Abstract
Background
Fabry disease (FD) is a rare X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by pathogenic GLA gene mutations, leading to deficient α-galactosidase A (α-GalA) activity and systemic accumulation of globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) and its derivatives. It is characterized by progressive multi-organ damage, especially nephropathy and cardiomyopathy. Agalsidase beta (Fabrazyme; Sanofi, Paris) for enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) has been approved in China. We report the clinical outcomes of two Chinese adult male FD patients with proteinuria treated with agalsidase beta.
Cases presentation
Two Chinese male patients with classic FD phenotypes and proteinuria were treated with agalsidase beta (1 mg/kg every two weeks). Case 1 (last followed up at age 34,GLA c.493G > T mutation) developed proteinuria at age 23, presented with severe renal impairment, and underwent kidney transplantation at approximately age 32 after receiving ERT for 21 months prior to transplantation. Post-transplant, his renal function stabilized (creatinine <115 μmol/L) with resolved proteinuria.Renal recovery was primarily attributed to transplantation, while ERT contributed to systemic control. His plasma Lyso-Gb3 decreased by 70.6% (93.33 to 27.38 ng/mL). Case 2 (last followed up at age 40, GLA c.1201T > C mutation) developed proteinuria at age 30, had stage 2 chronic kidney disease and left ventricular hypertrophy. Following genetic confirmation at age 36, he initiated ERT at age 37, with initial irregular dosing due to social factors and economic pressure, then transitioned to standardized biweekly dosing at age 38. After approximately 4 years of ERT, his Lyso-Gb3 decreased by 68.5% (79.17 to 24.93 ng/mL). His proteinuria improved (2195.52 to 1834.34 mg/24 h) with unchanged RAAS blocker doses. Both patients also experienced regression of some symptoms, including neuropathic pain and gastrointestinal discomfort, and tolerated the therapy well with no infusion-related adverse events.
Conclusions
In these two cases, agalsidase beta was well-tolerated and associated with stabilization of renal and cardiac function. The management of proteinuria required concomitant RAAS inhibition. Family cascade screening remains critical for early diagnosis.
Keywords: agalsidase beta, case series, Chinese population, enzyme replacement therapy, fabry disease, renal transplantation
Introduction
Fabry disease (FD, OMIM #301500) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the GLA gene, leading to deficient α-galactosidase A (α-GalA) activity and subsequent systemic accumulation of globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) and its deacylated derivative, lyso-globotriaosylsphingosine (Lyso-Gb3) (1–3). Reported birth prevalence varies widely depending on the population studied, ranging from 1 in 40,000 for the classic phenotype in males to as high as 1 in 3,000 when including later-onset forms and females identified through newborn screening (2, 3). Progressive multi-organ damage—particularly nephropathy, cardiomyopathy, and neuropathy—defines its clinical trajectory (2, 3). Notably, Lyso-Gb3, a biomarker of disease severity, directly induces podocyte injury and renal fibrosis, contributing to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), which accounts for the leading cause of FD-related mortality (4, 5).FD remains a significant therapeutic challenge, although current treatments have markedly improved outcomes. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), the primary treatment for FD, includes agalsidase-α (derived from human fibroblasts) and agalsidase beta (Fabrazyme, produced in Chinese hamster ovary cells) (6). The 2017 KDIGO conference highlighted ERT's role in alleviating cardiovascular and renal complications (7). However, long-term data specific to Chinese patients remain limited (8). Studies demonstrate that treatment with agalsidase beta at the approved dose of 1 mg/kg body weight every other week significantly reduces plasma globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) levels (6), decreases Gb3 deposition in critical organs (e.g., heart and kidneys), mitigates organ-related symptoms, lowers mortality risk, and improves patients’ quality of life. Additionally, agalsidase beta has been shown to alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms and neuropathic pain (9).Agalsidase beta (Fabrazyme) was approved in China in 2019. While long-term data on the safety and efficacy of agalsidase beta exist globally, published clinical experience in Chinese patients, particularly those with established renal involvement, remains limited. This report aims to contribute a reference point for FD treatment in China and throughout Asia.
Methods
All clinical, laboratory, and imaging assessments were performed using standardized institutional protocols to ensure consistency and reproducibility. Cardiac assessment was performed using echocardiography according to the American Society of Echocardiography guidelines and renal evaluation used standardized eGFR, 24 h urinary protein. Lyso-Gb3 and α-GalA activity were measured using consistent LC-MS/MS and fluorometric assays, with intra-assay CV <5% and inter-assay CV <8%, ensuring longitudinal consistency of biomarker measurements.
Case report
Case 1
A Chinese male (last followed up at age 34), reporting a history of hypohidrosis since early childhood and a progression of distal extremity neuropathic pain for over 20 years. Since early childhood, he exhibited hypohidrosis and elevated skin temperature in the extremities. By age 9, he developed burning and tingling paresthesias in the distal limbs with variable intensity, followed by irregular bowel movements at age 10. Extremity pain gradually subsided by age 20. At 22, he experienced intermittent blurred vision, and proteinuria was detected at age 23. By 27, he reported bilateral tinnitus and postprandial left lower quadrant pain, followed by skin pruritus and brown plaques at age 28. Renal biopsy at age 28 confirmed Fabry nephropathy (Figure 1). By 30, he presented with frothy urine suggestive of proteinuria, loose stools, and transient precordial tingling episodes resolving spontaneously.
Figure 1.
Light Microscopy, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy findings of renal biopsy in case 1 (diagnosed at age 28). (A) Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining (×100). (B) Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining (×200). (C) Periodic acid-silver methenamine (PASM) staining (×400). (D) Toluidine blue staining (×400). (E) Immunofluorescence staining for IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, C4, and C1q (all negative). (F) Transmission electron microscopy [×(insert magnification)]. Arrow legends: (A) Red arrows, global glomerulosclerosis; blue arrow, interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration. (B) Red arrow, global glomerulosclerosis; green arrow, segmental glomerulosclerosis. (C) Yellow arrows, podocyte swelling with vacuolated cytoplasm. (D) Red arrows, interstitial lipid deposits. (E) No immune complex or complement deposition. (F) Red arrows, numerous zebra bodies (myeloid bodies) within podocyte cytoplasm.
Physical examination at diagnosis (age 28–30) revealed a blood pressure of 149/93 mmHg, multiple variably sized brown round plaques with scattered scaling and rough surfaces on the trunk/limbs, and 2-mm non-blanching erythematous papules over the lumbar/abdominal regions. A pinpoint rash was observed on the right upper limb (little finger and metacarpophalangeal joints). Sensory disturbances with mildly heightened tactile sensitivity involved bilateral wrists, 10 cm proximal to the ankles, and the proximal interphalangeal joints of hands/first-second toes. Skin temperature asymmetry was noted (left foot cooler, right warmer).
Laboratory data at age 29 showed severe renal dysfunction (creatinine 430 μmol/L, urea 14.32 mmol/L, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, by CKD-EPI equation) of 15.0 mL/min/1.73m2, proteinuria 3.35 g/24 h), supported by renal ultrasound showing chronic kidney disease features. By 31, cardiac ultrasound revealed mild interventricular septal thickening (IVSd 12 mm), while audiometry detected right-sided mild sensorineural hearing loss. Fundoscopy indicated retinal vascular abnormalities.
Genetic testing detected a GLA missense variant (c.493G > T, p.Asp165Tyr). Biochemical assays confirmed severe α-GalA deficiency (0.37 vs. 2.4–17.65 µmol/L/h) and elevated lyso-Gb3 (93.33 ng/mL, normal <1.11 via MSMS), establishing Fabry disease. Familial screening revealed positive diagnoses in the patient's mother and daughter.
Post-diagnosis, carbamazepine was initiated for pain management. At age 30, biweekly agalsidase beta (1 mg/kg) was started. Due to progressive renal failure, peritoneal dialysis was initiated at age 31. After 21 months of ERT (at approximately age 32), right kidney transplantation was performed for CKD stage 5 and hypertension. ERT continued post-transplantation.
Peritoneal dialysis led to creatinine rebound and persistent urea fluctuations (Figures 2b, c). Post-transplant, creatinine (<115 μmol/L) and urea (<8.6 mmol/L) normalized (Figures 2b, c), with resolved proteinuria and stable BP (115/65 mmHg). The normalization of renal function was mainly attributed to kidney transplantation; continuous ERT contributed to reducing systemic Lyso-Gb3 and preventing Gb3 redeposition in the graft, rather than reversing native renal failure.
Figure 2.
Renal function parameters in case 1 (last followed up at age 34). (a) Short-term dynamics of urinary microalbumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR, normal <30 mg/g) during the first 40 days of ERT initiation. (b,c) Longitudinal changes in serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels. The vertical dashed line at Month 21 indicates the time of kidney transplantation, which was performed after 21 months of ERT. ERT was initiated at Month 0 (age 30).
Concomitant medications included carbamazepine for pain and post-transplantation immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil and antihypertensives.
Following 4.2 years of ERT, Lyso-Gb3 decreased to 27.38 ng/mL (70.6% reduction). Pain improved markedly (VAS score from 7 to 1). Hypohidrosis, gastrointestinal symptoms, heat intolerance, visual disturbances, and right-sided tinnitus all improved. Angiokeratomas remained stable. Transplanted kidney function, blood pressure (115/65 mmHg), and cardiac parameters (IVSd reduced from 12 mm to 11 mm) were within normal ranges.
Case 2
A Chinese male (last followed up at age 40, initially presenting at age 36) reported a 30-year history of nonpruritic left inner thigh rash (non-blanching pinpoint erythema), proteinuria, and a 1-year chest tightness. His clinical history included a red pinpoint rash on the left inner thigh without itching or pain and discoloration when pressed, childhood-onset hypohidrosis (age 8) and chronic diarrhea (loose stools from age 15). Proteinuria was first detected at age 30. At age 35, cardiac ultrasound revealed left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), which raised clinical suspicion.
Genetic confirmation of Fabry disease was obtained at age 36.RAAS blockade (valsartan 80 mg qd and empagliflozin 10 mg qd) was initiated immediately after diagnosis at age 36. ERT was started one year later at age 37. Due to social factors and economic pressure, the initial dosing was irregular (1 mg/kg every 3–4 weeks), which temporarily attenuated biomarker reduction and treatment efficacy, highlighting the importance of treatment adherence for optimal outcomes. At age 38, the patient transitioned to standardized biweekly dosing (1 mg/kg, approximately 70 mg based on body weight), which was well-tolerated without adverse events.
Physical examination: At age 36, renal biopsy suggested Fabry nephropathy (Figure 3), with normal renal function but elevated proteinuria (2195.52 mg/24 h). Echocardiography at age 38 demonstrated mild septal/posterior wall thickening (IVSd 12 mm, LVPW 12 mm) with preserved systolic/diastolic function. Cerebral MRA at age 39 revealed hypoplasia of the right posterior cerebral artery P3-04 segment, consistent with a congenital vascular anomaly.
Figure 3.
Electron microscopy and immunofluorescence findings of renal biopsy in case 2 (diagnosed at age 36). (A) Transmission electron microscopy showing numerous zebra bodies (myeloid bodies) within podocytes [×(insert magnification)]. (B) Immunofluorescence staining for immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgM) and complement components (C3, C4, C1q) showing no immune complex deposition. Arrow legends: (A) Red arrows, zebra bodies (myeloid bodies) in podocyte cytoplasm.
Genetic testing detected a pathogenic GLA missense variant (c.1201T > C, p.Ser401Pro). This variant was predicted to be probably damaging by PolyPhen-2 (HumDiv score 0.974). Biochemical assays confirmed severe α-GalA deficiency (0.37µmol/L/h, normal: 2.4–17.65) and elevated lyso-Gb3 (79.17 ng/mL, normal <1.11 via MSMS), establishing Fabry disease. Familial screening revealed positive diagnoses in his brother and daughter.
Following approximately 3.6 years of ERT, Lyso-Gb3 decreased to 24.93 ng/mL (68.5% reduction). Clinical improvements included partial regression of angiokeratoma, reduced proteinuria (from 2195.52 to 1834.34 mg/24 h), and improved hypohidrosis and diarrhea. Neuropathic pain improved (VAS score from 5 to 1), and hypohidrosis/gastrointestinal symptoms improved from “severe” to “mild” on a 5-point Likert scale. Cardiac remodeling showed slow progression (IVSd/LVPW from 12 mm to 13 mm).
Discussion
Current literature on the efficacy and safety of agalsidase beta in FD patients with proteinuria as the predominant symptom remains sparse globally (Table 1). A PubMed search (keywords: Fabry disease, ERT, proteinuria; filtered by case reports, 2000-2023) yielded 13 publications, with 5 meeting inclusion criteria after manual screening. Fabry disease exemplifies the challenges of genotype-phenotype discordance, where identical GLA mutations can manifest with divergent clinical trajectories.This variability may be explained by epigenetic modifiers, environmental factors, residual α-GalA activity, and cellular stress responses such as the unfolded protein response (UPR) induced by misfolded mutant proteins, which can independently contribute to cellular dysfunction (10–14). This variability, emphasized in KDIGO guidelines, contributes to diagnostic delays averaging 10–15 years—a critical barrier to early intervention.
Table 1.
Adult fabry disease cases with proteinuria receiving intravenous agalsidase beta.
| Reference | Stanisława Bazan-Socha (33) | S. Taneda (34) | Bun Sheng (35) | Andy Sing Ong Tang (36) | Shinji Kume (37) | Case 1 (This study) | Case 2 (This study) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years | 2007 | 2013 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2025 | 2025 | ||
| Age/Sex | 48y/M | 46y/M | 46y/M | 44y/M | 52y/F | 46y/M | 48y/F | 34y/M at last follow-up | 40y/M at last follow-up |
| Age of diagnosis | 38y | 36y | 43y | 40y | 48y | 39y | 36y | 28y | 36y |
| Mutant gene | 1235del115/insA | NR | p.N215S c.644A > G [p.Asn215Ser] |
c.610 T > C (p.Trp204Arg) | c.288G > A (p.Met96Ile) | c.493G > T(p.Asp165Tyr) | c.1201T > C(p.Ser401Pro) | ||
|
α-GalA (μmol/L/h) |
0.12↓ | 0.20↓ | ↓ | 0.27↓ | 1.07↓ | 0↓ | 0.2↓ | 0.37↓ | 0.37↓ |
| Lyso-Gb3 (ng/mL) | NR | NR | ↑ | 1.17↑ | Normal | 22.0↑ | NR | 93.33↑ | 79.17↑ |
| Initial symptom | Glomerulonep-hritis | Sudden hearing impairment | Renal insufficiency | Proteinuria (12.9 g/d) | Proteinuria (1.25 g/d) | Proteinuria (1 g/d) | Proteinuria (2.25 g/gcr) | Proteinuria; Acroparesthesias | Proteinuria; Skin rash |
| Main symptoms | Proteinuria (4.7 g/d); Angiokeratoma; Eye changes; Paresthesia | Mild proteinuria (0.78 g/d); Angiokeratoma; Lymphoedema of the lower limbs; Pre-excitation syndrome; Myocardial hypertrophy | Renal dysfunction before and after renal transplantation, including proteinuria, presence of mulberry cells and increase of the serum creatinine | Proteinuria; Progressive lower limb edema; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy | Proteinuria | Proteinuria and edema; Cornea-verticillata; Angiokeratoma | Proteinuria (2.25 g/gcr); hyperuricemia | Proteinuria; Angiokeratoma; Hypohidrosis; Tinnitus | Proteinuria; Angiokeratoma; Diarrhea; Left Ventricular Hypertrophy |
| Renal transplantation | No | No | Yes, before ERT | Yes, after ERT | No | No | No | Yes(during ERT) | No |
| First time of ERT | 43y | 41y | About 44y | 40y | 48y | 44y | 36y | 30y | 37y |
| Dosage and Duration | Agalsidase beta 1.0 mg/kg q2w For four and a half years |
Agalsidase beta 1.0 mg/kg q2w For 16 times |
Agalsidase beta 1.0 mg/kg q2w For four years |
Agalsidase beta 1.0 mg/kg q2w For two years |
Agalsidase alfa 0.2 mg/kg q2w for 6 years→Agalsidase beta 1.0 mg/kg q2w for 6 years→+losartan (25 mg/day) for 10 years→+febuxostat for 1 years | Agalsidase beta 1.0 mg/kg q2w For 4.2 years | Agalsidase beta 1.0 mg/kg q2w (irregular 1.5y -> standard 2.1y) Total 3.6 years | ||
| Adverse Events | Shivers and dyspnea during infusion | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | No | No |
| Treatment outcomes | Improvement observed in all aspects, particularly in the stabilization of kidney function, cardiac hypertrophy and CNS abnormalities. | Improved. 1.Mulberry cells disappeared within 1 month of the initiation of ERT. 2.A slight lowering of the serum creatinine level. 3.low-level proteinuria was still detected. |
Improved in heart and Lyso-Gb3, but not proteinuria before renal transplantation. | Improved in proteinuria (0.42 g/d). | Proteinuria and renal function remained stable. | 1.Agalsidase alfa: no significant change in proteinuria; cardiac hypertrophy progressed. 2.Agalsidase beta: proteinuria was refractory; mild elevation in systolic blood pressure. 3.+losartan: systolic blood pressure improved, proteinuria remained unchanged. 4.+febuxostat: eGFR showed slight recovery. |
Renal function stable post-transplant; Lyso-Gb3 decreased 70.6%; Pain improved. | Proteinuria improved; Lyso-Gb3 decreased 68.5%; GI symptoms improved. | |
The GLA c.493G > T variant identified in Case 1 is registered in the Fabry Database (http://fabry-database.org/mutants/), however, the clinical data remains scarce. Although this mutation has been reported, the associated phenotypes varied (Table 2). Case 2 involved a de novo mutation, which was predicted to be probably damaging by PolyPhen-2, with a score of 97.4% in the HumDiv database and 48.5% in HumVar (Figure 4) (15).
Table 2.
Two different clinical manifestations of the same mutation—GLA c.493G>T (p.Asp165Tyr).
| Characteristics | F20-A (16) | Case 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | Man | Man |
| Age at onset/diagnosis (year) | 5/19 | 9/28 |
| Clinical phenotypes | Classic | Classic |
| Family history | Positive | Positive |
| Angiokeratoma | No | Yes |
| Acroparesthesias | Yes | Yes |
| Hypohidrosis | Yes | Yes |
| Ocularchanges | Yes | Yes |
| Hearing loss | No | Yes |
| Proteinuria | Yes | Yes |
| Baseline eGFR | 98.97 | 15.00 |
| Left ventricular hypertrophy | No | Yes |
| Hypertension | No | Yes |
| Cerebrovascular | No | No |
| α-gal A (μmol/L/h) | 0.19 | 0.37 |
F20-A refers to a previously reported patient from the Fabry Database (fabry-database.org) with the same mutation.
Figure 4.
In silico pathogenicity prediction for the de novo GLA variant (NM_000169.2:c.1201T > C; p.Ser401Pro) identified in Case 2. PolyPhen-2 analysis using (A) HumDiv model (score: 0.974, “probably damaging”) and (B) HumVar model (score: 0.485, “possibly damaging”). The horizontal dashed lines indicate the classification thresholds.
Lyso-Gb3 accumulation correlates with organ damage severity (5), while the impact of residual GLA activity on clinical phenotype remains debated (16, 17). In this study, both patients had identical α-GalA activity (0.37 µmol/L/h) but distinct clinical profiles (Table 3).Notably, Case 1's higher baseline Lyso-Gb3 (93.33 vs. 79.17 ng/mL) correlated with more rapid renal progression, underscoring Lyso-Gb3's role as a biomarker. Conversely, a previously reported patient (F20-A) with the same c.493G > T mutation showed milder manifestations despite lower α-GalA activity than Case 1 (Table 2).
Table 3.
Comparison of clinical signs and symptoms between case 1 and case 2 at baseline and after approximately 3-4 years of agalsidase beta treatment.
| Items | Case1 Baseline | Case1 Last follow-up |
Case2 Baseline | Case2 Last follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | Male | ||
| Diagnosed age (years old) | 28 | 36 | ||
| Last follow-up age (years old) | 34 | 40 | ||
| α-GalA(μmol/L/h) | 0.37 | 0.37 | ||
| Plasma Lyso-Gb3(ng/mL) | 93.33 | 27.38 | 79.17 | 24.93 |
| Immunoglobulin G anti-agalsidase alfa antibody | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| Angiokeratoma | +(the whole body) | No significant change | + (Left groin) | Partially disappeared |
| Small fiber neuropathy | ||||
| Sweating abnormality | Hypohidrosis | Improved | Hypohidrosis | Improved |
| Subjective Feeling | Elevated skin temperature | Frequency reduced | Normal | Normal |
| Pain | Distal limb pain | Frequency and degree reduced | Normal | Normal |
| Gastrointestinal symptoms | Left lower abdominal pain after eating; diarrhea | No pain; Frequency reduced |
Diarrhea | Improved |
| Hearing symptoms | Tinnitus | Improved | Normal | Normal |
| Ocular symptoms | Occasional blurred vision | Normal | Normal | Normal |
| Cerebrovascular symptoms | Normal | Normal | P3-04 segment of right posterior cerebral artery (congenital) | |
| Cardiovascular events | ||||
| Cardiac symptoms | Slight interventricular septal thickening | Improved | LV posterior wall and septal thickening | Progress but slowly |
| Hypertension(mmHg) | 149/93 | Post-transplant: 115/65 | 103–125/49–59 | 105/65 |
| Renal findings | ||||
| UREA(mmol/L) | 14.32 | Pre-transplant: unchanged; post: normal | Normal | Normal |
| CREA(μmol/L) | 430 | Pre-transplant: increased; post: normal | Normal | Normal |
| Urinary protein | ++ | Pre-transplant: ++; post: – | ++ | + |
Biomarkers were measured with validated and consistent analytical methods across all follow-up visits.
Early ERT initiation is paramount before the onset of irreversible organ damage (6). The Fabry Outcome Survey advocates treatment before adolescence to prevent irreversible organ damage (18–20). Our patients started ERT at ages 30 (Case 1) and 37 (Case 2), after significant disease manifestation. Despite late initiation, both reported improvement in certain symptoms (e.g., neuropathic pain, gastrointestinal discomfort), suggesting that some clinical features may be partially reversible. However, our findings reinforce that ERT exerts limited efficacy in reversing advanced renal fibrosis and end-stage organ damage. This is best illustrated by Case 1's poor response during peritoneal dialysis, where persistent proteinuria and hypercreatininemia highlighted ERT's reduced efficacy in late-stage CKD. These cases reinforce that earlier ERT initiation—prior to the development of significant glomerulosclerosis—is associated with more favorable renal outcomes (4, 9, 21, 22).
A major concern is disentangling the contribution of each intervention from concurrent therapies. In Case 2, proteinuria improved while RAAS blocker doses remained strictly unchanged, indicating an add-on effect of ERT to stable RAAS blockade. In Case 1, dramatic renal recovery (creatinine normalization, proteinuria resolution) occurred only after kidney transplantation (performed after 21 months of ERT). Hence, transplantation was the primary driver of renal restoration, while ERT contributed to systemic substrate (Lyso-Gb3) reduction and graft protection, rather than reversing native renal failure. Notably, irregular ERT dosing in Case 2 due to social factors and economic pressure temporarily attenuated biomarker reduction and treatment efficacy, highlighting the critical importance of treatment adherence for optimal outcomes.
Beyond renal outcomes, both patients demonstrated systemic benefits of ERT. Case 2 showed partial regression of angiokeratoma, and both patients reported improvement in small fiber neuropathy-related symptoms (e.g., hypohidrosis, acroparesthesia, gastrointestinal discomfort). These findings align with studies demonstrating ERT-mediated Gb3 clearance in dermal and neural tissues (23, 24). However, Case 1's stable angiokeratomas may reflect advanced disease irreversibility, suggesting tissue-specific therapeutic thresholds. Ophthalmologic findings were satisfactory: Case 1 had no corneal deposits and stabilized retinal vasculopathy, which contrasts with a previous report showing no apparent protective effect of ERT on retinal vasculopathy (25).
The impact of ERT on left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) remains contentious (26). Case 1 showed a reduction in interventricular septal thickness (12 mm → 11 mm) after 4.2 years of ERT and post-transplant blood pressure normalization, which is consistent with previous reports demonstrating that agalsidase beta effectively reduces myocardial hypertrophy in FD patients (27). In contrast, Case 2 exhibited slow progression of LVH (IVSd 12 mm → 13 mm) over 3.6 years of ERT, possibly due to shorter treatment duration or genetic modifiers. The absence of anti-drug antibody (ADA) monitoring is a notable limitation, as ADA may affect treatment efficacy and tolerability in individual patients (28, 29). Additionally, the lack of post-transplant renal biopsy precludes direct assessment of Gb3 deposition in the graft.
Despite these limitations, the safety profile of agalsidase beta was favorable in both patients. Both patients tolerated agalsidase beta without infusion-related adverse events, consistent with global safety profiles where severe reactions occur in <5% of cases (23, 30). This reinforces agalsidase beta's suitability for long-term use, particularly in adherent populations.
Beyond treatment-related considerations, this study also highlights important implications for family screening. The identification of affected family members in both cases (mother and daughter in Case 1; brother and daughter in Case 2) underscores the critical importance of cascade family screening following the diagnosis of a proband. This practice is essential for early diagnosis and timely institution of therapy in presymptomatic individuals, which can fundamentally alter the disease course (31, 32).
Conclusion
This case series describes two Chinese adult male Fabry disease patients with proteinuria who received agalsidase beta for over three years. Both patients demonstrated stabilization of renal and cardiac function, improvement in systemic symptoms, and good tolerability. Proteinuria management required concomitant RAAS inhibition, particularly in patients with residual kidney function. Early initiation of agalsidase beta before irreversible organ injury remains key to optimizing prognosis. These cases also highlight the importance of family cascade screening for early diagnosis and intervention.
Limitation
This study has several limitations. First, it is limited to two adult male patients with a retrospective design and no control group. Second, anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were not measured, limiting evaluation of immunogenicity. Third, post-transplant renal biopsy was not performed to assess Gb3 deposition in the graft. Finally, the 3–4 year follow-up duration cannot rule out potential long-term progressive organ deterioration, particularly for cardiac and cerebrovascular outcomes. Multicenter prospective studies are warranted.
In summary, Case 1 displayed more typical and severe clinical features, including left lower abdominal pain, blurred vision, tinnitus, elevated skin temperature, and pain, symptoms that were absent in Case 2. Even when similar symptoms appeared in both, they were more pronounced in Case 1. Renal injury in Case 1 progressed to failure, and although ERT slowed this decline, it could not reverse the damage. Two years ago, the disease had advanced to CKD stage 5 with concurrent hypertension, necessitating kidney transplantation. In comparison, Case 2 was at CKD stage 2, and ERT resulted in improved proteinuria. Additionally, Case 1 had more extensive angiokeratomas and a higher frequency of diarrhea.
Acknowledgments
We thank the patients and their families for their cooperation. We also acknowledge the clinical teams at The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University for their support.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was supported by the Undergraduate Teaching Quality and Teaching Reform Cultivation Project of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Grant No. P12220011-230125); and the Research Project on Undergraduate Teaching Reform of Clinical Teaching Bases in Guangdong Province, issued by the Education Department of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2025JD024).
Footnotes
Edited by: Michal Nowicki, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
Reviewed by: Gaetano Santulli, City University of New York, United States
Andrea Matucci, AOU Careggi Florence Italy
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
ZH: Methodology, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. YW: Data curation, Writing – original draft. HY: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. YL: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. LX: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Correction Note
This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the scientific content of the article.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1.Li X, Ren X, Zhang Y, Ding L, Huo M, Li Q. Fabry disease: mechanism and therapeutics strategies. Front Pharmacol. (2022) 13:1025740. 10.3389/fphar.2022.1025740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chan B, Adam DN. A review of fabry disease. Skin Therapy Lett. (2018) 23(2):4–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Michaud M, Mauhin W, Belmatoug N, Bedreddine N, Garnotel R, Catros F, et al. Fabry disease: a review. La Revue de Medecine Interne. (2021) 42(2):110–9. 10.1016/j.revmed.2020.08.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Germain DP, Altarescu G, Barriales-Villa R, Mignani R, Pawlaczyk K, Pieruzzi F, et al. An expert consensus on practical clinical recommendations and guidance for patients with classic fabry disease. Mol Genet Metab. (2022) 137(1–2):49–61. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2022.07.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nikolaenko V, Warnock DG, Mills K, Heywood WE. Elucidating the toxic effect and disease mechanisms associated with lyso-Gb3 in fabry disease. Hum Mol Genet. (2023) 32(15):2464–72. 10.1093/hmg/ddad073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.van der Veen SJ, Hollak CEM, van Kuilenburg ABP, Langeveld M. Developments in the treatment of fabry disease. J Inherit Metab Dis. (2020) 43(5):908–21. 10.1002/jimd.12228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schiffmann R, Hughes DA, Linthorst GE, Ortiz A, Svarstad E, Warnock DG, et al. Screening, diagnosis, and management of patients with fabry disease: conclusions from a “kidney disease: improving global outcomes” (KDIGO) controversies conference. Kidney Int. (2017) 91(2):284–93. 10.1016/j.kint.2016.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ren H, Zhang W, Ouyang Y, Guo J, Xu H, Ma J, et al. A phase 4, open-label, multicenter study of the safety and efficacy of agalsidase beta in Chinese patients with fabry disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis. (2025) 20(1):401. 10.1186/s13023-025-03950-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Turkmen K, Baloglu I. Fabry disease: where are we now? Int Urol Nephrol. (2020) 52(11):2113–22. 10.1007/s11255-020-02546-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Svarstad E, Marti HP. The changing landscape of fabry disease. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: CJASN. (2020) 15(4):569–76. 10.2215/CJN.09480819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ortiz A, Germain DP, Desnick RJ, Politei J, Mauer M, Burlina A, et al. Fabry disease revisited: management and treatment recommendations for adult patients. Mol Genet Metab. (2018) 123(4):416–27. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.02.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cainelli F, Argandykov D, Kaldarbekov D, Mukarov M, Tran Thi Phuong L, Germain DP, et al. Case report: first two identified cases of fabry disease in Central Asia. Front Genet. (2021) 12:657824. 10.3389/fgene.2021.657824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Burand AJJ, Stucky CL. Fabry disease pain: patient and preclinical parallels. Pain. (2021) 162(5):1305–21. 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Michaud M, Mauhin W, Belmatoug N, Garnotel R, Bedreddine N, Catros F, et al. When and how to diagnose fabry disease in clinical pratice. Am J Med Sci. (2020) 360(6):641–9. 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Adzhubei I, Jordan DM, Sunyaev SR. Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2. Current Protocols in Human Genetics. (2013) 7:t7–20. 10.1002/0471142905.hg0720s76 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pan X, Ouyang Y, Wang Z, Ren H, Shen P, Wang W, et al. Genotype: a crucial but not unique factor affecting the clinical phenotypes in fabry disease. PLoS One. (2016) 11(8):e161330. 10.1371/journal.pone.0161330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Giammanco A, Gagliardo CM, Scrimali C, Brucato F, Fasciana TMG, Averna M, et al. Clinical and biochemical characterization of fabry disease associated GLA gene variants: data from a large cohort of 469 thousand genotyped subjects of the UK biobank database. J Inherit Metab Dis. (2025) 48(6):e70103. 10.1002/jimd.70103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Beck M, Ramaswami U, Hernberg-Ståhl E, Hughes DA, Kampmann C, Mehta AB, et al. Twenty years of the fabry outcome survey (FOS): insights, achievements, and lessons learned from a global patient registry. Orphanet J Rare Dis. (2022) 17(1):238. 10.1186/s13023-022-02392-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Parini R, Pintos-Morell G, Hennermann JB, Hsu TR, Karabul N, Kalampoki V, et al. Analysis of renal and cardiac outcomes in male participants in the fabry outcome survey starting agalsidase alfa enzyme replacement therapy before and after 18 years of age. Drug Des Devel Ther. (2020) 14:2149–58. 10.2147/DDDT.S249433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hung C, Wu Y, Kuo L, Sung KT, Lin HH, Chang WT, et al. 2024 Update of the TSOC expert consensus of fabry disease. Acta Cardiologica Sinica. (2024) 40(5):544–68. 10.6515/ACS.202409_40(5).20240731A [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Arends M, Biegstraaten M, Hughes DA, Mehta A, Elliott PM, Oder D, et al. Retrospective study of long-term outcomes of enzyme replacement therapy in fabry disease: analysis of prognostic factors. PLoS One. (2017) 12(8):e182379. 10.1371/journal.pone.0182379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Germain DP, Charrow J, Desnick RJ, Guffon N, Kempf J, Lachmann RH, et al. Ten-year outcome of enzyme replacement therapy with agalsidase beta in patients with fabry disease. J Med Genet. (2015) 52(5):353–8. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee CS, Tsurumi M, Eto Y. Safety and tolerability of agalsidase beta infusions shorter than 90?Min in patients with fabry disease: post-hoc analysis of a Japanese post-marketing study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. (2023) 18(1):209. 10.1186/s13023-023-02803-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Germain DP, Elliott PM, Falissard B, Fomin VV, Hilz MJ, Jovanovic A, et al. The effect of enzyme replacement therapy on clinical outcomes in male patients with fabry disease: a systematic literature review by a European panel of experts. Mol Genet Metab Rep. (2019) 19:100454. 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2019.100454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fledelius HC, Sandfeld L, Rasmussen SK, Madsen CV, Feldt-Rasmussen U. Ophthalmic experience over 10 years in an observational nationwide Danish cohort of fabry patients with access to enzyme replacement. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). (2015) 93(3):258–64. 10.1111/aos.12588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lee C, Lin S, Niu D, Lin HY. Fabry disease and the effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) improvement: a review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Sci. (2022) 19(1):126–31. 10.7150/ijms.66448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pande S, Varzideh F, Gambardella J, Jankauskas SS, Cerasuolo FA, Spinelli L, et al. Fabry disease cardiomyopathy: a state-of-the-art review. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. (2025) 92:43–65. 10.1016/j.pcad.2025.08.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Capelli I, Aiello V, Gasperoni L, Comai G, Corradetti V, Ravaioli M, et al. Kidney transplant in fabry disease: a revision of the literature. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). (2020) 56(6):284. 10.3390/medicina56060284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yu B, Atta MG, Brennan DC, Kant S. Outcomes and management of kidney transplant recipients with fabry disease: a review. J Nephrol. (2024) 37(3):561–71. 10.1007/s40620-023-01853-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wallace EL, Goker-Alpan O, Wilcox WR, Holida M, Bernat J, Longo N. Head-to-head trial of pegunigalsidase alfa versus agalsidase beta in patients with Fabry disease and deteriorating renal function: results from the 2-year randomised phase III BALANCE study[J]. J Med Genet. (2024) 61(6):520–30. 10.1136/jmg-2023-109445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Laney DA, Bennett RL, Clarke V, Fox A, Hopkin RJ, Johnson J, et al. Fabry disease practice guidelines: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors. J Genet Couns. (2013) 22(5):555–64. 10.1007/s10897-013-9613-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Germain DP, Moiseev S, Suárez-Obando F, Al Ismaili F, Al Khawaja H, Altarescu G, et al. The benefits and challenges of family genetic testing in rare genetic diseases-lessons from fabry disease. Mol Genet Genomic Med. (2021) 9(5):e1666. 10.1002/mgg3.1666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bazan-Socha SA, Miszalski-Jamka T, Petkow-Dimitrow P, Krzemińska-Wojtulek M, Kałużna M, Gawlik A, et al. Clinical stability of fabry disease in 54 months’ enzyme replacement therapy–follow-up of the first Polish study. Pol Arch Med Wewn. (2007) 117(5-6):260–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Taneda S, Honda K, Nakajima I, Huchinoue S, Oda H. Renal transplantation between siblings with unrecognized fabry disease. Transplant Proc. (2013) 45(1):115–8. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.10.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sheng B, Yim KF, Lau LK, Lee HCH, Fung KSS, Ma KFJ, et al. Two related Chinese fabry disease patients with a p.N215S pathological variant who presented with nephropathy. Mol Genet Metab Rep. (2020) 24:100596. 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2020.100596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tang ASO, Wong QY, Pao Lin Ting I, Selvesten P, Yeo ST, Chew LP, et al. First 2 fabry cases with novel mutation and their associated clusters in Malaysia. Am J Case Rep. (2021) 22:e932923. 10.12659/AJCR.932923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kume S, Yasuda-Yamahara M, Imamura-Uehara Y, Kuwagata S, Yamahara K, Takeda N, et al. Improvement in decline rate of estimated glomerular filtration rate after febuxostat treatment in a fabry disease patient with enzyme replacement therapy-resistant proteinuria. Internal Medicine (Tokyo, Japan). (2022) 61(20):3077–81. 10.2169/internalmedicine.8993-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.




