Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1976 Jan;25(1):43–54. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-43

Titration of schedule parameters by pigeons1

S E G Lea
PMCID: PMC1333413  PMID: 16811894

Abstract

Pigeons were tested in a computer-controlled two-key chamber. A standard (nonchanging) schedule of reinforcement was in force on one key, and an adjusting schedule on the other. The schedules were available concurrently after each reinforcement, but after the first peck on either key (the choice peck), the schedule on the other key was made inoperative. The parameter of the adjusting schedule was decreased when the standard schedule was chosen and increased when the adjusting schedule was chosen. The standard schedule was changed only between sessions. Fixed intervals and fixed ratios were used as standard schedules, and intervals and ratios were used as adjusting schedules. When standard and adjusting schedules were of the same type, median parameters on the adjusting key equalled those of the standard schedules, at four values of each standard schedule. For four of five birds, and for the group median, similar curves could be plotted through the indifference points obtained from a standard ratio with an adjusting interval, and from a standard interval with an adjusting ratio. These points showed consistent individual differences, but they could be predicted by assuming that the median time from the choice peck to reinforcement should be the same on both keys. This is equivalent to treating the schedule as a concurrent chain and assuming that Herrnstein's quantitative law of effect applies.

Keywords: titration, indifference curve, adjusting schedule, fixed ratio, fixed interval, matching law, concurrent chains, key peck, pigeons

Full text

PDF
43

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BLOUGH D. S. A method for obtaining psychophysical thresholds from the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Jan;1:31–43. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BLOUGH D. S. Method for tracing dark adaptation in the pigeon. Science. 1955 May 13;121(3150):703–704. doi: 10.1126/science.121.3150.703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baum W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CHRISTENSEN K. R. Isohedonic contours in the sucrose-sodium chloride area of gustatory stimulation. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1962 Jun;55:337–341. doi: 10.1037/h0046208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davison M. C. Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Mar;12(2):247–252. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davison M. C., Temple W. Preference for fixed-interval schedules: an alternative model. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Nov;20(3):393–403. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Duncan B., Fantino E. Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jul;14(1):73–86. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fantino E. Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Jan;10(1):35–43. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Findley J. D. Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Apr;1(2):123–144. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hodos W., Trumbule G. H. Strategies of schedule preference in chimpanzees. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Nov;10(6):503–514. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hursh S. R., Fantino E. Relative delay of reinforcement and choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 May;19(3):437–450. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. JONES L. V., FISKE D. W. Models for testing the significance of combined results. Psychol Bull. 1953 Sep;50(5):375–382. doi: 10.1037/h0057844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. LOGAN F. A. DECISION MAKING BY RATS: DELAY VERSUS AMOUNT OF REWARD. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1965 Feb;59:1–12. doi: 10.1037/h0021633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Labounty C. E., Reynolds G. S. An analysis of response and time matching to reinforcement in concurrent ratio-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jan;19(1):155–166. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Morgan M. J. Effects of random reinforcement sequences. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):301–310. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rachlin H., Green L. Commitment, choice and self-control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jan;17(1):15–22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rachlin H. Response control with titration of punishment. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Mar;17(2):147–157. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. STEIN L., RAY O. S. Self-regulation of brain-stimulating current intensity in the rat. Science. 1959 Sep 4;130(3375):570–572. doi: 10.1126/science.130.3375.570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schwartz B. Effects of reinforcement magnitude on pigeons' preference for different fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Mar;12(2):253–259. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stubbs A. The discrimination of stimulus duration by pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):223–238. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. VERHAVE T. TOWARDS AN EMPIRICAL CALCULUS OF REINFORCEMENT VALUE. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Oct;6:525–536. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. WEISS B., LATIES V. G. Fractional escape and avoidance on a titration schedule. Science. 1958 Dec 19;128(3338):1575–1576. doi: 10.1126/science.128.3338.1575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. WERTHEIM G. A. SEQUENTIAL PROPERTIES OF SIDMAN-AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Mar;7:170–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES