentation of sample and test stimuli and the monitoring of response rates in a go/no-go discrimination of matching and nonmatching stimuli was studied as an alternative to the familiar delayed-matching paradigm of animal short-term memory. Three within-subject experiments studied the effects of sample duration (1 to 12 seconds), intertrial interval (5 to 50 seconds), and retention interval (1 to 50 seconds) on the pigeon's successive-matching performance. The results revealed that retention was (a) an increasing function of sample duration and intertrial interval, and (b) a decreasing function of retention interval. These results were in accord with those of more traditional short-term memory paradigms, and reveal the suitability of the successive-matching procedure for studying memory processes.
Keywords: short-term memory, matching to sample, successive stimulus presentation, discriminative control, sample duration, intertrial interval, retention interval, key peck, pigeons
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c99a3/c99a3972315e8756b7498e90d49f2dc30f69520a" alt="153"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c875f/c875fe40341b2530bc723150716579c3d32e3bab" alt="154"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7866f/7866f5ba84684a06750fc38bc072711d688cfa25" alt="155"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4690e/4690ef733ee37423df374483c1aa207b25536cce" alt="156"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f6a3/5f6a3169835422752cc9e690b75939ff176cd7bf" alt="157"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b12c/1b12cdc5611414390a0eaa5df62f13de2a61f7db" alt="158"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0500/e05005e8302d9ae60776a1ce99081131c14da6da" alt="159"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd889/fd889efffe668dfd0c5f993755e0a10075b03bae" alt="160"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2742/e2742a8db4b2445bea6a174707c552001dd8a5bb" alt="161"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ea1b/6ea1b62af3b3a0cc4bfda0b49bea4f7cb091c04e" alt="162"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BLOUGH D. S. Delayed matching in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959 Apr;2:151–160. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1959.2-151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berryman R., Cumming W. W., Nevin J. A. Acquisition of delayed matching in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jan;6(1):101–107. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brodigan D. L., Peterson G. B. Two-choice conditional discrimination performance of pigeons as a function of reward expectancy, prechoice delay, and domesticity. Anim Learn Behav. 1976 May;4(2):121–124. doi: 10.3758/bf03214021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carter D. E., Eckerman D. A. Symbolic matching by pigeons: rate of learning complex discriminations predicted from simple discriminations. Science. 1975 Feb 21;187(4177):662–664. doi: 10.1126/science.1114318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herman L. M., Gordon J. A. Auditory delayed matching in the bottlenose dolphin. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jan;21(1):19–26. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holt G. L., Shafer J. N. Function of intertrial interval in matching-to-sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jan;19(1):181–186. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Looney T. A., Cohen L. R., Brady J. H., Cohen P. S. Conditional discrimination performance by pigeons on a response-independent procedure. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Mar;27(2):363–370. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maki W. S., Jr, Leith C. R. Shared attention in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Mar;19(2):345–349. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maki W. S., Jr, Leuin T. C. Information-processing by pigeons. Science. 1972 May 5;176(4034):535–536. doi: 10.1126/science.176.4034.535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mason M., Wilson M. Temporal differentiation and recognition memory for visual stimuli in rhesus monkeys. J Exp Psychol. 1974 Sep;103(3):383–390. doi: 10.1037/h0037233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shimp C. P., Moffitt M. Short-term memory in the pigeon: delayed-pair-comparison procedures and some results. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jul;28(1):13–25. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.28-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkie D. M., Wilson C. S. Control of pigeons' pecking by trace stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Mar;27(2):293–299. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]