Abstract
Background
Alström syndrome (AS) is a rare autosomal recessive ciliopathy caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in the ALMS1 gene. The condition is characterized by a spectrum of clinical manifestations, including cone-rod dystrophy, sensorineural hearing loss, metabolic disturbances, and progressive multiorgan involvement. Ciliopathies share considerable clinical overlap, and some cases present with features that resemble AS without meeting all diagnostic criteria. This study aims to identify the pathogenic variants in a Chinese patient with a ciliopathy resembling AS.
Case Presentation
We report a 27-year-old Chinese female with a body mass index (BMI) of 28.4 kg/m2. The patient initially presented with progressive hearing loss at age 2 years, followed by visual impairment beginning at age 8 years. At age 17 years, she developed progressive alopecia accompanied by scaly, patchy papules. By age 22 years, she was diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Laboratory investigations revealed dyslipidemia and hyperinsulinemia. Abdominal ultrasonography demonstrated hepatic steatosis and medullary sponge kidney, while pelvic ultrasound indicated polycystic ovarian morphology. Echocardiography revealed ventricular septal thickening. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) identified that our patient was a compound heterozygote for two novel variants in the ALMS1 gene, comprising c.12114 + 1G>T and c.1856_1860dup (p.Ser621Leufs*23). Both variants were classified as likely pathogenic in accordance with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines. Based on the clinical phenotype and molecular findings, a diagnosis of a ciliopathy resembling AS was made, although a definitive diagnosis of AS could not be confirmed due to incomplete ocular phenotyping. Disease management included metformin and pioglitazone for T2DM, continued use of hearing aids, and scheduled regular follow-up evaluations.
Conclusion
This report describes two novel ALMS1 variants, expanding the known mutational spectrum of the gene. Genetic testing plays a supportive role in diagnosis and is valuable for familial screening and counseling, although a definitive diagnosis of AS would require complete ophthalmic phenotyping and functional validation.
Keywords: Alström syndrome, case report, genetic counseling, genetic testing, precision diagnosis
1. Introduction
Ciliopathies are a group of genetically and phenotypically overlapping disorders caused by dysfunction of primary cilia (Focşa et al., 2021; Gerth-Kahlert and Koller, 2018). They share a broad spectrum of clinical features, often including retinal dystrophy, obesity, hearing loss, diabetes mellitus, renal abnormalities, and cognitive impairment (Focşa et al., 2021; Gerth-Kahlert and Koller, 2018). The considerable phenotypic overlap among different ciliopathies frequently leads to diagnostic challenges, especially when the ocular phenotype is incompletely characterized.
Alström syndrome (AS; OMIM #203800) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder first described by the Swedish physician Carl Henry Alström in 1959 (Alström et al., 1959). Its estimated prevalence ranges from 1 to 9 per million individuals, with no sex predilection, although the incidence is markedly higher among the offspring of consanguineous unions (Hearn, 2019; Choudhury et al., 2021). AS is characterized by progressive multisystem involvement, including neurosensory impairments such as cone-rod dystrophy and sensorineural hearing loss, as well as metabolic and endocrine abnormalities—most notably type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity, and short stature (Choudhury et al., 2021; Marshall et al., 2011). Additional complications frequently involve hepatic, renal, and pulmonary dysfunction, along with dilated cardiomyopathy (Choudhury et al., 2021; Marshall et al., 2011). Although clinical evaluation remains the essential first step in diagnosis, the progressive nature of multiorgan dysfunction and the variable expressivity observed even among affected family members pose considerable diagnostic challenges. Currently, in conjunction with clinical findings, the identification of biallelic pathogenic variants in the ALMS1 gene is a cornerstone of the diagnostic criteria for AS (Marshall et al., 2007a). This was firmly established in 2002, when Collin et al. (2002) first demonstrated that biallelic mutations in ALMS1 are causative of the disorder.
The ALMS1 gene, located on chromosome 2p13.1, spans 23 exons and encodes a 4,169-amino acid protein with a molecular weight of 461 kDa (Hearn et al., 2002). The ALMS1 protein is ubiquitously expressed and localizes to the centrosome and basal body of cilia, implicating it in a range of fundamental cellular processes, including ciliary function, intracellular trafficking, cell cycle regulation, differentiation, and metabolic homeostasis (Hearn, 2019; Hearn et al., 2005). Biallelic pathogenic variants—either homozygous or compound heterozygous—in the ALMS1 gene are responsible for AS. Pathogenic variants in ALMS1 are predominantly truncating mutations, notably nonsense and frameshift variants caused by single-nucleotide changes or small insertions/deletions (DeMaagd and Engber, 1989; Ozantürk et al., 2015). These mutations introduce a premature termination codon, consequently leading to the production of a truncated protein and triggering a nonsense-mediated decay (DeMaagd and Engber, 1989; Ozantürk et al., 2015). Genomic analyses have identified exons 8, 10, and 16 as major mutational hot spots (Marshall et al., 2007b; Hu et al., 2024). Beyond these common alterations, a limited number of non-canonical variants have been reported, including chromosomal translocation, insertions of AluYa5 repetitive elements, large deletions, and splice-site mutations (Hearn et al., 2002; Bond et al., 2005; Taşkesen et al., 2012; Marshall et al., 2015; Nikopoulos et al., 2016; Saadah et al., 2021).
In this report, we describe a 27-year-old female presenting with T2DM, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) with clinical features of hyperandrogenism (e.g., alopecia), sensorineural hearing loss, vision impairment, and fatty liver disease. To establish a definitive diagnosis, we performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) and conducted familial segregation analysis via Sanger sequencing. Our investigation revealed compound heterozygosity for two novel ALMS1 variants, suggesting a ciliopathy resembling AS. However, due to incomplete ocular phenotyping, a definitive diagnosis of AS cannot be confirmed. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges posed by overlapping ciliopathy phenotypes and the necessity of comprehensive ophthalmic assessment even when genetic findings are present.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Patient and clinical evaluations
We conducted comprehensive genetic and clinical assessments of the patient with AS and assessed the family history, focusing on consanguinity and preterm birth. The patient underwent a general clinical exam at the Department of Internal Medicine. The ophthalmological assessment included a comprehensive ophthalmic examination following standard clinical protocols, comprising non-contact tonometry (NCT), video nystagmography, color fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), static visual field testing, and visual evoked potential (VEP) assessment. Hearing tests included tympanometry and pure tone audiometry (Figure 1). Systemic evaluation involved serum testing for liver and renal function, electrolytes, lipid profile, blood glucose, C-peptide, and hormone level, in addition to abdominal ultrasonography, pelvic ultrasonography, and transthoracic echocardiography. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Chongqing Liangjiang New Area People’s Hospital (Approval No. 2025-193). Written informed consent was obtained from the proband and both parents prior to their participation.
FIGURE 1.
Audiometry of the patient. The pure tone audiogram indicates bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss, particularly in the high-frequency range. AC, air conduction; BC, bone conduction; PTA, pure tone average.
2.2. Gene detection and analysis
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples collected in EDTA tubes from the proband. WES was performed at the Chongqing Puroton Gene Medical Research Institute (Chongqing, 400712, China), and the resulting sequence reads were aligned to the human reference genome (GRCh37/hg19). The pathogenicity of identified variants was interpreted according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines (Richards et al., 2015), using the following classification categories: pathogenic, likely pathogenic, variant of uncertain significance, likely benign, and benign. Candidate variants identified by WES were validated by Sanger sequencing in the proband and her parents. Specific PCR amplification of ALMS1 gene fragments was carried out using the following primer pairs: for the c.12114 + 1G>T variant, forward 5′-CCCCTGAGAACCTGTATT-3′ and reverse 5′-ACAGATGATGAGAAACCC-3’; for the c.1856_1860dup variant, forward 5′-CATTTATCCTTGTCCCTT-3′ and reverse 5′-CTGTAGGTATTCCCGTCT-3’. The frameshift variant was evaluated using online software MutationTaster (http://mutationtaster.org) for pathogenicity prediction. The potential impact of the splice-site variant on ALMS1 RNA secondary structure was predicted using the RNAfold web server (http://rna.tbi.univie.ac.at/cgi-bin/RNAWebSuite/RNAfold.cgi), which uses a loop-based energy model and dynamic programming algorithm to predict secondary structures of linear or circular single-stranded RNA.
3. Results
3.1. Clinical manifestation
3.1.1. Ophthalmic manifestations
The patient was a 27-year-old Chinese female. She first experienced visual impairment at age 8 years, which was initially attributed to bilateral congenital amblyopia. Ocular examination showed best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.1 (20/200) in both eyes. Cycloplegic refraction revealed no myopia, no hyperopia, and no astigmatism. Intraocular pressure was bilaterally elevated (OD: 21.5 mmHg; OS: 24.7 mmHg). No nystagmus was observed clinically or on video nystagmography. OCT of the left eye (OS) showed a shallow detachment between the neurosensory retina (photoreceptor layer) and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), along with focal retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thinning (Figure 2; Supplementary Figure S1). Perimetry identified bilateral constricted (tubular) visual fields, characterized by peripheral visual field loss with central sparing (Supplementary Figures S2, S3). VEP testing demonstrated bilaterally prolonged P100 latency, indicating abnormal electrical activity of the bilateral visual pathways (Supplementary Figure S4; Supplementary Table S1). Full-field electroretinography (ffERG) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging were not performed (patient declined), which precludes definitive characterization of the retinal dystrophy subtype and represents a limitation of this study.
FIGURE 2.
Clinical and imaging findings of the patient. (A) The patient presented with a round face and sparse hair. (B) Abdominal ultrasonography revealed hepatic steatosis and a medullary sponge kidney. (C) Perimetry demonstrated bilateral visual field defects. (D,E) Optical coherence tomography of the left eye revealed a shallow detachment between the neurosensory retina (photoreceptors) and the retinal pigment epithelium, with associated focal RNFL thinning.
3.1.2. Systemic manifestations
The patient was born at full-term to a non-consanguineous family, and her first-degree relatives (parents and sister) were healthy with no known genetic disorders. She had a long-standing history of obesity dating back to childhood, with a body mass index (BMI) of 28.4 kg/m2 at admission. Bilateral hearing loss began at age 2 years, progressed over time, and was formally diagnosed as bilateral sensorineural hearing loss at age 17 years, necessitating hearing aids. At age 17 years, she developed scaly, patchy papules on the scalp, face, trunk, and limbs, accompanied by progressive alopecia, managed with topical glucocorticoids. By age 22 years, she was diagnosed with PCOS, manifesting as irregular menstrual cycles, and concurrently with T2DM.
Abdominal ultrasonography revealed hepatic steatosis and findings suggestive of medullary sponge kidney (Figure 2). Echocardiography showed thickening of the ventricular septum (maximum thickness: 12 mm), with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Pelvic ultrasound indicated bilateral ovarian enlargement (left: 4.2 × 1.7 cm; right: 5.7 × 4.1 cm). The left ovary contained at least 12 follicles per cross-section, each <0.5 cm in diameter. The right ovary showed 7–8 follicles measuring 2–10 mm. These findings are consistent with a polycystic ovarian morphology. Routine laboratory tests were performed, and the results are summarized in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Laboratory findings of the patient.
| Parameter | Value | Normal range |
|---|---|---|
| Glycemic parameters | ||
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) | 7.63 | 3.9-6.1 |
| Fasting insulin (μU/mL) | 30.14 | 3-25 |
| C‑peptid (ng/mL) | 4.54 | 0.81-3.85 |
| HbA1c (%) | 6.6 | 4-6.2 |
| Blood lipid | ||
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.53 | 2.80-5.17 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.49 | 0.01-1.7 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 0.76 | 1.29-1.55 |
| LDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 3.6 | 0-3.37 |
| Autoantibodies in diabetes | ||
| GADA | Neg. | Neg. |
| ICA | Neg. | Neg. |
| IAA | Neg. | Neg. |
| IA-2A | Neg. | Neg. |
| Hepatic function | ||
| ALT (U/L) | 31 | 7-40 |
| AST (U/L) | 25 | 13-35 |
| Renal function | ||
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 68.3 | 41.0-73.0 |
| Cardiac biomarkers | ||
| CK (U/L) | 46 | 40-200 |
| LDH (U/L) | 72.83 | 17-96 |
| BNP (pg/mL) | 29 | 0-100 |
| Thyroid related indicators | ||
| FT3 (pg/mL) | 2.44 | 2.3-4.2 |
| FT4 (ng/dL) | 1.11 | 0.89-1.76 |
| TSH (μIU/mL) | 1.95 | 0.55-4.78 |
| Sex hormones | ||
| FSH (mIU/mL) | 4.46 | 1.5-9.1 |
| LH (mIU/mL) | 5.99 | 1.9-12.5 |
| Progesterone (ng/mL) | 4.46 | 3.34-25.56 |
| Testosterone (ng/dL) | 27.90 | 9.01-47.94 |
| Estradiol (pg/mL) | 245.05 | 63.9-356.7 |
| Prolactin (ng/mL) | 7.89 | 2.8-29.2 |
| DHEA‑S (ng/mL) | 1477 | 180-4000 |
| Adrenal function parameters | ||
| Cortisol (nmol/L) | 284.26 | 145.4-619.1 |
| ACTH (pg/mL) | 15.40 | 5.00-60.00 |
HbAlc, glycated hemoglobin; Neg., negative; IAA, insulin antibody; ICA, islet cell antibody; IA-2A, protein tyrosine phosphatase antibody; GADA, glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CK, creatine kinase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; FT3, free triiodothyronine; FT4, free thyroxine; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; DHEA-S, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate; ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone.
Following the diagnosis of a ciliopathy resembling AS, management included metformin and pioglitazone for T2DM, continued use of hearing aids, and scheduled regular follow-up evaluations.
3.2. Genetic findings
We conducted a comprehensive genetic assessment of the patient with AS and her parents. Genetic testing identified the patient as a compound heterozygote for two novel variants in the ALMS1 gene: c.12114 + 1G>T (canonical splice donor) and c.1856_1860dup (p.Ser621Leufs*23) (Figure 3). Segregation analysis by Sanger sequencing confirmed that the c.12114 + 1G>T variant, located in exon 19, was inherited from the father (II-1), while the c.1856_1860dup variant in exon 8 was inherited from the mother (II-2), establishing that the two variants are located in trans. Neither variant has been previously reported in the literature, and both were absent from public population databases, including the 1000 Genomes Project, ExAC, and gnomAD. However, the ALMS1 c.12114 + 1G>T variant was documented in ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/) with a classification of likely pathogenic. RNA secondary structure predictions using RNAfold (http://rna.tbi.univie.ac.at/cgi-bin/RNAWebSuite/RNAfold.cgi) indicated that the c.12114 + 1G>T variant leads to a significant alteration in RNA structure of ALMS1 in both the patient and her father (Figure 4). MutationTaster predicted that the c.1856_1860dup variant is disease-causing (probability = 1.0). According to ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines, the c.12114 + 1G>T variant meets criteria PVS1 (canonical splice variant expected to cause loss of function), PM2 (absent from population databases), and PM3 (in trans with another loss-of-function variant). The c.1856_1860dup variant also meets PVS1 (frameshift leading to premature termination), PM2, and PM3. However, due to the incomplete ocular phenotyping (lack of ERG and FAF), we conservatively classify both variants as likely pathogenic (Class 4). Functional studies and complete ophthalmic testing would be required to upgrade to pathogenic (Class 5).
FIGURE 3.
Genetic characteristics and pedigree of the family. (A) Sequencing analysis revealed that the proband (III-1) is a compound heterozygote for two novel variants: c.12114 + 1G>T and c.1856_1860dup (p.Ser621Leufs*23). (B) Pedigree of the family. Squares represent males and circles represent females. The arrow indicates the proband.
FIGURE 4.
RNA secondary structure prediction. The ALMS1 RNA secondary structures of native (A) and variant (B) types were predicted by RNAfold and revealed that c.12114 + 1G>T caused a marked change in the RNA structure of ALMS1. The bars at the bottom of the figure indicate base pairing probability.
4. Discussion
AS is a rare autosomal recessive ciliopathy caused by biallelic loss-of-function variants in ALMS1. The encoded protein localizes to the centrosome and the base of primary cilia, where it plays essential roles in maintaining ciliary structure and function, mediating intracellular transport, ciliary signaling, and cell differentiation (Joy et al., 2007; Marshall et al., 2007b). ALMS1 is widely expressed in the central nervous system, retinal photoreceptors, endocrine organs, heart, liver, kidney, and inner ear, accounting for the multisystemic and highly variable clinical manifestations of AS (Choudhury et al., 2021; Tahani et al., 2020).
4.1. Clinical spectrum and comparison with reported splice-site variants
Retinal dystrophy represents a core feature of AS, typically presenting with photophobia and nystagmus and progressing to complete blindness by the second decade of life (Tahani et al., 2020; Jecan-Toader et al., 2024). This is frequently accompanied by bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, which develops in approximately 70% of patients before the age of 10 (Tahani et al., 2020; Jecan-Toader et al., 2024). Endocrine and metabolic disturbances are common, including early-onset obesity, insulin resistance, and T2DM. The underlying metabolic dysregulation is linked to enhanced insulin-mediated GLUT4 translocation, a process facilitated by ALMS1 mutations through interactions with the actin cytoskeleton that promote cellular glucose uptake (Choudhury et al., 2021). Other frequent endocrine complications comprise hypertriglyceridemia and, in female patients, hyperandrogenism (Han et al., 2018). The diagnosis of AS, as per established guidelines, is based on this constellation of symptoms that worsen over time, supplemented by genetic confirmation. Identifying biallelic pathogenic variants in the ALMS1 gene is central to definitive diagnosis. In the present case, genetic analysis confirmed that both the proband and her parents carried the ALMS1 mutation. Consequently, the patient’s systemic phenotype is suggestive of a ciliopathy, although the absence of ffERG/FAF prevents complete confirmation of the retinal phenotype.
As shown in Table 2, the clinical phenotypes of previously reported ALMS1 splice-site variants are summarized alongside the novel variant identified in our patient (c.12114 + 1G>T). Comparing our patient with these previously reported cases, we note that obesity, hearing loss, and diabetes are common but not universal. Dilated cardiomyopathy was absent in our patient, although echocardiography showed isolated septal thickening. Renal manifestations varied from microalbuminuria to medullary sponge kidney. Eye findings across all cases consistently included photophobia, reduced vision, and retinal degeneration, but the severity and specific features (e.g., nystagmus and optic atrophy) differed.
TABLE 2.
Phenotypic spectrum associated with ALMS1 splice-site mutations.
| Clinical manifestation | Variant | c.7677 + 1G>T (Shi et al., 2023) | c.12114 + 1G>T | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c.11550 + 3A>T (Weiss et al., 2019) | c.11666–2A>G (Kılınç et al., 2018) | c.11876–3T>G (Sanyoura et al., 2014) | c.11876–2A>T (Aldahmesh et al., 2009) | c.11873–2A>T (Saadah et al., 2021) | c.9542G>A (Shi et al., 2023) | |||
| Obesity | + | + | - | + | + | - | - | + |
| Dilated cardiomyopathy | + | + | - | - | + | - | - | - |
| Hearing loss | + | - | + | - | + | + | - | + |
| Diabetes | | - | + | - | + | + | - | + |
| Short stature | + | - | - | + | + | | - | + |
| Renal dysfunction | | Microalbuminuria | + | - | - | + | - | - |
| Acanthosis nigricans | + | + | - | + | + | + | - | - |
| Hormone level | Hypothyroidism | - | Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism | - | Hypothyroidism, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism | - | | Hyperandrogenism |
| Eyes condition | Nystagmus, vision loss | Photophobia, retinal dystrophy, vision loss | Early-onset retinopathy with optic atrophy, nystagmus Blindness |
Nystagmus, retinal dystrophy, vision loss | Photophobia, nystagmus, retinal dystrophy, vision loss | Reduced vision, cone-rod dystrophy | Nystagmus, photophobia, reduced vision, squint | Photophobia, degenerative retinal changes Reduced vision |
4.2. Genetic findings and variant classification
Currently, five major categories of ALMS1 pathogenic variants have been documented, predominantly comprising frameshift, nonsense, and missense mutations (Cheng et al., 2022). Notably, frameshift and nonsense variants constitute the most frequent categories, and almost half of all variants occur in exon 8—a finding that may be explained by the unusually large size of this exon. In the present case, we identified two variants: c.1856_1860dup in exon 8 and c.12114 + 1G>T in exon 19. Segregation analysis confirmed that the two variants are in trans. The c.1856_1860dup variant is a frameshift insertion that leads to a premature termination codon 23 amino acids downstream (p.Ser621Leufs*23). This is predicted to result in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay or production of a truncated, non-functional ALMS1 protein. MutationTaster predicted this variant to be disease-causing with a probability of 1.0. Although it is novel, its loss-of-function nature and absence from population databases support likely pathogenicity. The latter is a splice-site mutation consistent with previously reported variants (Saadah et al., 2021). Based on its autosomal recessive inheritance pattern and supporting evidence from in silico analysis, we propose that this variant is likely disease-causative. Given the lack of experimental functional data, we performed a predictive analysis of the c.12114 + 1G>T variant using RNAfold software. This in silico analysis predicted that the variant alters the secondary structure and folding dynamics of ALMS1 mRNA. The change in the secondary structure of the RNA resulting from the splice-site variant may further alter its function through two possible mechanisms. First, loss of correct RNA folding would abolish or alter its functionally critical interactions with protein complexes such as the spliceosome, thereby disrupting mRNA splicing, RNA transport, or both (Magnus et al., 2019). Second, the misfolded RNA may conceal or alter miRNA binding sites, compromising normal post-transcriptional regulation and contributing to disease etiology (Soemedi et al., 2017; Anna and Monika, 2018).
4.3. Genotype–phenotype correlation
Recent studies have attempted to elucidate correlations between clinical features and pathogenic variants in the ALMS1 gene. Marshall et al. (2007b) reported a significant association between variants in exon 8 and absent, mild, or delayed renal disease while also identifying a suggestive link between variants in exon 16 and diabetes, cardiomyopathy, retinal degeneration, and urological dysfunction. A meta-analysis involving 357 patients with AS further revealed that variants in exon 10 were associated with higher rates of liver disease (Bea-Mascato and Valverde, 2023). Nevertheless, the study concluded that the location of the pathogenic variant has minimal influence on overall disease manifestations (Bea-Mascato and Valverde, 2023). Similarly, Ozantürk et al. (2015) observed no direct relationship between mutation type and clinical phenotype, despite the progressive multisystem involvement consistently observed in AS patients. In this study, we performed a literature review focusing on pathogenic splicing variants in ALMS1 and found no clear association between these variants and specific clinical outcomes. A previous study has highlighted that identical mutations can lead to widely varying clinical characteristics, age of onset, and disease severity, even within families (Bea-Mascato and Valverde, 2023). This may be attributed to the fact that phenotypic expression can be modulated by modifying factors, such as environmental influences and infectious exposures.
4.4. Management
There is currently no cure for AS, and no disease-modifying therapy has been proven to prevent or reverse existing organ damage. Consequently, early diagnosis and intervention are essential to mitigate multi-organ progression and improve long-term prognosis and quality of life. Beyond systemic disease management, addressing associated comorbidities is critical. For hearing impairment, cochlear implants can restore auditory function, enabling communicative, social, and academic outcomes comparable to those of peers (Gheller et al., 2020). In metabolic management, lifestyle modifications—including a low-calorie, low-fat diet and regular physical activity—support weight loss and can improve glycemic and lipid profiles (Geets et al., 2019). Pharmacologically, metformin and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are utilized to treat insulin resistance and T2DM in AS patients (Tahani et al., 2020). When weight loss is clinically indicated, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) represent a recommended therapeutic option (Tahani et al., 2020). Notably, recent evidence highlights the dual GIP/GLP-1 agonist tirzepatide as effective in reducing body weight, improving metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, and ameliorating insulin resistance in AS (Ferch et al., 2025). In the present case, the patient was prescribed metformin and pioglitazone for T2DM, advised to continue using hearing aids, and scheduled for regular follow-up assessments.
5. Conclusion
In this case, we identified two novel variants in ALMS1 (c.12114 + 1G>T and c.1856_1860dup) in a patient presenting with a ciliopathy phenotype resembling AS. Due to incomplete ocular phenotyping (lack of ffERG and FAF) and the absence of functional validation, a definitive diagnosis of AS could not be established. Our findings expand the mutational spectrum of ALMS1 and highlight the diagnostic challenges posed by overlapping ciliopathy phenotypes. Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation, including ffERG and FAF, functional studies, and whole-genome sequencing are needed to clarify the role of these variants and to achieve a precise diagnosis. This case underscores the importance of cautious interpretation of genetic findings when the clinical phenotype is incomplete.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the proband and their family members who were willing to participate in this study.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Footnotes
Edited by: Yousef MohammedRabaa Hawsawi, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Saudi Arabia
Reviewed by: Palaiologos Alexopoulos, New York University, United States
Monika Grudzinska Pechhacker, Karolinska Institutet (KI), Sweden
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Chongqing Liangjiang New Area People’s Hospital (Approval No. 2025-193). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
C-QR: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. MY: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. LC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. XL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2026.1821427/full#supplementary-material
References
- Aldahmesh M. A., Abu-Safieh L., Khan A. O., Al-Hassnan Z. N., Shaheen R., Rajab M., et al. (2009). Allelic heterogeneity in inbred populations: the Saudi experience with alström syndrome as an illustrative example. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 149A (4), 662–665. 10.1002/ajmg.a.32753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alström C. H., Hallgren B., Nilsson L. B., Asander H. (1959). Retinal degeneration combined with obesity, diabetes mellitus and neurogenous deafness: a specific syndrome (not hitherto described) distinct from the Laurence-Moon-Bardet-Biedl syndrome: a clinical, endocrinological and genetic examination based on a large pedigree. Acta Psychiatr. Neurol. Scand. Suppl. 129, 1–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anna A., Monika G. (2018). Splicing mutations in human genetic disorders: examples, detection, and confirmation. J. Appl. Genet. 59 (3), 253–268. 10.1007/s13353-018-0444-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bea-Mascato B., Valverde D. (2023). Genotype-phenotype associations in alström syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Med. Genet. 61 (1), 18–26. 10.1136/jmg-2023-109175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bond J., Flintoff K., Higgins J., Scott S., Bennet C., Parsons J., et al. (2005). The importance of seeking ALMS1 mutations in infants with dilated cardiomyopathy. J. Med. Genet. 42 (2), e10. 10.1136/jmg.2004.026617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng W. Y., Ma M. J., Yuan S. Q., Qi X. L., Rong W. N., Sheng X. L. (2022). New pathogenic variants of ALMS1 gene in two chinese families with alström syndrome. BMC Ophthalmol. 22 (1), 386. 10.1186/s12886-022-02597-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choudhury A. R., Munonye I., Sanu K. P., Islam N., Gadaga C. (2021). A review of alström syndrome: a rare monogenic ciliopathy. Intractable Rare Dis. Res. 10 (4), 257–262. 10.5582/irdr.2021.01113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collin G. B., Marshall J. D., Ikeda A., So W. V., Russell-Eggitt I., Maffei P., et al. (2002). Mutations in ALMS1 cause obesity, type 2 diabetes and neurosensory degeneration in alström syndrome. Nat. Genet. 31 (1), 74–78. 10.1038/ng867 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeMaagd R. L., Engber W. D. (1989). Retrograde Herbert screw fixation for treatment of proximal pole scaphoid nonunions. J. Hand Surg. Am. 14 (6), 996–1003. 10.1016/s0363-5023(89)80050-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferch M., Peitsch I., Kautzky-Willer A., Greber-Platzer S., Stättermayer A. F., Krebs M., et al. (2025). Effectiveness of the dual GIP/GLP1-agonist tirzepatide in 2 cases of alström syndrome, a rare obesity syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 110 (12), 3364–3369. 10.1210/clinem/dgaf258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Focşa I. O., Budişteanu M., Bălgrădean M. (2021). Clinical and genetic heterogeneity of primary ciliopathies. Int. J. Mol. Med. 48 (3), 176. 10.3892/ijmm.2021.5009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geets E., Meuwissen M. E. C., Hul W. V. (2019). Clinical, molecular genetics and therapeutic aspects of syndromic obesity. Clin. Genet. 95 (1), 23–40. 10.1111/cge.13367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gerth-Kahlert C., Koller S. (2018). Ciliopathies. Klin. Monbl Augenheilkd 235 (3), 264–272. 10.1055/a-0573-9199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gheller F., Gallo S., Trevisi P., Caserta E., Dassie F., Maffei P., et al. (2020). Cochlear implants in alström syndrome. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 129 (8), 833–837. 10.1177/0003489420903061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Han J. C., Reyes-Capo D. P., Liu C. Y., Reynolds J. C., Turkbey E., Turkbey I. B., et al. (2018). Comprehensive endocrine-metabolic evaluation of patients with alström syndrome compared with BMI-matched controls. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 103 (7), 2707–2719. 10.1210/jc.2018-00496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hearn T. (2019). ALMS1 and alström syndrome: a recessive form of metabolic, neurosensory and cardiac deficits. J. Mol. Med. 97 (1), 1–17. 10.1007/s00109-018-1714-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hearn T., Renforth G. L., Spalluto C., Hanley N. A., Piper K., Brickwood S., et al. (2002). Mutation of ALMS1, a large gene with a tandem repeat encoding 47 amino acids, causes alström syndrome. Nat. Genet. 31 (1), 79–83. 10.1038/ng874 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hearn T., Spalluto C., Phillips V. J., Renforth G. L., Copin N., Hanley N. A., et al. (2005). Subcellular localization of ALMS1 supports involvement of centrosome and basal body dysfunction in the pathogenesis of obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 54 (5), 1581–1587. 10.2337/diabetes.54.5.1581 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu M., Chen S., Wu J. Y., Wang R. (2024). Whole-exome sequencing revealed a novel mutation of the ALMS1 gene in a chinesefamily with alström syndrome: a case report. BMC Pediatr. 24 (1), 494. 10.1186/s12887-024-04949-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jecan-Toader D., Trifa A., Lucian B., Pop T. L., Cainap S. S. (2024). Alström syndrome-wide clinical variability within the same variant: a case report and literature review. Front. Pediatr. 12, 1463903. 10.3389/fped.2024.1463903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joy T., Cao H., Black G., Malik R., Charlton-Menys V., Hegele R. A., et al. (2007). Alstrom syndrome (OMIM 203800): a case report and literature review. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2, 49. 10.1186/1750-1172-2-49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kılınç S., Yücel-Yılmaz D., Ardagil A., Apaydın S., Valverde D., Özgül R. K., et al. (2018). Five novel ALMS1 gene mutations in six patients with alström syndrome. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 31 (6), 681–687. 10.1515/jpem-2017-0418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Magnus M., Kappel K., Das R., Bujnicki J. M. (2019). RNA 3D structure prediction guided by independent folding of homologous sequences. BMC Bioinforma. 20 (1), 512. 10.1186/s12859-019-3120-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marshall J. D., Beck S., Maffei P., Naggert J. K. (2007a). Alström syndrome. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 15 (12), 1193–1202. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201933 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marshall J. D., Hinman E. G., Collin G. B., Beck S., Cerqueira R., Maffei P., et al. (2007b). Spectrum of ALMS1 variants and evaluation of genotype-phenotype correlations in alström syndrome. Hum. Mutat. 28 (11), 1114–1123. 10.1002/humu.20577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marshall J. D., Maffei P., Collin G. B., Naggert J. K. (2011). Alström syndrome: genetics and clinical overview. Curr. Genomics 12 (3), 225–235. 10.2174/138920211795677912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marshall J. D., Muller J., Collin G. B., Milan G., Kingsmore S. F., Dinwiddie D., et al. (2015). Alström syndrome: mutation spectrum of ALMS1 . Hum. Mutat. 36 (7), 660–668. 10.1002/humu.22796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nikopoulos K., Butt G. U., Farinelli P., Mudassar M., Domènech-Estévez E., Samara C., et al. (2016). A large multiexonic genomic deletion within the ALMS1 gene causes alström syndrome in a consanguineous pakistani family. Clin. Genet. 89 (4), 510–511. 10.1111/cge.12645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ozantürk A., Marshall J. D., Collin G. B., Düzenli S., Marshall R. P., Candan Ş., et al. (2015). The phenotypic and molecular genetic spectrum of alström syndrome in 44 turkish kindreds and a literature review of alström syndrome in Turkey. J. Hum. Genet. 60 (1), 1–9. 10.1038/jhg.2014.85 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richards S., Aziz N., Bale S., Bick D., Das S., Gastier-Foster J., et al. (2015). Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the american college of medical genetics and genomics and the association for molecular pathology. Genet. Med. 17 (5), 405–424. 10.1038/gim.2015.30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saadah O. I., Banaganapalli B., Kamal N. M., Sahly A. N., Alsufyani H. A., Mohammed A., et al. (2021). Identification of a rare exon 19 skipping mutation in ALMS1 gene in alström syndrome patients from two unrelated saudi families. Front. Pediatr. 9, 652011. 10.3389/fped.2021.652011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanyoura M., Woudstra C., Halaby G., Baz P., Senée V., Guillausseau P. J., et al. (2014). A novel ALMS1 splice mutation in a non-obese juvenile-onset insulin-dependent syndromic diabetic patient. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 22 (1), 140–143. 10.1038/ejhg.2013.87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi J., Xu K., Zhang X., Xie Y., Chang H., Li Y. (2023). A novel missense ALMS1 variant causes aberrant splicing identified in a cohort of patients with alström syndrome. Front. Genet. 13, 1104420. 10.3389/fgene.2022.1104420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soemedi R., Cygan K. J., Rhine C. L., Glidden D. T., Taggart A. J., Lin C. L., et al. (2017). The effects of structure on pre-mRNA processing and stability. Methods 125, 36–44. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tahani N., Maffei P., Dollfus H., Paisey R., Valverde D., Milan G., et al. (2020). Consensus clinical management guidelines for alström syndrome. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 15 (1), 253. 10.1186/s13023-020-01468-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taşkesen M., Collin G. B., Evsikov A. V., Güzel A., Özgül R. K., Marshall J. D., et al. (2012). Novel alu retrotransposon insertion leading to alström syndrome. Hum. Genet. 131 (3), 407–413. 10.1007/s00439-011-1083-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weiss S., Cohen L., Ben-Yosef T., Ehrenberg M., Goldenberg-Cohen N. (2019). Late diagnosis of alstrom syndrome in a yemenite-jewish child. Ophthalmic Genet. 40 (1), 7–11. 10.1080/13816810.2018.1561900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.




