Skip to main content
International Journal of Women's Health logoLink to International Journal of Women's Health
. 2026 Jun 29;18:608250. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S608250

Previous Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis in Pregnancy: Clinical Challenges and Outcomes – A Case Report

Alodia Ardianti Kurnia 1,✉, Hartanto Bayuaji 1, Lisda Amalia 2, Zulvayanti Zulvayanti 1
PMCID: PMC13330757  PMID: 42403514

Abstract

Background

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a rare vascular disorder caused by partial or complete occlusion of the dural venous sinuses. It accounts for approximately 0.5–3% of all cerebrovascular occlusive diseases and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence is higher in women of reproductive age, particularly during pregnancy and among users of hormonal contraception. Prothrombotic factors such as pregnancy and hormonal contraceptive use contribute substantially to disease occurrence.

Case Illustration

A reproductive-aged woman (G4P2A1) with a two-year history of CVST presented with worsening headache at 37 weeks of gestation. The patient had a prior diagnosis of CVST and continued exposure to hormonal contraceptives despite the diagnosis. She had a history of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injections prescribed by healthcare providers and combined injectable contraception used on her own initiative after being diagnosed with CVST. During pregnancy, anticoagulation management was suboptimal because warfarin therapy was continued until pregnancy was recognized and subsequently discontinued by the patient. Delivery was performed via cesarean section due to worsening headache. Postpartum symptoms were controlled with medical therapy and both maternal and neonatal outcomes were favorable.

Conclusion

Special consideration is required when administering antithrombotic therapy during pregnancy and delivery. This case highlights the importance of appropriate contraceptive counseling in women with a history of CVST and the need for pregnancy-safe anticoagulation strategies to minimize thrombotic complications and optimize maternal and fetal outcomes. Management of CVST in pregnancy should involve a multidisciplinary team to determine the safest mode of delivery and optimize maternal and fetal outcomes.

Keywords: cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, pregnancy, hormonal contraception

Introduction

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a vascular disorder characterized by partial or complete occlusion of the dural venous sinuses.1 It is a rare condition, with an estimated incidence of 3–5 cases per 1 million population annually. Despite its rarity, women are three times more likely than men to develop CVST. Majority of cases occur in individuals younger than 55 years old, approximately 80% of cases occur in women of reproductive age.2,3

CVST is closely associated with reproductive health. Gender-specific risk factors include obesity, pregnancy, puerperium, menopause, oral contraceptive use, and hormone replacement therapy. These risk factors increase risk of thrombosis, especially in women.4 Hormonal contraception has been identified as an important risk factor for CVST. Estrogen increases von Willebrand factor activation, elevates coagulation factors, and reduces anticoagulant factors, thereby promoting a prothrombotic state. Medroxyprogesterone acetate increases thrombotic risk through regulation of thrombin receptor expression. These prothrombotic mechanisms may exacerbate CVST.5

Pregnancy further contributes to thrombotic risk through physiological hypercoagulability, characterized by increased concentrations of coagulation factors, reduced fibrinolytic activity, venous stasis, and hemodynamic adaptations. In women with a previous history of CVST, these pregnancy-related changes may complicate clinical management, particularly in the presence of additional risk factors such as hormonal contraceptive exposure. Therefore, comprehensive risk assessment, appropriate contraceptive counseling, and individualized anticoagulation or thromboprophylaxis strategies are essential in this population.

This case describes pregnancy in a woman with a previous history of CVST, continued hormonal contraceptive exposure, and challenges in anticoagulation management. It highlights important clinical considerations regarding contraceptive selection after CVST, pregnancy-safe anticoagulation strategies, and multidisciplinary management to optimize maternal and fetal outcomes.

Case Illustration

A 29-year-old woman (G4P2A1) at 37 weeks of gestation with a BMI of 26.6 kg/m2 (overweight) presented with worsening headache one day prior to admission. She had previously delivered two healthy infants vaginally in 2017 and 2022, each weighing approximately 3300 g, before being diagnosed with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). She had one miscarriage requiring curettage four months before the current pregnancy. She denied experiencing labor pain or bloody show.

The patient was diagnosed with CVST approximately four years before the current pregnancy after experiencing persistent headaches for more than six months. Brain MRI and Magnetic Resonance Venography (MRV) demonstrated narrowing of the right transverse to sigmoid sinus consistent with CVST, accompanied by anatomical sinus hypoplasia (Figure 1). She had no history of smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, thrombophilia, or cardiac arrhythmia. Further thrombophilia evaluation, including Protein C, Protein S, Antithrombin III, Factor V Leiden mutation, antiphospholipid antibodies, and lupus anticoagulant testing, was not performed. Since the diagnosis, she had been treated with pregabalin, amitriptyline, and warfarin.

Figure 1.

Grayscale angiography micrograph of brain vessels on dark background, white arrow at lower left.

Magnetic resonance venography (MRV) demonstrating narrowing of the right transverse to sigmoid sinus (ARROW), consistent with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, with associated anatomical sinus hypoplasia.

Regarding contraceptive history, the patient had used three-monthly injectable contraception containing depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) since 2020, administered by a midwife. She continued hormonal contraception and subsequently used monthly combined injectable contraception containing DMPA and estradiol cypionate following curettage for miscarriage. Hormonal contraception was continued for approximately two years after the diagnosis of CVST. During this period, the patient occasionally experienced headaches.

The patient recognized her pregnancy during the first trimester, she discontinued warfarin without consulting her physician due to fear of teratogenic effects. However, she continued neurology follow-up without informing her neurologist of the pregnancy until approximately 24 weeks of gestation. During neurological evaluation, her D-dimer level was elevated at 1.03 µg/mL. Warfarin was then replaced with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (80 mg/day).

The patient subsequently consulted a maternal–fetal medicine specialist. Ultrasound examination showed a fetus consistent with 33 weeks of gestation, with an estimated fetal weight of 1849 grams, no structural abnormalities, and normal Doppler findings in the middle cerebral, umbilical, and uterine arteries. Acetylsalicylic acid was subsequently discontinued by the neurologist in preparation for delivery, and vaginal delivery was initially recommended.

At 37 weeks of gestation, the patient presented with worsening headache. Her blood pressure was 113/77 mmHg, pulse rate was 105 beats per minute, and respiratory rate was 20 breaths per minute. On abdominal examination, the fundal height measured 31 cm and the fetal heart rate was 136–140 beats per minute. Vaginal examination revealed no cervical dilatation. No focal neurological deficits were documented on clinical examination. Because of worsening headache, delivery was performed by cesarean section. Cesarean delivery was performed under spinal anesthesia. A male infant was delivered weighing 3320 grams, with a length of 51 cm, and Apgar scores of 7 at one minute and 8 at five minutes. The patient opted for sterilization as her contraceptive method.

The patient’s postpartum condition was stable Acetylsalicylic acid was resumed on the third postoperative day after consultation with the neurologist. The patient subsequently attended regular follow-up visits with the neurology and obstetrics–gynecology departments. Her headache symptoms improved and were well controlled with medical therapy. A summary of the patient’s clinical course is presented in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A flowchart timeline of CVST course and antithrombotic management from 2020 to postpartum. A left-to-right flowchart timeline with labeled boxes connected along a baseline with dot markers. Top labels show contraception phases: “DMPA Injectable Contraception” followed by “DMPA plus Estradiol Injectable Contraception”. Timeline boxes, left to right: 2020: “Delivery of 2nd child”. 2022: “Diagnosed with CVST”. Early 2024: “Miscarriage at 10 weeks of pregnancy”. Late 2024 (First Trimester): “Recognized current pregnancy”; “Self-discontinued warfarin”; “Continued neurology follow-up without disclosing pregnancy”. 24 Weeks of Gestation: “Pregnancy disclosed to neurologist consultation”; “D-dimer: 1.03 microgram per milliliter (elevated)”. 33 Weeks of Gestation: “Maternal-fetal medicine consultation”; “Estimated fetal weight: 1,849 g”; “Acetylsalicylic acid discontinued in preparation for delivery”. 37 Weeks of Gestation: “Presented with worsening headache”; “No focal neurological deficits”; “Cesarean delivery due to worsening headache”; “Spinal anesthesia”; “Male infant delivered (3,320 g)”. Postpartum Period: “Postpartum condition remained stable”; “Acetylsalicylic acid resumed on postoperative day 3”; “Headache symptoms improved”. Medication boxes along the baseline, left to right: “Warfarin 2 mg once daily; Pregabalin 75 mg twice daily; Amitriptyline 25 mg once daily; Codeine once daily”. The same medication list repeats under early 2024. A box states “No antithrombotic therapy”. A box states “Acetylsalicylic acid 80 mg once daily”. A final box states “Acetylsalicylic acid 80 mg once daily (resumed on postoperative day 3)”.

Disease progression and antithrombotic management timeline illustrating contraceptive exposure, CVST diagnosis, pregnancy course, treatment modifications, delivery, and postpartum follow-up.

Discussion

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis is an obstruction of the dural venous sinuses of the brain. This condition disrupts venous drainage, leading to increased intracranial pressure, venous infarction, and intracranial hemorrhage. The disease was first described by the British scientist John Abercrombie in 1828. A postmortem examination of a woman with a history of seizures two weeks after childbirth revealed thrombosis in the cerebral sinuses and veins.6

The incidence of CVST is rare in the United States and Europe, with an annual incidence of only 0.5–1 cases per 10,000,000 people. In young adults, CVST is much more common in women than in men, with a ratio of approximately 3:1. This trend is generally associated with gender-specific risk factors, particularly prothrombotic conditions in women, such as obesity, pregnancy, the postpartum period, and menopause. The use of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy is also associated with the incidence of CVST. Oral contraceptives are the second most common cause of CVST.4,7

The diagnosis of CVST remains challenging because patients may present with a wide spectrum of nonspecific manifestations, including headache, focal neurological deficits, seizures, visual disturbances, and decreased levels of consciousness. As these symptoms overlap with numerous neurological and obstetric conditions, clinical diagnosis alone is often difficult. Consequently, neuroimaging plays a pivotal role in establishing the diagnosis and guiding management. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with magnetic resonance venography (MRV) is currently considered the imaging modality of choice for evaluating CVST. Dynamic time-resolved angiographic techniques, particularly Time-Resolved Imaging of Contrast Kinetics (TRICKS), provide rapid sequential acquisition of contrast flow through the cerebral venous system, allowing detailed assessment of venous hemodynamics while maintaining excellent spatial resolution. Compared with more invasive techniques such as catheter angiography, TRICKS offers a noninvasive method to identify the location and extent of thrombus, evaluate patent venous drainage pathways, assess temporal evolution of thrombosis, and detect associated parenchymal abnormalities. In addition, susceptibility-weighted imaging has demonstrated high diagnostic value for detecting venous thrombi and may further improve diagnostic accuracy.8

Estrogen has prothrombotic effects by increasing levels of von Willebrand factor and coagulation factors II, VII, VIII, and X, while decreasing fibrinolytic activity. Medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) is a progestin commonly used in injectable contraception, has also been associated with increased thrombosis risk through regulation of thrombin receptor expression (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.8–7.1).9

Pregnancy further increases the risk of thrombosis due to physiological hypercoagulability, including increased coagulation factors (V, VII, VIII, IX, X, XII), increased fibrinogen levels, and reduced anticoagulant activity. Hemodynamic changes and increased plasma volume during pregnancy may also contribute to venous stasis. These mechanisms correspond to Virchow’s triad: blood stasis, endothelial changes, and alterations in blood composition.10,11

In this case, the patient had a history of using 3-month injectable contraceptives, consisting of medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) for 2 years before, during, and up to 2 years after being diagnosed with CVST. A case-control study in Sweden reported that DMPA use increases the risk of acute venous thrombosis by 2.2 times (95% CI 1.3–4.0).12 The patients also used combination injectable consisting of DMPA and estradiol cypionate, which will worsen the patient’s thrombosis. Several systematic reviews show an increased risk of venous thrombosis due to the use of combined hormonal contraceptives by 5.59 (95% CI 3.95–7.91) and 7.59 (95% CI 3.82–15.09) times.5,13

According to WHO medical eligibility criteria, progestin injectable contraception in patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease falls into category 3, while combined hormonal contraception is classified as category 4. The use of these contraceptives in this patient reflects limited awareness among healthcare workers and patients regarding thromboembolic risks associated with hormonal contraception. Previous studies have shown that although hormonal contraception is widely used among women of reproductive age, 59.3% of healthcare workers have limited knowledge about thromboembolic risks, and only 25.1% of contraceptive users are aware of these risks.14 Inadequate post-miscarriage counseling and insufficient patient education may also contribute to inappropriate contraceptive use.15,16

The management of acute CVST involves the administration of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) followed by long-term vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin. However, warfarin is contraindicated in pregnancy because of its teratogenic effects, including skeletal abnormalities and nasal hypoplasia. In pregnant women, anticoagulation therapy should be continued with LMWH until the postpartum period. In this case, the patient did not inform the neurologist about her pregnancy until six months of gestation, leading to the prescription of warfarin.17 The patient subsequently discontinued warfarin due to concerns about bleeding and instead took acetylsalicylic acid starting at six months of pregnancy, resulting in suboptimal CVST management.

Once the pregnancy was disclosed to the neurologist at approximately six months of gestation, warfarin was formally discontinued and replaced with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid. Current guidelines recommend LMWH as the preferred anticoagulant during pregnancy because it does not cross the placenta and has a well-established safety profile for both mother and fetus.18 Therefore, the use of acetylsalicylic acid in this case should be interpreted as an individualized clinical decision due to coverage policy of Indonesia’s National Health Insurance rather than a guideline-recommended treatment strategy for CVST during pregnancy. This circumstance highlights the challenges that may arise when pregnancy is not recognized or communicated promptly to the treating physician.

Headache is the most common symptom of CVST and results from obstruction of the cerebral venous system and increased intracranial pressure. Venous obstruction may impair cerebrospinal fluid absorption at the arachnoid granulations, causing further elevation of intracranial pressure, which can lead to decreased consciousness and visual disturbances. The patient presented with worsening headache near term. However, repeat neuroimaging was not performed during pregnancy; therefore, it could not be determined whether the symptoms reflected progression of CVST, increased intracranial pressure, or another pregnancy-related cause of headache. These symptoms may have been triggered by discontinuation of acetylsalicylic acid prior to delivery.19

The use of acetylsalicylic acid in pregnant women increases the risk of intrapartum bleeding (OR=1.63; 95% CI, 1.30–2.05) and postpartum bleeding (OR= 1.2; 95% CI 1.07–1.34).20,21 On the other hand, discontinuation of medication is associated with a recurrence rate 5.04 (95% CI 1.95–9.57) times more frequent in the first year after discontinuation of treatment in the form of acute attacks or chronic headaches. Therefore, the decision to discontinue antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy before delivery should be carefully considered in pregnant women with CVST.22

The patient delivered with cesarean section, and both mother and baby had favorable postoperative outcomes. Management of pregnancy in patients with a history of CVST requires a multidisciplinary team involving vascular neurology, fetal-maternal medicine, obstetric anesthesiology, and neonatology. The type of delivery method and timing should be thoroughly discussed with the patient and family. A history of CVST in pregnant women is not an absolute contraindication for vaginal delivery. In cases with moderate increased intracranial pressure, acceleration of the second stage of labor with assisted delivery methods may be performed. However, in women at very high risk of developing high intracranial pressure (hemorrhagic transformation of CVST), cesarean delivery may be considered.17 In the present case, cesarean delivery was chosen because of worsening headache at term, which raised concern regarding possible neurological deterioration and increased intracranial pressure. Although no focal neurological deficits were documented, a multidisciplinary team considered cesarean delivery to be the safest approach for maternal management.

This case has several limitations. First, thrombophilia testing, including Protein C, Protein S, Antithrombin III, Factor V Leiden mutation, antiphospholipid antibodies, and lupus anticoagulant evaluation, was not performed; therefore, an underlying thrombophilic disorder could not be excluded. Second, repeat neuroimaging was not performed during pregnancy, limiting assessment of disease progression and preventing confirmation of active thrombotic changes as the cause of worsening headache. Third, as a single case report, the findings may not be generalizable to all pregnant women with a history of CVST. Nevertheless, this case highlights important challenges regarding contraceptive counseling, anticoagulation management, and multidisciplinary decision-making during pregnancy after CVST.

This case is important because it illustrates several clinically relevant challenges: the occurrence of CVST in a reproductive-age woman exposed to prolonged hormonal contraception, inadequate counseling regarding thromboembolic risks, suboptimal anticoagulation during pregnancy, and the diagnostic complexity of CVST due to its nonspecific presentation. Furthermore, it highlights the critical role of advanced neuroimaging techniques in establishing an early and accurate diagnosis, facilitating multidisciplinary management, and ultimately contributing to favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes despite the high-risk clinical setting.

Conclusion

Women with a history of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis require careful contraceptive counseling, individualized pregnancy-safe anticoagulation planning, and multidisciplinary management throughout pregnancy and delivery. This case highlights the potential consequences of inappropriate hormonal contraceptive use and suboptimal anticoagulation management in women with previous CVST. Early risk assessment and coordinated care involving neurology, maternal–fetal medicine, and obstetric teams are essential to optimize maternal and fetal outcomes.

Acknowledgment

This publication charge is funded by Unpad through the Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP) on behalf of the Indonesian Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology and managed under the EQUITY Program (Contract No. 4303/ B3/DT.03.08/2025 and 3927/UN6. RKT/HK.07.00/2025).

Ethics Approval

Institutional approval was not required for the publication of this single-patient case report, in accordance with institutional policies and the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Patient Statement

The authors confirm that written informed consent was obtained from the patient. The patient was informed about the details of the case and provided approval for the publication of the case report, including any accompanying images. All identifying information has been appropriately anonymized to ensure patient confidentiality.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Park E, Dhanjal M, Gupta S, et al. Intrapartum management of anticoagulation in a pregnant woman with acute cerebral venous sinus thrombosis undergoing vaginal delivery. Obstet Med. 2025;1753495X251361665. doi: 10.1177/1753495X251361665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aggarwal S, Kumar A, Deo V, Tabassum H. Epidemiology and risk factors for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: insights from leading centres in the i-RegVeD registry, India. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):22712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07599-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Payne AB, Adamski A, Abe K, et al. Epidemiology of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis with thrombocytopenia in the United States, 2018 and 2019. Res Pract Thrombosis Haemostasis. 2022;6(2):e12682. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coutinho JM, Ferro JM, Canhao P, et al. Cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis in women. Stroke. 2009;40(7):2356–7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.543884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Abou-Ismail MY, Sridhar DC, Nayak L. Estrogen and thrombosis: a bench to bedside review. Thrombosis Res. 2020;192:40–51. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.05.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Algahtani H, Bazaid A, Shirah B, Bouges RN. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in pregnancy and puerperium: a comprehensive review. Brain Circ. 2022;8(4):180–187. doi: 10.4103/bc.bc_50_22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Amalia L. Clinical CVST patient characteristics in inpatient ward at RS Hasan Sadikin Bandung [Karakteristik klinis pasien trombosis sinus venosus serebral (TSVS) di ruang rawat inap neurologi rumah sakit hasan sadikin bandung]. Jurnal Neuroanestesi Indonesia. 2020;9(2):71–77. doi: 10.24244/jni.v9i2.244 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Oliveira IM, Duarte JÁ, Dalaqua M, Jarry VM, Pereira FV, Reis F. Cerebral venous thrombosis: imaging patterns. Radiologia Brasileira. 2022;55(1):54–61. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2021.0019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.van Hylckama Vlieg A, Helmerhorst FM, Rosendaal FR. The risk of deep venous thrombosis associated with injectable depot–medroxyprogesterone acetate contraceptives or a levonorgestrel intrauterine device. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis Vasc Biol. 2010;30(11):2297–2300. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.211482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Roeder HJ, Lopez JR, Miller EC. Ischemic stroke and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in pregnancy. Handbook Clin Neurol. 2020;172:3–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Saposnik G, Bushnell C, Coutinho JM, et al. Diagnosis and management of cerebral venous thrombosis: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Stroke. 2024;55(3):e77–e90. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bergendal A, Persson I, Odeberg J, et al. Association of venous thromboembolism with hormonal contraception and thrombophilic genotypes. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(3):600–609. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Amoozegar F, Ronksley PE, Sauve R, Menon BK. Hormonal contraceptives and cerebral venous thrombosis risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2015;6:7. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bulan DCE, Takahepis N, Kasim Z. Maternal knowledge in selecting contraseptive method [Pengetahuan ibu tentang metode KB dengan pemilihan metode kontrasepsi]. Jurnal Riset Ilmu Kesehatan Umum Dan Farmasi. 2025;3(3):38–48. doi: 10.57213/jrikuf.v3i3.655 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.World Health Organization. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use. World Health Organization; 2025. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.World Health Organization, Health WHOR. Health Worker Role in Providing Safe Abortion Care and Post Abortion Contraception. World Health Organization; 2015. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ladhani NNN, Swartz RH, Foley N, et al. Canadian stroke best practice consensus statement: acute stroke management during pregnancy. Int J Stroke. 2018;13(7):743–758. doi: 10.1177/1747493018786617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bates SM, Rajasekhar A, Middeldorp S, et al. American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: venous thromboembolism in the context of pregnancy. Blood Adv. 2018;2(22):3317–3359. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Amalia L. The role of platelet-selectin as a marker of thrombocyte aggregation on cerebral sinus venous thrombosis. J Blood Med. 2022;Volume 13:267–274. doi: 10.2147/JBM.S356028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hastie R, Tong S, Wikström A-K, Sandström A, Hesselman S, Bergman L. Aspirin use during pregnancy and the risk of bleeding complications: a Swedish population-based cohort study. Am J Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(1):95.e1–e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jiang Y, Chen Z, Chen Y, et al. Low-dose asprin use during pregnancy may be a potential risk for postpartum hemorrhage and increased blood loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023;5(4):100878. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100878 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Landman AJ, van Limburg Stirum EV, Van’t Hooft J, et al. Long-term outcomes following antenatal exposure to low-dose aspirin: study protocol for the 4-year follow-up of the April randomised controlled trial. BMJ open. 2022;12(8):e060632. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Women's Health are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES