Abstract
Background
Veterinary professionals encounter myriad stressors that challenge their wellbeing and mental health. Positive psychology provides an evidence‐based approach to improving mental health by emphasising individual strengths, effective coping mechanisms, and the promotion of overall wellbeing. The specific objectives of this narrative review were to: (1) provide an overview of positive psychology concepts applicable to the veterinary profession, (2) synthesise the growing body of literature on positive psychology concepts researched within the veterinary context while also providing insights from other healthcare professions, and (3) inform the integration of positive psychology concepts in education and/or daily veterinary practice of veterinarians.
Method
This narrative review was conducted by examining peer‐reviewed literature on positive psychology relevant to the veterinary profession.
Results
The review highlights the promising potential of positive psychology for veterinary professionals. For example, meaningful experiences such as helping clients and patients can foster veterinarian job satisfaction and mental wellbeing. Emotional intelligence, empathy, and compassion can enhance professional interactions and counteract negative mental health outcomes. Furthermore, practices such as mindfulness and flow have the potential to foster focus and emotional regulation, whereas self‐esteem, self‐efficacy and self‐confidence contribute to a sense of competence and self‐worth.
Limitations
This review did not follow a systematic method for selecting and examining literature, and only includes peer‐reviewed literature published in English.
Conclusion
The evidence from this review provides encouraging possibilities to strengthen positive psychology skills applicable to veterinary professionals, bearing in mind that incorporating strategies for organisational wellbeing is equally important to promote a healthier and more sustainable veterinary field.
Keywords: flourishing, happiness, PERMA, positive affect, thriving
INTRODUCTION
Veterinarians experience significant mental health and wellbeing challenges worldwide, reflecting the complex demands inherent to the profession. Specifically, compared to the general population, veterinary professionals are more likely to experience negative emotions 1 , 2 and have higher levels of serious mental health concerns such as burnout, depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation. 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 Similarly, many other studies have demonstrated that veterinary occupational stress levels are linked to poor psychological health and low wellbeing, 1 , 3 , 7 which can ultimately contribute to veterinarians deciding to leave their career. 8
A variety of occupational stressors have been linked to the high prevalence of mental health outcomes in veterinary care. For example, chronic stress and burnout are likely caused by a combination of workplace stressors (e.g., extended hours and high caseloads) and emotional pressures such as patient euthanasia, client grief and animal suffering. 8 , 9 , 10 Other risk factors that have been associated with poor mental health include clients’ expectations and financial limitations, ethical dilemmas and moral distress. 11 , 12 , 13
To address the mental health challenges within the veterinary profession, numerous studies have discussed positive psychology components as essential principles for veterinarians, and the focus has been shifted to resilience building, coping skills and wellbeing solutions. 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 While the ideas underlying positive psychology have deeper historical origins, Seligman played a key role in formally defining and advancing the field as a distinct area of psychological study. 19 Seligman and Csikszentmihalyi believed that the study of disorder and dysfunction, which was the primary focus of psychology following World War II, ignored aspects of the human experience that contribute to happiness and thriving. 20
The focus of positive psychology is on what makes life worthwhile: how people can cultivate positive individual and collective characteristics, be happy in the moment, be satisfied with the past and have hope for the future. 20 , 21 Positive psychology presupposes that mental wellbeing interventions can benefit healthy people as well and that the tenets of positive psychology do not apply exclusively to those with mental illnesses. 20 , 22
Thus, measuring and promoting human flourishing through aspects such as increasing positive affect, resilience and coping is the cornerstone of positive psychology. 23 , 24 According to Diener et al., 25 ‘flourishing’ describes a state of psychosocial wellbeing that arises when fundamental psychosocial needs such as connection with others, a sense of respect, self‐worth, competence and life purpose are fulfilled. Flourishing, central to positive psychology, is also relevant in the context of veterinary medicine as it encompasses wellbeing, resilience, job satisfaction and professional fulfillment—critical factors in addressing the challenges faced by practicing veterinary professionals and veterinary students. 17 , 21
Wellbeing encompasses flourishing in several areas of life, such as physical health and all the pillars described by Seligman 26 in a model known as PERMA: (1) positive emotion—opinions and feelings are the sole subjective means of evaluating positive emotions; (2) engagement—when people are in a state of flow, which is characterised by deep engagement, peak performance and a heightened sense of control, attention and satisfaction, they are said to be engaged; (3) relationships—the existence of close friends, family or social ties; (4) meaning—contributing to and being a part of something greater than oneself; and (5) achievement—striving towards and accomplishing goals, along with maintaining the motivation to engage in and complete tasks. Seligman contends that ‘wellbeing is the central focus of positive psychology’ and ‘flourishing is the gold standard for assessing wellbeing’. 26 Given the recent increased attention to positive psychology in the veterinary field, 14 , 27 , 28 the aim of this narrative review was to synthesise the literature on the concepts of positive psychology and their application within veterinary medicine. Therefore, the specific objectives of this review were to: (1) provide an overview of positive psychology concepts applicable to the veterinary profession, (2) synthesise the growing body of literature on positive psychology concepts researched within the veterinary context while also providing insights from other healthcare professions, and (3) inform the integration of positive psychology concepts in education and/or daily veterinary practice of veterinarians. Within each of the following sections, various positive psychology terms and concepts will be first described broadly, followed by specific examples or applications relevant to the veterinary profession.
HEDONIA AND EUDAIMONIA
According to Deci and Ryan, 29 there are two general perspectives of wellbeing: hedonic and eudemonic. Hedonia is the pursuit of the experience of positive affect, such as pleasure and happiness, while eudaimonia is the search for fulfillment, meaning and purpose. While eudaimonia is about using and developing one's greatest qualities and contributing to the greater good, hedonia is primarily concerned with short‐term comfort and pleasure. 30 Hedonic pleasure, according to Berridge and Kringelbach, 31 encompasses many higher forms of pleasure (e.g., cognitive, social, artistic and moral) in addition to sensory pleasures.
The distinction between hedonic and eudaimonic approaches has deep philosophical roots, dating back at least two millennia. 32 Huta and Ryan 33 compared these two types of pursuits and found that they are related to some distinct and some overlapping sets of wellbeing outcomes. For example, in their study, hedonia and eudaimonia were related to positive emotions and wellbeing but the effects of hedonia on positive affect faded in the short term (by the 3‐month follow‐up) while eudaimonia was related to positive affect in the long run (at 3‐month follow‐up). This distinction highlights that hedonia provides quick emotional benefits but may lack lasting impact, while eudaimonia offers long‐term wellbeing, although its benefits may take time to emerge.
Kashdan et al. 34 posit that hedonia and eudaimonia overlap conceptually and statistically and may operate together rather than in isolation. Specifically, they noted that positive affect, a component of hedonic wellbeing, is positively correlated with meaning in life, a component of eudaimonic wellbeing. This strong correlation suggests that individuals who experience pleasure and positive emotions also tend to find meaning and purpose in their lives, highlighting the intertwined nature of these constructs. Similarly, Fredrickson's 35 broaden‐and‐build theory of positive emotions states that positive emotions contribute to building a person's personal resources over time such as competence, meaning (purpose in life), optimism, resilience, self‐acceptance, positive relationships and physical health. As such, even a brief period of feeling happy can start an ‘upward spiral’ that improves wellbeing over the long run. 36
While research has shown that compared to non‐caregiving professions, veterinarians encounter higher levels of negative emotions at work, 1 veterinarian wellbeing is also strongly correlated with the gratifying nature of the veterinary profession. 16 Generally, hedonic pleasure and other positive emotions have been demonstrated to provide significant effects in the workplace such as decreased risk of burnout 37 and career success. 38 Furthermore, in other professions, positive emotions have been linked to a host of advantages, including enhanced immunity, 39 enhanced resistance to adversity, recovery from stress 40 , 41 and even longer life. 42 A veterinary model of work‐derived wellbeing was proposed by Cake et al., 43 emphasising that a career in veterinary medicine can be a rich source of fulfillment and satisfaction, positioning veterinarian wellbeing within the context of eudaimonia. This perspective is further supported by a qualitative study that highlighted numerous benefits of working in the veterinary profession, such as forming strong bonds with animals and their owners and the rewarding experience of helping them. 44 The connection with humans and animals was also highlighted as a key contributor to the sense of meaningful work in Canadian veterinarians, alongside the ability to make a difference in the lives of patients, clients and the broader community, and the opportunity for creativity and problem‐solving. 45 Furthermore, Clise et al. 44 highlighted a connection between job satisfaction and self‐beliefs, particularly self‐efficacy and adaptability, qualities that contribute to veterinarians' resilience and overall wellbeing. The job demands–resources model 46 provides a framework for understanding how workplace conditions influence wellbeing in veterinary practice. Job resources such as supportive colleagues and management, adequate support staff, reasonable appointment scheduling and clear organisational policies can foster a sense of control, competence and purpose. Conversely, high job demands—including long hours, heavy workloads and the emotional strain of client interactions and animal care—can deplete energy and contribute to burnout. When veterinarians have sufficient organisational and personal job resources, they are better able to manage these demands, engage meaningfully with their work, and maintain job satisfaction and mental wellbeing.
To operationalise and empirically assess the veterinary model of work‐derived wellbeing proposed by Cake et al., 43 Wallace 16 explored how job qualities relate to eudaimonia. Besides providing further evidence that factors such as helping clients and animals contribute to a sense of meaningful work, the research also emphasised the importance of feeling a sense of belonging in the profession to meaning and wellbeing. Eudaimonia is intrinsically tied to the concept of flourishing as it emphasises the realisation of one's full potential and living in alignment with one's values and purpose. 47
RESILIENCE AND COPING
While hedonia and eudaimonia provide a foundation for understanding wellbeing, the ability to sustain wellbeing in the face of challenges is equally important. In the demanding field of veterinary medicine, where stress, emotional labour and ethical dilemmas are common, resilience and effective coping strategies become essential for maintaining both personal and professional fulfillment. Resilience is a key predictor of psychological wellbeing in both the general population and among medical professionals. 48 The American Psychological Association defines resilience as ‘the ability to effectively adapt and cope when confronted with challenges such as adversity, trauma, tragedy, threats or major stressors’. 49 Resilience is a dynamic process that helps a person overcome adversity and obstacles in their life. 50 Over time, experiences, the acquisition of useful skills and tacit knowledge all contribute to the development of resilience. 51 While resilience is a valuable coping mechanism, scholars caution that emphasising this concept should not detract from the need to address the structural and systemic factors contributing to adversity; advocating resilience must go hand in hand with acknowledging and responding to the realities of adverse circumstances. 52 , 53
Over the past few decades, as veterinary education has moved towards a competency‐based approach, multiple frameworks have emerged to outline the essential professional competencies expected of graduate veterinarians. For example, the competency of ‘attends to wellbeing of self and others’ is included in the Competency Framework of the American Association of Veterinary Medical Colleges 54 (p. 45). The Day One Competencies of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons 55 (p. 5) emphasises that ‘veterinary surgeons must possess resilience and confidence in their professional judgements to effectively handle the pressures and competing demands they are likely to encounter in the workplace’. These competencies indicate that it is a veterinarian's responsibility to maintain balance and continue to prosper despite adversity.
Despite the limited research, there are indications that veterinarians may not be particularly resilient. 56 , 57 For instance, a study conducted among Canadian veterinarians found that 75% of participants had lower average resilience scores compared to the general population norm, 56 whereas a survey of veterinarians in Australia showed that only 6% of veterinary students met the criteria of high resilience, while about one‐third were identified as having low resilience levels. 18 Another study 58 highlighted that resilience may not significantly change as veterinarians progress in their career based on the three career‐stage groups that took part in the study (new graduate veterinarians and mid‐ and late‐career veterinarians). Additional research has explored the factors that likely contribute to resilience in veterinary students and practitioners, highlighting the importance of both personal resources such as self‐efficacy, self‐compassion, drawing from past experiences, changing perspectives and mindfulness, as well as contextual resources such as social support 18 , 59 in fostering adaptability and psychological wellbeing.
In a sample of Canadian veterinarians, demographic, career and lifestyle factors have been reported to be associated with resilience. 5 Specifically, overall health, and the level of satisfaction with support from friends and workplace resources had positive associations with resilience and/or perceived stress, while anxiety, depression, burnout, secondary traumatic stress and the presence of mental illness were negatively associated with resilience. Furthermore, McArthur et al. 58 investigated the coping methods of veterinarians and found that resilience was positively correlated with emotion‐focused coping methods (e.g., efforts to lessen the emotional impact of a stressful situation), while being negatively correlated with dysfunctional and problem‐focused coping strategies (e.g., planning, seeking out advice and assistance from others, and trying to improve the situation by actively seeking solutions, all of which depend on eliminating or minimising the stressor in order to succeed).
Understanding the factors that contribute to resilience can help in designing effective interventions. To shed light on the importance of strengthening resilience, Moffett and Bartram 59 conducted mixed‐methods research to explore how a mental wellbeing teaching intervention affected the self‐reported resilience of first‐year veterinary students in the UK. According to the study, veterinary students who receive the right kind of training in resilience‐building techniques may become more resilient in both their personal and professional lives and become more conscious of resilience. According to this study, veterinary students believed that resilience training was a useful addition to the curriculum and that having resilience is probably crucial to having a successful career in veterinary medicine. 59 Also in the veterinary student context, Taylor et al. 60 developed a career development programme to help prepare and empower undergraduates in Australia. The programme covered six key areas: business, communication, consultation, leadership, mental health and ethics. The results indicated that implementation of the programme helped students to use protective factors that are internal to an individual, such as self‐reliance, self‐esteem and self‐efficacy, which fostered resilience.
EMPATHY AND COMPASSION
For veterinary professionals, the benefits and challenges of their work arise from connecting with and understanding the experiences of both clients and patients. 43 , 61 , 62 , 63 Empathy includes emotional aspects such as recognising someone else's feelings and responding emotionally, as well as cognitive aspects such as understanding their perspective and managing one's own emotions. 43 , 64 , 65 Compassion involves recognising pain and suffering in others and wanting to relieve it. 62
Emotional and cognitive engagement in veterinary care can lead to both positive and negative outcomes. Compassion satisfaction refers to the fulfillment and joy gained from supporting others through hardship, trauma or crisis, and is often identified as a key reason why many people choose to enter the veterinary profession. 62 , 66 Compassion satisfaction arises when individuals recognise that their work reflects their personal values and holds both personal and professional significance. 67 Furthermore, while provider–client–patient interactions may be emotionally demanding, often veterinary professionals find these interactions highly meaningful and derive great satisfaction from caring for and helping animal patients and their caretakers. 62 The negative implication of caring deeply has been commonly referred to as compassion fatigue. However, Klimecki and Singer 68 challenge the term ‘compassion fatigue’, suggesting that it is not compassion but empathy that leads to caregiver exhaustion. They term this phenomenon empathic distress (or empathetic distress), emphasising the emotional strain of absorbing others' suffering rather than engaging in compassionate action.
However, in human and veterinary health care professions, empathy is recognised as a crucial element of the therapeutic relationship, as it supports better communication, aids in diagnosis, and increases client satisfaction. 69 , 70 , 71 In addition to the already complex nature of empathy and compassion in the veterinary context, research has highlighted significant associations between gender and empathy levels towards animals. 72 For example, Colombo et al. 73 revealed that female veterinarians in Italy scored higher on empathy levels towards animals compared to male veterinarians. Furthermore, Menor‐Campos et al. 74 found that female students, from three European veterinary medicine schools, show greater concern than male students regarding animal use.
There appears to be a change in empathy throughout medical training. Several studies have shown that levels of empathy are lowest in veterinary and medical students in the later years of their studies. 75 , 76 This decrease in empathy has been hypothesised to be related to compassion fatigue (empathic stress), lack of resources and a feeling of resignation regarding some of the negative outcomes for the animals they treat. 77 , 78 , 79 This decline is concerning, as decreased empathy has been associated with increased odds of self‐perceived medical errors, which can further directly affect patient care. 80 During veterinary education, empathy can be nurtured by promoting a respectful and encouraging educational atmosphere, integrating ethics and animal welfare into the curriculum, and offering meaningful experiences that allow students to engage closely and compassionately with animals. 72
EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE
A broad spectrum of inter‐ and intrapersonal skills is essential for health professionals to deliver both competent and compassionate care. 81 Emotional intelligence, which builds on empathy and compassion, helps veterinarians to not only recognise emotions in others and themselves but also handle emotionally challenging situations. As such, emotional intelligence has the potential to serve as a mitigating factor to empathic distress. Salovey and Mayer 82 (p. 189) defined emotional intelligence as ‘a specific aspect of social intelligence, referring to the ability to recognise and understand one's own emotions as well as those of others, to distinguish between different emotions, and to use this awareness to guide thoughts and behavior’.
The contribution of emotional intelligence to the effectiveness of medical professionals is of particular interest because of the unique doctor–patient/client and medical team relationships, as it enables healthcare professionals to navigate complex emotional dynamics, foster trust and communicate effectively, which are essential for improving patient outcomes and collaboration within teams. 83 , 84 , 85 Emotional intelligence contributes to the quality of veterinary health care and improves team performance by supporting better communication, more effective conflict resolution, and timely detection and management of stress and burnout. 86 Specifically, veterinarians with higher emotional intelligence were able to elicit improved client satisfaction and client adherence with treatment plans. 86
Besides benefiting patients and clients, high emotional intelligence also has the potential to benefit veterinary professionals’ mental wellbeing. For example, higher emotional intelligence was associated with both lowered stress levels and improved academic performance in medical students. 87 , 88 Similarly, a cross‐sectional study conducted by Wells et al. 89 with veterinary medical students in the United States revealed a statistically significant, negative correlation between emotional intelligence levels and stress, anxiety and depression. Importantly, some aspects of perceiving and managing emotions appear to be modifiable, 90 and researchers have suggested that these much‐needed attributes should be explicitly taught and inculcated within the curriculum 91 while others suggested to also consider the emotional intelligence levels of veterinary student candidates. 89 The need for targeted training was confirmed by Adin et al. 92 who showed that emotional intelligence scores of fourth‐year veterinary students, interns and residents in a teaching hospital in the United States were mostly below the mean for other professionals at all stages of training. Similarly, emotional intelligence scores did not change significantly in a longitudinal study following veterinarians from the time of graduation through their first year of clinical practice. 93 These results suggest that standard didactic and clinical training programmes and specific interventions may be required to increase emotional intelligence among veterinary health professionals.
MINDFULNESS
Mindfulness is increasingly being discussed within the veterinary profession. 94 A widely cited definition of mindfulness is ‘the state of awareness that arises by intentionally focusing on the present moment with openness and without judgement through paying attention on purpose, in the present moment, and non‐judgementally to the unfolding experience moment by moment’. 95 Cultivating mindfulness can enhance focus and resilience, allowing practitioners to manage stress and maintain emotional balance in demanding situations. 96 , 97 , 98 Mindfulness has been shown to have positive impacts on reducing psychological problems of individuals 99 , 100 decreasing burnout and increasing compassion satisfaction, 101 , 102 and supporting quality of professional life. 103 For example, McArthur et al. 18 reported a positive correlation between mindfulness characteristics and resilience in the veterinary student population.
The small amount of research on mindfulness and the use of mindfulness practices in the veterinary industry primarily involves veterinary students. Findings indicate that regular engagement in mindfulness practices may be associated with lower levels of depression and anxiety 104 , 105 and that a mindful breathing exercise may temporarily decrease stress. 106 Mind‒body practices such as mindfulness are considered effective for alleviating stress and enhancing wellbeing due to their non‐invasive nature and emphasis on overall wellness. 107 Indeed, Moir and Van den Brink 4 and Rohlf 108 emphasised the need for more research into strategies that support the wellbeing of veterinary professionals. Given the potential benefits of mindfulness observed in veterinary students, this highlights the need for further research on mindfulness‐based interventions within the veterinary profession.
FLOW
Csikszentmihalyi 109 described flow as a state of mind or internal experience that arises when a person is fully engaged in an enjoyable activity, becoming so absorbed that all other distractions fade away. Csikszentmihalyi 110 assumed that the repeated experience of flow in a given context not only increases intrinsic task interest but also has a cumulative effect on positive mood over time through feelings of engagement, satisfaction and joy. As a result, engaging in such activities—whether a job, hobby or sport—can significantly enhance overall positive mood. 111 However, the Job Demands–Resources theory 46 states that positive results from work engagement only occur when job resources surpass job demands. If not counterbalanced by sufficient resources such as autonomy and social support, high job demands, including emotional labour, moral quandaries and long working hours can compromise wellbeing in healthcare settings. 112 Therefore, to experience flow, individuals must experience their work as positive, while work that is overly demanding or inconsistent with personal beliefs will hinder flow and worsen stress and burnout.
When individuals engage in challenging and meaningful tasks that align with their skills and personal values, they are more likely to experience flow, leading to enhanced self‐worth, personal growth, and a sense of mastery of skills and meaning in life. 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 The concept of flow has been explored only sparingly in the veterinary medicine literature 14 , 43 as per our knowledge, but flow experiences have been explored within medical practice, where they are linked to improved focus, satisfaction and reduced burnout among practitioners. 117 , 118 , 119 Cake et al. 43 discussed flow as a key component of engagement in veterinary work, highlighting that experiences of flow—arising from a balance between high challenge and high skill—are linked to eudaimonic wellbeing rather than short‐term pleasure. Furthermore, Corrigan et al. 14 emphasised that the ‘engagement’ element of the PERMA model is linked to flow, highlighting the importance of designing learning experiences in veterinary education that balance challenge and skill to foster deeper engagement and wellbeing. Research on flow highlights the importance of engagement in hobbies and leisure activities as a means of experiencing deep focus and enjoyment. 109 , 120 , 121 Exploring how veterinarians engage in such activities—whether through creative pursuits, sports or social interactions—could provide valuable insights into how flow states outside of work contribute to the overall wellbeing of this profession.
SELF‐ESTEEM, SELF‐EFFICACY AND SELF‐CONFIDENCE
Rosenberg 122 explained that self‐esteem is a person's overall favourable view of themselves, with high self‐esteem involving self‐respect and a belief in one's own worth. Furthermore, Vealey 123 defined self‐confidence as an individual's certainty about their abilities while Bandura et al. 124 defined self‐efficacy as an individual's confidence in their capability to successfully and effectively perform a particular task. These three concepts are intertwined and the terms and definitions of self‐confidence and self‐efficacy, 125 , 126 and self‐confidence and self‐esteem 127 , 128 have been used interchangeably. However, some authors believe that self‐esteem includes self‐confidence, 129 , 130 viewing self‐confidence as a narrower construct than self‐esteem. 131 Others simply purport that self‐esteem is associated with, or contributes to, a sense of confidence. 132 , 133 , 134
Given the interpersonal and challenging nature of veterinary work, understanding how veterinarians develop and maintain self‐esteem could provide insight into wellbeing and professional fulfillment. According to Leary, 135 self‐esteem is not just an internal judgement of worth but fluctuates based on how accepted or valued an individual feels in their social environment. Veterinarians are generally perceived as more approachable, sensitive and understanding than human physicians, 136 and this positive public perception may enhance veterinary professionals’ self‐concept and self‐esteem, contributing to their overall mental health and wellbeing.
In the veterinary student population, a study conducted in New Zealand showed that students with higher self‐esteem reported better wellbeing and lower stress levels. 137 Similarly, higher self‐efficacy was positively associated with higher resilience in Australian veterinarians. 58 Where low self‐esteem may reflect an accurate awareness of one's limitations, it could also lead to a distorted sense of insecurity and inadequacy. 138 Similarly, a qualitative study of early‐career veterinarians highlighted how veterinary school and the transition into clinical practice contributed to feelings of inadequacy and an erosion of self‐confidence, and how this erosion negatively affected mental wellbeing. 45 However, having a mentor during the first year(s) of clinical veterinary practice fostered confidence and was described as an important determinant of success in clinical practice. 139
LIMITATIONS OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY APPROACHES AT THE INDIVIDUAL LEVEL
Persistent stressors and demanding workplace conditions have become deeply ingrained in the culture of veterinary medicine, creating a perception that such challenges are an inherent and unchangeable part of the profession. 140 This normalisation of mental health struggles contributes to the ongoing difficulty in addressing and improving wellbeing within the field. 141 While veterinary professionals are often encouraged to work towards enhancing individual‐level factors that have the potential to reduce negative mental health outcomes and foster flourishing, the work‐related context of the veterinary clinical profession cannot be ignored. Building on Seligman's PERMA model, the PERMA +4 model takes a step further by addressing additional dimensions relevant to work‐related contexts. 142 This extension includes components related to the physical work environment, physical health, mindset and economic security, 142 and calls for intentionally improving the efficiency of the work environment and cultivating a supportive culture through good leadership that empowers clinicians and promotes holistic mental health. 143 For example, positive leadership significantly impacts workplace wellbeing and organisational commitment within veterinary settings. 14 As such, an individual's resilience should not be seen as a substitute for addressing underlying issues inherent to the veterinary profession, as individuals thrive best when personal efforts are supported by structural change. 144 , 145 , 146 Similarly, Ungar and Theron 147 suggested that resilience is not an internal resource, but one's ability to access the resources needed for wellbeing. It is, therefore, crucial to provide veterinary professionals with an environment that allows for flourishing and the necessary resources to overcome challenges.
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Awareness of the principles and applications of positive psychology and their impact on mental wellbeing highlights wide‐ranging implications for the profession's practices and current and future generations of veterinarians. This review emphasised how positive psychology can address challenges to mental health and wellbeing in veterinary medicine, while recognising that some stressors are inherent to the profession. The positive psychology strategies discussed in this review largely fall within the category of primary interventions, as they focus on prevention and the proactive cultivation of wellbeing before significant distress arises. At the same time, several concepts—such as mindfulness, resilience training and compassion‐focused approaches—can also function as secondary interventions by mitigating stress responses and supporting early recovery from adversity. In some cases, especially when addressing chronic occupational stress or burnout, these same strategies may serve as tertiary supports that complement rehabilitative or therapeutic efforts. Future research could more explicitly distinguish and evaluate the effectiveness of positive psychology interventions across these three levels of prevention. Overall, these concepts offer tools to navigate unavoidable stressors, mitigating their impact and fostering a healthier outlook. Furthermore, valuable insights can be drawn from the growing body of literature in other healthcare professions, where these concepts have been explored more extensively. These cross‐disciplinary findings provide meaningful guidance and highlight the potential benefits of applying positive psychology principles within the veterinary context.
In considering the application of the PERMA model 26 to veterinary mental health, it is evident that components such as positive emotion (e.g., through hedonia), engagement (e.g., through flow experience), relationships (e.g., through compassion and empathy), meaning and achievement (e.g., through eudaimonia) have been explored to some extent in recent years in the veterinary context, while some studies also addressed work‐related contexts and the environment that allow for, or hinder, flourishing. It is crucial to acknowledge the powerful role of institutional and organisational structures on wellbeing. Enhancing veterinarian wellbeing is most effectively achieved not by placing the sole responsibility on individual veterinarians to cultivate resilience, but by fostering resilience within veterinary schools and practice environments. This involves prioritising workforce wellbeing, regularly assessing mental health and stress within organisations, and sharing accountability for these outcomes among leadership roles.
The findings of this review indicate that there are ample opportunities to deepen our understanding of positive psychology in the veterinary context, including further exploration of potential cultural and gender differences. Furthermore, to date, much of the research has been conducted with veterinary students, and while this is undoubtedly an important avenue, conditions in clinical practice are very different and warrant further study. Similarly, an important additional component is to include members of the veterinary team (e.g., veterinary technicians) in future research. Furthermore, much of the existing literature relies on cross‐sectional studies, surveys and qualitative analyses rather than longitudinal assessments or experimental designs with control groups. Strengthening the evidence base through diverse and methodologically robust quantitative and qualitative studies will help inform best practices for integrating positive psychology into veterinary training and practice.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Conceptualisation of the manuscript, writing of initial draft, and editing based on co‐authors’ feedback: Aiman Khattak. Conceptualisation of the manuscript, reviewing and editing of the manuscript, and providing supervision for Aiman Khattak: Philip Smith and Caroline Ritter. Reviewing and editing of the manuscript: Andria Jones, April L. McGrath and Kathryn L. Proudfoot.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
ETHICS STATEMENT
Ethics approval was not required as this review synthesised previously published literature.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
REFERENCES
- 1. Fritschi L, Morrison D, Shirangi A, Day L. Psychological wellbeing of Australian veterinarians. Aust Vet J. 2009;87(3):76–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Moses L. Another experience in resolving veterinary ethical dilemmas: observations from a veterinarian performing ethics consultation. Am J Bioeth. 2018;18(2):67–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hatch PH, Winefield HR, Christie BA, Lievaart JJ. Workplace stress, mental health, and burnout of veterinarians in Australia. Aust Vet J. 2011;89(11):460–468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Moir FM, Van den Brink A. Current insights in veterinarians’ psychological wellbeing. N Z Vet J. 2020;68(1):3–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Perret JL, Best CO, Coe JB, Greer AL, Khosa DK, Jones‐Bitton A. Prevalence of mental health outcomes among Canadian veterinarians. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2020;256(3):365–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Jones‐Fairnie H, Ferroni P, Silburn S, Lawrence D. Suicide in Australian veterinarians. Aust Vet J. 2008;86(4):249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Nett RJ, Witte TK, Holzbauer SM, Elchos BL, Campagnolo ER, Musgrave KJ, et al. Risk factors for suicide, attitudes toward mental illness, and practice‐related stressors among US veterinarians. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2015;247(8):945–955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hilton K, Burke K, Signal T. Mental health in the veterinary profession: an individual or organisational focus? Aust Vet J. 2022;101(1–2):41–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Moir F, Van den Brink A. Current insights in veterinarians’ psychological wellbeing. N Z Vet J. 2020;68(1):3–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Spendelow J, Cripwell C, Stott R, Francis K, Powell J, Cavanagh K, et al. Workplace stressor factors, profiles and the relationship to career stage in UK veterinarians, veterinary nurses and students. Vet Med Sci. 2024;10(4):e1547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Moses L, Malowney MJ, Boyd JW. Ethical conflict and moral distress in veterinary practice: a survey of North American veterinarians. J Vet Intern Med. 2018;32(6):2115–2122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Persson K, Selter F, Neitzke G, Kunzmann P. Philosophy of a “good death” in small animals and consequences for euthanasia in animal law and veterinary practice. Animals. 2020;10(1):124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Neubauer V, Dale R, Probst T, Pieh C, Janowitz K, Brühl D, et al. Prevalence of mental health symptoms in Austrian veterinarians and examination of influencing factors. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):13274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Corrigan VK, Newman RL, Richmond P, Strand EB, Vaisman JM. The future of flourishing in veterinary medicine: a systems‐informed positive psychology approach in veterinary education. Front Vet Sci. 2025;11:1484412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Peixoto MM, Cunha O. Life satisfaction, psychological distress, compassion satisfaction and resilience: when the pleasure of helping others protects veterinary staff from emotional suffering. Vet Res Commun. 2024;48(5):3489–3498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Wallace JE. Meaningful work and well‐being: a study of the positive side of veterinary work. Vet Rec. 2019;185(18):571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Cake MA, McArthur MM, Matthew SM, Mansfield CF. Finding the balance: uncovering resilience in the veterinary literature. J Vet Med Educ. 2017;44(1):95–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. McArthur M, Mansfield C, Matthew S, Zaki S, Brand C, Andrews J, et al. Resilience in veterinary students and the predictive role of mindfulness and self‐compassion. J Vet Med Educ. 2017;44(1):106–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Seligman ME. Positive Psychology: A Personal History. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol.. 2018;15(1):1–23, 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Seligman MEP, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: an introduction. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):5–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Linley PA, Joseph S, Harrington S, Wood AM. Positive psychology: past, present, and (possible) future. J Posit Psychol. 2005;1(1):3–16. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Gable SL, Haidt J. What (and why) is positive psychology? Rev Gen Psychol. 2005;9(2):103–110. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Hefferon K. Positive psychology and the body: the somatopsychic side to flourishing. McGraw‐Hill Education, UK; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ciarrochi J, Hayes SC, Oades LG, Hofmann SG. Toward a unified framework for positive psychology interventions: evidence‐based processes of change in coaching, prevention, and training. Front Psychol. 2022;12:809362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Diener E, Wirtz D, Tov W, Kim‐Prieto C, Choi DW, Oishi S, et al. New wellbeing measures: short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Soc Indic Res. 2010;97:143–156. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Seligman ME. Flourish: a visionary new understanding of happiness and wellbeing. Simon and Schuster; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Woodward L. Mental wellbeing and positive psychology for veterinary professionals: a pre‐emptive, proactive and solution‐based approach. John Wiley & Sons; 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Fry CA, Mossman L. Is it time for a positive psychology revolution in veterinary workplaces? 2021.
- 29. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Hedonia, eudaimonia, and wellbeing: an introduction. J Happiness Stud. 2008;9:1–11. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Chen H, Zeng Z. Seeking pleasure is good, but avoiding pain is bad: distinguishing hedonic approach from hedonic avoidance orientations. J Happiness Stud. 2023;24(7):2377–2393. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Berridge KC, Kringelbach ML. Building a neuroscience of pleasure and wellbeing. Psychol Well Theory Res Pract. 2011;1(1):3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. McKeon R, editor. The basic works of Aristotle. Modern Library; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Huta V, Ryan RM. Pursuing pleasure or virtue: the differential and overlapping wellbeing benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. J Happiness Stud. 2010;11:735–762. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Kashdan TB, Biswas‐Diener R, King LA. Reconsidering happiness: the costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. J Posit Psychol. 2008;3(4):219–233. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Fredrickson BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden‐and‐build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol. 2001;56(3):218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Fredrickson BL, Joiner T. Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional wellbeing. Psychol Sci. 2002;13(2):172–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Lyubomirsky S, Layous K. How do simple positive activities increase wellbeing? Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2013;22(1):57–62. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Walsh LC, Boehm JK, Lyubomirsky S. Does happiness promote career success? Revisiting the evidence. J Career Assess. 2018;26(2):199–219. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Marsland AL, Pressman S, Cohen S. Positive affect and immune function. Psychoneuroimmunology. 2007;2:761–779. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Fredrickson BL, Tugade MM, Waugh CE, Larkin GR. What good are positive emotions in crisis? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84(2):365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Pressman SD, Jenkins BN, Moskowitz JT. Positive affect and health: what do we know and where next should we go? Annu Rev Psychol. 2019;70(1):627–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Danner DD, Snowdon DA, Friesen WV. Positive emotions in early life and longevity: findings from the nun study. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;80(5):804. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Cake MA, Bell MA, Bickley N, Bartram DJ. The life of meaning: a model of the positive contributions to wellbeing from veterinary work. J Vet Med Educ. 2015;42(3):184–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Clise MH, Matthew SM, McArthur ML. Sources of pleasure in veterinary work: a qualitative study. Vet Rec. 2021;188(11):e54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Morabito E, Jones A, Kittisiam T, Cake M, Ritter C. “This is my why.” Exploring the concept of meaningful work in early‐career veterinarians across Canada. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1595949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands‒resources model: state of the art. J Manag Psychol. 2007;22(3):309–328. [Google Scholar]
- 47. Ryff CD, Singer BH. Know thyself and become what you are: a eudaimonic approach to psychological wellbeing. J Happiness Stud. 2008;9:13–39. [Google Scholar]
- 48. Jackson D, Firtko A, Edenborough M. Personal resilience as a strategy for surviving and thriving in the face of workplace adversity: a literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2007;60(1):1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. American Psychological Association . The road to resilience. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, Tooley E, Christopher P, Bernard J. The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15:194–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Resnick B. Resilience in older adults. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2014;30(3):155–163. [Google Scholar]
- 52. Voronka J. Storytelling beyond the psychiatric gaze: resisting resilience and recovery narratives. Can J Disabil Stud. 2019;8(4):8–30. [Google Scholar]
- 53. Suslovic B, Lett E. Resilience is an adverse event: a critical discussion of resilience theory in health services research and public health. Community Health Equity Res Policy. 2023;44(3):339–343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Group ACBVENW, Cravens C, Epp T, Banach J, Brown C, Jackson M, et al. Competency‐based veterinary education—nursing (CBVE‐N) model. Washington, DC: American Association of Veterinary Medical Colleges; 2025. [Google Scholar]
- 55. Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons . Essential competences required of the veterinary surgeon: essential competences required of the new veterinary graduate: “Day One Skills” [Internet]. Available from: https://www.rcvs.org.uk/document‐library/day‐one‐skills/DayOneSkills.pdf
- 56. Best CO, Perret JL, Hewson J, Khosa DK, Conlon PD, Jones‐Bitton A. A survey of veterinarian mental health and resilience in Ontario, Canada. Can Vet J. 2020;61(2):166. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Matthew SM, Carbonneau KJ, Mansfield CF, Zaki S, Cake MA, McArthur ML. Development and validation of a contextualised measure of resilience in veterinary practice: the Veterinary Resilience Scale—Personal Resources (VRS‐PR). Vet Rec. 2020;186(15):489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. McArthur ML, Learey TJ, Jarden A, Gelderen I, Hazel SJ, Cake MA, et al. Resilience of veterinarians at different career stages: the role of self‐efficacy, coping strategies and personal resources for resilience in veterinary practice. Vet Rec. 2021;189(12):e771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Moffett JE, Bartram DJ. Veterinary students’ perspectives on resilience and resilience‐building strategies. J Vet Med Educ. 2017;44(1):116–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Taylor DB, Johns KM, Reilly ML, Hedlefs RM. A career development program: building resilience in veterinary undergraduates. Aust J Career Dev. 2022;31(1):26–41. [Google Scholar]
- 61. Black AF, Winefield HR, Chur‐Hansen A. Occupational stress in veterinary nurses: roles of the work environment and own companion animal. Anthrozoös. 2011;24(2):191–202. [Google Scholar]
- 62. Figley C, Roop R. Compassion fatigue in the animal‐care community. eBooks [Internet]. 2006. Available from: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/ebooks/5 [Google Scholar]
- 63. Bennett P, Rohlf V. Perpetration‐induced traumatic stress in persons who euthanize nonhuman animals in surgeries, animal shelters, and laboratories. Soc Anim. 2005;13(3):201–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Cuff BMP, Brown SJ, Taylor L, Howat DJ. Empathy: a review of the concept. Emot Rev. 2016;8(2):144–153. [Google Scholar]
- 65. Wagaman MA, Geiger JM, Shockley C, Segal EA. The role of empathy in burnout, compassion satisfaction, and secondary traumatic stress among social workers. Soc Work. 2015;60(3):201–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Cohen SP. Compassion fatigue and the veterinary health team. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2007;37(1):123–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Olson SA. The future of veterinary caregiving: finding our way forward with wisdom and compassion. N Z Vet J. 2022;70(6):301–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Klimecki O, Singer T. Empathic distress fatigue rather than compassion fatigue? Integrating findings from empathy research in psychology and social neuroscience. In: Oakley B, Knafo A, Madhavan G, Wilson DS, editors. Pathological altruism [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2011. [cited 2025 Nov 12]. [Google Scholar]
- 69. Halpern J. Practicing medicine in the real world: challenges to empathy and respect for patients. J Clin Ethics. 2003;14:298–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Mercer SW, Reynolds WJ. Empathy and quality of care. Br J Gen Pr. 2002;52(Suppl):9–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. McArthur ML, Fitzgerald J. Companion animal veterinarians’ use of clinical communication skills. Aust Vet J. 2013;91(9):374–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Romero MH, Escobar L, Sánchez JA. Empathy levels among veterinary medicine students in Colombia. J Vet Med Educ. 2022;49(6):740–747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Colombo ES, Crippa F, Calderari T, Prato‐Previde E. Empathy toward animals and people: the role of gender and length of service in a sample of Italian veterinarians. J Vet Behav. 2017;17:32–37. [Google Scholar]
- 74. Menor‐Campos DJ, Knight S, Sánchez‐Muñoz C, López‐Rodríguez R. Human‐directed empathy and attitudes toward animal use: a survey of Spanish veterinary students. Anthrozoös. 2019;32(4):471–487. [Google Scholar]
- 75. Hazel SJ, Signal TD, Taylor N. Can teaching veterinary and animal‐science students about animal welfare affect their attitude toward animals and human‐related empathy? J Vet Med Educ. 2011;38(1):74–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Colombo ES, Pelosi A, Prato‐Previde E. Empathy towards animals and belief in animal‒human‒continuity in Italian veterinary students. Anim Welf. 2016;25(2):275–286. [Google Scholar]
- 77. Woloschuk W, Harasym PH, Temple W. Attitude change during medical school: a cohort study. Med Educ. 2004;38(5):522–534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Thomas MR, Dyrbye LN, Huntington JL, Lawson KL, Novotny PJ, Sloan JA, et al. How do distress and wellbeing relate to medical student empathy? A multicenter study. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(2):177–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Hojat M, Vergare MJ, Maxwell K, Brainard G, Herrine SK, Isenberg GA. The devil is in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school. Acad Med. 2009;84(9):1182–1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Schoenfeld‐Tacher RM, Shaw JR, Meyer‐Parsons B, Kogan LR. Changes in affective and cognitive empathy among veterinary practitioners. J Vet Med Educ. 2017;44(1):63–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Arora S, Ashrafian H, Davis R, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Sevdalis N. Emotional intelligence in medicine: a systematic review through the context of the ACGME competencies. Med Educ. 2010;44(8):749–764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Salovey P, Mayer JD. Emotional intelligence. Imagin Cogn Personal. 1990;9(3):185–211. [Google Scholar]
- 83. Weng H, Hung C, Liu Y, Cheng Y, Yen C, Chang C, et al. Associations between emotional intelligence and doctor burnout, job satisfaction and patient satisfaction. Med Educ. 2011;45(8):835–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Emanuel EJ, Gudbranson E. Importance of intelligence and emotional intelligence for physicians—reply. J Am Med Assoc. 2018;320(2):205–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Al‐Hamdan ZM, Alyahia M, Al‐Maaitah R, Alhamdan M, Faouri I, Al‐Smadi AM, et al. The relationship between emotional intelligence and nurse–nurse collaboration. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2021;53(5):615–622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Timmins RP. How does emotional intelligence fit into the paradigm of veterinary medical education? J Vet Med Educ. 2006;33(1):71–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Gupta R, Singh N, Kumar R. Longitudinal predictive validity of emotional intelligence on first year medical students perceived stress. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17:1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Wijekoon CN, Amaratunge H, Silva Y, Senanayake S, Jayawardane P, Senarath U. Emotional intelligence and academic performance of medical undergraduates: a cross‐sectional study in a selected university in Sri Lanka. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Wells J, Watson K, Davis RE, Quadri SSA, Mann JR, Verma A, et al. Associations among stress, anxiety, depression, and emotional intelligence among veterinary medicine students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(8):3934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Johnson DR. Emotional intelligence as a crucial component to medical education. Int J Med Educ. 2015;6:179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Lewis S, McNulty J, White P, Lane S, Mackay S. Emotional intelligence development in radiography curricula: results of an international longitudinal study. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2017;48(3):282–287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Adin DB, Royal KD, Adin CA. Cross‐sectional assessment of the emotional intelligence of fourth‐year veterinary students and veterinary house officers in a teaching hospital. J Vet Med Educ. 2020;47(2):193–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Kittisiam T, Ritter C, Morabito E, Stacey A, Khosa D, Jones A. A multitude of emotions in veterinary work: a mixed‐methods analysis of emotional intelligence and experiences in early‐career veterinarians [Oral presentation]. 17th International Symposium on Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics. ISVEE, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 2024. [Google Scholar]
- 94. Pontin EE, Hanna J, Senior A. Piloting a mindfulness‐based intervention to veterinary students: learning and recommendations. J Vet Med Educ. 2020;47(3):327–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Kabat‐Zinn J. Mindfulness‐based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2003;10:144–156. [Google Scholar]
- 96. Burton A, Burgess C, Dean S, Koutsopoulou GZ, Hugh‐Jones S. How effective are mindfulness‐based interventions for reducing stress among healthcare professionals? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Stress Health. 2017;33(1):3–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Chiappetta M, D'Egidio V, Sestili C, Cocchiara RA, La Torre G. Stress management interventions among healthcare workers using mindfulness: a systematic review. Senses Sci. 2018;5(2):517–549. [Google Scholar]
- 98. Chmielewski J, Łoś K, Łuczyński W. Mindfulness in healthcare professionals and medical education. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020;34(1):1–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Dehghan M, Namjoo Z, Mohammadi Akbarabadi F, Fooladi Z, Zakeri MA. The relationship between anxiety, stress, spiritual health, and mindfulness among patients undergoing hemodialysis: a survey during the COVID‐19 outbreak in Southeast Iran. Health Sci Rep. 2021;4(4):e461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Malakoutikhah A, Zakeri MA, Derakhtanjani AS, Dehghan M. Anxiety, anger, and mindfulness as predictors of general health in the general population during COVID‐19 outbreak: a survey in southeast Iran. J Community Psychol. 2022;50(2):916–927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Taylor NZ, Millear PMR. The contribution of mindfulness to predicting burnout in the workplace. Personal Individ Differ. 2016;89:123–128. [Google Scholar]
- 102. Ducar DM, Penberthy JK, Schorling JB, Leavell VA, Calland JF. Mindfulness for healthcare providers fosters professional quality of life and mindful attention among emergency medical technicians. Explore. 2020;16(1):61–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Mou H, Chen X, Sun Y, Yan T, Li J, Li J. The impact of mindfulness on nurses’ professional quality of life. Chin J Pract Nurs. 2016;36:206–210. [Google Scholar]
- 104. Correia HM, Smith AD, Murray S, Polak LS, Williams B, Cake MA. The impact of a brief embedded mindfulness‐based program for veterinary students. J Vet Med Educ. 2017;44(1):125–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Sweet DM, Gentile D, He L. Communication apprehension and willingness to communicate in veterinary medicine students: implications for mindfulness and communication training. Health Commun. 2023;38(1):41–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Stevens BS, Royal KD, Ferris K, Taylor A, Snyder AM. Effect of a mindfulness exercise on stress in veterinary students performing surgery. Vet Surg. 2019;48(3):360–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. McKenzie SP, Hassed CS, Gear JL. Medical and psychology students’ knowledge of and attitudes towards mindfulness as a clinical intervention. Explore. 2012;8(6):360–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Rohlf VI. Interventions for occupational stress and compassion fatigue in animal care professionals—a systematic review. Traumatology. 2018;24(3):186‒192. [Google Scholar]
- 109. Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 110. Csikszentmihalyi M. If we are so rich, why aren't we happy? Am Psychol. 1999;54(10):821‒827. [Google Scholar]
- 111. Csikszentmihalyi M, Rathunde K. The measurement of flow in everyday life: toward a theory of emergent motivation. In: Jacobs JE, editor. Nebraska symposium on motivation: developmental perspectives on motivation. University of Nebraska Press; 1993. p. 57–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Sanz‐Vergel A. Job demands–resources theory: ten years later. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2023;10:25–53. [Google Scholar]
- 113. Fave AD, Bassi M. Esperienza di flow e sviluppo della complessità nel comportamento umano. Inf Psicol Psicoter Psichiatr. 1998;32–33:32‒47. [Google Scholar]
- 114. Luthans F. The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. J Organ Behav Int J Ind Occup Organ Psychol Behav. 2002;23(6):695–706. [Google Scholar]
- 115. Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB. Positive organizational behavior: engaged employees in flourishing organizations. J Organ Behav Int J Ind Occup Organ Psychol Behav. 2008;29(2):147–154. [Google Scholar]
- 116. Waterman AS, Schwartz SJ, Goldbacher E, Green H, Miller C, Philip S. Predicting the subjective experience of intrinsic motivation: the roles of self‐determination, the balance of challenges and skills, and self‐realization values. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003;29(11):1447–1458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Aust F, Beneke T, Peifer C, Wekenborg M. The relationship between flow experience and burnout symptoms: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(7):3865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Zito M, Emanuel F, Bertola L, Russo V, Colombo L. Passion and flow at work for the reduction of exhaustion at work in nursing staff. Sage Open. 2022;12(2):21582440221095009. [Google Scholar]
- 119. Shreffler J, Huecker M. Physician flow at work: examining work absorption, clinical flow, work fulfillment, and flow thieves. Workplace Health Saf. 2022;70(11):484–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Mangialavori S, Bassi M, Fave AD. Finding flow in pandemic times: leisure opportunities for optimal experience and positive mental health among Italian university students. J Leis Res. 2024;55(5):662–685. [Google Scholar]
- 121. Bum C, Yang J, Choi C. Leisure benefits, flow experience, and life satisfaction comparison between players of actual and virtual golf. Soc Behav Personal Int J. 2022;50(5):1–12. [Google Scholar]
- 122. Rosenberg M. Rosenberg self‐esteem scale (RSE). Acceptance and commitment therapy. Meas Package. 1965;61(52):18. [Google Scholar]
- 123. Vealey RS. Conceptualization of sport‐confidence and competitive orientation: preliminary investigation and instrument development. J Sport Psychol. 1986;8(3):221–246. [Google Scholar]
- 124. Bandura A, Freeman WH, Lightsey R. Self‐efficacy: the exercise of control. J Cogn Psychother. 1999;13(2):158–166. [Google Scholar]
- 125. Hollenbeck GP, Hall DT. Self‐confidence and leader performance. Organ Dyn. 2004;33(3):254–269. [Google Scholar]
- 126. Smith HM, Betz NE. Development and validation of a scale of perceived social self‐efficacy. J Career Assess. 2000;8(3):283–301. [Google Scholar]
- 127. Bénabou R, Tirole J. Self‐confidence and personal motivation. Q J Econ. 2002;117(3):871–915. [Google Scholar]
- 128. Chemers MM, Hu LT, Garcia BF. Academic self‐efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. J Educ Psychol. 2001;93(1):55‒64. [Google Scholar]
- 129. Schooler C, Oates G. Self‐esteem and work across the life course. Extending self‐esteem theory and research: sociological and psychological currents. Cambridge University Press; 2001. p. 177–197. [Google Scholar]
- 130. Owens TJ. Accentuate the positive and the negative: rethinking the use of self‐esteem, self‐deprecation, and self‐confidence. Soc Psychol Q. 1993;56:288–299. [Google Scholar]
- 131. Blascovich J, Tomaka J, Robinson JP, Shaver PR, Wrightsman LS. Measures of self‐esteem. Meas Personal Soc Psychol Attitudes. 1991;1(2):115–160. [Google Scholar]
- 132. Baumeister RF, Campbell JD, Krueger JI, Vohs KD. Does high self‐esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2003;4(1):1–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Leary MR, Tambor ES, Terdal SK, Downs DL. Self‐esteem as an interpersonal monitor: the sociometer hypothesis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;68(3):518–530. [Google Scholar]
- 134. Shipman AS, Mumford MD. When confidence is detrimental: influence of overconfidence on leadership effectiveness. Leadersh Q. 2011;22(4):649–665. [Google Scholar]
- 135. Leary MR. Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value: getting to the root of self‐esteem. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2005;16(1):75–111. [Google Scholar]
- 136. Kedrowicz AA, Royal KD. A comparison of public perceptions of physicians and veterinarians in the United States. Vet Sci. 2020;7(2):50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Gardner DH, Parkinson TJ. Optimism, self‐esteem, and social support as mediators of the relationships among workload, stress, and wellbeing in veterinary students. J Vet Med Educ. 2011;38(1):60–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Ghezelbash S, Rahmani F, Peyrovi H, Inanloo M, Shekarchian S. Comparison of self‐esteem among first to fourth year nursing students from Universities of Medical Sciences in Tehran. Thrita. 2015;4(1):e24336. [Google Scholar]
- 139. Morabito E, Jones A, Kittisiam T, Pelko Oreden C, Stacey A, Ritter C. “Wow, I get it now.” Early‐career veterinarians' perspectives on their educational experiences and perceived impacts on wellbeing. JVME. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Steffey MA, Griffon DJ, Risselada M, Buote NJ, Scharf VF, Zamprogno H, et al. A narrative review of the physiology and health effects of burnout associated with veterinarian‐pertinent occupational stressors. Front Vet Sci. 2023;10:1184525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Connolly CE, Norris K, Dawkins S, Martin A. Barriers to mental health help‐seeking in veterinary professionals working in Australia and New Zealand: a preliminary cross‐sectional analysis. Front Vet Sci. 2022;9:1051571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Donaldson SI, Zyl LE, Donaldson SI. PERMA+ 4: a framework for work‐related wellbeing, performance and positive organizational psychology 2.0. Front Psychol. 2022;12:817244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Sinsky CA, Biddison LD, Mallick A, Dopp AL, Perlo J, Lynn L, et al. Organizational evidence‐based and promising practices for improving clinician wellbeing. NAM Perspect. 2020;2020:10.31478/202011a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Mahdiani H, Ungar M. The dark side of resilience. Advers Resil Sci. 2021;2(3):147–155. [Google Scholar]
- 145. Schwarz S. Resilience in psychology: a critical analysis of the concept. Theory Psychol. 2018;28(4):528–541. [Google Scholar]
- 146. Ungar M. Systemic resilience: principles and processes for a science of change in contexts of adversity. Ecol Soc. 2018;23(4):34. [Google Scholar]
- 147. Ungar M, Theron L. Resilience and mental health: how multisystemic processes contribute to positive outcomes. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(5):441–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
