Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1976 May;25(3):355–359. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-355

Acquisition of the autoshaped key peck as a function of amount of preliminary magazine training1

G D Steinhauer, G H Davol, A Lee
PMCID: PMC1333474  PMID: 16811919

Abstract

Three experiments evaluated the effect of magazine training on acquisition of the pigeon's key peck during autoshaping. In Experiment I, pigeons were exposed to two days of extended magazine training, followed on the third day by keylight-only presentations. All pigeons pecked the keylight early in the keylight-only session. Experiment II examined the relationship between the number of magazine-training trials and trials to the first peck. Pigeons were given either 0, 3, 10, or 25 magazine-training trials followed by the standard autoshaping procedure. The number of trials to the first peck was related to the number of magazine-training trials. In Experiment III, pigeons were exposed to the standard autoshaping procedure without prior magazine training. The data from Experiment III suggested that key pecking will occur only after the response of eating from the lighted hopper has occurred. Taken together, these results suggest that initial magazine training is an important variable in autoshaping. Key pecking is discussed as a generalized consummatory response.

Keywords: autoshaping, magazine training, key peck, pigeons

Full text

PDF
355

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bilbrey J., Winokur S. Controls for and constraints on auto-shaping. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Nov;20(3):323–332. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown P. L., Jenkins H. M. Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):1–8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Engberg L. A., Hansen G., Welker R. L., Thomas D. R. Acquisition of Key-Pecking via Autoshaping as a Function of Prior Experience: "Learned Laziness"? Science. 1972 Dec 1;178(4064):1002–1004. doi: 10.1126/science.178.4064.1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jenkins H. M., Moore B. R. The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Sep;20(2):163–181. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schwartz B., Williams D. R. The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 May;17(3):351–357. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES