Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1974 May;21(3):501–509. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-501

Inhibitory stimulus control and the magnitude of delayed reinforcement1

Ralph W Richards
PMCID: PMC1333223  PMID: 16811762

Abstract

The key pecking of pigeons was reinforced according to a variable-interval 1-min schedule during each of two successively presented stimuli. When the key was illuminated by a black line on a white background, reinforcement was delayed for 10 sec. When the key was illuminated by a plain white light, reinforcement was not delayed. For half of the subjects, the delayed reinforcer was 4.0-sec access to mixed grain, and for the remaining subjects it was 1.5-sec access. The immediate reinforcer was 1.5-sec access for all subjects. All subjects responded at a lower rate during the presentation of the black line; no between-group difference in terms of terminal response rate during the presentation of the line was found. However, subjects that received 4.0 sec of delayed reinforcement responded at a lower terminal rate during presentation of the plain white light than subjects that received 1.5 sec of delayed reinforcement. A subsequent generalization test along the line-orientation dimension produced flatter U-shaped gradients for subjects that received 4.0-sec of delayed reinforcement.

Full text

PDF
501

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DAVENPORT J. W. The interaction of magnitude and delay of reinforcement in spatial discrimination. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1962 Apr;55:267–273. doi: 10.1037/h0043603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Deutsch J. A., Terrace H. S. Discrimination learning and inhibition. Science. 1967 May 19;156(3777):988–989. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3777.988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Farthing G. W., Hearst E. Generalization gradients of inhibition after different amounts of training. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):743–752. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hearst E. Contrast and stimulus generalization following prolonged discrimination training. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 May;15(3):355–363. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. JENKINS H. M., HARRISON R. H. Effect of discrimination training on auditory generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1960 Apr;59:246–253. doi: 10.1037/h0041661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. JENKINS H. M., HARRISON R. H. Generalization gradients of inhibition following auditory discrimination learning. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:435–441. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lyons J. Stimulus generalization as a function of discrimination learning with and without errors. Science. 1969 Jan 31;163(3866):490–491. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3866.490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Richards R. W. Reinforcement delay: some effects on behavioral contrast. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 May;17(3):381–394. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Richards R. W. Stimulus generalization and delay of reinforcement during one component of a multiple schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Mar;19(2):303–309. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Terrace H. S. Discrimination learning and inhibition. Science. 1966 Dec 30;154(3757):1677–1680. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3757.1677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Weisman R. G. Factors influencing inhibitory stimulus control: differential reinforcement of other behavior during discrimination training. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jul;14(1):87–91. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Weisman R. G., Ramsden M. Discrimination of a response-independent component in a multiple schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jan;19(1):55–64. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Weisman R. G. Some determinants of inhibitory stimulus control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):443–450. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wilkie D. M. Delayed reinforcement in a multiple schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Sep;16(2):233–239. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES