Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2026 Jun 25;12:141. Originally published 2023 Feb 7. [Version 4] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.121922.4

Exploring potential strategies to enhance memory and cognition in aging mice

Shreevatsa Bhat M 1, Ramesh Babu M G 1, Anandh Dhanushkodi 2, Prof Kiranmai S Rai 1,a
PMCID: PMC13329362  PMID: 42404620

Version Changes

Revised. Amendments from Version 3

This revised version incorporates changes made in response to reviewers' comments, including revisions to the Introduction and Discussion sections, addition of supporting references, methodological clarifications, and inclusion of a schematic diagram of the experimental protocol.

Abstract

Background

Aging population is rapidly expanding worldwide, and age-related cognitive impairments prove detrimental for achieving a better productive and quality of life. Lack of effective therapies for age-related cognitive impairment focuses attention on developing preventive strategies, such as nutritional interventions, cell therapies and environmental manipulations. The objective of the present study was to explore the comparative benefits of potential memory-enhancing strategies like supplementation of choline (Ch) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) or administration of human embryonic kidney stem cell conditioned media (HEK-CM) or exposure to environmental enrichment (EE), that attenuates cognitive impairments in aging mice.

Methods

Twelve-month-old CF1 male mice were subdivided [n=6/group] into normal aging control (NAC), saline vehicle control (SVC), Ch-DHA, EE, heat-inactivated HEK-CM (HIHEK-CM) and HEK-CM groups. Spatial working and reference memory were assessed using an eight-arm radial maze test and recognition memory using a novel object recognition test (NORT).

Results

Spatial memory and recognition were decreased in normal aging mice. Aged mice exposed to dietary Ch-DHA or HEK-CM showed significant enhancement in spatial learning tasks, and recognition memory compared to the same in age-matched NAC mice. Ch-DHA and HEK-CM treated mice committed significantly lesser reference memory errors and attained a higher percentage of correct choices in spatial learning and memory tasks. Moreover, on testing for recognition memory in NORT, significantly higher number of visits to the novel object was observed in Ch-DHA supplemented and HEK-CM administered aging mice whereas HEK-CM and EE mice groups showed significantly greater number of visits to familiar object, when compared to same in age-matched NAC and HIHEK-CM groups, respectively.

Conclusion

Supplementation of Ch-DHA and HEK-CM treatment strategies have a higher potential [~ 20—30%] for enhancing spatial learning, and recognition memory in normal aged mice, whereas exposure to EE seems to enhance only their short-term memory.

Keywords: Aging, cognition, spatial memory, choline, and DHA, enriched environment, and HEK cell-conditioned media

Introduction

Normal aging is associated with a decline or functional deficits in multiple physiological domains, including cognitive functions. Cognitive abilities crucially determine successful/healthy aging and their impairment during aging specifically affects the quality of life and reduces productivity in elderly individuals. The growing burden of cognitive loss in rapidly increasing aging populations is shouldered not only by elderly patients and their family members but also by country/worldwide health care organizations. Although some mental functions such as general knowledge, numerical and verbal abilities are less affected during aging, other mental abilities like short-term memory, working memory, reasoning, processing speed, and executive functions weaken from middle age onwards or before. 1 , 2 Age-related learning and memory impairments are due to neuronal deficits that are associated with hippocampal damage. Age-related changes in cognitive ability are also attributed to altered hippocampal function. 3 All cognitive functions are not equally affected by aging, and it is also reported that functions like delayed recall of verbal information, 4 short-term recall, working memory 5 and spatial memory 6 decline with aging. Lack of effective disease-modifying therapies for age-related cognitive impairment seeks increasing attention on preventive strategies, such as nutritional interventions, cell therapies and environmental manipulations. Nutritional intervention has a major role in preventing/delaying deficits observed on neuronal function in aging such as cognitive ability and behavior. Important nutrients like choline (Ch) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) are required for normal brain function in humans and animals. Ch is derived from diet and by de novo synthesis in liver. 7 It is essential for membrane structural integrity, methyl group metabolism and neurotransmitter synthesis. 8 In rodents, maternal intake of Ch during gestation increases nerve cell proliferation and decreases apoptosis of fetal hippocampal neural progenitor cells, 9 enhances long-term potentiation in the hippocampus, and improves the auditory and visuospatial memory throughout their life. In adult rats, Ch supplementation improves cognitive abilities 10 and enhances the temporal memory. 11 DHA supplementation increases the level of synaptic proteins and membrane phospholipid in the hippocampal neurons 12 and enhances cognitive activities. 13 Several studies report that DHA deficiency may have an increased risk of developing cognitive disorders such as dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. 14 16 Furthermore, combined supplementation with Ch and DHA has been shown to enhance hippocampal development and improve learning and memory performance more effectively than either nutrient alone. 35 , 36 Furthermore, combined supplementation of Ch and DHA has been reported to exert complementary and potentially synergistic effects on brain development and function. Their interaction in phosphatidylcholine synthesis and neuronal membrane formation may contribute to enhanced synaptic plasticity and cognitive performance. 51 Given the contribution of cellular senescence to age-related functional decline, considerable efforts have been directed toward developing therapeutic strategies to preserve or restore neural function during aging. Cellular senescence refers to the loss of cellular proliferative capacity and is considered an important contributor to tissue and organismal aging. 17 Further, currently, cell and cell-derived therapies are emerging as potential modes for treating various brain diseases/neurological disorders. Significant findings indicate that stem cell-based therapies potentiate functional recovery of neurological injury or neural disorders in animals. 18 21 Embryonic stem cells provide great potential for cell-based therapy in the field of regenerative medicine. 22 , 23 Alternatively, embryonic stem cells derived conditioned medium has been shown to be beneficial mainly through their chemical factors, for cell proliferation and tissue regeneration. 24 , 25 Moreover, studies also show that environmental enrichment (EE) impacts the brain positively by exposure to varying and stimulating physical and social surroundings. Increased rates of synaptic formation in the brain and improved activity have been observed when exposed to richer and stimulating surroundings. Studies in aged rats show that EE exposure results in permanent neuronal plasticity in the hippocampus and prevents age-associated impairments of spatial learning. 26 Daily exposure to EE in old rodents revealed its stimulating effect on neurogenesis possibly by increasing the survival rate of new neurons till their maturity. 27 , 28 Long-term exposure to EE in aged mice results in overall enhancement in cognitive ability. This proposes that long-term EE could provide cognitive stabilization. 29

Although these studies indicate the potential of each of the aforementioned therapies for improving cognitive functions and memory, no studies have explored comparing these beneficial strategies to identify the best in preventing normal age-associated decline in cognition and memory functions. Thus, the objective of the present study was to explore and identify the comparative potential memory-enhancing benefits of supplementation of Ch-DHA or administration of human embryonic kidney stem cell conditioned media (HEK-CM) or exposure to EE, in preventing normal age-associated decline in spacial learning and recognition memory functions of normal aging CF1 mice. The benefits of using the CF1 mouse species as an animal model include its suitability for general multipurpose models, safety and efficacy testing, as well as these mice have been extensively employed in diverse neuroscience research studies worldwide. One of the key advantages lies in their genetic makeup, which bears a closer resemblance to human genes. 30

Methods

Animals

Approval for the study was obtained from Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee [No. IAEC/KMC/107/2014], MAHE, Manipal. All experiments were carried out in accordance with guidelines provided by the IAEC and CPCSEA, Government of India. A total of 36 middle-aged (12 to 15-months-old) CF1 male mice housed in Central animal house research facility, MAHE, Manipal, were used for the study. Male mice were selected as a highly sensitive experimental model for choline-containing supplementation because they lack the estrogen driven endogenous choline synthesis mediated by the phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase pathway in females, making them significantly more responsive to dietary choline alterations. 52 Experiment was conducted in 44 days including 30 days of intervention period and 14 days of behaviour analysis. During 44 days of experimental period [09/03/2019 to 22/04/2019], 4 to 6 mice were housed and bedded in standard polypropylene cages containing paddy husk as bedding material that was replaced every two days. Standard lab conditions, with temperatures ranging between 23±2°C, humidity (50±5%), and 12 hrs light-dark cycle were maintained for all the mice. Pellet feed with Ch content of 1 mg/kg, procured from VRK Nutritional Solutions [VRK’s “Scientist’s Choice” Laboratory Animal Diets, Pune] and water ad libitum were freely accessible to these mice. As expected, 10 to 15% of mortality was observed in the mice due to ageing.

Experimental groups

Middle-aged male CF1 mice were randomly grouped [n=6/group] into normal aging control (NAC), saline vehicle control (SVC), Ch-DHA, HEK-CM, heat inactivated HEK-CM (HIHEK-CM) and EE groups. The NAC mice group remained undisturbed in the home cage throughout the 30 days interventional period of the experiment. The SVC group mice (included only for eight arm radial maze test) were fed equi-volume of saline for 30 days, Ch-DHA group mice were fed 45mg/kg body weight of Ch and 300mg/kg body weight of DHA for 30 days, HEK-CM group of mice were injected 100 μL of HEK-CM and HIHEK-CM group mice were injected 100 μL of heat inactivated HEK-CM through intravenous (tail vein) injections for 5 days, specifically on the 1 st, 6 th, 11 th, 16 th and 21 st day of the experimental period and EE group of mice were exposed to enriched environment for 30 days.

HEK-CM derivation

Cryopreserved 293T cells, which are derived from human embryonic kidney (HEK), were rapidly thawed at 37°C. HEK cells from a cryovial which contained dimethyl sulfoxide were transferred to a centrifuge tube (15 mL) and 5 mL of HEK media (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium-high glucose) was added along with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin-streptomycin, 1% nonessential amino acids and 1% of 200 mmol/L L-glutamate and centrifuged at 1800 rpm for 5 min. After discarding the supernatant, the pellets were re-suspended in 3 mL of HEK media and the cell suspension was then transferred into 25-cm 2 culture flasks to incubate with 5% CO 2 at 37°C for 24 hrs. The HEK cells were grown until they attained a confluency of 70 to 80%. HEK-CM, the conditioned media in which the HEK cells were grown was stored at -80°C for further use. HIHEK-CM was used as the vehicle control for HEK-CM and was prepared by subjecting HEK-CM to heat inactivation at 60°C in a water bath for 30 minutes, followed by cooling to room temperature. This process was employed to ensure that HIHEK-CM has no cognitive effects, as the heat treatment inactivates all the protein constituents of HEK-CM.

Environmental enrichment

For the enriched condition large wire-mesh cages (70 × 70 × 45 cm) were provided with various objects (toys), which were changed daily. These consisted of small mazes, ladders, running wheels, swings, plastic and metal cubes, spheres, cylinders, and trays of small objects, that could be carried about by the mice.

Eight-arm radial maze test

The eight-arm radial maze is an elevated plexiform maze placed 80 cm above the floor. It consists of an octagonal central platform from which equally spaced eight arms (each arm is 42 cm long, 11.4 cm high, and 11.4 cm wide) radiate and has a video monitor attached to a computer. After 30 days of treatment, mice were semi-starved for 2 days to reduce their body weight up to 85% and then subjected to eight arm radial maze test for 10 days, which consisted of 2 days of habituation phase followed by 4 days each of acquisition and retention phases.

During the habituation/orientation phase, all the eight arms were baited with food pellets and mice were allowed to orient and get habituated to the maze during two trials per day carried out for 2 days.

Acquisition phase of a spatial task is conducted following habituation in the radial maze. During this phase, bait of food pellets was placed only in four arms. Prior to each trial and each session, the maze was wiped with 70% ethanol to avoid any olfactory cues. The mice were placed in the centre of the maze and allowed to explore the maze freely. The mice were trained to take the food from baited arm without making a re-entry into the already visited arm. The trial was ended when the mice have taken the food from all four baited arms or after 5 min if mice did not visit the baited arms. During the trial, the animal’s performance was monitored and the number of entries into the arms were noted. Each mouse was given two trials per day for 4 days. The performance of the animal was scored by calculating the percentage of correct responses (a correct entry is the animal’s number of first visits to the baited arms) divided by the total number of entries made by the animal. Re-entries into previously visited baited arms were counted as working memory errors and entries into the unbaited arms were taken as reference memory errors.

Retention phase of spatial task in the radial maze: Subsequent to learning/acquisition phase, mice were retained in their individual cages for 4 days without any training. In order to assess the retention of the learned/acquired task, the performance of mice in the radial maze was again assessed for a single trial on the 4 th day. The experimental protocol remained same as that for the acquisition test.

Novel object recognition test (NORT)

The cognitive functions of mice were assessed by using NORT. Rodents have an innate tendency to visit the novel objects repeatedly than to the familiar objects. Two round plastic container boxes filled with sand were used as familiar objects, and a wooden cube box with different shape and color was used as novel object. The objects were positioned in the center of the open field, with equal distance separating them from one another and from the sides of the field. Number of visits to a novel object gives a behavioral measure of retention of memory and discriminating ability between familiar and novel objects, thus revealing their cognitive and hippocampal function. The test was done as a new one-trial NORT method. In the habituation phase, animals were allowed to orient and habituate in an open field for 30 min. Mice were retained in their home-cage for 5 min after the 30 min habituation phase. Subsequently, during the acquisition phase, mice were exposed to two identical objects and allowed to explore and get familiarized with the objects for 5 min. Subsequently, mice were placed back in their respective cages. During the test phase [one day after the acquisition phase], mice were again exposed to the open-field arena with one familiar object and a novel object, for 5 min. The test phase was video monitored, and the number of visits by each animal to the familiar and novel objects were marked manually from the monitor and then counted. Only the active contact of animal with its nose, mouth or paws to the objects was considered as the number of visits. The accidental touch, such as if animal was backing into the object or bumping the object accidentally as it passed was not included for scoring. To remove any olfactory clues, the test arena and the objects were cleaned with 70% alcohol before placing a successive mouse for the test. The presentation of the entire experimental protocol is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Diagrammatic representation of experimental protocol.


Figure 1.

Statistics

Data were presented as mean ±SEM and one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA] with Bonferroni's post-hoc test were used to compare the treatment effects between the groups, and a value of p< 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. SPSS (RRID: SCR_002865) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Aging mice supplemented with Ch-DHA, or administered with HEK-CM showed significantly increased mean % of correct choices ( p< 0.001) indicating enhanced spatial learning during both the 3 rd and 4 th day of training whereas those mice exposed to EE showed significantly enhanced spatial learning ( p<0.001) only on fourth day of training relative to same in age-matched SVC, HIHEK-CM, and NAC mice ( Figure 2, Table 1). During the initial days of training, mice from all groups made random re-entries into arms already visited. As the training continued, although aging mice exposed to Ch-DHA or HEK-CM or EE, showed progressive decrease in working memory errors, they were significantly lower ( p<0.01) only in Ch-DHA supplemented mice compared to the same in age-matched SVC ( Figure 3, Table 2). However, when compared with aging mice exposed to Ch-DHA, HEK-CM and EE group of mice, NAC mice and HIHEK-CM mice groups committed more working memory errors throughout training, indicating poor learning. Moreover, although the mean number of reference memory errors committed by Ch-DHA and HEK-CM mice were lesser during the 3 rd and 4 th day of training, no significant difference in reference memory errors was observed when compared to the same in age-matched NAC mice groups ( Figure 4, Table 3). However, Ch-DHA and HEK-CM mice attained a significantly higher percentage ( p<0.001 and p<0.05, respectively) of correct choices during the retention test. In contrast, NAC, HIHEK-CM mice showed significant impairment in the retention of spatial tasks ( Figure 5, Table 4).

Figure 2. Graphical representation of performance of mice groups as a function of trial days during learning phase in the eight-arm radial maze task.


Figure 2.

Values represent mean ±SEM percentage of correct choices along with Bonferroni post-hoc test p-values.

Human embryonic kidney stem cell conditioned media (HEK-CM) and choline-docosahexaenoic acid (Ch-DHA) mice vs heat inactivated HEK-CM (HIHEK-CM) or saline vehicle control (SVC) or normal ageing control (NAC) mice made significantly more correct choices on 3 rd and 4 th day of trials @@@ and ### p<0.001 respectively, whereas environmental enrichment (EE) exposed mice vs NAC mice made significantly more correct choices on 4 th day of trial. *** p<0.001.

Table 1. Spatial memory performance of mice groups during learning phase in the eight-arm radial maze task.

Groups (n=6 / group) Percentage of correct choices during learning phase Mean ± SEM
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4
NAC 30.23 ±3.08 33.78±3.98 29.71±2.48 25.05±1.97
SVC 30.83±1.78 34.75±2.58 34.03±1.67 28.80±2.01
HIHEK-CM 28.66±3.39 33.01±3.85 31.68±2.17 28.71±0.62
EE 31.36±4.26 35.50±3.72 37.81±3.92 43.45±2.32 ***
Ch-DHA 33.13±1.14 39.15±2.33 47.78±2.09 ### 52.83±2.89 ###
HEK-CM 36.23±3.29 31.60±2.78 49.06±2.74 @@@ 64.55±3.56 @@@

Figure 3. Graphical representation of performance of mice groups as a function of trial days during learning phase in the eight-arm radial maze task.


Figure 3.

Values represent mean ±SEM numbers of working memory errors, along with Bonferroni post-hoc test p-values.

Choline-docosahexaenoic acid (Ch-DHA) mice vs saline vehicle control (SVC) mice made significantly less numbers of working memory errors on 4 th day of trial. ## p<0.01 .

Table 2. Spatial working memory errors by mice groups during learning phase in the eight-arm radial maze task.

Groups (n=6 / group) Number of working memory errors Mean ± SEM
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4
NAC 2.83±0.47 2.33±1.02 2.33±0.84 2.16±0.47
SVC 2.66±0.38 2.58±0.32 3.16±0.38 3.25±0.21
HIHEK-CM 2.33±0.66 2.16±0.47 2.50±0.34 2.50±0.42
EE 3.00±0.89 2.00±0.73 1.16±0.47 1.00±0.36
Ch-DHA 2.41±0.41 2.08±0.30 1.08±0.32 1.08±0.27 ##
HEK-CM 2.16±0.60 2.16±0.54 1.00±0.36 1.16±0.30

Figure 4. Graphical representation of performance of mice groups as a function of trial days during learning phase in the eight-arm radial maze task: Values represent mean ±SEM numbers of reference memory errors along with Bonferroni post-hoc test p-values.


Figure 4.

Human embryonic kidney stem cell conditioned media (HEK-CM) and Choline-docosahexaenoic acid (Ch-DHA) mice made slightly fewer mean numbers of reference memory errors on 3 rd and 4 th day of trials when compared with all other groups.

Table 3. Spatial reference memory errors by mice groups during learning phase in the eight-arm radial maze task.

Groups (n=6 / group) Number of reference memory errors Mean ± SEM
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4
NAC 4.83±0.60 5.16±1.13 4.16±0.47 4.66±0.91
SVC 4.50±0.22 5.33±0.60 4.66±0.21 5.25±0.40
HIHEK-CM 4.33±0.33 4.83±1.32 4.83±0.47 5.66±0.42
EE 6.00±0.89 7.50±1.05 5.33±0.80 4.83±0.65
Ch-DHA 4.50±0.18 3.75±0.17 3.25±0.21 2.50±0.18
HEK-CM 5.66±0.33 6.33±1.05 3.66±0.76 3.33±0.80

Figure 5. Graphical representation of performance of mice groups during retention phase in the eight-arm radial maze task: Values represent mean ±SEM percentage of correct choices along with Bonferroni post-hoc test p-values.


Figure 5.

Choline-docosahexaenoic acid (Ch-DHA) and human embryonic kidney stem cell conditioned media (HEK-CM) mice vs saline vehicle control (SVC) or normal ageing control (NAC) and heat inactivated HEK-CM (HIHEK-CM) mice respectively made significantly more percentage of correct choices during retention phase. ### p< 0.001 and @ p< 0.05.

Table 4. Correct choices made by mice groups during spatial memory retention phase in the eight-arm radial maze task.

Groups (n=6 / group) Percentage of correct choices during retention phase Mean ± SEM
NAC 28.68±2.42
SVC 26.21±2.37
HIHEK-CM 27.61±1.59
EE 39.88±5.10
Ch-DHA 50.28±3.22 ###
HEK-CM 53.68±5.34 @

When aging mice supplemented with Ch-DHA, or exposed to HEK-CM or EE were assessed for cognition in NORT, significant differences in visits to the familiar object, were observed in HEK-CM and EE groups when compared to NAC and HIHEK-CM groups ( p<0.05). Moreover, aging mice supplemented with Ch-DHA also showed slightly higher number of visits to familiar object compared to NAC mice but it was not significant ( Figure 6, Table 5). When the number of visits to novel objects was compared between all groups, HEKCM aging mice showed significantly higher preference ( p<0.001) with higher number of visits to the novel object as compared to the same in age-matched NAC and HI-HEKCM mice groups. Whereas, Ch-DHA supplemented aging mice showed higher preference at lower significant levels ( p< 0.05) to the novel object as compared to the same in age-matched NAC mice group ( Figure 7, Table 6).

Figure 6. Graphical representation of tendency of mice groups to visit familiar object in NORT: Values represent mean ±SEM number of visits to the familiar object along with Bonferroni post-hoc test p-values.


Figure 6.

Environmental enrichment (EE) and human embryonic kidney stem cell conditioned media (HEK-CM) mice vs normal ageing control (NAC) and heat inactivated HEK-CM (HIHEK-CM) mice respectively made significantly greater number of visits to familiar object * and @ p<0.05.

Table 5. Cognitive performance of mice groups showing visits to familiar object in the NORT.

Groups (n=6 /group) Number of visits to familiar object Mean ± SEM
NAC 5.83±0.70
HIHEK-CM 5.33±0.84
EE 11.50±1.96 *
Ch-DHA 9.00±1.03
HEK-CM 10.66±0.76

Figure 7. Graphical representation of tendency of mice groups to visit novel object in NORT: Values represent mean ±SEM number of visits to the novel object along with Bonferroni post-hoc test p-values.


Figure 7.

Human embryonic kidney stem cell conditioned media (HEK-CM) and choline-docosahexaenoic acid (Ch-DHA) mice vs heat inactivated HEK-CM (HIHEK-CM) or normal ageing control (NAC) mice respectively made significantly greater number of visits to novel object. @@@ p<0.001 and # p<0.05

Table 6. Cognitive performance of mice groups showing visits to novel object in the NORT.

Groups (n=6 / group) Number of visits to novel object Mean ± SEM
NAC 9.16±0.74
HIHEK-CM 7.00±1.09
EE 13.33±0.95
Ch-DHA 14.50±1.60 #
HEK-CM 16.66±0.84 @@@

Discussion

Spatial learning and memory

The present study results reveal that normal aging in mice is associated with cognitive and memory impairments, particularly in spatial learning. Aged mice supplemented with Ch-DHA demonstrated improved spatial learning, reduced memory errors, and better performance in choosing baited arms during the radial arm maze task. HEK-CM treatment also yielded positive outcomes, surpassing Ch-DHA supplementation on the 4 th trial day. EE exposure demonstrated benefits, particularly on the 4 th trial day, outperforming NAC-treated mice. Overall, Ch-DHA, HEK-CM, and EE interventions exhibited potential in mitigating spatial memory deficits in aging mice. High consumption of Ch during the perinatal period showed neuroprotective effect in animal models including during age related neuronal dysfunction. Perinatal Ch supplemented rats showed improvement in spatial memory performance and showed less errors relative to the untreated group when subjected to a 12-arm radial maze task. 31 , 32 Rats which were supplemented with Ch as infants were able to retain a larger number of items in working memory during their adulthood. 33 Studies also report that, dietary DHA supplementation enhances spatial memory in DHA deficient rats. 34 Recent studies observed that, combined supplementation of both Ch and DHA was more efficacious in enhancing hippocampal neurodevelopment. Prenatal supplementation of Ch and DHA showed significant improvement in spatial learning and other cognitive functions during adolescence. 35 , 36 Supplementation of Ch and DHA reduced memory errors in obese rats when subjected to eight arm radial maze test. 37 The hippocampus plays a major role in memory function. Hippocampal damage disturbs the memory consolidation. 38 Cell therapies are beneficial in restoring spatial learning in animal models of hippocampal degeneration. 39 , 40 Conditioned media which are derived from cell cultures are known to have excellent sources of neurotrophic factors and cytokines. 41 , 42 Furthermore, HEK-CM contain a neurotropic factor erythropoietin and other cytokines. 43 , 44 In kainic acid induced hippocampal damaged mice, HEK-CM treatment showed significant increase in neuro-protection and improvement of hippocampal cognitive function. 45 Previous studies have demonstrated neuroprotective potential of HEK-CM in animal models and in vitro neurodegenerative conditions attributing to endogenous upregulations of erythropoietin, BDNF and anti-apoptotic factors.; 46 , 53 Further, previous studies in aged animals also showed that EE prevents age-associated impairments in spatial learning and memory. 26 , 47

Cognition

The NORT was used to assess recognition memory in aging mice following the different interventions. The present findings suggest that Ch-DHA supplementation, HEK-CM treatment, and EE may differentially influence recognition memory during aging. In particular, HEK-CM and Ch-DHA treatments were associated with greater exploration of novel objects, suggesting improved recognition memory, whereas EE produced a different pattern of object preference with greater exploration of familiar object. These observations indicate that nutritional, cell-derived, and environmental interventions may influence memory-related behaviors through distinct mechanisms.

The present findings are generally consistent with previous reports demonstrating beneficial effects of HEK-CM and Ch-DHA on recognition memory. Kainic acid-lesioned mice treated with HEK-CM exhibited a significantly greater preference for novel objects than untreated animals, and normal mice receiving HEK-CM also showed enhanced exploration of novel objects. 46 Similarly, combined choline and DHA supplementation following perinatal brain injury improved performance in the novel object recognition test, indicating enhanced recognition memory. 48 AThese observations support the increased novel object preference observed in the HEK-CM and Ch-DHA treated groups in the present study. EE has also been reported to influence object recognition behavior, although the nature of this effect may vary with age. A previous study showed that animals exposed to EE displayed age-dependent object preferences. It was observed that young mice spent more time exploring novel objects, whereas aged mice showed a greater preference for familiar objects. 49 Such age-related variability may explain the distinct pattern of object preference observed in the EE group in the present study.

Previous studies have detailed a few of the molecular mechanisms underlying the relationship between these strategies and their role in learning, memory, and cognition. Choline is known for its ability to enhance cholinergic function, while DHA, as an essential nutrient, facilitates neuronal development and processes such as neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, and synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus, ultimately enhancing cognitive capabilities. 48 Additionally, the HEK-CM is an excellent source of neurotrophic factors and contains known neuroprotectants such as erythropoietin and other cytokines that enhance cognition. 44 46 Exposure to EE has been found to stimulate neurogenesis, enhance the granule cell layer, and increase the number of dentate gyrus granule cells in the hippocampus. Moreover, EE exposure elevates the cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) level in the hippocampus of aged animals. 27 , 47 Hence, it is evident that these strategies employ various underlying mechanisms to regulate both the structure and function of the hippocampus and related areas involved in cognitive processing. This variability could potentially account for the differences in behavioral outcomes observed in the present study in mice following exposure to these distinct age-associated cognitive-enhancing strategies. The current study might not capture the long-term effects of the interventions and sustained cognitive improvements. In addition, the present study has several limitations, including the absence of molecular and histological analyses to elucidate underlying mechanisms, the inclusion of only male mice which may limit the generalizability of the findings to females. Future studies incorporating both sexes, mechanistic assessments, characterization of conditioned media, longer follow-up periods, and adequately powered experimental designs are warranted.

Conclusion

During normal aging in mice, supplementations of Ch-DHA and HEK-CM treatment strategies have a higher potential [~ 20—30%] for enhancing spatial learning, and recognition memory, whereas exposure to EE seems to enhance only short-term memory. Further studies need to be done in order to analyse the underlying mechanisms for the cognitive changes.

Author contributions

Kiranmai S Rai and Anandh Dhanushkodi conceptualized and designed the methodology for this study. They have worked as project administrators and mentors/supervisors. The study was carried out in detail and investigated by Shreevatsa Bhat M. Data collection, curation and formal analysis of the data were carried out by Shreevatsa Bhat M. Resources were provided by Manipal Academy of Higher Education and partly by Anandh Dhanushkodi and Kiranmai S Rai. Shreevatsa Bhat M and Kiranmai S Rai have analysed and validated data. Shreevatsa Bhat M has written original draft. It has been critically revised and suggestions for editing were given by Kiranmai S Rai, Anandh Dhanushkodi and Ramesh Babu MG. Shreevatsa Bhat M, Ramesh Babu MG, Anandh Dhanushkodi and Kiranmai S Rai read the final version of article and have approved this version to be published.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Manipal Academy of Higher Education for providing all infrastructure and support needed for this study.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 4; peer review: 1 approved

Data availability

Underlying data

Dryad: Data for Radial arm maze tests and Novel object recognition test, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.xpnvx0kj3. 50

This project contains the following underlying data:

File 1. Percentage_of_correct_choices-Learning_phase.csv (Percentage of correct choices made by mice during learning phase of eight arm radial maze test)

File 2. Working_memory_error.csv (Number of working memory errors made by mice during trial phase of eight arm radial maze test)

File 3. Reference_memory_error.csv (Number of reference memory errors made by mice during trial phase of eight arm radial maze test)

File 4. Percentage_of_correct_choices-Retention_phase (Percentage of correct choices made by mice during retention phase of eight arm radial maze test)

File 5. Visits_to_familiar_object.csv (Number of visits to familiar object made by mice during the test phase of novel object recognition test)

File 6. Visits_to_novel_object.csv (Number of visits to novel object made by mice during the test phase of novel object recognition test)

Reporting guidelines

Dryad: ARRIVE checklist for ‘Exploring potential strategies to enhance memory and cognition in aging mice ’. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.xpnvx0kj3. 50

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

References

  • 1. Hedden T, Gabrieli JDE: Insights into the ageing mind: A view from cognitive neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004;5:87–96. 10.1038/nrn1323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Park DC, Reuter-Lorenz P: The adaptive brain: Aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2009;60:173–196. 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Foster TC: Involvement of hippocampal synaptic plasticity in age-related memory decline. Brain Res. Rev. 1999;30:236–249. 10.1016/S0165-0173(99)00017-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Albert M, Duffy FH, Naeser M: Nonlinear changes in cognition with age and their neuropsychologic correlates. Can. J. Psychol. 1987;41:141–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Craik FIM, Moscovitch M, McDowd JM: Contributions of Surface and Conceptual Information to Performance on Implicit and Explicit Memory Tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1994;20:864–875. 10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Montgomery EB, et al. : Early detection of probable idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: I. Development of a diagnostic test battery. Mov. Disord. 2000;15:511–515. 10.1002/1531-8257(200005)15:3<474::AID-MDS1008>3.0.CO;2-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Zeisel SH, Blusztajn JK: Choline and human nutrition. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1994;14:269–296. 10.1146/annurev.nu.14.070194.001413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Fisher MC, Zeisel SH, Mar MH, et al. : Perturbations in choline metabolism cause neural tube defects in mouse embryos in vitro. The FASEB journal: official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2002;16:619–621. 10.1096/fj.01-0564fje [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Meck WH, Williams CL: Perinatal choline supplementation increases the threshold for chunking in spatial memory. NeuroReport. 1997;8:3053–3059. 10.1097/00001756-199709290-00010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Meck WH, Williams CL: Characterization of the facilitative effects of perinatal choline supplementation on timing and temporal memory. NeuroReport. 1997;8:2831–2835. 10.1097/00001756-199709080-00005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ryan SH, Williams JK, Thomas JD: Choline supplementation attenuates learning deficits associated with neonatal alcohol exposure in the rat: Effects of varying the timing of choline administration. Brain Res. 2008;1237:91–100. 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.08.048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Wurtman RJ, et al. : Synaptic proteins and phospholipids are increased in gerbil brain by administering uridine plus docosahexaenoic acid orally. Brain Res. 2006;1088:83–92. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Wurtman RJ: Synapse formation and cognitive brain development: effect of docosahexaenoic acid and other dietary constituents. Metab. Clin. Exp. 2008;57:S6–S10. 10.1016/j.metabol.2008.07.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Stonehouse W, et al. : DHA supplementation improved both memory and reaction time in healthy young adults: A randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013;97:1134–1143. 10.3945/ajcn.112.053371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wu A, Ying Z, Gomez-Pinilla F: The salutary effects of DHA dietary supplementation on cognition, neuroplasticity, and membrane homeostasis after brain trauma. J. Neurotrauma. 2011;28:2113–2122. 10.1089/neu.2011.1872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Holguin S, Martinez J, Chow C, et al. : Dietary uridine enhances the improvement in learning and memory produced by administering DHA to gerbils. FASEB J. 2008;22:3938–3946. 10.1096/fj.08-112425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, et al. : The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013;153:1194–1217. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Rao M, Khanna A, Shin S, et al. : Stem Cells for the Treatment of Neurological Disorders. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets. 2008;7:98–109. 10.2174/187152708783885183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Curtis MA, Eriksson PS, Faull RLM: Progenitor cells and adult neurogenesis in neurodegenerative diseases and injuries of the basal ganglia. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2007;34:528–532. 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2007.04609.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Zhao C, Deng W, Gage FH: Mechanisms and Functional Implications of Adult Neurogenesis. Cell. 2008;132:645–660. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kondziolka D, Wechsler L: Stroke repair with cell transplantation: Neuronal cells, neuroprogenitor cells, and stem cells. Neurosurg. Focus. 2008;24:E13. 10.3171/FOC/2008/24/3-4/E12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Lindvall O, Kokaia Z: Stem cells for the treatment of neurological disorders. Nature. 2006;441:1094–1096. 10.1038/nature04960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Lee AS, Tang C, Rao MS, et al. : Tumorigenicity as a clinical hurdle for pluripotent stem cell therapies. Nat. Med. 2013;19:998–1004. 10.1038/nm.3267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Conboy IM, Yousef H, Conboy MJ: Embryonic anti-aging niche. Aging. 2011;3:555–563. 10.18632/aging.100333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Woo DH, et al. : Direct and indirect contribution of human embryonic stem cellderived hepatocyte-like cells to liver repair in mice. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:602–611. 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.11.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Fernández-Teruel A, Escorihuela RM, Castellano B, et al. : Neonatal handling and environmental enrichment effects on emotionality, novelty/reward seeking, and age-related cognitive and hippocampal impairments: Focus on the roman rat lines. Behav. Genet. 1997;27:513–526. 10.1023/A:1021400830503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Kempermann G, Gast D, Gage FH: Neuroplasticity in old age: Sustained fivefold induction of hippocampal neurogenesis by long-term environmental enrichment. Ann. Neurol. 2002;52:135–143. 10.1002/ana.10262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Leal-Galicia P, Castañeda-Bueno M, Quiroz-Baez R, et al. : Long-term exposure to environmental enrichment since youth prevents recognition memory decline and increases synaptic plasticity markers in aging. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2008;90:511–518. 10.1016/j.nlm.2008.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Arendash GW, et al. : Environmental enrichment improves cognition in aged Alzheimer’s transgenic mice despite stable β-amyloid deposition. Neuroreport. 2004;15:1751–1754. 10.1097/01.wnr.0000137183.68847.4e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Waterston RH, Lindblad-Toh K, Birney E, et al. : Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature. 2002;420(6915). 10.1038/nature01262 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Meck WH, Williams CL: Metabolic imprinting of choline by its availability during gestation: Implications for memory and attentional processing across the lifespan. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2003;27:385–399. 10.1016/S0149-7634(03)00069-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Meck WH, Williams CL, Cermak JM, et al. : Developmental periods of choline sensitivity provide an ontogenetic mechanism for regulating memory capacity and age-related dementia. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2008;1. 10.3389/neuro.07.007.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Rakitin BC, Dallal NL, Meck WH: Spatial memory structure and capacity: Influences on problem-solving and memory-coding strategies. Cognitive Aspects of Stimulus Control. 2018; 10.4324/9781315789101-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Hashimoto M, et al. : Chronic administration of docosahexaenoic acid ameliorates the impairment of spatial cognition learning ability in amyloid β-infused rats. J. Nutr. 2005;135:549–555. 10.1093/jn/135.3.549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Thomas RH, et al. : Neurocognitive developmental outcomes in early adolescent rats prenatally exposed to choline and docosahexaenoic acid. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2018;12. 10.7860/JCDR/2018/29563.11038 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Thomas Rajarethnem H, et al. : Combined Supplementation of Choline and Docosahexaenoic Acid during Pregnancy Enhances Neurodevelopment of Fetal Hippocampus. Neurol. Res. Int. 2017;2017:1–9. 10.1155/2017/8748706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Prabhu GS, Rao MKG, Rai KS: Hippocampal neural cell degeneration and memory deficit in high-fat diet-induced postnatal obese rats- exploring the comparable benefits of choline and DHA or environmental enrichment. Int. J. Neurosci. 2021;131:1066–1077. 10.1080/00207454.2020.1773819 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Dhanushkodi A, Bindu B, Raju TR, et al. : Exposure to Enriched Environment Improves Spatial Learning Performances and Enhances Cell Density but Not Choline Acetyltransferase Activity in the Hippocampus of Ventral Subicular-Lesioned Rats. Behav. Neurosci. 2007;121:491–500. 10.1037/0735-7044.121.3.491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Rekha J, et al. : Transplantation of hippocampal cell lines restore spatial learning in rats with ventral subicular lesions. Behav. Neurosci. 2009;123:1197–1217. 10.1037/a0017655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Rekha J, et al. : NIH-3T3 fibroblast transplants enhance host regeneration and improve spatial learning in ventral subicular lesioned rats. Behav. Brain Res. 2011;218:315–324. 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.11.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Withy RM, et al. : Growth factors produced by human embryonic kidney cells that influence megakaryopoiesis include erythropoietin, interleukin 6, and transforming growth factor-beta. J. Cell. Physiol. 1992;153:362–372. 10.1002/jcp.1041530216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. McDonald TP, Jackson CW: Thrombopoietin derived from human embryonic kidney cells stimulates an increase in DNA content of murine megakaryocytes in vivo. Exp. Hematol. 1990;18:758–763. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Sze SK, et al. : Elucidating the secretion proteome of human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics. 2007;6:1680–1689. 10.1074/mcp.M600393-MCP200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Chong ZZ, Kang JQ, Maiese K: Hematopoietic factor erythropoietin fosters neuroprotection through novel signal transduction cascades. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2002;22:503–514. 10.1097/00004647-200205000-00001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Dhanushkodi A, et al. : A single intramuscular injection of rAAV-mediated mutant erythropoietin protects against MPTP-induced parkinsonism. Genes Brain Behav. 2013;12:224–233. 10.1111/gbb.12001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Dhanushkodi A, et al. : Infusion of human embryonic kidney cell line conditioned medium reverses kainic acid induced hippocampal damage in mice. Cytotherapy. 2014;16:1760–1770. 10.1016/j.jcyt.2014.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Huang FL, Huang KP, Boucheron C: Long-term enrichment enhances the cognitive behavior of the aging neurogranin null mice without affecting their hippocampal LTP. Learn. Mem. 2007;14:512–519. 10.1101/lm.636107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Brandt MJV, et al. : Nutritional Supplementation Reduces Lesion Size and Neuroinflammation in a Sex-Dependent Manner in a Mouse Model of Perinatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury. Nutrients. 2021;14. 10.3390/nu14010176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Diniz DG, et al. : Age, environment, object recognition and morphological diversity of GFAP-immunolabeled astrocytes. Behav. Brain Funct. 2016;12:28. 10.1186/s12993-016-0111-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Bhat Shreevatsa M, Rai KS, Ramesh Babu MG, Dhanushkodi A: Data for Radial arm maze tests and Novel object recognition test. Dryad Dataset. 2022. 10.5061/dryad.xpnvx0kj3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Mun JG, Legette LL, Ikonte CJ, et al. : Choline and DHA in maternal and infant nutrition: Synergistic implications in brain and eye health. Nutrients 2019;11:1125. 10.3390/nu11051125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Resseguie M, et al. : Phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEMT) gene expression is induced by estrogen in human and mouse primary hepatocytes. FASEB J. 2007;21:2622–2632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Resseguie M, et al. : Phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEMT) gene expression is induced by estrogen in human and mouse primary hepatocytes. FASEB J. 2007;21:2622–2632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2026 Jul 2. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.204117.r497907

Reviewer response for version 4

David V C Brito 1,2,3

Bhat et al. investigate the effects of three potential memory-enhancing interventions on behavioural measures of memory in middle-aged/aging male CF1 mice. Spatial learning and memory were assessed using the eight-arm radial maze, while recognition memory was assessed using the novel object recognition test. The authors report that Ch-DHA and HEK-CM improved performance in selected radial maze readouts and increased novel object visits in the NORT, whereas environmental enrichment showed more limited effects.

The topic is relevant and the comparison of nutritional, cell-derived and environmental interventions in the same experimental framework has academic merit. The manuscript has improved compared with previous versions, particularly with the inclusion of additional methodological details, a clearer experimental scheme and a more explicit limitations section. The availability of the underlying behavioural data is also a strength.

However, I still have several reservations regarding the strength of the conclusions. The main issues relate to the terminology and characterization of HEK-CM, the statistical analysis of repeated behavioural measures, the interpretation of the NORT data, the apparent mismatch in one of the figures, and the need to frame the findings more cautiously as exploratory.

Major comments

1. The manuscript repeatedly refers to “human embryonic kidney stem cell conditioned media”. However, the Methods section indicates that the conditioned medium was derived from cryopreserved 293T cells. HEK293T cells are an immortalized/transformed human embryonic kidney-derived cell line, not stem cells. Unless the authors can justify this terminology, I recommend replacing “human embryonic kidney stem cell conditioned media” with “HEK293T-conditioned medium” or “HEK cell-conditioned medium” throughout the whole manuscript.

Moreover, the conditioned medium is insufficiently characterized in my opinion. For example, information on passage number, duration of conditioning, whether the medium was serum-containing at collection and whether protein concentration or any secreted factors were quantified are lacking. This might be important for the discussion of neurotrophic factors, erythropoietin, cytokines or other bioactive components are present.

2. The acquisition phase of the radial maze contains repeated measurements across days in the same animals. Therefore, analysing each day separately using one-way ANOVA does not fully capture the learning trajectory of each animal. A repeated-measures two-way ANOVA or mixed-effects model would be more appropriate for the acquisition data. This would allow the authors to determine whether the interventions truly altered learning over time rather than only producing group differences on individual days.

3. The current NORT analysis is based on the number of visits to the familiar and novel objects, analysed separately. This is a relatively indirect measure of recognition memory and may be influenced by general exploratory activity, locomotor behaviour, anxiety-like behaviour, or object-natural preference.

Since the test was video monitored, I strongly recommend that the authors re-quantify the NORT data using exploration time. A more informative and standard readout would be the proportion of time spent exploring the novel object relative to total object exploration time, for example:

Novel object preference = [time exploring novel object / (time exploring novel object + time exploring familiar object) ] x 100

Alternatively, the authors could calculate a discrimination index:

Discrimination index = (novel object exploration time − familiar object exploration time) / total object exploration time

This would provide a more sensitive and interpretable measure of recognition memory. At minimum, the authors should report total object exploration time or total visits per group and discuss the limitations of using visit counts alone. This is particularly important because an increase in visits to the novel object may reflect increased overall exploration rather than improved recognition memory.

4. The manuscript states that HEK-CM and EE groups showed significantly greater visits to the familiar object. This does not straightforwardly indicate improved recognition memory. In standard NORT interpretation, preferential exploration of the novel object is usually taken as evidence of recognition of the familiar object. Increased familiar-object visits, especially in the absence of a discrimination index or total exploration analysis, may reflect altered exploration patterns rather than enhanced memory. The authors should revise this interpretation and avoid concluding that increased familiar object visits necessarily indicate improved cognition or short-term memory.

5. The figure labelled as showing visits to the familiar object in the NORT appears to display values and a y-axis corresponding to percentage of correct choices, rather than number of familiar-object visits. This does not match Table 5, where familiar-object visits are reported as approximately 5–12 visits. The authors should carefully check and correct Figure 6.

6. The data support cautious statements that Ch-DHA and HEK-CM were associated with improved performance in selected behavioural tasks. However, the current conclusion that these treatments have a higher potential for enhancing spatial learning and recognition memory by approximately 20–30% is too strong unless supported by direct statistical comparisons between intervention groups. The study does not establish therapeutic superiority or mechanism.

Minor comments

  1. The environmental enrichment protocol should include additional details, including the number of animals per enriched cage, whether this differed from control housing, and whether object rotation followed a predefined schedule.

  2. The authors should avoid mechanistic overstatements. References to BDNF, erythropoietin, neurogenesis, CREB, synaptic plasticity and anti-apoptotic pathways should be clearly presented as plausible mechanisms based on previous literature, not as mechanisms demonstrated in the present study.

  3. The manuscript would benefit from further language editing. Some expressions remain imprecise for example: “lesser”, “spacial”, “mice species”, “normal aging mice”, and broad use of “cognition”.

  4. The authors should consider adding individual data points to the graphs, especially given the small sample size.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

aging, cognition, behavioral neuroscience, and preclinical mouse models.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2024 Jul 5. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.159866.r293756

Reviewer response for version 3

Laibaik Park 1

Normal aging often leads to declines in various physiological functions, including cognitive abilities. Nutritional interventions have been reported to effectively prevent or delay age-related neuronal deficits, such as cognitive and behavioral declines. Nutrients like choline (Ch) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), along with therapies such as stem cell treatments and environmental enrichment (EE), have been shown to enhance brain function in humans and animals. However, there are no comparative studies on the neuroprotective effects of Ch, DHA, stem cells, and EE on age-related cognitive and memory declines. To address this gap, the authors treated male CF-1 mice (12-15 months old) with Ch-DHA, human embryonic kidney stem cell conditioned media (HEK-CM) and its control, and EE. Starting 30 days later, they conducted cognitive testing using an eight-arm radial arm maze and novel object recognition tests over 14 days. The authors report that Ch-DHA supplementation or HEK-CM treatment improved spatial learning, memory, and cognition, while EE was effective only in enhancing short-term memory. While the findings are intriguing, the manuscript is overly descriptive, unclear, and difficult to follow. Below are my suggestions to improve its quality.

Majors,

  1. The introduction clearly indicates that each of the treatments, such as Ch, DHA, HEK-CM, and EE, independently enhance brain function through unique mechanisms over varying treatment durations. For instance, maternal uptake of Ch during gestation increases nerve cell proliferation, DHA might improve cognitive function by increasing the level of synaptic proteins and membrane phospholipids in the hippocampal neurons, while cell and cell-derived therapies could enhance neural regeneration by chemical factors. EE might stimulate neuroplasticity through enriched environmental exposure. Based on these, it is uncertain whether it is feasible and informative to test and compare the effects of these treatments 30 days after their administration. The authors did not provide supporting data on each treatment. Authors should provide additional supporting data by conducting further experiments, such as Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, etc..

  2. Although the authors claim that Ch-DHA supplementation or HEK-CM treatment improved spatial learning, memory, and cognition, with EE being effective only in enhancing short-term memory, the behavioral tests used (eight-arm radial arm maze and novel object recognition) are insufficient to support this claim. This is because the eight-arm radial arm maze is designed to assess working and reference memory, while the novel object recognition test evaluates recognition memory.

  3. Only male mice were used in the study: why? Is it because the rearing environment affects radial-arm maze performance in male species, while its effect on females is inconsistent? Clear rationale and discussion are required.

  4. Why was the treatment of Ch combined with DHA? Both treatments are known for their neuroprotective effects. Was it because pellet itself contained Ch content (1 mg/kg), as indicated on “Pellet feed …., Pune]” (page 4, lines 6-7)?  

  5. In the animal section, the third line on page 10 indicates that 66 middle-aged (12 to 15-month-old) CF1 male mice were housed in the animal facility, but the first line of Experimental groups indicates that n=6/group was used: there is a discrepancy considering there were six treatment groups. In addition, was the power analysis performed to calculate the number of mice used for each group?

  6. Were any proteins or neuroprotectants identified in the HEK-CM? Are there references supporting the experiments conducted with HEK-CM? If not, did the authors analyze the CM and assess its protein content?  

  7. Including the experimental protocol as a figure could enhance the understanding of the study.

  8. The first paragraph of “Cognition” section in Discussion on page 10 should be rewritten to be understandable on the basis of the rationale of the manuscript.

  9. The second paragraph of the "Cognition" section in the Discussion on page 10 needs to be revised to better align with the findings presented in the manuscript.

Minors,

  1. Page 3, line 23 (Cellular senescence … organism) seems non-sense.

  2. On page 4, line 8, ad libitum and freely are redundant.

  3. To remove olfactory cues, different ethanol concentrations of alcohol were used: 50% in eight-arm radial arm and 70% in novel object recognition. Is there any reason?

  4. The y-axis of Figure 1 should be labeled with the full scale (e.g., 0-100) rather than a shortened range (e.g., 20-70), which exaggerates the treatment effects.

  5. English proof-reading is recommended.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Partly

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

No

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

No

Reviewer Expertise:

Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, blood flow regulation

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.

F1000Res. 2026 Jun 16.
Prof Kiranmai S Rai 1

Response to Reviewer 3

We sincerely thank the reviewer for the careful review of our manuscript and for the constructive comments and suggestions. We have revised the manuscript accordingly, and our point-by-point responses are provided below.

Major suggestions

  1. The introduction clearly indicates that each of the treatments, such as Ch, DHA, HEK-CM, and EE, independently enhance brain function through unique mechanisms over varying treatment durations. For instance, maternal uptake of Ch during gestation increases nerve cell proliferation, DHA might improve cognitive function by increasing the level of synaptic proteins and membrane phospholipids in the hippocampal neurons, while cell and cell-derived therapies could enhance neural regeneration by chemical factors. EE might stimulate neuroplasticity through enriched environmental exposure. Based on these, it is uncertain whether it is feasible and informative to test and compare the effects of these treatments 30 days after their administration. The authors did not provide supporting data on each treatment. Authors should provide additional supporting data by conducting further experiments, such as Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, etc..

Response: We thank the reviewer for this important observation. The purpose of the present study was to perform an initial behavioral comparison of different neuroprotective strategies in middle-aged mice under identical testing conditions. We agree that choline, DHA, HEK-conditioned media, and environmental enrichment likely act through distinct cellular pathways and time courses. The 30-day post-treatment assessment was intentionally selected to determine whether the benefits of these interventions persist beyond the immediate treatment period and to provide a common endpoint for comparison across all treatment groups. This approach allowed us to evaluate the durability of functional outcomes despite differences in the underlying mechanisms of action. Because this study was designed as a preliminary behavioral screening, molecular analyses such as Western blotting or immunohistochemistry were not included. We have now explicitly acknowledged this limitation in the revised discussion section and highlighted mechanistic studies as an important direction for future research.

 

  1. Although the authors claim that Ch-DHA supplementation or HEK-CM treatment improved spatial learning, memory, and cognition, with EE being effective only in enhancing short-term memory, the behavioral tests used (eight-arm radial arm maze and novel object recognition) are insufficient to support this claim. This is because the eight-arm radial arm maze is designed to assess working and reference memory, while the novel object recognition test evaluates recognition memory.

Response: We agree with the reviewer that the behavioral tests used assess specific memory domains rather than global cognition. We have revised the manuscript to state that the interventions improved performance in tasks related to working, reference, and recognition memory, rather than making broad claims about overall cognition.

 

  1. Only male mice were used in the study: why? Is it because the rearing environment affects radial-arm maze performance in male species, while its effect on females is inconsistent? Clear rationale and discussion are required.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this important comment. Male mice were selected for this study to minimize biological variability and to maximize the ability to detect the effects of choline-containing supplementation. Sex differences in choline metabolism have been reported, with females exhibiting enhanced endogenous choline synthesis due to estrogen-mediated activation of the phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase pathway. [DOI: 10.1096/fj.07-8227com] This mechanism can increase endogenous choline availability and may partially compensate for dietary choline requirements. In contrast, male mice rely more heavily on dietary sources of choline, making them generally more responsive to changes in choline intake. Therefore, the use of male mice provided a more sensitive experimental model for evaluating the effects of Ch-DHA supplementation on memory-related outcomes. We have added this rationale to the Methods section with supporting references and included the lack of female subjects as a limitation of the study in the revised Discussion section.

 

  1. Why was the treatment of Ch combined with DHA? Both treatments are known for their neuroprotective effects. Was it because pellet itself contained Ch content (1 mg/kg), as indicated on “Pellet feed …., Pune]” (page 4, lines 6-7)?

Response: Choline and DHA were administered in combination based on prior evidence suggesting complementary and potentially synergistic roles in phosphatidylcholine synthesis, neuronal membrane formation, synaptic plasticity, and cognitive function. [DOI: 10.3390/nu11051125] We have clarified this rationale in the Introduction and added the relevant reference.

 

  1. In the animal section, the third line on page 10 indicates that 66 middle-aged (12 to 15-month-old) CF1 male mice were housed in the animal facility, but the first line of Experimental groups indicates that n=6/group was used: there is a discrepancy considering there were six treatment groups. In addition, was the power analysis performed to calculate the number of mice used for each group?

Response: The number “66” reported in the Animals section was a typographical error. We apologise for the error. The correct total number of animals used in the study was 36, with n=6 per group across six experimental groups. This has now been corrected in the revised manuscript. Power analysis was not performed because this study was exploratory in nature. We have now acknowledged this as a limitation.

 

  1. Were any proteins or neuroprotectants identified in the HEK-CM? Are there references supporting the experiments conducted with HEK-CM? If not, did the authors analyze the CM and assess its protein content?

Response: The conditioned media was used based on prior studies demonstrating neurotrophic effects. Previous studies have demonstrated neuroprotective potential of HEK-CM in animal models and in vitro neurodegenerative conditions attributing to endogenous upregulations of erythropoietin, BDNF and anti-apoptotic factors. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2014.07.001 & DOI: 10.1155/2014/194967] We have added references supporting the biological relevance of HEK-conditioned media and clarified this in the discussion.

 

  1. Including the experimental protocol as a figure could enhance the understanding of the study.

Response: We thank the reviewer for the suggestion. We have included a schematic diagram of the experimental protocol in the revised manuscript.

 

  1. The first paragraph of “Cognition” section in Discussion on page 10 should be rewritten to be understandable on the basis of the rationale of the manuscript.

  2. The second paragraph of the "Cognition" section in the Discussion on page 10 needs to be revised to better align with the findings presented in the manuscript.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this valuable suggestion. The first and second paragraphs of the Cognition section have been revised to improve clarity and better align the discussion with the study rationale and findings.

Minor suggestions

 

  1. Page 3, line 23 (Cellular senescence … organism) seems non-sense.

Response: The sentence has been revised for clarity and scientific accuracy in the revised manuscript.

 

  1. On page 4, line 8, ad libitum and freely are redundant.

Response: The sentence has been corrected in the revised manuscript.

 

  1. To remove olfactory cues, different ethanol concentrations of alcohol were used: 50% in eight-arm radial arm and 70% in novel object recognition. Is there any reason?

Response: In both the eight-arm radial maze and novel object recognition test, 70% ethanol was used to remove olfactory cues between trials. The manuscript has been corrected accordingly.

 

  1. The y-axis of Figure 1 should be labeled with the full scale (e.g., 0-100) rather than a shortened range (e.g., 20-70), which exaggerates the treatment effects.

Response: The y-axis of figure has been revised to display the full scale as suggested by the reviewer.

 

  1. English proof-reading is recommended.

Response: The manuscript has been carefully proofread, and necessary grammatical, language, and typographical corrections have been made wherever applicable.

F1000Res. 2026 Jun 16.
Prof Kiranmai S Rai 1

Response to Reviewer 3

We sincerely thank the reviewer for the careful review of our manuscript and for the constructive comments and suggestions. We have revised the manuscript accordingly, and our point-by-point responses are provided below.

Major suggestions

1. The introduction clearly indicates that each of the treatments, such as Ch, DHA, HEK-CM, and EE, independently enhance brain function through unique mechanisms over varying treatment durations. For instance, maternal uptake of Ch during gestation increases nerve cell proliferation, DHA might improve cognitive function by increasing the level of synaptic proteins and membrane phospholipids in the hippocampal neurons, while cell and cell-derived therapies could enhance neural regeneration by chemical factors. EE might stimulate neuroplasticity through enriched environmental exposure. Based on these, it is uncertain whether it is feasible and informative to test and compare the effects of these treatments 30 days after their administration. The authors did not provide supporting data on each treatment. Authors should provide additional supporting data by conducting further experiments, such as Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, etc..

Response: We thank the reviewer for this important observation. The purpose of the present study was to perform an initial behavioral comparison of different neuroprotective strategies in middle-aged mice under identical testing conditions. We agree that choline, DHA, HEK-conditioned media, and environmental enrichment likely act through distinct cellular pathways and time courses. The 30-day post-treatment assessment was intentionally selected to determine whether the benefits of these interventions persist beyond the immediate treatment period and to provide a common endpoint for comparison across all treatment groups. This approach allowed us to evaluate the durability of functional outcomes despite differences in the underlying mechanisms of action. Because this study was designed as a preliminary behavioral screening, molecular analyses such as Western blotting or immunohistochemistry were not included. We have now explicitly acknowledged this limitation in the revised discussion section and highlighted mechanistic studies as an important direction for future research.

2. Although the authors claim that Ch-DHA supplementation or HEK-CM treatment improved spatial learning, memory, and cognition, with EE being effective only in enhancing short-term memory, the behavioral tests used (eight-arm radial arm maze and novel object recognition) are insufficient to support this claim. This is because the eight-arm radial arm maze is designed to assess working and reference memory, while the novel object recognition test evaluates recognition memory.

Response: We agree with the reviewer that the behavioral tests used assess specific memory domains rather than global cognition. We have revised the manuscript to state that the interventions improved performance in tasks related to working, reference, and recognition memory, rather than making broad claims about overall cognition.

3. Only male mice were used in the study: why? Is it because the rearing environment affects radial-arm maze performance in male species, while its effect on females is inconsistent? Clear rationale and discussion are required.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this important comment. Male mice were selected for this study to minimize biological variability and to maximize the ability to detect the effects of choline-containing supplementation. Sex differences in choline metabolism have been reported, with females exhibiting enhanced endogenous choline synthesis due to estrogen-mediated activation of the phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase pathway. [DOI: 10.1096/fj.07-8227com] This mechanism can increase endogenous choline availability and may partially compensate for dietary choline requirements. In contrast, male mice rely more heavily on dietary sources of choline, making them generally more responsive to changes in choline intake. Therefore, the use of male mice provided a more sensitive experimental model for evaluating the effects of Ch-DHA supplementation on memory-related outcomes. We have added this rationale to the Methods section with supporting references and included the lack of female subjects as a limitation of the study in the revised Discussion section.

4. Why was the treatment of Ch combined with DHA? Both treatments are known for their neuroprotective effects. Was it because pellet itself contained Ch content (1 mg/kg), as indicated on “Pellet feed …., Pune]” (page 4, lines 6-7)?

Response: Choline and DHA were administered in combination based on prior evidence suggesting complementary and potentially synergistic roles in phosphatidylcholine synthesis, neuronal membrane formation, synaptic plasticity, and cognitive function. [DOI: 10.3390/nu11051125] We have clarified this rationale in the Introduction and added the relevant reference.

5. In the animal section, the third line on page 10 indicates that 66 middle-aged (12 to 15-month-old) CF1 male mice were housed in the animal facility, but the first line of Experimental groups indicates that n=6/group was used: there is a discrepancy considering there were six treatment groups. In addition, was the power analysis performed to calculate the number of mice used for each group?

Response: The number “66” reported in the Animals section was a typographical error. We apologise for the error. The correct total number of animals used in the study was 36, with n=6 per group across six experimental groups. This has now been corrected in the revised manuscript. Power analysis was not performed because this study was exploratory in nature. We have now acknowledged this as a limitation.

6. Were any proteins or neuroprotectants identified in the HEK-CM? Are there references supporting the experiments conducted with HEK-CM? If not, did the authors analyze the CM and assess its protein content?

Response: The conditioned media was used based on prior studies demonstrating neurotrophic effects. Previous studies have demonstrated neuroprotective potential of HEK-CM in animal models and in vitro neurodegenerative conditions attributing to endogenous upregulations of erythropoietin, BDNF and anti-apoptotic factors. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2014.07.001 & DOI: 10.1155/2014/194967] We have added references supporting the biological relevance of HEK-conditioned media and clarified this in the discussion.

7. Including the experimental protocol as a figure could enhance the understanding of the study.

Response: We thank the reviewer for the suggestion. We have included a schematic diagram of the experimental protocol in the revised manuscript.

8. The first paragraph of “Cognition” section in Discussion on page 10 should be rewritten to be understandable on the basis of the rationale of the manuscript.

9. The second paragraph of the "Cognition" section in the Discussion on page 10 needs to be revised to better align with the findings presented in the manuscript.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this valuable suggestion. The first and second paragraphs of the Cognition section have been revised to improve clarity and better align the discussion with the study rationale and findings.

Minor suggestions

1. Page 3, line 23 (Cellular senescence … organism) seems non-sense.

Response: The sentence has been revised for clarity and scientific accuracy in the revised manuscript.

2. On page 4, line 8, ad libitum and freely are redundant.

Response: The sentence has been corrected in the revised manuscript.

3. To remove olfactory cues, different ethanol concentrations of alcohol were used: 50% in eight-arm radial arm and 70% in novel object recognition. Is there any reason?

Response: In both the eight-arm radial maze and novel object recognition test, 70% ethanol was used to remove olfactory cues between trials. The manuscript has been corrected accordingly.

4. The y-axis of Figure 1 should be labeled with the full scale (e.g., 0-100) rather than a shortened range (e.g., 20-70), which exaggerates the treatment effects.

Response: The y-axis of figure has been revised to display the full scale as suggested by the reviewer.

5. English proof-reading is recommended.

Response: The manuscript has been carefully proofread, and necessary grammatical, language, and typographical corrections have been made wherever applicable.

F1000Res. 2024 Mar 21. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.159866.r241943

Reviewer response for version 3

Sareesh Narayanan Naduvil 1

Thanks for carefully addressing most of my comments and revising the paper accordingly. The paper is improved. I have no further comments to make.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Physiology, Neuroscience, Electromagnetic Biology, Learning and Memory, and Medical Education

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2023 Jun 12. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.150959.r173936

Reviewer response for version 2

Sareesh Narayanan Naduvil 1

Title: Exploring potential strategies to enhance memory and cognition in aging mice

In this paper, Shreevatsa et al., investigated the beneficial effects of potential memory-enhancing strategies like supplementation of choline (Ch) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) or administration of human embryonic kidney stem cell conditioned media (HEK-CM) or exposure to environmental enrichment (EE), in attenuating the cognitive impairments in aging mice. They demonstrate that all of these strategies have beneficial effects against normal aging-related cognitive impairments in mice with the highest potential being the supplementation of Ch-DHA and HEK-CM treatment compared to EE.

General comments: This is an interesting research work. It is very evident that the authors have meticulously planned and executed this research work. The paper is well-written. However, I suggest the authors to consider looking into the following minor aspects to further improve the paper.

Specific comments:

Abstract: 

This section is well written and all necessary information is included. However, the following minor editing’s can be considered.

  • Please write 12 as ‘Twelve’ as the authors are starting that sentence with the number 12.

  • Consider ending the same sentence as HEK-CM groups, instead of HEK-CM mice.

Introduction: 

This section is well-written with the citation of relevant pieces of literature. The authors have stated the novelty of the work along with mentioning the rationale for choosing different potential memory-enhancing strategies. 

Materials and methods:

Animals:

  • Consider writing… A total of 66 middle-aged…

  • Statements pertaining to the CF1 mouse need citation. The rationale for selecting CF1 mouse can be included briefly in the introduction with relevant citations. Please consider rephrasing the sentence describing the ‘benefits of using this animal model’. 

  • The experimental period as per this paragraph is 44 days, but the subsequent sections of the paper mention this as 30 days. Please correct this discrepancy. Otherwise, please explain what the authors meant by mentioning it as 44 days in this paragraph itself. 

Experimental groups:

  • Please refer to my above comment on the experimental period. 

  • Consider writing the last sentence… HEK-CM through intravenous (tail vein) injections…

  • It would be nice to mention the exact days on which these injections were given to the mice. Something like; the 1-5th day or 10-15th day of the experimental period. This will be helpful while replicating this methodology by other researchers. 

HEK-CM derivation:

  • I suggest the authors move the below sentence about HIHEK-CM from the discussion section to this section. 

  • “HIHEK-CM used as vehicle control for HEK-CM, has all the protein constituents of HEK-CM that are inactivated by heat and hence has no effect on cognition”.

  • If possible, authors can also describe how they have achieved this briefly as a part of the methodology.

  • Environmental enrichment: I would suggest the authors to add a brief account of how an enriched environment was provided to the animals in this study. Otherwise, please provide a citation if the authors have used a published method without any modifications. 

Novel object recognition test:

Please mention the location (object position) of the placement of novel and familiar objects. I mean, whether they were placed on the corners or more centrally in the open field? 

Statistical analysis:

The statistical tests used were adequate and appropriate for comparing the data across groups. 

Results:

  • Please consider editing the first sentence as; Aging mice supplemented ‘with’ Ch-DHA… 

  • Please read the manuscript carefully and revise this accordingly in various sections.

  • Usually, the discrimination index is reported while reporting the NORT data. If possible, it would be nice to look into this aspect too as the authors have got some interesting results in HEK-CM and Ch-DHA groups in novel object exploration. 

    The following article describes a method to calculate this manually; 

    Denninger JK, Smith BM, Kirby ED. Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget. J Vis Exp. 2018 Nov 20;(141):10.3791/58593. doi: 10.3791/58593. PMID: 30531711; PMCID: PMC6800058.

Discussion

  • Please consider avoiding repeating results in this section.

  • In view of published literature and the author’s current data, a plausible mechanism for a positive change in learning and memory in experimental groups can be proposed. This will significantly augment the discussion section. 

  • Cognition: The first paragraph is a repetition of the results and can be modified accordingly. The third paragraph has a mention of a previous study but there is no citation provided. Please provide a reference. 

  • As mentioned above, please do consider moving the following sentence to the methodology section. “HIHEK-CM used as vehicle control for HEK-CM, has all the protein constituents of HEK-CM that are inactivated by heat and hence has no effect on cognition”.

  • In view of published literature and the author’s current data, a plausible neural mechanism for how the strategies used in this study helped in preserving or improving learning & memory/cognition in aging animals can be briefly discussed without much speculation. This will be helpful in evoking further research in this area. A description of a few limitations of the current study would also enrich the discussion section. 

Conclusion:

The conclusion is concise and appropriately written.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Physiology, Neuroscience, Electromagnetic Biology, Learning and Memory, and Medical Education

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

References

F1000Res. 2023 Dec 7.
Prof Kiranmai S Rai 1

The following (written in BOLD) provides brief details about the corrections and modifications made in the revised manuscript under different sections, in accordance with the suggestions from the reviewer.

Materials and Methods:

In the revised manuscript, the experimental and treatment periods have been clearly defined. The rationale for selecting mice has been moved to the introduction section from this part and cited appropriately, as suggested. Additionally, details about the vehicle control and HIHEK-CM have been modified based on suggestions and have been relocated from the discussion section to this part. The revised manuscript also provides specific information on how the environmental enrichment was administered. In response to the reviewer's query regarding object positioning during the novel object recognition test (NORT), the objects were centrally placed within the open field, ensuring an equal distance between each object and the sides of the field. This clarification has been incorporated into the revised manuscript.

Results:

Minor corrections and modifications suggested have been incorporated in the result section. Regarding the analysis of the discrimination index in the NORT, we clarify that only the number of visits to the objects was counted during the test session, and due to the inability to record object exploration time, the discrimination index could not be reported. We are open and appreciative of these suggestions, and we will duly consider them in our ongoing and future research endeavours.

Discussion:

The discussion section has undergone comprehensive modification and revision based on the provided suggestions. The limitations of the current study are also outlined in the end of the discussion section.

F1000Res. 2023 Mar 9. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.133839.r164703

Reviewer response for version 1

Kumar MR Bhat 1

The work is very well conceptualized and objectives are designed.  All sections of the article are well written. Results are encouraging further research in this area of age and cognition. 

Abstract - sufficient

Introduction - covers all necessary information to understand the objectives and its importance

Methodology - overall content are good enough. However, few details about need to use of CF1 mouse would be important in this study.

Result - good descriptions

Discussion - can be enriched if the explain about:

  1. molecular mechanism of Ch and DHA in relation to cognition

  2. microconstituents of HEK media and its effect on cognition

  3. possible mechanism about how EE works on cognition

Was there any signs of immune reactions due to HEK media? What are the difference between HEK-CM AND HIHEK-CM in terms of constituents and its effect on immune system and cognition?

The author needs to make an attempt to explain the possible reasons for differences in the results after exposure to different enhancing agents.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Human gross anatomy, Neuroanatomy, neurobehaviour, Natural medicine and their mechanism of actions in human diseases, cancer biology, molecular biology.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2023 May 6.
Prof Kiranmai S Rai 1

Methodology -  However, few details about need to use of CF1 mouse would be important in this study.

Answer: CF1mice were used as they genetically resembles human gene and also since these mice are smaller in size the total cost for the experiments was lesser.

Discussion - can be enriched if the explain about:

  1. molecular mechanism of Ch and DHA in relation to cognition:  Choline is known to  enhance cholinergic function and DHA is an essential nutrient that helps development of neurons / neurogenesis, synaptogenesis / synaptic plasticity in hippocampus which enhances cognitive abilities

  2. microconstituents of HEK media and its effect on cognition- HEK conditioned media  are excellent sources of neurotrophic factors and cytokines. Furthermore, the conditioned medium contains known neuroprotectants such as erythropoietin (EPO) and other cytokines. Previous studies show that these neurotrophic factors enhance cognition.

  3. possible mechanism about how EE works on cognition: Previous studies revealed that exposure to EE has stimulating effect on neurogenesis, enhances granule cell layer and increases number of dentate gyrus granule cells in the hippocampus. Further, long-term EE exposure prevents age-associated cognitive impairment by increasing cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) level in the hippocampus which potentially contributes to improved cognitive abilities such as learning and memory in aged animals.[Ref. -in revised version]

Was there any signs of immune reactions due to HEK media? - No

What are the difference between HEK-CM AND HIHEK-CM in terms of constituents and its effect on immune system and cognition?

HIHEK-CM- used as vehicle control for HEK CM, has all the protein constituents inactivated by heat, hence has no effect on immune system and cognition

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    Underlying data

    Dryad: Data for Radial arm maze tests and Novel object recognition test, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.xpnvx0kj3. 50

    This project contains the following underlying data:

    File 1. Percentage_of_correct_choices-Learning_phase.csv (Percentage of correct choices made by mice during learning phase of eight arm radial maze test)

    File 2. Working_memory_error.csv (Number of working memory errors made by mice during trial phase of eight arm radial maze test)

    File 3. Reference_memory_error.csv (Number of reference memory errors made by mice during trial phase of eight arm radial maze test)

    File 4. Percentage_of_correct_choices-Retention_phase (Percentage of correct choices made by mice during retention phase of eight arm radial maze test)

    File 5. Visits_to_familiar_object.csv (Number of visits to familiar object made by mice during the test phase of novel object recognition test)

    File 6. Visits_to_novel_object.csv (Number of visits to novel object made by mice during the test phase of novel object recognition test)

    Reporting guidelines

    Dryad: ARRIVE checklist for ‘Exploring potential strategies to enhance memory and cognition in aging mice ’. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.xpnvx0kj3. 50

    Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES