Impact statement
Antibiotic resistance in plant pathogens threatens sustainable crop protection, and yet, its molecular basis remains incompletely understood. We report that streptomycin resistance in Clavibacter michiganensis strain TX‐0702 is mediated by a plasmid‐borne aminoglycoside phosphotransferase, APH(3), encoded on an uncharacterized plasmid, pCM3. Functional and biochemical analyses demonstrate that APH(3) inactivates streptomycin through phosphorylation, establishing a phosphorylation‐driven resistance mechanism in Gram‐positive plant pathogens. Sequence analyses reveal that pCM3 carries mobile genetic elements, suggesting environmental dissemination of resistance genes in plant‐associated microbes. These findings expand understanding of phytopathogen antibiotic resistance and plant microbiomes as potential resistance gene sources for agricultural, food, and human health safety.
Tomato bacterial canker, caused by Clavibacter michiganensis, is a destructive vascular disease that threatens global tomato production and seed trade.The pathogen is primarily transmitted through contaminated seeds, enabling long‐distance dissemination and persistent field outbreaks 1 . In the absence of commercially available resistant cultivars, disease management relies largely on quarantine measures, seed treatments, and chemical control strategies 2 . Among these, antibiotic‐based treatments remain effective once infection is established. However, the frequent application of antibiotics has raised concerns about the emergence and spread of resistant strains 3 .
Streptomycin, a prominent aminoglycoside antibiotic, has been widely used in the management of plant disease and the treatment of human diseases, including tuberculosis. It inhibits bacterial growth by impeding protein synthesis through its interaction with the ribosome 4 . Decades of research have elucidated that bacterial resistance to streptomycin is primarily achieved via two mechanisms. The first involves mutations in ribosomal components, particularly in the rpsL or 16S rRNA gene (rrs), which disrupt antibiotic binding to the ribosome and often confer stable, high‐level resistance in bacteria 5 . Additionally, mutations occurring in ribosomal RNA modification genes, such as gidB, have been reported to confer low‐level resistance in several bacterial species 6 . A second well‐established resistance strategy involves enzymatic modification of streptomycin, resulting in antibiotic inactivation 7 . Aminoglycoside‐modifying enzymes, including phosphotransferases and adenylyltransferases, function as self‐defense mechanisms in the producing organisms, and catalyze the transfer of a phosphate group to specific hydroxyl moieties on the streptomycin molecule, thereby inactivating it. Related resistance genes, such as strAB and aadA, are frequently found in mobile genetic elements and can spread across bacterial populations through horizontal gene transfer (HGT) 8 , 9 .
Recent investigations have revealed that C. michiganensis shows significant streptomycin resistance. Field isolates carrying mutations at codon 43 of the rpsL gene display high levels of resistance 10 . A previous study of our group demonstrated that exposure of C. michiganensis strains to elevated streptomycin concentrations successfully induced high‐level resistance. This induced resistance was also attributed to mutations at codon 43 of the rpsL gene 11 . Overexpression of the mutated rpsL gene in streptomycin‐sensitive strains resulted in intermediate‐level resistance 11 . In contrast, wild‐type resistant strains, such as TX‐0702, which were isolated from diseased tomato fields, show resistance that is not mediated by mutations in the rpsL, gidB, rrs, or strB genes.
The present study aimed to determine the genetic basis of the unusually high‐level streptomycin resistance observed in the field‐derived C. michiganensis strain TX‐0702. Random transposon mutagenesis generated 30 streptomycin‐sensitive mutants, among which 15 showed markedly reduced resistance based on minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) assays (≤16 μg/ml) and were selected for the subsequent identification of transposon insertion sites. The remaining mutants retained wild‐type resistance levels (Table S1).
Inverse PCR, followed by sequencing, was performed on the 18 selected strains to determine the genetic lesion responsible for the loss of streptomycin resistance in these mutants. Thirteen distinct transposon insertion sites were identified. Several insertions mapped to annotated chromosomal loci in the TX‐0702 genome; however, subsequent functional analyses did not support a role for these genes in streptomycin resistance (Table S2). In contrast, seven insertion sequences could not be assigned to the reference genome or public databases. Assembly of overlapping fragments from these unmapped insertions yielded a contiguous 2739 bp sequence containing a 756 bp open reading frame encoding an aminoglycoside 3′ phosphotransferase, hereafter designated aph(3). Third‐generation de novo genome sequencing was performed to localize the aph(3) in C. michiganensis TX‐0702. The assembly revealed a previously uncharacterized 51,235 bp plasmid, designated pCM3, in addition to the known plasmids pCM1 and pCM2. The Suk sequence, which was identified by inverse PCR and contains aph(3), was localized to pCM3 (Figure 1A). A comparative analysis revealed that pCM3 shows 90.52% nucleotide identity (with 67% coverage) to plasmid D26b from Curtobacterium sp. MCBD17_026 (CP126283.1), while an ~6.6 kb region displayed near‐identical similarity to the C. michiganensis genome, suggesting a mosaic origin (Figure S1). Annotation of pCM3 identified multiple mobility‐associated genes, indicating that aph(3) is carried on a potentially mobilizable plasmid.
Figure 1.

Identification of aph(3) and its role in streptomycin resistance in Clavibacter michiganensis. (A) Physical map of the aph(3) gene derived from de novo sequencing data, showcasing its genomic location, structural organization, and potential regulatory elements. (B) Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of streptomycin against plasmid‐cured strains of C. michiganensis, normalized to wild‐type TX‐0702. The TX110 lacks pCM3, TX010 lacks both pCM1 and pCM3, and TX000 lacks all three plasmids (pCM1, pCM2, and pCM3). Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3). (C) MICs of streptomycin against C. michiganensis strains with different levels of aph(3) expression, normalized to wild‐type TX‐0702. BT‐0505, streptomycin‐sensitive field strain. EV, empty vector control. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3). (D) Liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry (LC‐MS) analysis of streptomycin standard (20 μg/ml), showing a distinct retention time at ~2 min. The detected ions include the protonated molecular [M + H]+ at m/z 582.27 and the doubly charged ion [M + 2H]2+ at m/z 291.64. (E) Extracted ion chromatogram (EIC) of APH(3)‐treated samples scanned at m/z 582.27, showing complete loss of native streptomycin ions under this specific detection window. (F) LC‐MS detection of phosphorylated streptomycin in APH(3)‐treated samples. Peaks at m/z 662.24 ([M + H]+) and 331.62 ([M + H]2+) correspond to the monophosphorylated product. FC, fold change.
To validate the role of aph(3) and the plasmid pCM3 in streptomycin resistance, a series of plasmid‐cured C. michiganensis TX‐0702 derivatives were analyzed. The strain TX110 lacked pCM3, TX010 lacked both pCM1 and pCM3, and TX000 lacked of all three plasmids (pCM1, pCM2, and pCM3). MIC assays revealed that, while the MIC of the wild‐type TX‐0702 strain was 128 μg/ml, the MIC of all pCM3‐deficient strains was significantly reduced to 4 μg/ml (fold change [FC] = 0.03), indicating that pCM3 is essential for resistance (Figure 1B). This finding was corroborated by disc diffusion assays, in which the wild TX‐0702 strain was the only one to show no inhibition zone upon exposure to 1 mg/ml streptomycin, whereas the plasmid‐cured strains formed clear inhibition zones (~1.5 cm), indicating increased sensitivity (Figure S2A).
To further confirm the contribution of aph(3), a gene knockout mutant Δaph(3) was generated and its resistance phenotype was assessed alongside complemented Δaph(3)::aph(3) and overexpression strains TX‐0702 + aph(3) and BT‐0505 + aph(3). qPCR analysis confirmed differential aph(3) expression across these strains (Figure S2B). As shown in Figure 1C, Δaph(3) showed a markedly reduced MIC of 4 μg/ml (FC = 0.03), similar to the sensitive field strain C. michiganensis BT‐0505. Complementation partially restored resistance, with Δaph(3)::aph(3) reaching an MIC of 32 μg/ml (FC = 0.25), while overexpression of aph(3) in TX‐0702 further elevated the MIC to 256 μg/ml (FC = 2.00). The introduction of aph(3) into the sensitive strain BT‐0505 led to a significant increase in its streptomycin resistance level, confirming the functional contribution of aph(3). Filter disc assays demonstrated that streptomycin pretreated with APH(3) lost its inhibitory activity against all C. michiganensis strains, indicating that APH(3) enzymatically inactivates the antibiotic. In contrast, the streptomycin‐sensitive strains Δaph(3) and BT‐0505 showed clear inhibition zones (~2.0 ± 0.1 cm) when treated with unmodified streptomycin, while no inhibition was observed upon exposure to phosphorylated streptomycin (Figure S2C).
In order to characterize the enzymatic modification of streptomycin by APH(3) at the molecular level, liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry (LC‐MS) analysis was performed. Purified recombinant APH(3) was incubated with streptomycin, followed by LC‐MS analysis. The standard streptomycin sample produced a signal, symmetrical LC‐MS peak at around 2 min. The [M + H]+ ion appeared at m/z of 582.27, consistent with its molecular weight (581.57), along with a doubly charged ion at m/z 291.64 (Figure 1D). However, this peak at m/z 582.27 was absent in the APH(3)‐treated samples (Figure 1E). In contrast, the result in Figure 1F revealed a new ion peak at m/z 662.24, which is consistent with the predicted mass of monophosphorylated streptomycin (C21H40N7O15P), accompanied by a doubly charged ion at m/z 331.62 (Figure 1F). In the distilled water‐treated control, only native streptomycin ions were observed at m/z 582.27 and 291.64, with a retention time of ~2 min (Figure S3A). No phosphorylated streptomycin peaks were detected in this negative control (Figure S3B).
In this study, we elucidated a novel mechanism of streptomycin resistance in C. michiganensis through transposon insertion mutagenesis and inverse PCR. Previous approaches, including resequencing, had failed to identify streptomycin resistance determinants in strain TX‐0702, highlighting the need for alternative strategies 11 , 12 . By constructing a library of streptomycin‐sensitive mutants using the Gram‐positive transposon plasmid pMarA and adopting an enzyme digestion‐based inverse PCR strategy, we successfully identified insertion sites in most mutants, overcoming the limitations imposed by the high G + C content of the genome.
Functional analysis demonstrated that disrupting a plasmid‐encoded aminoglycoside phosphotransferase gene, aph(3), eliminated streptomycin resistance. Although complementation and heterologous expression partially restored the resistant phenotype, the resistance levels remained lower than those observed in the wild‐type strain. Quantitative PCR revealed that this incomplete restoration was associated with aph(3) expression and the copy number of the plasmid pCM3, which harbors aph(3) (Figures S2B and S4). These findings indicate that the number of copies of both the plasmid and the gene critically influences aph(3) expression and streptomycin resistance. This is consistent with previous reports that the number of plasmid copies is tightly regulated to balance stability and host fitness 13 .
Mechanistically, this work provides the first evidence that streptomycin resistance in a plant‐pathogenic Gram‐positive bacterium is mediated by an APH(3)‐dependent phosphorylation pathway. Members of the APH(3) family catalyze the transfer of the γ‐phosphate from ATP to aminoglycoside antibiotics, resulting in antibiotic inactivation 14 . Phosphorylation of streptomycin produces streptomycin‐3′‐phosphate, with mono‐ and diphosphorylated forms predicted based on molecular weight calculations. This study expands our understanding of the strategies used by plant‐pathogenic bacteria to resist aminoglycoside antibiotics and highlights their relevance to recognized resistance mechanisms in clinical and environmental microbes.
Given the central role of pCM3 in mediating streptomycin resistance, understanding its origin and mobility is critical. De novo sequencing revealed that aph(3) is located on the previously uncharacterized plasmid, pCM3, which shares approximately 67% sequence homology with plasmids from Curtobacterium species, excluding the resistance gene itself. Annotation of pCM3 identified mobile genetic elements, including a MobC‐like relaxase, which is consistent with the potential for plasmid mobilization via HGT. Additionally, a 6.6 kb region containing genes encoding transposases, recombinase family proteins, and ATP‐binding proteins showed variable genomic localization across C. michiganensis strains, indicating extensive genetic rearrangements (Figure S1). Similar patterns have been reported in related Clavibacter species 15 , suggesting that genetic rearrangements may facilitate plasmid stabilization within the host.
From a broader perspective, the presence of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in plant‐associated bacteria represents a growing concern for the One Health initiative. Although the dissemination of ARG has been extensively studied in soil, manure, and wastewater, relatively little attention has been paid to plant microbiomes 16 , 17 , 18 . Curtobacterium species, which commonly inhabit soil and plants and have occasionally been isolated from human clinical samples, may facilitate ARG exchange as environmental reservoirs 19 , 20 . The identification of the aph(3) gene on a plasmid in C. michiganensis underscores the potential for HGT to connect environmental, plant, and human‐associated microbial communities.
In conclusion, we identified a novel plasmid, designated pCM3, in C. michiganensis strain TX‐0702. This plasmid confers streptomycin resistance through an aph(3)‐encoded phosphorylation mechanism. Our findings demonstrate that the number of plasmid copies strongly influences resistance levels and suggest that pCM3 was likely acquired through HGT from environmental bacteria. This study provides new insights into aminoglycoside resistance in plant‐pathogenic bacteria, highlighting the potential role of agricultural pathogens as reservoirs and vectors of ARGs. This emphasizes the need for enhanced surveillance and prudent antibiotic use in crop production systems.
ETHICS STATEMENT
This study did not involve any human participant or animal subject.
Supporting information
Supporting‐information file 1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2022YFD1400905). We would like to thank Dr. Linlu Qi (College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University) for providing technical support on the LC‐MS analysis.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The complete genome assembly data of C. michiganensis strain TX‐0702 have been deposited in the GenBank with the accession number PRJNA1230600.
REFERENCES
- 1. Gleason ML. Survival and dissemination of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis in tomatoes. Phytopathology. 1991;81:1519–1523. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Fatmi M, Schaad NW. Survival of Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. michiganensis in infected tomato stems under natural field conditions in California, Ohio and Morocco. Plant Pathol. 2002;51:149–154. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hausbeck MK, Bell J, Medina‐Mora C, Podolsky R, Fulbright DW. Effect of bactericides on population sizes and spread of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis on tomatoes in the greenhouse and on disease development and crop yield in the field. Phytopathology. 2000;90:38–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Demirci H, Murphy F, Murphy E, Gregory ST, Dahlberg AE, Jogl G. A structural basis for streptomycin‐induced misreading of the genetic code. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Finken M, Kirschner P, Meier A, Wrede A, Böttger EC. Molecular basis of streptomycin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: alterations of the ribosomal protein S12 gene and point mutations within a functional 16S ribosomal RNA pseudoknot. Mol Microbiol. 1993;9:1239–1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Okamoto S, Tamaru A, Nakajima C, Nishimura K, Tanaka Y, Tokuyama S, et al. Loss of a conserved 7‐methylguanosine modification in 16S rRNA confers low‐level streptomycin resistance in bacteria. Mol Microbiol. 2007;63:1096–1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. de Lima Procópio RE, da Silva IR, Martins MK, de Azevedo JL, de Araújo JM. Antibiotics produced by Streptomyces . Braz J Infect Dis. 2012;16:466–471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Sundin GW, Bender CL. Dissemination of the strA‐strB streptomycin‐resistance genes among commensal and pathogenic bacteria from humans, animals, and plants. Mol Ecol. 1996;5:133–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. McGhee GC, Guasco J, Bellomo LM, Blumer‐Schuette SE, Shane WW, Irish‐Brown A, et al. Genetic analysis of streptomycin‐resistant (Sm(R)) strains of Erwinia amylovora suggests that dissemination of two genotypes is responsible for the current distribution of Sm(R) E. amylovora in Michigan. Phytopathology. 2011;101:182–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Valenzuela M, Méndez V, Montenegro I, Besoain X, Seeger M. Streptomycin resistance in Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis strains from Chile is related to an rpsL gene mutation. Plant Pathol. 2019;68:426–433. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Lyu Q, Bai K, Kan Y, Jiang N, Thapa SP, Coaker G, et al. Variation in streptomycin resistance mechanisms in Clavibacter michiganensis . Phytopathology. 2019;109:1849–1858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kirchner O, Gartemann KH, Zellermann EM, Eichenlaub R, Burger A. A highly efficient transposon mutagenesis system for the tomato pathogen Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis . Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2001;14:1312–1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Del Solar G, Espinosa M. Plasmid copy number control: an ever‐growing story. Mol Microbiol. 2000;37:492–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Siregar JJ, Miroshnikov K, Mobashery S. Purification, characterization, and investigation of the mechanism of aminoglycoside 3′‐phosphotransferase type Ia. Biochemistry. 1995;34:12681–12688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Hwang IS, Lee HM, Oh EJ, Lee S, Heu S, Oh CS. Plasmid composition and the chpG gene determine the virulence level of Clavibacter capsici natural isolates in pepper. Mol Plant Pathol. 2020;21:808–819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Feng Y, Lu X, Zhao J, Li H, Xu J, Li Z, et al. Regional antimicrobial resistance gene flow among the One Health sectors in China. Microbiome. 2025;13:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Rizzo L, Manaia C, Merlin C, Schwartz T, Dagot C, Ploy MC, et al. Urban wastewater treatment plants as hotspots for antibiotic resistant bacteria and genes spread into the environment: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2013;447:345–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Cheng D, Liu Y, Shehata E, Feng Y, Lin H, Xue J, et al. In‐feed antibiotic use changed the behaviors of oxytetracycline, sulfamerazine, and ciprofloxacin and related antibiotic resistance genes during swine manure composting. J Hazard Mater. 2021;402:123710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Funke G, Aravena‐Roman M, Frodl R. First description of Curtobacterium spp. isolated from human clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:1032–1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Tauch A, Krieft S, Kalinowski J, Pühler A. The 51,409‐bp R‐plasmid pTP10 from the multiresistant clinical isolate Corynebacterium striatum M82B is composed of DNA segments initially identified in soil bacteria and in plant, animal, and human pathogens. Mol Gen Genet. 2000;263:1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting‐information file 1.
Data Availability Statement
The complete genome assembly data of C. michiganensis strain TX‐0702 have been deposited in the GenBank with the accession number PRJNA1230600.
