Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1979 Nov;32(3):305–321. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-305

Operant and nonoperant vocal responding in the mynah: Complex schedule control and deprivation-induced responding

D F Hake, J Mabry
PMCID: PMC1332973  PMID: 16812153

Abstract

Several recent studies have been concerned with operant responses that are also affected by nonoperant factors, (e.g., biological constraints, innate behavior patterns, respondent processes). The major reason for studying mynah vocal responding concerned the special relation of avian vocalizations to nonoperant emotional and reflexive systems. The research strategy was to evaluate operant and nonoperant control by comparing the schedule control obtained with the vocal response to that characteristic of the motor responses of other animals. We selected single, multiple, and chain schedules that ordinarily produce disparate response rates at predictable times. In multiple schedules with one component where vocal responding (“Awk”) was reinforced with food (fixed-ratio or fixed-interval schedule) and one where the absence of vocal responding was reinforced (differential reinforcement of other behavior), response rates never exceeded 15 responses per minute, but clear schedule differences developed in response rate and pause time. Nonoperant vocal responding was evident when responding endured across 50 extinction sessions at 25% to 40% of the rate during reinforcement. The “enduring extinction responding” was largely deprivation induced, because the operant-level of naive mynahs under food deprivation was comparable in magnitude, but without deprivation the operant level was much lower. Food deprivation can induce vocal responding, but the relatively precise schedule control indicated that operant contingencies predominate when they are introduced.

Keywords: deprivation-induced responding, DRO, multiple schedule, chain schedule, operant level, extinction, vocal responding, mynahs

Full text

PDF
305

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BAUMEISTER A., HAWKINS W. F., CROMWELL R. L. NEED STATES AND ACTIVITY LEVEL. Psychol Bull. 1964 Jun;61:438–453. doi: 10.1037/h0047136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boakes R. A., Poli M., Lockwood M. J., Goodall G. A study of misbehavior: token reinforcement in the rat. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Jan;29(1):115–134. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown P. L., Jenkins H. M. Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):1–8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GINSBURG N. CONDITIONED TALKING IN THE MYNAH BIRD. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1963 Dec;56:1061–1063. doi: 10.1037/h0047774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GINSBURG N. Conditioned vocalization in the budgerigar. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1960 Apr;53:183–186. doi: 10.1037/h0048391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gardner R. A., Gardner B. T. Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee. Science. 1969 Aug 15;165(3894):664–672. doi: 10.1126/science.165.3894.664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hake D. F., Campbell R. L. Characteristics and response-displacement effects of shock-generated responding during negative reinforcement procedures: pre-shock responding and post-shock aggressive responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 May;17(3):303–323. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoffman H. S., Searle J. L., Toffey S., Kozma F. Behavioral control by an imprinted stimulus. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 May;9(3):177–189. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. LANE H. Control of vocal responding in chickens. Science. 1960 Jul 1;132(3418):37–38. doi: 10.1126/science.132.3418.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LANE H. Operant control of vocalizing in the chicken. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Apr;4:171–177. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Leander J. D., Milan M. A., Jasper K. B., Heaton K. L. Schedule control of the vocal behavior of Cebus monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Mar;17(2):229–235. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lilly J. C. Vocal Mimicry in Tursiops: Ability to Match Numbers and Durations of Human Vocal Bursts. Science. 1965 Jan 15;147(3655):300–301. doi: 10.1126/science.147.3655.300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MOLLIVER M. E. Operant control of vocal behavior in the cat. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:197–202. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Marler P. Birdsong and speech development: could there be parallels? Am Sci. 1970 Nov-Dec;58(6):669–673. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pear J. J., Moody J. E., Persinger M. A. Lever attacking by rats during free-operant avoidance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Nov;18(3):517–523. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Premack D. A functional analysis of language. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jul;14(1):107–125. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. SALZINGER K., WALLER M. B. The operant control of vocalization in the dog. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Jul;5:383–389. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schusterman R. J., Balliet R. F. Conditioned vocalizations as a technique for determining visual acuity thresholds in sea lions. Science. 1970 Jul 31;169(3944):498–501. doi: 10.1126/science.169.3944.498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES