Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1976 Mar;25(2):129–141. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-129

Near-field visual acuity of pigeons: effects of head location and stimulus luminance.

W Hodos, R W Leibowitz, J C Bonbright Jr
PMCID: PMC1333445  PMID: 932615

Abstract

Two pigeons were trained to discriminate a grating stimulus from a blank stimulus of equivalent luminance in a three-key chamber. The stimuli and blanks were presented behind a transparent center key. The procedure was a conditional discrimination in which pecks on the left key were reinforced if the blank had been present behind the center key and pecks on the right key were reinforced if the grating had been present behind the center key. The spatial frequency of the stimuli was varied in each session from four to 29.5 lines per millimeter in accordance with a variation of the method of constant stimuli. The number of lines per millimeter that the subjects could discriminate at threshold was determined from psychometric functions. Data were collected at five values of stimulus luminance ranging from--0.07 to 3.29 log cd/m2. The distance from the stimulus to the anterior nodal point of the eye, which was determined from measurements taken from high-speed motion-picture photographs of three additional pigeons and published intraocular measurements, was 62.0 mm. This distance and the grating detection thresholds were used to calculate the visual acuity of the birds at each level of luminance. Acuity improved with increasing luminance to a peak value of 0.52, which corresponds to a visual angle of 1.92 min, at a luminance of 2.33 log cd/m2. Further increase in luminance produced a small decline in acuity.

Full text

PDF
129

Images in this article

134Fig. 1.
on p.134

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BLOUGH D. S. Dark adaptation in the pigeon. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1956 Oct;49(5):425–430. doi: 10.1037/h0043257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Binggeli R. L., Paule W. J. The pigeon retina: quantitative aspects of the optic nerve and ganglion cell layer. J Comp Neurol. 1969 Sep;137(1):1–18. doi: 10.1002/cne.901370102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blough P. M. The visual acuity of the pigeon for distant targets. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jan;15(1):57–67. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blough P. M. Visual acuity in the pigeon. II. Effects of target distance and retinal lesions. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Nov;20(3):333–343. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CATANIA A. C. ON THE VISUAL ACUITY OF THE PIGEON. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Sep;7:361–366. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell F. W., Kulikowski J. J., Levinson J. The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings. J Physiol. 1966 Nov;187(2):427–436. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Galifret Y. Les diverses aires fonctionnelles de la rétine du pigeon. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1968;86(4):535–545. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hodos W., Bonbright J. C., Jr The detection of visual intensity differences by pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Nov;18(3):471–479. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Krasnegor N. A., Hodos W. The evaluation and control of acoustical standing waves. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):243–249. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Marshall J., Mellerio J., Palmer D. A. A schematic eye for the pigeon. Vision Res. 1973 Dec;13(12):2449–2453. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90242-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Millodot M., Blough P. The refractive state of the pigeon eye. Vision Res. 1971 Sep;11(9):1019–1022. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(71)90223-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nye P. W. On the functional differences between frontal and lateral visual fields of the pigeon. Vision Res. 1973 Mar;13(3):559–574. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90024-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nye P. W. The binocular acuity of the pigeon measured in terms of the modulation transfer function. Vision Res. 1968 Aug;8(8):1041–1053. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(68)90076-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pokorny J. The effect of target area on grating acuity. Vision Res. 1968 May;8(5):543–554. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(68)90095-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith R. F. Topography of the food-reinforced key peck and the source of 30-millisecond interresponse times. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):541–551. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zeigler H. P., Schmerler S. Visual discrimination of orientation by pigeons. Anim Behav. 1965 Oct;13(4):475–477. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(65)90109-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES