Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1974 Jul;22(1):143–150. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-143

Preference for signalled reinforcement1

Paul Lewis, Lewis Lewin, Penny Muehleisen, Michael Stoyak
PMCID: PMC1333252  PMID: 16811773

Abstract

Key pecking was reinforced on a two-component multiple schedule. A variable-interval schedule controlled reinforcement in both components. During one component, access to reinforcement was preceded by a tone; in the other component, a standard unsignalled schedule was in effect. After performance stabilized, subjects were given a choice between the signalled and unsignalled schedules. They were placed in the chamber with the unsignalled schedule in effect on the right key. A single response on the left, or changeover, key produced the signalled schedule for 1 min. Both pigeons in Experiment I pecked the changeover key at a rate sufficient to remain under the signalled schedule for over 90% of the session. Removing and reintroducing the tone demonstrated that the changeover-key responses were due to the occurrence of the tone. In Experiment II, when pecking the changeover key produced the unsignalled schedule, pecking the changeover key declined. The results may be explained either in terms of Hendry's information hypothesis or as escape from an intermittent positive reinforcement schedule.

Full text

PDF
143

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AZRIN N. H. Time-out from positive reinforcement. Science. 1961 Feb 10;133(3450):382–383. doi: 10.1126/science.133.3450.382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Badia P., Culbertson S., Lewis P. The relative aversiveness of signalled vs unsignalled avoidance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jul;16(1):113–121. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Badia P., Culbertson S. The relative aversiveness of signalled vs unsignalled escapable and inescapable shock. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 May;17(3):463–471. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bower G., McLean J., Meacham J. Value of knowing when reinforcement is due. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1966 Oct;62(2):184–192. doi: 10.1037/h0023682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown P. L., Jenkins H. M. Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):1–8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown T. G., Flory R. K. Schedule-induced escape from fixed-interval reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 May;17(3):395–403. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cantor M. B., LoLordo V. M. Rats prefer signaled reinforcing brain stimulation to unsignaled ESB. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1970 May;71(2):183–191. doi: 10.1037/h0029122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FLESHLER M., HOFFMAN H. S. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:529–530. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HERRNSTEIN R. J. SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jan;7:27–36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LUTZ R. E., PERKINS C. C., Jr A time variable in the acquisition of observing responses. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1960 Apr;53:180–182. doi: 10.1037/h0042564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. PERKINS C. C., Jr The stimulus conditions which follow learned responses. Psychol Rev. 1955 Sep;62(5):341–348. doi: 10.1037/h0040520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. PROKASY W. F., Jr The acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential external reinforcement. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1956 Apr;49(2):131–134. doi: 10.1037/h0046740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Seligman M. E. Chronic fear produced by unpredictable electric shock. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1968 Oct;66(2):402–411. doi: 10.1037/h0026355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. VERHAVE T. TOWARDS AN EMPIRICAL CALCULUS OF REINFORCEMENT VALUE. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Oct;6:525–536. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wilton R. N., Clements R. O. Observing responses and informative stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Mar;15(2):199–204. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. ZIMMERMAN J. TECHNIQUE FOR SUSTAINING BEHAVIOR WITH CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT. Science. 1963 Nov 8;142(3593):682–684. doi: 10.1126/science.142.3593.682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES