Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1974 May;21(3):553–562. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-553

Changes in progressive-ratio performance under increased pressures of air1

John R Thomas
PMCID: PMC1333227  PMID: 4838200

Abstract

Rats performed on progressive-ratio schedules that required an increasing number of responses for each successive reinforcement. The number of responses required increased until the subjects failed to complete the next ratio in the sequence within 15 min. Response-ratio increments of two responses, five responses, and 20 responses were investigated. The size of the final completed ratio generally increased with increases in the progressive-ratio step size. Increased pressures of air in a hyperbaric chamber led to both increases and decreases in terminal ratio size, with the differential effects depending on both air pressure and on the size of the progressive-ratio increment. Changes in the number of responses in the final ratio were related to increased pressures of nitrogen, as similar pressures of helium produced few effects.

Full text

PDF
553

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AZRIN N. H. Time-out from positive reinforcement. Science. 1961 Feb 10;133(3450):382–383. doi: 10.1126/science.133.3450.382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DEWS P. B. Studies on behavior. IV. Stimulant actions of methamphetamine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1958 Jan;122(1):137–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HODOS W., KALMAN G. Effects of increment size and reinforcer volume on progressive ratio performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6:387–392. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HODOS W. MOTIVATIONAL PROPERTIES OF LONG DURATIONS OF REWARDING BRAIN STIMULATION. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1965 Apr;59:219–224. doi: 10.1037/h0021818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HODOS W. Progressive ratio as a measure of reward strength. Science. 1961 Sep 29;134(3483):943–944. doi: 10.1126/science.134.3483.943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. THOMPSON D. M. ESCAPE FROM SD ASSOCIATED WITH FIXED-RATIO REINFORCEMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jan;7:1–8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. THOMPSON D. M. PUNISHMENT BY SD ASSOCIATED WITH FIXED-RATIO REINFORCEMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 May;8:189–194. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Thomas J. R. Amphetamine and chlordiazepoxide effects on behavior under increased pressures of nitrogen. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1973 Jul-Aug;1(4):421–426. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(73)90008-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Thomas J. R. Nitrogen, helium, and neon effects on timing behavior at increased pressures. Aerosp Med. 1973 Jan;44(1):45–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Thompson D. M. Enhancement of progressive-ratio performance by chlordiazepoxide and phenobarbital. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Mar;17(2):287–292. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. WALLER M. B., MORSE W. H. Effects of pentobarbital on fixed-ratio reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jan;6:125–130. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES