Abstract
Microorganisms, especially their co-cultures, that can degrade pollutants in non-sterile wastewater without requiring external nutrient supplementation, are important for sustainable wastewater treatment practices. This study aimed to (1) perform biodegradation of triclosan (TCS) using co-culture of locally isolated Bacillus licheniformis AEM2 (GenBank: PQ856279) and Lysinibacillus fusiformis AEM5 (GenBank: PQ856280), (2) analyze degradation byproducts and biodegradation pathway of TCS, (3) examine in vitro cytotoxicity of degradation byproducts, and (4) develop a non-sterile culture process for TCS biodegradation. In mono-culture strategy, TCS-containing mineral salt broth medium (MSBM) was inoculated with 1 mL of preculture of either AEM2 or AEM5. In co-culture strategy, two bacteria were simultaneously inoculated into the culture media at the different inoculum volumes (between 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 mL/100 mL for each bacterium, with a total inoculum volume of 1 mL). The co-culture C (0.25 mL of AEM2 pre-culture + 0.75 mL of AEM5 pre-culture) (80.62% degradation efficiency) exhibited higher TCS degradation potential than mono-cultures and other co-culture formulations (p < 0.05). Under the optimized culture conditions (initial pH 7.0, temperature 25 °C and incubation time 72 h), the co-culture C achieved complete degradation (100%) of 10 mg/L TCS in MSBM. The main degradation products were low-chlorinated or chlorine-free phenolic intermediates. Oxygenases and dehalogenases were predicted to be responsible for biodegradation of TCS. In contrast to the parent compound TCS, its degradation products did not cause a statistically significant cell toxicity within the concentration range of 5–80 µg/mL (p > 0.05). The co-culture C could degrade 88.55% of 10 mg/L TCS within 72 h in non-sterile wastewater, which no external nutrients were added. To the best of our knowledge, this study investigates for the first time the TCS biodegradation potential of B. licheniformis and L. fusiformis, and evaluates the effectiveness of a non-sterile, bacteria-based co-culture system for TCS remediation.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00449-026-03331-9.
Keywords: Triclosan, Biodegradation pathway, Co-culture, Toxicity, Non-sterile process
Introduction
Personal care products (PPCPs), which are indispensable for humans, include soaps, creams, toothpastes, deodorants and disinfectants. After these products are discarded of after their use, they pass into sewerage systems and are treated in wastewater treatment plants. However, it has been reported that the actual removal processes in wastewater treatment plants are limited [1–4].
Triclosan (TCS), also known as 2,4,4‘-trichloro-2’-dihydroxy diphenyl ether, is one of the important PPCPs. Due to its antimicrobial properties, TCS is widely used as an ingredient of pharmaceutical and personal care products (mostly antibacterial soaps, disinfectants, toothpaste and some cosmetics) [5, 6].
TCS has been reported to cause contact dermatitis, some allergic reactions, and low-level endocrine disrupting effects in humans [7, 8]. Animal studies have shown that TCS can increase fatty liver disease and lead to developmental disorders [9, 10]. In addition, this compound has been reported to cause bioaccumulation and endocrine disrupting effects in fish, as well as oxidative stress, DNA damage, and metabolic disorders in algae and benthic organisms [11, 12]. Furthermore, it has been noted that this compound contributes to the development of antibiotic resistance and can transform into more toxic compounds, such as dioxin-like products, when it reacts with sunlight and water [8, 13, 14]. For these reasons, TCS is considered a chemical that requires careful evaluation [7, 8, 13].
TCS is commonly detected in surface waters, wastewater, and sediments, its removal from these environmens is considered a critical necessity. Accordingly, advanced oxidation, adsorption, and biodegradation methods are used to remove TCS from environmental sources [1, 15–18]. In biodegradation of TCS, fungi and bacteria can be used. To date, some bacterial strains such as Citrobacter freundii KS2003, Pseudomonas aeruginosa KS2002, Enterobacter cloacae, Bacillus sp. DL4 and Dyella sp. have been reported to capable of degrading TCS [19–23]. However, it is possible to say that discovering new bacteria that can degrade TCS with higher efficiency and do not create toxic degradation byproducts may offer advantages in the removal of TCS from wastewater environments. For instance, TCS-degrading potentials of Bacillus licheniformis and Lysinibacillus fusiformis strains have not been studied yet.
Biodegradation of toxical compounds is performed by using monoculture (only one microorganism species) or co-culture (mixed culture of two or more microorganism species); however, it is known that co-cultures generally provide higher biodegradation efficiency when compared to monoculture [24, 25]. So far, the biodegradation of various toxic substances has been achieved by using co-cultures [26–31]. However, co-culture technique for bacterial biodegradation of TCS has not been tested in the literature.
Microorganisms can be cultivated in sterile or non-sterile cultures for the biodegradation of toxic pollutants or the production of valuable metabolites [32–37]. In a non-sterile culture technique, the target microorganism is directly inoculated into the non-sterile culture medium or non-sterile wastewater environment. After the inoculation, the inoculated microorganism is anticipated to become more prevailing over endogenous microorganisms of non-sterile medium or external contamination during cultivation period. In the non-sterile culture technique, some simple methods are harnessed to make the target microorganism dominant, such as keeping the inoculation volume of the target microorganism high and adjusting the pH of the medium according to the target microorganism. In a non-sterile culture process, the culture medium or wastewater medium is not sterilized and the control of external contamination is not required [32, 33, 38, 39]. This process makes possible energy saving in a wastewater treatment system or bioreactors with large volume. Up to now, diverse microorganisms have been evaluated for their potency to degrade different toxic organic pollutants in non-sterile biological treatment process [37, 40–44]. Similarly, existing studies on microbial degradation of TCS have been conducted exclusively under sterile laboratory conditions, which do not adequately reflect real wastewater environments. Conversely, the biodegradation of TCS by bacteria in a non-sterile culture system, where competition with indigenous microorganisms occurs, has not been evaluated.
In short, there are some gaps in the literature regarding the microbial biodegradation of TCS: The lack of studies on B. licheniformis and L. fusiformis, the absence of co-culture and non-sterile culture strategies, and the unassessed toxicity of degradation products. Therefore, the present study aims to address these gaps by (1) investigating the TCS-degrading potential of mono-and co-cultures of locally isolated B. licheniformis and L. fusiformis (2) identifying the degradation products and proposing a possible biodegradation pathway, (3) assessing the in vitro cytotoxicity of the resulting degradation products, and (4) developing a non-sterile culture process without requiring external nutrient supplementation with potential applicability to real wastewater treatment systems.
Materials and methods
Isolation of triclosan-degrading bacteria
Bacteria capable of degrading triclosan (TCS) were isolated from the activated sludge of a wastewater treatment system in Erzurum, Turkey. Precautions were taken during sludge sample collection to encumber unwanted-microbial contamination from external environment. Hence, a sterile wide-mouthed glass bottle was submerged in the activated sludge, its cap was opened within the sludge, and after collecting the sample, the cap was closed again while still in the sludge. After being transported to our laboratory in a cooling box, one gram sample from activated-sludge was added into another sterile bottle containing 100 mL of sterile- saline water, and the bottle was shaken vigorously for 30 s. After the suspension was serially diluted, 0.5 mL of the prepared dilution samples were spreaded on the petri dishes containing MSAM (mineral salt agar medium) (Omeroglu et al., 2025). This medium (pH 8.0) included KH2PO4 (1 g/L), (NH4)SO4 (1.5 g/L), MgSO4 (0.2 g/L), NaCl (0.5 g/L), CaCl2 2H2O (0.02 g/L), NaHCO3 (0.03 g/L)], ZnSO4 7H2O (0.02 g/L), MnCl2 4H2O (0.1 g/L), FeSO4 (0.005 mg/L), CuSO4 5H2O (0.3 g/L), agar (20 g/L) and TCS (50 mg/L). In this medium, TCS was used as sole carbon source in the medium. Petri-dishes were incubated aerobically at 25 °C for 24 h. After the incubation period was completed, developed-bacterial colonies on petri dishes were subcultured and purified. The isolates were coded and then employed for the next stages of the study.
Screening of triclosan-degrading bacteria
In order to evaluate the potential of the isolates to degrade TCS, their pre-cultures were firstly prepared. For this purpose, the isolates were grown aerobically in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth medium at 25 °C for 24 h. Afterwards, 1 mL of pre-cultures (OD600=1.0) were inoculated into 250 mL flask containing 100 mL of mineral salt broth medium (MSBM) supplemented with 10 mg/L TCS. The flasks were placed in a shaking incubator and incubated at 25 °C for 24 h. After the incubation, the amount of TCS in the cultures were determined spectrophotometrically according to the previously described method [45]. In brief, the culture was centrifuged (3800 x g for 10 min) using a centrifuge (Beckman Coulter Allegra X-30R), and the supernatant was diluted with distilled water to obtain absorbance values that corresponded to the linear range of the calibration curve (It was prepared using known concentrations of TCS). The absorbance of samples was measured at 475 nm, and TCS concentration was calculated by comparing the absorbance values of the sample to the standard curve.
The isolates with high TCS degradation capacity were selected based on the result of spectrophotometric measurement; however, their TCS degradation capacity were also analysed using a reverse-phase HPLC system (Shimadzu LC-20AD). For this purpose, the culture supernatants were subjected to ethyl acetate-extraction (1:1, v/v) at 150 rpm for 6 h. The organic phase obtained after extraction was dewatered with Na2SO4 to remove residual water. In the last step, the organic phase was evaporated to dryness by evaporator. The concentrated TCS residues were dissolved in 1 mL methanol. The prepared sample was analysed by a reverse-phase HPLC system (Shimadzu LC-20AD) equipped with a photodiode array (PDA) detector (SPD-M20A). Separation was achieved on a Kinetex® C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm particle size, 100 Å pore size; Phenomenex, USA). The mobile phase consisted of solvent A and solvent B mixed in an isocratic ratio of 15:85 (v/v). The flow rate was set at 0.8 mL/min. The column temperature was maintained at 25 °C throughout the analysis. The total run time was 15 min. Detection was carried out at 250 nm with a bandwidth of 4 nm. The PDA detector operated with a reference wavelength of 350 nm, and the cell temperature was maintained at 40 °C.
The percentage of TCS degradation was calculated according to the following Eq. (1).
![]() |
1 |
Where C0 is the initial TCS concentration (mg/L) and C1 is the final TCS concentration (mg/L).
Molecular identification of TCS-degrading bacteria
Two isolates exhibiting higher potential to degrade TCS were molecularly identified based on 16 S rRNA sequence analysis. For this purpose, firstly, genomic The extraction of DNA from bacterial cells was performed using Promega Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (A2360) protocol. For the amplification of 16 S rRNA gene, the following primers were used: 27 F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492 R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′). The PCR product was cloned into Escherichia coli strain JM101 using pGEM-T Easy Cloning Vector (Promega, Southampton, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After cloning, samples were sequenced at Macrogen Company (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The GenBank accession number was determined by comparison with other bacterial sequences available in GenBank and EzTaxon (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih and http://www.eztaxon.org). A Neighbour-Joining phylogenetic tree based on the 16 S rRNA gene sequencing data was then constructed using Mega 11 software.
Comparison of TCS biodegradation abilities of mono-and co-cultures of selected bacteria
In this step, mono-cultures and co-cultures of two bacteria were tested for TCS degradation. For this purpose, pre-cultures of bacteria were prepared in LB broth medium and the optical density of each pre-culture was setted to 1.0 absorbance at 600 nm. To prepare co-culture from two isolates, different volumes of precultures of two isolates were combined.
Mono-culture and co-cultures formulations were designed as follows.
Mono-culture A: It was inoculated with preculture (1 mL) of isolate I.
Mono-culture B: It was inoculated with preculture (1 mL) of isolate II.
Co-culture C: It was inoculated with preculture (0.25 mL) of isolate I and preculture (0.75 mL) of isolate II.
Co-culture D: It was inoculated with preculture (0.5 mL) of isolate I and preculture (0.5 mL) of isolate II.
Co-culture E: It was inoculated with preculture (0.75 mL) of isolate I and preculture (0.25 mL) of isolate II.
The total size of pre-cultures was adjusted to 1 mL/100 mL. After 250 mL-flasks containing 100 mL of sterile MSBM supplemented with 10 mg/L TCS were inoculated with the pre-cultures, they were incubated at 25 °C for 24 h. After the incubation, the cultures were centrifuged at 3800 x g for 10 min and the obtained supernatants were used to determine the degradation ratio of TCS. In this stage, the amount of TCS in the supernatants was determined spectrophotometrically. Degradation efficiency was presented as percentage removal for comparison clarity.
Effects of culture parameters on TCS biodegradation potential of co-culture
After determining the most favorable co-culture combination, the subsequent experiments were focused on evaluating the effects of medium pH (6, 7, 8, 9 and 10), temperature (15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 and 60 °C), initial TCS concentration (5, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 mg/L) and incubation time (24, 48, 72 and 96 h) on the TCS biodegradation potential of the co-culture. In the experiments, one mL of co-culture was employed to inoculate the sterile MSBM supplemented with TCS. After the inoculation, the flasks were incubated in a shaking incubator at 150 rpm under sterile conditions. At the end of the specified incuabtion period, the amount of TCS in the culture sepernatants was determined spectrophotometrically and the degradation efficiency was presented as percentage removal for comparison clarity.
Analysis of degradation byproducts and degradation pathway of TCS
To analyze TCS degradation products, the culture was centrifuged at 3800 x g for 10 min. After the pH of the culture supernatant was adjusted to 2.0 using 1 M H2SO4, it was extracted with ethyl acetate (1:1, v/v) at 150 rpm for 6 h. The organic phase was evaporated and the concentrated TCS residues were dissolved in methanol. After BSTFA (20 µL) was added, the mixture was incubated at 50 °C for 1 h. GC-MS analysis was performed to analyze the degradation metabolites in the mixture.
Predicting the biodegradation pathway of TCS was performed mainly based on the types of the chemical reactions, which catalyze the formation of TCS degradation metabolites. Moreover, the laccase and manganese peroxidase activities in the culture were also analyzed to elucidate their possible role in TCS degradation. Determination of laccase and manganese peroxidase activities was performed according to the method described in our previous study [39].
Toxicity analysis of triclosan and its degradation products
The supernatant from the treatment culture was extracted with ethyl acetate (1:1, v/v) at 150 rpm for 6 h. The ethyl acetate fraction was dewatered with Na2SO4 and then was evaporated to dryness using a rotory evaporator. The concentrated final material (TCS residues) was weighed and quantified. For the toxicity analysis, the final material was dissolved in 1 mL DMSO (1%) and this solution was used as stock. The stock solution was then diluted with DMSO (1%) to prepare different dilution groups (5–160 µg TCS residues/mL DMSO) from TCS residues. Similarly, dilution samples were prepared from pure TCS with 1% DMSO at the same concentrations. Finally, the dilutions samples were evaluated for their potantial cytotoxic properties.
Cytotoxicity level was evaluated by water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST-1) method measuring mitochondrial reductase activity. L929 (mouse fibroblast cell line, ATCC CCL-1) cells used in the viability assay were incubated in DMEM/F-12 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), L-glutamine and 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin (at 37℃ in a 5% CO2 incubator). The culture medium was changed every 2 days. A concentration of 3 × 104 cells/mL was seeded in 96-well plates. The cultured cells were treated with the dilution samples (containing TCS or TCS residues) and then were re-incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Cells not exposed to TCS or its degradation products were used as the control (C) group. Optical density was measured at 450 nm in a multi-well plate reader (Thermo Scientific™ Multiskan™ Microplate Spectrophotometer). The viability was given as percentage (%).
Biodegradation of TCS by co-culture in non-sterile wastewater-based medium
In this step of the study, TCS-degrading capacity of the co-culture was tested sterile or non-sterile wastewater-based medium under non-sterile conditions. Experiments for TCS degradation were carried out in 250 mL flasks containing 100 mL wastewater-based media. Three different media were prepared for the experiments. All media contained only wastewater and 10 mg/L TCS and no nutrients (minerals, carbon source, nitrogen source, etc.) were added to these media. The pH of the prepared media was not adjusted (the initial pH of the wastewater was 7.12). Medium I was sterilised and the co-culture was then inoculated into this medium. Medium II was not sterilized and directly inoculated with co-culture. Medium III was not sterilized and the co-culture was not inoculated. In addition, the flasks containing non-sterile wastewater media (medium II and medium III) were not covered with cotton plug and then left to the incubation under non-sterile conditions opened to environment. At this stage of media testing, the temperature of the shaking incubator was kept constant at 25 °C. The final concentration of TCS in the cultures was analysed using HPLC. The degradation ratios (%) were calculated according to the formula (1) described above.
In addition, samples were taken from the cultures in Processes I, II, and III at the end of the specified incubation period and spread onto TSA medium in petri dishes. After an incubation period of 24 h, the colony and cell morphologies of the bacteria developing on TSA were examined. According to the results obtained, the capacity of co-cultured bacteria to dominate the indigenous microorganisms of wastewater was evaluated.
Statistical analysis
Three independent experiments were performed and the measurements were made in at least two replicates (n = 6). Statistical analysis of the data was performed using SPSS 29.0 and GraphPad Prism 8.0 programs. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied for comparisons between groups. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (Mean ± SD). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results and discussion
Isolation and screening of triclosan-degrading bacteria
In this study, two important points were taken into consideration during the isolation of bacteria capable of degrading triclosan (TCS). The first point was to select high medium pH (pH 8), thereby eliminating moulds, yeasts and fungi. The second point was to add TCS into the medium as sole carbon source during all isolation experiments. The aim of the second approach was to canalize bacteria to use TCS as a carbon source and thus enable them to degrade TCS enzymatically. Considering these points, a total of 24 bacterial isolates capable of degrading TCS were obtained from the activated sludge sample of the wastewater treatment plant.
The TCS degradation capacities of the isolates were determined by spectrophotometric method. The results showed that three isolates (AEM2, AEM5 and AEM20) had higher TCS degradation ability compared to the others. The degradation ratios of TCS were determined to be 59.15% and 59.21% in the culture of the isolate AEM2, 61.9% and 59.86% in the culture of the isolate AEM5, and 20.73% and 18.34% in the culture of the isolate AEM20 according to the spectrophotometric and HPLC-based methods, respectively. These results indicate that spectrophotometric method-based data were in parallel with HPLC-based data. It is well known that spectrophotometric method is easier and requires less labor than the HPLC measurement method. Accordingly, the amount of residual TCS in the cultures was determined spectrophotometrically during optimization studies.
The results also clarified that two isolates (AEM2 and AEM5) have much higher biodegradation ability compared to the others isolates including AEM20 (Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Fig. S1). Considering these results, the isolates AEM2 (Fig. 1a) and AEM5 (Fig. 1c) were chosen for the subsequent stages of the study. Both AEM2 and AEM5 were determined to be gram-positive. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) analyses revealed that both isolates are rod-shaped bacteria (Fig. 1b, d).
Fig. 1.
Colony and cell morphologies of AEM2 and AEM5 a colony morphology of AEM2 on LB agar, b cell morphology of AEM2 based on transmission electron microscope (TEM), c colony morphology of AEM5 on LB agar, d cell morphology of AEM5 based on TEM
Molecular identification of the isolates AEM2 and AEM5
Based on 16 S rRNA gene analysis, AEM2 (GenBank accession: PQ856279) and AEM5 (GenBank accession: PQ856280) were identified as Bacillus licheniformis (Fig. 2a) and Lysinibacillus fusiformis, respectively (Fig. 2b). This finding is good agrement with the fact that B. licheniformis and L. fusiformis strains can be isolated from wastewater systems [46, 47].
Fig. 2.
Neighbor joining phylogenetic trees of AEM2 (a) and AEM5 (b) on the basis of 16 S rRNA gene sequence analysis
In the literature, it is known that B. licheniformis strains are used in the production of various metabolites that find applications in the food, aquaculture, biomedicine, and pharmaceutical industries. Moreover, its some strains are also used in agricultural studies and enviromental biotechnology [48, 49]. Similarly, L. fusiformis strains have been reported to find applications in agricultural and industrial biotechnologies as well as environmental biotechnology [50–52].
In environmental biotechnology, strains of two bacteria can be used for removal of heavy metals and the biodegradation of toxic organic compounds [53–57]. On the contrary, there is no report on the TCS degradation potential of neither B. licheniformis nor L. fusiformis. Therefore, revealing the TCS degradation abilities of these two species may contribute to environmental biotechnology studies.
Biodegradation of TCS by mono- and co-cultures of selected bacteria
The mono-cultures or co-cultures of microorganisms can be used in biodegradation of organic pollutants; however, co-cultures have been reported to exhibit higher biodegradation capacity [24, 25]. For instance, Li et al. [58] reported that the co-culture containing LM1 and LY1 bacterial strains could degrade approximately 98% of 17β-estradiol (5 mg/L) within 7 days, while the mono-cultures of LM1 and LY1 exhibited the degradation yields of 77% and 68%, respectively. Hong et al. [59] showed that the co-culture of two bacteria (Rhodococcus rhodochrous BX2 and Pseudomonas sp. LY-1) provided higher triclocarban degradation when compared to their mono-cultures. Wu et al. [59] found that the mono-cultures of Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa could degrade respectively 32.61% and 54.35% of crude oil, while the co-culture of the bacteria exhibited the degradation efficiency of 63.05% However, a co-culture formulation of microorganisms for biodegradation of TCS has not been tested in any study so far. Accordingly, in the present study, the potential of co-culture of two isolates (B. licheniformis AEM2) and (L. fusiformis AEM5) in TCS degradation was also assessed. The efficiency of the co-culture was compared with mono-cultures of the isolates. During the experiments, the total inoculum volume of both mono-cultures and co-cultures was adjusted to 1 mL/100 mL.
The spectrophotometric results elucidated that mono-culture A (AEM2) and mono-culture B (AEM5) could degrade TCS by approximately 57% (57.34) and 60% (60.22%), respectively. The degradation efficiencies of co-culture C (0.25 mL of AEM2 pre-culture + 0.75 mL of AEM5 pre-culture), co-culture D (0.5 mL of AEM2 pre-culture + 0.5 mL of AEM5 pre-culture), and co-culture E (0.75 mL of AEM2 pre-culture + 0.25 mL of AEM5 pre-culture) were determined as 80.62%, 78.16% and 74.28% at the end of 24 h incubation period, respectively (Fig. 3). These results demonstrate that all co-cultures, especially co-culture C, provided statistically higher biodegradation rates as compared to mono-cultures (p < 0.05). As reported in previous studies, the higher degrading capacity of co-culture in the present study can be explained by synergistic effects between two bacteria, namely, mechanisms such as increased enzyme diversity, intermediate product consumption, and stress load sharing [24, 25, 60–63]. Taking into account of these data, the next steps of the work were continued with the co-culture C.
Fig. 3.

Triclosan-degrading capacities of mono-cultures and co-cultures of isolates. Culture conditions: pH 8, temperature 25 °C, TCS concentration 10 mg/L and incubation time 24 h. The pre-cultures were mono-culture A (1 mL of AEM2 pre-culture), mono-culture B (1 mL of AEM5 pre-culture), co-culture C (0.25 mL of AEM2 pre-culture + 0.75 mL of AEM5 pre-culture), co-culture D (0.5 mL of AEM2 pre-culture + 0.5 mL of AEM5 pre-culture) and co-culture E (0.75 mL of AEM2 pre-culture + 0.25 mL of AEM5 pre-culture). Three independent experiments were conducted and measurements were made in at least two replicates (n = 6) and presented as mean ± SD. The residual TCS in the culture was analyzed spectrophotometrically. HPLC analysis was performed only for the cultures of the three isolates that showed TCS degradation ability in spectrophotometric measurements. All statistical analyses were performed using concentration data (mg/L). However, degradation efficiency was presented as percentage removal for comparison clarity
Effects of environmental factors on TCS biodegradation potential of co-culture
In studies on the degradation of toxic substances by microorganisms, the pH of the medium is one of the important parameters that are effective for the growth and degradation of microorganisms. For example, the study performed by Wang et al. [19] manifested that Dyella sp. WW1 isolated from activated sludge exhibited the maximum degradation efficiency at 15 °C and pH 7. Balakrishnan and Mohan [64] reported that the TCS degradation potential of the strain Providencia rettgeri MB-IIT was at maximum at pH 7. Kumari et al. [21] elucidated that the TCS-degrading potency of Citrobacter freundii KS2003 isolated from a wastewater sample reached to the maximum at pH 8 In the study by Li et al. [65], Bacillus sp. DL4 was reported to exhibit the maximum TCS removal at pH 7.31. Temperature is another environmental factor affecting biodegradation efficiency of microorganisms. For example; Ghafouri et al. [23] reported the optimum temperature for TCS removal with Enterobacter cloacae as 32 °C. In a separate study [65], the optimum temperature for TCS removal with Bacillus sp. DL4 was found to be 35 °C. In the study conducted by Kumari and co-workers [21], the optimum temperature for TCS-degrading ability of Citrobacter freundii KS2003 was determined to be 30 °C.
In the present study, the potential of the co-culture to degrade TCS was studied at different (pH 6–10), temperatures (15–60 °C), TCS concentrations (5–50 mg/L) and incubation times (0–96 h). Degradation efficiency was presented as percentage removal for comparison clarity. However, all statistical analyses were performed using concentration data (mg/L).
Quantitative statistical analysis demonstrated that TCS degradation efficiency of the co-culture was significantly affected by the alterations in the studied operational parameters (p < 0.05). TCS degradation by the co-culture was detected across all tested pH conditions, with the highest degradation efficiency (86.83%) observed at pH 7. When the experiments were performed at a TCS concentration of 10 mg/L, an incubation period of 24 h, and pH 7, the co-culture displayed its maximum TCS degradation efficiency (87.96%) at 25 °C, followed by 30 °C. However, it was determined that the co-culture was also capable of degrading TCS in a wide temperature range from 15 to 60 °C (Fig. 4b). Overall, these findings suggest that the co-culture may be used as a novel bioremediation formulation in biological wastewater treatment systems, particularly in environments characterized by variable pH and temperature regimes.
Fig. 4.
Effects of initial pH (a), temperature (b), TCS concentration (c) and incubation time (d) on TCS-degrading potential of co-culture. Effect of initial pH was studied at a temperature of 25 °C, a TCS concentration of 10 mg/L, and an incubation time of 24 h. Effect of temperature was studied at pH 7, TCS concentration of 10 mg/L and an incubation time of 24 h. Effect of TCS concentration was studied at pH 7, a temperature of 25 °C and an incubation time of 24 h. Effect of incubation time was studied at pH 7, a temperature of 25 °C and a TCS concentration of 10 mg/L. Three independent experiments were conducted and measurements were be made in at least two replicates (n = 6) and presented as mean ± SD. TCS degradation was analyzed spectrophotometrically. All statistical analyses were performed using concentration data (mg/L). However, degradation efficiency was presented as percentage removal for comparison clarity
As seen from Fig. 4c, the degradation efficiency decreasd as initial TCS concentration increased (p < 0.05), when other operational parameters were kept constant (initial pH 7, temperature 25 °C, and incubation time 24 h). The co-culture was able to degrade 4.57 mg (91.35%) of 5 mg/L TCS. However, a degradation efficiency dropped to 8.853 mg/L (88.53%) at a concentration of 10 mg/L TCS (Fig. 4c). This finding indicates a possible toxic effect of TCS on bacterial growth at higher concentrations. However, the subsequent stages of the study were conducted at the TCS concentration of 10 mg/L, which is the most commonly used concentration in the literature and also is the accumulation rate of TCS in nature.
Another parameter affecting the efficiency of microbial degradation is the incubation time. In the present study, the degration ratios of TCS (10 mg/L) were found to be 92.85%, 98.13%, 100% and 100% at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h, respectively (Fig. 4d). Statistical analyses based on the quantitative data of these degration ratios revealed that incubation time had a significant effect on TCS degradation (p < 0.05). The degration ratios and quantitative data elucidated that the co-culture exhibited the highest TCS degradation capacity within the first 24 h of incubation and was able to completely degrade TCS within 72 h.
Studies to date have shown that, depending on the type of bacteria used, the degradation time of TCS ranges from 4 to 13 days [20, 21, 23, 65–67]. Conversely, the results of the current elucidated that the co-culture completely degraded TCS within a shorter time of 72 h. This can be atributed to the high enzymatic activity and rapid metabolic capacity of two bacteria, which are components of the co-culture. The co-culture’s ability to rapidly degrade TCS can shorten processing times in wastewater treatment systems, leading to savings in energy and operational costs.
Analysis of TCS degradation byproducts and TCS degrading-enzyme activities
After the complete degradation (100%) of TCS was achieved within 72 h, the culture was centrifuged and the supernatant was used for GC-MS based metabolite analysis. The GC-MS analysis revealed that there were 25 substances in the final culture. The concentration of residual TCS (the compound 11 in GC-MS chromatogram) was determined to be only 1.76%, indicating that TCS was almost completely degraded in the culture (Supplementary Fig. S2).
In GC-MS chromatogram, there are some metabolites (Hexadecanoic acid, 9-Octadecanamide, Octadecanoic acid, Nonadecanol, 1-Heptadecane and 1-octadecene), which are considered to be related with cell or lipid metabolism. The compound pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione, hexahydro-3-(phenylmethyl) possessing a peptide-like structure was considered to be a microbial metabolite. Furthermore, GC-MS chromatogram indicates that the culture contains also small phenolic compounds, with or without Cl.
Microbial enzymes such as laccases, manganese peroxidases, oxygenases and dehalogenases are known to be effective in biodegradation of various toxic compounds including pharmaceuticals, personal care products, phenols, pesticides, herbicides, industrial dyes, etc [39, 64, 68–71]. Laccases and manganese peroxidases are known for their strong degradation activity, high oxidative power, and broad substrate specificity. Therefore, these enzymes or microorganisms-producing them are widely used in bioremediation studies [39]. Oxygenases are another prominent group of microorganisms-derived enzymes related with the biodegradation of toxical aromatic compounds. They catalyze the ring cleavage of the aromatic compounds and thus cause their precise mineralization. There are two main groups of oxygenases: monooxygenases and dioxygenases. The first group catalyzes the incorporation of one atom of the oxygen into the substrate, while the second group perform the catalyzing the addition of both atoms of the oxygen into the substrate [72]. Monooxygenases can perform, C-C bond forming and C-C bond breaking, demethylation and hydroxylation reactions, while dioxygenases catalyze the dehydroxylation reactions [39]. Due to these potential activities, oxygenases (monooxygenases and dioxygenases) and laccases can perform ether bond cleavage in organic pollutants [31, 39, 73].
Dehalogenation is the removal of halogen atoms such as F, Cl, and Br from an organic molecule [71, 74]. In aerobic-biological dehalogenation reactions, hydrolytic dehalogenases and oxygenases are involved. Hydrolytic dehalogenases generally break the C–Cl bond via hydrolysis, namely, they provide hydrolytic dechlorination, and thus play an important role in environmental degradation and biotechnological applications [75]. Some oxygenases can destabilize halogenated substrates via hydroxylation reaction, thus leading to the removal of the halogen from the structure of destabilized subtrates [74].
It has been documented that B. licheniformis and L. fusiformis are capable of producing hydrolytic enzymes such as manganese peroxidases, laccases, dehalogenases, and oxygenases, which are responsible for toxic organic pollutants [22, 76–80]. The results of the current study revealed that neither laccase nor manganase peroxidase activity was detected in the culture during the incubation period. This finding suggests that neither of these two enzymes plays a role in the breakdown of TCS. Therefore, enzymes being responsible for TCS degradation were predicted based on the chemical reactions catalyzing the formation of TCS degradation by-products.
In the present study, the chlorinated intermediates and characteristic isotope distribution patterns observed in the GC-MS chromatogram indicate that an oxygenase-mediated activation initially occurred on the aromatic ring. Monooxygenase or dioxygenase type enzymes cause oxidative activation by adding a hydroxyl group to the aromatic ring. This event facilitates the cleavage of the ether bond (Ar–O–Ar) [81–83]. In the present study, this oxidative activation carried out by monooxygenase/dioxygenase enzymes may have facilitated the cleavage of the diphenyl ether bond and paved the way for the formation of chlorinated phenolic intermediates. The mono- and di-chlorinated phenols observed in the GC-MS at the mid-retention time suggest that the ether bond of TCS was enzymatically cleaved, thus converting TCS into two separate phenolic derivatives. Similar chlorinated intermediates derived from TCS have also been reported in studies conducted in previous years [84–86].
The detection of mono- and dichlorinated phenols in the GC-MS chromatogram and the weakening of the isotopic pattern parallel to the decrease in chloride number support sequential dehalogenation steps. These results are consistent with the knowledge that dehalogenases and cytochrome P450-type monooxygenases play a role in the oxidative conversion and sequential dehalogenation of chlorinated phenols [87–91]. The presence of lower molecular weight phenol-like compounds during the intermediate retention time indicates that aromatic ring modification or partial ring simplification reactions have occurred.
In short, the proposed pathway for the degradation of TCS involves the following steps: (i) oxygenase-mediated aromatic activation, (ii) oxidative cleavage of the ether bond, and (iii) stepwise dehalogenation leading to the formation of low-chlorinated or chlorine-free phenolic intermediates.
Cytotoxicity of TCS and its degradation byproducts
The present study revealed that the co-culture of B. licheniformis AEM2 and L. fusiformis AEM5 effectively degraded TCS. However, ensuring the environmental safety of biodegradation process requires that the resulting byproducts possess lower or no toxicity compared to the parent compound [39, 92, 93]. Therefore, the toxicity of TCS and its degradation products were investigated in this study.
The ethyl acetate extract from the culture was determined to contain 160 µg of substance. It was thought that this extract was mainly composed of the breakdown products of TCS, since only mineral salts were initially added to the medium. The extract was dissolved in 1 mL DMSO and this final material was used as a stock solution to analyze the breakdown products of TCS. Similarly, a stock solution of 160 µg TCS was prepared in 1 mL DMSO. Then, both stock solutions were diluted with 1% DMSO to prepare the dilutions at different concentrations (5–160 µg/mL DMSO). The toxicity of the prepared dilution samples was tested on L929 cells (mouse fibroblast cell line) by WST-1 cell viability assay. The cytotoxicity assesment demonstrated that in comparison to the control (no treatment), TCS treatment statistically decreased cell viability at all concentrations tested (p < 0.05). The cell viability was measured as 5% at the highest concentration (160 µg/mL) of TCS, while 81% cell viability was detected at the lowest concentration (5 µg/mL), indicating a concentration-dependent cytotoxic effect of TCS. In contrast to TCS, its degradation products did not cause a statistically significant decrease in cell viability within the concentration range of 5–80 µg/mL (p > 0.05). A marginal cytotoxic effect of degradation products was detected only at 160 µg/mL (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.

Toxicity analysis of TCS (a) and TCS degradation products (b) on fibroblasts for 24 h. Cells not exposed to TCS or its degradation products were considered as the control (C) group. Means of three independent experiments with triplicate replicates were calculated in GraphPad Prism 8.0 and presented as mean ± SD. (*) symbol indicates statistically significant changes. *p < 0.05 (significant); **p < 0.01 (highly significant); ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001 (highly significant)
In the literature, it has been documented that bacterial consortia can metabolize pollutants such as pesticides, personal care products and textile dyes, thereby causing a concomitant decrease in their cytotoxicity [39, 94, 95]. In consistent with the findings of previous studies, the findings of this study indicate that the co-culture metabolizes TCS into the metabolites with substantially lower cytotoxic potential. This situation, as indicated in previous studies, can be explained by the decrease in the Cl content of TCS and its conversion into smaller phenolic metabolites [11, 18, 96]. Collectively, these comparative data suggest that from a toxicological standpoint, the co-culture system of B. licheniformis AEM2 and L. fusiformis AEM5 appears to be a promising and environmentally safe candidate for bioremediation applications.
Biodegradation of TCS by co-coculture in non-sterile wastewater-based medium
Microbial biodegradation of organic pollutants can be achieved in non-sterile-culture processes [37, 40–44]. In a non-sterile culture process, wastewater medium is not sterilized and external contamination is not controlled during the biodegradation. Therefore, this process diminishes labor and energy consumption [33, 39]. However, there is no report on the bacterial degradation of TCS in a non-sterile process. Moreover, it is stated that in comparison to mono-cultures of microorganisms, their respective co-cultures show higher biodegradation ability under non-sterile conditions [24, 28–31, 37]. Accordingly, in the last step of this study, the TCS biodegradation potency of the co-culture was examined under non-sterile culture conditions that simulate the conditions of real biological treatment systems.
For this purpose, three different processes were designed. In all processes, the medium consisted of only wastewater and TCS (10 mg/L), without the addition of external carbon, nitrogen, mineral, or vitamin sources. This approach was selected to evaluate the feasibility of the designed process under nutrient-limited conditions, thereby reducing operational costs related with nutrient supplementation.
The first difference between the three processes was whether the medium was sterilized or not, and the second difference was whether co-culture was inoculated into the medium. In the process I, the medium was sterilized to kill endogenous microorganisms and then was inoculated with co-culture. In this process, it was aimed to evaluate the ability of the co-culture to degrade TCS under sterile conditions. In the process II, the medium was not sterilized and directly inoculated with the co-culture. The aim of using this process was to evaluate the TCS-degrading capacity of the co-culture under non-sterile conditions in the presence of endogenous microorganisms. In fact, the main process intended to be designed in the present study was process II. In the process III, the medium was not sterilized and the co-culture was not inoculated. The purpose of using process III was to evaluate the potency of the endogenous microorganisms of wastewater to degrade TCS. The HPLC measurements showed that TCS degradation was 98.77% in the process I, 88.55% in the process II, and 1.1% in the process III (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3S). A low degradation ratio of 1.1% in the process III may be explained by the presence of indigenous microorganisms in the wastewater. These results indicate a slight decrease in degradation efficiency under non-sterile conditions (Process II) compared to sterile conditions (Process I). However, the high removal rate of Process II (88.55%) demonstrates that the co-culture successfully competes with the indigenous microorganisms and maintains considerable biological degradation activity. This may be attributed to competition between the co-cultured microorganisms and the indigenous microorganisms of the wastewater environment in terms of factors such as dominance and access to the substrate.
Table 1.
TCS-degrading potential of co-culture under sterile and non-sterile conditions
| Process | External nutrients | Medium sterilization | Co-culture inoculation | Contamination control | Degradation ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Process I | – | + | + | + | 98.77 |
| Process II | – | – | + | – | 88.55 |
| Process III | – | – | – | – | 1.1 |
In all processes, the medium consisted only wastewater and 10 mg/L TCS. The initial pH of the media was not adjusted (the initial pH of the wastewater was 7.12). The flasks were incubated in a shaking incubator at 150 rpm for 72 h. The concentration of residual TCS in flasks was determined using HPLC. All statistical analyses were performed using concentration data (mg/L). However, degradation efficiency was presented as percentage removal for comparison clarity
The fact that Process II (88.55%) provided higher degradation efficacy than Process III (1.1%) indicates that the co-cultured bacteria suppressed indigenous microorganisms and dominated the wastewater environment. To support this finding, samples were taken from the cultures in Processes I, II, and III at the end of 72 h incubation period and spread onto TSA medium in petri dishes. After incubating petri dishes for 24 h, bacteria developing on TSA were examined for their colony and cell morphologies. The results revealed that the culture medium of process I contained only the colonies of the co-cultured B. licheniformis AEM2 and L. fusiformis AEM5. This situation may be attributed to the fact that the wastewater medium was subjected to a sterilization process before being inoculated with a co-culture of the two bacteria. It was determined that co-cultured B. licheniformis AEM2 and L. fusiformis AEM5 accounted for the majority of bacteria in the culture II (Process II), and there are only a few bacterial colonies originating from wastewater. The culture III (process III) contained only wastewater-derived bacteria, which have different cell and olony morphologies. These results suggest that the co-culture-based process II was able to suppress indigenous microorganisms in wastewater (Supplementary Fig. S4).
It is known that wastewater sterilization is not practical on an industrial scale, and its supplementation with external nutrients increases sludge production and downstream processing costs [39, 97]. The results from process II indicate that the co-culture was able to degrade TCS in wastewater medium without such interventions. Therefore, this finding may be significant from a scale-up and industrial application perspective. However, other operational parameters such as continuous-flow conditions, oxygen transfer efficiency, long-term microbial community dynamics and transformation products-mediated toxicity analysis should be also tested in future studies to validate the effectiveness of the co-culture-based process II. These interventions will contribute to the translation of laboratory findings into practical applications and the implementation of the designed co-culture system in real wastewater treatment systems.
Conclusions
In the present study, two triclosan-degrading bacterial strains belonging to Bacillus licheniformis and Lysinibacillus fusiformis were isolated from activated sludge samples taken from a wastewater treatment plant. The co-culture of two isolates were determined to have higher TCS-degrading capacity than their respective mono-cultures under the tested culture conditions. In vitro preliminary toxicity tests indicated that the degradation products of TCS did not cause toxic effects on skin fibroblasts within the tested concentration range. Additionally, the co-culture showed TCS-degrading potential in a wastewater-based medium designed to simulate real conditions of biological treatment systems. Preliminary degradation tests also suggested that the co-culture may perform TCS degradation in a wastewater-based medium without pH, temperature, sterilization control, and nutrient supplementation. However, further studies are necessary to confirm its operational performance, cost-effectiveness and environmental safety under real wastewater treatment conditions. Overall, this study provide a basis for future studies exploring the development of microbial co-culture-based strategies for the removal of TCS.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Author contributions
E.D., M.T. and H.O. performed the experiments. E.D. prepared Figures and Tables. E.D. and H.O. wrote the main manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK). This study was supported by Ataturk University (Erzurum, Turkey), project no FDK-2022-10153.
Data availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the manuscript and supplementary material.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval
This manuscript does not have any ethical issues related to human and animal subjects, as confrmed by all of the authors.
Consent for publication
All authors have ready to submit in Bioprocess and Biosystems engineering.
Consent to participate
All listed authors have approved the manuscript.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Elanur Dasdemir, Email: elanur.tuysuz@atauni.edu.tr.
Hakan Ozkan, Email: hakanozkan@atauni.edu.tr.
References
- 1.Baena-Nogueras RM, González-Mazo E, Lara-Martín PA (2017) Degradation kinetics of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in surface waters: photolysis vs biodegradation. Sci Total Environ 590–591:643–654. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Thelusmond J-R, Strathmann TJ, Cupples AM (2019) Carbamazepine, triclocarban and triclosan biodegradation and the phylotypes and functional genes associated with xenobiotic degradation in four agricultural soils. Sci Total Environ 657:1138–1149. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu N, Jin X, Feng C et al (2020) Ecological risk assessment of fifty pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in Chinese surface waters: a proposed multiple-level system. Environ Int 136:105454. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hena S, Gutierrez L, Croué J-P (2021) Removal of pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) from wastewater using microalgae: a review. J Hazard Mater 403:124041. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lolas IB, Chen X, Bester K, Nielsen JL (2012) Identification of triclosan-degrading bacteria using stable isotope probing, fluorescence in situ hybridization and microautoradiography. Microbiology 158:2796–2804. 10.1099/mic.0.061077-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chen X, Zhuang J, Bester K (2018) Degradation of triclosan by environmental microbial consortia and by axenic cultures of microorganisms with concerns to wastewater treatment. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:5403–5417. 10.1007/s00253-018-9029-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Weatherly LM, Gosse JA (2017) Triclosan exposure, transformation, and human health effects. J Toxicol Environ Heal Part B 20:447–469. 10.1080/10937404.2017.1399306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Luo N, Chen J, Chen X et al (2024) Toxicity evolution of triclosan during environmental transformation and human metabolism: misgivings in the post-pandemic era. Environ Int 190:108927. 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yueh M-F, He F, Chen C et al (2020) Triclosan leads to dysregulation of the metabolic regulator FGF21 exacerbating high fat diet-induced nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci 117:31259–31266. 10.1073/pnas.2017129117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huang W, Xie P, Cai Z (2020) Lipid metabolism disorders contribute to hepatotoxicity of triclosan in mice. J Hazard Mater 384:121310. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Orvos DR, Versteeg DJ, Inauen J et al (2002) Aquatic toxicity of triclosan. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1338–1349. 10.1002/etc.5620210703 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang J, Ma N, Mo G et al (2025) Hazards and health risks of the antibacterial agent triclosan to fish: a review. J Xenobiotics 15:204. 10.3390/jox15060204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bedoux G, Roig B, Thomas O et al (2012) Occurrence and toxicity of antimicrobial triclosan and by-products in the environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:1044–1065. 10.1007/s11356-011-0632-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jiang Y, Liu L, Jin B et al (2024) Critical review on the environmental behaviors and toxicity of triclosan and its removal technologies. Sci Total Environ 932:173013. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Thelusmond J-R, Kawka E, Strathmann TJ, Cupples AM (2018) Diclofenac, carbamazepine and triclocarban biodegradation in agricultural soils and the microorganisms and metabolic pathways affected. Sci Total Environ 640–641:1393–1410. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Luo Z, He Y, Zhi D et al (2019) Current progress in treatment techniques of triclosan from wastewater: a review. Sci Total Environ 696:133990. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133990 [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yun H, Liang B, Kong D et al (2020) Fate, risk and removal of triclocarban: a critical review. J Hazard Mater 387:121944. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121944 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang Y, Liang W (2021) Occurrence, toxicity, and removal methods of triclosan: a timely review. Curr Pollut Rep 7:31–39. 10.1007/s40726-021-00173-9 [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang S, Yin Y, Wang J (2018) Microbial degradation of triclosan by a novel strain of Dyella sp. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:1997–2006. 10.1007/s00253-018-8740-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kumari R, Ghosh Sachan S (2019) Bioconversion of toxic micropollutant triclosan to 2,4-dichlorophenol using a wastewater isolate Pseudomonas aeruginosa KS2002. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16:7663–7672. 10.1007/s13762-018-2129-5 [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kumari R, Ghosh Sachan S, Sachan A (2022) Exploring triclosan degradation potential of Citrobacter freundii KS2003. Int J Environ Sci Technol 19:3565–3580. 10.1007/s13762-021-03305-2 [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li S-W, Huang Y-X, Liu M-Y (2020) Transcriptome profiling reveals the molecular processes for survival of Lysinibacillus fusiformis strain 15 – 4 in petroleum environments. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 192:110250. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ghafouri M, Pourjafar F, Ghobadi Nejad Z, Yaghmaei S (2023) Biological treatment of triclosan using a novel strain of Enterobacter cloacae and introducing naphthalene dioxygenase as an effective enzyme. J Hazard Mater 459:131833. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131833 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Khanpour-Alikelayeh E, Partovinia A (2021) Synergistic and antagonistic effects of microbial co-culture on bioremediation of polluted environments. pp 229–265
- 25.Espinosa-Ortiz EJ, Rene ER, Gerlach R (2022) Potential use of fungal-bacterial co-cultures for the removal of organic pollutants. Crit Rev Biotechnol 42:361–383. 10.1080/07388551.2021.1940831 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kamyabi A, Nouri H, Moghimi H (2017) Synergistic effect of Sarocladium sp. and Cryptococcus sp. co-culture on crude oil biodegradation and biosurfactant production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 182:324–334. 10.1007/s12010-016-2329-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jia X, He Y, Jiang D et al (2019) Construction and analysis of an engineered Escherichia coli-Pseudomonas aeruginosa co-culture consortium for phenanthrene bioremoval. Biochem Eng J 148:214–223. 10.1016/j.bej.2019.05.010 [Google Scholar]
- 28.Atakpa EO, Zhou H, Jiang L et al (2023) Co-culture of Acinetobacter sp. and Scedosporium sp. immobilized beads for optimized biosurfactant production and degradation of crude oil. Environ Pollut 335:122365. 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122365 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.He J, Zhang K, Wang L et al (2022) Highly efficient degradation of cypermethrin by a co-culture of Rhodococcus sp. JQ-L and Comamonas sp. A-3. Front Microbiol. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1003820 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Angeles-de Paz G, Ledezma-Villanueva A, Robledo-Mahón T et al (2023) Assembled mixed co-cultures for emerging pollutant removal using native microorganisms from sewage sludge. Chemosphere 313:137472. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137472 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lin Q, Yang Y, Zhang S et al (2024) Enhanced biodegradation of polychlorinated biphenyls by co-cultivation of resuscitated strains with unique advantages. Environ Res 261:119699. 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Arslan NP, Aydogan MN, Taskin M (2016) Citric acid production from partly deproteinized whey under non-sterile culture conditions using immobilized cells of lactose—positive and cold-adapted Yarrowia lipolytica B9. J Biotechnol 231:32–39. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.05.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Taskin M, Ortucu S, Aydogan MN, Arslan NP (2016) Lipid production from sugar beet molasses under non-aseptic culture conditions using the oleaginous yeast Rhodotorula glutinis TR29. Renew Energy 99:198–204. 10.1016/j.renene.2016.06.060 [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tuysuz E, Gonul-Baltaci N, Omeroglu MA et al (2020) Co-production of amylase and protease by locally isolated thermophilic bacterium Anoxybacillus rupiensis T2 in sterile and non-sterile media using waste potato peels as substrate. Waste Biomass Valoriz 11:6793–6802. 10.1007/s12649-020-00936-3 [Google Scholar]
- 35.Komesli S, Akbulut S, Arslan NP et al (2021) Waste frying oil hydrolysis and lipase production by cold-adapted Pseudomonas yamanorum LP2 under non-sterile culture conditions. Environ Technol 42:3245–3253. 10.1080/09593330.2020.1745297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bacha A-U-R, Nabi I, Zaheer M et al (2023) Biodegradation of macro- and micro-plastics in environment: a review on mechanism, toxicity, and future perspectives. Sci Total Environ 858:160108. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Baltaci MO, Omeroglu MA, Ozkan H et al (2024) Enhanced biodegradation of crude oil contamination by indigenous bacterial consortium under real conditions. Biocatal Biotransform 42:56–67. 10.1080/10242422.2023.2231592 [Google Scholar]
- 38.Taskin M, Saghafian A, Aydogan MN, Arslan NP (2015) Microbial lipid production by cold-adapted oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica B9 in non‐sterile whey medium. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining 9:595–605. 10.1002/bbb.1560 [Google Scholar]
- 39.Omeroglu MA, Bakan B, Baltaci MO et al (2025) Biodegradation of benzophenone-3 in non-sterile culture process using Klebsiella huaxiensis W2. Water Air Soil Pollut 236:106. 10.1007/s11270-025-07744-2 [Google Scholar]
- 40.Svobodová K, Novotný Č (2018) Bioreactors based on immobilized fungi: bioremediation under non-sterile conditions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:39–46. 10.1007/s00253-017-8575-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Krainara S, Suraraksa B, Prommeenate P et al (2020) Enrichment and characterization of bacterial consortia for degrading 2-mercaptobenzothiazole in rubber industrial wastewater. J Hazard Mater 400:123291. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Guo Y, Huang Y, Pang S et al (2021) Novel mechanism and kinetics of tetramethrin degradation using an indigenous gordonia cholesterolivorans A16. Int J Mol Sci 22:9242. 10.3390/ijms22179242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kamal IM, Abdeltawab NF, Ragab YM et al (2022) Biodegradation, decolorization, and detoxification of Di-Azo dye direct red 81 by halotolerant, alkali-thermo-tolerant bacterial mixed cultures. Microorganisms 10:994. 10.3390/microorganisms10050994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tayar S, Losantos D, Villagra J et al (2024) Biodegradation of tri-butyl phosphate by Trametes versicolor and its application in a trickle bed reactor under non-sterile conditions. Environ Technol Innov 36:103867. 10.1016/j.eti.2024.103867 [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wyllie GR (2015) Spectroscopic determination of triclosan concentration in a series of antibacterial soaps: a first-year undergraduate laboratory experiment. J Chem Educ 92(1):153–156 [Google Scholar]
- 46.Taieb I, Ben Younes S, Messai B et al (2021) Isolation, characterization and identification of a new Lysinibacillus fusiformis strain ZC from metlaoui phosphate laundries wastewater: bio-treatment assays. Sustainability 13:10072. 10.3390/su131810072 [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chopra S, Kumar D (2023) Characterization and biodegradation of paracetamol by biomass of Bacillus licheniformis strain PPY-2 isolated from wastewater. Rend Lincei Sci Fis e Nat 34:491–501. 10.1007/s12210-023-01140-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Muras A, Romero M, Mayer C, Otero A (2021) Biotechnological applications of Bacillus licheniformis. Crit Rev Biotechnol 41:609–627. 10.1080/07388551.2021.1873239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.He H, Zhang Y, Shi G, Li Y (2023) Recent biotechnological advances and future prospective of Bacillus licheniformis as microbial cell factories. Syst Microbiol Biomanufacturing 3:521–532. 10.1007/s43393-023-00162-7 [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ahsan N, Shimizu M (2021) Lysinibacillus species: their potential as effective bioremediation, biostimulant, and biocontrol agents. Rev Agric Sci 9:103–116. 10.7831/ras.9.0_103 [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mathivanan K, Chandirika JU, Vinothkanna A et al (2021) Characterization and biotechnological functional activities of exopolysaccharides produced by Lysinibacillus fusiformis KMNTT-10. J Polym Environ 29:1742–1751. 10.1007/s10924-020-01986-3 [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jha Y, Mohamed HI (2023) Inoculation with Lysinibacillus fusiformis strain YJ4 and Lysinibacillus sphaericus strain YJ5 alleviates the effects of cold stress in maize plants. Gesunde Pflanz 75:77–95. 10.1007/s10343-022-00666-7 [Google Scholar]
- 53.Huang J, Li J, Wang G (2016) Production of a microcapsule agent of chromate-reducing Lysinibacillus fusiformis ZC1 and its application in remediation of chromate-spiked soil. Springerplus 5:561. 10.1186/s40064-016-2177-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.El-Sheshtawy HS, Ahmed W (2017) Bioremediation of crude oil by Bacillus licheniformis in the presence of different concentration nanoparticles and produced biosurfactant. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:1603–1614. 10.1007/s13762-016-1190-1 [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sari IP, Simarani K (2019) Decolorization of selected azo dye by Lysinibacillus fusiformis W1B6: biodegradation optimization, isotherm, and kinetic study biosorption mechanism. Adsorpt Sci Technol 37:492–508. 10.1177/0263617419848897 [Google Scholar]
- 56.Biswas JK, Banerjee A, Sarkar B et al (2020) Exploration of an extracellular polymeric substance from earthworm gut bacterium (Bacillus licheniformis) for bioflocculation and heavy metal removal potential. Appl Sci 10:349. 10.3390/app10010349 [Google Scholar]
- 57.Cvetnić M, Bolanča T, Markić M et al (2021) Bioremediation of MP-polluted waters using bacteria Bacillus licheniformis, Lysinibacillus massiliensis, and mixed culture of Bacillus sp. and Delftia acidovorans. Chem Biochem Eng Q 35:205–224. 10.15255/CABEQ.2021.1915 [Google Scholar]
- 58.Li M, Zhao X, Zhang X et al (2018) Biodegradation of 17β-estradiol by Bacterial Co-culture Isolated from Manure. Sci Rep 8:3787. 10.1038/s41598-018-22169-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hong Y, Sun G, Sun S et al (2024) Enhancement of triclocarban biodegradation: metabolic division of labor in co-culture of Rhodococcus sp. BX2 and Pseudomonas sp. LY-1. Environ Pollut 356:124346. 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wu B, Xiu J, Yu L et al (2023) Degradation of crude oil in a co-culture system of Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Microbiol. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1132831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 61.Yuan B, Yao J, Wang Z et al (2022) Increasing N,N-dimethylacetamide degradation and mineralization efficiency by co-culture of Rhodococcus ruber HJM-8 and Paracoccus communis YBH-X. Chemosphere 303:134935. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zhang J, Bing W, Hu T et al (2023) Enhanced biodegradation of phenol by microbial collaboration: resistance, metabolite utilization, and pH stabilization. Environ Res 238:117269. 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bing W, Li X, Zhao Y et al (2024) Collaboration of bacterial consortia for biodegradation of high concentration phenol and potential application of machine learning. Chem Biol Interact 399:111153. 10.1016/j.cbi.2024.111153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Balakrishnan P, Mohan S (2021) Treatment of triclosan through enhanced microbial biodegradation. J Hazard Mater 420:126430. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Li X, Hu X, Zhao X et al (2022) Biodegradation of triclosan by novel isolated Bacillus Sp. Dl4: performance evaluation, rsm optimization and metagenomics analysis. SSRN Electron J. 10.2139/ssrn.4165230 [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kim Y-M, Murugesan K, Schmidt S et al (2011) Triclosan susceptibility and co-metabolism – a comparison for three aerobic pollutant-degrading bacteria. Bioresour Technol 102:2206–2212. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Mulla SI, Hu A, Wang Y et al (2016) Degradation of triclocarban by a triclosan-degrading Sphingomonas sp. strain YL-JM2C. Chemosphere 144:292–296. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.08.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Agrawal N, Verma P, Shahi SK (2018) Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (phenanthrene and pyrene) by the ligninolytic fungi Ganoderma lucidum isolated from the hardwood stump. Bioresour Bioprocess 5:11. 10.1186/s40643-018-0197-5 [Google Scholar]
- 69.Zainith S, Chowdhary P, Mani S, Mishra S (2020) Microbial ligninolytic enzymes and their role in bioremediation. Chowdhary P, Raj A, Verma D, Akhter Y. Microorganisms for Sustainable Environment and Health. Elsevier, pp 179–203
- 70.Dhagat S, Jujjavarapu SE (2022) Utility of lignin-modifying enzymes: a green technology for organic compound mycodegradation. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 97:343–358. 10.1002/jctb.6807 [Google Scholar]
- 71.Islam NF, Borah D, Saikia R et al (2026) Microbial dehalogenation of halogenated organic pollutants: a review. Environ Chem Lett 24:101–137. 10.1007/s10311-025-01880-1 [Google Scholar]
- 72.Arora PK (2010) Application of monooxygenases in dehalogenation, desulphurization, denitrification and hydroxylation of aromatic compounds. J Bioremediat Biodegrad. 10.4172/2155-6199.1000112
- 73.Guengerich FP, Yoshimoto FK (2018) Formation and cleavage of C–C bonds by enzymatic oxidation–reduction reactions. Chem Rev 118:6573–6655. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Furukawa K (2006) Oxygenases and dehalogenases: molecular approaches to efficient degradation of chlorinated environmental pollutants. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 70:2335–2348. 10.1271/bbb.60218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ang T-F, Maiangwa J, Salleh AB et al (2018) Dehalogenases: from improved performance to potential microbial dehalogenation applications. Molecules 23:1100. 10.3390/molecules23051100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Castle LA, Siehl DL, Gorton R et al (2004) Discovery and directed evolution of a glyphosate tolerance gene. Science (80-) 304:1151–1154. 10.1126/science.1096770 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Rojas-Aparicio A, Rojas-Aparicio A, Hernández-Eligio JA et al (2018) Research Article Genetic expression of pobA and fabHB in Bacillus licheniformis M2-7 in the presence of benzo[a]pyrene. Genet Mol Res. 10.4238/gmr16039916
- 78.Phetcharat T, Dawkrajai P, Chitov T et al (2019) Biosurfactant-producing capability and prediction of functional genes potentially beneficial to microbial enhanced oil recovery in indigenous bacterial communities of an onshore oil reservoir. Curr Microbiol 76:382–391. 10.1007/s00284-019-01641-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ouyang B, Xu W, Zhang W et al (2022) Efficient removal of sulfonamides and tetracyclines residues by the laccase-mediator system employing a novel laccase from Lysinibacillus fusiformis. J Environ Chem Eng 10:108809. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.108809 [Google Scholar]
- 80.Diabankana RGC, Zhamalbekova AA, Shakirova AE et al (2024) Genomic insights of wheat root-associated lysinibacillus fusiformis reveal its related functional traits for bioremediation of soil contaminated with petroleum products. Microorganisms 12:2377. 10.3390/microorganisms12112377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Dai H, Gao J, Wang S et al (2020) The key active degrader, metabolic pathway and microbial ecology of triclosan biodegradation in an anoxic/oxic system. Bioresour Technol 317:124014. 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Yin Y, Wu H, Jiang Z et al (2022) Degradation of triclosan in the water environment by microorganisms: a review. Microorganisms 10:1713. 10.3390/microorganisms10091713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Liu Q, Zhu J, Wang L et al (2023) Interpreting the degradation mechanism of triclosan in microbial fuel cell by combining analysis microbiome community and degradation pathway. Chemosphere 321:137983. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ertit Taştan B, Özdemir C, Tekinay T (2016) Effects of different culture media on biodegradation of triclosan by Rhodotorula mucilaginosa and Penicillium sp. Water Sci Technol 74:473–481. 10.2166/wst.2016.221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Tian H, Ma YJ, Li WY, Wang JW (2018) Efficient degradation of triclosan by an endophytic fungus Penicillium oxalicum B4. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:8963–8975. 10.1007/s11356-017-1186-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Wang S, Hu J, Wang J (2023) Simultaneous removal of triclosan and nitrate by a stable denitrifying microbial consortium. J Environ Chem Eng 11:109387. 10.1016/j.jece.2023.109387 [Google Scholar]
- 87.Field JA, Sierra-Alvarez R (2008) Microbial degradation of chlorinated phenols. Rev Environ Sci Bio/Technology 7:211–241. 10.1007/s11157-007-9124-5 [Google Scholar]
- 88.Lee DG, Zhao F, Rezenom YH et al (2012) Biodegradation of triclosan by a wastewater microorganism. Water Res 46:4226–4234. 10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Arora P, Bae H (2014) Bacterial degradation of chlorophenols and their derivatives. Microb Cell Fact 13:31. 10.1186/1475-2859-13-31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Zharikova NV, Korobov VV, Zhurenko EI (2022) Flavin-dependent monooxygenases involved in bacterial degradation of chlorophenols. Appl Biochem Microbiol 58:677–691. 10.1134/S0003683822060175 [Google Scholar]
- 91.Pan L, Yuan B, Li Q et al (2024) Efficient biodegradation of chlorobenzene via monooxygenation pathways by Pandoraea sp. XJJ-1 with high potential for groundwater bioremediation. Int Microbiol 28:355–364. 10.1007/s10123-024-00544-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Garcia-Segura S, Brillas E (2017) Applied photoelectrocatalysis on the degradation of organic pollutants in wastewaters. J Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev 31:1–35. 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2017.01.005 [Google Scholar]
- 93.Sharma A, Ahmad J, Flora SJS (2018) Application of advanced oxidation processes and toxicity assessment of transformation products. Environ Res 167:223–233. 10.1016/j.envres.2018.07.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Perruchon C, Pantoleon A, Veroutis D et al (2017) Characterization of the biodegradation, bioremediation and detoxification capacity of a bacterial consortium able to degrade the fungicide thiabendazole. Biodegradation 28:383–394. 10.1007/s10532-017-9803-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Elnabi MKA, Ghazy MA, Ali SS et al (2025) Efficient biodegradation and detoxification of reactive black 5 using a newly constructed bacterial consortium. Microb Cell Fact 24:154. 10.1186/s12934-025-02768-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Chen Y, Chen Y, Jia J, Yan B (2022) Triclosan detoxification through dechlorination and oxidation via microbial Pd-NPs under aerobic conditions. Chemosphere 286:131836. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Razzak SA (2024) Recent advances in sustainable biological nutrient removal from municipal wastewater. Clean Water 2:100047. 10.1016/j.clwat.2024.100047 [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the manuscript and supplementary material.




