Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2026 Jun 13;16:20541. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-56608-0

Clinical ethical practice and associated factors among health professionals in public hospitals in addis ababa, Ethiopia

Senait Muluken 1, Sisay Girma 2, Tizalegn Tesfaye 3, Dawit Getachew 4, Adane Tesfaye 5,✉
PMCID: PMC13332012  PMID: 42288621

Abstract

Clinical ethical practice involves applying moral reasoning and ethical principles to routine patient care decisions, ensuring that healthcare professionals act honorably, respectfully, and responsibly. This study aimed to assess clinical ethical practice and associated factors among health professionals in public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. An institution‑based cross‑sectional study was conducted from August 15 to September 15, 2025, among 372 health professionals selected through simple random sampling from four public hospitals. Data were collected using self‑administered questionnaires which were adapted from existing literature. Analyses were performed using STATA version 15.1. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied. Variables with p < 0.25 in bivariable logistic regression were entered into multivariable logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. A total of 372 health professionals participated, yielding a 100% response rate. The magnitude of favorable knowledge, attitude, and practice of clinical ethics among participants was 61.7% (95% CI: 56.7–66.7), 50.5% (95% CI: 45.4–55.6), and 50.5% (95% CI: 45.4–55.6), respectively. In multivariable logistic regression, higher monthly salary (AOR = 3.36, 95% CI: 1.49–7.58), ethics training (AOR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.11–3.75), and favorable knowledge (AOR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.15–3.80) were positively associated with ethical practice, whereas longer work experience was negatively associated (AOR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.23–0.88). Clinical ethical practice among health professionals was moderate, with nearly half lacking favorable knowledge, attitudes, and practice. Work experience, salary, training, and knowledge were significant determinants. Strengthening ethics education, continuous professional development, and institutional support is essential to enhance ethical adherence.

Keywords: Clinical ethical practice, Ethics, Health ethics, Health professionals

Subject terms: Health care, Health occupations, Medical research

Introduction

Clinical ethical practice is a cornerstone of modern healthcare, ensuring that patient care decisions are guided not only by technical competence but also by moral responsibility1–4. It encompasses respecting patients’ rights and preferences, ensuring informed consent, maintaining confidentiality, and promoting fairness in the allocation of resources1,4,5. Beyond technical competence, clinical ethical practice bridges medical knowledge with moral responsibility to improve the quality and equity of healthcare delivery4,6,7.

Clinical ethical practice is increasingly recognized as a global priority in healthcare, as professionals across diverse settings frequently encounter dilemmas related to informed consent, confidentiality, end‑of‑life care, and equitable resource allocation1,2.

In low‑ and middle‑income countries, these challenges are amplified by constrained resources, cultural diversity, and limited institutional frameworks to support ethical decision‑making. Ethiopia is no exception, where health professionals in public hospitals often struggle to consistently apply ethical principles due to inadequate training, high patient loads, and weak organizational support8–10.

Clinical ethical practice is shaped by multiple contributing factors that influence how health professionals apply ethical principles in daily care. Factors such as professional satisfaction, availability of functional clinical ethics committees and supportive institutional frameworks, ethics education of pre and in-service training, compassionate and respectful leadership increase the practice of8,11–13. Conversely, high workload, poor infrastructure, and unfavorable attitudes can be barriers to ethical practice8,14. This study aimed to assess clinical ethical practice and associated factors among health professionals in public hospitals in Ethiopia.

Methods and materials

Study area and period

The study was conducted in four public hospitals of Addis Ababa (Yekatit 12, Zewditu, Ras Desta, and ALERT) between August 15 and September 15, 2025. Addis Ababa is the capital of Ethiopia administratively divided into 11 sub cities and 116 woreda. Maps were generated using ArcMap 10.7 (Esri, Redlands, CA, USA; https://www.esri.com) based on 2021 shapefile boundaries from the Ethiopian Statistical Agency (Fig. 1). There were 14 governmental and 25 private hospitals in the city .

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Map of study area generated using ArcMap 10.7, based on 2021 shapefile boundaries from the Ethiopian Statistical Agency.

Study design

An institutional‑based cross‑sectional study was conducted.

Population

The source population of the study were all health professionals that are working at public hospitals of Addis Ababa, while the study population were randomly selected health professionals that are working at selected public hospitals of Addis Ababa.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Health professionals currently working in public hospitals during the study period were included. Health professionals on apprenticeship or internship, those with less than six months of work experience, and staff without direct patient contact (e.g., CEOs, medical directors, and administrative managers) were excluded from the study.

Sample size determination and sampling procedure

The sample size for the study was determined using single population proportion formula. The following assumptions will be used: magnitude of good ethical practice (p) 32.7% in Ethiopia8, the margin of error (d) 5%, confidence level of 95%, and 10% non- response rate (NR), the final sample size of the study was 372. From the total 14 public hospitals in the city four hospitals namely Yikatit 12 hospitals, Zewditu hospitals, Ras-Desta hospitals and ALERT hospitals was selected by simple random sampling methods. The sample size was proportionally allocated based on the number of health professionals currently working in those selected hospitals. Finally study participants were randomly selected.

Study variables

Dependent variable: Clinical ethical practice.

Independent variables: Socio demographic factors (Age, sex, educational level, marital status, income), Knowledge towards health ethics, Attitude toward health ethics, Job related factors: profession, work experience, job satisfaction, ethics training.

Data collection tools and procedures

Data were collected using a standardized, pretested, self‑administered questionnaire adapted from prior Ethiopian and international studies8,9,11. The questionnaire contains socio-demographic characteristics, clinical ethical practice, knowledge and attitude of health ethics, professional satisfaction, availability of clinical ethical committees (CECs), and previous educational curriculum.

Operational definitions

Clinical Ethical Practice: assessed using 16 item a 4-Likert scale type response. Respondents who answered ≥ 75% of the items were classified as having favorable clinical ethical practice. while those who answered ≤ 75% had unfavorable CEP8,15.

Attitude towards clinical ethics: assessed using 14-item questions with a 5-Likert scale response. Respondent scored ≥ 75% of the questions had favorable attitudes towards clinical ethics, while those who answered ≤ 75% had unfavorable attitudes towards CEP8,9,15.

Clinical/health ethical Knowledge: assessed using nine yes/no questions about the application of the code of ethics. Respondents who replied ≥ 75% of the questions had favorable knowledge towards clinical ethics, while those who answered less than or equal to 75% had unfavorable knowledge towards CEP8,9,15.

Data quality management

The questionnaire was pretested among 20 health professionals at Menelik II hospital, and necessary modifications were made. The tool was locally validated, and internal reliability was assessed (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.81), indicating acceptable consistency. Training was given for four data collectors BSc in public health by profession and one master of public health supervisor about the purpose of the study, data collection tools and procedures.

Data processing and analysis

Data were collected using Kobo Toolbox and exported to STATA version 15.1. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize variables. Logistic regression was conducted to identify factors associated with clinical ethical practice, with variables significant at p < 0.25 in bivariable analysis entered into multivariable analysis to avoid excluding potentially important variables. Statistical significance was declared at p < 0.05.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

In this study, 368 health professionals participated, yielding a response rate of 98.9%. Among the study participants 168 (45.7%) were males. The mean age was 37.2 (SD ± 4.3) years. Majority 239 (64.9%) had BSc degree and 208(56.5%) of them were married (Table 1).

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics of health care professionals working in public hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2025.

Independent variables Category N(%)
Age (years) 21–30 years 214(58.2)
31–40 years 154(41.8)
Sex Female 200(54.3)
Male 168(45.7)
Educational level Diploma 12(3.3)
BSc 239(64.9)
General Practitioner 53(14.4)
MSc or MPH 32(8.7)
Specialist 32 (8.7)
Marital status Single 160(43.5)
Married 208(56.5)
Profession Nurse 158(42.9)
public health 26(7.1)
Physician 73(19.8)
Midwives 31(8.4)
Pharmacy 33(9.0)
Laboratory 29(7.9)
Others 18(4.9)
Work experience Juniors 133(36.1)
Seniors 159(43.2)
Experts 53(14.4)
Chief 23(6.3)
Monthly salary < 8233.49 birr/months 233(63.3)
>=8233.4 birr/month 135(36.7)

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of health professionals towards CEP

Regarding knowledge of CEP, 227(61.7%) of the respondents had good knowledge on component of CEP. also, 186(50.5%) had favorable attitude toward CEP, scoring above the mean score value for CEP (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of health professionals towards clinical ethical practice in public hospitals, addis ababa, Ethiopia, 2025.

Profession-related characteristics

Among the study participants, 226 (61.4%) were happy with their current profession, and 204 (55.4%) chose their current profession by when they joined the university. Most study participants219 (59.5%) were ready to recommend others to pursue their current professions. Almost half of the participants were unaware of an ethics committee, most learned ethics through training, some reported inadequate curriculum coverage, a portion had faced unethical practice accusations, improper discharge was the most common ethical dilemma, and more than half were dissatisfied with their jobs (Table 2).

Table 2.

Profession-related characteristics of health care professionals working in public hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2025.

Independent variables Category N(%)
Happy with current profession Yes 226(61.4)
No 142(38.6)
First choice of your profession Yes 204(55.4)
No 164(44.6)
Advising of others to pursue your profession Yes 219(59.5)
No 149(40.5)
Source of information for code of ethics University 155(42.1)
Training 195(53.0)
Others 18(4.9)
Know the presence of ethical committee Yes 172(46.7)
No 196(53.3)
The function of the ethics committee Correction measure 140(38.0)
Punishment 130(35.3)
Advice 73(19.8)
Treatment 25(6.8)
Curriculum adequacy in the University or college Yes 206(56.0)
No 102(27.7)
I don’t remember 60 (16.3)
Facing ethical problems in his or her experience Yes 231(62.8)
No 137(37.2)
Perceived reason for unethical Practice Workload 272(73.9)
Negligence 47(12.8)
Lack of knowledge 33(9.0)
Insufficient salary 16(4.3)
Accused regarding an ethical issue Yes 62(16.8)
No 306(83.2)
Encountered ethical dilemma Yes 254(69.0)
No 114(31.0)
Common ethical dilemma Religious issue 161(43.8)
Improper discharge 109(29.6)
Truth telling 72(19.6)
End of life issue 26(7.1)
Satisfaction with your job Satisfied 178(48.4)
Unsatisfied 190(51.6)

Factors associated with clinical ethical practice

Sex, educational level, profession, work experience, monthly salary, choice profession, source of information, curriculum adequacy, ethical problem experience, satisfaction with job, knowledge and attitude were candidate variables entered into multivariable logistic regression analysis. Among these work experience AOR = 0.45,95%CI: (0.23,0.88), monthly salary (AOR = 3.36, 95% CI: 1.49–7.58), training (AOR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.11–3.75), and knowledge (AOR = 2.09,95% CI: 1.15,3.8) were significantly associated with the CEP (Table 3).

Table 3.

Bivariable and multivariable analyses for factors associated with the CEP in public hospitals of Addis Ababa in 2025.

Variables Category CEP COR95%CI AOR95%CI
Favorable Unfavorable
Sex Female 114 86 1.77(1.17,2.68)* 0.63(0.30,1.31)
Male 72 96 1 1
Education Degree & below 168 136 3.16(1.75,5.70)* 1.15(0.49,2.73)
Above degree 18 46 1 1
Profession Nurse 87 71 1 1
Public health 12 14 0.70(0.30,1.61) 0.46(0.16,1.30)
Physician 14 59 0.19(0.10,0.38)* 0.09(0.03,2.57)
Midwives 20 11 1.48(0.67,3.30) 2.59(0.85,7.89)
Pharmacy 22 11 1.63(0.74,3.59)* 0.51(0.20,1.31)
Laboratory 31 16 1.58(0.80,3.12)* 2.52(0.04,6.10)
Work experience Juniors 90 43 1 1
Seniors 64 95 0.32(0.20,0.52)* 0.45(0.23,0.88)**
Expert & above 32 44 0.35(0.19,0.62)* 0.62(0.21,1.81)
Monthly salary < 8233.49 birr 146 87 3.99(2.53,6.28)* 3.36(1.49,7.58)**
>=8233.4 birr 40 95 1 1
Choice profession Yes 115 89 1.69(1.12,2.56)* 1.84(0.93,3.62)
No 71 93 1 1
Source of information University 71 84 1 1
Training 115 98 1.39(092,2.10)* 2.04(1.11,3.75)**
Curriculum adequacy Yes 97 109 0.73(0.48,1.10)* 0.49(0.27,1.91)
No 89 73 1 1
Ethical problem Yes 128 103 1.69(1.11,2.59)* 1.95(0.96,3.98)
No 58 79 1 1
Satisfaction with job Satisfied 99 79 1.48(0.98,2.24)* 0.62(0.32,1.21)
Unsatisfied 87 103 1 1
Knowledge Unfavorable 55 86 2.13(1.39,3.28)* 2.09(1.15,3.81)**
Favorable 131 96 1 1
Attitude Unfavorable 100 82 1 1
Favorable 86 100 0.71(0.47,1.06)* 0.81(0.44,1.47)

*P < 0.25, **P < 0.05.

Discussion

Among health professionals participated in this study 38% of participants lacked favorable knowledge, and nearly half lacked favorable attitudes and practice towards CEP. Also, work experience, monthly salary, source of information, and knowledge were significantly associated with CEP.

In this study, 38% of the health professionals lack favorable knowledge regarding CEP. This is inline similar finding in Ethiopia and abroad8,16. Also, half of the participant lack favorable attitude towards CEP. Which is lower than finding from Ethiopia8.

Similarly, almost half of health professionals participated in this study lacks favorable CEP. This finding is consistent with the study conducted in Ethiopia and abroad17,18. However, this finding showed better proportion of health professional practicing favorable CEP than study finding in Ethiopia8,9,11. These differences may reflect curriculum variation, study period, cultural context, methodological differences, or infrastructural factors.

Senior professionals were significantly less likely to demonstrate favorable CEP compared with juniors. This may reflect burnout, moral fatigue, or reduced vigilance due to routine familiarity, whereas junior staff may apply recently acquired training more rigorously. The finding is in line with study conducted in Ethiopia18. This suggests that junior staff may be more inclined to apply recently acquired training and adhere closely to ethical standards. In contrast, senior professionals may experience burnout, moral fatigue, or reduced adherence due to routine familiarity, which can weaken ethical vigilance.

Interestingly, lower‑income professionals were more likely to demonstrate favorable ethical practice (AOR = 3.36). This paradox, also observed in Bale Zone, may be explained by Herzberg’s two‑factor theory: salary prevents dissatisfaction but does not necessarily motivate ethical commitment. Lower‑income professionals may rely more on intrinsic motivators such as responsibility and recognition18.

Moreover, ethics training increased the likelihood of favorable practice more than twofold. This finding aligns with Gondar Zone and Addis Ababa studies, which highlighted training as a determinant of ethical adherence8. Both pre‑service and in‑service training enhance knowledge, attitudes, and confidence in applying ethical standards, underscoring the need for structured ethics curricula19,20.

Professionals with favorable knowledge were 2.09 times more likely to demonstrate favorable ethical practice. This is in line Ethiopia9,11. Knowledge strengthens confidence in handling dilemmas and improves adherence to ethical principles21.

Limitation of the study

The limitation of this study is that data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire, which may have introduced response bias. Additionally, since this study relied on self‑reported data, responses may have been influenced by social desirability bias. The absence of vignette‑based questions (realistic clinical scenarios) is acknowledged as a limitation, as such approaches are considered more valid for ethical research.

Conclusion

In this study, nearly half of health professionals in Addis Ababa public hospitals lacked favorable KAP towards clinical ethical practice. Work experience, monthly salary, ethics training, and knowledge were identified as significant determinants of CEP. These findings highlight the need to strengthen ethics education, expand continuous professional development, and establish supportive institutional frameworks such as functional ethics committees. Addressing systemic factors including workload, job satisfaction, and organizational culture is also essential to sustain favorable CEP.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank study participants for their participation and also the research assistant for their dedication during data collection and data entry.

Abbreviations

AOR

Adjusted odds ratio

BSc

Bachelor of science

CEC

Clinical ethics committee

CEP

Clinical ethical practice

CI

Confidence interval

FMOH

Federal ministry of health

GP

General practitioner

MPH

Master of public health

MSc

Master of science

NR

Non-response rate

SD

Standard deviation

WHO

World health organization

Author contributions

SM, SG, TT, DG, and AT involved in the study design, literature review, analysis and manuscript writing. All the authors read and approved the final draft of the manuscript.

Data availability

The data set is available and submitted with this manuscript.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Sante Research and Publication Office Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant after assuring autonomy, confidentiality, and anonymity.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Varkey, B. Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice. Med. Princ Pract.30 (1), 17–28 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beauchamp, T. L. & Childress, J. F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics 8ed (Oxford University Press, 2019).
  • 3.WHO. Working Group on Developing WHO Guidance on Clinical Ethics. World Heath Orgnization; Available from: https://www.who.int/groups/working-group-on-developing-who-guidance-on-clinical-ethics
  • 4.WHO. guidance-on-clinical-ethics_public-consultation Working Group on Developing WHO Guidance on Clinical Ethics; (2025).
  • 5.Harrison, J. D., Logar, T., Le, P. & Glass, M. What Are the Ethical Issues Facing Global-Health Trainees Working Overseas? A Multi-Professional Qualitative Study. Healthcare4 (3), 43 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dejene, D. et al. Exploring health workforce regulation practices and gaps in Ethiopia: a national cross-sectional study. Glob Health Res. Policy. 4, 36 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Borovecki, A. Clinical Ethics–Challenges of the Past, the Present, and the Future. Philosophies10 (5), 113 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tafesse, N. et al. Clinical ethical practice and associated factors in healthcare facilities in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med. Ethics. 23 (1), 61 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yeshineh, G. et al. Practice of code of ethics and associated factors among health professionals in Central Gondar Zone public hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021: a mixed-method study design. BMC Med. Ethics. 23 (1), 68 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sibiya, B. & Rispel, L. C. Unable to dodge the bullet’: a qualitative study of ethical dilemmas and moral distress of critical care nurses during the Covid-19 pandemic in a South African Province. BMC Nurs.24 (1), 715 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tiruneh, M. A. & Ayele, B. T. Practice of code of ethics and associated factors among medical doctors in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 13 (8), e0201020 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bilgin, A. C., Timbil, S., Guvercin, C. H., Ozan, S. & Semin, S. Preclinical students’ views on medical ethics education: a focus group study in turkey. Acta Bioeth.24 (1), 105–115 (2018). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vogus, T. J. & McClelland, L. E. Actions, style and practices: how leaders ensure compassionate care delivery. BMJ Lead.4 (2), 48–52 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dehkordi, F. G., Torabizadeh, C., Rakhshan, M. & Vizeshfar, F. Barriers to ethical treatment of patients in clinical environments: A systematic narrative review. Health Sci. Rep.7 (5), e2008 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pearlman, R. A., Bottrell, M. M., Altemose, J., Foglia, M. B. & Fox, E. The IntegratedEthicsTM Staff Survey: A Tool to Evaluate and Improve Ethical Practices in Health Care. AJOB Prim. Res.4 (1), 7–19 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fadare, J. O., Desalu, O. O., Jemilohun, A. C. & Babatunde, O. A. Knowledge of medical ethics among Nigerian medical doctors. Niger Med. J.53 (4), 226–230 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hora, B. Self-rating practice of clinical ethics and associated factors among health professionals working in hospitals of Southwest and west Shoa zone, Oromia region, Ethiopia, Jimma: Jimma University; 2019. (2019).
  • 18.Desta, W. B. G. Perceived Adherence to Professional Ethics and Associated Factors Among Health Professionals in Bale Zone Public Hospitals (Oromia Regional State, 2019).
  • 19.O’Keeffe, M. et al. Placebo and nocebo in clinical practice: An online cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals from European countries on views, practices and training needs. PLOS ONE. 21 (1), e0338905 (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yarahmadi, S., Cheraghian, T. & Jafarifar, S. Legal and ethical conflicts in hospital settings: thematic synthesis of qualitative studies focused on nursing practice. BMC Med. Ethics. 26 (1), 186 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schwietering, J., Langhof, H. & Strech, D. Empirical studies on how ethical recommendations are translated into practice: a cross-section study on scope and study objectives. BMC Med. Ethics. 24 (1), 2 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data set is available and submitted with this manuscript.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES