Abstract
Two experiments were conducted demonstrating that under certain conditions pigeons may peck at a higher rate on a key that produces intermittent reinforcement following a delay than on one that always produces reinforcement following the same delay duration. In both experiments, concurrent chain schedules were employed. In Experiment I, a single peck on one key led to a white light and a delay of 15 sec, which always terminated with food. A peck on the other key led to its illumination by one of two colored lights and a delay period of 15 sec. The delay was followed by either food presentation or timeout, either one lasting 3 sec. In a control group, the lights on this key were not correlated with food or timeout. Under the correlated stimuli, birds more often pecked the key leading to intermittent reinforcement, whereas with uncorrelated stimuli they pecked the key leading to the white light and 100% reinforcement. In Experiment II, concurrent variable-interval schedules were employed in the first link. The results showed generally that the relative rate was higher on the key leading to intermittent reinforcement when the stimuli were correlated with reinforcement and timeout than on the key leading to 100% reinforcement. There was some indication that this performance was affected by (1) the duration of the delay, (2) the percentage of reinforcement on the key yielding the higher percentage of reinforcement (the key with the white light), and (3) prior experimental conditions.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Arnett F. B. Inverse relation between choice and local response rate with a schedule of response-produced blackouts. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jan;17(1):37–43. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CATANIA A. C. Behavioral contrast in a multiple and concurrent schedule of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Oct;4:335–342. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Findley J. D. Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Apr;1(2):123–144. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HERRNSTEIN R. J. SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jan;7:27–36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kendall S. B. Effects of two procedures for varying information transmission on observing responses. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jul;20(1):73–83. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NOTTERMAN J. M. A study of some relations among aperiodic reinforcement, discrimination training and secondary reinforcement. J Exp Psychol. 1951 Mar;41(3):161–169. doi: 10.1037/h0061644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WAGNER A. R. Effects of amount and percentage of reinforcement and number of acquisition trials on conditioning and extinction. J Exp Psychol. 1961 Sep;62:234–242. doi: 10.1037/h0042251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilton R. N., Clements R. O. Observing responses and informative stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Mar;15(2):199–204. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilton R. N., Clements R. O. The role of information in the emission of observing responses: a test of two hypotheses. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Sep;16(2):161–166. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeiler M. D. Fixed-interval behavior: effects of percentage reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Mar;17(2):177–189. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]