Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Psychiatry logoLink to Indian Journal of Psychiatry
. 2026 Jun 20;68(6):510–516. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry_61_26

A bibliometric assessment of the Indian Journal of Psychiatry: Trends, impact, and collaboration (2009–2024)

Sandeep Grover 1,✉, Raju Vaishya 1, Brij M Gupta 2, Namita Mahapatra 3, S M Chaman 4, S Madhu 5
PMCID: PMC13327397  PMID: 42396427

ABSTRACT

Background:

The Indian Journal of Psychiatry (IJP) serves as a premier repository for psychiatric research in India.

Aim:

This study conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to evaluate the journal’s publication trends and citation impact from 2009 to 2024.

Methods:

Bibliographic data were retrieved from the Scopus database, covering the period from January 2009 to December 2024. A final dataset of 2,357 publications was analyzed for this paper.

Results:

The journal experienced robust growth, registering an average annual publication growth rate of 9.16% over the 16 years. The journal’s Impact Factor rose significantly from 0.384 in 2010 to a peak of 3.1 in 2022. Authors from India contributed 88.63% of the total output, anchored by institutions such as the National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, and the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, although international contributions from countries like Switzerland (Citation per paper [CPP]: 22.36), Germany (CPP: 17.68), Canada (CPP: 17.68), and Italy (CPP: 17.63) demonstrated a higher citation efficiency compared to those from India (11.6). The authorship pattern revealed a definitive shift from single-author (reduced from 28.65% to 9.9%) to collaborative, multiauthor research. Thematically, research concentrated on core areas such as depression and schizophrenia, while displaying responsiveness to emerging crises like the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion:

The IJP has consistently demonstrated a trajectory of upward influence and academic reputation over the past 16 years. While the journal serves as a vibrant ecosystem for domestic research, future strategies should focus on leveraging international collaborations to enhance global visibility and citation impact further.

Keywords: Bibliometric analysis, citation analysis, impact factor, Indian Journal of Psychiatry, mental health, research trends, scientometrics

INTRODUCTION

Scientific publications serve as repositories of professional knowledge, stimulate research, and act as a permanent record of the expanding horizons of knowledge in any field.[1] The Indian Journal of Psychiatry (IJP), the official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society, which was established in 1949 as the Indian Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry, has been central to the mission of expanding psychiatric knowledge. The journal was renamed as the Indian Journal of Psychiatry in 1958. Over the last 76 years, the journal has undergone significant change,[2] and among the few journals published in India, that publishes 12 issues annually. Currently, the IJP is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal indexed in major international databases, including PubMed Central, Scopus, and Web of Science (https://journals.lww.com/indianjpsychiatry/pages/default.aspx), and has experienced a general upward trajectory in its impact factor and global reach.

Over time, the journal’s focus has been guided by contemporary issues, with early issues featuring articles on psychoanalysis. The current focus of the journal is on publishing more methodologically sound and rigorous research.[3]

In the current publishing industry, evaluating the quality of journals is a challenging task. Several methods have been proposed to evaluate the quality of a journal.[4,5] Among these, one method is bibliometric analysis. Consequently, bibliometric analysis has become an indispensable tool for systematic evaluation. By quantifying publication patterns, citation dynamics, and authorship networks, bibliometrics provide deep insights into the dissemination of knowledge and the thematic evolution of a domain.[6] The existing literature demonstrates the diverse applications of these parameters for assessing different journals.[7] Although there are bibliometric evaluations for some journals published in India, there is no such analysis for the IJP. Accordingly, utilizing Scopus data and visualization techniques, this paper aims to analyze the IJP’s publication structure (i.e., number of publications, impact factor, keywords, etc.), citation dynamics, and prominent contributors to the journal over the last 16 years.

METHODOLOGY

The bibliographic data for this study were retrieved from the Scopus database, which was chosen for its comprehensive and broader coverage of peer-reviewed medical literature. The search strategy focused on the source title to isolate publications specifically published in IJP. The study period was restricted to 16 years, covering the period from January 1, 2009 (i.e. the time frame from which the IJP got listed in PubMed) to December 31, 2024. The specific search query employed was: SRCTITLE (“Indian Journal of Psychiatry”) AND PUBYEAR >2008 AND PUBYEAR < 2025 AND (LIMIT-TO (EXACTSRCTITLE, “Indian Journal of Psychiatry”)).

The initial search yielded a total of 3,131 documents. After applying the requisite filters and date limitations, a final dataset of 2,357 publications was retained for analysis. The bibliographic records were exported in Comma-Separated Values (CSV) format for further processing. The data analysis involved quantitative and visual methodologies using the following software:

  • Microsoft Excel: Used for data cleaning and basic descriptive statistics.

  • VOSviewer (https://www.vosviewer.com/): Employed to construct and visualize network maps, specifically for co-authorship networks and keyword co-occurrence overlays.

  • Biblioshiny (RStudio): Utilized via the bibliometrix R package (https://www.bibliometrix.org/) to generate additional conceptual maps and perform advanced metric calculations.

The different parameters that were assessed in the study included Citations per paper (CPP), Relative Citation Index (RCI), and Total Link Strength (TLS). CPP reflects the number of times a paper in the database has been cited. The RCI is computed as the actual number of citations received by the paper divided by the expected citation rate of its peer field. TLC is a standardized quantitative metric that evaluates the overall weight and intensity of the connection between a specific item (such as an author, country, or keyword) and all other items in the dataset.

RESULTS

Journal metrics: The bibliometric indicators for the IJP between 2009 and 2024 show a robust upward trajectory in scholarly influence, despite minor fluctuations in recent years. The journal’s Impact Factor (IF) experienced an eightfold increase, rising from 0.384 in 2010 to a peak of 3.1 in 2022, before settling at 1.7 in 2023. Similarly, the CiteScore grew steadily from 0.7 in 2011 to a high of 4.4 in 2022. The SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) mirrored this pattern, climbing from 0.125 in 2010 to a maximum of 0.771 in 2022 [Supplementary Table 1].

Supplementary Table 1.

Trends of Indian Journal of Psychiatry’s metrices

Year Impact Factor Cite Score Scimago Journal Rank (SJR)
2010 0.384 Not Available 0.125
2011 0.617 0.7 0.213
2012 0.726 1.2 0.320
2013 0.849 1.4 0.406
2014 0.839 1.6 0.349
2015 0.982 1.8 0.549
2016 0.81 2.1 0.514
2017 1.061 1.5 0.408
2018 1.122 1.5 0.542
2019 1.121 1.4 0.398
2020 1.759 1.8 0.485
2021 2.983 3.1 0.681
2022 3.1 4.4 0.771
2023 1.7 4.4 0.612
2024 2.0 2.2 0.518

The SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) measures a journal’s prestige and influence by evaluating the quantity and quality of citations it receives, giving more weight to citations from more reputable journals. It calculates the average number of weighted citations per paper over a 3-year period, helping researchers assess impact and choose where to publish by categorizing journals into quartiles (Q1-Q4) within their subject areas. In 2024, Indian Journal of Psychiatry is categorized as Q-3 journal. CiteScore is a metric that is calculated based on the Scopus data, and it measures a journal’s average citation impact by dividing the citations received by articles in the last 4 complete years by the number of documents published in those same 4 years. It provides a transparent, alternative measure to Journal Impact Factor, ranking journals by subject area and offering insights for publication strategy and collection development

Annual growth and citation trend: Between 2009 and 2024, the IJP published 2,357 papers, exhibiting a robust average annual growth rate of 9.16%, with output rising from 86 papers in 2009 to a peak of 228 in 2020 and 222 in 2024. While papers with Indian authors (i.e., papers with at least one Indian author) dominated the landscape, accounting for 88.63% of the total output (2,089 papers) and achieving a higher citation impact (11.60 CPP) compared to foreign contributions (11.49 CPP), the foreign papers (i.e. papers with authors from countries other than India) demonstrated a significantly higher annual growth rate of 29.25%. The articles published in the journal accumulated 26,726 total citations with an overall CPP of 11.33. Notably, the papers published in the earlier period (2009–2016) achieved a higher CPP of 17.22 compared to 7.93 for papers published in the later period (2017–2024) [Table 1].

Table 1.

Year-wise growth of publications and citations

Year TP TC CPP TP Indian TP Foreign
2009 86 1311 15.24 78 19
2010 89 1548 17.39 76 26
2011 86 1838 21.37 83 14
2012 102 1531 15.01 92 19
2013 149 4178 28.04 132 30
2014 100 1066 10.66 97 13
2015 133 2250 16.92 119 22
2016 120 1169 9.74 109 24
2017 145 2006 13.83 122 39
2018 174 2027 11.65 160 25
2019 221 2696 12.20 196 43
2020 228 2724 11.95 176 71
2021 143 719 5.03 126 27
2022 156 633 4.06 138 30
2023 203 694 3.42 181 38
2024 222 336 1.51 204 31
2009-16 865 14891 17.22 786 167
2017-24 1492 11835 7.93 1303 304
2009-24 2357 26726 11.33 2089 471
Total Indian papers 2089 24230 11.60
Total Foreign papers 471 5412 11.49

TP: Total publications; TC: Total citations; CPP: Citations per paper

Document types: An analysis of document types among the 2,357 publications (2009–2024) indicates that the IJP is focussed on primary research, with original articles constituting 50.8% (1,197 papers) of the total output. Letter to the Editor (20.7%) and review articles (17.35%) followed as the next most common formats. In terms of citation impact, conference papers (which typically indicate award/oration papers published in the journal) registered the highest CPP at 36.86, surpassing reviews (21.06 CPP) and original articles (12.10 CPP) [Supplementary Table 2].

Supplementary Table 2.

Distribution of document types

Document Type TP TC CPP %TP
Original Article 1197 14486 12.10 50.78
Letters to the Editor 488 1253 2.57 20.70
Review Articles 409 8615 21.06 17.35
Editorials 168 1454 8.65 7.13
Notes# 46 229 4.98 1.95
Short Surveys# 22 173 7.86 0.93
Conference Papers# 14 516 36.86 0.59
Erratum 13 0 0.00 0.55
Grand Total 2357 26726 11.34

TP: Total publications; TC: Total citations; CPP: Citations per paper. Although journal does not have specific categories for Notes, Short Surveys, and Conference papers, this categorization was based on the categorization available in SCOPUS database

Citation Distribution Pattern: The citation analysis [Supplementary Table 3] reveals a highly skewed, long-tail distribution, where a select core of elite papers drives the journal’s impact factor, while the majority of research receives modest attention. Out of 2,357 publications, 81.3% were cited at least once; however, the bulk of these (54.1%) clustered within the 1–10 citation range. As citation frequency increased, paper volume tapered sharply: Only 2.8% of publications were cited 51–100 times, and a mere 1.25% papers were cited more than 100 times. At the apex, only six “landmark” papers (0.25%) surpassed 240 citations.

Supplementary Table 3.

Distribution of citations

Citation Range Publication Numbers Number of Papers Total Citations
1-10 642-1918 1277 5150
11-20 342-641 300 4439
21-30 204-341 138 3493
31-40 134-203 70 2460
41-50 95-133 39 1739
51-100 30-94 65 4516
101-183 7-29 23 3101
240-425 1-6 6 1828
Zero citation 1919-2357 439

Authorship pattern: The authorship pattern of the IJP demonstrates a clear and consistent shift from single-author to multiauthor collaboration papers [Supplementary Table 4]. During the years 2009–2012, single-author papers formed 28.65% of all the papers, and this reduced to 19.20% during the period of 2013–2016, 16.6% during the period of 2017–2020, and 9.9% for the period of 2021–2024.

Supplementary Table 4.

Pattern of authorship

Period Number of papers with the authorship contribution

1 2 3 4 5-10 >10 Total
2009-12 104 89 74 42 52 02 363
2013-16 97 116 103 81 97 08 502
2017-20 127 138 170 136 179 15 765
2021-24 72 89 161 150 219 36 727
Total 400 432 508 409 547 61 2357

Most Productive Countries: Notably, the majority of papers (2,089, 88.6% of the total) originated from India. However, in addition to India, the journal published papers with authors from 74 more countries. While papers from India surpassed the average productivity threshold (i.e., the papers by authors from India had a CPP higher than the mean for all the papers, irrespective of country of the author), papers from several other countries demonstrated superior citation efficiency. Publications from authors from seven nations, i.e., Switzerland (CPP 22.36), Canada, Germany, Italy, the United States of America (USA), and the United Kingdom (UK), registered citation impact and Relative Citation Indices (RCIs) significantly above the group average [Table 2].

Table 2.

Contribution and Citation Impact of the top contributing countries

Name TP TC CPP RCI
India 2089 24230 11.60 0.90
United Kingdom (UK) 96 1384 14.41 1.27
United States (US) 95 1671 17.58 1.55
Turkey 53 296 5.58 0.49
Australia 49 491 10.02 0.88
Canada 38 672 17.68 1.56
Nepal 16 128 8 0.71
Germany 16 283 17.68 1.56
China 15 108 7.2 0.63
Iran 13 100 7.69 0.68
Sri Lanka 12 82 6.83 0.60
Italy 11 194 17.63 1.55
Switzerland 11 246 22.36 1.97
Pakistan 10 129 12.90 1.14
Total of the top 14 countries 2524 32510 12.88 1.14
Total output 2357 26726 11.34 1.00

TP: Total publications; TC: Total citations; CPP: Citations per paper; RCI: Relative Citation Index

NETWORK COLLABORATION MAP BETWEEN AUTHORS FROM DIFFERENT COUNTRIES

While the collaboration network among authors from top countries was evaluated, a network of five distinct clusters with a Total Link Strength (TLS) (which is a measure of overall intensity of the connection between the authors) of 290 emerged, involving authors from the top 13 countries. Authors from India occupied the central node, anchoring the network through strong ties with the authors from the USA and the UK Cluster. Other significant groupings included a diverse interregional block comprising Australia, China, and Germany (Red Cluster), as well as a North American-Asian axis connecting Canada, Iran, and the USA (Green Cluster). Smaller clusters involving authors from Nepal, Turkey, and Pakistan also highlight regional connections [Supplementary Figure 1 (262.5KB, tif) ].

TOP 25 MOST PRODUCTIVE ORGANIZATIONS

Authors from 2,571 organizations contributed to the publications in IJP, with authors from the top 25 organizations accounting for 73.61% of all publications and 92.35% of total citations. Publications from the six organizations exceeded the average productivity (69.4) threshold, led by authors from National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, with 428 papers, followed by authors from Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh (223 papers), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi (153 papers), JSS Medical College and Hospital (JSSMCH), Mysore (148 papers) and King George’s Medical University (KGMU), Lucknow (99 papers). In terms of citation impact, publications from 11 organizations surpassed the group average (14.23 CPP and 1.25 RCI). Notably, publications with authors from the Gautam Hospital and Research Centre (33.58 and 2.96), Fortis Healthcare Ltd (27.83 and 2.45), Topiwala National (TN) Medical College and Bai Yamunabai Laxman Nair (BYL Nair Ch.) Hospital, Mumbai (18.73 and 1.65), AIIMS, Rishikesh (18.6 and 1.64), AIIMS, Raipur (18.0 and 1.59), Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College (LTMMC), Mumbai (16.59 and 1.46), NIMHANS, Bengaluru (16.04 and 1.41), JSS Medical College and Hospital (JSSMCH), Mysore (15.97 and 1.41), KGMU, Lucknow (15.84 and 1.40), and PGIMER, Chandigarh (15.13 and 1.33) achieved the citation impact rates, higher than the average citation impact [Supplementary Table 5].

Supplement Table 5.

Top 25 most productive organizations

Name of the organization TP TC CPP RCI ICP %ICP TLS
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore 428 6869 16.05 1.42 42 9.81 518
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh 223 3374 15.13 1.33 12 5.38 461
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi 153 2164 14.14 1.25 7 4.58 292
JSS Medical College and Hospital (JSSMCH), Mysore 148 2364 15.97 1.41 21 14.19 286
King George’s Medical University (KGMU), Lucknow 99 1568 15.84 1.40 13 13.13 331
Kasturba Medical College (KMC), Manipal 62 611 9.85 0.87 6 9.68 140
Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry 55 621 11.29 1.00 7 12.73 190
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MIHFW), New Delhi 54 325 6.02 0.53 6 11.11 163
Central Institute of Psychiatry (CIP), Ranchi 47 489 10.40 0.92 7 14.89 47
Government Medical College and Hospital (GMCH), Chandigarh 40 235 5.88 0.52 2 5.00 59
Topiwala National (TN) Medical College and Bai Yamunabai Laxman Nair (BYL Nair Ch.) Hospital, Mumbai. 37 693 18.73 1.65 2 5.41 136
Advanced Medical Research Institute (AMRI) HospitaL, Kolkata 35 422 12.06 1.06 0 0.00 24
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Riskihesh 35 651 18.60 1.64 3 8.57 149
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneshwar 34 373 10.97 0.97 4 11.76 108
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur 33 365 11.06 0.98 0 0.00 140
St. John‘s National Academy of Health Sciences (SJNAHS), Bangalore 31 269 8.68 0.77 6 19.35 49
Christian Medical College (CMC), Vellore 29 326 11.24 0.99 3 10.34 53
LokmanyaTilak Municipal Medical College (LTMMC), Mumbai 29 481 16.59 1.46 6 20.69 86
Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences (IHBAS), New Delhi 29 153 5.28 0.47 2 6.90 41
Gautam Hospital and Research Centre (GHRC), Jaipur 26 873 33.58 2.96 0 0.00 113
Medical College, Calcutta 24 111 4.63 0.41 5 20.83 67
Fortis Healthcare Ltd 24 668 27.83 2.45 2 8.33 186
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Raipur 22 396 18.00 1.59 3 13.64 124
Schizophrenia Research Foundation Chennai 19 163 8.58 0.76 4 21.05 68
RG Kar Medical College 19 118 6.21 0.55 1 5.26 131
Total of top 25 organization 1735 24682 14.23 1.25 164 9.45 3962
Total publications in the journal 2357 26726 11.34 1.00
Share of top 25 organizations in global total 73.61 92.35

TP: Total publications; TC: Total citations; CPP: Citations per paper; Relative Citation Indices (RCIs); ICP: International Collaborative Papers; %ICP: Percentage of International Collaborative Papers; TLS: Total Link Strength

Collaboration among different institutes: Authors from NIHMANS, Bangalore, had a TLS of 518 with authors from PGIMER, Chandigarh, and that of 461 with authors from AIIMS, New Delhi. These are followed by JSSMCH, Mysore, and KGMU, Lucknow, which have registered TLS scores of 286 and 331. They are most collaborative among themselves and with the above three organizations.

Authors from NIHMANS, Bangalore, had the strongest collaborative links with authors from JSSMCH, Mysore (n = 43), PGIMER, Chandigarh (n = 22), KGMU, Lucknow (n = 22), and AIIMS, New Delhi (n = 11). Authors from PGIMER, Chandigarh, registered the highest number of collaborative links with authors from AIIMS, New Delhi (n = 25), followed by authors from NIHMANS, Bangalore (n = 23), and KGMU, Lucknow (n = 21). Authors from AIIMS, New Delhi, collaborated most frequently with authors from PGIMER, Chandigarh (n = 25), followed by authors from NIMHANS, Bangalore (n = 11), and KGMU, Lucknow (n = 8). Authors from JSSMCH, Mysore, have collaborated with authors from NIHMANS, Bangalore (n = 43), KGMU, Lucknow (n = 9), PGIMER, Chandigarh (n = 7), and AIIMS, New Delhi (n = 5). Authors from KGMU, Lucknow, had the strongest collaborative links (n = 22) with authors from NIMHANS, Bangalore, followed by PGIMER, Chandigarh (n = 21), JSSMCH, Mysore (n = 9), and AIIMS, New Delhi (n = 8).

TOP 25 MOST PRODUCTIVE AUTHORS

A total of 4,399 authors contributed to the IJP, with the top 25 authors contributing to 44.68% of all publications and 66.82% of total citations, highlighting a significant concentration of influential research. Six authors exceeded the average productivity (44.68) threshold, led by S. Grover (PGIMER-Chandigarh) with 148 papers and C. Andrade (NIMHANS-Bangalore) with 105. In terms of citation impact, 11 authors surpassed the group average (15.99 CPP and 1.41 RCI), notably, A. Tripathi (KGMU-Lucknow) (31.58 CPP and 2.78 RCI), G. Saha (Clinic Brain Neuropsychiatric Institute and Research Centre, Kolkata) (31.39 CPP AND 2.77 RCI), R. Gupta (AIIMS-Rishikesh) (31.0 CPP and 2.73 RCI), S. Gautam (Gautam Hospital and Research Centre) (30.41 CPP and 2.68 RCI), and J. Thirthali (NIMHANS) (26.03 CPP and 2.3 RCI) [Table 3].

Table 3.

Bibliometric profile of the top 25 most productive authors

Name of the Author Affiliation TP TC CPP RCI ICP %ICP TLS
Sandeep Grover PGIMER- Chandigarh 148 2301 15.55 1.37 3 2.03 641
Chittaranjan Andrade NIMHANS-Bangalore 105 1160 11.05 0.97 11 10.48 231
T. S. Sathyanarayana Rao JSSMCH, Mysore 94 1336 14.21 1.25 13 13.83 271
Ajit Avasthi PGIMER-Chandigarh 89 1877 21.09 1.86 2 2.25 514
Omprakash Singh Midnapore Medical College, WB 59 933 15.81 1.39 1 1.69 191
Siddharth Sarkar AIIMS-New Delhi 49 749 15.29 1.35 1 2.04 334
Vikas Menon JIPMER-Pondicherry 41 437 10.66 0.94 6 14.63 306
JagadishaThirthalli NIHMANS-Bangalore 38 989 26.03 2.30 4 10.53 240
N. Manjunatha NIHMANS-Bangalore 37 677 18.30 1.61 0 0.00 244
B. N. Gangadhar NIHMANS-Bangalore 36 113 3.14 0.28 2 5.56 190
Swapnajeet Sahoo PGIMER-Chandigarh 35 862 24.63 2.17 1 2.86 278
Debashish Basu PGIMER-Chandigarh 33 288 8.73 0.77 1 3.03 219
Samir K. Praharaj KMC- Manipal 32 129 4.03 0.36 3 9.38 189
Subho Chakrabarti PGIMER-Chandigarh 32 379 11.84 1.04 0 0.00 123
Abhishek Ghosh PGIMER-Chandigarh 31 201 6.48 0.57 3 9.68 166
Naresh Nebhinani AIIMS-Jodhpur 29 379 13.07 1.15 0 0.00 341
Pratima Murthy NIHMANS-Bangalore 28 148 5.29 0.47 4 14.29 85
Mathews Varghese NIHMANS-Bangalore 27 510 18.89 1.67 3 11.11 219
Shiv Gautam Gautam Hospital & Research Centre (GHRC), Jaipur 27 821 30.41 2.68 0 0.00 142
Adarsh Tripathi KGMU-Lucknow 26 821 31.58 2.78 1 3.85 278
Vivek Benegal NIHMANS-Bangalore 26 294 11.31 1.00 1 3.85 165
G. Venkatasubramanian NIHMANS-Bangalore 24 595 24.79 2.19 1 4.17 138
Ravi Gupta AIIMS-Rishikesh 24 744 31.00 2.73 0 0.00 196
Mahesh Gowda Spandana Health Care (SHC)-Bengaluru 24 393 16.38 1.44 0 0.00 103
Gautam Saha Clinic Brain Neuropsychiatric Institute and Research Centre, Kolkata 23 722 31.39 2.77 1 4.35 220
Total of top 25 authors 1117 17858 15.99 1.41 61 5.46 5753
Total output 2357 26726 11.34 1.00
Share of top 25 authors in total output 47.39 66.82

TP: Total publications; TC: Total citations; CPP: Citations per paper; RCI: Relative Citation Index; ICP: International Collaborative Papers; TLS: Total Link Strength

BROAD AND NARROW SUBFIELDS

An analysis of thematic focus in the IJP reveals an intense concentration on core psychiatric conditions [Supplementary Table 6]. The most extensively researched subfields are Depression, Anxiety and Anxiety Disorder, Schizophrenia, Psychosis, Bipolar Disorder, and Alcoholism and Alcohol Consumption.

Supplementary Table 6.

List of broad and narrow subfields where major research is published in IJP, 2009-2024

Type of Disorder or Disease Period Block

2009-16 2017-24 2009-24
Depression (including Major Depression) 251 451 702
Depression 216 449 665
Major Depression 64 74 138
Psychosis Disorders 239 351 580
Psychosis 82 177 259
Schizophrenia 179 243 422
Schizophreniform Disorders 4 4 8
Paranoid schizophrenia 14 4 22
Schizoaffective disorder 11 13 24
Delusional disorder 7 10 17
Mental Health 117 332 449
Anxiety Disorders 211 606 817
Anxiety 41 309
Anxiety Disorder 59 155
Generalized Anxiety Disorders 18 20 38
Panic Disorders 16 21 37
Agrophobia 5 12 17
Separate Anxiety Disorders 2 3 5
Social Phobia 8 21 29
Substance Use and Disorder 108 182 290
Alcoholism and Alcohol Consumption 57 131 188
Drug Dependence 16 94 110
Substance Use and Disorder 9 67 76
Substance Abuse 33 36 69
Opiate 10 39 49
Opiate Addition 10 35 45
Tobacco Dependence 7 31 38
Cannabis 10 26 36
Mood Disorder (including Bipolar Disorder) 108 182 290
Mood Disorder 47 61 108
Bipolar Disorder 69 143 212
Suicide 80 132 212
Suicide 58 96 154
Suicide Attempt 47 41 88
Suicide Ideation 13 66 79
Suicide Behavior 15 43 58
Obsessive Compulsive Disorder 53 105 158
Sleep Disorders 44 108 152
Sleep Disorders 28 70 98
Insomnia 18 46 64
Stress 51 142 193
Stress 12 47 59
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder 18 47 65
Mental Stress 5 25 30
Emotional Stress 8 20 28
Psychological Stress 0 34 34
Distress Syndrome 25 63 88
Personality Disorder 22 60 82
Behavior Disorder 10 46 56
Neurodevelopment Disorders 39 117 156
Attention Deficit Disorder 22 45 67
Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder 4 24 28
Autism Spectrum Disorders 16 53 69
Learning Disorders 8 15 23
Gilles De La Tourette Syndrome 4 6 10
Neurological Diseases 23 21 44
Alzheimer Disease 17 11 28
Parkinson Disease 8 12 20
Neurocognitive Disease 43 75 118
Dementia 32 42 74
Delirium 13 42 55
Seizure Disorders 36 70 106
Epilepsy 19 20 39
Seizure 18 56 74
Neurological Condition 7 15 22
Stroke 6 3 9
Traumatic Brain Injury 1 9 10
Multiple Sclerosis 0 3 3
Somatoform Disorders 10 27 37
Conversion Disorders 5 4 9
Body Dimorphic Disorders 5 23 28

SIGNIFICANT KEYWORDS

Figure 1 illustrates the intellectual landscape of the journal through a VOSviewer keyword co-occurrence analysis, which groups 100 significant keywords [Supplementary Table 7] into four distinct thematic clusters with a TLS of 23,509. The largest group, Cluster 1 (Red), centers on psychological wellbeing and social determinants; it is anchored by dominant terms such as “Mental Disease” (632 occurrences), “Anxiety”, “Suicide”, “Social Support”, and “Stress”. Cluster 2 (Green) represents the clinical and pharmacological research front, focusing on severe psychiatric illnesses and interventions. Key terms include “Psychosis” and “Bipolar Disorder,” alongside frequent references to pharmacotherapies like “Olanzapine,” “Risperidone,” and “Electroconvulsive therapy,” highlighting a deep integration between psychopathology and medical treatment.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Most significant co-occurrence keyword network

Supplementary Table 7.

Top 100 most significant keywords

Keyword Occurrences Cluster Links Total Link Strength
Mental Disease 632 1 99 2686
Mental Health 449 1 97 1549
Anxiety 309 1 97 1720
Anxiety Disorder 155 3 94 966
Psychiatry 263 1 90 830
Psychosis 256 2 97 1579
Bipolar Disorder 209 2 98 1321
Psychotherapy 174 1 96 969
Obsessive Compulsive Disorder 158 3 93 958
Olanzapine 154 2 92 1079
Suicide 143 1 90 647
Coronavirus Disease 2019 138 1 82 479
Major Depression 138 3 89 699
Cognition 137 1 95 734
Electroconvulsive Therapy 135 2 90 744
Risperidone 129 2 93 920
Mental Health Care 127 1 74 357
Drug Dependence 110 1 88 566
Cognitive Defect 108 4 91 648
Fluoxetine 107 2 90 844
Mood Disorder 106 3 91 628
Education 102 1 85 383
Drug Withdrawal 101 2 67 446
Psychoeducation 101 1 93 691
Escitalopram 100 2 92 744
Neuroleptic Agent 98 2 86 642
Sleep Disorder 98 2 92 642
Antidepressant Agent 93 2 91 703
Clozapine 90 2 88 681
Distress Syndrome 88 1 81 419
Haloperidol 88 2 89 727
Suicide Attempt 88 1 87 434
Social Status 86 1 91 370
Alcohol Consumption 83 1 78 332
Clonazepam 82 2 94 609
Sertraline 82 2 92 665
Dsm-5 81 1 95 473
Social Support 81 1 82 397
Valproic Acid 81 2 90 639
Lorazepam 77 2 90 644
Suicidal Ideation 77 1 88 478
Aripiprazole 76 2 89 685
Substance Use 76 1 77 329
Dementia 74 4 80 351
Seizure 74 2 86 469
Autism 69 3 85 432
Substance Abuse 69 1 82 356
Emotion 68 1 75 278
Attention Deficit Disorder 67 3 86 366
Benzodiazepine 65 2 85 445
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder 65 1 87 478
Disability 62 3 68 271
Headache 61 3 84 368
Hypertension 61 4 79 345
Psychotropic Agent 60 2 83 449
Social Psychology 60 1 86 303
Yoga 60 1 65 204
Fatigue 59 1 86 390
Stress 59 1 74 217
Lithium 57 2 78 448
Remission 57 2 75 299
Sexual Dysfunction 57 1 76 275
Behavior Disorder 56 3 80 301
Suicidal Behavior 56 1 80 312
Delirium 55 2 84 386
Addiction 54 1 64 195
Aggression 54 2 80 322
Sexual Behavior 54 1 76 250
Diabetes Mellitus 51 4 74 293
Beck Depression Inventory 48 1 73 251
Mental Deficiency 48 3 67 207
Hallucination 45 2 69 255
Opiate Addiction 45 1 57 172
Auditory Hallucination 44 2 70 278
Fear 42 2 59 177
Intellectual Impairment 41 3 66 214
Epilepsy 39 3 77 240
Buprenorphine 35 1 55 132
Physiological Stress 34 1 65 192
Sleep Quality 33 1 73 190
Erectile Dysfunction 31 1 69 162
Mood Stabilizer 31 2 62 275
Neurosis 31 1 65 195
Eating Disorder 30 3 69 187
Mental Stress 30 1 62 179
Alzheimer Disease 28 4 59 144
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 28 3 28 214
Emotional Stress 28 1 61 159
Catatonia 27 2 63 195
Schizoaffective Psychosis 24 2 70 201
Dysthymia 23 3 55 138
Learning Disorder 23 3 40 114
Paranoid Schizophrenia 22 2 42 93
Persecutory Delusion 22 2 47 136
Agoraphobia 17 3 60 127
Oppositional Defiant Disorder 13 3 56 103
Substance Use Disorders 13 1 19 44
Anhedonia 11 1 43 61
Gilles De La Tourette Syndrome 10 2 40 68
Mixed Dementia 9 4 34 56

The remaining clusters address specialized and intersectional domains. Cluster 3 (Blue) focuses on internalizing and neuro-developmental disorders, linking emotional and cognitive health through terms like “Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder,” “Major Depression,” “Autism,” and “Attention Deficit Disorder.” Cluster 4 (Yellow), the smallest group, underscores the multidisciplinary intersection of psychiatry, neurology, and internal medicine. It groups neurodegenerative and physical comorbidities such as “Cognitive Deficits,” “Dementia,” “Hypertension,” and “Diabetes.”

CITATIONS BY INDIAN AND FOREIGN SCHOLARS

An analysis of 21,954 citations (out of a total 26,726) received by IJP publications between 2009 and 2024 reveals that authors from India remain the primary citing nation (6,552 citations), followed by authors from the United States of America (4,295), the United Kingdom (1,791), and China (1,507). At the same time, domestic citation is driven by apex institutions like NIMHANS, Bangalore and PGIMER, Chandigarh. However, the papers of IJP are also cited by authors from King’s College London, Harvard Medical School, and the University of Toronto. Furthermore, it is evident that, in addition to the papers of IJP being cited in journals published in India, IJP publications are also frequently cited in international journals, such as the Asian Journal of Psychiatry, Frontiers in Psychiatry, and PLoS One [Supplementary Table 8].

Supplementary Table 8.

Leading citing authors

Country Foreign countries
India (6552) US (4295), UK (1791), China (1507), Australia (1100), Canada (1023), Italy (830), Iran (792), Germany (682), Turkey (658), Spain (596), Brazil (521), Netherlands (385), Poland (365), South Africa (362), Saudi Arabia (356), South Korea (354), France (348)

Indian authors (citations) Foreign Authors (Citations)

S. Grover (208 citations), V. Menon (103), C. Andrade (100), S. B. Math (98), J. Thirthalli (97), N. Manjunatha (96), S.K. Kar (95), C.N. Kumar (94), A. Avasthi (94), S. Sarkar (90), B. N. Gangadhar (78) and S. Sahoo (66) S. M.Y Arafat (Bangladesh) (42 citations), V.Pakh (USA) (38). M. Pompili (Italy) (31), V.Ventriglio (Italy) (29), S.Hallit (Lebanon) (29), G.Serafini (Italy) (26), R.S.McIntyre (Canada) (26), A.Nadkarni (UK) (25), E.A. Storch (USA) (24) and D.J. Stein (S.Africa) (23)

Indian Organizations (Citations) Foreign Organizations (Citations)

NIMHANS-Bangalore (1095), PGIMER-Chandigarh (414), AIIMS-New Delhi (413), MAHE-Manipal (206), KGMU-Lucknow (204), MHFW-New Delhi (169), JIPMER-Pondicherry (168), KMC-Manipal (137), Christ University-Bangalore (126), JSSMCH-Mysore (120), SJNAHS-Bangalore (113), AIIMS-Jodhpur (114), CMC-Vellore (106, ICMR-New Delhi (104) and JSSAHER-Bangalore (102) Kings College London, UK (291 Citations), Harvard Medical School, USA) (273), University of Toronto, Canada (251), University of Melbourne (220), Centro de InvestgacionBiomedica En Red de Sae (143) University College London UK (140), Inserm (133), Universidade de São Paulo (133), Monash University (126) Tehran University of Medical Sciences (120), SapienzaUniversità di Roma (116), UNSW Sydney (114), Massachusetts General Hospital (112), Université McGill (109).

Indian Journals Foreign Journals

Indian Journal of Psychiatry (672), Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine (399), Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry (183), Journal of Indian Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (83), Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice (66), Indian Journal of Medical Research (45), Indian Journal of Community Medicine (43), Medical Journal of Dr D Y PatilVidyapeeth (31), Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology (28), Annals of Neurosciences (22), Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine (21), Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine (21), Neurology India (20) Indian Journal of Medical Ethics (20) Medical Journal Armed Forces India (19), Indian Pediatrics (19). Asian Journal of Psychiatry (346), Frontiers in Psychiatry (339), Plos One (266), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (254), BMC Psychiatry (206), Journal of Affective Disorders (180), Frontiers in Psychology (142) Psychiatry Research (140), Scientific Reports (117), Frontiers in Public Health (117), BMJ Open (113) BMC Public Health (112) and International Journal of Social Psychiatry (100)

High-cited papers (HCPs)

The analysis of the top 30 HCPs published between 2009 and 2024 highlights the disproportionate impact of a small fraction of research on the journal’s overall visibility. These 30 papers, representing only 1.27% of the total output, accumulated 5,029 citations, accounting for nearly 19% of the journal’s total citation count. These influential papers are is defined by high collaboration rates, with 27 papers involving multi-institutional partnerships. Authors from NIMHANS, Bangalore, emerged as the leading contributors with six papers, followed by authors from PGIMER, Chandigarh, who contributed to four of the high-cited papers. Among individual authors, S. Grover and A. Avasthi contributed to four of these papers, followed by R Chadda (3 papers), T S S Rao (3 papers), S. Sahoo (3 papers), S. Gautam (2 papers), C Andrade (2 papers), and V. Vahia (2 papers) [Supplementary Table 9].

Supplementary Table 9.

List of Top 30 highly cited papers

Name of authors Title Source Citations
Chadda, R.K., Deb, K.S. Indian family systems, collectivistic society and psychotherapy Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2013, 55 (SPEC. SUPPL.), pp. S299–S309 425
Vahia, V.N. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 5: A quick glance Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2013, 55 (3), pp. 220–223 354
Murthy, R.S. National mental health survey of India 2015-2016 Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2017. 59(1), pp. 21–26 294
Dalal, P.K., Agarwal, M. Postmenopausal syndrome Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2015, 57, pp. 222–232 263
Grover, S., Sahoo, S et al Psychological impact of COVID-19 lockdown: An online survey from India Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2020, 62(4), pp. 354–362 252
Gupta, R., Grover, S et al Changes in sleep pattern and sleep quality during COVID-19 lockdown Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2020, 62(4), pp. 370–378 240
Rao, T.S.S., Andrade, C. The MMR vaccine and autism: Sensation, refutation, retraction, and fraud Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2011, 53(2), pp. 95–96 183
Vijayakumar, L. Suicide in women Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2015, 57, pp. 233–238 180
Mohandas, E., Rajmohan, V., Raghunath, B. Neurobiology of Alzheimer′s disease Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2009, 51(1), pp. 55–61 179
Goel, D., Subramanyam, A., Kamath, R. A study on the prevalence of internet addiction and its association with psychopathology in Indian adolescents Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2013, 55(2), pp. 140–143 170
Gautam, S., Jain, A. et al Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of Depression Indian Journal of Psychiatry,59(5), pp. S34–S50 169
Memon, A.M., Sharma, S.G. et al. The role of online social networking on deliberate self-harm and suicidality in adolescents: A systematized review of literature Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2018, 60(4), pp. 384–392 165
Radhakrishnan, R., Andrade, C Suicide: An Indian perspective Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2012, 54(4), pp. 304–319 165
Kalra, G., Bhugra, D. Sexual violence against women: Understanding cross-cultural intersections Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2013, 55(3), pp. 244–249 153
Gautam, M., Agrawal, M. et al Role of antioxidants in generalised anxiety disorder and depression Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2012, 54(3), pp. 244–247 150
Chadda, R.K. Caring for the family caregivers of persons with mental illness Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2014, 56(3), pp. 221–227 147
Avasthi, A. Preserve and strengthen family to promote mental health Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2010, 52(2), pp. 113–126 122
Garg, K., Kumar, C.N., Chandra, P.S. Number of psychiatrists in India: Baby steps forward, but a long way to go Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2019, 61(1), pp. 104–10 118
Malhotra, S., Shah, R. Women and mental health in India: An overview Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 2015, 57, pp. 205–211 117
Chatterjee, S.S., Bhattacharyya, R. et al. Attitude, practice, behavior, and mental health impact of COVID-19 on doctors Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2020, 62(3), pp. 257–265 115
Rai, S., Pathak, A., Sharma, I. Postpartum psychiatric disorders: Early diagnosis and management Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2015, 57, pp. 216–221 115
Srikala, B., Kishore Kumar, K.V. Empowering adolescents with life skills education in schools-School mental health program: Does it work Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2010, 52(4), pp. 344–34 114
Hezel, D., Simpson, H. Exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A review and new directions Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2019, 61(7), pp. S85–S92 109
Sabry, W.M., Vohra, A. Role of Islam in the management of Psychiatric disorders Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2013, 55(SPEC. SUPPL.), pp. S205–S214 108
Kishore, J., Gupta, A et al. Myths, beliefs and perceptions about mental disorders and health-seeking behavior in Delhi, India Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2011, 53(4), pp. 324–329 108
Satyanarayana, V.A., Lukose, A., Srinivasan, K Maternal mental health in pregnancy and child behavior Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2011, 53(4), pp. 351–361 105
Grover, S., Sahoo, S. et al. Psychological problems and burnout among medical professionals of a tertiary care hospital of North India: A cross-sectional study Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2018, 60(2), pp. 175–188 104
Pompili, M., Shrivastava, A et al. Bereavement after the suicide of a significant other Indian Journal of Psychiatry,2013, 55(3), pp. 256–26 104
Lahariya, C., Singhal, S. et al Pathway of care among psychiatric patients attending a mental health institution in central India Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 2010, 52(4), pp. 333–338 102
Gupta, S., Kulhara, P. What is schizophrenia: A neurodevelopmental or neurodegenerative disorder or a combination of both A critical analysis Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 2010, 52(1), pp. 21–27 100

DISCUSSION

The bibliometric assessment of the IJP from 2009 to 2024 reveals that the journal is in a phase of significant robust growth, mirroring the broader positive trends observed in Indian medical publishing. Between 2009 and 2024, the journal’s Impact Factor increased eightfold, rising from 0.384 in 2010 to a peak of 3.1 in 2022, while the total publication output grew at an annual average rate of 9.16%. The rise in these metrics underscores a notable improvement in the journal’s academic reputation, particularly since 2020, thereby solidifying its standing in psychiatric research. This upward trajectory aligns with similar trends noted for other Indian journals.[8,9,10]

Over the years, the journal has predominantly published papers from Indian authors. However, the number of papers from authors from other countries has almost doubled in recent years (2017–2024) compared to earlier years (2009–2016). A lower number of publications in the earlier years could be attributed to the lower IF of the journal, compared to the impact factor in the recent years, especially when the IF peaked in the year 2022. Additionally, the increase in papers from authors from other countries may also be related to improvements in CiteScore and SJR, as well as the expansion of the Indian diaspora in various countries.

However, the publication of papers with authors from 74 more countries reflects that the journal is more widely accepted internationally and has an international reputation.

Over the years, the articles published in IJP have been cited widely with an average CPP of 11.33, suggesting that every paper published in IJP is cited at least 11 times. Another important finding is that 81.3% of the papers published in the journal are cited at least once. These findings again reflect the quality of publications in the journal. Although the papers published in the earlier period (2009–2016) achieved a higher CPP of 17.22 compared to 7.93 for papers published in the later period (2017–2024), this decline could be attributed to the lag time required for recent publications to accrue citations despite increased productivity.

However, an important thing to note is that the journal’s IF, Cite Score, and SJR have been driven by a small number of publications (about 4.3%) that have been cited more than 50 times. This suggests that there is still scope for improvement in the selection of articles for publication. When one examines the HCPs, it is apparent that articles focusing on COVID-related research were more often cited. This pattern may reflect the general trend seen for higher citations of papers related to COVID-19 published during the initial part of the pandemic. Overall, the IJP relies on a small fraction of high-quality contributions to significantly elevate its overall standing in the global scholarly community.

In terms of publication types, IJP is a journal with a primary focus on publishing original research articles, followed by Letters to the Editor and review articles. In terms of citations, the original research and reviews remain the core drivers of the journal’s influence, collectively accounting for nearly 88% of all citations. These findings suggest that the original research published in the journal is widely read and cited. Another important finding that is evident is that conference papers, that is, award papers, are more often cited than other types of papers. This reflects the quality of the data-based award papers and orations, which are of a higher quality compared to other kinds of publications.

A core finding of this study is the definitive shift from single-author contributions to multiauthor, collaborative research. This also reflects the evolution of psychiatric research toward greater teamwork, institutional cooperation, and interdisciplinary engagement. Across the 16 years, the authorship pattern reveals a progressive transformation in the research culture of the IJP from individual-driven studies to collaborative, team-oriented research endeavours. This evolution reflects the broader global trend in scientific publishing, where interdisciplinary research teams and networked collaborations contribute to higher productivity, diversified expertise, and greater research impact.

In terms of field of research, the higher frequency of keywords like depression, anxiety and anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, psychosis, bipolar disorder, and alcoholism and alcohol consumption reflect the commonly researched areas in the country.

In terms of institutional distribution of publications, the current bibliometric analysis reveals that the premier institutes in the country contribute disproportionately to the journal’s publications, which are cited more frequently. These findings can be interpreted in different ways. First, this may be a reflection of the research culture in the premier institutes. Additionally, this finding reflects higher access to funding and the ability to carry out better-quality research. However, this finding also reflects a differential research culture and infrastructure in the majority of institutes in the country, suggesting a need to improve these aspects.

The findings of the present analysis must be interpreted in the light of its limitations. First, this analysis was based on the SCOPUS database, which provides a more conservative estimate of the citations compared to the Google Scholar database. The findings of disproportionate representation of research from certain institutes and researchers do not necessarily reflect the overall research output from the country. Many authors with similar or better-quality research publish their papers in various international journals with more favorable indexing parameters. The analysis of the data was limited to 16 years only. Accordingly, the findings do not accurately reflect the journal’s overall publication pattern since its inception. The reduction in the CPP for recent years reflects a shorter time frame for these citations to accrue, rather than the quality of the research. We could not find bibliometric analysis for a psychiatric journal. Hence, we could not compare the findings of the present study with the existing data for a psychiatric journal.

CONCLUSION

The bibliometric analysis of the IJP (2009–2024) highlights a transformative era characterized by an eightfold increase in Impact Factor and a consistent rise in scholarly output. The journal has evolved into a hub for collaborative research, where domestic apex institutions, such as NIMHANS and PGIMER, drive the publication volume, while international partnerships significantly enhance the citation impact. Thematically, the publication landscape remains anchored in core clinical areas like depression and schizophrenia yet displays remarkable agility in addressing emerging challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite a skewed citation distribution where a small elite cohort of papers garners the majority of attention, the journal’s overall metrics reflect a strengthening academic reputation and global reach. Future growth will likely depend on leveraging these strengths to internationalize authorship further and broaden the global dissemination of Indian psychiatric research.

Use of AI

The Grammarly software was used for language editing. No AI tool was used to write the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Figure 1

Network Collaboration map of top 13 most collaborative countries

IJPsy-68-510_Suppl1.tif (262.5KB, tif)

Funding Statement

Nil.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Vachha MR. Editorial: Psychiatry and its journals. Indian J Psychiatry. 1964;6:1. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rao TSS. An opportunity and a beginning! Indian J Psychiatry. 2007;49:1–2. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.31510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rao TS, Swaminath G, Rao GP. Indian Psychiatry and Indian Journal of Psychiatry-A journey. Indian J Psychiatry. 2010;52((Suppl 1)):S1–6. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.69194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ranjan CK. Bibliometric indices of scientific journals: Time to overcome the obsession and think beyond the impact factor. Med J Armed Forces India. 2017;73:175–7. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Casadevall A, Clark LF, Fang FC. The changing roles of scientific journals. MBio. 2024;15:e02515–24. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02515-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2021;133:285–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Arik E. A bibliometric analysis of a national Journal: The case of the Turkish Journal of Psychology. J Sci Res. 2013;2:173–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vaishya R, Gupta BM, Vaish A, Kambhampati SSB, Poduval M, Shekhawat S, et al. Indian orthopaedics research landscape: A bibliometric analysis of the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics (2007-2024) Indian J Orthop. 2025;60:343–54. doi: 10.1007/s43465-025-01624-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bhutani G, Kaushal J, Godara S. Bibliometric analysis of Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;17:871–5. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.117251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Srivastava R, Srivastava S. Bibliometric analysis of Indian Journal of Palliative Care from 1995 to 2022 using the VOSviewer and Bibliometrix software. Indian J Palliat Care. 2022;28:338–53. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_30_2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1

Network Collaboration map of top 13 most collaborative countries

IJPsy-68-510_Suppl1.tif (262.5KB, tif)

Articles from Indian Journal of Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES