Abstract
Pigeons discriminated stimulus duration in a psychophysical choice situation. Following presentation of any duration from a set of short duration (11 to 15 sec), responses on a red key were reinforced intermittently. Following presentation of any duration from a set of long durations (16 to 22 sec), responses on a green key were reinforced intermittently. Relative reinforcement rates were manipulated for choice responses across conditions. As relative reinforcement rates were varied, psychometric functions showed shifts in green-key responses at all durations. A signal-detection analysis showed that sensitivity remained roughly constant across conditions while response bias changed as a function of changes in relative reinforcement rate. Relative error rates tended to match relative reinforcement rates.
Keywords: stimulus duration, signal detection, discrimination, response bias, matching function, concurrent schedules, pigeons
Full text
PDF![243](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1371/1333456/d220032f769c/jeabehav00107-0117.png)
![244](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1371/1333456/a57855612c99/jeabehav00107-0118.png)
![245](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1371/1333456/9031c9b59973/jeabehav00107-0119.png)
![246](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1371/1333456/0941ec01f4f7/jeabehav00107-0120.png)
![247](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1371/1333456/158434dd7539/jeabehav00107-0121.png)
![248](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1371/1333456/5cb55dd6562a/jeabehav00107-0122.png)
![249](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1371/1333456/e48392728a21/jeabehav00107-0123.png)
![250](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1371/1333456/544a11c3a0b7/jeabehav00107-0124.png)
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Baum W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blough D. S. Stimulus generalization as signal detection in pigeons. Science. 1967 Nov 17;158(3803):940–941. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3803.940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blough P. M. The visual acuity of the pigeon for distant targets. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jan;15(1):57–67. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boneau C. A., Cole J. L. Decision theory, the pigeon, and the psychophysical function. Psychol Rev. 1967 Mar;74(2):123–135. doi: 10.1037/h0024287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clopton B. M. Detection of increments in noise intensity by monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 May;17(3):473–481. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grier J. B. Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: computing formulas. Psychol Bull. 1971 Jun;75(6):424–429. doi: 10.1037/h0031246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HACK M. H. Signal detection in the rat. Science. 1963 Feb 22;139(3556):758–760. doi: 10.1126/science.139.3556.758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HERRNSTEIN R. J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:267–272. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hume A. L., Irwin R. J. Bias functions and operating characteristics of rats discriminating auditory stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Mar;21(2):285–295. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Irwin R. J., Terman M. Detection of brief tones in noise by rats. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):135–143. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MARKOWITZ H., SASLOW M. G. A RELIABLE SILENT ELECTRONIC SHOCK SCRAMBLER. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 May;7:267–268. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nevin J. A. Decision theory in studies of discrimination in animals. Science. 1965 Nov 19;150(3699):1057–1057. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3699.1057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Shimp C. P. Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Jul;9(4):443–455. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stubbs A. The discrimination of stimulus duration by pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):223–238. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stubbs D. A., Pliskoff S. S. Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):887–895. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stubbs D. A., Thomas J. R. Discrimination of stimulus duration and d-amphetamine in pigeons: a psychophysical analysis. Psychopharmacologia. 1974 May 15;36(4):313–322. doi: 10.1007/BF00422563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Terman M. Discrimination of auditory intensities by rats. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):145–160. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]