Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1978 May;29(3):419–430. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-419

Time allocation in concurrent schedules: the effect of signalled reinforcement1

Henry Marcucella, Garry Margolius
PMCID: PMC1332840  PMID: 16812066

Abstract

The responses of five pigeons were reinforced on concurrent variable-interval variable-interval reinforcement schedules in which changeover key responses changed the stimulus and reinforcement schedules associated with the food key. While the reinforcement availability in one component remained unchanged throughout the experiment, the reinforcement availability in the other component was, during several conditions, signalled by the onset of an additional discriminative stimulus. During unsignalled conditions, both the relative frequency of responding and the relative time spent in each component approximated the obtained relative reinforcement frequency in each component. The effect of signalling reinforcer availability in one component was to (1) reduce responding in the signalled component to near-zero levels, and (2) increase the relative time in the unsignalled component, without a corresponding increase in the obtained relative reinforcement frequency. The magnitude of the increase in relative time in the unsignalled component decreased as the overall frequency of reinforcement increased. This deviation in the matching relation between relative time and the obtained relative reinforcement frequency was eliminated if the overall reinforcement frequency was increased before the signal was introduced and then, without removing the signal, gradually reduced.

Keywords: matching, signalled reinforcement, time allocation, fixed-ratio changeover requirement, concurrent schedules, key peck, pigeons

Full text

PDF
419

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Badia P., Culbertson S., Lewis P. The relative aversiveness of signalled vs unsignalled avoidance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jul;16(1):113–121. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Badia P., Culbertson S. The relative aversiveness of signalled vs unsignalled escapable and inescapable shock. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 May;17(3):463–471. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baum W. M., Rachlin H. C. Choice as time allocation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):861–874. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brownstein A. J. Concurrent schedules of response-independent reinforcement: duration of a reinforcing stimulus. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Mar;15(2):211–214. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brownstein A. J., Pliskoff S. S. Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):683–688. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CATANIA A. C. Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:253–263. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Catania A. C., Reynolds G. S. A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3 Suppl):327–383. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-s327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Findley J. D. Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Apr;1(2):123–144. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Guilkey M., Shull R. L., Brownstein A. J. Response-rate invariance in concurrent schedules: effects of different changeover contingencies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Jul;24(1):43–52. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HERRNSTEIN R. J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:267–272. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LUTZ R. E., PERKINS C. C., Jr A time variable in the acquisition of observing responses. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1960 Apr;53:180–182. doi: 10.1037/h0042564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lewis P., Lewin L., Muehleisen P., Stoyak M. Preference for signalled reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):143–150. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Marcucella H. Signalled reinforcement and multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Sep;26(2):199–206. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. PROKASY W. F., Jr The acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential external reinforcement. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1956 Apr;49(2):131–134. doi: 10.1037/h0046740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wilkie D. M. Signalled reinforcement in multiple and concurrent schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jul;20(1):29–36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES