Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1974 Jul;22(1):121–129. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-121

Behavior under large values of the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule1

W Kirk Richardson, Tomas E Loughead
PMCID: PMC1333248  PMID: 16811770

Abstract

Pigeons pecked a key and rats pressed a lever for food reinforcement under large values of the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule. Each subject was tested under 10 different schedule values ranging from 1 to 45 min and was exposed to each schedule value at least twice. The mean interresponse time and mean interreinforcement time increased with the schedule value according to power functions. Response-probability functions were computed for schedule values below 20 min and showed an increase in response probability as a function of time since the last response in most cases. Mean responses per reinforcer increased as a function of schedule value for the rats, but decreased as a function of schedule value for the pigeons. The proportion of responses with interresponse times shorter than 1 sec were an increasing function of schedule value for the pigeons, but did not vary as a function of schedule value for the rats.

Full text

PDF
121

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANGER D. The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times. J Exp Psychol. 1956 Sep;52(3):145–161. doi: 10.1037/h0041255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dews P. B. The effect of multiple S-delta periods on responding on a fixed-interval schedule: 3. Effect of changes in pattern of interruptions, parameters and stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Nov;8(6):427–435. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Laties V. G., Weiss B., Weiss A. B. Further observations on overt "mediating" behavior and the discrimination of time. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jan;12(1):43–57. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Richardson W. K., Loughead T. E. The effect of physical restraint on behavior under the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):455–461. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. STADDON J. E. SOME PROPERTIES OF SPACED RESPONDING IN PIGEONS. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Jan;8:19–27. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Skinner B. F., Morse W. H. Sustained performance during very long experimental sessions. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Aug;1(3):235–244. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. WILSON M. P., KELLER F. S. On the selective reinforcement of spaced responses. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1953 Jun;46(3):190–193. doi: 10.1037/h0057705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zeiler M. D. Reinforcement of spaced responding in a simultaneous discrimination. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Nov;18(3):443–451. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES