Abstract
The duration of the pigeon's key peck was differentially reinforced in either a trials or a free-operant procedure. Mean emitted peck duration was a power function of the duration required for food delivery to occur. The exponents of the power function differed considerably from those observed in earlier research involving longer duration responses in pigeons and other species. The coefficients of variation also did not correspond with those of the earlier research on other responses, nor did consideration of the durations actually reinforced resolve the differences. Duration was neither a function of response rate nor of intermittency of reinforcement. Key-peck duration was changed in an orderly way by differential reinforcement. However, it appeared to be more strongly determined by its duration in the absence of differential reinforcement than were longer duration responses.
Keywords: temporal psychophysics, key-peck duration, differential reinforcement, base duration, key peck, pigeons
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Decasper A. J., Zeiler M. D. Time limits for completing fixed ratios. IV. Components of the ratio. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Mar;27(2):235–244. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwartz B. Two types of pigeon key pecking: suppression of long- but not short-duration key pecks by duration-dependent shock. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Mar;27(2):393–398. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwartz B., Williams D. R. The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 May;17(3):351–357. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]