Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2026 Jul 2;63(1):739. doi: 10.1007/s12035-026-06014-4

Hypothalamus Amyloid Levels Are Associated with Early Sex-Dependent Alterations in Peripheral Energy Homeostasis in TgF344-AD Rats

Caleb M Levine 1, Cameron Caggiano 1, Thea Anderson 1, Michael A Kelberman 2, David Weinshenker 2, Hannah L Lail 3, Desiree Wanders 1,3, Debra A Bangasser 1,4, Scott E Kanoski 5, Marise B Parent 1,4,6,✉
PMCID: PMC13328149  PMID: 42390646

Abstract

We reported previously that diet-induced obesity exacerbates early-stage Alzheimer’s disease (AD)–like pathology in TgF344-AD rats. Those findings also suggested that they may be prone to weight gain during early AD development, raising the possibility of early hypothalamic dysfunction. In this study, we investigate this by determining whether hypothalamic soluble amyloid-β40 (Aβ40) and amyloid-β42 (Aβ42) are detectable during early AD development in TgF344-AD rats and whether their presence is associated with alterations in energy homeostasis. Energy intake, body composition, whole body glucose clearance, body temperature rhythms, interscapular brown adipose tissue (iBAT) mass, and iBAT expression of the thermogenic uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) were assessed. The results demonstrate that Aβ40 and Aβ42 are detectable in the hypothalamus during the early stages of AD development and that hypothalamic but not cortical Aβ42 is associated with impaired glucose regulation in males and iBAT mass in females. Male TgF344-AD rats became heavier than wild-type (WT) littermates by 5 weeks of age, with a similar increase emerging later in females (~ 5 months). Female TgF344-AD rats consumed more chow and a high-fat high-sugar (HFHS) diet, gained more weight on that diet, and showed reduced UCP1, effects not seen in males. Both sexes exhibited elevated body temperatures. This increase was restricted to the dark phase in females, coinciding with excess caloric intake. Finally, HFHS feeding impaired glucose regulation in male but not female TgF344-AD rats. These findings suggest hypothalamic Aβ42 may contribute to sex-specific disruptions in peripheral energy homeostasis that may be an early symptom of AD development.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12035-026-06014-4.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, Blood glucose, Metabolism, Brown adipose tissue, Uncoupling 1 protein

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, affecting an estimated 416 million people worldwide, and AD prevalence is expected to continue to increase [1, 2]. Currently, the most effective treatments available only modestly attenuate AD symptoms and slow the rate of decline, and neither curative nor preventative solutions are available [3, 4]. AD is characterized by the progressive deposition of amyloid-β peptides (Aβ) as plaques, the development of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) composed primarily of the hyperphosphorylated microtubule-associated protein tau (ptau), and eventual neuronal death [5, 6]. AD starts to develop during middle age decades before dementia is diagnosed and progresses in stages. The preclinical stage is the earliest asymptomatic stage where there is pathology, but no perceptible cognitive decline and noncognitive symptoms may be present [7]. This pathology includes elevated Aβ and changes in tau that often go undetected until mild cognitive impairment (MCI) appears during the prodromal stage, which in turn lasts until frank dementia emerges during the clinical stage [8–13].

Many risk factors associated with AD exert their effects during the preclinical and prodromal periods (i.e., during middle age). Of note, midlife obesity doubles AD risk and predicts earlier AD onset and more severe pathology [14–16]. This is a significant concern because the worldwide prevalence of obesity has nearly tripled since 1975 [17]. Although midlife obesity is associated with increased AD risk [18–23], late-life obesity is not, suggesting that the risk interactions between obesity and AD occur during preclinical/prodromal AD stages. Even though revised guidelines have allowed the diagnosis of AD at earlier stages of pathology based on positive imaging or blood biomarkers, not all will go on to develop symptoms of AD [24]. As a result, it remains very challenging to investigate the mechanisms underlying risk factors during preclinical and prodromal AD.

Given these challenges, nonhuman animal models are vital for investigating the neural changes that occur during early AD development and for understanding how risk factors increase the likelihood of transitioning from early to later stages. Of all rodent models currently available, the TgF344-AD rat, which expresses the Swedish mutant human amyloid precursor protein (APPsw) and Δexon9 mutant human presenilin-1 (PS1 ΔE9), appears to most closely recapitulate human AD trajectory [25]. TgF344-AD rats develop elevations in Aβ oligomers (Aβos), intraneuronal Aβ, plaques, progressive memory deficits, neuroinflammation, gliosis, and apoptotic neuronal injury/loss in an age-dependent manner [25, 26]. Unique to this model, Aβ triggers endogenous tauopathy consisting of NFT-like aggregated rat ptau in brain areas relevant to early AD pathology, such as the locus coeruleus, hippocampus, cortex, and entorhinal cortex [25–30]. This is a significant advantage of this model because tau pathology is more closely related to the etiology of neurodegeneration and dementia than Aβ [31, 32].

Importantly, pathology proceeds through characteristic preclinical, prodromal, and “clinical” stages as TgF344‐AD rats age. The first signs of the preclinical period appear in TgF344-AD between 4 and 6 months of age with increased anxiety [33], sleep disturbances [34], and spatial orientation defects [35]. Spatial memory defects occur inconsistently at 6 months [33, 36], and prodromal symptomology becomes clearer by 7 months with more spatial memory [36–38], cognitive flexibility [39], and working memory [40] reductions. By 10–12 months, TgF344-AD rats have impaired place avoidance learning [41], continued spatial memory defects [35, 42], and disrupted novel object performance [43]. Beyond 14 months, TgF344-AD rats are in their clinical phase and exhibit substantial cognitive impairment [35, 44–47], aggregated ptau [35, 48], and neuronal loss [35].

Evidence suggests that peripheral energy homeostasis may be disrupted in TgF344-AD rats. For example, TgF344-AD rats fed standard chow weigh more than their WT counterparts [49–51] and have elevated blood lipid levels [51]. Moreover, feeding high-fat/high-sugar (HFHS) diets to TgF344-AD rats, particularly females, produces larger elevations in weight gain and adiposity than in WT rats [52, 53]. The findings from the last two studies are particularly intriguing as they examined the effects of diet-induced weight gain during the prodromal period in these rats, when obesity is most impactful as a risk factor for future AD development in humans. This evidence of disrupted energy homeostasis during early AD development raises the possibility that the hypothalamus, which is critical for energy homeostasis [54, 55], is impaired during early AD development in these rats. In support, Aβ plaques and NFTs have been observed in the hypothalamus of patients with AD, although most of this pathology has been identified in later stages of AD development [56]. Importantly, a recent systematic review demonstrated that patients with mild to moderate AD have reduced hypothalamic volume, suggesting that the hypothalamus may indeed be impacted earlier in AD [57]. Given the protracted time course of pathological changes that occur over decades in AD, these findings suggest that the hypothalamus may be implicated in AD prior to clinical diagnosis.

Based on the evidence reviewed above, the goal of the present study was to determine whether soluble amyloid pathology is present in the hypothalamus of female and male TgF344-AD rats during the earliest stages of AD development and whether it is associated with changes in peripheral energy homeostasis. If the findings indicated that hypothalamic Aβ in these rats is associated with a propensity toward weight gain and metabolic disturbances, then this might suggest that disruptions in peripheral energy homeostasis are an early symptom of AD development that may potentially contribute to the risk effects of obesity during prodromal AD.

Materials and Methods

Animals

A breeding colony was established at Georgia State University using hemizygous TgF344-AD sires and Fischer 344 WT dams (Charles River Laboratories, Kingston, NY). Pups were genotyped using ear tissue punch biopsies taken at weaning on postnatal (P) days 21–25 (Transnetyx, Memphis, TN). Unless otherwise stated, rats were housed in pairs or triads in ventilated polycarbonate cages in a temperature and humidity-controlled facility (25 °C, 40% humidity) on a 12-h light–dark cycle with lights on at 7 a.m. The rats were given ad libitum access to food and water. All animal procedures were approved by the Georgia State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), carried out in accordance with NIH (National Research Council) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and in compliance with ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines. The age of the TgF344-AD rats was used to determine which AD stage they were in when a measure was collected. Many were obtained in rats that were ~ 4.5 months of age, which corresponds to the preclinical stage where AD pathology and behavioral changes are present but cognitive symptoms are largely absent [25, 33, 53, 58, 59].

Body Mass

To determine when differences in body mass emerge, male and female offspring of each genotype were weighed weekly from weaning on P21 until P70. An independent cross-sectional assessment of body mass in male and female TgF344-AD and WT rats of different age groups was also obtained from a colony at Emory University. Those procedures were approved by the Emory University IACUC.

Energy Intake

To assess energy intake, rats were housed individually at 4–5 months of age in cages equipped with food hoppers hanging from scales (TSE LabMaster Metabolic Research Platform, TSE Systems International, Chesterfield, Missouri). This is the age when we have observed weight differences between TgF344-AD and WT in our previous research [53]. At this age, TgF344-AD rats are in the preclinical stage wherein they demonstrate brain pathology and behavioral changes, but cognition appears intact [25, 33, 53, 58, 59]. The rats were given free access to standard chow (LabDiet 5001, Richmond, IN), water, and a Nylabone for enrichment. The rats were given 3 days to acclimate to the new housing, and then, chow intake was assessed for 4 days. On the eighth day, all rats were given a palatable high calorie (kcal) HFHS diet that supplied 45% of the kcal from fat and half of the carbohydrates from sucrose (S. Table 1, Research Diets D12451, New Brunswick, NJ). Intake was assessed for 4 days yielding within-subject responses to both chow and the HFHS diet. We elected to assess intake over 4 days based on evidence showing that this duration is sufficient to assess steady-state intake. Specifically, food intake in laboratory rats is generally stable across 4 days, intake is representative by the third day, and rats adjust and stabilize their intake within 2–3 days when feeding conditions change [60, 61]. Moreover, our results show that intake is stable after 4 days in WT rats (S. Figure 2a,b). Food intake was recorded every 27 min. Each morning, the recording was stopped at 10:00 a.m. for 30 min while rats were weighed; bedding was changed as necessary, and food hoppers/water bottles were refilled. Grams of food consumed were converted to kcal consumed based on caloric content of the diet (S. Table 1). To control for the effects of differences in body mass on intake, daily energy intake was normalized to the body mass recorded at the start of that day. Energy intake was analyzed separately during the light and dark phase of the light cycle.

Body Temperature

Unpublished body temperature data obtained from rats used in the Anderson et al. [53] study were analyzed to determine whether reductions in energy expenditure could account for the increases in body mass [53]. At 4 months of age, rats were surgically implanted with iButton temperature sensors (ThermoChron, Sidney, Australia) into the intraperitoneal cavity under deep isoflurane anesthesia (5% for initiation, 2% for maintenance, O2 flow rate 1.5 L/min). The rats were given carprofen (5 mg/kg SC) prior to surgery and 24 h post-surgery. The iButtons were programmed to record temperatures starting ~ 2 weeks after implantation at 30-min increments with 0.0625°C precision, encased in histology-grade paraffin wax, and sterilized with ethylene oxide gas. After 2 weeks of recovery, half of the rats in each group were randomly selected and placed on the HFHS diet. After 11 weeks of recording (7–7.5 months of age), the rats were euthanized as described in Anderson et al. [53], the iButtons were retrieved, and the temperature data were extracted [53]. Temperature readings were binned by 30 min and aligned within ± 12 min to the zeitgebers of lights-on and lights-off (e.g., the 7 a.m. timepoint represents 6:48 a.m.–7:12 a.m.). The average measurement for each timepoint was taken across 8 weeks of recording.

Western Blot Analysis of iBAT

Western blot (Bio-Rad) was used to measure UCP1 protein expression in iBAT tissue collected from the rats in our previous study [53]. Interscapular brown adipose tissue was excised, carefully cleared of any white adipose or connective tissue, weighed, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored in -80 °C until further analyses. Western blots followed standard protocols as previously described. Protein was extracted from iBAT using radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer (RIPA) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich P8340) and phosphatase inhibitors (50 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate decahydrate, and 10 mM 2,3-bisphosphoglyceric acid). Total protein concentration was determined with a detergent compatible protein assay and a microplate reader (Synergy HT, BioTek). Proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Bio-Rad 10026933). Membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat dry milk for 1 h at room temperature followed by incubation in primary antibody overnight at 4°C. Membranes were then washed and incubated with secondary antibodies (Mouse-JL515035003 or Rabbit-CS7074S) at room temperature for 1 h. Protein expression was visualized using the Bio-Rad ChemiDoc Imaging System. UCP1 band density was normalized to total lane protein (trichloroethanol, Sigma-Aldrich T54801). The total amount of UCP1 was calculated as the UCP1 protein per microgram of iBAT protein multiplied by the total amount of protein present in the iBAT (see S. Table 3) [62, 63].

EchoMRI

A separate group of rats (~ 4.5 months old) was matched for body weight within each genotype and sex and assigned to either continue standard chow (S. Table 1, LabDiet 5001, Richmond, IN) or was switched to the HFHS diet (S. Table 1, Research Diets D12451, New Brunswick, NJ) and weighed weekly. After 8 weeks on diet, body composition was assessed using an EchoMRI-700 Whole Body Analyzer (EchoMRI™, Houston, TX; Fig. 3a). Unanesthetized rats were guided into a ventilated plastic tube that was then inserted into the machine. Fat mass and lean body mass were averaged from duplicate 3-min readings. Measurements were calibrated to two known standard volumes of vegetable oil that were established through triplicate 3-min readings.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Female TgF344-AD rats accrue more body mass than WT females, especially on the HFHS diet. a Experimental timeline. b Body mass was elevated in female TgF344-AD rats fed the chow or HFHS diet (WT-Chow: n = 5, WT-HFHS: n = 5, Tg-Chow: n = 11, Tg-HFHS: n = 11). c This effect was not seen in male TgF344-AD rats (WT-Chow: n = 9, WT-HFHS: n = 7, Tg-Chow: n = 7, Tg-HFHS: n = 8). d Female TgF344-AD rats weighed more than WT rats at the end of the experiment (WT-Chow: n = 5, WT-HFHS: n = 5, Tg-Chow: n = 10, Tg-HFHS: n = 11), e but male TgF344-AD rats did not (WT-Chow: n = 9, WT-HFHS: n = 7, Tg-Chow: n = 8, Tg-HFHS: n = 8). f Chow-fed TgF344-AD rats had a lower lean-to-fat mass ratio than their WT counterparts regardless of sex (male: WT-Chow: n = 9, WT-HFHS: n = 7, Tg-Chow: n = 8, Tg-HFHS: n = 8; female: WT-Chow: n = 5, WT-HFHS: n = 5, Tg-Chow: n = 11, Tg-HFHS: n = 12). WT = wild-type, Tg = TgF344-AD, HFHS = high-fat high-sugar diet, * = p < 0.05

Glucose Tolerance Test

Fasting glucose tolerance was assessed in a random subset of these rats after 9 weeks (~ 6.5 months of age) on the diet. Food was removed between 1 and 3 h after the start of the light cycle, and rats were brought into the testing room to acclimate for 8 h ± 30 min prior to the first blood glucose collection. A small puncture was made on the tip of the tail using a disposable 28-gauge lancet (CVS Thin Lancets, CVS 235157), and a drop of blood was collected to determine baseline blood glucose levels using a glucose meter (CVS Advanced Glucose Meter 968874). Then, rats were given an injection of glucose (1.7 g/kg lean mass, IP) and returned to their home cages. Lean body mass from the EchoMRI conducted 1 week earlier was used to calculate dosing. Blood samples were collected 5, 10, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min following the injection by milking the tail, forcing blood to displace the scab on the tail puncture. The first drop of blood was removed with a tissue, and the subsequent drop was sampled.

Tissue Collection

After 11 weeks on their diets (7–7.5 months of age), rats were euthanized with sodium pentobarbital (Euthasol, 150 mg/kg IP, Virbac VINV-CIII-0001). At this age, TgF344-AD rats are considered to be in the prodromal stage of AD development [37, 44, 64]. In support, we have shown previously that TgF344-AD rats fed the chow diet and WT rats fed the HFHS diet for the same 11-week period do not demonstrate memory deficits and, importantly, that TgF344-AD rats fed the HFHS diet for this 11-week period are significantly impaired. These findings suggest that the HFHS diet accelerated AD progression toward the clinical period [53]. The distance from the nose to the anus was measured to determine body length. iBAT, liver, heart, kidneys, and adrenal glands were harvested and weighed. Brains were extracted from the skull, the hypothalamus was gross-dissected, and then the brain was hemisected. The cortex was separated from the hippocampus, midbrain, thalamus, and striatum, and then, the olfactory bulb, olfactory tubercle, and a minuscule portion of frontal cortex were removed. The hypothalamus and remaining cortex were frozen on dry ice and stored at − 80 °C for further analyses.

ELISA Analysis of Soluble Aβ

The hypothalamic samples were suspended in 20 volumes and the cortical samples in 10 volumes of cell lysis buffer (10 × complete cell lysis buffer diluted to 1 ×, Cell Signaling Technology 9803) with 1% protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (HALT, Thermo Fisher 78440). The samples were then homogenized on wet ice with either 20 strokes of a mortar and pestle for hypothalamus or using a homogenizer (Pro Scientific 01–01200) for 10 s for cortex. After 30 min, the lysate was centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was then removed and frozen on dry ice until further analyses. Protein content was quantified by bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce BCA; Thermo Fisher 23225), and then, Aβ species were quantified using commercial ELISA kits selective for human Aβ42 (Thermo Fisher KHB3441) and human Aβ40 (Thermo Fisher KHB3481) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were quantified using a four-parameter logistical regression (myassays.com) and normalized to the total protein concentration of the sample.

Statistics

Experimenters were blinded to the condition of the animals and samples during data collection for in vivo and post-mortem assessments. The data were tested for normality, homogeneity of variance, and covariance using R. For data that were normally distributed, values exceeding 2.5 standard deviations from the mean were identified as outliers and excluded from subsequent statistical analyses (S. Table 2). For data that were not normally distributed, values exceeding 2.5 times the interquartile range (IQR) were identified as outliers. Since litter size influences a variety of metabolic and morphometric measures [65, 66], a mixed linear model (Kenward–Roger approximation) with litter size included as a random effect was used to analyze intake with sex, diet, genotype, and time as factors (S. Table 3). When there were main effects of sex or interactions between sex and genotype, diet, or time, a subsequent mixed linear model was conducted separately in males and females with only genotype and diet (or genotype, diet, and time) as fixed effects. Effect sizes are presented as partial eta squared (ηp2). Pairwise t-tests were conducted on estimated marginal means using Bonferroni correction. Total area under the curve (tAUC) was calculated for the length of the glucose tolerance test (GTT) using the trapezoidal rule [67]. The GTT was then broken down into 30-min segments, and an AUC was taken for each segment (0–30 min, 30–60 min, 60–90 min, 90–120 min). Significant interactions between genotype and diet within each sex were analyzed with Bonferroni-corrected pairwise t-tests. The Aβ ELISA data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA (sex × diet). Pearson’s correlations were computed between hypothalamic Aβ42 or Aβ40 and iBAT mass or tAUC and between iBAT UCP1 and terminal body mass. A probability of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Averages ± standard error of the mean (SEM) are plotted for the depicted groups.

Results

Male and Female TgF344-AD Rats Weigh More Than WT Rats Across Several Ages During the Prodromal Period

Rats were weighed weekly starting after weaning (P21–P24) to identify when the weight of TgF344-AD rats begins to diverge from their WT counterparts (Fig. 1a, b). Female TgF344-AD rats did not significantly differ from WT female rats during this period and planned post hoc comparisons failed to identify any genotypic effects (Fig. 1a). For males, there was a significant interaction between genotype and age (F1,567 = 19.79, p = 9.68 × 10–6, ηp2 = 0.02; Fig. 1b), such that male TgF344-AD rats had higher body mass than male WT rats (F1,567 = 56.17, p = 2.56 × 10–13, ηp2 = 0.09). Planned post hoc comparisons showed that, by week 5, male TgF344-AD rats weighed significantly more than male WT rats (t560.5 = 2.845, p = 0.032).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Male and female TgF344-AD rats weigh more than WT controls throughout most of the prodromal period. Male TgF344-AD rats begin to weigh more than WT controls during adolescence. a Female TgF344-AD rats did not display any differences during the first 10 weeks of life (n = 23–38/gp). b Male TgF344-AD rats began to weigh more than WT controls at 5 weeks of age (n = 23–38/gp). c Female TgF344-AD rats weighed significantly more than WT littermate controls at 28–32 and 36–40 weeks of age (n = 5–13/gp). d Male TgF344-AD rats weighed significantly more than WT littermate controls at 20–24 and 28–32 weeks of age (n = 2–12/gp). WT = wild-type, Tg = TgF344-AD, * = p < 0.05

A cross-sectional analysis of body mass from a different cohort of TgF344-AD rats of multiple ages showed that female and male TgF344-AD rats weighed more than their WT counterparts (female: F1,36 = 18.377, p = 0.000129, ηp2 = 0.338, Fig. 1c; male: F1,34 = 12.44, p = 0.0012, ηp2 = 0.268, Fig. 1d). Planned post hoc comparisons indicated that female TgF344-AD rats began to weigh significantly more than female WT rats at 28–32 weeks of age (t = 2.58, df = 34, p = 0.042); meanwhile, the male TgF344-AD rats already weighed significantly more than male WT rats by 20–24 weeks of age (t = 2.59, df = 36, p = 0.042).

Female TgF344-AD Rats Eat More Than WT Females

Energy intake was assessed in the rats from Fig. 1 when they were 4.5–5 months of age (Fig. 2a). The number of kcals consumed was divided by body mass to control for the effects of body mass on energy intake. There was a significant interaction between genotype and light cycle for energy intake (F1,229.6 = 11.09, p = 0.001, ηp2 = 0.05) such that female TgF344-AD rats consumed more calories than female WT rats during the dark cycle (F1,93.199 = 32.854, p = 1.215 × 10–7, ηp2 = 0.26; Fig. 2b; S. Figure 1a). This effect in females was accompanied by an interaction with diet (F1,93.001 = 4.754, p = 0.0318, ηp2 = 0.05), such that there was a greater mean difference in intake between WT and TgF344-AD rats on the HFHS diet (t229.91 = 3.98, p = 9.24 × 10–5) than on the chow diet. Female TgF344-AD rats did not have elevated intake during the light phase (Fig. 2c), and intake did not differ between male WT and TgF344-AD rats during either the light or dark portion of the cycle (Fig. 2d, e; S. Figure 1b).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Female TgF344-AD rats consume more calories than WT female rats during the dark phase of the light cycle. a Experimental timeline. b During the dark phase, female TgF344-AD rats consumed more of the control and HFHS diet than their WT counterparts (WT: n = 10, Tg: n = 5). c There were no significant effects of genotype on intake during the light phase in females (WT: n = 8, Tg: n = 5). d There were no significant effects of genotype on intake during the dark (WT: n = 4, Tg: n = 9) or e light in male rats (WT: n = 5, Tg: n = 10). WT = wild-type, Tg = TgF344-AD, HFHS = high-fat high-sugar diet, * = p < 0.05

Chronic Consumption of a HFHS Diet Produces Larger Increases in Body Weight in Female TgF344-AD Rats Than WT Rats

A different group of rats was placed on the HFHS diet for 11 weeks to assess the impact of chronic consumption of the diet (Fig. 3a). There was a significant main effect of genotype in female rats (F1,146.5 = 6.11, p = 1.46 × 10–2, ηp2 = 0.04; Fig. 3b), with TgF344-AD rats weighing more regardless of diet. Genotype did not affect body mass in male rats during the study period (Fig. 3c). Female (t = 2.47, p = 0.015) but not male TgF344-AD rats weighed more than WT rats at the time of euthanasia (Fig. 3d, e). The higher body mass in female rats was not due to increased body size (S. Table 3).

Chow-Fed TgF344-AD Rats Have a Reduced Lean-to-Fat Mass Ratio Regardless of Sex

Quantitative magnetic resonance results showed that diet and genotype interacted (F1,56.01 = 4.22, p = 0.0447, ηp2 = 0.07) so that chow (t = 2.74, df = 53.47, p = 0.0333) but not HFHS diet–fed (t = 0.238, df = 56.95, p = 0.81) TgF344-AD rats had a lower lean-to-fat ratio than their WT counterparts regardless of sex. Irrespective of genotype, female rats had a higher lean-to-fat ratio than male rats (F1,56.28 = 9.75, p = 0.003, ηp2 = 0.15; Fig. 3f) and the HFHS diet reduced the lean-to-fat ratio in both sexes (male: F1,18.59 = 2.56, p = 2.56 × 10–10, ηp2 = 0.89; female: F1,28.17 = 69.03, p = 4.64 × 10–9, ηp2 = 0.71).

Regardless of sex, HFHS-fed rats had increased percent body fat (F1,56.79 = 237.31, p = 4.84 × 10–22, ηp2 = 0.81; S. Table 3) but there was no effect of genotype on adiposity (F1,56.80 = 0.71, p = 0.403, ηp2 = 0.01). HFHS-fed rats also had reduced percent lean mass (F1,54.26 = 156.92, p = 3.70 × 10–18, ηp2 = 0.74; S. Table 3). The impact of diet on percent lean mass depended on sex (F1,56 = 6.42, p = 0.014, ηp2 = 0.10). Specifically, post hoc analyses showed that diet and genotype interacted in males (F1,23.16 = 7.41, p = 0.012, ηp2 = 0.31) but not females (F1,28.46 = 0.84, p = 0.368, ηp2 = 0.03) such that chow-fed TgF344-AD males had less percent lean mass than chow-fed WT males (t = 3.03, df = 22.15, p = 0.017).

Male TgF344-AD Rats Fed the HFHS Diet Have Impaired Glucose Regulation

Glucose administration significantly increased blood glucose concentrations in all groups (F1,486.41 = 17.46, p = 1.12 × 10–20, ηp2 = 0.20; Fig. 4a, b). There was a significant interaction between genotype and diet (F1,439.78 = 5.78, p = 0.017, ηp2 = 0.01) that was specific to males (F1,221.85 = 5.47, p = 0.02, ηp2 = 0.17; females F1,193.05 = 1.14, p = 0.287, ηp2 = 0.01). Specifically, glucose administration produced larger increases in blood glucose concentrations in HFHS-fed male TgF344-AD than WT males fed the same diet (t = 3.57, df = 230.53, p = 0.002; Fig. 4b). When the AUC was broken down into 30-min segments, there was an interaction between sex and genotype from 0 to 30 min (F1,31.8 = 4.61, p = 0.039, ηp2 = 0.13; Table 1) and main effects of sex from 30 to 60 min (F1,28.85 = 5.47, p = 0.026, ηp2 = 0.15; Table 1), 60–90 min (F1,20 = 17.89, p = 4.11×10-4, ηp2 = 0.47; Table 1), and 90–120 min (F1,20 = 14.73, p = 0.001, ηp2 = 0.42; Table 1). During the post-injection incline from 0 to 30 min (Table 1), diet and genotype interacted in male rats (F1,16.31 = 5.32, p = 0.035, ηp2 = 0.25). Specifically, HFHS-fed TgF344-AD rats had a greater AUC than their HFHS-fed WT counterparts (t = 3.51, df = 16.23, p = 0.011) and chow-fed TgF344-AD rats (t = 2.92, df = 16.52, p = 0.039). As blood sugar levels declined from 30 to 60 min (Table 1), diet and genotype interacted in male rats (F1,15.58 = 4.69, p = 0.046, ηp2 = 0.23), such that HFHS-fed male TgF344-AD rats had a greater AUC than male WT rats fed the same diet (t = 3.44, df = 15.58, p = 0.014). HFHS-fed male rats had a greater AUC than their male chow-fed counterparts as blood glucose levels continued to decline between 60 and 90 min (F1,9.91 = 7.16, p = 0.023, ηp2 = 0.42; Table 1) and 90–120 min (F1,10.16 = 7.68, p = 0.019, ηp2 = 0.43; Table 1). TgF344-AD males had a greater tAUC than WT males (F1,15.68 = 4.67, p = 0.047, ηp2 = 0.23; Fig. 4c), but genotype did not interact with HFHS diet to further increase AUC (F1,15.68 = 2.72, p = 0.119, ηp2 = 0.15).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Male but not female TgF344-AD rats have disrupted glucose homeostasis. a Female rats (6.3–7 months) did not exhibit diet- or genotype-induced disruptions in glucose regulation (WT-Chow: n = 3, WT-HFHS: n = 5, Tg-Chow: n = 4, Tg-HFHS: n = 5). b Glucose administration increased blood glucose levels more in male TgF344-AD rats fed the HFHS diet than any other group of male rats (WT-Chow: n = 6, WT-HFHS: n = 4, Tg-Chow: n = 6, Tg-HFHS: n = 7). c Male TgF344-AD rats had elevated tAUC (male: WT-Chow: n = 6, WT-HFHS: n = 4, Tg-Chow: n = 6, Tg-HFHS: n = 7; female: WT-Chow: n = 3, WT-HFHS: n = 5, Tg-Chow: n = 3, Tg-HFHS: n = 5). WT = wild-type, Tg = TgF344-AD, HFHS = high-fat high-sugar diet, * = p < 0.05

Table 1.

Fasting glucose and glucose tolerance test

Female
Chow HFHS Significant effects
WT Tg WT Tg
Fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) 151.25 ± 0.95 153.33 ± 5 160.2 ± 6.44 160.43 ± 8.83 a
0–30min AUC (min × mg/dL) 7064.17 ± 688.44 6848.33 ± 351.11 6734.5 ± 482.69 6719.5 ± 65.72 b
30–60 min 6825 ± 356.34 6577.5 ± 256.14 6073.5 ± 306.31 6432 ± 115.16 b
60–90 min 5480 ± 135.37 5095 ± 114.35 5397 ± 216.15 5616 ± 130.65
90–120 min 5195 ± 108.28 4780 ± 21.79 5097 ± 279.31 5210 ± 5
Male
Fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) 149.71 ± 0.68 149.57 ± 3.68 170.2 ± 5.44 156.29 ± 4.96 a
0–30min AUC (min × mg/dL) 6738.08 ± 258.82 6927.5 ± 320.79 6531.25 ± 67.15 7976.25 ± 192.39 b, c
30–60 min 6580 ± 271.6 6893.75 ± 316.27 6510 ± 225.94 8053.75 ± 232.75 b, c
60–90 min 5847.5 ± 174.65 6907.5 ± 234.7 6153.75 ± 191.15 6887.14 ± 210.77 d
90–120 min 5375 ± 174.01 5462.5 ± 201.52 5831.25 ± 191.64 6261.43 ± 165.74 d

Effects: a: Significant main effect of Diet regardless of sex (p < .05); b: Significant interaction between sex and genotype (p < .05); c: Significant interaction between Diet and Genotype in males (p < .05); d: Significant effect of HFHS diet in males (p < .05).

Male WT-Chow: n = 6–7, Tg-Chow: n = 6–7, WT-HFHS: n =4–6, Tg-HFHS: n = 7–8; Female: WT-Chow: n = 3–4, Tg-Chow: n =3–9, WT-HFHS: n = 5, Tg-HFHS: n = 5–10

Female TgF344-AD rats had comparable AUC to their WT counterparts from 0 to 30 min (F1,10.21 = 1.75, p = 0.215, ηp2 = 0.15; Table 1), 30–60 min (F1,12.06 = 2.48, p = 0.141, ηp2 = 0.17; Table 1), 60–90 min (F1,12.82 = 0.001, p = 0.973, ηp2 = 9.25×10-5; Table 1), and 90–120 min (F1,12.82 = 0.18, p = 0.675, ηp2 = 0.01; Table 1). There was no effect of genotype (F1,146.02 = 0.417, p = 0.519, ηp2 = 0.00285) on blood glucose concentrations or on tAUC in female rats (Fig. 4c). There was no significant effect of genotype on the baseline blood glucose concentrations after the 8-h fast (F1,31.5 = 0.1, p = 0.754, ηp2 = 0.02; Table 1).

iBAT and Adrenal Gland Mass Are Reduced in Female TgF344-AD Rats

iBAT mass was reduced in 7-month-old female TgF344-AD rats. Sex and genotype significantly interacted to impact iBAT mass (F1,51.74 = 12.35, p = 9.25 × 10–4, ηp2 = 0.19; Fig. 5a) such that female TgF344-AD rats had reduced iBAT mass compared to WT females (F1,26.87 = 13.59, p = 0.001, ηp2 = 0.34). The decline was specific to females as iBAT depots in male WT and TgF344-AD rats were comparable (F1,23.14 = 0.88, p = 0.358, ηp2 = 0.04).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

iBAT and adrenal gland mass are reduced in TgF344-AD females regardless of diet; soluble human Aβ40 and Aβ42 are expressed in the hypothalamus of prodromal TgF344-AD rats. a Female TgF344-AD rats had less iBAT mass than female WT rats regardless of diet (male: WT-Chow: n = 8, WT-HFHS: n = 7, Tg-Chow: n = 8, Tg-HFHS: n = 8; female: WT-Chow: n = 5, WT-HFHS: n = 5, Tg-Chow: n = 11, Tg-HFHS: n = 12). b Female TgF344-AD rats had reduced adrenal gland mass. HFHS diet increased adrenal mass in females and reduced it in males (male: WT-Chow: n = 8, WT-HFHS: n = 7, Tg-Chow: n = 8, Tg-HFHS: n = 8; female: WT-Chow: n = 5, WT-HFHS: n = 5, Tg-Chow: n = 11, Tg-HFHS: n = 12). c Female TgF344-AD rats (6.8–7.3 months) had more Aβ40 in the hypothalamus than male rats (male: Tg-Chow: n = 6, Tg-HFHS: n = 5; female Tg-Chow: n = 8, Tg-HFHS: n = 9). d There was a strong trend for HFHS diet–induced increases in hypothalamic Aβ42 in male and female Tg rats (male: Tg-Chow: n = 4, Tg-HFHS: n = 3; female Tg-Chow: n = 5, Tg-HFHS: n = 9). e iBAT mass and hypothalamic Aβ42 were positively correlated in female TgF344-AD rats (male: n = 7; female: n = 14). f There was a positive association between tAUC and hypothalamic Aβ42 in male TgF344-AD rats (male: n = 6; female: n = 8). WT = wild-type, Tg = TgF344-AD, HFHS = high-fat high-sugar diet, * = p < 0.05

There was a significant interaction between sex and diet (F1,52.25 = 12.45, p = 8.75 × 10–4, ηp2 = 0.19) and between sex and genotype (F1,54.08 = 5.26, p = 0.026, ηp2 = 0.09) on adrenal gland mass (Fig. 5b). Specifically, female TgF344-AD rats had lighter adrenal glands than their WT counterparts (F1,27.94 = 6.73, p = 0.015, ηp2 = 0.19), an effect that was not observed in males (F1,21.79 = 1.58, p = 0.223, ηp2 = 0.07). There was no impact of genotype on the mass of the heart (F1,51.99 = 1.02, p = 0.316, ηp2 = 0.02; S. Table 3), liver (F1,56.94 = 2.08, p = 0.155, ηp2 = 0.04; S. Table 3), or kidneys (F1,50.85 = 1.15, p = 0.289, ηp2 = 0.02; S. Table 3).

Soluble Aβ Is Detectable in the Hypothalamus of TgF344-AD Rats During the Prodromal Phase; Hypothalamic, but Not Cortical, Aβ42 Correlates with iBAT Mass in Females and Glucose Dysregulation in Males

Soluble human Aβ40 and Aβ42 were measured in the hypothalamus of 7-month-old TgF344-AD rats after 11 weeks on the diet (Fig. 3a). In a pilot experiment, we could not detect human Aβ40 and Aβ42 in WT rats, confirming that the human Aβ assays did not cross-react with endogenous amyloid species (n = 4, data not shown). Female TgF344-AD rats had more soluble Aβ40 (F1,25 = 8.423, p = 0.008, ηp2 = 0.26; Fig. 5c) than males but they did not differ in Aβ42 levels (F1,25 = 0.181, p = 0.676, ηp2 = 0.01; Fig. 5d). The HFHS diet did not affect Aβ40 levels in male or female TgF344-AD rats (male: F1,9 = 0.167, p = 0.692, ηp2 = 0.018; female: F1,16 = 1.869, p = 0.19, ηp2 = 0.105). Hypothalamic soluble Aβ42 was undetectable in 50% of male TgF344-AD rats (4 chow, 3 HFHS) and 25% of female TgF344-AD rats (2 chow, 2 HFHS; no significant differences between sexes χ2 = 1.0772, df = 1, p = 0.2993, V = 0.189). However, there was a strong trend for the HFHS diet to increase hypothalamic Aβ42 in TgF344-AD rats (F1,17 = 4.106, p = 0.059, ηp2 = 0.195; Fig. 5d).

As we found evidence of iBAT dysregulation in female TgF344-AD rats and disturbed glucose regulation in male TgF344-AD rats, we sought to determine whether hypothalamic Aβ42 and/or Aβ40 correlated with iBAT mass and the AUCs during the GTT. When collapsed by sex, iBAT mass correlated positively with hypothalamic Aβ42 (R2 = 0.483, p = 0.0213, αadj = 0.0167; Fig. 5e). When separated by sex, there was a positive correlation between iBAT mass and hypothalamic Aβ42 in female TgF344-AD rats (R2 = 0.441, p = 6.69 × 10–4, αadj = 0.0167) but not in male TgF344-AD rats (R2 = 0.002, p = 0.939, αadj = 0.0167). By contrast, hypothalamic Aβ42 correlated with AUC during the glucose tolerance test in male TgF344-AD rats (R2 = 0.801, p = 0.016, αadj = 0.0167; Fig. 5f) but not in female TgF344-AD rats (R2 = 0.041, p = 0.63, αadj = 0.0167) or when collapsed by sex (R2 = 0.268, p = 0.058, αadj = 0.0167). Hypothalamic Aβ40 did not correlate with iBAT, tAUC, or any of the AUC segments (data not shown).

To determine whether the positive correlation between hypothalamic soluble Aβ42 and peripheral metabolic disturbances extends to other brain regions, we measured soluble Aβ42 in the cortex from the same rats. The results indicated that cortical soluble Aβ42 did not correlate with iBAT mass (male: r2 = 0.005, p = 0.816, αadj = 0.0167; female: r2 = 0.054, p = 0.341, αadj = 0.0167; S. Figure 2a) nor tAUC (male: r2 = 0.076, p = 0.413, αadj = 0.0167; female: r2 = 0.016, p = 0.765, αadj = 0.0167; S. Figure 2b) in TgF344-AD rats of either sex. Neither the HFHS diet (F1,25 = 0.275, p = 0.604, ηp2 = 0.009) nor biological sex (F1,25 = 1.846, p = 0.184, ηp2 = 0.058) affected cortical soluble Aβ42 levels (S. Figure 2c).

TgF344-AD Rats Have Elevated Body Temperatures

Body temperature was assessed between 6 and 8 months of age [53]. There was a significant interaction between genotype and light cycle for females (F1,479 = 8.4789, p = 0.00376, ηp2 = 0.02), with female TgF344-AD rats exhibiting higher temperatures than female WT rats only during the dark phases (t21.99 = 2.49, p = 0.042; Fig. 6b; S. Figure 1c). For males, a main effect of genotype was observed (F1,25 = 24.31, p = 4.44 × 10–5, ηp2 = 0.53), such that male TgF344-AD rats had higher body temperatures than male WT rats in both the light and dark (t20.33 = 3.46, p = 0.0049; Fig. 3c; S. Figure 1d). A significant interaction between genotype and light cycle (F1,479 = 5.112, p = 0.024, ηp2 = 0.01) indicated that the temperature difference in the dark was greater than in the light in male TgF344-AD rats (S. Figure 1d).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Body temperature is increased, but iBAT mass and UCP1 levels are reduced in female TgF344-AD rats. a Experimental timeline. b Female TgF344-AD rats (5–7 months of age) had higher body temperatures than WT females during the dark phase of the light cycle (WT: n = 13, Tg: n = 13). c Male TgF344-AD rats had higher body temperatures than WT males during both the light and dark phase (WT: n = 15, Tg: n = 14). d iBAT mass was reduced in female TgF344-AD rats (WT-Chow: n = 4, WT-HFHS: n = 4, Tg-Chow: n = 3, Tg HFHS: n = 3) and e male TgF344-AD rats (WT-Chow: n = 4, WT-HFHS: n = 4, Tg-Chow: n = 4, Tg HFHS: n = 3). f Female TgF344-AD rats expressed less UCP1 in iBAT tissue than WT females (WT-Chow: n = 4, WT-HFHS: n = 4, Tg-Chow: n = 3, Tg HFHS: n = 3) while G male TgF344-AD rats expressed UCP1 levels comparable to WT rats (WT-Chow: n = 4, WT-HFHS: n = 4, Tg-Chow: n = 4, Tg HFHS: n = 3). WT = wild-type, Tg = TgF344-AD, HFHS = high-fat high-sugar diet, * = p < 0.05

TgF344-AD Rats Have Reduced iBAT Mass; Female TgF344-AD Rats Also Have Reduced UCP1

At 8.4 months of age, female and male TgF344-AD rats had reduced iBAT mass (F1,21 = 24.72, p = 0.000064, ηp2 = 0.541; Fig. 6d, e) compared to their WT counterparts. There was a significant interaction between genotype and sex for UCP1 expression (F1,20 = 11.18, p = 0.0032, ηp2 = 0.359; Fig. 6f, g). In females, a main effect of genotype was observed (F1,10 = 10.57, p = 0.0087, ηp2 = 0.514), such that TgF344-AD females on both diets exhibited reduced UCP1 expression (t = 3.252, p = 0.0087), whereas in males, there was a trend toward increased UCP1 in TgF344-AD rats (F1,11 = 4.227, p = 0.064, ηp2 = 0.278). A negative association between terminal body mass and UCP1 expression was found in female rats (r2 = 0.336, p = 0.0299, αadj = 0.025; S. Figure 1e), and a positive association between terminal body mass and UCP1 expression was found in male rats (r2 = 0.287, p = 0.0486, αadj = 0.025; S. Figure 1e).

Discussion

Collectively, the results of the present study show that peripheral energy homeostasis is disrupted in TgF344-AD rats and that the timing and profile of these changes depend on sex. Female but not male TgF344-AD rats display decreases in iBAT UCP1 levels, increased energy intake and body temperature during the dark phase, and HFHS diet–induced increases in body mass. Female TgF344-AD rats also exhibit decreases in iBAT mass at an earlier age than male TgF344-AD rats. Male TgF344-AD rats have increased body temperature during both the light and dark phase and only male TgF344-AD rats had HFHS diet–induced impairment of glucose clearance. Further, male TgF344-AD rats begin to outweigh their WT littermates during adolescence, at a younger age than female TgF344-AD rats. These increases in body mass persist for most of the prodromal period, particularly in female rats.

The present findings appear to be the first to show that soluble Aβ is present in the hypothalamus during the prodromal period in TgF344-AD rats. This finding is consistent with observations in AD patients showing that the hypothalamus displays amyloid plaques and undergoes neurodegeneration and atrophy during early AD [14, 57, 68] and with the finding that glucose metabolism is reduced in the hypothalamus of presymptomatic Tg2576 mice that also overexpress APP [69]. Our data also show that there is more soluble Aβ40 in the hypothalamus of female than male rats, although the consequences of these elevations are unclear. Interestingly, there was a trend suggesting that the HFHS diet increases hypothalamic soluble Aβ42 levels in TgF344-AD rats. There were also significant sex-specific positive correlations between hypothalamic Aβ42 and glucose dysregulation in TgF344-AD male rats and with increased iBAT mass in TgF344-AD females. By contrast, cortical soluble Aβ42 did not correlate with iBAT mass nor glucose AUC. Also, there was not a trend for the HFHS diet to increase cortical soluble Aβ42 as was observed in the hypothalamus.

Taken together, these findings show that the relationship between soluble Aβ42 and peripheral metabolic dysfunction is not global, raise the possibility that the association may be specific to the hypothalamus, and are consistent with the hypothesis that hypothalamic Aβ42 mediates the sex-dependent peripheral changes. The paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) controls sympathetic outflow to BAT and projects to the lateral hypothalamus and the arcuate nucleus, which are critical for the regulation of feeding behavior, BAT thermogenesis, and blood glucose regulation [70, 71]. Separate populations of neurons in the PVN mediate BAT thermogenesis vs. peripheral glucose homeostasis [72, 73]. Since the measures of soluble Aβ in the present study were obtained from the entire hypothalamus, additional research is needed to determine whether these sex differences in metabolic disturbances are associated with differences in the hypothalamic nuclei and specific neuronal subpopulations in female vs. male TgF344-AD rats.

Our novel findings that iBAT correlates positively with hypothalamic Aβ42 in female rats suggest that hypothalamic dysfunction may mediate the iBAT disturbances. As female TgF344-AD rats also exhibited reduced iBAT UCP1 expression, this association may be evidence of the whitening of the iBAT and its accumulation of excess lipids [74, 75]. Indeed, decreased UCP1 significantly contributes to whitening-associated morphological changes [76] and is considered the mechanism mediating whitening [77, 78]. Relatedly, intracerebroventricular infusions of Aβ oligomers induce hypothalamic inflammation that precedes glucose intolerance [79]. Collectively, these lines of evidence suggest that soluble Aβ oligomers may induce hypothalamic pathology to induce peripheral metabolic dysfunction. The coincidence of peripheral metabolic dysfunction with AD is well established, but the presentation of specific metabolic dysfunctions is heterogeneous in the patient population [80, 81]. Our findings suggest that elevated soluble Aβ may drive some of this heterogeneity by interacting with biological sex.

Our findings mechanistically add to the growing evidence indicating that energy homeostasis is disrupted in TgF344-AD rats in a sex-dependent manner [41, 82]. Our findings also raise the possibility that increased energy intake and decreased UCP1-mediated thermogenesis contribute to these increases in weight gain in female TgF344-AD rats. This likelihood is supported by the negative correlation between iBAT UCP1 levels and body weight in female rats that we observed. Our findings show further that glucose regulation was only impaired in male TgF344-AD rats fed the HFHS diet. Even though WT rats fed the HFHS diet had comparable body mass, adiposity, and lean-to-fat ratios, they did not have disturbed glucose tolerance. This finding is consistent with observations in humans showing that many obese individuals are metabolically healthy [83]. Given that the disturbed glucose regulation was seen in TgF344-AD but not WT rats and that the disturbed glucose tolerance correlated with hypothalamic Aβ42, these findings suggest hypothalamic Aβ42 increases susceptibility to HFHS diet–induced type II diabetes risk. Compared to metabolically healthy obese individuals, obese individuals with impaired glucose regulation have more visceral fat, dysfunctional expansion of adipocytes leading to lipid spillover into the pancreas, increased proinflammatory macrophages, decreased muscle insulin sensitivity, lower adiponectin levels [84, 85], and impaired mitochondrial function [86]. Additional research is needed to determine whether any of these factors contributed to the HFHS diet–induced glucose dysregulation in male TgF344-AD rats. The finding that glucose regulation was impaired in male but not female TgF344-AD rats fed the HFHS diet is consistent with research showing that females are resilient to the metabolic impact of obesity on glucose regulation [87–90] and that type II diabetes is more prevalent in human males than females [91, 92]. The relationship between sex and glucose regulation appears to be moderated, in part, by age. Although young women are resilient [93–96], older women appear to lose this resiliency, likely due to the loss of the protective effects of ovarian hormones [97–99]. These findings lead to the prediction that female TgF344-AD rats will develop glucose intolerance as they age. In support, others have shown that older (9 and 12 months old) female TgF344-AD rats fed chow have impaired glucose regulation [41].

The present finding that adrenal gland mass is decreased in female TgF344-AD rats is inconsistent with evidence indicating that the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis is overactivated in AD [100], given that HPA overactivation induces adrenal hyperplasia [101]. However, adrenal function has not been well studied during the transition from MCI to AD. It is therefore possible that preclinical or prodromal AD patients might display secondary or tertiary adrenal insufficiency before going on to develop HPA overactivation in later stages. Secondary and tertiary adrenal insufficiency is due to pituitary or hypothalamic dysfunction, respectively, which could reduce adrenal gland size [102].

The finding that TgF344-AD rats have higher body temperatures than WT rats is consistent with evidence showing that AD patients have increased core body temperature [103]. The increases we observed are not likely due to elevated activity levels, because home cage activity and locomotor movement and speed are not increased in male or female TgF344-AD rats across a wide range of ages and measures [25, 26, 59, 104]. The elevations in body temperature during the dark phase observed in female TgF344-AD rats are surprising because UCP1 levels were reduced in these rats. We speculate that this increase that is restricted to the dark phase is due to their elevated energy intake that also occurred only during the dark and the associated increase in activity and digestion-induced thermogenesis. Given that male TgF344-AD rats did not consume more food, did not have significant reductions in UCP1, and that UCP1 was positively associated with terminal body mass, the processes that contributed to their elevated body temperatures remain unclear. One possibility is that UCP1-independent mechanisms of thermogenesis mediate these increases in male TgF344-AD rats, such as UCP3-related nonshivering thermogenesis in skeletal muscle [53, 105].

Our findings raise the intriguing possibility that metabolic disturbances are an early symptom of AD. In humans, AD development typically starts in midlife, and metabolic disturbances during this period, such as obesity, are associated with increased AD risk [106, 107]. We and others have shown that obesity exacerbates AD-like pathology [108–110]. For example, we recently showed that feeding TgF344-AD rats the HFHS diet during the early prodromal period negatively impacts AD trajectory [53]. Collectively, that evidence suggests that obesity and associated comorbid conditions during early AD increase AD risk. We speculate that obesity is a risk factor for AD, at least in part, because it is an early symptom of AD.

There are limitations to the present research that should be addressed in future research. For example, our analysis of AD neuropathology was limited to soluble forms of Aβ, and future studies should examine whether the HFHS diet promotes the production and deposition of ptau. Although the correlations we observed between hypothalamic Aβ42 and peripheral metabolic dysfunction suggest that increases in hypothalamic Aβ42 induce disturbances in BAT and glucose regulation, future work should manipulate hypothalamic Aβ42 to assess causality. The present study does not reveal the causes of the sex-dependent increases in body temperature that were observed in male and female TgF344-AD rats. It would be interesting, for instance, to determine whether fasting rats during the onset of the dark cycle prevents the temperature increases seen in the dark in female TgF344-AD rats, which would be consistent with our hypothesis that the increased body temperature is due to heightened intake. Further, future studies could employ indirect calorimetry, which is the gold standard for assessing energy expenditure [111, 112], to determine whether increases in body temperature are associated with increased energy expenditure or conversely whether the increases in body mass and decreases in lean-to-fat ratios are linked to decreased expenditure. Finally, we note that whether the male or female TgF344-AD rats weigh more than WT rats seems to vary within and across laboratories [37, 41, 45, 51, 82, 113–116]. For instance, our findings show that TgF344-AD males who are 4–7 months old weigh more than WT rats (Fig. 1d) and yet in another cohort we do not observe any differences in body mass at a similar age (Fig. 3c). Even when male TgF344-AD rats do not weigh more than WT rats, they do have lower lean-to-fat ratio (see Fig. 3c vs. 3f), which is more predictive of health than lean or fat or body mass alone [117–119].

In summary, we used a multisystem approach to provide a comprehensive analysis of peripheral energy balance in the context of early hypothalamic amyloid accumulation. We show that energy homeostasis is disrupted in TgF344-AD rats during early AD development in a sex-dependent manner and that some of these changes are associated with hypothalamic Aβ42 levels. The presence of sex-dependent associations between hypothalamic but not cortical Aβ42 levels and measures of disrupted energy homeostasis highlights the need for future research into hypothalamic dysfunction in AD with mixed-sex study designs and raises the possibility that the occurrence of early disruptions of energy homeostasis may serve as biomarkers of AD or increased AD risk. By reframing metabolic dysfunction as a potential early, sex-influenced consequence of amyloid-driven hypothalamic pathology, we provide mechanistic leads with direct relevance to targeted metabolic interventions in neurodegenerative disease.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1 (284.6KB, png)

Supplementary Material 1 (PNG 284 KB)

ESM 2 (200.5KB, png)

Supplementary Material 2 (PNG 200 KB)

ESM3 (20.4KB, docx)

(DOCX 20.4 KB)

ESM4 (29.4KB, docx)

(DOCX 29.3 KB)

ESM5 (25.7KB, docx)

(DOCX 25.7 KB)

Acknowledgements

We thank Trenton Buckner, Kam-Ren Douglas, Kate Halfon, Harish Koyya, Hanh “Vivian” Ngo Vu, and Usama Zafar for their technical assistance.

Author Contribution

Caleb Levine: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. Cameron Caggiano: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. Thea Anderson: Conceptualization, Investigation. Writing – review and editing. Michael Kelberman: Investigation, Data Curation, Writing – review and editing. David Weinshenker: Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. Hannah Lail: Formal analysis, investigation. Desiree Wanders: Formal analysis, Resources, Writing – review and editing, Supervision Debra Bangasser: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—Review & Editing. Scott Kanoski: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—Review & Editing. & Marise B. Parent: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Funding

This work was supported by GSU 2CI Neurogenomics Fellowships (to CML and CC), National Institutes of Health: AG069502 & AG066511 (to MAK), AG062581 (to DW), R01DA049837, R01DA056534, R34DA061483, & National Science Foundation IOS-2313253 (to DAB), R01DK123423 (to SEK), RO1DK114700 (to MBP), and a GSU Brains & Behavior Program Seed Grant (to MBP & DB).

Data Availability

Data supporting the findings can be found online at Mendeley’s Data Repository with the 10.17632/rthpp2ktb7.1

Declarations

Ethics Approval

All animal procedures were approved by the Georgia State University IACUC (Protocol A24036), carried out in accordance with NIH (National Research Council) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and in compliance with ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines.

Competing Interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial conflicts of interest to disclose.

Footnotes

Caleb M. Levine and Cameron Caggiano are co-first authors.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.2024 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures (2024). Alzheimers Dement 20 (5):3708–3821. 10.1002/alz.13809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Gustavsson A, Norton N, Fast T, Frolich L, Georges J, Holzapfel D, Kirabali T, Krolak-Salmon P, et al. (2023) Global estimates on the number of persons across the Alzheimer’s disease continuum. Alzheimers Dement 19(2):658–670. 10.1002/alz.12694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Boxer AL, Sperling R (2023) Accelerating Alzheimer’s therapeutic development: the past and future of clinical trials. Cell 186(22):4757–4772. 10.1016/j.cell.2023.09.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Buccellato FR, D’Anca M, Tartaglia GM, Del Fabbro M, Scarpini E, Galimberti D (2023) Treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: beyond symptomatic therapies. Int J Mol Sci. 10.3390/ijms241813900 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Selkoe DJ, Hardy J (2016) The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease at 25 years. EMBO Mol Med 8(6):595–608. 10.15252/emmm.201606210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hanseeuw BJ, Betensky RA, Jacobs HIL, Schultz AP, Sepulcre J, Becker JA, Cosio DMO, Farrell M, et al. (2019) Association of amyloid and tau with cognition in preclinical Alzheimer disease: a longitudinal study. JAMA Neurol 76(8):915–924. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vermunt L, Sikkes SAM, van den Hout A, Handels R, Bos I, van der Flier WM, Kern S, Ousset PJ, Maruff P, Skoog I, Verhey FRJ, Freund-Levi Y, Tsolaki M, Wallin AK, Olde Rikkert M, Soininen H, Spiru L, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Scheltens P, Muniz-Terrera G, Visser PJ, Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging I, Group AR, groups IDs (2019) Duration of preclinical, prodromal, and dementia stages of Alzheimer’s disease in relation to age, sex, and APOE genotype. Alzheimers Dement 15(7):888–898. 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dubois B, Hampel H, Feldman HH, Scheltens P, Aisen P, Andrieu S, Bakardjian H, Benali H, et al. (2016) Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: definition, natural history, and diagnostic criteria. Alzheimers Dement 12(3):292–323. 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.02.002. (Proceedings of the Meeting of the International Working G, the American Alzheimer’s Association on The Preclinical State of AD, July, Washington Dc USA) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bateman RJ, Xiong C, Benzinger TL, Fagan AM, Goate A, Fox NC, Marcus DS, Cairns NJ, et al. (2012) Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 367(9):795–804. 10.1056/NEJMoa1202753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fagan AM, Xiong C, Jasielec MS, Bateman RJ, Goate AM, Benzinger TL, Ghetti B, Martins RN, et al. (2014) Longitudinal change in CSF biomarkers in autosomal-dominant Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Transl Med 6(226):226ra230. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Buchhave P, Minthon L, Zetterberg H, Wallin AK, Blennow K, Hansson O (2012) Cerebrospinal fluid levels of beta-amyloid 1–42, but not of tau, are fully changed already 5 to 10 years before the onset of Alzheimer dementia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 69(1):98–106. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Bennett DA, Craft S, Fagan AM, Iwatsubo T, Jack CR Jr, et al. (2011) Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 7(3):280–292. 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vos SJ, Xiong C, Visser PJ, Jasielec MS, Hassenstab J, Grant EA, Cairns NJ, Morris JC, et al. (2013) Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease and its outcome: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Neurol 12(10):957–965. 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70194-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chuang YF, An Y, Bilgel M, Wong DF, Troncoso JC, O’Brien RJ, Breitner JC, Ferruci L, et al. (2016) Midlife adiposity predicts earlier onset of Alzheimer’s dementia, neuropathology and presymptomatic cerebral amyloid accumulation. Mol Psychiatry 21(7):910–915. 10.1038/mp.2015.129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pugazhenthi S, Qin L, Reddy PH (2017) Common neurodegenerative pathways in obesity, diabetes, and Alzheimer’s disease. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease 1863(5):1037–1045. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.04.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Alford S, Patel D, Perakakis N, Mantzoros CS (2018) Obesity as a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease: weighing the evidence. Obes Rev 19(2):269–280. 10.1111/obr.12629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Boutari C, Mantzoros CS (2022) A 2022 update on the epidemiology of obesity and a call to action: as its twin COVID-19 pandemic appears to be receding, the obesity and dysmetabolism pandemic continues to rage on. Metabolism 133:155217. 10.1016/j.metabol.2022.155217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Whitmer RA, Gunderson EP, Quesenberry CP Jr, Zhou J, Yaffe K (2007) Body mass index in midlife and risk of Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia. Curr Alzheimer Res 4(2):103–109. 10.2174/156720507780362047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Beydoun MA, Lhotsky A, Wang Y, Dal Forno G, An Y, Metter EJ, Ferrucci L, O’Brien R, et al. (2008) Association of adiposity status and changes in early to mid-adulthood with incidence of Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Epidemiol 168(10):1179–1189. 10.1093/aje/kwn229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hassing LB, Dahl AK, Thorvaldsson V, Berg S, Gatz M, Pedersen NL, Johansson B (2009) Overweight in midlife and risk of dementia: a 40-year follow-up study. Int J Obes (Lond) 33(8):893–898. 10.1038/ijo.2009.104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kivipelto M, Ngandu T, Fratiglioni L, Viitanen M, Kareholt I, Winblad B, Helkala EL, Tuomilehto J, et al. (2005) Obesity and vascular risk factors at midlife and the risk of dementia and Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 62(10):1556–1560. 10.1001/archneur.62.10.1556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pedditzi E, Peters R, Beckett N (2016) The risk of overweight/obesity in mid-life and late life for the development of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Age Ageing 45(1):14–21. 10.1093/ageing/afv151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tolppanen AM, Ngandu T, Kareholt I, Laatikainen T, Rusanen M, Soininen H, Kivipelto M (2014) Midlife and late-life body mass index and late-life dementia: results from a prospective population-based cohort. J Alzheimers Dis 38(1):201–209. 10.3233/JAD-130698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jack CR Jr, Andrews JS, Beach TG, Buracchio T, Dunn B, Graf A, Hansson O, Ho C, et al. (2024) Revised criteria for diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer’s disease: Alzheimer’s Association Workgroup. Alzheimers Dement 20(8):5143–5169. 10.1002/alz.13859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cohen RM, Rezai-Zadeh K, Weitz TM, Rentsendorj A, Gate D, Spivak I, Bholat Y, Vasilevko V, et al. (2013) A transgenic Alzheimer rat with plaques, tau pathology, behavioral impairment, oligomeric abeta, and frank neuronal loss. J Neurosci 33(15):6245–6256. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3672-12.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rorabaugh JM, Chalermpalanupap T, Botz-Zapp CA, Fu VM, Lembeck NA, Cohen RM, Weinshenker D (2017) Chemogenetic locus coeruleus activation restores reversal learning in a rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 140(11):3023–3038. 10.1093/brain/awx232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bazzigaluppi P, Beckett TL, Koletar MM, Lai AY, Joo IL, Brown ME, Carlen PL, McLaurin J, et al. (2018) Early-stage attenuation of phase-amplitude coupling in the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex in a transgenic rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem 144(5):669–679. 10.1111/jnc.14136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hernandez CM, McCuiston MA, Davis K, Halls Y, Carcamo Dal Zotto JP, Jackson NL, Dobrunz LE, King PH, et al. (2024) In a circuit necessary for cognition and emotional affect, Alzheimer’s-like pathology associates with neuroinflammation, cognitive and motivational deficits in the young adult TgF344-AD rat. Brain Behav Immun Health 39:100798. 10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Morrone CD, Bazzigaluppi P, Beckett TL, Hill ME, Koletar MM, Stefanovic B, McLaurin J (2020) Regional differences in Alzheimer’s disease pathology confound behavioural rescue after amyloid-beta attenuation. Brain 143(1):359–373. 10.1093/brain/awz371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wu C, Yang L, Li Y, Dong Y, Yang B, Tucker LD, Zong X, Zhang Q (2020) Effects of exercise training on anxious-depressive-like behavior in Alzheimer rat. Med Sci Sports Exerc 52(7):1456–1469. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.La Joie R, Visani AV, Baker SL, Brown JA, Bourakova V, Cha J, Chaudhary K, Edwards L, et al. (2020) Prospective longitudinal atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease correlates with the intensity and topography of baseline tau-PET. Sci Transl Med. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau5732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ossenkoppele R, Smith R, Mattsson-Carlgren N, Groot C, Leuzy A, Strandberg O, Palmqvist S, Olsson T, et al. (2021) Accuracy of tau positron emission tomography as a prognostic marker in preclinical and prodromal Alzheimer disease: a head-to-head comparison against amyloid positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA Neurol 78(8):961–971. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.1858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pentkowski NS, Berkowitz LE, Thompson SM, Drake EN, Olguin CR, Clark BJ (2018) Anxiety-like behavior as an early endophenotype in the TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 61:169–176. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.09.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mvd B, Heymans L, Toen D, Adhikari MA, Audekerke JV, Verschuuren M, Pintelon I, Vos WHD, et al. (2025) Partial normalization of hippocampal oscillatory activity during sleep in TgF344-AD rats coincides with increased cholinergic synapses at early-plaque stage of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun 13(1):96. 10.1186/s40478-025-02016-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fowler CF, Goerzen D, Devenyi GA, Madularu D, Chakravarty MM, Near J (2022) Neurochemical and cognitive changes precede structural abnormalities in the TgF344-AD rat model. Brain Commun. 10.1093/braincomms/fcac072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Berkowitz LE, Harvey RE, Drake E, Thompson SM, Clark BJ (2018) Progressive impairment of directional and spatially precise trajectories by TgF344-Alzheimer’s disease rats in the Morris Water Task. Sci Rep 8(1):16153. 10.1038/s41598-018-34368-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bernaud VE, Bulen HL, Peña VL, Koebele SV, Northup-Smith SN, Manzo AA, Valenzuela Sanchez M, Opachich Z, et al. (2022) Task-dependent learning and memory deficits in the TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer’s disease: three key timepoints through middle-age in females. Sci Rep 12(1):14596. 10.1038/s41598-022-18415-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Futácsi A, Rusznák K, Szarka G, Völgyi B, Wiborg O, Czéh B (2025) Quantification and correlation of amyloid-β plaque load, glial activation, GABAergic interneuron numbers, and cognitive decline in the young TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1542229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sloand TJ, Dunham BP, Niedringhaus M, West EA (2026) Aberrant medial prefrontal cortex activity and flexible behavior in the TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 46(6):e1387252026. 10.1523/jneurosci.1387-25.2026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hernandez CM, McCuiston MA, Davis K, Halls Y, Carcamo Dal Zotto JP, Jackson NL, Dobrunz LE, King PH, et al. (2024) In a circuit necessary for cognition and emotional affect, Alzheimer’s-like pathology associates with neuroinflammation, cognitive and motivational deficits in the young adult TgF344-AD rat. Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health 39:100798. 10.1016/j.bbih.2024.10079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Srivastava H, Lasher AT, Nagarajan A, Sun LY (2023) Sexual dimorphism in the peripheral metabolic homeostasis and behavior in the TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Cell 22(7):e13854. 10.1111/acel.13854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Saré RM, Cooke SK, Krych L, Zerfas PM, Cohen RM, Smith CB (2020) Behavioral phenotype in the TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Neurosci 14:601. 10.3389/fnins.2020.00601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Morrone CD, Bazzigaluppi P, Beckett TL, Hill ME, Koletar MM, Stefanovic B, McLaurin J (2020) Regional differences in Alzheimer’s disease pathology confound behavioural rescue after amyloid-β attenuation. Brain 143(1):359–373. 10.1093/brain/awz371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sagalajev B, Lennartz L, Vieth L, Gunawan CT, Neumaier B, Drzezga A, Visser-Vandewalle V, Endepols H, et al. (2023) TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer’s disease: spatial disorientation and asymmetry in hemispheric neurodegeneration. J Alzheimers Dis Rep 7(1):1085–1094. 10.3233/ADR-230038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ostlund SB, Chen G, Kosheleff A, Lueptow LM, Zhuravka I, Frautschy SA, Lam HA, Maidment NT (2025) Early emergence of motivational and hedonic feeding deficits in the TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1572956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bentley JH, Broussard JI (2024) Multimodal gamma stimulation improves activity but not memory in aged TgF344-AD rats. Curr Alzheimer Res 20(11):769–777. 10.2174/0115672050281956240228075849 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bac B, Hicheri C, Weiss C, Buell A, Vilcek N, Spaeni C, Geula C, Savas JN, et al. (2023) The TgF344-AD rat: behavioral and proteomic changes associated with aging and protein expression in a transgenic rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 123:98–110. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2022.12.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cohen RM, Rezai-Zadeh K, Weitz TM, Rentsendorj A, Gate D, Spivak I, Bholat Y, Vasilevko V, et al. (2013) A transgenic Alzheimer rat with plaques, tau pathology, behavioral impairment, oligomeric Aβ, and frank neuronal loss. J Neurosci 33(15):6245–6256. 10.1523/jneurosci.3672-12.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hernandez CM, Jackson NL, Hernandez AR, McMahon LL (2022) Impairments in fear extinction memory and basolateral amygdala plasticity in the TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer’s disease are distinct from nonpathological aging. eNeuro. 10.1523/ENEURO.0181-22.2022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bernaud VE, Bulen HL, Pena VL, Koebele SV, Northup-Smith SN, Manzo AA, Valenzuela Sanchez M, Opachich Z, et al. (2022) Task-dependent learning and memory deficits in the TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer’s disease: three key timepoints through middle-age in females. Sci Rep 12(1):14596. 10.1038/s41598-022-18415-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rutkowsky JM, Roland Z, Valenzuela A, Nguyen AB, Park HH, Six N, Dursun I, Kim K, et al. (2024) The impact of continuous and intermittent ketogenic diets on cognitive behavior, motor function, and blood lipids in TgF344-AD rats. Aging (Albany NY) 16(7):5811–5828. 10.18632/aging.205741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Almanza DLV, Koletar MM, Lai AY, Lam WW, Joo L, Hill ME, Stanisz GJ, McLaurin J, et al. (2024) High caloric intake improves neuronal metabolism and functional hyperemia in a rat model of early AD pathology. Theranostics 14(19):7405–7423. 10.7150/thno.98793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wanders D, Burk DH, Cortez CC, Van NT, Stone KP, Baker M, Mendoza T, Mynatt RL, Gettys TW (2015) UCP1 is an essential mediator of the effects of methionine restriction on energy balance but not insulin sensitivity. FASEB J 29(6):2603–2615. 10.1096/fj.14-270348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Elmquist JK, Elias CF, Saper CB (1999) From lesions to leptin: hypothalamic control of food intake and body weight. Neuron 22(2):221–232. 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81084-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Timper K, Bruning JC (2017) Hypothalamic circuits regulating appetite and energy homeostasis: pathways to obesity. Dis Model Mech 10(6):679–689. 10.1242/dmm.026609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hiller AJ, Ishii M (2018) Disorders of body weight, sleep and circadian rhythm as manifestations of hypothalamic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Cell Neurosci 12:471. 10.3389/fncel.2018.00471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Laurell AA, Shah SN, Rahmati M, O’Brien JT, Underwood BR (2025) Hypothalamic imaging in Alzheimer’s disease and Lewy body dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurobiol Aging 155:87–99. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2025.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Berg MVD, Heymans L, Toen D, Adhikari MA, Audekerke JV, Verschuuren M, Pintelon I, Vos WH, et al. (2025) Partial normalization of hippocampal oscillatory activity during sleep in TgF344-AD rats coincides with increased cholinergic synapses at early-plaque stage of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun 13(1):96. 10.1186/s40478-025-02016-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Fowler CF, Goerzen D, Devenyi GA, Madularu D, Chakravarty MM, Near J (2022) Neurochemical and cognitive changes precede structural abnormalities in the TgF344-AD rat model. Brain Commun 4(2):fcac072. 10.1093/braincomms/fcac072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cawthon CR, Spector AC (2023) The nature of available choices affects the intake and meal patterns of rats offered a palatable cafeteria-style diet. Nutrients. 10.3390/nu15245093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Krizova E, Simek V, Abelenda M, Puerta M (1996) Food intake and body weight in rats with daily food-availability restrictions. Physiol Behav 60(3):791–794. 10.1016/0031-9384(96)00161-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kalinovich AV, de Jong JM, Cannon B, Nedergaard J (2017) UCP1 in adipose tissues: two steps to full browning. Biochimie 134:127–137. 10.1016/j.biochi.2017.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Luijten IHN, Feldmann HM, von Essen G, Cannon B, Nedergaard J (2019) In the absence of UCP1-mediated diet-induced thermogenesis, obesity is augmented even in the obesity-resistant 129S mouse strain. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 316(5):E729–E740. 10.1152/ajpendo.00020.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Muñoz-Moreno E, Simões RV, Tudela R, López-Gil X, Soria G (2022) Spatio-temporal metabolic rewiring in the brain of TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep 12(1):16958. 10.1038/s41598-022-20962-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Golub MS, Sobin CA (2020) Statistical modeling with litter as a random effect in mixed models to manage “intralitter likeness.” Neurotoxicol Teratol 77:106841. 10.1016/j.ntt.2019.106841 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Parra-Vargas M, Ramon-Krauel M, Lerin C, Jimenez-Chillaron JC (2020) Size does matter: litter size strongly determines adult metabolism in rodents. Cell Metab 32(3):334–340. 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.07.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tai MM (1994) A mathematical model for the determination of total area under glucose tolerance and other metabolic curves. Diabetes Care 17(2):152–154. 10.2337/diacare.17.2.152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Baloyannis SJ, Mavroudis I, Mitilineos D, Baloyannis IS, Costa VG (2015) The hypothalamus in Alzheimer’s disease: a Golgi and electron microscope study. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 30(5):478–487. 10.1177/1533317514556876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Niwa K, Kazama K, Younkin SG, Carlson GA, Iadecola C (2002) Alterations in cerebral blood flow and glucose utilization in mice overexpressing the amyloid precursor protein. Neurobiol Dis 9(1):61–68. 10.1006/nbdi.2001.0460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Jiang Y, Rezai-Zadeh K, Desmoulins LD, Muenzberg H, Derbenev AV, Zsombok A (2023) GABAergic leptin receptor-expressing neurons in the dorsomedial hypothalamus project to brown adipose tissue-related neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of mice. Auton Neurosci 245:103058. 10.1016/j.autneu.2022.103058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Madden CJ, Morrison SF (2009) Neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus inhibit sympathetic outflow to brown adipose tissue. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 296(3):R831-843. 10.1152/ajpregu.91007.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chitravanshi VC, Kawabe K, Sapru HN (2016) Stimulation of the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus increases brown adipose tissue nerve activity via hypothalamic paraventricular and dorsomedial nuclei. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 311(2):H433-444. 10.1152/ajpheart.00176.2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Pan S, Worker CJ, Feng Earley Y (2023) The hypothalamus as a key regulator of glucose homeostasis: emerging roles of the brain renin-angiotensin system. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 325(1):C141–C154. 10.1152/ajpcell.00533.2022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Sanchez-Delgado G, Martinez-Tellez B, Acosta FM, Virtue S, Vidal-Puig A, Gil A, Llamas-Elvira JM, Ruiz JR (2021) Brown adipose tissue volume and fat content are positively associated with whole-body adiposity in young men-not in women. Diabetes 70(7):1473–1485. 10.2337/db21-0011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kotzbeck P, Giordano A, Mondini E, Murano I, Severi I, Venema W, Cecchini MP, Kershaw EE, et al. (2018) Brown adipose tissue whitening leads to brown adipocyte death and adipose tissue inflammation. J Lipid Res 59(5):784–794. 10.1194/jlr.M079665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Cairo M, Villarroya J (2020) The role of autophagy in brown and beige adipose tissue plasticity. J Physiol Biochem 76(2):213–226. 10.1007/s13105-019-00708-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Cancello R, Zingaretti MC, Sarzani R, Ricquier D, Cinti S (1998) Leptin and UCP1 genes are reciprocally regulated in brown adipose tissue. Endocrinology 139(11):4747–4750. 10.1210/endo.139.11.6434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Deng J, Guo Y, Yuan F, Chen S, Yin H, Jiang X, Jiao F, Wang F, et al. (2020) Autophagy inhibition prevents glucocorticoid-increased adiposity via suppressing BAT whitening. Autophagy 16(3):451–465. 10.1080/15548627.2019.1628537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Clarke JR, Lyra ESNM, Figueiredo CP, Frozza RL, Ledo JH, Beckman D, Katashima CK, Razolli D, et al. (2015) Alzheimer-associated Abeta oligomers impact the central nervous system to induce peripheral metabolic deregulation. EMBO Mol Med 7(2):190–210. 10.15252/emmm.201404183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Anchisi D, Borroni B, Franceschi M, Kerrouche N, Kalbe E, Beuthien-Beumann B, Cappa S, Lenz O, et al. (2005) Heterogeneity of brain glucose metabolism in mild cognitive impairment and clinical progression to Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 62(11):1728–1733. 10.1001/archneur.62.11.1728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Garcia-Lara JM, Aguilar-Navarro S, Gutierrez-Robledo LM, Avila-Funes JA (2010) The metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and Alzheimer’s disease. Rev Invest Clin 62(4):343–349 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Fang X, Tang C, Zhang H, Border JJ, Liu Y, Shin SM, Yu H, Roman RJ, et al. (2023) Longitudinal characterization of cerebral hemodynamics in the TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Geroscience 45(3):1471–1490. 10.1007/s11357-023-00773-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Schulze MB, Stefan N (2024) Metabolically healthy obesity: from epidemiology and mechanisms to clinical implications. Nat Rev Endocrinol 20(11):633–646. 10.1038/s41574-024-01008-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Virtue S (1801) Vidal-Puig A (2010) Adipose tissue expandability, lipotoxicity and the metabolic syndrome–an allostatic perspective. Biochim Biophys Acta 3:338–349. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.White U (2023) Adipose tissue expansion in obesity, health, and disease. Front Cell Dev Biol 11:1188844. 10.3389/fcell.2023.1188844 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Woo CY, Jang JE, Lee SE, Koh EH, Lee KU (2019) Mitochondrial dysfunction in adipocytes as a primary cause of adipose tissue inflammation. Diabetes Metab J 43(3):247–256. 10.4093/dmj.2018.0221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Daly CM, Saxena J, Singh J, Bullard MR, Bondy EO, Saxena A, Buffalino RE, Melville MF, et al. (2022) Sex differences in response to a high fat, high sucrose diet in both the gut microbiome and hypothalamic astrocytes and microglia. Nutr Neurosci 25(2):321–335. 10.1080/1028415X.2020.1752996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Tramunt B, Smati S, Grandgeorge N, Lenfant F, Arnal JF, Montagner A, Gourdy P (2020) Sex differences in metabolic regulation and diabetes susceptibility. Diabetologia 63(3):453–461. 10.1007/s00125-019-05040-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.van Vliet-Ostaptchouk JV, Nuotio ML, Slagter SN, ron D, Fischer K, Foco L, Gaye A, Gögele M, et al. (2014) The prevalence of metabolic syndrome and metabolically healthy obesity in Europe: a collaborative analysis of ten large cohort studies. BMC Endocr Disord 14:9. 10.1186/1472-6823-14-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Hwang L-L, Wang C-H, Li T-L, Chang S-D, Lin L-C, Chen C-P, Chen C-T, Liang K-C, et al. (2010) Sex differences in high-fat diet-induced obesity, metabolic alterations and learning, and synaptic plasticity deficits in mice. Obesity 18(3):463–469. 10.1038/oby.2009.273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Kautzky-Willer A, Leutner M, Harreiter J (2023) Sex differences in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 66(6):986–1002. 10.1007/s00125-023-05891-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Tomic D, Morton JI, Chen L, Salim A, Gregg EW, Pavkov ME, Arffman M, Balicer R, et al. (2022) Lifetime risk, life expectancy, and years of life lost to type 2 diabetes in 23 high-income jurisdictions: a multinational, population-based study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 10(11):795–803. 10.1016/s2213-8587(22)00252-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Goossens GH, Jocken JWE, Blaak EE (2021) Sexual dimorphism in cardiometabolic health: the role of adipose tissue, muscle and liver. Nat Rev Endocrinol 17(1):47–66. 10.1038/s41574-020-00431-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Herz CT, Kulterer OC, Prager M, Marculescu R, Langer FB, Prager G, Kautzky-Willer A, Haug AR, et al. (2021) Sex differences in brown adipose tissue activity and cold-induced thermogenesis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 534:111365. 10.1016/j.mce.2021.111365 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Link JC, Wiese CB, Chen X, Avetisyan R, Ronquillo E, Ma F, Guo X, Yao J, et al. (2020) X chromosome dosage of histone demethylase KDM5C determines sex differences in adiposity. J Clin Invest 130(11):5688–5702. 10.1172/JCI140223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Ngueta G (2025) Male-female differences in insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function in US elders with and without abdominal obesity: an exploratory study with an in-depth race/ethnicity analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 27(10):6006–6010. 10.1111/dom.16586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Ramezankhani A, Azizi F, Hadaegh F (2020) Sex differences in rates of change and burden of metabolic risk factors among adults who did and did not go on to develop diabetes: two decades of follow-up from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Diabetes Care 43(12):3061–3069. 10.2337/dc20-1112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Wright AK, Welsh P, Gill JMR, Kontopantelis E, Emsley R, Buchan I, Ashcroft DM, Rutter MK, et al. (2020) Age-, sex- and ethnicity-related differences in body weight, blood pressure, HbA(1c) and lipid levels at the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes relative to people without diabetes. Diabetologia 63(8):1542–1553. 10.1007/s00125-020-05169-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Age- and sex-specific prevalences of diabetes and impaired glucose regulation in 13 European cohorts (2003). Diabetes Care 26 (1):61–69. 10.2337/diacare.26.1.61 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 100.Ishii M, Iadecola C (2015) Metabolic and non-cognitive manifestations of Alzheimer’s disease: the hypothalamus as both culprit and target of pathology. Cell Metab 22(5):761–776. 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.08.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Auer MK, Nordenstrom A, Lajic S, Reisch N (2023) Congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Lancet 401(10372):227–244. 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01330-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Hahner S, Ross RJ, Arlt W, Bancos I, Burger-Stritt S, Torpy DJ, Husebye ES, Quinkler M (2021) Adrenal insufficiency Nat Rev Dis Primers 7(1):19. 10.1038/s41572-021-00252-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Klegeris A, Schulzer M, Harper DG, McGeer PL (2007) Increase in core body temperature of Alzheimer’s disease patients as a possible indicator of chronic neuroinflammation: a meta-analysis. Gerontology 53(1):7–11. 10.1159/000095386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kelberman MA, Anderson CR, Chlan E, Rorabaugh JM, McCann KE, Weinshenker D (2022) Consequences of hyperphosphorylated tau in the locus coeruleus on behavior and cognition in a rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 86(3):1037–1059. 10.3233/JAD-215546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.van Marken Lichtenbelt WD, Schrauwen P (2011) Implications of nonshivering thermogenesis for energy balance regulation in humans. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 301(2):R285-296. 10.1152/ajpregu.00652.2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Profenno LA, Porsteinsson AP, Faraone SV (2010) Meta-analysis of Alzheimer’s disease risk with obesity, diabetes, and related disorders. Biol Psychiatry 67(6):505–512. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Schrijvers EM, Witteman JC, Sijbrands EJ, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Breteler MM (2010) Insulin metabolism and the risk of Alzheimer disease: the Rotterdam study. Neurology 75(22):1982–1987. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ffe4f6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Anderson T, Sharma S, Kelberman MA, Ware C, Guo N, Qin Z, Weinshenker D, Parent MB (2023) Obesity during preclinical Alzheimer’s disease development exacerbates brain metabolic decline. J Neurochem. 10.1111/jnc.15900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Robison LS, Gannon OJ, Thomas MA, Salinero AE, Abi-Ghanem C, Poitelon Y, Belin S, Zuloaga KL (2020) Role of sex and high-fat diet in metabolic and hypothalamic disturbances in the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroinflammation 17(1):285. 10.1186/s12974-020-01956-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Valentin-Escalera J, Leclerc M, Calon F (2024) High-fat diets in animal models of Alzheimer’s disease: how can eating too much fat increase Alzheimer’s disease risk? J Alzheimers Dis 97(3):977–1005. 10.3233/JAD-230118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Even PC, Nadkarni NA (2012) Indirect calorimetry in laboratory mice and rats: principles, practical considerations, interpretation and perspectives. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 303(5):R459-476. 10.1152/ajpregu.00137.2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Rubio WB, Cortopassi MD, Banks AS (2023) Indirect calorimetry to assess energy balance in mice: measurement and data analysis. Methods Mol Biol 2662:103–115. 10.1007/978-1-0716-3167-6_9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Moreno O, Fernández I, Plaza-García S, Padro D, Baz Z, Ramos-Cabrer P, Martín A, Llop J (2026) Longitudinal P2X7R and myelin PET reveal distinct neuroinflammatory and white matter signatures compared with TSPO PET and DTI-MRI in the TgF344-AD rat model. Neuroimage 327:121753. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Hall SE, White ZJ, Rohn TT, Sudasinghe KH, Young ME (2025) Exercise improves Alzheimer’s disease phenotype in the TgF344-AD rat, a behavioral time course study of males and females. Brain Sci. 10.3390/brainsci15060631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Hernandez AR, Parker E, Babar M, Banerjee A, Ding S, Simley A, Buford TW (2024) Microbiome-driven alterations in metabolic pathways and impaired cognition in aged female TgF344-AD rats. Aging Brain 5:100119. 10.1016/j.nbas.2024.100119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Anckaerts C, Blockx I, Summer P, Michael J, Hamaide J, Kreutzer C, Boutin H, Couillard-Després S, et al. (2019) Early functional connectivity deficits and progressive microstructural alterations in the TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer’s disease: a longitudinal MRI study. Neurobiol Dis 124:93–107. 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.11.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Gamboa-Gomez CI, Simental-Mendia LE, Rodriguez-Moran M, Guerrero-Romero F (2019) The fat-to-lean mass ratio, a novel anthropometric index, is associated to glucose metabolic disorders. Eur J Intern Med 63:74–78. 10.1016/j.ejim.2019.03.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Guerra Valencia J, Castillo-Paredes A, Gibaja-Arce C, Saavedra-Garcia L, Barengo NC (2024) The association between lean-to-fat mass ratio and cardiometabolic abnormalities: an analytical cross-sectional study. J Clin Med Res 16(2–3):81–93. 10.14740/jocmr5096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Park HK, Shim YS (2025) Association between lean mass and the risk of metabolic syndrome in Korean children and adolescents: data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination survey. Endocr J 72(11):1227–1237. 10.1507/endocrj.EJ25-0178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESM 1 (284.6KB, png)

Supplementary Material 1 (PNG 284 KB)

ESM 2 (200.5KB, png)

Supplementary Material 2 (PNG 200 KB)

ESM3 (20.4KB, docx)

(DOCX 20.4 KB)

ESM4 (29.4KB, docx)

(DOCX 29.3 KB)

ESM5 (25.7KB, docx)

(DOCX 25.7 KB)

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the findings can be found online at Mendeley’s Data Repository with the 10.17632/rthpp2ktb7.1


Articles from Molecular Neurobiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES