Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1974 Jan;21(1):75–88. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-75

Generalization of free-operant avoidance behavior in pigeons1

Marty Klein, Mark Rilling
PMCID: PMC1333171  PMID: 16811735

Abstract

Three groups of four pigeons, trained to press a treadle on a free-operant avoidance schedule, were given auditory discrimination training. Alternating 2-min components of avoidance and no shock were paired with either a tone or white noise. The pigeons were subsequently given two types of generalization tests, with and without avoidable shocks scheduled. Two of the groups, trained interdimensionally, produced excitatory and inhibitory generalization gradients along the tone frequency dimension. A predicted post-discrimination gradient was computed from the algebraic summation of these gradients of excitation and inhibition. The predicted gradient was compared with the actual post-discrimination gradient obtained from the third group of pigeons that had been given intradimensional discrimination training on the tone frequency dimension. The predicted postdiscrimination gradient agreed in shape with the empirical postdiscrimination gradient. The results in general support Spence's (1937) gradient interaction theory.

Full text

PDF
75

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AZRIN N. H. A technique for delivering shock to pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959 Apr;2:161–163. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1959.2-161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DENNY M. R., ADELMAN H. M. Elicitation theory. I. An analysis of two typical learning situations. Psychol Rev. 1955 Jul;62(4):290–296. doi: 10.1037/h0046265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Desiderato O. Generalization of excitation and inhibition in control of avoidance responding by Pavlovian CSs in dogs. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1969 Aug;68(4):611–616. doi: 10.1037/h0027678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HEARST E. Concurrent generalization gradients for food-controlled and shock-controlled behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Jan;5:19–31. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HOFFMAN H. S., FLESHLER M. Aversive control with the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959 Jul;2:213–218. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1959.2-213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HOFFMAN H. S., FLESHLER M., CHORNY H. Discriminated bar-press avoidance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Oct;4:309–316. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HOFFMAN H. S., FLESHLER M. Stimulus factors in aversive controls: the generalization of conditioned suppression. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Oct;4:371–378. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hearst E., Besley S., Farthing G. W. Inhibition and the stimulus control of operant behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Nov;14(3 Pt 2 Suppl):373–409. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-s373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hearst E. Discrimination learning as the summation of excitation and inhibition. Science. 1968 Dec 13;162(3859):1303–1306. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. JENKINS H. M., HARRISON R. H. Generalization gradients of inhibition following auditory discrimination learning. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:435–441. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Klein M., Rilling M. Effects of response-shock interval and shock intensity on free-operant avoidance responding in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Sep;18(2):295–303. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Marsh G. Prediction of the peak shift in pigeons from gradients of excitation and inhibition. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1972 Nov;81(2):262–266. doi: 10.1037/h0033538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rachlin H., Hineline P. N. Training and maintenance of keypecking in the pigeon by negative reinforcement. Science. 1967 Aug 25;157(3791):954–955. doi: 10.1126/science.157.3791.954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SIDMAN M. Avoidance conditioning with brief shock and no exteroceptive warning signal. Science. 1953 Aug 7;118(3058):157–158. doi: 10.1126/science.118.3058.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. SIDMAN M. Two temporal parameters of the maintenance of avoidance behavior by the white rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1953 Aug;46(4):253–261. doi: 10.1037/h0060730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sidman M. Stimulus generalization in an avoidance situation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Apr;4(2):157–169. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Siegel A. Stimulus generalization of a classically conditioned response along a temporal dimension. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1967 Dec;64(3):461–466. doi: 10.1037/h0025211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Smith R. F., Keller F. R. Free-operant avoidance in the pigeon using a treadle response. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):211–214. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. WERTHEIM G. A. SEQUENTIAL PROPERTIES OF SIDMAN-AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Mar;7:170–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES