Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1980 May;33(3):383–395. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-383

Long-term potential for imprinting in ducks and chickens

Leonard A Eiserer
PMCID: PMC1332963  PMID: 16812171

Abstract

In the first of five experiments, three of four adult ducks who had been reared in visual isolation gradually developed strong approach responses towards a moving panel of colored lights. Experiment 2 provided evidence that the ducks' approach response reflected the same sort of social attachment that is typically formed to moving objects by newly hatched ducklings. Experiment 3 revealed that the fourth duck would not approach the moving stimulus even after additional exposure to it, but would approach a conspecific after group housing had been enforced for seven days. In Experiment 4, none of five adult chickens who had been reared in visual isolation developed approach responses towards the moving stimulus, even though in Experiment 5, newly hatched chicks approached the stimulus quite readily. Taken together, these findings (a) indicate that ducks retain the ability to form filial-type attachments to novel objects throughout their lives, and (b) offer preliminary evidence that chickens do not retain this ability into adulthood.

Keywords: imprinting, critical period, species differences, ducks, chickens

Full text

PDF
383

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andrew R. J. The relation between the following response and precocious adult behaviour in the chick. Anim Behav. 1966 Oct;14(4):501–505. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3472(66)80051-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boyd H., Fabricius E. Observations on the incidence of following of visual and auditory stimuli in naive mallard ducklings (Anas platyrhynchos). Behaviour. 1965;25(1):1–15. doi: 10.1163/156853965x00093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown R. T. Following and visual imprinting in ducklings across a wide age range. Dev Psychobiol. 1975 Jan;8(1):27–33. doi: 10.1002/dev.420080104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GOTTLIEB G. Developmental age as a baseline for determination of the critical period in imprinting. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1961 Aug;54:422–427. doi: 10.1037/h0049127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GOTTLIEB G. Following-response initiation in ducklings: age and sensory stimulation. Science. 1963 Apr 26;140(3565):399–400. doi: 10.1126/science.140.3565.399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Graves H. B. Early social responses in gallus: a functional analysis. Science. 1973 Nov 30;182(4115):937–939. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4115.937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HESS E. H. Imprinting, an effect of early experience, imprinting determines later social behavior in animals. Science. 1959 Jul 17;130(3368):133–141. doi: 10.1126/science.130.3368.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoffman H. S., Ratner A. M., Eiserer L. A., Grossman D. J. Aggressive behavior in immature ducklings. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1974 Apr;86(4):569–580. doi: 10.1037/h0036161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hoffman H. S., Ratner A. M., Eiserer L. A. Role of visual imprinting in the emergence of specific filial attachments in ducklings. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1972 Dec;81(3):399–409. doi: 10.1037/h0033697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoffman H. S., Stratton J. W., Newby V. The control of feeding behavior by an imprinted stimulus. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):847–860. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. JAYNES J. Imprinting: the interaction of learned and innate behavior. II. The critical period. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1957 Feb;50(1):6–10. doi: 10.1037/h0044716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MOLTZ H., ROSENBLUM L., HALIKAS N. Imprinting and level of anxiety. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1959 Apr;52(2):240–244. doi: 10.1037/h0042558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MOLTZ H., STETINER L. J. The influence of patterned-light deprivation on the critical period for imprinting. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1961 Jun;54:279–283. doi: 10.1037/h0046991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ratner A. M. Modification of ducklings' filial behavior by aversive stimulation. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1976 Jul;2(3):266–284. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.2.3.266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wilson G. F. Early experience and facilitation of feeding in domestic chicks. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1968 Dec;66(3):800–802. doi: 10.1037/h0026536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES