Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1979 Jan;31(1):53–70. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-53

Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: instructional control of human loss avoidance

Mark Galizio
PMCID: PMC1332789  PMID: 16812123

Abstract

Instructions can override the influence of programmed schedules of reinforcement. Although this finding has been interpreted as a limitation of reinforcement schedule control in humans, an alternative approach considers instructional control, itself, as a phenomenon determined by subjects' reinforcement histories. This approach was supported in a series of experiments that studied instructional and schedule control when instructions either did or did not accord with the schedule of reinforcement. Experiment I demonstrated that accurate instructions control discriminative performances on multiple avoidance schedules, and that such control persists in a novel discrimination. Experiments II and III showed that elimination of instruction-following occurs when inaccurate instructions cause subjects to contact a monetary loss contingency. Experiment IV demonstrated the reinforcing properties of accurate instructions. Skinner's view of rule-governed behavior is consistent with these findings, and can be extended to account for many aspects of instructional control of human operant behavior.

Keywords: instructions avoidance, stimulus control, monetary loss, observing behavior, rule-governed behavior, adult humans

Full text

PDF
53

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AYLLON T., AZRIN N. H. REINFORCEMENT AND INSTRUCTIONS WITH MENTAL PATIENTS. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jul;7:327–331. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baron A., Galizio M. Clock control of human performance on avoidance and fixed-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Sep;26(2):165–180. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baron A., Kaufman A. Facilitation and suppression of human loss-avoidance by signaled, unavoidable loss. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Mar;11(2):177–185. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baron A., Kaufman A., Stauber K. A. Effects of instructions and reinforcement-feedback on human operant behavior maintained by fixed-interval reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):701–712. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Matthews B. A., Shimoff E., Catania A. C., Sagvolden T. Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 May;27(3):453–467. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Schmitt D. R. Effects of reinforcement rate and reinforcer magnitude on choice behavior of humans. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):409–419. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Schutte R. C., Hopkins B. L. The effects of teacher attention on following instructions in a kindergarten class. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Summer;3(2):117–122. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Scobie S. R., Kaufman A. Intermittent punishment of human responding maintained by intermittent reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jan;12(1):137–147. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Striefel S. Timeout and concurrent fixed-ratio schedules with human subjects. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Mar;17(2):213–219. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Urcuioli P. J., Nevin J. A. Transfer of hue matching in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Sep;24(2):149–155. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Urcuioli P. J. Transfer of oddity-from-sample performance in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jan;27(1):195–202. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. WEINER H. Some effects of response cost upon human operant behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Apr;5:201–208. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES