Abstract
Upland Soil Cluster Gamma (USCγ) is a key high-affinity aerobic methanotroph driving atmospheric methane oxidation in grassland soils; however, it has never been obtained in pure culture, and its metabolic processes remain largely unknown. Here, we reconstructed a USCγ metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) containing the complete pmoA gene from desert grassland soil in northwestern China, designated USC_AKS. At the site, USCγ accounted for 9.83% of the microbial community in the 10–20 cm layer. BLASTn of its 16S rRNA gene against the NCBI database (excluding uncultured/environmental sequences) showed 93.03% similarity to the non-methanotroph Thioalkalivibrio sulfidiphilus HL-EbGr7 (order Chromatiales). The closest match among named species was an uncultured bacterium (JN672117) at 97.86% similarity. Its pmoA shares 96.18% similarity with the original USCγ-defining sequence. Phylogenomic analysis placed USC_AKS and seven other USCγ MAGs into a monophyletic group of three subclades, distantly related to culturable Type I methanotrophs. Their genomic average nucleotide identity values are all below 95%, confirming eight distinct species. Like other USCγ MAGs, USC_AKS encodes a complete pmoCAB operon, an XoxF-type methanol dehydrogenase, and enzymes for formaldehyde oxidation to CO2. However, it lacks key ribulose monophosphate (RuMP) cycle genes encoding 3-hexulose-6-phosphate synthase (hps) and 6-phospho-3-hexulose isomerase (phi). The serine cycle also appears incomplete, as these MAGs lack hpr, the gene encoding hydroxypyruvate reductase. Moreover, none encode Rubisco, ruling out the Calvin–Benson–Bassham CO2-fixation pathway. Consequently, the metabolic characteristics of USCγ—particularly its carbon assimilation pathway—remain enigmatic, and obtaining pure cultures or enriched consortia is likely the only route to resolving this mystery.
Keywords: USCγdesert grassland, metagenome-assembled genome, pmoA
Introduction
Soil microbial activity constitutes the sole biological process capable of oxidizing atmospheric methane at trace levels (~1.946 ppmv) [1]. Among aerobic methanotrophs, the uncultivated Upland Soil Cluster Alpha (USCα) and Upland Soil Cluster Gamma (USCγ) are considered the primary drivers of atmospheric methane oxidation [2]. USCα is frequently detected in acidic to neutral environments [3], whereas USCγ prevails in alkaline grassland soils, such as those in the Loess Plateau [4], Inner Mongolia [5], and Xinjiang, China [6, 7]. To date, no USCγ strain or enrichment culture has been obtained, and information on its physiological and metabolic characteristics remains very limited.
Aerobic methanotrophs are traditionally classified into Gammaproteobacterial (Type I) and Alphaproteobacterial (Type II) based on their membrane architecture and carbon assimilation pathways [1, 8]. The core carbon assimilation pathway of Type I methanotrophs is the ribulose monophosphate (RuMP) pathway, whereas the characteristic pathway of Type II methanotrophs is the serine cycle. USCα belongs to Type IIb, while USCγ is classified as Type Id [8]. However, it should be noted that genes encoding serine cycle enzymes can occur in both Type I and Type II methanotrophs, and a complete set of the entire cycle is not always present [9].
Metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) analysis represents an important approach for investigating the metabolism of unexplored lineages and certain novel methanotrophs [10]. Existing MAG analyses of various methanotrophs have revealed new functional traits and metabolic details [11, 12]. Compared with USCγ, studies on USCα (including the RA14, JR1/Cluster 5, and MHP clades) have been relatively comprehensive [13, 14]. For example, the MAG of the USCα taxon Candidatus Methyloaffinis lahnbergensis, derived from forest soils, was found to harbor numerous genes for the synthesis of extracellular polysaccharides associated with biofilm formation [13].
To date, only a few MAGs have been recovered for the USCγ clade. In 2017, the first high-affinity methanotroph genome from Antarctic mineral permafrost was assembled and designated USCγ_Taylor. The authors reported that USCγ_Taylor, which belongs to the Type I methanotrophs (Gammaproteobacteria), contained an almost complete serine pathway, which is typically associated with Type II methanotrophs, rather than the ribulose monophosphate (RuMP) pathway commonly found in Type I methanotrophs. Furthermore, its 488 nt-long 16S rRNA gene shared 99% identity with uncultured bacteria (JQ684308, HM445440, and DQ823229) and 94% identity with Thioalkalivibrio (NR_074692) and Ectothiorhodospira (NR_125567) of the order Chromatiales, a group phylogenetically closely related to Methylococcales but containing no known methanotrophs [15]. In 2021, MGR_bin175 (~93% complete, 4.42% contaminated) from Antarctica’s Mackay Glacier region was reported to carry USCγ pmoA genes, although these sequences were not analyzed in depth [16]. More recently, USCγ MAGs have been reported from Lehman Cave wb1-P19 in Great Basin National Park, Nevada, USA, and from four aerated limestone and basalt caves in Australia. The Lehman Cave wb-P19 MAG encodes particulate methane monooxygenase (pmoCAB), enzymes involved in methanol, formaldehyde, and formate oxidation, and a complete serine cycle, but lacks Rubisco and known CO2 fixation pathways [17]. The four MAGs from Australian caves also lack key genes for the serine cycle, RuMP pathway, and Calvin–Benson–Bassham (CBB) cycle, leaving their carbon fixation mechanisms unresolved [18]. Importantly, these findings remain far from adequate to provide a comprehensive depiction of the physiology and metabolism of USCγ.
Here, we obtained a USCγ MAG (USC_AKS) from a temperate desert soil in northwestern China through metagenomic sequencing and assembly. By reconstructing its central metabolism, placing it in a phylogenetic context, and systematically comparing it with seven published MAGs, we provide new data that contribute to a comprehensive view of the USCγ metabolic network.
Materials and methods
Soil sampling
The soil samples used in this study were collected in September 2019 from a temperate desert in Aksai Kazakh Autonomous County, Gansu Province, China (39°8′N, 94°6′E), at an elevation of 3370 m above sea level (a.s.l.). The site has a mean annual temperature of 1–2°C and a mean annual precipitation of 20–80 mm. The dominant grassland species at this location include Salsola laricifolia, Atraphaxis pungens, and Juncus bufonius. After the sampling points were selected, four areas of 10 m × 10 m plots were designated as biological replicates (R1 to R4), with a minimum distance of 100 m between plots. In each plot, four soil cores were randomly collected at 10 cm intervals to a depth of 40 cm. The four soil layers obtained at each depth were then combined to form a composite sample. Fresh soil samples were transported to the laboratory in a refrigerated container and then sieved through a 2 mm mesh to remove plant roots, debris, and gravel. The samples were subsequently stored at −20°C for DNA analysis and metagenomic sequencing.
Soil particle composition was analyzed using a laser particle size analyzer (LS13320, Beckman Coulter, Inc.), after sieving (2 mm) 5 g of soil that had been air-dried at room temperature for seven days. Soil moisture, pH, total carbon (TC), and total nitrogen (TN) (g kg−1), as well as ammonium (NH4+–N) and nitrate (NO3−–N) (mg kg−1) nitrogen, were measured as previously described by Wang et al. [4]. The results of soil particle composition and soil physicochemical properties are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Physicochemical properties of AKS soils at different depths.
| Depths | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–10 cm | 10–20 cm | 20–30 cm | 30–40 cm | |
| Particle size composition | ||||
| <5 μm | 25.68 ± 0.54 a | 24.50 ± 1.07 a | 22.78 ± 1.04 a | 24.50 ± 1.99 a |
| 5–10 μm | 9.40 ± 0.11 a | 9.50 ± 0.36 a | 9.58 ± 0.50 a | 10.03 ± 0.22 a |
| 10–50 μm | 32.68 ± 0.62 b | 34.33 ± 0.76 ab | 35.55 ± 0.67 a | 36.45 ± 0.71 a |
| 50–100 μm | 20.58 ± 0.25 a | 20.18 ± 1.11 a | 20.05 ± 1.11 a | 19.53 ± 0.97 a |
| 100–500 μm | 11.45 ± 0.43 ab | 11.30 ± 0.61 ab | 11.65 ± 0.92 a | 9.46 ± 0.51 b |
| 500–1500 μm | 0.23 ± 0.11 ab | 0.20 ± 0.04 ab | 0.40 ± 0.17 a | 0.04 ± 0.02 b |
| pH | 8.73 ± 0.08 a | 8.76 ± 0.09 a | 8.79 ± 0.09 a | 8.84 ± 0.08 a |
| Soil Moisture, % | 9.79 ± 0.75 b | 12.94 ± 0.88 a | 14.32 ± 0.47 a | 14.46 ± 0.55 a |
| NO3—N, mg kg−1 | 2.51 ± 0.49 a | 1.93 ± 0.24 ab | 1.48 ± 0.07 b | 1.52 ± 0.06 b |
| NH4+–N, mg kg−1 | 8.48 ± 1.64 a | 7.90 ± 1.53 a | 7.01 ± 0.42 a | 7.27 ± 0.46 a |
| Total nitrogen, g kg−1 | 0.59 ± 0.03 a | 0.50 ± 0.06 a | 0.34 ± 0.04 b | 0.36 ± 0.01 b |
| Total carbon, g kg−1 | 25.95 ± 0.30 a | 25.58 ± 1.38 a | 24.25 ± 1.03 a | 24.68 ± 0.90 a |
Note: Data followed by different characters in a row are significant differences (P < 0.05). Data followed by character ab means no significant differences (P > 0.05) with other data in the same row.
Total genomic DNA was extracted from AKS soil samples using the Mag-Bind® Soil DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. DNA concentration and purity were determined using a TBS-380 and a NanoDrop 2000, respectively. DNA quality was checked on a 1.20% agarose gel, and the samples were then stored at −20°C for amplicon sequencing.
Real-time quantitative PCR and MiSeq sequencing of the 16S rRNA and pmoA genes
For the 16S rRNA gene, the primers 515F/907R [19] were used to determine bacterial abundance via real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). The details of the qPCR procedure have been described previously [4]. The amplification efficiency for the 16S rRNA gene was 92.60%, with an R2 value of 0.99. Additionally, a 7-bp sample-specific adaptor sequence was attached to the 5′ end of 515F primer for Illumina MiSeq sequencing to simultaneously assess the community composition of methanotrophs and their relative abundance within the total bacterial population. For the pmoA gene, the primers A189f/A682r [20] were used to determine methanotroph abundance using qPCR. The amplification efficiency for the pmoA gene was 90.30%, with an R2 value of 0.99. The primer pairs A189f/A682r and A189f/mb661r/A650 [21] were used for semi-nested PCR amplification to characterize the methanotroph community composition in the soil as described previously [22].
All sequencing amplicons were verified on 1.20% (w/v) agarose gels stained with GoldView. Bands of the expected size (~390 bp for the 16S rRNA gene and 510 bp for the pmoA gene) were excised and purified using the MiniBEST DNA Fragment Purification Kit ver. 3.0 (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Japan). The purified PCR products were quantified using a NanoDrop ND-2000 spectrophotometer and mixed at an equimolar ratio. A library was constructed, and sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq platform using the MiSeq kit v3 for 2 × 300 bp paired-end sequencing (Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).
Quality filtering, denoising, paired-end read merging, and chimera removal were performed on the raw FASTQ data of the 16S rRNA and pmoA genes using Mothur software version 1.41.3 [23] according to the online instructions for the relevant commands (https://mothur.org/wiki/tags/#commands). Reads with lengths of 370–380 nt were selected for the 16S rRNA gene, and those with lengths of 470–471 nt were selected for the pmoA gene. Chimeras were filtered out using the “chimera.vsearch” and “remove.seqs” commands. Finally, high-quality sequences were classified directly using the “classify.seqs” command with a Naïve Bayes classifier at a confidence threshold of 80% [24]. For the 16S rRNA gene, all sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% sequence similarity. The representative OTU sequences were further identified via BLASTn search against the modified RDP database [25]. pmoA sequences were clustered on their deduced amino acid sequences by FunGene Pipeline with a distance cutoff of 0.07 [26] and classified using a method previously described [22].
Metagenomic sequencing, assembly, binning
DNA from the AKS-R1 and AKS-R2 soil samples from the 10–20 cm layer was fragmented to an average size of ~400 bp using a Covaris M220 (Gene Company Limited, China) for paired-end library construction. The paired-end library was constructed using the NEXTFLEX Rapid DNA-Seq Kit (Bioo Scientific, Austin, TX, USA). Adapters containing the full complement of sequencing primer hybridization sites were ligated to the blunt ends of the fragments. Paired-end sequencing was performed on the Illumina NovaSeq platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) at Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) using the NovaSeq 6000 S4 Reagent Kit v1.5 (300 cycles), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
For each soil sample, 30 Gb of raw paired-end reads were generated and uploaded to the KBase platform for processing, which included read merging, assembly, and binning [27]. Adapters and low-quality bases were removed using Trimmomatic v0.36 on the KBase platform with default parameters (ILLUMINACLIP:TruSeq3-PE.fa:2:15:4:1:true, SLIDINGWINDOW:4:15, LEADING:3, TRAILING:3, MINLEN:36) to obtain high-quality clean data [28]. Reads were assembled concurrently using metaSPAdes v3.13.0 [29] and MEGAHIT v1.2.9 [30] with default settings. Contigs ≥1.50 kb were binned using MetaBAT v2.12.1 [31] and MaxBin2 v2.2.4 [32], and the resulting bins were refined and consolidated with DAS Tool to select methanotroph MAGs [33]. Completeness and contamination were evaluated with CheckM v1.0.17 [34], and taxonomic assignment was performed with GTDB-Tk v1.7.0 [35]. Protein-coding genes were predicted using both Prokka v1.14.5 [36] and Prodigal [37]. Functional annotation was carried out with BlastKOALA against the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database [38].
Phylogenetic analysis
To infer phylogenetic affinities, the full-length pmoA and 16S rRNA genes were extracted from the MAG USC_AKS and combined with dominant USCγ OTUs obtained via amplicon sequencing in this study. For the pmoA gene tree, reference sequences included those from representative strains of Type I (e.g. Methyloculum, Methylosarcina, Methylobacter) and Type II (e.g. Methylocapsa, Methylosinus, Methylocystis) methanotrophs, as well as those from other USCγ MAGs (e.g. Lehman Cave wb1-P19, Frasassi Cave wb1-P19, USCγ_Taylor, MGR_bin175, SD8037_metabat2.bin.6, SD8020_metabat2.bin.3, and H1-B1_maxbin2.bin.5.sub). Additionally, several USCγ-related environmental sequences (uncultured bacterium clone sequences) available in GenBank, such as LHN-44 (MN566549), WR412 (MF999971), and XxxM0454 (KY606372), were also included. For the 16S rRNA gene tree, reference sequences included those from representative strains of Type I (e.g. Methylomonas, Methylomagnum) and Type II (e.g. Methylocapsa, Methylocystis, Methylosinus) methanotrophs, as well as one from MGR_bin175. Additionally, several USCγ-related environmental sequences (uncultured bacterium clone sequences) available in GenBank, such as B8-283 (KF494664), ORCA-17N118 (DQ823220), and GP27677hO1 (HM445440), were also included. Neighbor-joining trees were constructed in MEGA 7.0 using the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) model for 16S rRNA and pmoA gene sequences with 1000 bootstrap replicates, pairwise deletion of gaps, and uniform rates among sites. Phylogenetic analysis of the XoxF protein sequence encoded in the USCγ MAGs was performed using IQ-TREE v1.6.12 with the best-fit model WAG+I+G4. A maximum-likelihood phylogenomic tree was also constructed using FastTree v2.1.10 [39] and visualized with ITOL after identifying and aligning a concatenated set of 120 marker proteins with GTDB-Tk v1.7.0 [40]. The genomic average nucleotide identity (gANI) was calculated using the average nucleotide identity based on BLAST (ANIb) algorithm implemented in pyani v0.3.0-alpha (Python 3.8.15) [41] using BLAST+ 2.13.0 with the default fragment length of 1020 bp. Only reciprocal alignments that covered ≥70% of the genome and showed ≥30% nucleotide identity were retained for the final matrix.
Statistical analysis
The influence of soil depth on soil properties was assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Differences among means were compared using Duncan's multiple range test in SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 20.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), with a P-value <.05 considered statistically significant. Spearman correlation analyses among the relative abundance of USCγ, pmoA gene abundance, and soil physicochemical properties were also conducted in SPSS [42].
Results and discussion
Methanotroph abundance and composition in situ
The abundance of methanotrophs varied across soil depths and peaked significantly in the 10–20 cm layer (Fig. 1A, B). Based on the pmoA gene, abundances ranged from 1.21 × 106 to 9.04 × 106 copies g−1 dry weight soil (d.w.s.) (Fig. 1A), consistent with previously reported values for grassland soils [43, 44]. The corresponding 16S rRNA gene abundance (estimated by MiSeq sequencing and qPCR) ranged from 0.35 × 104 to 5.04 × 106 copies g−1 d.w.s. (Fig. 1B). Amplicon sequencing of the pmoA gene revealed that USCγ was the dominant methanotroph from the surface to 40 cm depth, accounting for 75.71%–99.62% of the total methanotrophs. A total of 26 USCγ OTUs were detected, among which OTU273 was the dominant phylotype (25.60%–85.25%; Fig. 1C). Previous methanotroph surveys in karst caves have demonstrated the substantial diversity of the USCγ clade [45]. Similarly, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing identified 479 USCγ OTUs, which accounted for 6.68% and 9.83% of the total microorganisms in the 10–20 cm layer at sites R1 and R2, respectively (Fig. 1D). Therefore, metagenomic sequencing was performed on these two samples.
Figure 1.
Methanotrophic community compositions and abundance in soil in situ. (a) Methanotrophic abundance based on pmoA gene copy numbers. (b) Abundance of methanotrophs among total microorganisms according to 16S rRNA gene copy numbers. (c) Methanotrophic community composition based on amplicon sequencing of the pmoA gene. (d) Relative abundance of methanotrophs among total microorganisms and their community composition based on amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene.
The physicochemical properties of the soil layers examined in this study, including particle size composition, pH, soil moisture, and inorganic nitrogen concentration (Table 1), showed no significant correlation with the enrichment of USCγ in the 10–20 cm layers (Table S1). Thus, other factors, such as oxygen concentration, soil porosity, and methane diffusion rate, likely play key roles in shaping the vertical distribution pattern of USCγ [7, 46, 47]. In this study, soil moisture increased with depth, and the silt fraction accounted for ~45% of the particle size composition, giving the soil an intermediate gas diffusion capacity between sandy and clay soils [48]. Both porosity and the diffusive fluxes of methane and oxygen decreased with depth, shifting the micro-oxic–anoxic interface upward; this upward shift likely explains the peak in USCγ abundance observed at 10–20 cm [46].
Reconstruction of USCγ MAGs
We obtained six USCγ MAGs, with completeness ranging from 79.89% to 91.70% and contamination levels ranging from 0.06% to 1.81%. GTDB-Tk classified all MAGs into the genus JACCXJ01 (Gammaproteobacteria), which is currently a provisional placeholder in the GTDB database and lacks formal nomenclature [49] (Table 2). Among these, MAG Bin.182 contained the intact 16S, 5S, and 23S rRNA genes as well as the complete pmoCAB operon. It was therefore selected for further analysis and designated USC_AKS (where “AKS” abbreviates the sampling county). A comparison of USC_AKS with other published USCγ MAGs revealed that its genome size (3.51 Mb) and number of coding genes (3601) are within the medium range. Regarding GC content, the eight MAGs could be visually grouped into three distinct ranges based on natural breakpoints. USC_AKS and MGR_bin175 exhibited the highest GC content (64.38% and 63.94%, respectively), followed by five MAGs with values in the range of 59.50%–60.50%. H1-B1_maxbin2.bin.5_sub showed the lowest GC content, at 57.88% (Table S2).
Table 2.
Genome statistics of the six MAGs obtained in this study. USC_AKS was derived exclusively from Bin.182.
| Soil sample | 166-R1(10–20 cm) | 170-R2(10–20 cm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw data size, G | 30 | 30 | |||||
| Number of clean reads | 508 144 798 | 481 311 862 | |||||
| MAG | Bin_298 | Bin_182 | Bin_012 | Bin_090 | Bin_014 | Bin_247 | |
| Assembly method | metaSPAdes | MEGAHIT | metaSPAdes | metaSPAdes | MEGAHIT | MEGAHIT | |
| Binning method | MetaBAT2 | MetaBAT2 | MaxBin2 | MetaBAT2 | MaxBin2 | MetaBAT2 | |
| Size, M | 3.91 | 3.51 | 2.59 | 2.36 | 3.06 | 2.56 | |
| Read count | 579 537 | 890 643 | 801 222 | 613 548 | 1 174 018 | 714 964 | |
| The percentage of reads mapped to bin, % | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.15 | |
| Coding density | 1.02 | 1.03 | 1.03 | 0.99 | 1.09 | 1.07 | |
| Completeness, % | 91.7 | 89.08 | 83 | 80.6 | 81.84 | 79.89 | |
| Contamination, % | 1.47 | 1.76 | 0.55 | 0.06 | 1.66 | 1.81 | |
| Taxa | o__JACCXJ01 | o__JACCXJ01 | o__JACCXJ01 | o__JACCXJ01 | o__JACCXJ01 | o__JACCXJ01 | |
| GC content, % | 64.96 | 64.38 | 65.64 | 65.79 | 64.70 | 65.40 | |
| Number of contigs | 384 | 299 | 427 | 327 | 471 | 326 | |
| Number of genes | 3081 | 3601 | 2664 | 2360 | 3357 | 2735 | |
| Number of tRNAs | 39 | 45 | 34 | 32 | 32 | 32 | |
| rRNA operon | 16S(1) | 5S(1),16S(1),23S(1) | 16S(1) | 16S(1) | - | - | |
Phylogeny of USC_AKS
The pmoA gene of USC_AKS is 744 bp in length, identical in size to those in the reported MAGs (USCγ_Taylor [15], MGR_bin175 [16], Lehman Cave wb1-P19 and Frasassi Cave wb1-P19 [17], H1-B1_maxbin2.bin.5_sub, SD8020_metabat2.bin.3, and SD8037_metabat2.bin.6 [18]). This length also matches that of most Type I methanotroph strains, such as Methylobacter tundripaludum SV96 [50] and Methylocaldum sp. SAD2 [51] (Fig. S1). In contrast, most Type II methanotrophs have a pmoA gene length of 759 bp.
The full-length pmoA gene sequence of USC_AKS exhibits the highest homology with that of MGR_bin175, with which it forms an independent USCγ subclade. It shows 96.18% identity to the representative upland soil sequence (AJ579667) originally used to define the USCγ clade (Fig. 2A). The full-length 16S rRNA genes from USC_AKS, MGR_bin175, Lehman Cave wb1-P19, and SD8037_metabat2.bin.6, together with all representative USCγ OTUs, cluster into a single, well-supported clade that contains no cultivated strains (Fig. 2B).
Figure 2.

Phylogenetic relationship of USC_AKS with its relatives based on full-length and representative sequences obtained from the pmoA (a) and 16S rRNA (b) genes. Neighbor-joining trees were constructed using MEGA 7.0 with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Only bootstrap values above 50% are shown at the branch nodes. Scale bars indicate 0.05 or 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position. The red-labeled USC_AKS represents the full-length pmoA and 16S rRNA gene sequences derived from the MAG reconstructed in this study. The blue-labeled OTUs correspond to pmoA and 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained via amplicon sequencing in this study. Sequences shown in bold black are full-length pmoA and 16S rRNA gene sequences retrieved from eight USCγ MAGs.
BLAST analysis of the full-length 16S rRNA gene of USC_AKS against the NCBI database revealed that the highest nucleotide identities (>97%) were to uncultured bacteria from environmental samples (accession numbers: JN672117, HM445440, and KC569827) (Fig. 2B). In contrast, the identity to Thioalkalivibrio sulfidiphilus HL-EbGr7 (CP001339) [52], a member of the order Chromatiales, was only 93.03% (with 100% query coverage), which was not the highest among all BLAST hits. This result is consistent with an earlier online BLASTn search of the 488-nt 16S rRNA fragment from USCγ_Taylor, which showed 94% identity to Chromatiales members Thioalkalivibrio (NR_074692) and Ectothiorhodospira (NR_125567) [15]. Instead, the latest GTDB taxonomy classifies USC_AKS within the genus JACCXJ01 (Table 2). Similarly, the four methanotrophs reported by Bay et al. [18] all fall within the USCγ/JACCXJ01 clade, with no mention of a Chromatiales-related lineage. In the study by Jones et al. [17], genome-based taxonomy assigns wb1-P19 to USCγ, and under the newly proposed nomenclature, USCγ is placed in the order “Candidatus Methyloligotrophales”. To date, the precise taxonomic placement of USC remains uncertain and will require clarification once a pure strain is obtained.
A phylogenomic tree shows that the eight available USCγ MAGs form a well-supported monophyletic clade, which clusters within Type I methanotrophs, confirming that USCγ belongs to this group (Fig. 3A). Within this main USCγ clade, three subclades can be distinguished, consistent with the groupings based on GC content (Table S2). The gANI among MAGs within each subclade was consistently below 95% (Fig. 3B). Based on the GTDB taxonomic criterion for species delineation (gANI >95%), these eight USCγ MAGs therefore represent eight distinct species. This finding highlights the substantial phylogenetic diversity contained within this as-yet-uncultivated methanotrophic lineage.
Figure 3.
Phylogenetic relationships and pairwise genome sequence similarity between USC_AKS and its relatives. (a) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree showing the placement of USC_AKS (Bin182, in red) within the USCγ clade of representative reference genomes. The remaining MAGs are shown in bold black. Bootstrap values were calculated from 1000 replicates. Scale bar equals 0.10 amino-acid substitutions per site. (b) Matrix of pairwise gANI values among all strains, presented in the same order as in (a). The intensity of red color scales with the degree of nucleic acid sequence similarity between genomes.
Methane oxidation pathway of USC_AKS
Aerobic methanotrophs catalyze methane oxidation in soil through a sequential enzymatic cascade: methane is first oxidized to methanol by methane monooxygenase (MMO), then successively converted by methanol dehydrogenase, formaldehyde dehydrogenase, and formate dehydrogenase into formaldehyde, formate, and ultimately CO2, with energy generated via electron transfer. Based on KEGG functional annotation of eight MAGs, we reconstructed the core metabolic pathways of USC_AKS and other USCγ-related methanotrophs (Fig. 4). All MAGs analyzed in this study contained a complete pmoCAB operon encoding particulate methane monooxygenase (pMMO), but none possessed genes for soluble methane monooxygenase (sMMO) or related variants such as pxmA and pmoA2 (Fig. 4, Table S3). This result is consistent with the characteristics of all previously reported USCα MAGs to date, including Candidatus Methyloaffinis lahnbergensis [3], Methylocapsa gorgona MG08 [53], Methylocapsa sp. Bog 942/Bog 920 [54], and USCα-AHI [55]. Although no mxaF-type methanol dehydrogenase was detected in USC_AKS, a highly active homodimeric methanol dehydrogenase encoded by xoxF was identified and was also commonly found in the other seven MAGs (Table S3) [56]. Phylogenetic analysis further indicated that the xoxF gene detected in USC_AKS and the other MAGs belongs to the xoxF5 clade (Fig. S2). As a PQQ-dependent, rare-earth-element-requiring enzyme, xoxF must transfer electrons to cytochrome c, and the reoxidation of cytochrome c strictly depends on O2 as the terminal electron acceptor, rendering the process obligately aerobic [56]. Genes encoding enzymes responsible for the sequential oxidation of formaldehyde to formate and ultimately to CO2 were largely complete across all eight MAGs. The absence of specific genes in a few MAGs is most likely attributable to gaps in genome assembly rather than genuine metabolic deficiencies. Although USC-related MAGs harbor near-complete gene sets for CH4-to-CO2 oxidation and phylogenetically cluster with uncultured atmospheric methanotrophs—traits consistent with a high-affinity methanotrophic lifestyle—functional validation via in situ activity assays and kinetic measurements remains essential.
Figure 4.
Metabolic reconstruction of USC_AKS. Pathways are drawn based on KEGG map files and KO assignments. Black and gray dashed arrows indicate the presence and absence, respectively, of related genes in the USC_AKS MAG. Dotted arrows represent multiple enzymatic reactions. Abbreviations: RuMP, ribulose monophosphate; EMP, Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas; GAP, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; PHB, poly-β-hydroxybutyrate; H4F, tetrahydrofolate; H4MPT, tetrahydromethanopterin; EMC, ethylmalonyl-CoA; TCA, tricarboxylic acid; CBB, Calvin–Benson–Bassham. Additionally, key genes in the USC-related MAGs are annotated using a heatmap.
Carbon assimilation by USC_AKS
Phylogenetic analysis classifies USC_AKS as a Type I methanotroph, which typically assimilates formaldehyde—a central intermediate in methane oxidation—through the ribulose monophosphate (RuMP) pathway [57]. However, USC_AKS lacks the genes encoding two key enzymes of the RuMP pathway—3-hexulose-6-phosphate synthase (hps) and 6-phospho-3-hexuloisomerase (phi) (Fig. 4, Table S3). When the first USC genome (USCγ_Taylor) was reported in 2017, the authors already noted the absence of these key enzymatic genes [15]. Notably, we found that the absence of these two key genes is conserved in subsequently reported USCγ MAGs from diverse geographical locations, appearing to be a common feature of this lineage. This distinguishes USCγ from canonical Type I methanotrophs [58]. Whether the functions of these two enzymes have been replaced by unknown enzymes or whether their coding genes were simply missed during genome assembly in the USCγ lineage remains inconclusive. Furthermore, genes encoding enzymes for multiple key steps in the Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas (EMP) pathway and the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) were detected in these USCγ MAGs (Fig. 4, Table S3).
In the initial report of the first USCγ genome (USCγ_Taylor), the authors originally described a complete serine cycle but later issued a correction, revising the statement to the more ambiguous claim that it “contains nearly all genes required for the serine biosynthesis pathway” [15]. The serine pathway is utilized by Type II methanotrophs for carbon assimilation via formate. The serine cycle in USC_AKS is also incomplete, lacking the hydroxypyruvate reductase gene (hpr) and all genes encoding enzymes required for the conversion of glycerate to 2-phosphoglycerate (2PG) (Fig. 4, Table S3). This finding contradicts earlier reports describing that the wb1-P19 MAGs from Lehman and Frasassi caves possess a complete set of serine pathway genes for formaldehyde metabolism [17]. Our re-analysis indicates that all eight MAGs analyzed lack hpr and consequently have an incomplete serine cycle (Table S3). This discrepancy most likely reflects successive updates to the KEGG database and/or differences in annotation pipelines; however, genuine biological novelty cannot be ruled out. Future studies should adopt complementary approaches, including isolation cultivation and targeted transcriptomics, to explore and validate the relevant metabolic pathways.
Glyoxylate regeneration is a key step for carbon assimilation in the serine cycle [59]. In USC_AKS, the aceA gene, encoding isocitrate lyase—the hallmark enzyme of the glyoxylate shunt—is present, and the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle gene set is largely complete (Fig. 4, Table S3). This implies that acetyl-CoA produced by the serine cycle (if this pathway is complete in USCγ) could be oxidized to glyoxylate via the glyoxylate shunt, thereby ensuring the continuous operation of the serine cycle. Such a “glyoxylate regeneration route” is characteristic of Type IIb methanotrophs but is rarely encountered in Type IIa methanotroph lineages. However, USC_AKS lacks the four core enzymes of the ethylmalonyl-CoA (EMC) pathway, indicating that glyoxylate cannot be regenerated via this route as in Type IIa methanotrophs [60]. We also examined the eight USCγ MAGs for the reductive glycine pathway (rGlyP) proposed by Tveit et al. [53] for Methylocapsa gorgona MG08. However, none of the MAGs contained a complete set of the core rGlyP genes (e.g. gcvP, gcvT, gcvH, lpd, folD, glyA), suggesting that this pathway is unlikely to contribute to carbon assimilation in USCγ. Therefore, we suspect that USC_AKS employs an as-yet-unidentified pathway for carbon assimilation, although conclusive evidence is still lacking.
Acetyl-CoA produced in the serine cycle can also be converted to poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) (Fig. 4), a carbon-storing polymer that serves as an endogenous source of reducing power for methanotrophs [61]. This capability may help USC_AKS adapt to environments with fluctuating substrate supplies [62, 63]. In addition, USC_AKS lacks Rubisco, the key CO2-fixing enzyme of the CBB cycle, a deficiency that aligns with observations for USCγ_Taylor, the wb1-P19 MAGs from Lehman and Frasassi caves, and MGR_bin175 [15–17]. Our re-analysis further confirms the absence of Rubisco in all examined USCγ MAGs (Table S3), thereby ruling out autotrophic carbon fixation via the CBB pathway in this lineage.
Biofilm formation by USC_AKS
Enriching the USCγ clade remains a significant challenge, yet obtaining pure cultures or stable enrichments is the most direct way to elucidate their physiology and metabolism. Notably, USCγ and USCα have traditionally been considered incapable of growth under elevated methane concentrations. A draft genome of a forest soil USCα MAG revealed a high abundance of genes involved in extracellular polysaccharide biosynthesis, a functional trait associated with biofilm formation. This genomic evidence suggests that USCα may depend on a biofilm growth mode, which could explain its resistance to conventional enrichment and cultivation methods [13]. Subsequently, Tveit et al. [53] successfully isolated the first USCα strain, Methylocapsa gorgona MG08, by filtering soil cells onto polycarbonate membranes, floating them on 10-fold diluted Nitrate Mineral Salts medium, and incubating them under 20% CH4.
Given the ecological parallels between USCα and USCγ, we screened the USC_AKS genome for biofilm-associated genes and identified a near-complete regulatory suite that includes intracellular signaling components (e.g. crp, cpdA, chpA, pilG) and extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) biosynthesis genes (e.g. weaE, gtE, wbpW, wecB). These genetic elements are predicted to coordinately function in assembling a multicellular biofilm matrix external to the cell (Table S4). Based on these genomic insights, the membrane-based enrichment strategy that succeeded for USCα may also prove promising for isolating USCγ in pure culture from grassland soils and cave environments, although its effectiveness remains to be empirically tested.
Nitrogen and sulfur metabolism by USC_AKS
No genes encoding the structural core of nitrogenases (nifHDK, vnfHDK, anfHDK) were found in USC_AKS or the other examined USCγ MAGs, while accessory genes like nifA, nifU, and nifQ were present (Fig. S3, Table S3). The lack of essential catalytic components indicates that biological N2 fixation is non-functional in USCγ. Consequently, its nitrogen metabolism must depend on exogenous combined nitrogen sources (e.g. NH4+, NO3−). The retained accessory genes may be evolutionary relics or may be constitutively expressed for other cellular roles, such as Fe-S cluster assembly. Unlike the widespread N2-fixation capacity characteristic of Type II methanotrophs (e.g. Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b and Methylocystis sp. strain SC2) [64, 65], genomic or physiological evidence for N2 fixation has thus far been reported only in a limited subset of Type I methanotrophs, such as certain species of Methylococcus and Methylomonas, as well as the strain Methylobacter marinus A45 [64, 66]. The genomic information from this study also revealed the presence of genes for assimilatory nitrate reduction (nasA and nirA), heterotrimeric nitrite reduction to ammonium (nirBD), ammonium transporter protein (amt), and nitrate/nitrite transporter protein (nrt) (Fig. S3, Table S3). The presence of these genes suggests that USC_AKS has the potential to utilize a wide range of combined nitrogen sources. Genes encoding the denitrification pathway were absent in USC_AKS, a feature shared with some other aerobic methanotrophs [67].
Both USC_AKS and other USCγ MAGs lack canonical energy-conserving sulfur-oxidizing modules (e.g. SoxCD, AprA, SoeABC) and complete sulfate-respiratory machinery (e.g. DsrAB, QmoABC) (Table S3). However, they carry a set of genes involved in sulfur assimilation (Table S3), including cysH and cysQ, which catalyze later steps of sulfate reduction to sulfide, as well as genes related to methionine biosynthesis (metA, metZ) and to the synthesis of sulfur-containing amino acids from sulfide (cysE). Notably, USC_AKS also contains genes involved in sulfur metabolism, including the sulfite reductase gene cluster (sir), thiosulfate/3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (sseA), and sulfate adenylyltransferase (sat). However, these genes are not specific to sulfur oxidation pathways and may be bidirectional or serve other cellular functions. An important distinction is that the seven previously reported MAGs carry cysUWA, encoding components of the sulfate/thiosulfate transport system (permease and ATP-binding proteins), whereas this operon is absent in USC_AKS. To date, research on sulfur metabolism in aerobic methanotrophs remains limited [68]. The potential interplay between sulfur metabolism and carbon metabolism, energy acquisition, and environmental adaptation in methanotrophs warrants further investigation using transcriptomic and other omics-based approaches in future studies.
Ecological and physiological properties of USC_AKS
A BLASTn search of the full-length 16S rRNA gene from USC_AKS against GenBank identified 57 sequences with >95% identity, predominantly from lava caves (55 sequences, 96.50%), with single sequences from tall-grass prairie soil and a permafrost core. These results highlight lava caves as a major habitat for USCγ, consistent with reports of their high relative abundance in cave ecosystems globally [69, 70]. For instance, USCγ accounted for 17–22% of microbial communities in karst caves across Guilin, China [69], and ~20% in Heshang Cave, Hubei Province [71]. Similarly, USCα comprised up to 10% of the total 16S rRNA gene sequences in a Portuguese cave dataset [13]. Together, these findings demonstrate that atmospheric methanotrophs such as USCγ and USCα do not require vegetated or soil-rich ecosystems, but rather thrive in mineral-dominated subterranean environments [72]. Currently, USCγ MAGs from Lehman Cave wb1-P19, Frasassi Cave wb1-P19, H1-B1_maxbin2.bin5_sub, SD8020_metabat2.bin.3, and SD8037_metabat2.bin.6 have been obtained from limestone caves in Great Basin National Park, Nevada, USA [17], Italy, and Australia [18], respectively. Their widespread occurrence in caves further suggests that USCγ-type methanotrophs may function as pioneer colonists on newly formed rock surfaces [73, 74], independent of plant-derived carbon or developed soils.
Moreover, temperature and moisture are unlikely to be key determinants of USCγ distribution. For example, the MAGs USCγ_Taylor and MGR_bin175 were retrieved from permafrost in Taylor Valley and the Mackay Glacier in Antarctica [15, 16], while USC_AKS was obtained from a temperate desert grassland. In some karst caves of China, USCγ is frequently enriched not only on cave walls but also in underlying sediments [71]. Together, these habitats span an extensive thermal gradient and highly contrasting moisture conditions, demonstrating that temperature and water availability are not decisive factors controlling the distribution and persistence of USCγ. At present, pH appears to be the sole environmental factor that clearly governs the geographic distribution of USCγ. The habitats of MGR_bin175 (pH = 7.47–10.24), USCγ_Taylor (pH = 8.15), H1-B1_maxbin2.bin.5_sub, SD8020_metabat2.bin.3 and SD8037_metabat2.bin.6 (pH = 8.05–8.34), and USC_AKS (pH = 8.76, Table 1) are overwhelmingly alkaline, consistent with earlier findings [3]. However, several studies have reported significant depth-related shifts in the relative abundance of USCγ along soil profiles [75], implying that—beyond pH—potential factors such as O₂ concentration, particle size distribution, soil porosity, and carbon and nitrogen contents, or trace metal composition may also exert control; these possibilities remain to be rigorously tested.
All published USCγ MAGs lack the signature enzymes of the RuMP pathway—the dominant carbon assimilation pathway in their phylogenetic group, Type I methanotrophs—as well as Rubisco from the CBB pathway [56] (Table S2). This absence suggests two possible explanations: on the one hand, USCγ may oxidize methane without assimilating methane-derived carbon, relying instead on alternative carbon sources such as acetate. On the other hand, the observed truncation of known carbon assimilation pathways in these MAGs could result from incomplete genome assembly rather than genuine metabolic deficiencies. Additionally, we speculate that USCγ may employ an alternative methane assimilation route distinct from the canonical RuMP and serine pathways. Although Edwards et al. [15] reported the first assembled genome of USCγ, subsequent studies have not explicitly proposed that USCγ might possess unidentified carbon fixation pathways. Therefore, obtaining pure cultures remains the most effective and essential approach to clarifying the metabolic pathways of USCγ and should be a central focus of future research.
Advances in understanding of USCγ clade
This study advances the field in two key areas: phylogenetic analysis and metabolic pathway reconstruction. First, we report the first USCγ MAG (USC_AKS) derived from a typical temperate grassland ecosystem, thereby expanding current knowledge of the geographical distribution and phylogenetic diversity of this clade. A phylogenetic tree constructed from whole-genome sequences revealed that the existing USCγ MAGs can be divided into three independent subclades with distinct genetic differences. Within this framework, USC_AKS represents a grassland-specific clade that is clearly distinguishable from MAGs originating from other specialized habitats, such as polar permafrost and caves.
Second, through systematic comparative genomic analysis of eight USCγ MAGs from different geographic origins, this study provides, for the first time at the genomic level, conclusive evidence of a consistent and conserved deficiency in the carbon assimilation pathways of this clade. Our results demonstrate that none of the known USCγ MAGs possess a complete conventional carbon assimilation pathway. Specifically: (i) they lack the core enzyme genes (hps and phi) of the RuMP pathway, which is typical of Type I methanotrophs; (ii) they lack a complete serine pathway, including the hydroxypyruvate reductase gene (hpr) and genes encoding enzymes required for the conversion of glycerate to 2-phosphoglycerate—a pathway typically used by Type II methanotrophs; and (iii) they lack the gene encoding Rubisco, the key carbon-fixing enzyme of the CBB cycle. These three metabolic deficiencies are consistently present across all eight USCγ MAGs analyzed, confirming the universality of this finding.
In summary, this study elevates previous preliminary observations or speculations based on individual MAGs to a definitive conclusion validated across multiple MAGs. Our findings clearly demonstrate that the USCγ clade lacks all known conventional carbon assimilation pathways, suggesting that USCγ may employ a previously unidentified carbon fixation strategy. This discovery provides a critical genomic foundation for understanding the energy metabolism and survival mechanisms of atmospheric methane-oxidizing bacteria in oligotrophic environments and establishes clear directions for future research aimed at elucidating their unique carbon assimilation pathways through pure culture isolation, transcriptomics, and metabolic flux analysis.
Conclusions
Based on metagenomic sequencing of a USCγ-rich desert grassland soil, we obtained the first grassland-derived USCγ MAG. An integrated analysis with other USCγ MAGs from polar and cave environments revealed that USCγ exhibits substantial phylogenetic diversity, comprising at least three subclades and eight genomes at the species level. While these MAGs encode a complete pathway for methane oxidation to CO₂, they lack the complete carbon assimilation pathways typical of cultured methanotrophs, including the RuMP pathway, the CBB cycle, and the serine cycle. Given the absence of key genes from the conventional RuMP and serine pathways, we speculate that USCγ may employ an alternative methane assimilation route. These results suggest that USCγ utilizes a carbon metabolism distinct from known methanotrophs, potentially involving an as-yet-uncharacterized carbon-assimilation mechanism that warrants further investigation. Metabolic predictions based on these MAGs further indicate that USCγ employs a rare-earth-element-dependent XoxF-type methanol dehydrogenase, lacks N2-fixing capability, and harbors genes involved in biofilm formation and PHB metabolism. These metabolic features not only offer an intrinsic explanation for their resistance to cultivation but also provide key theoretical guidance for designing targeted enrichment and isolation strategies in future studies.
Supplementary Material
Contributor Information
Yufang Wang, State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 211135, P.R. China; Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources Exploitation and Application of Gansu Province, Institute of Biology, Gansu Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730000, P.R. China; State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730020, P.R. China.
Yuanfeng Cai, State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 211135, P.R. China.
Zechen Peng, State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730020, P.R. China.
Fujiang Hou, State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730020, P.R. China.
Zhongjun Jia, State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 211135, P.R. China; Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Science, Changchun, Jinlin Province 130102 P.R. China.
Authorship contributions
Yufang Wang (Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Writing—original draft), Yuanfeng Cai (Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Writing—review & editing), Zechen Peng (Data curation, Investigation, Software), Fujiang Hou (Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources), and Zhongjun Jia (Resources, Supervision, Writing—review & editing)
Conflicts of interest
None declared.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42277114); Science and Technology Program of Gansu Province (25JRRA405).
Data availability
The raw amplicon sequence datasets for the 16S rRNA and pmoA genes have been deposited at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject number PRJNA1265376 and PRJNA1265377. This whole-genome shotgun project and the USC_AKS draft genome have been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under accession number SRP589396 (Sequence data will be released upon article publication). The full-length 16S rRNA and pmoA gene sequences extracted from the MAGs were submitted to GenBank: BankIt under accession number Submission ID 2967339 and 2 967 355. All the data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
References
- 1. Hanson RS, Hanson TE. Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol Rev 1996;60:439–71. 10.1128/mr.60.2.439-471.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Knief C, Lipski A, Dunfield PF. Diversity and activity of methanotrophic bacteria in different upland soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003;69:6703–14. 10.1128/AEM.69.11.6703-6714.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kolb S, Knief C, Dunfield PF, et al. Abundance and activity of uncultured methanotrophic bacteria involved in the consumption of atmospheric methane in two forest soils. Environ Microbiol 2005;7:1150–61. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00791.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Wang YF, Cai YF, Hou FJ, et al. Sheep grazing impacts on soil methanotrophs and their activity in typical steppe in the Loess Plateau China. Appl Soil Ecol 2022;175:104440. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104440 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Li Y, Liu YW, Pan H, et al. Impact of grazing on shaping abundance and composition of active methanotrophs and methane oxidation activity in a grassland soil. Biol Fertil Soils 2020;56:799–810. 10.1007/s00374-020-01461-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kou YP, Wei K, Li CN, et al. Deterministic processes dominate soil methanotrophic community assembly in grassland soils. Geoderma 2020;16:17–26. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kou YP, Li JB, Wang YS, et al. Scale-dependent key drivers controlling methane oxidation potential in Chinese grassland soils. Soil Biol Biochem 2017;111:104–14. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.04.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Knief C. Diversity and habitat preferences of cultivated and uncultivated aerobic methanotrophic bacteria evaluated based on pmoA as molecular marker. Front Microbiol 2015;6:1346. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Khmelenina VN, But SY, Rozova ON, et al. Metabolic features of aerobic methanotrophs: news and views. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2019;33:85–100. 10.21775/cimb.033.085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Zheng Y, Chistoserdova L. Multi-omics understanding of methanotrophs. In: Methanotrophs, Springer. 2019; pp. 121–38, 10.1007/978-3-030-23261-0_4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Jung GY, Rhee SK, Han YS, et al. Genomic and physiological properties of a facultative methane-oxidizing bacterial strain of Methylocystis sp. from a Wetland. Microorganisms 2020;8:1719. 10.3390/microorganisms8111719 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Smith GJ, Angle JC, Solden LM, et al. Members of the genus Methylobacter are inferred to account for the majority of aerobic methane oxidation in oxic soils from a freshwater wetland. mBio 2018;9:e00815–8. 10.1128/mBio.00815-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Pratscher J, Vollmers J, Wiegand S, et al. Unravelling the identity, metabolic potential and global biogeography of the atmospheric methane-oxidizing upland soil cluster α. Environ Microbiol 2018;20:1016–29. 10.1111/1462-2920.14036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Shrestha PM, Kammann C, Lenhart K, et al. Linking activity, composition and seasonal dynamics of atmospheric methane oxidizers in a meadow soil. ISME J 2012;6:1115–26. 10.1038/ismej.2011.179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Edwards CR, Onstott TC, Miller JM, et al. Draft genome sequence of uncultured upland soil cluster Gammaproteobacteria gives molecular insights into high-affinity methanotrophy. Genome Announc 2017;5:1110–28. 10.1128/genomeA.00047-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ortiz M, Leung PM, Shelley G, et al. Multiple energy sources and metabolic strategies sustain microbial diversity in Antarctic desert soils. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2021;118:e2025322118. 10.1073/pnas.2025322118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Jones DS, Green KM, Brown A, et al. Metagenomic insights into an enigmatic gammaproteobacterium that is important for carbon cycling in cave ecosystems worldwide. bioRxiv. 2024; 2024.08.23.608578. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Bay SK, Ni G, Lappan R, et al. Microbial aerotrophy enables continuous primary production in diverse cave ecosystems. Nat Commun 2025;16:10295. 10.1038/s41467-025-65209-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Stubner S. Enumeration of 16S rDNA of Desulfotomaculum lineage 1 in rice field soil by real-time PCR with SybrGreen detection. J Microbiol Methods 2002;50:155–64. 10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00024-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Holmes AJ, Costello A, Lidstrom ME, et al. Evidence that participate methane monooxygenase and ammonia monooxygenase may be evolutionarily related. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1995;132:203–8. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07834.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Bourne DG, Mcdonald IR, Murrell JC. Comparison of pmoA PCR primer sets as tools for investigating methanotroph diversity in three danish soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001;67:3802–9. 10.1128/AEM.67.9.3802-3809.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Cai YF, Zhou X, Shi LM, et al. Atmospheric methane oxidizers are dominated by upland soil cluster alpha in 20 forest soils of China. Microb Ecol 2020;80:859–71. 10.1007/s00248-020-01570-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, et al. Introducing Mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009;75:7537–41. 10.1128/AEM.01541-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, et al. Naive bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:5261–7. 10.1128/AEM.00062-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Dumont MG, Claudia L, Deng YC, et al. Classification of pmoA amplicon pyrosequences using BLAST and the lowest common ancestor method in MEGAN. Front Microbiol 2014;5:34. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Fish JA, Chai B, Wang Q, et al. FunGene: the functional gene pipeline and repository. Front Microbiol 2013;4:291. 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Arkin AP, Cottingham RW, Henry CS, et al. KBase: the United States department of energy systems biology knowledgebase. Nat Biotechnol 2018;36:566–9. 10.1038/nbt.4163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014;30:2114–20. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, et al. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res 2017;27:824–34. 10.1101/gr.213959.116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Li DH, Liu CM, Luo RB, et al. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 2015;31:1674–6. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kang DD, Froula J, Egan R, et al. MetaBAT, an efficient tool for accurately reconstructing single genomes from complex microbial communities. PeerJ 2015;3:e1165. 10.7717/peerj.1165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Wu YW, Simmons BA, Singer SW. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 2016;32:605–7. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Sieber CM, Probst AJ, Sharrar A, et al. Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy. Nat Microbiol 2018;3:836–43. 10.1038/s41564-018-0171-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, et al. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015;25:1043–55. 10.1101/gr.186072.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol 2018;36:996–1004. 10.1038/nbt.4229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014;30:2068–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010;11:119–30. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol 2016;428:726–31. 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2-approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PloS One 2010;5:e9490. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, et al. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 2019;36:1925–7. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009;106:19126–31. 10.1073/pnas.0906412106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Meyers LS, Gamst GC, Guarino A. Performing Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 43. Ma TL, Chen H, Wang YF, et al. Effects of enclosure time on the community composition of methanotrophs in the soils of the Inner Mongolia grasslands. J Soil Sediment 2016;16:1022–31. 10.1007/s11368-015-1305-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Abell GCJ, Stralis-Pavese N, Sessitsch A, et al. Grazing affects methanotroph activity and diversity in an alpine meadow soil. Environ Microbiol Rep 2009;1:457–65. 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00078.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Cheng XY, Wang HM, Zeng ZL, et al. Niche differentiation of atmospheric methane-oxidizing bacteria and their community assembly in subsurface karst caves. Environ Microbiol Rep 2022;14:886–96. 10.1111/1758-2229.13112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Knief C. Diversity of methane-cycling microorganisms in soils and their relation to oxygen. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2019;33:23–56. 10.21775/cimb.033.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Deng YC, Che RX, Wang F, et al. Upland soil cluster gamma dominates methanotrophic communities in upland grassland soils. Sci Total Environ 2019;670:826–36. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Aachib M, Mbonimpa M, Aubertin M. Measurement and prediction of the oxygen diffusion coefficient in unsaturated media, with applications to soil covers. Water Air Soil Pollut 2004;156:163–93. 10.1023/B:WATE.0000036803.84061.e5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Bowers RM, Kyrpides NC, Stepanauskas R, et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol 2017;35:725–31. 10.1038/nbt.3893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Svenning MM, Hestnes AG, Wartiainen I, et al. Genome sequence of the arctic methanotroph Methylobacter tundripaludum SV96. J Bacteriol 2011;193:6418–9. 10.1128/JB.05380-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Wei XD, Ge XM, Li YB, et al. Draft genome sequence of Methylocaldum sp. SAD2, a methanotrophic strain that can convert raw biogas to methanol in the presence of hydrogen sulfide. Genome Announc 2017;5:e00716–7. 10.1128/genomeA.00716-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Muyzer G, Sorokin DY, Mavromatis K, et al. Complete genome sequence of “Thioalkalivibrio sulfidophilus” HL-EbGr7. Stand Genomic Sci 2011;4:23–35. 10.4056/sigs.1483693 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Tveit AT, Hestnes AG, Robinson SL, et al. Widespread soil bacterium that oxidizes atmospheric methane. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2019;116:8515–24. 10.1073/pnas.1817812116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Singleton CM, McCalley CK, Woodcroft BJ, et al. Methanotrophy across a natural permafrost thaw environment. ISME J 2018;12:2544–58. 10.1038/s41396-018-0065-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Rusley C, Onstott TC, Vishnivetskaya TA, et al. Metagenome-assembled genome of USCα AHI, a potential high-affinity methanotroph from Axel Heiberg Island. Canadian High Arctic Microbiol Resour Announc 2019;8:e01178–19. 10.1128/MRA.01178-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Keltjens JT, Pol A, Reimann J, et al. PQQ-dependent methanol dehydrogenases: rare-earth elements make a difference. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2014;98:6163–83. 10.1007/s00253-014-5766-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Trotsenko YA, Murrell JC. Metabolic aspects of aerobic obligate methanotrophy. Adv Appl Microbiol 2008; 63: 183–229, San Diego, Calif., Elsevier, 10.1016/S0065-2164(07)00005-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Smith T, Trotsenko Y, Murrell J. Physiology and biochemistry of the aerobic methane oxidizing bacteria. Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology. 2010; pp.765–79. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg: 10.1007/978-3-540-77587-4_58 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Bordel S, Rojas A, Muñoz R. Reconstruction of a genome scale metabolic model of the polyhydroxybutyrate producing methanotroph Methylocystis parvus OBBP. Microb Cell Fact 2019;18:104–15. 10.1186/s12934-019-1154-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Korotkova N, Chistoserdova L, Kuksa V, et al. Glyoxylate regeneration pathway in the methylotroph Methylobacterium extorquens AM1. J Bacteriol 2002;184:1750–8. 10.1128/JB.184.6.1750-1758.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Henrysson T, McCarty PL. Influence of the endogenous storage lipid poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate on the reducing power availability during cometabolism of trichloroethylene and naphthalene by resting methanotrophic mixed cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993;59:1602–6. 10.1128/aem.59.5.1602-1606.1993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Sipkema EM, de Koning W, Ganzeveld KJ, et al. NADH-regulated metabolic model for growth of Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b. Model presentation, parameter estimation, and model validation. Biotechnol Prog 2000;16:176–88. 10.1021/bp9901567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Cai YF, Zheng Y, Bodelier PL, et al. Conventional methanotrophs are responsible for atmospheric methane oxidation in paddy soils. Nat Commun 2016;7:11728. 10.1038/ncomms11728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Dedysh SN, Ricke P, Liesack W. NifH and NifD phylogenies: an evolutionary basis for understanding nitrogen fixation capabilities of methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol 2004;150:1301–13. 10.1099/mic.0.26585-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Oakley C, Colin Murrell J. nifH genes in the obligate methane oxidizing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1988;49:53–7. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1988.tb02681.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Auman AJ, Speake CC, Lidstrom ME. nifH sequences and nitrogen fixation in type I and type II methanotrophs. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001;67:4009–16. 10.1128/AEM.67.9.4009-4016.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Stein LY, Klotz MG. Nitrifying and denitrifying pathways of methanotrophic bacteria. Biochem Soc Trans 2011;39:1826–31. 10.1042/BST20110712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Ghashghavi M, Belova SE, Bodelier PL, et al. Methylotetracoccus oryzae strain C50C1 is a novel type Ib gammaproteobacterial methanotroph adapted to freshwater environments. mSphere. 2019;4:e00631–18. 10.1128/mSphere.00631-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Cheng XY, Zeng ZL, Liu XY, et al. Methanotrophs dominate methanogens and act as a methane sink in a subterranean karst cave. Sci Total Environ 2023;892:164562. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Gong ST, Luo WJ, Hao LK, et al. Progress in understanding the methane sink and methanotrophs in karst caves. Environ Rev 2023;31:298–309. 10.1139/er-2022-0034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Zhao R, Wang HM, Cheng XY, et al. Upland soil cluster γ dominates the methanotroph communities in the karst Heshang cave. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2018;94:fiy192. 10.1093/femsec/fiy192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. King GM, Nanba K. Distribution of atmospheric methane oxidation and methanotrophic communities on Hawaiian volcanic deposits and soils. Microbes Environ 2008;23:326–30. 10.1264/jsme2.ME08529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Gatinho P, Salvador C, Silva AM, et al. Prokaryotic communities from pristine cave environments: biotechnological potential with sustainable production. Sustainability. 2023;15:7471. 10.3390/su15097471 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Täumer J, Kolb S, Boeddinghaus RS, et al. Divergent drivers of the microbial methane sink in temperate forest and grassland soils. Glob Chang Biol 2021;27:929–40. 10.1111/gcb.15430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Wang YF, Cai YF, Hou FJ, et al. Depth-dependent patterns of activity and abundance of atmospheric methane oxidizing bacteria in semiarid grassland on the loess plateau of China. Appl Soil Ecol 2024;45:1631–62. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.105237 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw amplicon sequence datasets for the 16S rRNA and pmoA genes have been deposited at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject number PRJNA1265376 and PRJNA1265377. This whole-genome shotgun project and the USC_AKS draft genome have been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under accession number SRP589396 (Sequence data will be released upon article publication). The full-length 16S rRNA and pmoA gene sequences extracted from the MAGs were submitted to GenBank: BankIt under accession number Submission ID 2967339 and 2 967 355. All the data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.



